Executive Summary______

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Executive Summary______ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY______________________ The Connecticut Department of Transportation discussions that took place, the members of the PAC and (ConnDOT), the Capitol Region Council of Governments TAC expressed their support of a recommended package (CRCOG) and the Central Connecticut Regional Planning of improvements. Subsequently, the Transportation and Agency (CCRPA) have identified peak hour traffic conges- Policy Committees and Boards of the CRCOG and tion and safety deficiencies as major concerns for the CCRPA supported the further study and refinement of Hartford West corridor between Downtown Hartford the strategies contained in the recommended package. and the Fienemann Road interchange in Farmington. To The recommended package is illustrated in Figure ES-2. address these concerns and to evaluate the effectiveness of different transportation system improvement alterna- RECOMMENDED PACKAGE OF tives, these agencies undertook a Major Investment Study TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS The principle transportation improvement recommen- (MIS) for the Hartford West corridor. dation to result from this study process is the New The Hartford West Corridor. The Hartford West Britain-Hartford Busway. This facility will support the study corridor has been broadly defined to include not concept of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and is the first of its only I-84 itself, but also the neighborhoods surrounding kind in the state. Other enhancements to the Busway will the highway right-of-way, the parallel arterial roadways, be studied such as the feasibility of including a Multi-Use and two rail lines, the Bristol-Hartford line and the New Trail for the corridor and the role for Transportation Haven-Hartford line.The study area,shown in Figure ES- Demand Management components of an integrated trans- 1,encompasses portions of five communities:Hartford, portation package. An Environmental Impact Statement West Hartford, Farmington, Newington and New Britain. (EIS) will be prepared for this busway to specifically assess the impacts associated with it. Work on developing the Technical and Final Reports. Three technical EIS has begun. reports have previously been prepared in conjunction Other recommended improvements are: with this MIS. The first report established local goals and objectives, identified existing and future transportation • Reconstruction of Prospect, Flatbush, conditions and developed the purpose and need for Sisson, and Sigourney Interchanges on I- improvements. The second report identified alternatives 84. This area will require further study to determine that were intended to meet the purpose and need. Six the appropriate interchange configuration. It is antici- Reasonable Alternative Packages (RAPs) were formulated pated that an Environmental Assessment (EA) will be for evaluation. Packages included highway, transit, prepared for the interchange proposals developed as Transportation System Management, and Transportation part of the West Side Access Study; Demand Management strategies. In report three, the six • Reconstruction of Routes 4, 6 and 9 RAPs were assessed to determine how well they func- Interchanges on I-84. The suggested layout of tioned, and a Hybrid package of improvements was pro- this interchange is supported by towns and CRCOG, posed. The Final Report presents an overview of the rec- and will be advanced into the design phase. Because ommended improvements and their performance. improvements will be made within existing right-of-way and impacts are limited, it is anticipated that a Policy and Technical Advisory Committees. Categorical Exclusion (CE) will be granted for this To provide support for the MIS, a Policy Advisory improvement; Committee (PAC) and a Technical Advisory Committee • Auxiliary Lanes in West Hartford. These (TAC) were formed with membership drawn from corri- safety improvements between Exits 40 and 42 on I-84 dor municipalities, regional, state, federal, and other agen- are supported by the town and CRCOG, and will be cies and organizations. Based on the technical analysis and advanced into the design phase. Because improvements Executive Summary Wilbur Smith Associates Hartford West MIS Page ES-1 will be made within existing right-of-way and impacts Britain, the busway would operate on the abandoned are limited, it is anticipated that a Categorical Exclusion New Britain Secondary right-of-way owned by the State (CE) will be granted for this improvement. Special sen- of Connecticut. Beyond this point, express bus routes sitivity will be given to noise impacts on adjoining neigh- would operate to Plainville and other suburban loca- borhoods; tions via the existing Route 72 freeway. • Improved Bus Services along I-84/ Intermediate stations will be coordinated with develop- Farmington Avenue. Suggestions for improved ment centers such as the Aetna Insurance corporate transit routes and schedules have been referred to the headquarters (employment center with over 10,000 bus studies presently underway by ConnDOT and employees), the New Park Road development area in CRCOG. The need for service enhancements has been Hartford’s Parkville and Charter Oak neighborhoods, supported by towns and CRCOG; Central Connecticut State University (CCSU) with over • Support for Arterial Highways. The inter- 12,000 full-time and part-time students, and 1,200 full- sections and park and ride lots targeted for improve- time and part-time employees, and the East Main Street ment will be included as part of an overall strategy development area of the City of New Britain. undertaken by CRCOG and CCRPA to address safety, Stations would be sited at twelve locations, including: operational, and transportation impacts on quality of • Hartford: Union Station, State Armory, Aetna life; Insurance, Park Street, New Park Avenue • Transportation Demand Management • West Hartford: Oakwood/Flatbush Avenue, (TDM). As an adjunct to the New Britain-Hartford Busway, a TDM will be studied for the purpose of Elmwood (New Britain Avenue) increasing transit ridership. TDM strategies work most • Newington: Willard Avenue, Cedar Street effectively as complements to transit service enhance- • New Britain: East Street, South Main Street, ments. The most successful strategy in increasing tran- Downtown sit ridership was “Financial Incentives;” just as “free” or GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR “subsidized” parking reduces the cost of automobile CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS use, Financial Incentives reduce the “cost” to the transit Transportation Goals and Objectives were the corner- rider thus enhancing use; stone for evaluating alternative transportation improve- • Land Use Regulation to Support Transit ments. To evaluate the potential for success of the strate- Friendly Design. Even though land use and its reg- gies, the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) members ulation is not directly under the control of ConnDOT, defined a set of Goals and Objectives. The following five future land use is nonetheless a critical ingredient to the goals were supported by a comprehensive set of specific success of the BRT strategy. With the endorsement of objectives and related performance measures: towns, CCRPA, and CRCOG, appropriate land use reg- • Modal Choices - The first goal of improvements to ulations will be developed as an element of continuing be implemented was to increase the modal choices avail- busway implementation. able for the movement of people and goods. • New Britain - Hartford Busway Service • Congestion Reduction - The second goal was to Area. The New Britain - Hartford Busway will offer an reduce peak hour vehicular congestion. excellent opportunity to serve travel demand between • Public Health and Safety - The third goal was to the two cities with a faster and more efficient alterna- improve public health and safety associated with trans- tive to conventional on-street bus operation. As shown portation. in Figure ES-2, the proposed exclusive use busway would • Economic Development - The fourth goal was to initially operate along nine (9) miles of inactive and increase opportunities for local and region-wide eco- active railroad right-of-way between Union Station at nomic development by improving mobility. the western edge of Hartford’s Central Business • Community Livability & Quality of Life - District (CBD) and Downtown New Britain. From the The fifth goal was to enhance the livability and quality of Hartford CBD to Newington Junction (Willard Avenue), life for corridor towns, neighborhoods and communities. the busway would share the right-of-way with existing Amtrak rail service. From Newington Junction to New Alternative Modes. The busway offers a unique Executive Summary Wilbur Smith Associates Hartford West MIS Page ES-2 opportunity to handle the travel demand among the cor- Hartford. The Hartford portion of the MIS study area ridor towns. New Britain, Newington, and Hartford expe- incorporates a broad mix of land uses. A key transporta- rience a strong interchange of trips that requires a flexible tion concern for the Hartford West study area is that public transit service. By implementing park and ride lots, future improvement plans be made to support other developing feeder bus routes, and facilitating pedestrian urban re-development initiatives, such as the city’s planned connections, this busway will serve as a spine to more redevelopment of the Parkville and Flatbush Avenue indus- effectively connect and coordinate transit and other trial areas, the Charter Oak Terrace housing complex, and intermodal transportation services. the proposed
Recommended publications
  • 2.3 Minority Population (Sheets 1-12)  New Haven - Hartford 1A 1B Springfield Hamden Commuter Rail Project # 170-2296
    2.3 Minority Population (Sheets 1-12) New Haven - Hartford 1A 1B Springfield Hamden Commuter Rail Project # 170-2296 3A 2B Hamden North Haven 2A Hamden North Haven 1B New Haven 1A New Haven Minority Population Rail !( Amtrak Station New Haven State Street Station !( Proposed Station Location !( Study Area Municipal Boundary State Boundary New Haven Minority Population Percent Per Block Group Up to 46% 46% - 69% Union Station New Haven !( Greater than 69% East Haven Fe et 0 510 1,020 1,530 2,040 2,550 FITZGERALDDRAFT & GRAPHIC HALLIDAY, INC. PlanningSEPTEMBER Consultants 1, 2011 72 Cedar Street, Hartford,CT 06106 (860) 247-7200 www.fhipl an.com [ Data Source: 2009 American Data Source: 2009 American Community Survey Community Survey SeptemberJuly 2011 2011 – Fitzgerald- Fitzgerald & Halliday, & Halliday, Inc. - Original Inc. in– ColorProject # 709.01 – Original in Color New Haven - Hartford 2A 2B Springfield Commuter Rail Project # 170-2296 4A Cheshire 3B Wallingford 3A 2B Hamden !(North Haven Station North Haven 2A North Haven 1B East Haven 1A New Haven North Haven Branford Minority Population Rail !( Amtrak Station !( Proposed Station Location Study Area Municipal Boundary State Boundary Minority Population Percent Per Block Group Up to 46% 46% - 69% Greater than 69% Hamden Fe et 0 510 1,020 1,530 2,040 2,550 FITZGERALDDRAFT & GRAPHIC HALLIDAY, INC. PlanningSEPTEMBER Consultants 1, 2011 72 Cedar Street, Hartford,CT 06106 (860) 247-7200 www.fhipl an.com [ Data Source: 2009 American Data Source: 2009 American Community Survey Community
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B.7 Stations Location and Access Analysis TM
    Stations Location and Access Analysis Technical Memorandum October 1, 2015 Final Version Submitted by: Stations Location and Access Analysis Technical Memorandum Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 3 2. METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 STATION TYPOLOGY .......................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 STATION IDENTIFICATION ................................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 STATION ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................................... 7 2.3.1 Representative Stations and Station‐Pairs ............................................................................................. 9 3. STATION IDENTIFICATION ......................................................................................................................... 11 3.1 EXISTING STATIONS ......................................................................................................................................... 11 3.1.1 Reclassification ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation & Circulation
    Chapter 8 One City, One Plan Transportation & Circulation KEY TOPICS Travel Patterns Roadways Bus Transit Railway Airports Pedestrian & Bicycle Environment Comprehensive Transportation Planning Efforts Goals & Objectives Adopted June 3, 2010 One City, One Plan– POCD 2020 8- 2 Introduction Department of Transportation (ConnDOT), Transportation & Circulation Connecticut Department of Environmental Transportation plays a critical role in One City, Protection, Natural Resources Conservation One Plan. Transportation themes thread through Service, Capitol Region Council of Governments, the goals of the plan to promote livable and sus- CT Transit and others. The challenge for the next tainable neighborhoods, enhance mobility ten years is to incorporate these planning efforts through transit, pedestrian and bike systems city- and ideas into one comprehensive strategy for wide and by advancing downtown’s role as the the city. One such component included in this regions center for commerce, culture and city plan is called The Hartford Transportations Path- living. Further, the proposed railway and pedes- way Strategy which incorporates the plans in trian plans promote and encourage the integra- and around Union Station into one strategy. tion of sustainable practice in and around the city. Studies and initiatives examined as background in the preparation of this section include: A safe, efficient, flexible and economically viable Capitol Ave with Capitol Building in Background transportation system is essential to ensure that Hartford Traffic Control System Upgrades the City of Hartford can continue to grow and Hartford 2010 prosper. This system, comprised of a surface Hartford I-84 Viaduct Study (HUB of transportation network of highways, streets, Hartford) walkways, greenways, bikeways, and mass tran- ConnDOT 2007 Master Plan sit, and proximity to Bradley International Air- New Britain– Hartford Busway Project port is the basis for its expanding role.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER Fall 2018
    NEW HAVEN - HARTFORD - SPRINGFIELD RAIL PROGRAM NEWSLETTER Fall 2018 FROM THE COMMISSIONER Since the launch of the CTrail Hartford Hartford Line Momentum Continues..............................p.1-2 Line passenger rail CTrail Hartford Line Bicycle Update.......................................... p.2 service this past June, Another Phase of Track Construction Completed.............p.2 ridership has met Ribbon Cutting Ceremony Held at Berlin Station...............p.3 first year projections Hartford Line Releases New Schedule.................................p.3 with approximately Restrooms Reopened on CTrail Hartford Line Trains......p.3 69,000 trips through Operation Lifesaver Update: Rail Safety Week..................p.4 the first six weeks of Photo Gallery............................................................................p.4 service. As proud as we are of the new service, we cannot help but continue to look towards the future and the benefits of the NHHS Rail Program’s next phase. To advance the 2030 Regional Vision, Hartford Line Momentum Continues the new Program phase underway The CTrail Hartford Line continues to includes the design of additional new build momentum since its launch in stations in North Haven, West Hartford, June. Through October 31st, ridership Enfield, Windsor, and Windsor Locks, along the New Haven-Hartford- Springfield rail corridor has totaled over as well as the design of a second track 222,000 passenger trips! This includes between Windsor and Springfield. an average of nearly 49,000 trips per CTDOT continues to seek funding month in July, August and September for construction of these elements. and over 56,000 trips in October. These Once funded, these rail corridor trips are in addition to the nearly 22,000 improvements will allow us to increase trips that were made during the free opening weekend promotion on June Hartford Line service and frequency.
    [Show full text]
  • 30 BRADLEY FLYER Bus Schedule Effective September 11, 2016 30X Bradley Int’L Airport Via I-91
    30 BRADLEY FLYER Bus Schedule Effective September 11, 2016 30X Bradley Int’l Airport via I-91 30N Bradley Int’l Airport via North Main Street BRADLEY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT E l l a G r a L R s ’ s U BRADLEY INTERNATIONAL o T N T N TERMINAL A AIRPORT p I W k 10 e A INTERNATIONAL Y L TERMINAL A i AerLingus ARRIVALS BUILDING 8 g h 9 t SHERATON S American Airlines ch oe 140 ph 20 n oes USPS Delta o te t r il m Jet Blue a Loten H TELETHEATER A UTC AEROSPACE 9 One Jet SYSTEMS LA QUINTA Ra FAIRFIELD INN Southwest inbow DOUBLETREE HOMEWOOD SUITES High QUALITY O United Airlines ld R 34 INN C S a o C in FEDEX u H b HAMPTON n o t O w 75 INN y E PH HONDA O ES 20 T ER P A o irp q or u t o n o 20 c k Riv K Exit 40 er e n n r h e Arche Pat d igh y H STOP & 7 The Poquonock Park & Ride lot is served by the local SHOP 30, 32, 34, 36 & 54 routes, and the 905 & 915 Express. TARGET Exit 39 For complete listings of the trips to this Park & Ride lot for each route, please reference the individual route schedules. VOYA FINANCIAL Poquonock Nor Park & Ride th ! e 6 l KONICA d MARRIOTT MINOLTA MARRIOTT 32 Exit 38 COURTYARD 34 36 54 905 PRICE on HILTON is 915 CHOPPER d GARDEN d A INN P n H o Pigeo ill q u o n o ADDISON c CORPORATE TRAVELERS k Bl 75 oom PARK M !e o ld u n t a i 305 n WHAT THE SYMBOLS ON THE MAP MEAN 305 Timepoints are places the bus is scheduled to reach at a Elm 1 n o specific time (listed on the schedule).
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Amtrak Union Station
    Directions To Amtrak Union Station Moore remains valuable after Waine excoriates falsely or unravelling any piercers. Somnambulism Buddy dehydrogenate appropriately, he fluoridize his accoucheuse very summer. Sometimes ungodlier Flipper underworks her throttlers holus-bolus, but transitory Bogart extemporise westwards or footnotes coherently. How a Score a Great ski on fast Train Amtrak Blog. Baltimore-Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport BWI 324 miles Shuttle service or taxi Amtrak External page to mid Station Maryland. Learn up the Amtrak Los Angeles Union Station California CA station address map. Supreme court decision declaring segregation on board of this browser for directions. Train Boarding Process Amtrak. Riding an Amtrak Train Overnight Tips for possible-time Rail Travelers. Dallas area form of ways to make your right across army navy drive there are served by a direct rail station is limiting bookings are allowed. National park service? Twin Cities-Milwaukee-Chicago intercity passenger ferry service. Amtrak Campus Information. Blue line Route info alerts & schedules CTA. It's a easy connection to Chicago's Union Station where both O'Hare and Midway airports. How ruthless you board Amtrak at rock Station? Union Station Raleigh's Multimodal Transit Center. New models of interest in, which revolve many international is for directions. Amtrak Union being The Official Guide to Portland. Get directions reviews and information for Amtrak Union outlet in Portland OR. The Amtrak station is about State embassy in Schenectady a 10-minute walk or short taxi ride access the campus The Admissions Office did the third work on face right. Naperville fetures 2 Metra stations and also offers Amtrak service view of art Downtown.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter3 Existing Rail Corridor Inventory
    DRAFT Existing Conditions Report New Haven Hartford Springfield Commuter Rail Implementation Study Chapter 3 Existing Rail Corridor Inventory This chapter summarizes the existing operations along the rail corridor. A discussion of the rail passenger service and freight in the corridor is followed by a discussion of the existing stations and associated parking and access. Finally the physical features of the line are presented, including track, the communication and signal system, grade crossings and bridges. Figures 3.1-1 and 3.1-2 show the study corridor between New Haven and Springfield, with Figure 3.1-3 showing the spur rail line to Bradley Airport. 3.1 Existing Passenger Services on the Line The only existing rail passenger service on the New Haven to Springfield line is operated by the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak). Amtrak operates eleven trains a day between New Haven and Springfield, serving eight stations on the line. The stations and associated mileposts that Amtrak serves are listed in Table 3.1-1. Amtrak passes through but does not serve several towns in Connecticut including Hamden, North Haven, New Britain, Newington, West Hartford, and Enfield, as well as Longmeadow, Massachusetts. Table 3.1-1 New Haven – Springfield Line Current Stations Daily Amtrak Trains Station Milepost New Haven 0 11* Wallingford 12.6 8 Meriden 18.6 9 Berlin 25.9 9 Hartford 36.6 11 Windsor 43.1 9 Windsor Locks 47.3 9 Springfield 61.9 11* *Note-- Numbers of daily trains shown in New Haven and Springfield only relate to New Haven – Hartford – Springfield Amtrak Service and not other lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Station Area Plan
    New Britain - Hartford Busway Station Area Planning Project Union Station Area Plan July 2004 Capitol Region Council of Governments Union Station Sigourney St Legislative Office Building Parkville New Park Ave West Hartford Hartford Flatbush Elmwood Newington Jct. Cedar St Newington New Britain East St East Main St Downtown New Britain For more information: contact CRCOG at 860-522-2217 or go to CRCOG’s or Hartford’s websites: www.crcog.org; www.hartford.gov Prepared in cooperation with citizens, the Cities of New Britain and Hartford, the Towns of West Hartford and Newington, the Capitol Region Council of Governments, and the Connecticut Department of Transportation. The opinions, findings and conclusion expressed in this publication are those of the respective Municipal Advisory Committees that served on the project and do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Connecticut Department of Transportation and/or the U.S. Department of Transportation. Suggested CitationCitation: Capitol Region Council of Governments (CRCOG), 2004. New Britain - Hartford Station Area Planning Project: Sigourney Station Area Plan. CRCOG, 241 Main Street, Hartford, CT 06106. www.crcog.org. Acknowledgements Prepared for the Capitol Region Council of Governments by Crosby | Schlessinger | Smallridge in association with Basile Baumann Prost & Associates, Inc. Fitzgerald & Halliday, Inc. Susan Jones Moses This report was prepared with the help of the Hartford Municipal Advisory Committee. Hartford Municipal Advisory Committee Robert Painter, Committee Chairperson - City Council, City of Hartford Gerry Maine - Planning Department, City of Hartford Susan McMullen - City of Hartford, Director of Constituent Services Stephen Jewett - Commission on the City Plan, City of Hartford Kevin Burnham - Public Works Department, City of Hartford Glenn Geathers - Hartford Economic Development Commission John Shemo - MetroHartford Regional Economic Alliance, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Become a ROAD SCHOLAR
    BECOME A ROAD SCHOLAR Take Our Simple ROAD TEST: How can I travel around Connecticut? A) Take a bus or shuttle B) Take a train C) Carpool D) Bike/Walk E) ALL OF THE ABOVE If you answered “All of the Above”, you’re on your way to becoming a scholarly, green commuter! Your Off-Campus Commuting Options Use Your U-PASS – Ride for FREE! UCONN students can ride most transit services in Connecticut for FREE using your U-Pass and valid student ID. More info at CTrides.com/u-pass CTtransit provides local daily service in and around Stamford, with many routes servicing UConn Stamford Campus. More info at CTtransit.com. CTtransit 313 – West Broad Street provides the most service to campus, with service to the Stamford Transportation Center. Bus: CTtransit 311 – Port Chester provides service to Greenwich and Port Chester. CTtransit 971 – I-Bus Express provides service to White Plains (does not accept U-Pass). CTtransit 341 – Norwalk provides service to Darien and Norwalk. New Haven Line (Metro-North) provides service to Stamford Station. Use New Haven Line (Metro-North) to travel to New Haven for connections to CTrail Hartford Line (Hartford, Springfield) and CTrail Shore Line East (New London). The station is a short walk away, or use CTtransit 351 to get Rail: there. U-Pass is not valid on Amtrak (except Amtrak trains between New Haven and Springfield, excluding the Vermonter). More info at HartfordLine. com, MTA.info/mnr, ShoreLineEast.com, and Amtrak.com. New York City: Connections available using New Haven Line (Metro-North) to Grand Central Terminal or Amtrak to Penn Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter4 Existing Infrastructure System Inventory
    DRAFT Existing Conditions Report New Haven Hartford Springfield Commuter Rail Implementation Study Chapter 4 Existing Infrastructure System Inventory The following chapter highlights the existing transportation network that serves the Springfield Line study area. The infrastructure that is discussed includes roadways, livery service, intercity bus, local bus transit, para-transit services, ride-sharing services, and connecting intercity rail. Utilities in the corridor are also evaluated. 4.1 Parallel Roadway Traffic Volumes, Speed and Levels of Service I-91 is the primary parallel roadway competing with potential commuter rail service along the Springfield Line. Route 5, which also serves the corridor, primarily provides local access to commercial land uses, residential land uses and town centers. Speed and delay runs were completed on I-91 during the AM and PM peak periods in the most congested sections of the I-91 corridor; namely, the New Haven, Hartford, and Springfield areas. Specifically, in New Haven, the speed and delay segments were in each direction from Exit 1 to Exit 8. In the Hartford area, the speed and delay segments were in each direction from Exit 21 to Exit 40. Finally, in Springfield, the speed and delay segments were in each direction from Exit 49 in Connecticut, to Exit 13 in Massachusetts. Figures 4.1-1 through 4.1-3 show the travel speeds along Interstate 91 during each peak period for New Haven, Hartford, and Springfield respectively. As Figure 4.1-1 shows, southbound I-91 in New Haven during the AM peak shows significant speed reduction from Exit 6 to Exit 1, with speeds at or below 35 mph.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Station
    Form No. 10-300 (Rev, 10-74) DAM SHEET U1NH tu ai Aic,a uc.r/\Ki ivir,i> i \JT i nc ii> i c,iviv>»i\. iii : fgf&jfp*^'x- .;:';!: i :;::>::>> NATIONAL PARK SERVICE \ ::::;::::: & •Bif '$• I 5S; NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES I \ 1 ^B • 1 I i INVENTORY -NOMINATION FORM i 11!VI i 1 SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS , AND/OR COMMON . ' •, B LOCATION - - . - . STREET & NUMBER Union Place —NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Hartford .VICINITY OF 1st - William Cotter STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Connecticut 09 Hartford 003: HCLASSIFI CATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE _DISTRICT —PUBLIC XOCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM -KL-BUILDINGIS) X.PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS ^-EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE P U B LI C ACQU 1 SITI O N ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT —IN PROCESS —YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED X_YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL ^.TRANSPORTATION _NO,, ' •-. .;-•;,<-., - . -- . •.;-. ? , ; ^.MILITiAflY *LOTHER: [OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME The Connecticut Company 53 Street CITY. TOWN LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDS/ETC. Hartford City Clerk STREET & NUMBER CITY, TOWN STATE Hartford CT TITLE DATE .FEDERAL ^.STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL CITY, TOWN DESCRIPTION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED XORIGINALSITE 3C-GOOD _RUINS —MOVED —FAIR —UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IFKNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCI Hartford Union Station occupies an entire downtown block adjacent to Bushnell Park* The area Is one of street-level commercial activity and multi-story buildings of various heights. The station consists of a large three-story central mass flanked by two somewhat smaller two-story wings, all rectangular in plan* The whole building is constructed of brownstone from Eortlandy Connecticut, cut into large, rough-faced blocks, and is in the Romanttfque style cheated by H.
    [Show full text]
  • Skyjackers Deman(D Ransom Publication Beverage World
    2 1 TllK HKKAl.n. Mon . IXh . Coke vs. Pepsi PZC Davis decision ... page 3 Great cola conflict is battle of syrup despite titans' many products Cold Wednesday Manchester, Cohn. By D.J. Rosenbaum said. “You’re seeing what's good with flurries United Press International with America. You're seeing quali­ — See page *2 Tues., Dec. 8, 1981 It is a war for nothing less than ty. We think we are selling Coke, but 25 Cents world domination, the great Cola we're doing it by showing what's conflict. good with America by showing good In grocery stores, over the air­ times, by showing quality.” waves and in newsprint, it is fought Pepsi’s philosophy, in turn, is that with hoopla and hype for territory "it’s people (who) ought to be the and for the allegiance of literally heroes of our commercials,” Block billions of thirsty people. said. “What we’re really selling is a “When it comes to Coke and Pep­ lifestyle, is what people. aspire to. si, people have a better brand loyal­ And part of the lifestyle is being P E P ^ I part of the Pepsi Generation.” ty than other soft drinks,” said Bob 1^ Em IT ^71 Lederer, editor of the industry But the Challenge, which is run­ ning in about 75 percent of the Skyjackers deman(d ransom publication Beverage World. “ 1 don't know very many people at all nation’s markets, does not really who d o n ’t have a s ta te d lend itself to that.
    [Show full text]