Bolts, Nuts, and Large Screws of Iron Or Steel: Us

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bolts, Nuts, and Large Screws of Iron Or Steel: Us BOLTS, NUTS, AND LARGE SCREWS OF IRON OR STEEL: U.S. PRODUCTION, SHIPMENTS, IMPORTS, EXPORTS, APPARENT CONSUMPTION, .··· EMPLOYMENT, MAN-HOURS, AND PRICES, Fl RST CALENDAR QUARTER .. 1980 Report to the President on Investigation No. 332-103 Under Section 332 of the Tariff Act of 1930 USITC PUBLICATION 1070 MAY 198Q United States International Trade Commission I Washington, D.C. 20436 . UNITED STATES INTERNATiONAL TRADE COMMISSION . COMMISSIONERS Catherine Bedell, Chairman Bill Alberger, Vice Chairman · George M. Moore Paula Stern Michael J. Calhoun Kenneth R. Mason, Secretary to the Commission This report was prepared principally by James M. Brandon, Brenda Harrison, and Wanda Tolson Minerals and Metals Division Off ice of Industries Norris A. Lynch, Director Address all communications to Office of the· Secretary _·U _ nit~d States International Trade Commission Washington, D.C. 20436 Summary Highlights of the Fifth Quarterly Survey of U.S . Produc ers of Bolts, Nuts, and Large Screws of Iron or Steel Production U.S. production of bolts, nuts, and large screws during the first quarter of 1980 totaled 283 million pounds, which was about 15 percent less than production during the first quarter of 1979, but 4 percent greater t han production during the fourth quarter of 1979. U.S. producers' shipments During the first quarter of 1980, U.S. producers' shipments amounted to 263 million pounds, which was 18 percent less than shipments in the first quarter of 1979 and about 5 percent larger than shipments during the fourth quarter of 1979. U.S. imports U.S. imports of bolts, nuts, and large screws totaled approximately 185 million pounds in the first quarter of 1980, which was about 9 percent less than imports in the first quarter of 1979 but 5 percent larger than imports in the fourth quarter of 1979. U.S. exports The quantity of bolts, nuts, and large screws exported during the first quarter of 1980 was 45 percent less than exports during the first quarter of 1979, and 29 percent less than exports during the fourth quarter of 1979. Apparent consumption Apparent consumption of bolts, nuts, and large screws during the first quarter of 1980 was 419 million pounds, which was 11 percent less than apparent con sumption in the first quarter of 1979 , but 9 percent greater t han the II quantities consumed during the fourth quarter of 1979. The ratio of imports to consumption increased from 43 percent during the first quarter of 1979 to 46 percent during the last quarter of 1979 before decreasing to 44 percent during the first quarter of 1980. Employment and man-hours The average number of production and related workers engaged in the production of bolts, nuts, and large screws decreased during each of the periods under discussion, from 13,759 workers during the 'first quarter of 1979 to 13,571 workers during the first quarter of 1980. The man-hours expended by these workers followed the same trend, decreasing from 8,338,000 during the first quarter of 1979 to 7,718,000 during the first quarter of 1980. Prices With the exception of prices received for cap screws and structural bolts, the average lowest net selling prices received by U.S. producers in the first quarter of 1980 were, on an average, about 9 percent greater than prices received during the first quarter of 1979 and were about the same as prices received during the fourth quarter of 1979. The prices received for cap screws fluctuated during the three quarters under discussion and were about 6 percent less during the first quarter of 1980 than prices received during the fourth quarter of 1979. Prices received for structural bolts declined during each of the three quarters. III C 0 N T E N T S 1. Bolts, nuts, and large screws of iron or steel: U.S. production, by types, by months, July 1978-March 1980------------------------------- 1 2. Bolts, nuts, and large screws of iron or steel: U.S. producers' shipments, imports for consumption, exports of domestic merchandise, and apparent consumption, 1976-78, and specified, periods July 1978- March 1980----------------------------------------------------------- 2 3. Bolts, nuts, and large screws of iron or steel: U.S. producers' shipments, by types, 1976-78, and specified periods, July 1978- March 1980----------------------------------------------------------- 4 4. Bolts, nuts, and large screws of iron or steel: U.S. imports for consumption, by types, 1976-78, and specified periods, July 1978- March 1980----------------------------------------------------------- 6 S. Average number of persons employed in U.S. establishments in which bolts, nuts, and large screws were produced, total and production and related workers engaged in the production of all products and of bolts, nuts, and large screws, 1976-78 and specified periods July 1978-March 1980------------------------------------------------- 8 6.- Man-hours expended by production and related workers in U.S. establishments in which bolts, nuts, and large screws were produced, 1976-78, and specified periods, July 1978-March 1980------- 9 7. Bolts, nuts, and large screws: Ranges and averages of lowest net selling prices received by U.S. producers on sales to distributors, by specified periods, January 1976-March 1980--------------------------- 10 8. Bolts, nuts, and large screws: Ranges and averages of lowest net selling prices received by U.S. producers on sales to distributors, by specified periods, January 1976-March 1980----------------------~---- 11 9. Bolts, nuts, and large screws: Ranges and averages of lowest net selling prices received by U.S. producers on sales to distributors, by specified periods, January 1976-March 1980------------------------ 12 "·., / .. .· .. .;.:·1" Page 1 Table 1.--Bolts, nuts, and large screws of iron or steel: U.S. production by types, by months, July 1978-March 1980 Period Bolts and Nuts Total . large screws ~~~--~~~~~--~~~~~~~~~ Quantity (1,000 pounds) 1978: July-------------------: 52,048 12,198 64,246 August-----------------: 75,474 21,264 96,738 September--------------: 78,718 17,898 96,616 Total--------------: 206,240 51,360 257,600 October----------------: 85,488 21, 315 106,803 November---------------: 78,473 21,349 99,822 December---------------: 79, 112 19,181 98,293 Total--------------: 243,073 61,845 304,918 1979: January----~-----------: 86,160 23,338 109,498 February---------------: 82,889 23,045 105,934 March------------------: · 92' 660 26,487 119,147 Total--------------: 261,709 72' 8}0 334,579 April------------------: 88,018 23,769 111, 787 May--------------------: 91,225 25' 791 117,016 June-------------------: 91,981 25,641 117,622 Total--------------: 271, 224 75,201 346,425 July-------------------: 70,932 18,530 89,462 August-----------------: 87,107 26,317 113, 424 September--------------: 79,457 22,152 101,609 Total--------------: 237,496 66,999 304,495 October----------------: 84,894 26,086 110, 980 November---------------: 71, 784 21,813 93,597 December---------------: 52' 110 15, 771 67,881 Total--------------: 208,788 63,670 272,458 1980: January----------------: 73,497 20,139 93,636 February---------------: 72 ,084 21, 022 93,106 March------------------: 73,185 23,363 96,548 Total--------------: 218' 766 64,524 283,290 ..... Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to questi onnaires of the U.S. International Trade Commission. Page 2 Table 2.--Bolts, nuts, and l arge screws of iron or steel: u: s. producers' shipments, imports for consumption, exports of domestic merchandise, and appare nt consumption, 1976-78, an~ specified periods, J uly 1978-March i980 Rati o (p~rcent) of Producers': Apparent i mports to-- Period ship- I mports 1/: Expor ts 2/: consump- Apparent ments . ti on :Shipments: consump­ tion Quantity (1,000 pounds) 1976-------------: 1,133,952 704,474 197,269 1,641,157 : 62 43 1977-------------: 1,175;563 716, 916 218,265 1,674, 214 61 43 1978-------------: 1,151,326 849 , 313 217,051 1,783,588 74 48 1978: July-----------: 67,335 77,074 15 , 255 129,154 115 60 August---------: 93,943 72, 349 21 , 301 · 144,991 7:7 50 September--~--:_· __9_4_,~2_3_7_ · ___ 6 ~5 ~,3_8_0_·___ 1_4~,5_2_8 __ -,-1_4_5~,_08_9:----- ~6 ~9 ____~4_5 Total--------: 255,515 21 4 ,803 51,084 419,234 84 51 October--------: 100,634 66,751 20,439 146,946 66 45 November-------: 92,699 67 ,107 17,723 142,083 72 47 December-------: · 83;616 · 53,181 15,413 121,384 64 44 Total--------:--2-7-6~,~9~4-9_ __1_87-'-,o-3_9 ____ 53_,_,5_7_5 ___ 4_1_0~,4-l-3---- ~68-. -.---~4-6 1979: January--------: 107,364 65,181 16,192 156,353 61 42 February-------: 99,152 68 , 174 17,566 149,760 69 46 March----------: ---'--115,276- - - 70,611 19,122 166,765 61 42 Tot al --- - - --- : 321,792 203,966 52,880 472,878 63 43 April----------: 103,489 68,070 24,769 146,790 66 46 May------------: 107,568 68,862 19,074 157,356 64 44 June-----------: 105,460 77,122 17,651 164,931 73 47 Total--------: ---316~,517--- 214,054 61,494 469,077 68 46 July-----------: 84,630 69 , 596 12 ,938 141,288 : 82 49 August---------: 97,699 68,857 15,781 150,775 70 46 September------: 91,688 60,225 14,828 137,085 66 44 Tot al - -- ---- - : ---~--274,017 --19--''--8, 678- 43,547 429 , 148 73 46 October--------: 99,680 55 ,543 15,844 139, 379 56 40 November-------: 83,240 59,165 15,426 126,979 71 47 December-------: 66,181 61,577 9,982 117,776 93 52 Total--------: --:-~-"--:-~----249,101 176,285-,-''---::~-·~--,--'-------~~-- 41, 252 384,134 --------71 -~46 1980: January--------: 90, 113 61,594 9,500 142,207 68 43 February-------: 84,916 62, 925 9,123 138' 718 74 45 ' March----------: 88,374 60 , 206 10,705 137,875 68 44 Total--------: 263,403 184, 72 5 29,328 418,800 70 44 See footnotes at end of table.
Recommended publications
  • 3/1980 Report
    MARCH 1980 SURVEY March 28, 1980 Surveyso fConsume rAttitude s Richard T.Curtin , Director §> CONSUMER SENTIMENT FALLS TO NEW RECORD LOW LEVEL **In the March 1980 survey, the Index of Consumer Sentiment was 56.5,dow n more than 10 Index-points from February 1980 (66.9) and March 1979 (68.4), and represents the lowest level recorded in more than a quarter-century. At no time have consumers been more pessimistic about their ownpersona l financial situation or about prospects for the economy as a whole. Importantly, the major portion of these declines were recorded prior to President Carter's latest inflation message just 10 percent of the interviews were conducted after Carter's speech. **Among families with incomes of $15,000 and over, the Index of Consumer Senti­ ment was 51.3 in March 1980,dow n from 60.2 in February 1980, and 65.2i n March 1979. TheMarc h 1980 Index figure of 51.3 is below the prior record low of 53.6 recorded in February 1975. **New record low levels recorded in March 1980include : *Near1y half (48 percent) of all families reported in March 1980 that they were worse off financially than a year earlier, twice the propor­ tion whoreporte d an improved financial situation (24 percent). *Three-in-four respondents (76 percent) expected bad times financially for the economy as a whole during the next 12 months, while just 14 percent expected improvement. ^Interest rates were expected to increase during the next 12 months by 71 percent of all families in March 1980an d the highest rates of expected inflation were recorded during early 1980, with consumers expecting inflation to average 12% during the next 12 months.
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL AGREEMENT on 1 April 1980 TARIFFS and TRADE Limited Distribution
    RESTRICTED L/4914/Rev.1 GENERAL AGREEMENT ON 1 April 1980 TARIFFS AND TRADE Limited Distribution MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS Status of Acceptances of Protocols, Agreements and Arrangements (as of 31 March 1980) The following Protocols, Agreements and Arrangements have been accepted by the Governments listed on the dates and with the conditions specified. A. Geneva (1979) Protocol to the General.Agreement on Tariffs and Trade - Argentina 11 July 1979 - Austria subjectt to ratification) 17 October 1979 Ratification 28 December 1979 - Belgium (Subject to ratification) 17 December 1979 - Canada (subject to ratification) 11 July 1979 - Denmark (subject to ratification). 17 December 1979 Ratification with regard to the products 21 December 1979 subject to the regime of the European Coal and Steel Community and except as regards its application to the Faroe Islands. - European Economic Community 13 July 1979 (For authentification of the Protocol and of the schedules of tariff concessions annexed thereto, and subject to conclusion by the European Communities in accordance with the procedures in force) Acceptance 17 December 1979 - Finland (subject to ratification) 11 July 1979 Ratification 13 March 1980 - France 17 December 1979 - Germany, Fed. Rep. (subject to ratification) 17 December 1979 - Hungary 17 December 1979 - Iceland (subject to ratification) 18 September 1979 - Ireland 17 December 1979 - Israel (subject to ratification) 22 November 1979 - Italy 17 December 1979 - Jamaica 12 December 1979 - Japan (subject to acceptance) 27 July 1979 - Luxembourg 17 December 1979 L/4914/Rev.1 Page 2 - Netherlands 17 December 1979 The acceptance shall apply to the Kingdom in Europe only. However, the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands reserves the right to extend the acceptance of the-Protocol by written notification to the Netherlands Antilles at a later date.
    [Show full text]
  • US Covert Operations Toward Iran, February-November 1979
    This article was downloaded by: [Tulane University] On: 05 January 2015, At: 09:36 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Middle Eastern Studies Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fmes20 US Covert Operations toward Iran, February–November 1979: Was the CIA Trying to Overthrow the Islamic Regime? Mark Gasiorowski Published online: 01 Aug 2014. Click for updates To cite this article: Mark Gasiorowski (2015) US Covert Operations toward Iran, February–November 1979: Was the CIA Trying to Overthrow the Islamic Regime?, Middle Eastern Studies, 51:1, 115-135, DOI: 10.1080/00263206.2014.938643 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2014.938643 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
    [Show full text]
  • Maps Cited by Congress When Designating Wilderness
    Maps Summary Table In 2003 long-time NPS Wilderness Coordinator Wes Henry prepared this table that was intended for inclusion in the updated Reference Manual 41 – Wilderness Management. Wes died soon thereafter. PEER has updated the table to reflect information through 2014. RM 41: Section F: DRAFT January 21, 2003 Maps Cited by Congress when Designating Wilderness. The table lists in: Column 2: maps cited by Congress when designating NPS wilderness (in chronological order by date of enactment); Column 3: date of an official legal description prepared after designation, and Column 4: whether a post-enactment official boundary map was prepared. NPS AREA – CONGRESSIONAL DATE OF DATE OF WILDERNESS MAP NUMBER OFFICIAL OFFICAL MAP DATE AND DATE, CITED LEGAL IN LAW DESCRIPTION Craters of the 131-91,000 December 1970 NPS cited Moon – Oct. 1970 March 1970 legislative map Petrified Forest - NP-PF-3320-O December 1970 NPS cited October 1970 November 1967 legislative map Lava Beds – NM-LB-3227H December 1972 NPS cited October 1972 August 1972 legislative map Lassen Volcanic – NP-LV-9013C June 1973 NPS cited October 1972 August 1972 legislative map Point Reyes – 612-90,000-B May 1978 February 1977 October 1976 September 1976 Bandelier – 315-20,014-B August 1978 August 1978 October 1976 May 1976 Black Canyon of 144-20,017 January 1977 January 1977 the Gunnison – May 1973 October 1976 Chiricahua - 145-20,007-A May 1978 January 1977 October 1976 September 1973 Great Sand Dunes 140-20,006-C December 1976; January 1980 October 1976 February 1976 Revised:
    [Show full text]
  • WHCA Video Log
    WHCA Video Log Tape # Date Title Format Duration Network C1 9/23/1976 Carter/Ford Debate #1 (Tape 1) In Philadelphia, Domestic Issues BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 90 ABC C2 9/23/1976 Carter/Ford Debate #1 (Tape 2) In Philadelphia, Domestic Issues BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 ABC C3 10/6/1976 Carter/Ford Debate #2 In San Francisco, Foreign Policy BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 90 ABC C4 10/15/1976 Mondale/Dole Debate BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 90 NBC C5 10/17/1976 Face the Nation with Walter Mondale BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 CBS C6 10/22/1976 Carter/Ford Debate #3 At William & Mary, not complete BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 90 NBC C7 11/1/1976 Carter Election Special BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 ABC C8 11/3/1976 Composite tape of Carter/Mondale activities 11/2-11/3/1976 BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 CBS C9 11/4/1976 Carter Press Conference BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 ALL C10 11/7/1976 Ski Scene with Walter Mondale BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 WMAL C11 11/7/1976 Agronsky at Large with Mondale & Dole BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 WETA C12 11/29/1976 CBS Special with Cronkite & Carter BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 CBS C13 12/3/1976 Carter Press Conference BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 60 ALL C14 12/13/1976 Mike Douglas Show with Lillian and Amy Carter BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 60 CBS C15 12/14/1976 Carter Press Conference BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 60 ALL C16 12/14/1976 Barbara Walters Special with Peters/Streisand and Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 60 ABC Page 1 of 92 Tape # Date Title Format Duration Network C17 12/16/1976 Carter Press Conference BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 ABC C18 12/21/1976 Carter Press Conference BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 ALL C19 12/23/1976 Carter Press Conference BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 ABC C20 12/29/1976 Good Morning America with Carter and Cabinet Members (Tape 1) BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 60 ABC C21 12/29/1976 Good Morning America with Carter and Cabinet Members (Tape 2) Digital Files, Umatic 60 ABC C22 1/4/1977 Dinah Shore Show with Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
    RESTRICTED GENERAL AGREEMENT ON L/4914/Rev.4 25 June 1981 TARIFFS AND TRADE Limited Distribution MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS Status of Acceptances of Protocols/ Agreements and Arrangements (as- of 22 June 1981)1 The following Protocols, Agreements and Arrangements have been accepted by the Governments listed on the dates and with the conditions or declarations specified. A. Geneva (1979) Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade Argentina 11 July 1979 Austria (subject to ratification) 17 October 1979 Ratification 28 December 1979 Belgium (subject to ratification) 17 December 1979 Ratification 7 May 1981 Canada (subject to ratification) 11 July 1979 Czechoslovakia 16 June 1980 Denmark (subject to ratification) 17 December 1979 Ratification with regard to the products 21 December 1979 subject to the régime of the European Coal and Steel Community and except as regards its application to the Faroe Islands European Economic Community 13 July 1979 (For authentication of the Protocol and of the schedules of tariff concessions annexed thereto, and subject to conclusion by the European Communities in accordance with the procedures in force) Acceptance 17 December 1979 Finland (subject to ratification) 11 July 1979 Ratification 13 March 1980 France 17 December 1979 Germany, Fed. Rep. (subject to ratification) 17 December 1979 Ratification 7 November 1980 The Geneva (1979) Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade shall also apply to Berlin (West) with effect from the date on which it enters into force for the Federal Republic of Germany This document consolidates the information contained in docu­ ments L/4914/Rev.3 and Adds. 1-15.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Term # of Terms Total Years on the Council Presidencies # Of
    Country Term # of Total Presidencies # of terms years on Presidencies the Council Elected Members Algeria 3 6 4 2004 - 2005 December 2004 1 1988 - 1989 May 1988, August 1989 2 1968 - 1969 July 1968 1 Angola 2 4 2 2015 – 2016 March 2016 1 2003 - 2004 November 2003 1 Argentina 9 18 15 2013 - 2014 August 2013, October 2014 2 2005 - 2006 January 2005, March 2006 2 1999 - 2000 February 2000 1 1994 - 1995 January 1995 1 1987 - 1988 March 1987, June 1988 2 1971 - 1972 March 1971, July 1972 2 1966 - 1967 January 1967 1 1959 - 1960 May 1959, April 1960 2 1948 - 1949 November 1948, November 1949 2 Australia 5 10 10 2013 - 2014 September 2013, November 2014 2 1985 - 1986 November 1985 1 1973 - 1974 October 1973, December 1974 2 1956 - 1957 June 1956, June 1957 2 1946 - 1947 February 1946, January 1947, December 1947 3 Austria 3 6 4 2009 - 2010 November 2009 1 1991 - 1992 March 1991, May 1992 2 1973 - 1974 November 1973 1 Azerbaijan 1 2 2 2012 - 2013 May 2012, October 2013 2 Bahrain 1 2 1 1998 - 1999 December 1998 1 Bangladesh 2 4 3 2000 - 2001 March 2000, June 2001 2 Country Term # of Total Presidencies # of terms years on Presidencies the Council 1979 - 1980 October 1979 1 Belarus1 1 2 1 1974 - 1975 January 1975 1 Belgium 5 10 11 2007 - 2008 June 2007, August 2008 2 1991 - 1992 April 1991, June 1992 2 1971 - 1972 April 1971, August 1972 2 1955 - 1956 July 1955, July 1956 2 1947 - 1948 February 1947, January 1948, December 1948 3 Benin 2 4 3 2004 - 2005 February 2005 1 1976 - 1977 March 1976, May 1977 2 Bolivia 3 6 7 2017 - 2018 June 2017, October
    [Show full text]
  • Than Half of All Children Have Working Mothers
    Special Labor Force Reports-Summaries More than half of all children ly to have fewer children than women of comparable have working mothers ages in the past. As a result, many of those who eventu- ally become mothers have spent more years in the labor force than many of their predecessors, and they often ALLYSON SHERMAN GROSSMAN choose to remain in the work force or return to it soon after childbearing . In contrast, the early marriage and More children than ever before have mothers who are prolific childbearing patterns of a generation ago result- in the labor force. In March 1981, 31 .8 million young- ed in the almost automatic and prolonged withdrawal sters below age 18-54 percent of the Nation's total- of young mothers from the labor force.' had mothers who were either employed or looking for Because of these trends, the traditional concept of a work. (See table 1 .) Since 1970, the number of children family with the father as the only earner has changed with working mothers has grown by 6.2 million despite dramatically. For example, both parents were earners in a 6.6-million decline in the children's population.' about 60 percent of all married-couple families with By March 1981, a record 8.2 million children below children under 18 years in 1981 . (See table 2.) On aver- age 6-45 percent of all preschoolers-had working age, these dual-earner families were smaller than compa- mothers. A year earlier, these figures were 7.7 million or rable single-earner families.
    [Show full text]
  • General Agreement on ™F'196, Tariffs and Trade
    GENERAL AGREEMENT ON ™F'196, 24 April 1981 TARIFFS AND TRADE Limited Distribution DOCUMENTS INDEX 1 January-31 December 1980 This index covers all documents in the following series issued by the secretariat in 1980: L/ COM.AD/ COM.TEX/INF/ C/ C0M.AG/W7 COM.TD/ 0 C/M/ BOP/ COM.TD/W/ C/W7 BOP/R/ MTN/ SR.36/ BOP/W/ TAR/ W.36/ COM.TEX/ TAR/M/ THIRTY-SIX COM.TEX/W/ TAR/W7 COM.IND/W/ COM.TEX/SB/ INF/ Previous indices were issued in: Publications INF/3/Rev.2 (10 October 1955) INF/130 (28 March 1968) INF/44 (26 February 1957) INF/135 (11 February 1969) INF/54 (21 February 1958) INF/139 (8 May 1970) INF/67 (31 January 1959) INF/142 (22 April 1971) INF/81 (15 March 1960) INF/149 (21 April 1972) 0 INF/87 (10 March 1961) INF/153 (30 March 1973) INF/98 (22 March 1962) INF/157 (25 March 1974) INF/100 (29 January 1963) INF/161 (17 March 1975) INF/106 (9 March 1964) INF/167 (3 June 1976) INF/111 (31 March 1965) INF/171 (22 April 1977) INF/117 (23 February 1966) INF/177 (21 April 1978) INF/124 (13 April 1967) INF/180 (12 March 1979) INF/191 (1 May 1980) INF/196 Page 2 Activities of the GATT Discussion CPs SR.36/2,3, Corr.1 + 4 Agreement between Finland and Czechoslovakia Information furnished by parties to the Agreement L/4988 Report noted by Council (9 October 1980) C/M/143 Agreement between Finland and Hungary Report noted by Council (29 January 1980) C/M/138 Agreement between Finland and Poland Report of WP L/4928 C/M/139 Adoption of report by Council (26 March 1980) Agricultural Adjustment Act (see "United States waiver ..
    [Show full text]
  • Earthquakes in the United States January-March 1980
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 853-A Earthquakes in the United States January-March 1980 Earthquakes in the United States January-March 1980 By C. W. Stover, J. H. Minsch, B. G. Reagor, and P. K. Smith GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 853-A 1981 United States Department of the Interior JAMES G. WATT, Secretary Geological Survey Doyle G. Frederick, Acting Director Free on application to the Branch of Distribution, U.S. Geological Survey, 604 South Pickett Street, Alexandria, VA 22304 CONTENTS Page Introduction................................................................. A1 Discussion of tables......................................................... 1 Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale of 1931.................................... 8 Acknowledgments.............................................................. 41 References cited............................................................. 41 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE 1. "Earthquake Report" form.......................................... A2 2. Map showing standard time zones of the conterminous United States. 4 3. Map showing standard time zones of Alaska and Hawaii.............. 5 4. Map of earthquake epicenters in the conterminous United States for January-March 1980............ •• • • • • • • • • • • • •• •• • • • • •• • • •• • •• • • • •• • 6 5. Map of earthquake epicenters in Alaska for January-March 1980..... 7 6. Map of earthquake epicenters in Hawaii for January-March 1980..... 8 7. Isoseismal map for the central California earthquake of 24 January 1980...................... •• • • • • • ••
    [Show full text]
  • MARCH 1980 Running Empty Is Our State's Highway Program Headed for a Dead End? by James Earp, Managing Editor
    . Supreme Cou rt 1,2&'1. 5 upholds job safety rights A unanimous U.S. Supreme agreements and safety training nine days previously. Court's decision has sent an "un- That situation may be accom- Court ruled this month that Ameri- programs, we have always pro- The two workers were told to go equivocal signal to employers and panied by circumstances "in which can workers may refuse, free from tected our members' rights to re- out on the screen 20 feet above the workers alike that the law protects the employee has reason to believe =4 f employer retaliation, to perform fuse to carry out a job if he or she floor to retrieve small appliance employees who refuse to work there is not sufficient time or op- :~ Y jobs they consider too dangerous. believes it to be unsafe. The Su- parts spilled from a massive con- when forced to choose between portunity either to seek effective The Justices upheld a Labor preme Court's ruling this month veyor belt system above, The their jobs and their lives," redress from his employer or to ap- - ~ Dept. regulation that bars em- reaffirms that basic right. Failure to screen was in place to protect The Supreme Court decision prise OSHA of the danger. " ployer action against workers who have upheld the Labor Dept, regu- workers in the plant from spilling noted the elaborate system under base their refusals on a belief that lations would have destroyed ev- parts, but the retrieval had resulted which OSHA gets a worker appeal, It is in this kind of situation that a the assigned tasks present an im- erything we have worked so long in other workers falling partially or investigates and when necessary worker's right to refuse an assign- mediate danger of death or serious and hard to gain in the area of job completely through the screen.
    [Show full text]
  • Of These, There Were About 60% Origin, and About 12% of Other
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 224 652 RC 013 706 TITLE Persons of Spanish Origin in theUnited States: March 1980 (Advance Report). PopulationCharacteristics, Current Population Reports. SeriesP-20, No. 361. INSTITUTION Bureau of the Census (DOC), Suitland,Md. Population Div. PUB DATE May 81 NOTE 8p.; For related document, see ED158 953. AVAILABLE FROMSuperintendent of Documents, U.S. GovernmentPrinting Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 (Series P-20, No.361, $1.00). PUB TYPE Statistical Data (110) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Age; *Census Figures; Cubans;*Demography; Employment Level; *Ethnic Origins; *HispanicAmericans; Income; Mexican Americans; National Surveys;Population Trends; Puerto Ricans; Residential Patterns; *Socioeconomic Background; Tables (Data) ABSTRACT The Bureau of the Census collectedinformation on age, residence,employment status, occupation, andincome in March 1980 as a supplement to its monthlyCurrent Population Survey. Data indicated that in March 1980 there wereabout 13.2 million persons of Spanish origin in the United States.Of these, there were about 60% of Mexican origin, 14% of PuertoRican origin, 6% of Cuban oricin, 8% of Central or South Americanorigin, and about 12% of other Spanish origin. About 84% of allSpanish-origin families resided in metropolitan areas. The median age ofHispanic persons was 22 years. About 13% of the Spanish-originpopulation was under 5 years of age and about 4% were 65 yearsold and over. About 5 million Spanish-origin persons were in thecivilian labor force. The unemployment rate for Spanish-origin persons washigher (8.9%) than that for non-Spanish persons(6.5%). Only about 9% of Spanish-origin persons were workingin professional occupations, 24%worked as operatives, and abut 3% were employed asfarm laborers.
    [Show full text]