Debashish Banerji Makarand R. Paranjape Editors Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures Debashish Banerji • Makarand R
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Conversation with Rosi Braidotti 27/01/16 11:33
Conversation with Rosi Braidotti 27/01/16 11:33 nYwebsite en tijdschrift voor literatuur, kritiek & amusement, voorheen yang & freespace Nieuwzuid Nieuwste nummer > Transitzone/ RosiConversation Braidotti, Sarah Posman with Rosi Braidotti Published: 19/06/2013 Tags: litcrit interview philosophy psychoanalysis Sarah Posman (nY) in conversation with Rosi Braidotti on contemporary feminism and amor fati, in March 2012. Sarah Posman: In Metamorphosis: Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming you write that “time is on our side.” Do you still feel that way in the light of the present moments of crisis that we’re witnessing in society and academia – the lack of funding for Women’s Studies departments in the low countries is an urgent example. When there is revolt against these developments – the riots in cities across Europe, the academe-affiliated Occupy movements – it doesn’t seem to come in the Dionysian guise you promote. Rosi Braidotti: The phrase “time is on our side” is grounded both in an intellectual and institutional practice of feminism. For me feminist theory is transformative. This implies a debate with gender and gender mainstreaming, which is one of the great growth areas not only of the academe but of our society, and an area that will produce a great deal of employment for our students. Gender mainstreaming is egalitarian and terribly important. I support it completely, but it is not transformative, necessarily. I was watching TV last night, on the eve of international women’s day, and all the major international networks were doing features on the status of women. Al Jazeera had a wonderful set of interviews about women in the Arab world and women entrepreneurs in India. -
Twenty-Third International Congress of Vedanta August 10-13, 2017
Twenty - Third International Congress of Vedanta August 10 - 13, 2017 On August 10 - 13, 2017 the Twenty - Third International Congress of Vedanta was hosted by T he Center for Indic Studies, University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth, USA in collaboration with the Institute of Advanced Sciences, Dartmouth, USA . The inauguration session started in the morning of first day with Vedic c hanting performed by Swami Yogatmananda, Vedanta Society of Providence, and Swami Atmajnanananda, Vedanta Center of Greater Washington , DC . Welcome address and i ntroduction presented by Conference Director Prof. Sukalyan Sengupta, University of Massachusetts , Dartmouth. Founding Director, Vedanta Congress Prof. S.S. Ramarao Pappu was felicitated in this session. Conference started with an inaugural l ecture by Mr. Rajeev Srinivasan on “ Leveraging the Grand Dharmic Narrative for Soft Power ”. Dr. Alex Hankey, SVYASA Bangalore and Dr. Makarand Paranjape, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New D elhi were the keynote speakers during this inaugural session . They deliver ed their talk s on “ Synthesizing Vedic and Modern Theories to Explain Cognition of Forms ” and “ Vedanta and Aesthetics ” , respectively. This session was concluded under the chairmanship of Prof. Raghwendra P . Singh, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India. Inaugural Session, 23 rd International Vedanta Congress The Vedanta Congress continues its tradition of bringing scholars of Indic traditions from India and the West together on a platform nearly from three decades. Delegates from various -
The Battle for Sanskrit Book Launch
NEWSLETTER ISSUE 01 | APRIL 2016 The Battle for Sanskrit book launch During the months of January and early February, Sri Rajiv Malhotra conducted various lectures across India on his new book – “The Battle for Sanskrit”. The venues include Bangalore: Karnataka Samskrit University, Yuvabrigade, Bharati Vidya Bhavan, Samskrita Bharati, Indian Institute of Science, Amrita College of Engineering and the Art of Living. Mumbai: Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Samskrita Bharati, Tata Institute of Social Sciences and Chinmaya Mission. Chennai: Kuppuswami Sastri Research Institute, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Bharati Vidya Bhavan, Samskrita Bharati and Ramakrishna Mutt. Release of The Battle for Sanskrit at Sri Krishna Vrundavana, New Jersey Ahmedabad: Indus University. Delhi: Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi University, Samskrita Bharati. Apart from the tour in India, Shri Rajiv Malhotra has conducted a lecture at Massachusetts Institute of Technology and another at Columbia University. Response to “The Battle for Sanskrit”:- 132 scholars and intellectuals from premier Sanskrit universities, institutes of technology, institutes of The Battle for Sanskrit has drawn the admiration of science, management institutes, universities of arts several scholars and intellectuals. It has received and traditional learning centres for the removal of strong endorsements from such luminaries as Prof Sheldon Pollock as Chief Editor of the Murty Classical Kapil Kapoor, Prof Dilip Chakrabarti, Prof Roddam Library. The Murty Classical Library is a project to Narasimha, Prof Arvind Sharma, Prof Pankaj Chande, translate 500 Indian literary texts into English funded Prof K Ramasubramanian, Prof R Vaidyanathan, Prof by Mr. Rohan Murty with a commitment of $5.6 Dayananda Bharghava, Prof S.R. Bhatt, Prof K.S. -
The Case for Sanskrit As India's National Language by Makarand
The Case for Sanskrit as India’s National Language By Makarand Paranjape August 2012 This paper discusses in depth the role and the potential of Sanskrit in India’s cultural and national landscape. Reproduced with the author’s permission, it has been published in Sanskrit and Other Indian Languages , ed. Shashiprabha Kumar (New Delhi: D. K. Printworld, 2007), pp. 173- 200. “Sanskrit is the thread on which the pearls of the necklace of Indian culture are strung; break the thread and all the pearls will be scattered, even lost forever.” Dr. Lokesh Chandra Introduction I had first heard from my friends in the Sri Aurobindo Ashram, Pondicherry, that the Mother wanted Sanskrit to be made the national language of India. Indeed, Sanskrit is taught from childhood not only in the ashram schools, but also at Auroville, the comm unity that the Mother founded. On 11th November 1967, the Mother said: “ Sanskrit! Everyone should learn that. Especially everyone who works here should learn that….” 1 Because some degree of confusion persisted over the Mother’s and Sri Aurobindo’s views on the topic, a more direct question was put to the former on 4 October 1971: On certain issues where You and Sri Aurobindo have given direct answers, we [Sri Aurobindo's Action] are also specific, as for instance... on the language issue where You have said for the country that (1) the regional language should be the medium of instruction, (2) Sanskrit should be the national language, and (3) English should be the international language. Are we correct in giving these replies to such questions? Yes. -
Writing As a Nomadic Subject
Comparative Critical Studies 11.2–3 (2014): 163–184 Edinburgh University Press DOI: 10.3366/ccs.2014.0122 C British Comparative Literature Association www.euppublishing.com/ccs Writing as a Nomadic Subject ROSI BRAIDOTTI I am rooted but I flow Virginia Woolf, The Waves1 My lifelong engagement in the project of nomadic subjectivity has been partly motivated by the conviction that, in these globalized times of accelerating technologically mediated changes, many traditional points of reference and age-old habits of thought are being re-composed, albeit in contradictory ways. Paradoxically, old power relations are not only confirmed but in many ways exacerbated in the new geo-political context.2 At such a time more conceptual creativity is necessary, and more theoretical courage is needed in order to bring about the leap across inertia, nostalgia, aporia and the other forms of critical stasis induced by our historical condition. It has become like a mantra to me: we need to learn to think differently about the kind of subjects we have already become and the processes of deep-seated transformation we are undergoing. The philosopher in me believes that a new alliance between philosophy, the arts and science is a crucial building block for this qualitative shift of perspective.3 The writer in me, on the other hand, continues to muse about the complex ways in which the imaginary both propels and resists in-depth transformations. A MATTER OF STYLE At the beginning of it all, for my generation, is the commitment to writing. Presented as a form of political and ethical engagement, it is essentially a visceral gesture. -
Rosi Braidotti, the Posthuman
The Posthuman The Posthuman Rosi Braidotti polity Copyright © Rosi Braidotti 2013 The right of Rosi Braidotti to be identifi ed as Author of this Work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published in 2013 by Polity Press Polity Press 65 Bridge Street Cambridge CB2 1UR, UK Polity Press 350 Main Street Malden, MA 02148, USA All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. ISBN-13: 978-0-7456-4157-7 ISBN-13: 978-0-7456-4158-4 (pb) A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Typeset in 10.5 on 12 pt Sabon by Toppan Best-set Premedia Limited Printed and bound in Great Britain by MPG Books Group Limited, Bodmin, Cornwall The publisher has used its best endeavours to ensure that the URLs for external websites referred to in this book are correct and active at the time of going to press. However, the publisher has no responsibility for the websites and can make no guarantee that a site will remain live or that the content is or will remain appropriate. Every effort has been made to trace all copyright holders, but if any have been inadvertently overlooked the publisher will be pleased to include any necessary credits in any subsequent reprint or edition. -
A Cartography of Angry Indian Goddesses Towards Nomadic Affect
Indi@logs Vol 7 2020, pp 11-25, ISSN: 2339-8523 DOI https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/indialogs.150 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ A CARTOGRAPHY OF ANGRY INDIAN GODDESSES TOWARDS NOMADIC AFFECT INDRANI MUKHERJEE Jawaharlal Nehru University [email protected] Received: 31-10-2019 Accepted: 17-12-2019 ABSTRACT This paper attempts to draw a cartography of becoming Angry Indian Goddesses as transnational nomadism towards an embodied and material rethinking of women’s friendships from outside the constraints of systemic binaries. The friends are all professional women who are globally wired, whose thinking minds and non-docile bodies detach themselves from any normative modes of belonging in their respective personal and professional realms. They map a post-humanist spatiality of rhizomic linkages with other animate and non-animate entities, throwing up a new ethics of nomadic affect and responsibility. The film begins with a panoramic gaze of the Goan landscape, overlapped with flash images of Hindu goddesses and their animal escorts framed within a power packed song “Kattey”, which intersects Bhanwari Devi’s powerful folk composition of Meera Bai’s 15th century mystic tradition with Haard Kaur’s rap. The crossing of the song and the violent events of rejection that the women face, unbridle a becoming angry goddesses through a pastiche of the anxious goddesses and women sited on an axis of re/de-valorised difference. Goa becomes a potential third space entangled with all of the above, as it dwells on the contemplative scope of this cartography as redemptive and suggests a re-humanization of schizophrenic splintered objects through love and affect. -
Professor Makarand Paranjape Currently Holds the ICCR Chair in Indian Studies, South Asian Studies Programme, National University of Singapore
The Center for the Study of Hindu Traditions, University of Florida presents The Relevance of Gandhi to Environmental Studies by Professor Makarand Paranjape Professor Makarand Paranjape currently holds the ICCR Chair in Indian Studies, South Asian Studies Programme, National University of Singapore. He is also Professor of English, Centre for English Studies, School of Language, Literature, and Culture Studies at the Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. He received his M.A. and Ph.D. in English from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Professor Paranjape has held a number of fellowships in several universities; he was previously the Homi Bhabha Fellow for Literature in India; Shastri Indo-Candian Research Fellow, University of Calgary; IFUSS Fellow, University of Iowa; Mellon Fellow, Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center, University of Texas at Austin; and Shivdasani Visiting Fellow, Oxford Centre for Hindu Studies, University of Oxford. He has also been a Visiting Professor at the Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona and the Universitat des Sarlandes. Professor Paranjape will also be leading a class discussion on Hindu Traditions in Singapore (April 11, 2:30 pm, Room 117, Anderson Hall) Professor Paranjape is the author or editor of several books including Decolonization and Development: Hind Svaraj Revisioned (1993); Nativism: Essays in Literary Criticism (Sahitya Akademi, 1997); In Diaspora: Theories, Histories, Texts, Editor (2001); Sacred Australia: post-secular considerations (2009); Altered Destinations: Self, Society, and Nation in India (Perth: University of Western Australia Press, 2010); Bollywood in Australia: Transnationalism and Cultural Production (Perth: University of Western Australia Press, 2010); as well as the author of several volumes of poetry and fiction.. -
Raja Rao and the Politics of Truth
Lingue e Linguaggi Lingue Linguaggi 13 (2015), 227- ISSN 2239-0367, e-ISSN 2239-0359 DOI 10.1285/i22390359v13p227 http://siba-ese.unisalento.it, © 2015 Università del Salento FROM INDIANNESS TO HUMANNESS: RAJA RAO AND THE POLITICS OF TRUTH STEFANO MERCANTI UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI UDINE Abstract – Raja Rao is not merely a metaphysical writer, as many scholars of the first Commonwealth generation depict him as being, but rather a much more complex one whose literary dimensions transcend the commonplace essentializing ‘Hinduness’ projected by many critics over three decades. I thus suggest instead an amplification of Rao’s idea of India by framing his novels in a cross-cultural space which evolves during the course of his entire oeuvre on both philosophical and political levels. This dynamic ambivalence has its foremost predecessor in Mahatma Gandhi’s politico-spiritual legacy, Satyagraha (‘the force of Truth’) which becomes the centripetal and cohesive force of Raja Rao’s fiction. Keywords: Indianness; partnership model; Mahatma Gandhi; Indian English literature. Raja Rao is known to have given birth to the Indian English novel as an expression of a precise ideological re-construction of India’s racial, philosophical, cultural and linguistic specificities. His work asserted itself on the inter-national scene, and especially in a trans- national way, due to the originality of an idea of India capable of communicating with the West even through images and life styles distinctively indigenous. However, because of this extraordinary celebration of India’s native cultural distinctiveness, Raja Rao has been often ossified within the cultural construct of a universalistic Indian identity, an Indianness quintessentially and metaphysically Hindu, thus blurring the complexities and making exotic Indian geography and culture. -
Anthropos Redux: a Defence of Monism in the Anthropocene Epoch
© FRAME NO. 29.2 NOVEMBER 2016 | 29 – 46 Anthropos Redux: A Defence of Monism in the Anthropocene Epoch ROSI BRAIDOTTI ABSTRACT This essay starts from the new and internally contradictory assumption that the historical contemporary concerns, such as the situation of today is unprecedented fast technological developments on in ecological, economic, socio- the one hand and the perpetuation political, as well as affective of more familiar patterns of terms. The era known as the oppression, like structural Anthropocene requires new ways economic inequalities, on the of thinking in order to account other. Both aspects of the present for new practices and discourses predicament will receive critical related to this situation. By attention in the cartography of offering a defence of Spinozist the Anthropocenic era that I will monism, this essay attempts to discuss here and which I read in strike a critical balance between terms of the posthuman condition. 30 ROSI BRAIDOTTI About Monism Monistic ontologies have had a hard time in critical thought. A “monistic universe,” predicated upon the rejection of binary oppositions and dialectical negativity has often been misunderstood or dismissed. In this paper I will therefore challenge this knee-jerk reaction and defend monism by exploring some of its implications for a theory and practice of neo-material vitalist vision of political subjectivity. In the recently emerged framework of the Anthropocene,1 a monistic approach to subjectivity can offer not only an escape from the dualistic foundations locatable in most ideological and political social structures, but also the starting-point of a new relational ecology that rejects violent hierarchies, is more compassionate, and actively de-centres anthropocentrism. -
A Dialogue Between Rosi Braidotti and Nina Lykke
Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 5(2), 20 ISSN: 2468-4414 The Long March Through the Patriarchal Institutions: A Dialogue Between Rosi Braidotti and Nina Lykke Lea Skewes 1*, Stine Willum Adrian 2 Published: September 1, 2021 ABSTRACT Doing feminist work from within patriarchal institutions comes with unique challenges. We invited two activists and feminist studies professors, Rosi Braidotti and Nina Lykke, to reflect on feminists’ long march through patriarchal university institutions. Concretely, we asked them to reflect upon three themes. Firstly, we asked them to situate themselves and their work – and reflect upon what it takes to do feminist work which troubles mainstream epistemologies. Secondly, we asked them to explore how the conditions for feminist research have changed over time – and what the current neoliberal and right-wing backlash does to feminist research. And finally, we asked how coming of age might have influenced them, and how they looked upon intergenerational exchanges in the feminist movement. The aim of the dialogue was to look back at how the feminist studies movement in academia emerged, while at the same time looking forward to explore which new political and ideological conditions have arisen and how these might affect future possibilities for conducting feminist research within academia. Keywords: Braidotti, Lykke, patriarchal institutions, feminist studies, feminist revolutions THE CONTEXT FOR THE DIALOGUE The dialogue between Rosi Braidotti and Nina Lykke took place at Aarhus University in Denmark in September 2018. The event was organised by the Gendering in Research Network and the three editors of the special issue of Women, Gender and Research called Feminist STS at Work1 (Adrian, Skewes and Schwennesen, 2018). -
Editorial: Why Affirmative Critique?
Editorial 1 Editorial: Why affirmative critique? Having completed my Master’s study on power in the classroom, I had a tremendous feeling: I had discovered so much. The ethnographic research had been eye-opening. Everything related to my Foucault-inspired notion of power and discourse – how thoroughly embedded we were in power structures and webs of power relations. I saw and realized now things that others hardly noticed within the business-as-usual. For example, the teacher of my research class was obvious to how she was reinforcing discourses of normalised gender within the seemingly innocent everyday practices of school. I felt uneasy about talking to the teacher about what I had noticed. I was afraid that it could hurt her feelings, make her feel negative about herself as teacher. I still don’t know whether she read my study. I also struggled to find ways of talking about my study with the pupils of the class, about the games that the girls enjoyed, the ways in which they learned to be disciplined as they lived their everyday lives. I did feel the urge to inform them about the critical aspects I had discovered – that all their actions reflected power and even if they did not know it themselves, they were constantly reproducing restricting discourses. The auditorium is full of people. Here we are, educational scholars at an international conference. The keynote speaker presents an ongoing research project. It concerns schooling, gender and racism. The PowerPoint slide gives an example of how student’s racist comments are met with silence from the teachers.