DOCSLIB.ORG

Norfolk Area Ramblers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Ramblers Norfolk Area Newsletter & Walks Programme August - November 2018 http://www.norfolkra.org.uk/ AREA OFFICE: Our Area Secretary is Ken Hawkins, the address for area correspondence is 26 Hillfields, Dereham NR19 1UE. The phone number is 07505 426750 and the email address is [email protected] Path Problems in Norfolk, where sure of your details, can be reported directly to: Rights of Way Team, Planning & Transportation Dept, Norfolk County Council, County Hall, Martineau Lane, Norwich, NR1 2SG. (Telephone: 0344 800 8020.) You can also report them online via the map at http://maps.norfolk.gov.uk/highways/ - find the path, click on it, and follow the instructions. (If you need more information, go first to https://www.norfolk.gov.uk/out-and-about-in-norfolk/public-rights-of-way/about-public-rights-of-way - the map is at the bottom of the page. Where a member is unsure, or the problem is not clear, report the problem to Ian Mitchell, 5 Montcalm Road, Norwich, NR1 4HX. (Telephone: 01603 622539, email address: [email protected]) Ian would also like to know anything directly reported to the Rights of Way Team. Acting Area News Editor: Richard May, 24 Swanton Avenue, Dereham, NR19 2HJ. Telephone 01362 709044, email address is [email protected]. All Ramblers members are invited to take part in any walk in the Area programme. Non- members are welcome to participate and are invited to join the Ramblers if they so desire once they have sampled the variety of walks on offer. New members can join or existing members can update their details (change of group, change of name or address) by phoning Ramblers Central Office in London on 020 7339 8500 . You can also join on the Ramblers website: http://www.ramblers.org.uk. The next deadline for copy for the newsletter is 13th October 2018. The deadline for copy for the following newsletter will be 9th February 2019. The remaining Area Council meeting in 2018 will be 10th November at 10:00 at Honingham Village Hall. RAMBLERS CENTRAL OFFICE The address of the Ramblers’ Central Office is: 2nd Floor, Camelford House, 87—90 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7TW Tel: 020 7339 8500, Fax: 020 7339 8501 email [email protected] The Norfolk Area, Ramblers , is part of The Ramblers, a registered charity (number 1093577), and a company limited by guarantee (registration number 4458492) The Ramblers’ Norfolk Area Action required if you want to hear from us! Don’t forget to sign up for our email list, if you haven’t already. Go to the link below, give us your name and email address, and then you can sign up to whichever emails you want to receive. www.norfolkra.org.uk/MailListSignup Richard May Footpath Secretaries needed Norfolk Area of the Ramblers needs some more Footpath Secretaries in or- der to spread the work of looking after public paths, and also for succession purposes. How good is your map reading? Can you read a planning application which does not mention a path which should be crossing the site? Can you write to explain why a path will need to be changed if there is a plan to build houses on a certain site? Can you write to explain why you think that the course of a path should not be changed? Can you object to a path order where the width is not what it should be? What should it be? Learn the answers to the last two questions from the Blue Book on Rights of Way law, which you will be supplied with if you become a Footpath Secre- tary. Some of the previous questions you will have a feel for already but may need some tuition and practice. If interested contact Ian Mitchell via the means shown in the middle of the front page. Ian Mitchell 2 Newsletter & Walks Programme August to November 2018 Rights of Way Sub-committee- What happens? The officers, group representatives and interested parties attend three meetings a year, which are our area council meetings for Norfolk Area Ramblers. We also have a rights of way sub-committee which meets a similar number of times a year to discuss matters of importance to the paths network. This sub-committee met last week, and in a bid to help explain what goes on, and the importance of the committee, we’ve (many thanks to Ken, the area secretary) put together a short summary of what took place. For anyone who is interested in this type of work, do let us know, we need help in numerous areas such as footpath officers, assistance with 2026 and help monitoring planning applications. At the meeting, representatives from across the county considered a range of issues, the following amongst them. 1 – Big Pathwatch: the Big Pathwatch app is still active, though now used only by a small number of people – only 200 adverse reports were received in the last 18 month, many from just a couple of individuals (who are not identifiable to us). Reports of the problems are sent on to Norfolk County Council (NCC), but we are not clear about the extent to which they are used. We have asked Central Office about their use of the data, and are told that they were working on getting the information live on the website to show the different problems that are being reported across the country. It was noted that this was separate to the Big Pathwatch report which was carried out in a systematic way to show the condition of the footpath network at one point in time. We are planning to add path names to the reports we receive to see what use we can make of them. Our main concern is that, as we are unsure of the use to which NCC puts the reports, we continue to urge everyone encountering an issue to report it directly to NCC, ideally through the online reporting system, which has been improved recently. 2 – Norfolk Local Access Forum: two of our members (Ken Hawkins and Vic Cocker) are also members of the LAF. Ken, who chairs the LAF Public Rights of Way Subgroup, reported to the Subcommittee on a number of issues being taken to the next LAF meeting in July: 3 The Ramblers’ Norfolk Area (i) – agreement to put a proposal to get NCC Departments (and later others) to formulate a vision of Norfolk as a quality destination for walkers and others, using the tourism and health (including the financial side) benefits, including better co-ordinated use of volunteers (via proposed parish seminars), all based on the Norfolk Access Improvement Plan (currently going through the final stages of approval) (ii) – NCC concerns about how it manages roll back of the England Coast Path where there is rapid erosion – NCC is seeking guidance from Natural England on methodology (iii) – Parish Council seminars to bring together all volunteers and work for public rights of way; the first is planned for October 3 – Actual and proposed changes to the public rights of way network: the Subcommittee reviewed a number of changes, where necessary agreeing the response to be made by The Ramblers. This work depends heavily on the activity of Ian Mitchell, our Footpath Co-ordinator, in maintaining awareness of what is happening, making visits where needed, and presenting the relevant information to the subcommittee for comment. 4 – Restoring the record: Ian also reported on his involvement with the national Ramblers ‘2026’ work, under the title Don’t Lose You Way. He continues to attend a Volunteer Board meeting, roughly every two months. 5 – England Coast Path: responses to the consultation on the route from Weybourne to Hunstanton were noted; both we and NCC were concerned particularly about (1) access to the salt marsh areas in a number of places where Natural England proposed to restrict or ban access, (2) the derisory sum offered for the establishment of the route and (3) the proposal to route the path alongside the A149 near Titchwell. Julian White, reproduced from the Norfolk Area Ramblers Blog blog.norfolkra.orrg.uk 4 Newsletter & Walks Programme August to November 2018 Work Party Volunteers We are now starting on projects replacing Boardwalks and new boardwalks And for clearing blocked footpaths We are always looking for volunteers Contact peter on 07905565750 [email protected] Path Changes Postwick FP2 With the near completion of the NDR (renamed Broadland Northway if it will stick), Postwick Footpath 2 which comes south from Smee Lane is officially diverted when it is close to one of the new rounda- bouts onto a footway beside the new road southward to the next rounda- bout, where it ends. From this point footways or cycleways can be followed by bridge across the A47 to a complex traffic light junction. Here the op- tions appear to be a footway/cycleway eastward then taking a lane into Postwick, or a footway/cycleway northwest back across the A47 via another bridge. Buxton FP12, FP13, FP14 Broadland District Council recently dedicated Footpath 12 through some amenity woodland it owns off Back Lane, Buxton with 2 short arms to local housing roads Woodland Walk and Bulwer Road. Broome FP7 The entry for Broome Footpath 7 off Yarmouth Road is likely to be altered to the southwest because some houses are going to be put on the land where it starts at present. Seething FP12 The entry for Seething Footpath 12 off Seething Street is like- ly to be altered because houses are to be erected along this part of the Street, so that the path will go down the edge of the first garden to reach the field behind and then take a slightly different angle across the field to its present exit.
Recommended publications

  • Appropriate Assessment (Submission)

    June 2007 North Norfolk District Council Planning Policy Team Telephone: 01263 516318 E-Mail: [email protected] Write to: Jill Fisher, Planning Policy Manager, North Norfolk District Council, Holt Road, Cromer, NR27 9EN www.northnorfolk.org/ldf All of the LDF Documents can be made available in Braille, large print or in other languages. Please contact 01263 516321 to discuss your requirements. Core Strategy Appropriate Assessment (Submission) Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 The Appropriate Assessment Process 4 3 Consultation and Preparation 5 4 Evidence gathering for the Appropriate Assessment 6 European sites that may be affected 6 Characteristics and conservation objectives of the European sites 8 Other relevant plans or projects 25 5 Appropriate Assessment and Plan analysis 28 Tables Table 4.1 - Broadland SPA/SAC qualifying features 9 Table 4.2 - Great Yarmouth North Denes SPA/SAC 12 Table 4.3 - North Norfolk Coast SPA/SAC qualifying features 15 Table 4.4 - Norfolk Valley Fens SAC qualifying features 19 Table 4.5 - Overstrand Cliffs SAC qualifying features 21 Table 4.6 - Paston Great Barn SAC qualifying features 23 Table 4.7 - River Wensum SAC qualifying features 24 Table 4.8 - Neighbouring districts Core Strategy progress table 27 Table 5.1 - Screening for likely significant effects 29 Table 5.2 - Details of Settlements in policies SS1, SS3, SS5 and SS7 to SS14 and how policy amendments have resulted in no likely significant effects being identified 35 Maps Map 4.1 - Environmental Designations 7 Map 4.2 - Broadland Environmental
  • Tourism Benefit & Impacts Analysis in the Norfolk Coast Area Of

    Tourism Benefit & Impacts Analysis in the Norfolk Coast Area Of

    TOURISM BENEFIT & IMPACTS ANALYSIS IN THE NORFOLK COAST AREA OF OUTSTANDING NATURAL BEAUTY APPENDICES May 2006 A Report for the Norfolk Coast Partnership Prepared by Scott Wilson NORFOLK COAST PARTNERSHIP TOURISM BENEFIT & IMPACTS ANALYSIS IN THE NORFOLK COAST AREA OF OUTSTANDING NATURAL BEAUTY APPENDICES May 2006 Prepared by Checked by Authorised by Scott Wilson Ltd 3 Foxcombe Court, Wyndyke Furlong, Abingdon Business Park, Abingdon Oxon, OX14 1DZ Tel: +44 (0) 1235 468700 Fax: +44 (0) 1235 468701 Norfolk Coast Partnership Tourism Benefit & Impacts Analysis in the Norfolk Coast AONB Scott Wilson Contents 1 A1 - Norfolk Coast Management ...............................................................1 2 A2 – Asset & Appeal Audit ......................................................................12 3 A3 - Tourism Plant Audit..........................................................................25 4 A4 - Market Context.................................................................................34 5 A5 - Economic Impact Assessment Calculations ....................................46 Norfolk Coast Partnership Tourism Benefit & Impacts Analysis in the Norfolk Coast AONB Scott Wilson Norfolk Coast AONB Tourism Impact Analysis – Appendices 1 A1 - Norfolk Coast Management 1.1 A key aspect of the Norfolk Coast is the array of authority, management and access organisations that actively participate, through one means or another, in the use and maintenance of the Norfolk Coast AONB, particularly its more fragile sites. 1.2 The aim of the
  • Norfolk Boreas Limited Document Reference: 5.1.9.17 Pursuant to APFP Regulation: 5(2)(Q)

    Norfolk Boreas Limited Document Reference: 5.1.9.17 Pursuant to APFP Regulation: 5(2)(Q)

    Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Consultation Report Appendix 9.17 Norfolk Boreas Onshore Ecology and Ornithology outgoing documents Applicant: Norfolk Boreas Limited Document Reference: 5.1.9.17 Pursuant to APFP Regulation: 5(2)(q) Date: June 2019 Revision: Version 1 Author: Copper Consultancy Photo: Ormonde Offshore Wind Farm This page is intentionally blank. Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Appendices Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Environmental Impact Assessment Onshore Ecology and Ornithology Method Statement Document Reference: PB5640-004-005 Author: Royal HaskoningDHV Date: January 2018 Applicant: Norfolk Boreas Ltd Date Issue Remarks / Reason for Issue Author Checked Approved No. 10/11/2017 01D Internal draft for review GC DT AD 13/11/2017 02D Second Draft GC DT 20/11/2017 03D Draft provided to Vattenfall for review GC DT JL 19/02/2018 01F Issue to consultees GC CD JL 30/01/2018 02F Removed reference to agreement on odonata GC CD CD surveys in section 1.2.3. This method statement has been prepared by Royal HaskoningDHV on behalf of Norfolk Boreas Limited in order to build upon the information provided within the Norfolk Boreas Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Scoping Report. It has been produced following a full review of the Scoping Opinion provided by the Planning Inspectorate. All content and material within this document is draft for stakeholder consultation purposes, within the Evidence Plan Process. Many participants of the Norfolk Boreas Evidence Plan Process will also have participated in the Norfolk Vanguard Evidence Plan Process. This document is presented as a complete standalone document however in order to maximise resource and save duplication of effort, the main areas of deviation from what has already been presented through the Norfolk Vanguard Evidence Plan Process and PEIR or in the Norfolk Boreas Scoping Report are presented in orange text throughout this document.
  • Norfolk Through a Lens

    Norfolk Through a Lens

    NORFOLK THROUGH A LENS A guide to the Photographic Collections held by Norfolk Library & Information Service 2 NORFOLK THROUGH A LENS A guide to the Photographic Collections held by Norfolk Library & Information Service History and Background The systematic collecting of photographs of Norfolk really began in 1913 when the Norfolk Photographic Survey was formed, although there are many images in the collection which date from shortly after the invention of photography (during the 1840s) and a great deal which are late Victorian. In less than one year over a thousand photographs were deposited in Norwich Library and by the mid- 1990s the collection had expanded to 30,000 prints and a similar number of negatives. The devastating Norwich library fire of 1994 destroyed around 15,000 Norwich prints, some of which were early images. Fortunately, many of the most important images were copied before the fire and those copies have since been purchased and returned to the library holdings. In 1999 a very successful public appeal was launched to replace parts of the lost archive and expand the collection. Today the collection (which was based upon the survey) contains a huge variety of material from amateur and informal work to commercial pictures. This includes newspaper reportage, portraiture, building and landscape surveys, tourism and advertising. There is work by the pioneers of photography in the region; there are collections by talented and dedicated amateurs as well as professional art photographers and early female practitioners such as Olive Edis, Viola Grimes and Edith Flowerdew. More recent images of Norfolk life are now beginning to filter in, such as a village survey of Ashwellthorpe by Richard Tilbrook from 1977, groups of Norwich punks and Norfolk fairs from the 1980s by Paul Harley and re-development images post 1990s.
  • Contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (Are Distinguished by Letter Code, Given Below) Those from 1801-13 Have Also Been Transcribed and Have No Code

    Contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (Are Distinguished by Letter Code, Given Below) Those from 1801-13 Have Also Been Transcribed and Have No Code

    Norfolk Family History Society Norfolk Marriages 1801-1837 The contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (are distinguished by letter code, given below) those from 1801-13 have also been transcribed and have no code. ASt All Saints Hel St. Helen’s MyM St. Mary in the S&J St. Simon & St. And St. Andrew’s Jam St. James’ Marsh Jude Aug St. Augustine’s Jma St. John McC St. Michael Coslany Ste St. Stephen’s Ben St. Benedict’s Maddermarket McP St. Michael at Plea Swi St. Swithen’s JSe St. John Sepulchre McT St. Michael at Thorn Cle St. Clement’s Erh Earlham St. Mary’s Edm St. Edmund’s JTi St. John Timberhill Pau St. Paul’s Etn Eaton St. Andrew’s Eth St. Etheldreda’s Jul St. Julian’s PHu St. Peter Hungate GCo St. George Colegate Law St. Lawrence’s PMa St. Peter Mancroft Hei Heigham St. GTo St. George Mgt St. Margaret’s PpM St. Peter per Bartholomew Tombland MtO St. Martin at Oak Mountergate Lak Lakenham St. John Gil St. Giles’ MtP St. Martin at Palace PSo St. Peter Southgate the Baptist and All Grg St. Gregory’s MyC St. Mary Coslany Sav St. Saviour’s Saints The 25 Suffolk parishes Ashby Burgh Castle (Nfk 1974) Gisleham Kessingland Mutford Barnby Carlton Colville Gorleston (Nfk 1889) Kirkley Oulton Belton (Nfk 1974) Corton Gunton Knettishall Pakefield Blundeston Cove, North Herringfleet Lound Rushmere Bradwell (Nfk 1974) Fritton (Nfk 1974) Hopton (Nfk 1974) Lowestoft Somerleyton The Norfolk parishes 1 Acle 36 Barton Bendish St Andrew 71 Bodham 106 Burlingham St Edmond 141 Colney 2 Alburgh 37 Barton Bendish St Mary 72 Bodney 107 Burlingham
  • Hempton to South Creake Cable Route Hempton, Dunton, Sculthorpe and South Creake Norfolk

    Hempton to South Creake Cable Route Hempton, Dunton, Sculthorpe and South Creake Norfolk

    Hempton to South Creake Cable Route Hempton, Dunton, Sculthorpe and South Creake Norfolk Programme of Archaeological Recording for Lark Energy CA Project: 660529 CA Report: 15762 SMS and Earthwork Survey Event No: ENF138499 Watching Brief Event No: ENF138543 October 2015 Hempton to South Creake Cable Route Hempton, Dunton, Sculthorpe and South Creake Norfolk Programme of Archaeological Recording CA Project: 660529 CA Report: 15762 Document Control Grid Revision Date Author Checked by Status Reasons for Approved revision by A 15/10/2015 SRJ SCC Internal SCC review This report is confidential to the client. Cotswold Archaeology accepts no responsibility or liability to any third party to whom this report, or any part of it, is made known. Any such party relies upon this report entirely at their own risk. No part of this report may be reproduced by any means without permission. © Cotswold Archaeology © Cotswold Archaeology Hempton to South Creake cable route: Programme of Archaeological Recording CONTENTS SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 2 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 3 2. ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND ................................................................ 4 3. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................... 5 4. METHODOLOGY ..............................................................................................
  • Artathon List of Artworks

    Artathon List of Artworks

    ARTATHON Artathon is a map that LIST OF ARTWORKS provides routes around Ipswich’s public sculptures at a range of different distances. The sculptures represent Ipswich’s maritime, industrial and sporting heritage both through the artwork and the landscape that is walked through. The trail offers a variety of environments to enjoy, including Christchurch Park, the regenerated riverside development and the town centre. The map has five rings linked loosely to the five Olympic rings to tie into London 2012. Routes are designed to be walked, jogged, run or cycled. GILES FAMILY 1993 Queens Street Miles Robinson 1 Fibre-glass resin Express Group Newspaper This statue shows “Grandma” and various other characters from his well-known cartoon strip. Is there a local connection? Well yes, because for many years he used a first floor office that looked down on the area where the statue is now. Robinson was approached by the Ipswich Promotion Bureau to design and make the ‘Giles Family’ sculpture which was sponsored by Express Groups Newspapers. It was unveiled in September 1993 by comedian Warren Mitchell in the presence of Johnny Speight and Carl Giles himself. Born in Ipswich in 1952, Miles Robinson studied at Ipswich School of Art and at Bournemouth and Poole College of Art. He then ran a studio in Dorset for two years before returning to Ipswich, taking classes at Suffolk College and teaching sculpture privately from his own studio near Ipswich. MADONNA 1990 Lady Lane 2 Robert Mellamphy Bronze This bronze on the wall in Lady Lane closely resembles the oaken statue which was once in the pilgrim chapel of Our Lady of Grace on this site in medieval times.
  • Accounting for National Nature Reserves

    Accounting for National Nature Reserves

    Natural England Research Report NERR078 Accounting for National Nature Reserves: A Natural Capital Account of the National Nature Reserves managed by Natural England www.gov.uk/naturalACCOUNTING FOR-england NATIONAL NATURE RESERVES Natural England Research Report NERR078 Accounting for National Nature Reserves: A Natural Capital Account of the National Nature Reserves managed by Natural England Tim Sunderland1, Ruth Waters1, Dan Marsh2, Cat Hudson1 and Jane Lusardi1 Published 21st February 2019 1 Natural England 2 University of Waikato, New Zealand This report is published by Natural England under the Open Government Licence - OGLv3.0 for public sector information. You are encouraged to use, and reuse, information subject to certain conditions. For details of the licence visit Copyright. Natural England photographs are only available for non commercial purposes. If any other information such as maps or data cannot be used commercially this will be made clear within the report. ISBN 978-1-78354-518-6 © Natural England 2018 ACCOUNTING FOR NATIONAL NATURE RESERVES Project details This report should be cited as: SUNDERLAND, T., WATERS, R.D., MARSH, D. V. K., HUDSON, C., AND LUSARDI, J. (2018). Accounting for National Nature Reserves: A natural capital account of the National Nature Reserves managed by Natural England. Natural England Research Report, Number 078 Project manager Tim Sunderland Principal Specialist in Economics Horizon House Bristol BS1 5TL [email protected] Acknowledgements We would like to thank everyone who contributed to this report both within Natural England and externally. ii Natural England Research Report 078 Foreword England’s National Nature Reserves (NNRs) are the crown jewels of our natural heritage.
  • The Cromer Moraine

    The Cromer Moraine

    THE CROMER MORAINE - A STUDY OF ITS PROGRESSIVE RECLAMATION ELIZABETH LANGTON ProQuest Number: 10097240 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10097240 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ilBSTRAGT The Cromer Moraine forms a distinctive geographical region near the coast of the northern part of the County of Norfolk. A pro­ nounced characteristic of this region is the vridespread cover of heatb-land, far less extensive than in former times. This heathland appears in its turn to have developed from an original woodland cover which was destroyed by the depredations of man and his domesticated animals . It has been necessary first to delimit the region as accurately as possible and this has been accomplished by means of a detailed study of local topography and of well-sections. The earliest evidence of the location of heathland comes from tlie Domesday Survey and this has been confirmed by references to heathland in various other documents dovm to 1750. By the middle of the eighteenth century the new developments in agriculture^ or ’Norfolk Husbandry’ as it was called, became widely known and practised, resulting in this region in a greatly accelerated reclama­ tion of heathland; so that by the time of the Tithe Survey (183S-42) less than a hundred years later over 4000 acres of heath had been reclaimed.
  • North Norfolk District Council (Alby

    North Norfolk District Council (Alby

    DEFINITIVE STATEMENT OF PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY NORTH NORFOLK DISTRICT VOLUME I PARISH OF ALBY WITH THWAITE Footpath No. 1 (Middle Hill to Aldborough Mill). Starts from Middle Hill and runs north westwards to Aldborough Hill at parish boundary where it joins Footpath No. 12 of Aldborough. Footpath No. 2 (Alby Hill to All Saints' Church). Starts from Alby Hill and runs southwards to enter road opposite All Saints' Church. Footpath No. 3 (Dovehouse Lane to Footpath 13). Starts from Alby Hill and runs northwards, then turning eastwards, crosses Footpath No. 5 then again northwards, and continuing north-eastwards to field gate. Path continues from field gate in a south- easterly direction crossing the end Footpath No. 4 and U14440 continuing until it meets Footpath No.13 at TG 20567/34065. Footpath No. 4 (Park Farm to Sunday School). Starts from Park Farm and runs south westwards to Footpath No. 3 and U14440. Footpath No. 5 (Pack Lane). Starts from the C288 at TG 20237/33581 going in a northerly direction parallel and to the eastern boundary of the cemetery for a distance of approximately 11 metres to TG 20236/33589. Continuing in a westerly direction following the existing path for approximately 34 metres to TG 20201/33589 at the western boundary of the cemetery. Continuing in a generally northerly direction parallel to the western boundary of the cemetery for approximately 23 metres to the field boundary at TG 20206/33611. Continuing in a westerly direction parallel to and to the northern side of the field boundary for a distance of approximately 153 metres to exit onto the U440 road at TG 20054/33633.
  • Rural Villages

    Rural Villages

    Rural Villages Please note that general tidying of the wording which appeared in 2019 consultation version of the draft Local Plan review will be undertaken to reflect the current situation. This will be in relation to neighbourhood plans, local services which may have changed, housing numbers, and progress of any allocations which were made by the SADMP (2106) for example: Any changes as a result of the comments revived are highlighted in Bold Comments received by Historic England (HE) and the Environment Agency (EA) are considered in separate papers Comments relating to development boundary changes are also considered in a separate paper Denver, due to comments received by the landowner/agent of the SADMP (2016) allocate site, is also considered in a separate paper dedicated to the village. Appendix A shows all the Rural Villages section with the new highlighted yellow text 1 | P a g e Table of comments for the Rural Villages Section Section Consultee(s) Nature of Summary Consultee Suggested Officer Response / Respons Modification Proposed Action e Ashwicken Mr Dale Support Provides additional support for Allocate Site H002 Due to the relatively small Hambilton Site H002 number of new homes through the draft Local Plan review required to meet the Local Housing Need (LHN) new housing allocations were not proposed to be distributed below Key Rural Service Centres. It is possible now to meet the LHN through the Local Plan review without any further housing allocations. Therefore, we will not be considering this site further in the Local Plan review. It is recommended that the consultee reviews Policy LP26 with regard to possible windfall sites.
  • Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office

    Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office

    Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office This list summarises the Norfolk Record Office’s (NRO’s) holdings of parish (Church of England) registers and of transcripts and other copies of them. Parish Registers The NRO holds registers of baptisms, marriages, burials and banns of marriage for most parishes in the Diocese of Norwich (including Suffolk parishes in and near Lowestoft in the deanery of Lothingland) and part of the Diocese of Ely in south-west Norfolk (parishes in the deanery of Fincham and Feltwell). Some Norfolk parish records remain in the churches, especially more recent registers, which may be still in use. In the extreme west of the county, records for parishes in the deanery of Wisbech Lynn Marshland are deposited in the Wisbech and Fenland Museum, whilst Welney parish records are at the Cambridgeshire Record Office. The covering dates of registers in the following list do not conceal any gaps of more than ten years; for the populous urban parishes (such as Great Yarmouth) smaller gaps are indicated. Whenever microfiche or microfilm copies are available they must be used in place of the original registers, some of which are unfit for production. A few parish registers have been digitally photographed and the images are available on computers in the NRO's searchroom. The digital images were produced as a result of partnership projects with other groups and organizations, so we are not able to supply copies of whole registers (either as hard copies or on CD or in any other digital format), although in most cases we have permission to provide printout copies of individual entries.