DOCSLIB.ORG

Earthquakes in the United States January-March 1980

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Earthquakes in the United States January-March 1980 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 853-A Earthquakes in the United States January-March 1980 Earthquakes in the United States January-March 1980 By C. W. Stover, J. H. Minsch, B. G. Reagor, and P. K. Smith GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 853-A 1981 United States Department of the Interior JAMES G. WATT, Secretary Geological Survey Doyle G. Frederick, Acting Director Free on application to the Branch of Distribution, U.S. Geological Survey, 604 South Pickett Street, Alexandria, VA 22304 CONTENTS Page Introduction................................................................. A1 Discussion of tables......................................................... 1 Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale of 1931.................................... 8 Acknowledgments.............................................................. 41 References cited............................................................. 41 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE 1. "Earthquake Report" form.......................................... A2 2. Map showing standard time zones of the conterminous United States. 4 3. Map showing standard time zones of Alaska and Hawaii.............. 5 4. Map of earthquake epicenters in the conterminous United States for January-March 1980............ •• • • • • • • • • • • • •• •• • • • • •• • • •• • •• • • • •• • 6 5. Map of earthquake epicenters in Alaska for January-March 1980..... 7 6. Map of earthquake epicenters in Hawaii for January-March 1980..... 8 7. Isoseismal map for the central California earthquake of 24 January 1980...................... •• • • • • • •• • •• • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • •• • •• • • • • • • • 19 8. Photograph of damage to fermenting tanks at the Wente Brothers Winery near Livermore, Calif...................................... 22 9. Photograph of damage to one support of the elevated water tank at the Wente Brothers Winery near Livermore, Calif ••••••••••••••••••• 23 10. Photograph of damage to a mobile home in the Sunrise Mobile Home Park in Spring town, Cal if • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 26 11. Isoseismal map for the southern California earthquake of 25 February 1980.................................................. 34 12. Isoseismal map for the southeastern Pennsylvania earthquake of 5 March 1980...................................................... 40 13. Isoseismal map for the southeastern Pennsylvania earthquake of 11 March 1980 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 40 iii TABLES Page TABLE 1. Summary of U.S. earthquakes for January-March 1980: Alaska. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • A1 0 California.................................................... 11 California--Off the coast..................................... 13 Hawaii........................................................ 13 Idaho. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 14 Illinois •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 14 Kentucky...................................................... 14 Maine........... • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 14 Montana. • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 14 Nevada........................................................ 14 New Mexico. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 14 New York...................................................... 14 Oregon--Off the coast......................................... 15 Pennsylvania.................................................. 15 Texas......... • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 15 Utah.......................................................... 15 Washington.................................................... 15 Wyoming • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 16 Page 2. Summary of macroseismic data for U.S. earthquakes, January-March 1980: Alaska. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • A16 California •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 17 California--off the coast ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 36 Connecticut................................................... 36 Hawaii. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 36 Idaho.. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 38 Illinois ••••••••••••••••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 38 Kentucky...................................................... 38 Maine. • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 38 Montana. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 38 Nevada.. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 39 New Jersey •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 39 New Mexico.................................................... 39 New York ••••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 39 Pennsylvania. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 39 Wyoming. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 40 iv Earthquakes in the United States, January-March 1980 By C. W. Stover, J. H. Minsch, B. G. Reagor, and P. K. Smith INTRODUCTION from other Government agencies, State institu­ tions, local organizations, and individuals. The earthquake information in this publica­ (See "Acknowledgments'·' for a list of collabora­ tion supplements that published in the NElS tors.) Figure 1 is the questionnaire in use by (National Earthquake Information Service) publi­ the NElS. Other types of questionnaires are used cations, PDE ("Preliminary Determination of Epi­ by State agencies, engineering firms, and other centers") and "Preliminary Determination of Epi­ Government agencies to collect intensity data. centers Monthly Listing," by providing detailed Anyone wishing to submit felt or damage informa­ felt and intensity data for U.S. earthquakes. tion on earthquakes for inclusion in future The purpose of this circular is to provide a reports sh6uld send it to the National Earth­ complete listing of macro-seismic effects of quake Information Service, Stop 967, Box 25046, earthquakes, which can be used in risk studies, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225. Copies nuclear power plant site evaluations, seismicity of the current "Earthquake Report" questionnaire studies, and to answer inquiries by the public. can be obtained at this address. This publication contains two major sec­ The NElS uses the postal questionnaire as tions. The first part (table 1), which is the primary source of macroseismic data to carry mainly concerned with data obtained by seismo­ out an intensity survey; however, on-site field graphs, is a tabular listing of earthquakes in investigations are made following earthquakes chronological order by State, consisting of the that do significant damage. The "Earthquake following basic information: date, origin time, Report" forms are mailed to postmasters within hypocenter, magnitude, maximum intensity, and the area affected by the earthquake. The com­ computational source of the hypocenter. The pleted forms are returned to the NElS, where second section, which concerns intensity infor­ they are evaluated and intensity values are mation, consists of four maps, two photographs, assigned to individual locations. In the case and table 2. This section also contains informa­ of large or significant earthquakes, the inten­ tion on events that were felt but were not sity observations are plotted and isoseismal listed in the PDE because there was not enough maps are prepared. It should be pointed out instrumental data to obtain a solution. The that the isoseismals represent a general inten­ list of earthquakes in table 1 was compiled from sity level and that they do not necessarily those located in the United States or nearby agree with every individual observation. offshore areas that were published in the PDE; from aftershock studies carried out by the U.S. Geological Survey and other organizations; from DISCUSSION OF TABLES hypocenters in California above magnitude 3.0 supplied by the California Institute of Technol­ The parameters for the earthquakes in table ogy, Pasadena, the University of California, and table 2 include the date, origin time, Berkeley, and other offices of the u.s~ Geologi­ hypocenter (epicenter and focal depth), magni­ cal Survey; from hypocenters in Hawaii supplied tude, intensity, and source of the computed by the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory; and from solution. The origin time and date are listed other institutions as listed in the acknowledg­ in Universal Coordinated Time (UTC) and local ments. Known or suspected explosions are also standard time based on the time-zone maps in listed in table 1 and table 2. figures 2 and 3. The epicenters, which were taken from those published in the PDE, or from The intensities and macroseismic data were other sources as noted, are listed here to two compiled from information obtained
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download JANUARY 1980.Pdf
    JANUARY 1980 ---,. ­ LAW ENFORCEMENT BUllETIN JANUARY 1980, VOLUME 49, NUMBER 1 Contents Forensic Science 1 Speaker Identification (Part 1) Three Methods- Listening, Machine, and Aural­Visual By Bruce E. Koenig, Special Agent, Technical Services Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, D.C. 8 Hypnosis: The FBI's Team Approach By Richard L. Ault, Jr., Special Agent, Behavioral Science Unit, FBI Academy, Quantico, Va. Crime Problems 9 Automobile Theft: An Increasing Crime Problem By Samuel J. Rozzi, Commissioner of Police, Nassau County, N.Y. , and Det. Sgt. Richard Mueller, Police Department, Nassau County, N.Y. Facilities 14 The Canadian Police College By Charles W. Steinmetz, Special Agent, Education and Communication Arts Unit, FBI Academy, Quantico, Va. Point of View 19 Higher Education for Police Officers By Thomas A. Reppetto, Ph. D., Vice President and Professor of Criminal Justice Administration, John Jay College, New York, N.Y. The Legal Digest 28 The Constitutionality of Routine License Check Stops- A Review of Delaware v. Prouse By Daniel L. Schofield, Special Agent, Legal Counsel Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, D.C. 2S Wanted by the FBI The Cover: Federal Bureau of Investigation Published by the Public Affairs Office, Voiceprints­finger- United States Department of Justice Homer A. Boynton, Jr., prints of the future or Executive Assistant Director Washington, D.C. 20535 investigative tool for Editor-Thomas J. Deakin today? See story William H. Webster, Director Assistant Editor-Kathryn E. Sulewski page 1. Art Director-Carl A. Gnam, Jr. Writer/Editor-Karen McCarron The Attorney General has determined that the publication Production Manager-Jeffery L.
    [Show full text]
  • 3/1980 Report
    MARCH 1980 SURVEY March 28, 1980 Surveyso fConsume rAttitude s Richard T.Curtin , Director §> CONSUMER SENTIMENT FALLS TO NEW RECORD LOW LEVEL **In the March 1980 survey, the Index of Consumer Sentiment was 56.5,dow n more than 10 Index-points from February 1980 (66.9) and March 1979 (68.4), and represents the lowest level recorded in more than a quarter-century. At no time have consumers been more pessimistic about their ownpersona l financial situation or about prospects for the economy as a whole. Importantly, the major portion of these declines were recorded prior to President Carter's latest inflation message just 10 percent of the interviews were conducted after Carter's speech. **Among families with incomes of $15,000 and over, the Index of Consumer Senti­ ment was 51.3 in March 1980,dow n from 60.2 in February 1980, and 65.2i n March 1979. TheMarc h 1980 Index figure of 51.3 is below the prior record low of 53.6 recorded in February 1975. **New record low levels recorded in March 1980include : *Near1y half (48 percent) of all families reported in March 1980 that they were worse off financially than a year earlier, twice the propor­ tion whoreporte d an improved financial situation (24 percent). *Three-in-four respondents (76 percent) expected bad times financially for the economy as a whole during the next 12 months, while just 14 percent expected improvement. ^Interest rates were expected to increase during the next 12 months by 71 percent of all families in March 1980an d the highest rates of expected inflation were recorded during early 1980, with consumers expecting inflation to average 12% during the next 12 months.
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL AGREEMENT on 1 April 1980 TARIFFS and TRADE Limited Distribution
    RESTRICTED L/4914/Rev.1 GENERAL AGREEMENT ON 1 April 1980 TARIFFS AND TRADE Limited Distribution MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS Status of Acceptances of Protocols, Agreements and Arrangements (as of 31 March 1980) The following Protocols, Agreements and Arrangements have been accepted by the Governments listed on the dates and with the conditions specified. A. Geneva (1979) Protocol to the General.Agreement on Tariffs and Trade - Argentina 11 July 1979 - Austria subjectt to ratification) 17 October 1979 Ratification 28 December 1979 - Belgium (Subject to ratification) 17 December 1979 - Canada (subject to ratification) 11 July 1979 - Denmark (subject to ratification). 17 December 1979 Ratification with regard to the products 21 December 1979 subject to the regime of the European Coal and Steel Community and except as regards its application to the Faroe Islands. - European Economic Community 13 July 1979 (For authentification of the Protocol and of the schedules of tariff concessions annexed thereto, and subject to conclusion by the European Communities in accordance with the procedures in force) Acceptance 17 December 1979 - Finland (subject to ratification) 11 July 1979 Ratification 13 March 1980 - France 17 December 1979 - Germany, Fed. Rep. (subject to ratification) 17 December 1979 - Hungary 17 December 1979 - Iceland (subject to ratification) 18 September 1979 - Ireland 17 December 1979 - Israel (subject to ratification) 22 November 1979 - Italy 17 December 1979 - Jamaica 12 December 1979 - Japan (subject to acceptance) 27 July 1979 - Luxembourg 17 December 1979 L/4914/Rev.1 Page 2 - Netherlands 17 December 1979 The acceptance shall apply to the Kingdom in Europe only. However, the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands reserves the right to extend the acceptance of the-Protocol by written notification to the Netherlands Antilles at a later date.
    [Show full text]
  • Leaguer, February 1980
    Splish, splash Swimmer from across Texas will have an opportunity to make waves in what may well be the finest Olympic swim center in the nation —the University of Texas Swim Center. For the second consecu­ tive year, the center will house the UIL state swim meet. For full de­ tails, see page 6. The Leaguer USPS 267-840 The Official Publication of the University Interscholastic League VOL LXIV. NO. 7 FEBRUARY, 1980 AUSTIN. TEXAS 4,000-plus expected for ILPC convention Publications experts on tab for 53rd annual journalism festival More than 4,000 Texas high school Iowa; John Hudnall, ILPC yearbook operate at no cost to the delegates from business meetings and too little in the journalism students and advisers will critic from Omaha, Neb.; and Bill Sey­ 9 a.m. to 5 p.m." educational sessions. converge on Austin? March 21-22, for the mour, nationally reknown photographer Advantages of holding the convention "Our ILPC officers, Lisa Moore in par­ 53rd annual Interscholastic League Press from West Virginia University. during regular classes include greater ticular, drew up plans to conduct all busi­ Conference state convention. Also on the program is Ken Herman, access to University facilities, availabil­ ness on Friday, leaving voting delegates Student journalists, representing year­ reporter for the Associated Press in Aus­ ity of UT journalism faculty members, a full day of activity on Saturday," he book, newspaper, newsmagazine and lit­ tin who recently won a Pulitzer Prize for and ending the long weekend conflict with said. the Columbia Scholastic Press Associa­ erary magazine staffs statewide, will be his investigation of training abuses in As usual, sessions have been geared for tion meeting in New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Revitalization of Inner City Housing Through Property Tax Exemption: New York City’S J-51 to the Rescue Janice C
    Urban Law Annual ; Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law Volume 18 January 1980 Revitalization of Inner City Housing Through Property Tax Exemption: New York City’s J-51 to the Rescue Janice C. Griffith Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_urbanlaw Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Janice C. Griffith, Revitalization of Inner City Housing Through Property Tax Exemption: New York City’s J-51 to the Rescue, 18 Urb. L. Ann. 153 (1980) Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_urbanlaw/vol18/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Urban Law Annual ; Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REVITALIZATION OF INNER CITY HOUSING THROUGH PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION AND ABATEMENT: NEW YORK CITY'S J-51 TO THE RESCUE* JANICE C GRIFFITH* * I. INTRODUCTION A. The Rental Housing Situation in New York City in 1975 When the municipal bond market closed its door to New York City in the spring of 1975,' it shut out the city's program of providing mortgage loans to finance newly constructed and rehabilitated hous- ing for low- and middle-income people. New York City could no longer act as a banker; the principal resource upon2 which the city had relied to solve its housing problems was gone. Despite the infusion of more than one billion dollars over twenty * The opinions expressed in this Article are those of the author and do not neces- sarily represent those of New York City.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Assistance Corporation for the City of New York (MAC) Archive MAC
    Municipal Assistance Corporation for the City of New York (MAC) Archive MAC This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on June 14, 2019. Baruch College Archives, William and Anita Newman Library Digital Initiatives Librarian, Baruch College 1 Bernard Baruch Way New York, NY 10010 [email protected] URL: http://www.baruch.cuny.edu/library/alumni/archives.html Municipal Assistance Corporation for the City of New York (MAC) Archive MAC Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 7 Administrative History ................................................................................................................................... 7 Scope and Contents of the Collection ........................................................................................................... 8 Arrangement of the Collection ...................................................................................................................... 8 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 9 Collection Inventory ..................................................................................................................................... 10 Series 2: Board of Directors Meeting Minutes ......................................................................................... 10 June 1975-August 1975 .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unemployment '
    -----------~I-'2-GO- l UNEMPLOYMENT eurostatl3?ll Statistical Telegram 16 April 1980 Monthly Statistics of registered unemployed in the Community - March 1980 - As in previous years, with the ending of winter, the number of unemployed registered at public employment offices in the Community showed a considerable reduction. Between the end of February 1980 and the end of March 1980, total unemployment declined by 220,000 to 6.3 million. As afercentage of the civilian working populations... unemployment fell from 6.0% at the end o February to 5.8% at the end of March 19ij0. As with the reduction during February, so also was that of March mainly due to weather conditions. The seasonally corrected total was of the order of 6.2 million. In comparison with the previous month unemployment in the Community as a whole and in each Member State declined. For the Community as a whole this reduction amounted to 3.4%. In four Member States the reductions were well in excess of the Community average: F .R. of Germany (- 11.7%), Luxembourg (- 11.5%), the Netherlands (- 7 .4%) and Denmark (- 5.4%). In the other Member States, decreases in unemployment were below the Community average: France(- 2.4%), Italy and Belgium (each with- 1.4%), Ireland(- 0.9%) and the Umted Kingdom(- 0.8%). Compared with the corresponding month last year, total unemployment in the Community showed a rise of 2%. However, ttiere were differing trends in the individual Member States. Falls in unemployment occurred in : F.R. of Germany (- 8.5%), Luxembourg (- 5.0%), Denmark (- 4.1%) and Ireland (- 3.3%).
    [Show full text]
  • US Covert Operations Toward Iran, February-November 1979
    This article was downloaded by: [Tulane University] On: 05 January 2015, At: 09:36 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Middle Eastern Studies Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fmes20 US Covert Operations toward Iran, February–November 1979: Was the CIA Trying to Overthrow the Islamic Regime? Mark Gasiorowski Published online: 01 Aug 2014. Click for updates To cite this article: Mark Gasiorowski (2015) US Covert Operations toward Iran, February–November 1979: Was the CIA Trying to Overthrow the Islamic Regime?, Middle Eastern Studies, 51:1, 115-135, DOI: 10.1080/00263206.2014.938643 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2014.938643 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
    [Show full text]
  • ENTERING the 1980S: FISCAL POLICY CHOICES
    1 ENTERING THE 1980s: January 1980 FISCAL POLICY CHOICES A Report to the Senate and House Committees on the Budget NOTICE -Part I There Should Be No Release of This Document Until 10 a.m. (E.S.T.) As Required by Public Law 93-344 Tuesday, January 29, 1980 CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE ENTERING THE 1980s: FISCAL POLICY CHOICES The Congress of the United States Congressional Budget Office For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 PREFACE The Congressional Budget Office is required by Section 202(f) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-344) to submit an annual report on budgetary options. This year, the report is in two parts: Entering the 1980s; Fiscal Policy Choices and Five-Year Budget Projections; Fiscal Years 1981-1985. Part I, Entering the 1980s; Fiscal Policy Choices, is one of a series of reports on the state of the economy issued periodi- cally by the Congressional Budget Office. In accordance with CBO's mandate to provide objective analysis, the report contains no recommendations. The report was prepared by George Iden, Joan Schneider, Frank Russek, Stephen Zeller, Lawrence DeMilner, Nariman Behravesh, Peter Taylor, Marvin Phaup, Robert Dennis, William Pegram, Antoinette Gibbons, Peter Johnson, Susan Helper, and Carol Timko , under the direction of William J. Beeman and James E. Annable, Jr. Robert L. Faherty and Francis S. Pierce edited the manuscript; Dorothy J. Kornegay, Debra M. Blagburn, Kathleen M. Quinn, and Marsha L. Mottesheard patiently typed the many drafts. Alice M.
    [Show full text]
  • Maps Cited by Congress When Designating Wilderness
    Maps Summary Table In 2003 long-time NPS Wilderness Coordinator Wes Henry prepared this table that was intended for inclusion in the updated Reference Manual 41 – Wilderness Management. Wes died soon thereafter. PEER has updated the table to reflect information through 2014. RM 41: Section F: DRAFT January 21, 2003 Maps Cited by Congress when Designating Wilderness. The table lists in: Column 2: maps cited by Congress when designating NPS wilderness (in chronological order by date of enactment); Column 3: date of an official legal description prepared after designation, and Column 4: whether a post-enactment official boundary map was prepared. NPS AREA – CONGRESSIONAL DATE OF DATE OF WILDERNESS MAP NUMBER OFFICIAL OFFICAL MAP DATE AND DATE, CITED LEGAL IN LAW DESCRIPTION Craters of the 131-91,000 December 1970 NPS cited Moon – Oct. 1970 March 1970 legislative map Petrified Forest - NP-PF-3320-O December 1970 NPS cited October 1970 November 1967 legislative map Lava Beds – NM-LB-3227H December 1972 NPS cited October 1972 August 1972 legislative map Lassen Volcanic – NP-LV-9013C June 1973 NPS cited October 1972 August 1972 legislative map Point Reyes – 612-90,000-B May 1978 February 1977 October 1976 September 1976 Bandelier – 315-20,014-B August 1978 August 1978 October 1976 May 1976 Black Canyon of 144-20,017 January 1977 January 1977 the Gunnison – May 1973 October 1976 Chiricahua - 145-20,007-A May 1978 January 1977 October 1976 September 1973 Great Sand Dunes 140-20,006-C December 1976; January 1980 October 1976 February 1976 Revised:
    [Show full text]
  • WHCA Video Log
    WHCA Video Log Tape # Date Title Format Duration Network C1 9/23/1976 Carter/Ford Debate #1 (Tape 1) In Philadelphia, Domestic Issues BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 90 ABC C2 9/23/1976 Carter/Ford Debate #1 (Tape 2) In Philadelphia, Domestic Issues BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 ABC C3 10/6/1976 Carter/Ford Debate #2 In San Francisco, Foreign Policy BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 90 ABC C4 10/15/1976 Mondale/Dole Debate BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 90 NBC C5 10/17/1976 Face the Nation with Walter Mondale BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 CBS C6 10/22/1976 Carter/Ford Debate #3 At William & Mary, not complete BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 90 NBC C7 11/1/1976 Carter Election Special BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 ABC C8 11/3/1976 Composite tape of Carter/Mondale activities 11/2-11/3/1976 BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 CBS C9 11/4/1976 Carter Press Conference BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 ALL C10 11/7/1976 Ski Scene with Walter Mondale BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 WMAL C11 11/7/1976 Agronsky at Large with Mondale & Dole BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 WETA C12 11/29/1976 CBS Special with Cronkite & Carter BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 CBS C13 12/3/1976 Carter Press Conference BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 60 ALL C14 12/13/1976 Mike Douglas Show with Lillian and Amy Carter BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 60 CBS C15 12/14/1976 Carter Press Conference BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 60 ALL C16 12/14/1976 Barbara Walters Special with Peters/Streisand and Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 60 ABC Page 1 of 92 Tape # Date Title Format Duration Network C17 12/16/1976 Carter Press Conference BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 ABC C18 12/21/1976 Carter Press Conference BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 ALL C19 12/23/1976 Carter Press Conference BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 ABC C20 12/29/1976 Good Morning America with Carter and Cabinet Members (Tape 1) BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 60 ABC C21 12/29/1976 Good Morning America with Carter and Cabinet Members (Tape 2) Digital Files, Umatic 60 ABC C22 1/4/1977 Dinah Shore Show with Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
    RESTRICTED GENERAL AGREEMENT ON L/4914/Rev.4 25 June 1981 TARIFFS AND TRADE Limited Distribution MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS Status of Acceptances of Protocols/ Agreements and Arrangements (as- of 22 June 1981)1 The following Protocols, Agreements and Arrangements have been accepted by the Governments listed on the dates and with the conditions or declarations specified. A. Geneva (1979) Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade Argentina 11 July 1979 Austria (subject to ratification) 17 October 1979 Ratification 28 December 1979 Belgium (subject to ratification) 17 December 1979 Ratification 7 May 1981 Canada (subject to ratification) 11 July 1979 Czechoslovakia 16 June 1980 Denmark (subject to ratification) 17 December 1979 Ratification with regard to the products 21 December 1979 subject to the régime of the European Coal and Steel Community and except as regards its application to the Faroe Islands European Economic Community 13 July 1979 (For authentication of the Protocol and of the schedules of tariff concessions annexed thereto, and subject to conclusion by the European Communities in accordance with the procedures in force) Acceptance 17 December 1979 Finland (subject to ratification) 11 July 1979 Ratification 13 March 1980 France 17 December 1979 Germany, Fed. Rep. (subject to ratification) 17 December 1979 Ratification 7 November 1980 The Geneva (1979) Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade shall also apply to Berlin (West) with effect from the date on which it enters into force for the Federal Republic of Germany This document consolidates the information contained in docu­ ments L/4914/Rev.3 and Adds. 1-15.
    [Show full text]