Utah Medicaid Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committee Drug

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Utah Medicaid Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committee Drug Utah Medicaid Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committee Drug Class Review Antidepressants, Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors (MAOIs) 28:16:04.12 Isocarboxazid (Marplan®, generic) Phenelzine (Nardil®, generic) Selegiline (EmSam®) Tranylcypromine (Parnate®, generic) Anti-Parkinson Agents, Monoamine Oxidase B Inhibitors (MAO-B) 28:36.32 Rasagiline (Azilect®) Selegiline (Eldepryl®, Zelapar® and generic-for some products) Final Report September 2016 Review Prepared by: Vicki Frydrych, PharmD, BS, Clinical Pharmacist Joanne LaFleur, PharmD, MSPH, Associate Professor University of Utah College of Pharmacy Copyright © 2016 by University of Utah College of Pharmacy Salt Lake City, UT. All rights reserved. 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 3 Introduction: .................................................................................................................................... 5 Table 1: Comparison of Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitor Antidepressants .................................. 6 Disease Overview ........................................................................................................................... 9 Table 2. Current Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Depressive Disorders ...... 11 Table 3. Current Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease ........ 17 Pharmacology ............................................................................................................................... 22 Table 4: Pharmacokinetics of Tricyclic (and Tetracyclic) Antidepressants ............................. 25 Special Populations ....................................................................................................................... 27 Table 5: Special Populations ..................................................................................................... 28 Methods......................................................................................................................................... 30 Evidence ........................................................................................................................................ 30 Summary: ...................................................................................................................................... 38 Refernces....................................................................................................................................... 41 2 Executive Summary Introduction: This review includes the nonselective monoamine oxidase inhibitors isocarboxazid, phenelzine and tranylcypromine, labeled for use in the treatment of depression as well as the specific monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors (MAO-B) selegiline and rasagiline. Indicated for the treatment of depression, the non-specific monoamine oxidase inhibitors are available in tablet formulation as are the MAO-B medications. Selegiline is additionally available in transdermal formulation (EmSam®) for use in depression. Both MAO-B inhibitors (rasagiline and selegiline) are indicated for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Rasagiline is available as an oral tablet and selegiline is available as oral tablet, capsule and orally disintegrating tablet formulations. The transdermal formulation of selegiline is not labeled for use in Parkinson’s disease. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) have been available for use for over 60 years following the discovery that the antitubercular drug iproniazid had mood-elevating properties. MAOIs are categorized in a variety of ways. By chemical structure they are either hydrazine (phenelzine, isocarboxazid) or non-hydrazine (rasagiline, selegiline and tranylcypromine) compounds. By MAO enzyme selectivity, they demonstrate MAO-A, MAO-B or mixed selectivity. Categorized by enzyme binding affinity they demonstrate either reversible or functionally irreversible binding to monoamine enzymes. MAOIs are highly active antidepressants, however their use has been limited by a number of coincident occurrences. First, the FDA required efficacy studies on medications marketed before the 1960s, including the MAOIs. At this same time, morbidity and mortality reports were being published that found the MAOIs “unsafe”, although the connection with tyramine intake, which could be controlled, was not known. Finally, a study of the Medical Research Council in 1965 compared a (too) low dose of phenelzine (60 mg daily) over a too short duration (4 weeks) with a new tricyclic (imipramine) in inpatients with severe endogenous depression and found imipramine to have superior efficacy. Imipramine also appeared better tolerated, albeit the TCA side effect profile had not been fully defined. These events are most responsible for the current disuse of the MAOIs. By the 1970s, investigators identified MAO subtypes, MAO-A and MAO-B. MAO-B degrades dopamine and was found in high concentration in the basal ganglia of the brain. MAO- B inhibition resulted in increased dopamine concentrations in the brain and these agents began to find their utility in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease, a disease of brain dopamine deficiency. Clinical Efficacy: Evidence is insufficient to identify differences in efficacy between MAOIs. A review of the evidence finds that comparative evidence between MAOIs or MAO-Bs is scarce. In the treatment of depression, MAOI efficacy appears to persist for at least 6 months. Available evidence suggests that phenelzine may be superior to isocarboxazid in inpatient treatment of depression while no difference was found between phenelzine and tranylcypromine in treatment-resistant depression. Evidence suggests that compared to TCAs, MAOIs may be especially useful in the treatment of atypical depression. Although efficacious in the treatment of bulimia nervosa and social anxiety disorders comparative evidence is unavailable. Evidence does not support the use of MAOIs in smoking cessation. There are no comparative trials with selegiline transdermal therapy for depression. Rasagiline was found efficacious in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease fatigue although comparative evidence is unavailable. Evidence found no increase in mortality with use of MAO-B agents in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. 3 Comparative evidence is lacking for MAO-B therapies in Parkinson’s disease. MAO-B therapy was not more effective than other anti-Parkinson therapies, but may be better tolerated. Adverse Drug Reactions: MAOIs may increase the risk of suicidality in young people and may activate mania/hypomania in patients with undiagnosed bipolar disorder. Rapid discontinuation of MAOI therapy may precipitate a withdrawal reaction. Early adverse events include postural hypotension which may be minimized with slow dose uptitration, administration of fluids, divided or bedtime dosing. Late adverse effects include weight gain, paresthesias (which may be minimized with pyridoxine supplementation), hypoglycemia, tremor and blood dyscrasias. MAOIs (especially maprotiline) lower the seizure threshold and should be used cautiously in patients with a history or risk of seizures. Although rare, hepatotoxicity may occur (especially with phenelzine and isocarboxazid) and patients should be instructed to note and report signs and symptoms of hepatotoxicity. Transdermal selegiline may cause application site reactions, problems with impulse control, hallucinations and falling asleep while performing activities of daily living. Rasagiline appears well tolerated, although adverse event rates are higher in the elderly. Hypertension may occur in the absence of interacting medications or diet. More commonly, hypertensive crisis may occur when MAOIs are ingested with high-content tyramine foods (>6-10 mg/serving). Transdermal selegiline at 6 mg/24 hours is void of this interaction although risk increases with higher doses. MAOIs are highly toxic in overdosage, affecting cardiac conduction and requiring hospitalization and careful monitoring while the drug is eliminated from the body. MOAIs bind monoamine oxidase irreversible and exert effects until monoamine is regenerated, which may require up to 14 days. MAOIs impair oxidative degradation of vasoactive amines and stimulant type medications. Hepatic enzyme inhibition (CPY2C19) increases serum levels of substrates (e.g. omeprazole, citalopram, sertraline) and the effect persists after the MAOI is discontinued. Caution is required in adding medications in patients who receive an MAOI or have had one recently discontinued. Of particular concern is the risk for serotonin syndrome. Use of an MAOI and additional medication which increases serotonin levels, especially one that increases serotonin by a different mechanism, may result in serotonin syndrome which may be fatal. Medications carrying the greatest risk in combination with an MAOI are the SSRIs and linezolid. The syndrome may occur in a dose-dependent fashion with the weak serotonin inhibitors meperidine, tramadol, methadone, fentanyl and dextromethorphan. Serotonergic interaction with the tricyclic antidepressants is greatest with clomipramine. Summary: The MAOIs are not first–line therapy for the treatment of depression as safer alternatives are available, although they may afford a benefit for patients with resistant or atypical depression. Comparative evidence is lacking for the nonselective MAOIs as well as the MAO-B inhibitors. Due to irreversible MAO-binding, caution must be exercised when using these medications.
Recommended publications
  • INVESTIGATION of NATURAL PRODUCT SCAFFOLDS for the DEVELOPMENT of OPIOID RECEPTOR LIGANDS by Katherine M
    INVESTIGATION OF NATURAL PRODUCT SCAFFOLDS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF OPIOID RECEPTOR LIGANDS By Katherine M. Prevatt-Smith Submitted to the graduate degree program in Medicinal Chemistry and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _________________________________ Chairperson: Dr. Thomas E. Prisinzano _________________________________ Dr. Brian S. J. Blagg _________________________________ Dr. Michael F. Rafferty _________________________________ Dr. Paul R. Hanson _________________________________ Dr. Susan M. Lunte Date Defended: July 18, 2012 The Dissertation Committee for Katherine M. Prevatt-Smith certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: INVESTIGATION OF NATURAL PRODUCT SCAFFOLDS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF OPIOID RECEPTOR LIGANDS _________________________________ Chairperson: Dr. Thomas E. Prisinzano Date approved: July 18, 2012 ii ABSTRACT Kappa opioid (KOP) receptors have been suggested as an alternative target to the mu opioid (MOP) receptor for the treatment of pain because KOP activation is associated with fewer negative side-effects (respiratory depression, constipation, tolerance, and dependence). The KOP receptor has also been implicated in several abuse-related effects in the central nervous system (CNS). KOP ligands have been investigated as pharmacotherapies for drug abuse; KOP agonists have been shown to modulate dopamine concentrations in the CNS as well as attenuate the self-administration of cocaine in a variety of species, and KOP antagonists have potential in the treatment of relapse. One drawback of current opioid ligand investigation is that many compounds are based on the morphine scaffold and thus have similar properties, both positive and negative, to the parent molecule. Thus there is increasing need to discover new chemical scaffolds with opioid receptor activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Product Insert (PDF)
    PRODUCT INFORMATION Isocarboxazid Item No. 23625 CAS Registry No.: 59-63-2 Formal Name: 5-methyl-3-isoxazolecarboxylic acid, 2-(phenylmethyl)hydrazide Synonyms: NSC 169893, Ro 5-0831 H N N H MF: C12H13N3O2 FW: 231.3 N O Purity: ≥98% O Supplied as: A solid Storage: -20°C Stability: ≥2 years Information represents the product specifications. Batch specific analytical results are provided on each certificate of analysis. Laboratory Procedures Isocarboxazid is supplied as a solid. A stock solution may be made by dissolving the isocarboxazid in the solvent of choice. Isocarboxazid is slightly soluble in acetonitrile and chloroform. Description 1 Isocarboxazid is an inhibitor of monoamine oxidase (MAO; IC50 = 4.8 μM for rat brain MAO). It induces a 4-fold increase in tryptamine action in isolated rat fundal strips at a concentration of 50 nM. In vivo, isocarboxazid potentiates tryptamine toxicity (LD50 = 8 mg/kg following subcutaneous administration of 250 mg/kg tryptamine). It inhibits 90% of MAO activity in isolated rat hearts and reduces cardiomegaly induced by isoproterenol (Item No. 15592) in rats at a dose of 20 mg/kg.2 Oral administration of isocarboxazid (10 mg/kg) increases levels of dopamine and norepinephrine and reduces levels of the monoamine metabolites DOPAC, homovanillic acid (HVA; Item No. 20877), and 5-hydroxy indole-3-acetic acid (5-HIAA; Item No. 22889) by 43, 32, and 28%, respectively, in mouse brain.3 Formulations containing isocarboxazid have been used for the treatment of minor depression.4 References 1. Maxwell, D.R., Gray, W.R., and Taylor, E.M. Relative activity of some inhibitors of mono-amine oxidase in potentiating the action of tryptamine in vitro and in vivo.
    [Show full text]
  • Emulated Clinical Trials from Longitudinal Real-World Data Efficiently Identify Candidates for Neurological Disease Modification
    medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.11.20171447; this version posted November 20, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Emulated Clinical Trials from Longitudinal Real-World Data Efficiently Identify Candidates for Neurological Disease Modification: Examples from Parkinson's Disease Daphna Laifenfeld, PhD1,a,†, Chen Yanover, PhD2,b,†, Michal Ozery-Flato, PhD3,†, Oded Shaham, PhD2,c, Michal Rozen-Zvi, PhD3,4,*, Nirit Lev, MD/PhD1,d,‡ , Yaara Goldschmidt, PhD2,e,‡, Iris Grossman, PhD1,f,‡ 1Formerly Teva Pharmaceuticals Research & Development, Petach Tikva, Israel; 2Formerly IBM Research – Haifa, Israel; 3IBM Research – Haifa, Israel; 4Faculty of Medicine, The HeBrew University, Jerusalem, Israel; aPresent Address: Ibex Medical Analytics, Tel Aviv, Israel; bPresent Address: KI Research Institute, Kfar Malal, Israel; cPresent Address: MeMed Dx, Haifa, Israel; dPresent Address: Meir Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; ePresent Address: K Health, Tel Aviv, Israel; fPresent Address: Gross Advantage, Brookline, MA, USA; † These authors contriButed equally and share first authorship. ‡ These authors contriButed equally to this work. * Corresponding author: Michal Rosen-Zvi [email protected] Haifa University Campus, Mount Carmel Haifa, 3498825, Israel Tel: (972) 04-8296517 Keywords: Real World Data; Clinical Evidence; Parkinson’s disease; Artificial Intelligence; Causal Inference; Rasagiline; Zolpidem; Disease Modifying Therapeutics; Repurposing. NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on the Metabolism and Toxicity of Hydrazine in The~Rat~
    STUDIES ON THE METABOLISM AND TOXICITY OF HYDRAZINE IN THE~RAT~ Andrew Michael Jenner, B.Sc. Submitted to the University of London for the examination of the degree for Doctor of Philosophy, 1992 Toxicology Department The School of Pharmacy Brunswick Square London ProQuest Number: U068521 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest U068521 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere appreciation to my supervisor Dr. John Timbrell for his invaluable advice, guidance and support. Many people have assisted the progress of my studies in a wide variety of ways, including everyone who has worked alongside me in the Toxicology Unit, both past and present. Particular thanks go to Simon (ET) for his critical eye and mutual, down to earth Yorkshire mentality and also to Cathy for her heartening encouragement. I would also like to thank Dr. Alan Boobis for his assistance in obtaining human liver samples and to the USAF for funding this project. Finally I would like to recognise Jacqui for her designs, Maria for her typing, Justina for her continuous care and support and to my mum and dad for their understanding and my much appreciated conveyance through life.
    [Show full text]
  • Ayahuasca: Spiritual Pharmacology & Drug Interactions
    Ayahuasca: Spiritual Pharmacology & Drug Interactions BENJAMIN MALCOLM, PHARMD, MPH [email protected] MARCH 28 TH 2017 AWARE PROJECT Can Science be Spiritual? “Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality. When we recognize our place in an immensity of light years and in the passage of ages, when we grasp the intricacy, beauty and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling, that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual. The notion that science and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both.” – Carl Sagan Disclosures & Disclaimers No conflicts of interest to disclose – I don’t get paid by pharma and have no potential to profit directly from ayahuasca This presentation is for information purposes only, none of the information presented should be used in replacement of medical advice or be considered medical advice This presentation is not an endorsement of illicit activity Presentation Outline & Objectives Describe what is known regarding ayahuasca’s pharmacology Outline adverse food and drug combinations with ayahuasca as well as strategies for risk management Provide an overview of spiritual pharmacology and current clinical data supporting potential of ayahuasca for treatment of mental illness Pharmacology Terms Drug ◦ Term used synonymously with substance or medicine in this presentation and in pharmacology ◦ No offense intended if I call your medicine or madre a drug! Bioavailability ◦ The amount of a drug that enters the body and is able to have an active effect ◦ Route specific: bioavailability is different between oral, intranasal, inhalation (smoked), and injected routes of administration (IV, IM, SC) Half-life (T ½) ◦ The amount of time it takes the body to metabolize/eliminate 50% of a drug ◦ E.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Brimonidine Tartrate; Brinzolamide
    Contains Nonbinding Recommendations Draft Guidance on Brimonidine Tartrate ; Brinzolamide This draft guidance, when finalized, will represent the current thinking of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA, or the Agency) on this topic. It does not establish any rights for any person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. To discuss an alternative approach, contact the Office of Generic Drugs. Active Ingredient: Brimonidine tartrate; Brinzolamide Dosage Form; Route: Suspension/drops; ophthalmic Strength: 0.2%; 1% Recommended Studies: One study Type of study: Bioequivalence (BE) study with clinical endpoint Design: Randomized (1:1), double-masked, parallel, two-arm, in vivo Strength: 0.2%; 1% Subjects: Males and females with chronic open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension in both eyes. Additional comments: Specific recommendations are provided below. ______________________________________________________________________________ Analytes to measure (in appropriate biological fluid): Not applicable Bioequivalence based on (95% CI): Clinical endpoint Additional comments regarding the BE study with clinical endpoint: 1. The Office of Generic Drugs (OGD) recommends conducting a BE study with a clinical endpoint in the treatment of open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension comparing the test product to the reference listed drug (RLD), each applied as one drop in both eyes three times daily at approximately 8:00 a.m., 4:00 p.m., and 10:00 p.m. for 42 days (6 weeks). 2. Inclusion criteria (the sponsor may add additional criteria): a. Male or nonpregnant females aged at least 18 years with chronic open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension in both eyes b.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 1. Glaucoma Medications: Mechanisms, Dosing and Precautions Brand Generic Mechanism of Action Dosage/Avg
    OPTOMETRIC STUDY CENTER Table 1. Glaucoma Medications: Mechanisms, Dosing and Precautions Brand Generic Mechanism of Action Dosage/Avg. % Product Sizes Side Effects Warnings Reduction CHOLINERGIC AGENTS Direct Pilocarpine (generic) Pilocarpine 1%, 2%, 4% Increases trabecular outflow BID-QID/15-25% 15ml Headache, blurred vision, myopia, retinal detachment, bronchiole constriction, Angle closure, shortness of breath, retinal narrowing of angle detachment Indirect Phospholine Iodide (Pfizer) Echothiophate iodide 0.125% Increases trabecular outflow QD-BID/15-25% 5ml Same as above plus cataractogenic iris cysts in children, pupillary block, Same as above, plus avoid prior to any increased paralysis with succinylcholine general anesthetic procedure ALPHA-2 AGONISTS Alphagan P (Allergan) Brimonidine tartrate 0.1%, 0.15% with Purite Decreases aqueous production, increases BID-TID/up to 26% 5ml, 10ml, 15ml Dry mouth, hypotension, bradycardia, follicular conjunctivitis, ocular irritation, Monitor for shortness of breath, dizziness, preservative uveoscleral outflow pruritus, dermatitis, conjunctival blanching, eyelid retraction, mydriasis, drug ocular redness and itching, fatigue allergy Brimonidine tartrate Brimonidine tartrate 0.15%, 0.2% Same as above Same as above 5ml, 10ml Same as above Same as above (generic) Iopidine (Novartis) Apraclonidine 0.5% Decreases aqueous production BID-TID/up to 25% 5ml, 10ml Same as above but higher drug allergy (40%) Same as above BETA-BLOCKERS Non-selective Betagan (Allergan) Levobunolol 0.25%, 0.5% Decreases
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Phenelzine and Other Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitor
    British Journal of Phammcology (1995) 114. 837-845 B 1995 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0007-1188/95 $9.00 The effects of phenelzine and other monoamine oxidase inhibitor antidepressants on brain and liver 12 imidazoline-preferring receptors Regina Alemany, Gabriel Olmos & 'Jesu's A. Garcia-Sevilla Laboratory of Neuropharmacology, Department of Fundamental Biology and Health Sciences, University of the Balearic Islands, E-07071 Palma de Mallorca, Spain 1 The binding of [3H]-idazoxan in the presence of 106 M (-)-adrenaline was used to quantitate 12 imidazoline-preferring receptors in the rat brain and liver after chronic treatment with various irre- versible and reversible monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors. 2 Chronic treatment (7-14 days) with the irreversible MAO inhibitors, phenelzine (1-20 mg kg-', i.p.), isocarboxazid (10 mg kg-', i.p.), clorgyline (3 mg kg-', i.p.) and tranylcypromine (10mg kg-', i.p.) markedly decreased (21-71%) the density of 12 imidazoline-preferring receptors in the rat brain and liver. In contrast, chronic treatment (7 days) with the reversible MAO-A inhibitors, moclobemide (1 and 10 mg kg-', i.p.) or chlordimeform (10 mg kg-', i.p.) or with the reversible MAO-B inhibitor Ro 16-6491 (1 and 10 mg kg-', i.p.) did not alter the density of 12 imidazoline-preferring receptors in the rat brain and liver; except for the higher dose of Ro 16-6491 which only decreased the density of these putative receptors in the liver (38%). 3 In vitro, phenelzine, clorgyline, 3-phenylpropargylamine, tranylcypromine and chlordimeform dis- placed the binding of [3H]-idazoxan to brain and liver I2 imidazoline-preferring receptors from two distinct binding sites.
    [Show full text]
  • From NMDA Receptor Hypofunction to the Dopamine Hypothesis of Schizophrenia J
    REVIEW The Neuropsychopharmacology of Phencyclidine: From NMDA Receptor Hypofunction to the Dopamine Hypothesis of Schizophrenia J. David Jentsch, Ph.D., and Robert H. Roth, Ph.D. Administration of noncompetitive NMDA/glutamate effects of these drugs are discussed, especially with regard to receptor antagonists, such as phencyclidine (PCP) and differing profiles following single-dose and long-term ketamine, to humans induces a broad range of exposure. The neurochemical effects of NMDA receptor schizophrenic-like symptomatology, findings that have antagonist administration are argued to support a contributed to a hypoglutamatergic hypothesis of neurobiological hypothesis of schizophrenia, which includes schizophrenia. Moreover, a history of experimental pathophysiology within several neurotransmitter systems, investigations of the effects of these drugs in animals manifested in behavioral pathology. Future directions for suggests that NMDA receptor antagonists may model some the application of NMDA receptor antagonist models of behavioral symptoms of schizophrenia in nonhuman schizophrenia to preclinical and pathophysiological research subjects. In this review, the usefulness of PCP are offered. [Neuropsychopharmacology 20:201–225, administration as a potential animal model of schizophrenia 1999] © 1999 American College of is considered. To support the contention that NMDA Neuropsychopharmacology. Published by Elsevier receptor antagonist administration represents a viable Science Inc. model of schizophrenia, the behavioral and neurobiological KEY WORDS: Ketamine; Phencyclidine; Psychotomimetic; widely from the administration of purportedly psychot- Memory; Catecholamine; Schizophrenia; Prefrontal cortex; omimetic drugs (Snyder 1988; Javitt and Zukin 1991; Cognition; Dopamine; Glutamate Jentsch et al. 1998a), to perinatal insults (Lipska et al. Biological psychiatric research has seen the develop- 1993; El-Khodor and Boksa 1997; Moore and Grace ment of many putative animal models of schizophrenia.
    [Show full text]
  • Prozac and Prozac Weekly (Fluoxetine Hcl)
    CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH Approval Package for: APPLICATION NUMBER: NDA 18-936/S-093 NDA 21-235/S-016 Trade Name: Prozac and Prozac Weekly Generic Name: fluoxetine HCl Sponsor: Lilly Approval Date: April 4, 2011 ,QGLFDWLRQ Revisions to the following section 8.1 of the label. CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: NDA 18-936/S-093 NDA 21-235/S-016 CONTENTS Reviews / Information Included in this NDA Review. Approval Letter X Other Action Letters X Labeling Summary Review X Officer/Employee List Office Director Memo Cross Discipline Team Leader Review Medical Review(s) X Chemistry Review(s) Pharmacology Review(s) Statistical Review(s) Clinical Pharmacology/Biopharmaceutics Review(s) Other Reviews X Proprietary Name Review(s) Administrative/Correspondence Document(s) X CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: NDA 18-936/S-093 NDA 21-235/S-016 APPROVAL LETTER DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring MD 20993 NDA 018936/S-091/S-093/S-095 NDA 021235/S-015/S-016/S-017 SUPPLEMENT APPROVAL Eli Lilly & Company Attention: Kevin C. Sheehan, MS, Pharm.D. Manager, Global Regulatory Affairs - US Lilly Corporate Center Indianapolis, IN 46285 Dear Dr. Sheehan: Please refer to your Supplemental New Drug Applications (sNDA) dated and received May 21, 2009 (018936/S-091 and 021235/S-015), November 6, 2009 (018936/S-093 and 021235/S-016), and April 14, 2010 (018936/S-095 and 021235/S-017), submitted under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) for Prozac (fluoxetine hydrochloride) 10 mg, 20 mg, and 40 mg capsules and Prozac Weekly (fluoxetine hydrochloride) 90 mg delayed-release capsules.
    [Show full text]
  • Inhibits Dyskinesia Expression and Normalizes Motor Activity in 1-Methyl-4-Phenyl-1,2,3,6-Tetrahydropyridine-Treated Primates
    The Journal of Neuroscience, October 8, 2003 • 23(27):9107–9115 • 9107 Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (Ecstasy) Inhibits Dyskinesia Expression and Normalizes Motor Activity in 1-Methyl-4-Phenyl-1,2,3,6-Tetrahydropyridine-Treated Primates Mahmoud M. Iravani, Michael J. Jackson, Mikko Kuoppama¨ki, Lance A. Smith, and Peter Jenner Neurodegenerative Disease Research Centre, Guy’s, King’s, and St. Thomas’ School of Biomedical Sciences, King’s College, London SE1 1UL, United Kingdom Ecstasy [3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)] was shown to prolong the action of L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) while suppressing dyskinesia in a single patient with Parkinson’s disease (PD). The clinical basis of this effect of MDMA is unknown but may relate to its actions on either dopaminergic or serotoninergic systems in brain. In normal, drug-naive common marmosets, MDMA administration suppressed motor activity and exploratory behavior. In 1-methyl- 4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine(MPTP)-treated, L-DOPA-primedcommonmarmosets,MDMAtransientlyrelievedmotordisability but over a period of 60 min worsened motor symptoms. When given in conjunction with L-DOPA, however, MDMA markedly decreased dyskinesia by reducing chorea and to a lesser extent dystonia and decreased locomotor activity to the level observed in normal animals. MDMA similarly alleviated dyskinesia induced by the selective dopamine D2/3 agonist pramipexole. The actions of MDMA appeared to be mediated through 5-HT mechanisms because its effects were fully blocked by the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluvoxamine. Furthermore,theeffectofMDMAon L-DOPA-inducedmotoractivityanddyskinesiawaspartiallyinhibitedby5-HT1a/bantagonists.The ability of MDMA to inhibit dyskinesia results from its broad spectrum of action on 5-HT systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Pharmacology of Ayahuasca: Subjective and Cardiovascular Effects, Monoamine Metabolite Excretion and Pharmacokinetics
    TESI DOCTORAL HUMAN PHARMACOLOGY OF AYAHUASCA JORDI RIBA Barcelona, 2003 Director de la Tesi: DR. MANEL JOSEP BARBANOJ RODRÍGUEZ A la Núria, el Marc i l’Emma. No pasaremos en silencio una de las cosas que á nuestro modo de ver llamará la atención... toman un bejuco llamado Ayahuasca (bejuco de muerto ó almas) del cual hacen un lijero cocimiento...esta bebida es narcótica, como debe suponerse, i á pocos momentos empieza a producir los mas raros fenómenos...Yo, por mí, sé decir que cuando he tomado el Ayahuasca he sentido rodeos de cabeza, luego un viaje aéreo en el que recuerdo percibia las prespectivas mas deliciosas, grandes ciudades, elevadas torres, hermosos parques i otros objetos bellísimos; luego me figuraba abandonado en un bosque i acometido de algunas fieras, de las que me defendia; en seguida tenia sensación fuerte de sueño del cual recordaba con dolor i pesadez de cabeza, i algunas veces mal estar general. Manuel Villavicencio Geografía de la República del Ecuador (1858) Das, was den Indianer den “Aya-huasca-Trank” lieben macht, sind, abgesehen von den Traumgesichten, die auf sein persönliches Glück Bezug habenden Bilder, die sein inneres Auge während des narkotischen Zustandes schaut. Louis Lewin Phantastica (1927) Agraïments La present tesi doctoral constitueix la fase final d’una idea nascuda ara fa gairebé nou anys. El fet que aquest treball sobre la farmacologia humana de l’ayahuasca hagi estat una realitat es deu fonamentalment al suport constant del seu director, el Manel Barbanoj. Voldria expressar-li la meva gratitud pel seu recolzament entusiàstic d’aquest projecte, molt allunyat, per la natura del fàrmac objecte d’estudi, dels que fins al moment s’havien dut a terme a l’Àrea d’Investigació Farmacològica de l’Hospital de Sant Pau.
    [Show full text]