DOCSLIB.ORG

Floodplain Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Floodplain Management Plan FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Region IX August 2007 County of San Diego Table of Contents Floodplain Management Plan August 2007 Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS..............................................................................................................................I LIST OF ACRONYMS................................................................................................................................V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... VII 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THIS DOCUMENT..................................................................... 1-1 1.2 THE FMP AND THE COMMUNITY RATING SYSTEM..................................................................... 1-1 1.3 GOALS OF THE FMP.................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 ORGANIZATION OF THE PLAN ..................................................................................................... 1-3 2.0 COUNTY PROFILE.................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 GEOGRAPHY, DEMOGRAPHICS, AND CLIMATE............................................................. 2-1 2.2 PLANNING AREA.......................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3 INFRASTRUCTURE ....................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.4 HYDROLOGY ............................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.5 WATERSHEDS ............................................................................................................................. 2-5 2.5.1. Otay River Watershed ....................................................................................................... 2-5 2.5.2. San Luis Rey Watershed ................................................................................................... 2-6 2.5.3. Santa Margarita Watershed ............................................................................................... 2-6 2.5.4. San Dieguito Watershed.................................................................................................... 2-7 2.5.5. Sweetwater River Watershed ............................................................................................ 2-7 2.5.6. San Diego Watershed........................................................................................................ 2-7 2.5.7. Tijuana Watershed............................................................................................................. 2-8 2.6 DEVELOPMENT TRENDS.............................................................................................................. 2-8 3.0 PLANNING PROCESS AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION .................................................... 3-1 3.1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 FMP WORKING GROUP .............................................................................................................. 3-1 3.3 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ............................................................................................................... 3-2 3.3.1 Press Release ......................................................................................................................... 3-2 3.3.2 Repetitive Loss Property Owners and Lessee Mailings......................................................... 3-2 3.3.3 Public Meeting....................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.3.4 Repetitive Loss Neighborhood Mailings ............................................................................... 3-3 3.3.5 Federal, State, Local, and Regional Agencies/organizations Survey..................................... 3-3 3.3.6 Survey of Adjacent Municipalities ........................................................................................ 3-4 3.4 PUBLIC COMMENTS..................................................................................................................... 3-5 3.5 EXISTING PLANS OR STUDIES REVIEWED....................................................................... 3-9 4.0 FLOODING HISTORY............................................................................................................... 4-1 5.0 FLOOD HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT..................................... 5-1 5.1 DEFINITION OF FLOOD......................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 FLOOD HAZARD RISK................................................................................................................ 5-2 5.3 FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS AND THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO FLOOD MAPS....................... 5-5 5.4 LOCALLY IDENTIFIED “HOT SPOT” FLOOD AREAS ..................................................................... 5-5 5.5 VULNERABLE STRUCTURES ........................................................................................................ 5-8 5.6 LOSS ESTIMATES ...................................................................................................................... 5-11 County of San Diego Table of Contents Floodplain Management Plan August 2007 Page ii 6.0 CAPABILITIES ASSESSMENT................................................................................................ 6-1 6.1 GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE......................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 COUNTY FACILITIES ................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.3 FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PROGRAM...................................................................................... 6-2 6.4 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM................................................................................ 6-2 6.5 DAM SAFETY .............................................................................................................................. 6-3 6.6 DEBRIS CONTROL PROGRAM ...................................................................................................... 6-3 6.7 EMERGENCY STORM RESPONSE.................................................................................................. 6-3 6.9 ALERT FLOOD WARNING SYSTEM ............................................................................................. 6-3 7.0 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................................... 7-1 8.0 PREVENTION MEASURES ...................................................................................................... 8-1 8.1 CURRENT PREVENTION MEASURES .............................................................................................. 8-1 8.1.1 General plan........................................................................................................................... 8-1 8.1.2 Zoning.................................................................................................................................... 8-3 8.1.3 Building Codes ...................................................................................................................... 8-4 8.1.4 Floodplain Construction Standards........................................................................................ 8-5 8.1.5 Alluvial Fan Regulations ....................................................................................................... 8-7 8.1.6 Floodplain Mapping/Data Maintenance ................................................................................ 8-9 8.1.7 Floodplain Open Space Preservation..................................................................................... 8-9 8.1.8 Low-Density Zoning............................................................................................................ 8-10 8.1.9 Subdivision Regulations ...................................................................................................... 8-11 8.2 PROPOSED PREVENTION MEASURES IN SAN DIEGO COUNTY.................................................... 8-12 8.2.1 Design/Regulatory Flood Elevation (Freeboard)................................................................. 8-12 8.2.2 Cumulative Substantial Improvement and Substantial Damage Regulations..................... 8-13 8.2.3 Critical Facilities Regulations.............................................................................................. 8-15 9.0 PROPERTY PROTECTION ...................................................................................................... 9-1 9.1 ACQUISITION AND DEMOLITION ................................................................................................. 9-1 9.1.1 Implementation Policies ........................................................................................................ 9-1 9.1.2 Acquisition Disadvantages ...................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Water Supply Assessment and Verification Report
    Water Supply Assessment and Verification Report Newland Sierra Specific Plan December 2015 (Revised - July 2016) Prepared for Vallecitos Water District This page is intentionally left blank. Water Supply Assessment and Verification Report Newland Sierra Specific Plan Contents 1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Findings ............................................................................................................................................... 3 3 Project Description .............................................................................................................................. 5 4 Vallecitos Water District .................................................................................................................... 11 5 Historical and Projected Water Demands ......................................................................................... 13 5.1 Demand Management ............................................................................................................. 14 5.1.1 BMP Categories ......................................................................................................... 14 5.1.2 Senate Bill X 7-7 ......................................................................................................... 16 6 Existing and Projected Supplies .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CAL FIRE Border Impact Statistics
    BORDER AGENCY FIRE COUNCIL The Harris Fire Year End Report 2007 1 2 What is BAFC? – The concerned citizens of the United States and Mexico formed the Border Agency Fire Council. It is a consortium of government and private entities, emergency responders, environmental specialists, law enforcement, fire protection, and elected officials. It began under emergency conditions and has proven to be an extremely successful collaboration. People are alive today because of BAFC. Threatened habitat is protected and even improved because of this program. An unprecedented bi-national mutual assistance agreement is in place and working because of this program. The members of BAFC have worked without judgment or malice toward their fellow human being. From the beginning, their motivation has been primarily to save lives and protect the sensitive habitat of the border area. Thirty-four organizations make up BAFC; a list of members is at the end of this report. The members meet quarterly during the winter and every six to eight weeks during fire season. They meet at the San Diego headquarters of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) in El Cajon, California. Through collaborative effort, they have altered the environment to allow better access into the wildland for emergency responders, while respecting the natural values of the area. They have enhanced communication among emergency responders on both sides of the U.S. - Mexico border. They have reached out to people in both countries with safety messages in Spanish and English. This report provides a brief description of the many projects the Council and agencies have accomplished this year and ongoing projects started in other years yet still active today.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Rainfall and Reservoirs
    Local Rainfall and Reservoirs San Diego County Reservoirs ORANGE COUNTY RIVERSIDE COUNTY RED MOUNTAIN SAN DIEGO COUNTY RESERVOIR Fallbrook 76 DIVERSIFICATION MORRO HILL RESERVOIR Local Storage: LAKE HENSHAW Enhancing Water 15 TURNER LAKE A Vital Water Supply Reliability Vista Resource Oceanside 78 DIXON LAKE MAERKLE RESERVOIR LAKE WOHLFORD San Marcos SUTHERLAND Carlsbad San Diego Escondido RESERVOIR County’s semiarid OLIVENHAIN RESERVOIR climate means that SAN DIEGUITO Encinitas RESERVOIR 5 truly wet years are LAKE HODGES LAKE RAMONA few and far between, Solana Beach LAKE POWAY CUYAMACA and dry years are very 15 RESERVOIR Del Mar 56 Poway SAN VICENTE RESERVOIR common. Since 1976, the EL CAPITAN MIRAMAR RESERVOIR amount of local surface RESERVOIR 805 Santee water used to help meet La Jolla 52 LAKE JENNINGS annual demand has been as 67 high as 140,300 acre-feet LAKE MURRAY El Cajon 163 LOVELAND 8 RESERVOIR and as low as 4,071 acre- La Mesa feet. Consequently, runoff from 5 San Diego 94 SWEETWATER RESERVOIR BARRETT LAKE Lemon local rainwater that flows into Coronado Grove reservoirs – commonly National City MORENA 54 RESERVOIR called surface water – Chula Vista AF = acre-foot LOWER OTAY RESERVOIR represents a vital One acre-foot is but small portion of 905 approximately San Diego County’s Maerkle, Red Mountain and Morro Hill store 325,900 gallons, MEXICO treated water and do not capture local runoff. enough to supply water supply needs. 2.5 single-family Over the past 10 years, an Enhancing Water Storage households of four average of about 7 percent of the Today, the Water Authority and its mem- for a year.
    [Show full text]
  • County of San Diego Guidelines for Determining
    COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING SIGNIFICANCE EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANS LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENT GROUP Department of Planning and Land Use Department of Public Works July 30, 2007 APPROVAL I hereby certify that these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Emergency Response Plans are a part of the County of San Diego, Land Use and Environment Group’s Guidelines for Determining Significance and were considered by the Director of Planning and Land Use, in coordination with the Director of Public Works on the 30th day of July, 2007. I hereby certify that these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Emergency Response Plans are a part of the County of San Diego, Land Use and Environment Group’s Guidelines for Determining Significance and have hereby been approved by the Deputy Chief Administrative Officer (DCAO) of the Land Use and Environment Group on the 30th day of July, 2007. The Director of Planning and Land Use is authorized to approve revisions to these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Emergency Response Plans, except any revisions to Chapter 4.0 must be approved by the DCAO. Approved, July 30, 2007 EXPLANATION These Guidelines for Determining Significance for Emergency Response Plans and information presented herein shall be used by County staff for the review of discretionary projects and environmental documents pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). These Guidelines present a range of quantitative, qualitative, and performance levels for particular environmental effects. Normally
    [Show full text]
  • San Vicente Dam Raise Complete
    CONTRACTOR NEWS & VIEWS San Vicente Dam Raise Complete JULY 2014 CONTENTS SAN VICENTE dam eature F 6 RAISE COMplETE In This Issue “Topping Out” <<for SDUSD’S César E. Chávez Campus CONSTRUCTION EXPO<< 2014 Page Page 11 20 Also Inside 12Page P.S. It’s the law. Avoid Solar Assault......................14 AVOIDING THE BATTlE OF lITIGATION Are you a good decision maker?....16 America, One Nation A Contractor News, Inc Publication Publisher: Sandra C. Caples Under God Tel: (760) 466-7790• 9921 Carmel Mountain Road #231 •San Diego, CA 92129• [email protected] Contractor News and Views is published monthly. The opinions and assertions contained herein are those of the authors. Reproduction, either whole or in part, is not permitted without the express consent of the publisher. Copyright 2014 by Contractor News and Views. All rights reserved. Mike Caples : Editor Jenny Caples : Graphic Design Advertising rates are available upon request. Call Mike at (760) 466-7790. Contractor News and Views is not responsible for content in ads submitted by advertisers. TBA Want to see photos from an event? This magazine was produced by: CNV has a new photo Website! Need Sales??? CALL CNV FOR AdveRTISING OPPORTUNITIES IN SAN DIEgo’S LEADING www.contractornews.photoshelter.com CONSTRUCTION MAGAZINES! Free downloads until 8/31/14 Tel: (760) 466-7790 Just enter password: 2014 www.contractor-news.com 760.466.7790 JULY 2014 CONTRACTOR NEWS 5 HISTORIC SAN VICENTE DAM RAISE PROJECT COMPLETED The largest water storage project in San Diego County history is complete, providing the region with a critical hedge against future water shortages.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Flood of 1927”
    “The Flood of 1927” A “big rain is coming,” predicted Henry Cooper, Escondido’s celebrated, amateur weather prognosticator. The “Escondido Weather Prophet,” as he was known,” spoke in early February 1927, predicting a major storm for later in the month. “We shall have copious rains all along the coast,” Cooper declared, “with assured runoff from a heavy mantle of snow in the mountains.” “Copious” indeed, were the rains that swept into the county beginning on Thursday, February 10. Two storms would last for seven days bringing the heaviest rainfall San Diego had seen since the famous “Rainmaker Flood” of January 1916. Dams would fill and overflow, Mission Valley would turn into a broad lake, and roads and bridges would disappear, isolating San Diego from the rest of world. Mission Valley, February 1927. San Diego Public Library The first storm drenched the county for three days, dropping nearly an inch of rain in the city of San Diego and bringing heavy snow to the mountains. Cooper’s prophecy seemed on the mark. A bigger storm arrived on Sunday, pushed by southeasterly winds reported at 28 miles per hour. Light rain fell along the coast but there were heavy downpours in the mountains. Lake Cuyamaca led the county with 7.5 inches of rain. By Monday, precipitation records were falling everywhere. In downtown San Diego, people were stunned by intense cloudbursts. At mid-day .80 of inch fell in forty-five minutes. One five- minute downpour measured .25 of an inch. Streets and buildings quickly flooded. Unused to driving in rainy streets, San Diegans plowed into swamped intersections.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Grebe Aechmophorus Occidentalis in the Middle of The
    Grebes — Family Podicipedidae 103 Western Grebe Aechmophorus occidentalis In the middle of the 20th century, the Western Grebe was just a winter visitor to San Diego County, com- mon on salt water along the coast. It continues as one of the most abundant winter visitors on San Diego Bay and the ocean near shore. Since the 1950s it has taken on an additional role as a locally common breeding species, colonizing an increasing number of lakes and lagoons with fringing marshes. The Western Grebe is an outstanding example of a bird that has taken advantage of the need for San Diego County’s human population to import and manage vast quantities of fresh water. Photo by Anthony Mercieca Breeding distribution: As of 2001, the Western Grebe was up to six nesting sites in San Diego County. At ing a fledgling, 30 July 2001 (P. A. Ginsburg). At Buena O’Neill Lake, Camp Pendleton (E6), the birds were sum- Vista Lagoon (H5/H6) the grebes have nested since at mering by 1997 and first confirmed breeding in 1999. least 1997 (K. Messer), both east and west of Interstate The numbers there are still small, maximum 12, includ- 5. Numbers in spring and summer are sometimes large, 104 Grebes — Family Podicipedidae Nesting: For its nest, the Western Grebe makes a pile of cattail leaves and other aquatic vegetation, normally in the water if not actually floating. Some nests are visible from lakeshores, but most of our confirmations of Western Grebe breeding were of chicks, often riding on their par- ents’ backs. Shortly after hatching, Western Grebe chicks leave the nest and climb onto the adults’ backs.
    [Show full text]
  • San Vicente Pumped Storage Project
    20141016-5175 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 10/16/2014 2:27:10 PM BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PERMIT SAN VICENTE PUMPED STORAGE PROJECT SUBMITTED BY: San Diego County Water Authority 4677 Overland Avenue San Diego, California 92123 October 2014 20141016-5175 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 10/16/2014 2:27:10 PM 20141016-5175 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 10/16/2014 2:27:10 PM TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INITIAL STATEMENT 1 EXHIBIT 1 – DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT 10 1.0 Introduction, Background, and Project Configuration 10 2.0 Reservoirs 11 3.0 Transmission Line and Interconnection 13 4.0 Project Capacity 13 5.0 Public Lands 14 6.0 Other Information 15 EXHIBIT 2 – STUDY PLAN 16 1.0 General Requirement 16 1.1 Project Studies 16 1.2 New Roads 22 2.0 New Dam Construction Work Plan 22 2.1 Field Studies Impacts 22 2.2 Proposed Schedule 22 2.3 New Dam Construction 24 3.0 Waiver 24 4.0 Statement of Costs and Financing 24 4.1 Estimated Costs 24 4.2 Financing 24 4.3 Proposed Market for Power Generation 24 EXHIBIT 3 – PROJECT MAPS/DRAWINGS 26 Figure 1 Location Map Figure 2 Regional Map of Water Authority Service Area Figure 3 Project Study Area Figure 4 FERC Project Boundary Area Figure 4a Upper Reservoir Alternatives Configuration Figure 5 San Vicente Dam & Reservoir Raise Plan Figure 6 Typical Site Profile Figure 7 SDG&E Sunrise Powerlink Figure 8 Land Ownership Map Figure 9 New Saddle Dams – Upper Reservoir Figure 10 Transmission Line and Interconnection Alignment ATTACHMENT 1 – Legal Authority of Applicant as a Municipality (County Water Authority Act) 2014 Page 1 20141016-5175 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 10/16/2014 2:27:10 PM INITIAL STATEMENT BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PERMIT 1.0 The San Diego County Water Authority (Water Authority) applies to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for a preliminary permit for the proposed San Vicente Pumped-Storage Project (Project), as described in the attached exhibits.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Survey Report for Lake Hodges Water Quality and Quagga
    Atkins North America, Inc. 3570 Carmel Mountain Road, Suite 300 San Diego, California 92130 Telephone: +1.858.874.1810 Fax: +1.858.259.0741 www.atkinsglobal.com/northamerica Title: A Historical Survey Report for Lake Hodges Water Quality and Quagga Mitigation Measure Project, San Diego, California Contract/Task Order Number: As-Needed Environmental Services Contract H125692/Task Order #16 Prepared for: Summer Adleberg, Environmental Biologist City of San Diego Public Utilities Department 9192 Topaz Way San Diego, CA 92123 Prepared By: Atkins 3570 Carmel Mountain Road, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92130 Author: Sandra Pentney, M.A., RPA Principal Investigator/Associate Project Manager Michael M. DeGiovine Archaeologist/Field Technician Date: June 14, 2016 USGS: 7.5-minute Quadrangles: Escondido and Rancho Santa Fe, California, T13S, R2W, Section 18 Keywords: Cultural Resources, Lake Hodges Reservoir, San Diego, California, ISO-01, ISO-02, ISO-03 Ms. Summer Adleberg City of San Diego PUD June 14, 2016 Page 2 of 17 Contents I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ................................................................... 3 Project Description .......................................................................................................... 3 Project Location ............................................................................................................... 3 II. SETTING ......................................................................................................................... 3 Natural Setting ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3 Biological Resources
    Section 3 Biological Resources SECTION 3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.1 EXISTING INFORMATION Three primary sources of information were used to describe the existing biological conditions in Escondido: (1) the regional MHCP digital database, developed by Ogden Environmental and Energy Services Co., Inc. (Ogden) and the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG); (2) environmental documents provided by the City of Escondido; and (3) A Guide to the Sensitive Plants and Animals of Escondido (Dillane et al. 1995). The regional database provided the following layers: vegetation communities, sensitive species locations (primarily sightings from 1985 through 1994), roads and parcel boundaries, and topographic and other features. This database was updated in 1998 using recent environmental documents provided by the City of Escondido. These documents included environmental impact reports, biological technical reports, letter reports detailing results of biological surveys, mitigation plans, and habitat management plans that provided sensitive species locations and vegetation maps. Potential wildlife movement corridors and habitat linkages were evaluated using vegetation maps, sensitive species locations, MHCP habitat evaluation maps, aerial photographs, and a discussion paper entitled Potential Biotic Corridors in the Escondido Area (Dudek & Associates and Michael Brandman Associates 1991). Factors considered in this assessment included topography, quantity and quality of native habitats, and the location and biological requirements of target species. Additional details on methodology are provided in the MHCP Plan. 3.2 DISTRIBUTION OF NATURAL HABITATS IN ESCONDIDO Located approximately 12 miles from the coast in northern San Diego County, the City of Escondido is a biologically unique area where inland flora and fauna integrate with more coastal forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Raven Corvus Corax the World's Largest Passerine, the Common Raven Is a Common Permanent Resident of San Diego County
    Crows and Jays — Family Corvidae 383 Common Raven Corvus corax The world’s largest passerine, the Common Raven is a common permanent resident of San Diego County. It occurs in all habitats, from beaches to mountain- tops to desert floor. The change in the raven is less dramatic than that of the American Crow, but the raven too is on the increase, aided by increases in man-made food sources like refuse and road kills and man-made nest sites like buildings, bridges, and power-line towers. Breeding distribution: After the House Finch, the Common Raven is the most widespread breeding bird in San Diego County. Field work for this atlas identified it Photo by Anthony Mercieca as possibly breeding in 475 of 478 covered squares, and as confirmed breeding in 359. Ravens breed as dispersed pairs, but flocks may be seen through the breeding sea- son. Such flocks presumably consist of immature birds; ravens do not breed until they are at least two years old (A. M. Rea). Sites of frequent large concentrations are Warner Valley (up to 175 east of Lake Henshaw, G18, 12 May 2001, T. Stands), Torrey Pines State Reserve (N7; up to 62 on 3 April 1998, K. Estey), and from Potrero to Canyon City (U20/U21; up to 180 near Canyon City several on cliffs of both rock and eroded earth. Large 21 June 1999, D. C. Seals). In some cases, including the trees are also frequent nest sites; atlas observers reported last, the reason for the concentration was a communal raven nests in coast live oaks, palms, eucalyptus, athel roost.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 4.10 – Hydrology and Water Quality
    4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality 4.10 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This section evaluates the hydrology and water quality impacts of the proposed Plan. The information presented was compiled from multiple sources, including Project Clean Water (PCW), the County of San Diego, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), and the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). 4.10.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS HYDROLOGY Surface Hydrology Surface waters in the San Diego region include the ocean shoreline, bays, lagoons, lakes, reservoirs, playas/inundation areas/washes, streams, and rivers (Figure 4.10-1). Major rivers within the San Diego region include the Santa Margarita River, the San Luis Rey River, San Dieguito River, San Diego River, Sweetwater River, Otay River, and the Tijuana River. Major coastal waterbodies include Buena Vista Lagoon, Agua Hedionda Lagoon, Batiquitos Lagoon, San Elijo Lagoon, San Dieguito Lagoon, Los Peñasquitos Lagoon, Mission Bay, San Diego Bay, Tijuana River estuary, and the Pacific Ocean. Playas/ inundation areas/washes include areas surrounding Lake Henshaw, Lake Cuyamaca, Moreno Reservoir, and Lake Hodges as shown in Figure 4.10-1. Surface waters in the San Diego region have many uses, including but not limited to habitat for wildlife, recreation, and storage reservoirs for drinking water supply. Waters listed as impaired under CWA Section 303(d) (33 USC Section 1313[d]) are also shown in Figure 4.10-1. A description of the 303(d) list is provided in Section 4.10.2 Regulatory Setting. Watersheds and Hydrological Characteristics The San Diego region is divided into two hydrologic basins by the northwest-trending Peninsular Range.
    [Show full text]