DOCSLIB.ORG

2.3 Minority Population (Sheets 1-12)  New Haven - Hartford 1A 1B Springfield Hamden Commuter Rail Project # 170-2296

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2.3 Minority Population (Sheets 1-12)  New Haven - Hartford 1A 1B Springfield Hamden Commuter Rail Project # 170-2296 2.3 Minority Population (Sheets 1-12) New Haven - Hartford 1A 1B Springfield Hamden Commuter Rail Project # 170-2296 3A 2B Hamden North Haven 2A Hamden North Haven 1B New Haven 1A New Haven Minority Population Rail !( Amtrak Station New Haven State Street Station !( Proposed Station Location !( Study Area Municipal Boundary State Boundary New Haven Minority Population Percent Per Block Group Up to 46% 46% - 69% Union Station New Haven !( Greater than 69% East Haven Fe et 0 510 1,020 1,530 2,040 2,550 FITZGERALDDRAFT & GRAPHIC HALLIDAY, INC. PlanningSEPTEMBER Consultants 1, 2011 72 Cedar Street, Hartford,CT 06106 (860) 247-7200 www.fhipl an.com [ Data Source: 2009 American Data Source: 2009 American Community Survey Community Survey SeptemberJuly 2011 2011 – Fitzgerald- Fitzgerald & Halliday, & Halliday, Inc. - Original Inc. in– ColorProject # 709.01 – Original in Color New Haven - Hartford 2A 2B Springfield Commuter Rail Project # 170-2296 4A Cheshire 3B Wallingford 3A 2B Hamden !(North Haven Station North Haven 2A North Haven 1B East Haven 1A New Haven North Haven Branford Minority Population Rail !( Amtrak Station !( Proposed Station Location Study Area Municipal Boundary State Boundary Minority Population Percent Per Block Group Up to 46% 46% - 69% Greater than 69% Hamden Fe et 0 510 1,020 1,530 2,040 2,550 FITZGERALDDRAFT & GRAPHIC HALLIDAY, INC. PlanningSEPTEMBER Consultants 1, 2011 72 Cedar Street, Hartford,CT 06106 (860) 247-7200 www.fhipl an.com [ Data Source: 2009 American Data Source: 2009 American Community Survey Community Survey SeptemberJuly 2011 2011 – Fitzgerald- Fitzgerald & Halliday, & Halliday, Inc. - Original Inc. in– ColorProject # 709.01 – Original in Color !( New Haven - Hartford 3A Wallingford Station 3B Springfield Commuter Rail Project # 170-2296 5A 4B Meriden Cheshire 4A 3B Wallingford Wallingford Hamden 3A 2B North Haven North Branford 2A Wallingford Hamden Minority Population Rail !( Amtrak Station !( Proposed Station Location Study Area Municipal Boundary State Boundary Minority Population !(Wallingford Station Percent Per Block Group Up to 46% 46% - 69% Greater than 69% North Haven Fe et 0 510 1,020 1,530 2,040 2,550 FITZGERALDDRAFT & GRAPHIC HALLIDAY, INC. PlanningSEPTEMBER Consultants 1, 2011 72 Cedar Street, Hartford,CT 06106 (860) 247-7200 www.fhipl an.com [ Data Source: 2009 American Data Source: 2009 American Community Survey Community Survey SeptemberJuly 2011 2011 – Fitzgerald- Fitzgerald & Halliday, & Halliday, Inc. - Original Inc. in– ColorProject # 709.01 – Original in Color New Haven - Hartford 4A 4B Springfield Commuter Rail Project # 170-2296 5B Berlin Berlin Southington 5A Meriden 4B Meriden 4A Wallingford 3B 3A Minority Population Meriden Rail !( Amtrak Station !( Proposed Station Location Study Area Municipal Boundary State Boundary Minority Population Percent Per Block Group Up to 46% Wallingford 46% - 69% !(Meriden Station Greater than 69% Fe et 0 510 1,020 1,530 2,040 2,550 FITZGERALDDRAFT & GRAPHIC HALLIDAY, INC. PlanningSEPTEMBER Consultants 1, 2011 72 Cedar Street, Hartford,CT 06106 (860) 247-7200 www.fhipl an.com [ Data Source: 2009 American Data Source: 2009 American Community Survey Community Survey SeptemberJuly 2011 2011 – Fitzgerald- Fitzgerald & Halliday, & Halliday, Inc. - Original Inc. in– ColorProject # 709.01 – Original in Color New Britain Newington New Haven - Hartford 5A 5B Springfield Commuter Rail Project # 170-2296 Farmington 6B Newington New Britain 6A !(Berlin Station 5B Berlin Berlin Middletown 5A Middletown 4B Meriden Middlefield 4A Berlin Minority Population Rail !( Amtrak Station !( Proposed Station Location Study Area Municipal Boundary State Boundary Minority Population Percent Per Block Group Up to 46% 46% - 69% Greater than 69% Meriden Fe et 0 510 1,020 1,530 2,040 2,550 FITZGERALDDRAFT & GRAPHIC HALLIDAY, INC. PlanningSEPTEMBER Consultants 1, 2011 72 Cedar Street, Hartford,CT 06106 (860) 247-7200 www.fhipl an.com [ Data Source: 2009 American Data Source: 2009 American Community Survey Community Survey SeptemberJuly 2011 2011 – Fitzgerald- Fitzgerald & Halliday, & Halliday, Inc. - Original Inc. in– ColorProject # 709.01 – Original in Color New Haven - Hartford 6A 6B Springfield Commuter Rail Project # 170-2296 West Hartford Avon 7B West Hartford 7A Farmington 6B Newington Newington Junction Station !( New Britain 6A Newington 5B Berlin New Britain 5A Minority Population Rail !( Amtrak Station Newington !( Proposed Station Location Study Area Municipal Boundary State Boundary New Britain Minority Population Percent Per Block Group Up to 46% 46% - 69% Greater than 69% Fe et 0 510 1,020 1,530 2,040 2,550 FITZGERALDDRAFT & GRAPHIC HALLIDAY, INC. PlanningSEPTEMBER Consultants 1, 2011 72 Cedar Street, Hartford,CT 06106 (860) 247-7200 Berlin www.fhipl an.com [ Data Source: 2009 American Data Source: 2009 American Community Survey Community Survey SeptemberJuly 2011 2011 – Fitzgerald- Fitzgerald & Halliday, & Halliday, Inc. - Original Inc. in– ColorProject # 709.01 – Original in Color New Haven - Hartford 7A 7B Springfield Commuter Rail Project # 170-2296 9A Bloomfield Windsor 8B 8A 7B West Hartford Hartf ord 7A Hartf ord West Hartford Station 6B West Hartford !( Wethersfield Newington 6A Hartf ord Rocky Hill !(Hartf ord Unio n Sta tion Minority Population Rail !( Amtrak Station !( Proposed Station Location Study Area Municipal Boundary State Boundary Minority Population Percent Per Block Group Up to 46% 46% - 69% Greater than 69% Fe et 0 510 1,020 1,530 2,040 2,550 Wethersfield FITZGERALDDRAFT & GRAPHIC HALLIDAY, INC. Newington PlanningSEPTEMBER Consultants 1, 2011 72 Cedar Street, Hartford,CT 06106 (860) 247-7200 www.fhipl an.com Newington Junction Station [ Data Source: 2009 American Data Source: 2009 American Community Survey !( Community Survey SeptemberJuly 2011 2011 – Fitzgerald- Fitzgerald & Halliday, & Halliday, Inc. - Original Inc. in– ColorProject # 709.01 – Original in Color New Haven - Hartford Windsor Station 8A Windsor 8B !( Springfield Commuter Rail Project # 170-2296 9B South Windsor East Windsor 9A Windsor 8B South Windsor 8A 7B Hartf ord East Hartford Windsor 7A Hartf ord Glastonbury Minority Population Rail !( Amtrak Station !( Proposed Station Location Study Area Municipal Boundary State Boundary South Windsor Minority Population Percent Per Block Group Up to 46% East Hartford 46% - 69% Greater than 69% Fe et 0 510 1,020 1,530 2,040 2,550 FITZGERALDDRAFT & GRAPHIC HALLIDAY, INC. PlanningSEPTEMBER Consultants 1, 2011 72 Cedar Street, Hartford,CT 06106 (860) 247-7200 www.fhipl an.com [ Data Source: 2009 American Data Source: 2009 American Community Survey Community Survey SeptemberJuly 2011 2011 – Fitzgerald- Fitzgerald & Halliday, & Halliday, Inc. - Original Inc. in– ColorProject # 709.01 – Original in Color Enfield New Haven - Hartford 9A 9B Springfield Commuter Rail Project # 170-2296 10B Suffield Enfield 10A East Windsor Windsor Locks 9B East Windsor Windsor Locks 9A Windsor South Windsor 8B Windsor Locks Station Windsor !( East Windsor 8A Minority Population Rail !( Amtrak Station !( Proposed Station Location Study Area Municipal Boundary State Boundary Minority Population Percent Per Block Group Up to 46% 46% - 69% Greater than 69% South Windsor Windsor Fe et 0 510 1,020 1,530 2,040 2,550 FITZGERALDDRAFT & GRAPHIC HALLIDAY, INC. PlanningSEPTEMBER Consultants 1, 2011 Windsor Station 72 Cedar Street, Hartford,CT 06106 (860) 247-7200 !( www.fhipl an.com [ Data Source: 2009 American Data Source: 2009 American Community Survey Community Survey SeptemberJuly 2011 2011 – Fitzgerald- Fitzgerald & Halliday, & Halliday, Inc. - Original Inc. in– ColorProject # 709.01 – Original in Color New Haven - Hartford 10A 10B Springfield Commuter Rail Project # 170-2296 12A 11 B !(Enfield Station 11 A Suffield 10B Enfield Suffield 10A Windsor Locks 9B East Windsor Suffield Windsor Enfield 9A Enfield Minority Population Rail !( Amtrak Station !( Proposed Station Location Study Area Municipal Boundary State Boundary Minority Population Percent Per Block Group Up to 46% 46% - 69% Greater than 69% Fe et Windsor Locks 0 510 1,020 1,530 2,040 2,550 FITZGERALDDRAFT & GRAPHIC HALLIDAY, INC. PlanningSEPTEMBER Consultants 1, 2011 72 Cedar Street, Hartford,CT 06106 (860) 247-7200 www.fhipl an.com [ Data Source: 2009 American East Windsor Data Source: 2009 American Community Survey Community Survey SeptemberJuly 2011 2011 – Fitzgerald- Fitzgerald & Halliday, & Halliday, Inc. - Original Inc. in– ColorProject # 709.01 – Original in Color New Haven - Hartford 11A 11B Springfield Commuter Rail Project # 170-2296 12A 11 B 11 A Suffield Enfield 10B 10A Minority Population Rail !( Amtrak Station !( Proposed Station Location Study Area Municipal Boundary State Boundary Suffield Minority Population Percent Per Block Group Up to 46% Enfield 46% - 69% Greater than 69% Fe et 0 510 1,020 1,530 2,040 2,550 FITZGERALDDRAFT & GRAPHIC HALLIDAY, INC. PlanningSEPTEMBER Consultants 1, 2011 72 Cedar Street, Hartford,CT 06106 (860) 247-7200 www.fhipl an.com [ Data Source: 2009 American Data Source: 2009 American Community Survey Community Survey SeptemberJuly 2011 2011 – Fitzgerald- Fitzgerald & Halliday, & Halliday, Inc. - Original Inc. in– ColorProject # 709.01 – Original in Color New Haven - Hartford 12A Springfield Commuter Rail Project # 170-2296 12A !(Springfield Layover 11 B 11 A !(Springfield Union Station Suffield Enfield 10B 10A Minority Population Rail !( Amtrak Station !( Proposed Station Location Study Area Municipal Boundary State Boundary Minority Population Percent Per Block Group Up to 46% 46% - 69% Greater than 69% Fe et 0 510 1,020 1,530 2,040 2,550 FITZGERALDDRAFT & GRAPHIC HALLIDAY, INC. PlanningSEPTEMBER Consultants 1, 2011 72 Cedar Street, Hartford,CT 06106 (860) 247-7200 www.fhipl an.com [ Data Source: 2009 American Data Source: 2009 American Community Survey Community Survey SeptemberJuly 2011 2011 – Fitzgerald- Fitzgerald & Halliday, & Halliday, Inc. - Original Inc. in– ColorProject # 709.01 – Original in Color.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ozone and PM2.5 Air Quality Conformity Determination of the 2019-2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plans and the 2021-2024 Transportation Improvement Programs
    Ozone and PM2.5 Air Quality Conformity Determination of the 2019-2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plans and the 2021-2024 Transportation Improvement Programs Connecticut Department of Transportation April 2020 Page 1 of 32 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 3 2. What is Transportation Conformity? ................................................................................................... 5 3. Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas in Connecticut ...................................................................... 5 a. Ozone Nonattainment Areas ........................................................................................................... 5 b. PM2.5 Maintenance Area ................................................................................................................ 7 c. Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Areas ............................................................................................ 8 d. PM10 Attainment Area – Limited Maintenance ............................................................................... 8 e. State of Connecticut Nonattainment/Attainment Maps .................................................................. 9 4. How Does Connecticut Demonstrate Conformity? ............................................................................ 11 a. Transportation Planning Work Program .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • State Projects Scheduled for Advertising
    Connecticut Department of Transportation Updated: 9/9/21 State Projects Scheduled for Advertising September 2021 through August 2022 Project Location Route Description Improvement Scope Code Advertising Date: 9/1/21 0036-0184 DERBY CT 34 Reconstruction from Bridge St. to Ausonio Dr. RECONSTRUCTION NO ADD CAP K 0172-0506 DISTRICT 2 Various Install High Friction Surface Treatment at HIGH FRICTION E Various Locations Advertising Date: 9/8/21 0171-0469 DISTRICT 1 Various Install High Friction Surface Treatment at HIGH FRICTION E Various Locations Advertising Date: 9/15/21 0011-0156 BLOOMFIELD CT 178 Replace Br 01489 over Beaman Brook BRIDGE REPLACEMNT NO ADD CAP F 0128-0153 SIMSBURY CT 10 NHS - Replace Br 00653 o/ Hop Brook BRIDGE REPLACEMNT NO ADD CAP F 0132-0139 SOUTH WINDSOR I-291 & King St NHS - Rehab Br 05944 o/ Podunk River BRIDGE RESTORATION NO ADD CAP F 0170-3597 STATEWIDE Various Install Centerline Rumble Strips on Town SPOT SAFETY IMPROVEMENT D Roads 0172-0485 DISTRICT 2 Various Traffic Signal Safety Improvements (Proj. #2) TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION F Advertising Date: 9/22/21 0015-0382 BRIDGEPORT I-95 NB Widen Br 03532 to Increase Exiting Capacity REVISE INTERCHANGE RAMPS H at Exit 27A to CT 8 NB 0028-0206 COLCHESTER Various Rehab/Replace Bridges (culverts) 06696, BRIDGE REPLACEMNT NO ADD CAP E 06781 & 06820 0063-0723 HARTFORD I-84 Replace Retaining Wall at South End of Br CONCRETE BARRIER RAIL D 01765 0079-0245 MERIDEN I-91/I-691/RT 15 Interchange Improvs - EB to NB (B/O from REVISE INTERCHANGE RAMPS L 79-240) - RFQ (Design-Build) 0102-0296 New CT 15 Resurfacing, Bridge & Safety Improvements, RECONSTRUCTION NO ADD CAP M Canaan/Norwalk CT 124 to Main Avenue Advertising Date: 9/29/21 0034-0351 DANBURY CT 39 Int.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter3 Alternatives Evaluation
    Final Report New Haven Hartford Springfield Commuter Rail Implementation Study 3 Alternatives Evaluation Chapter 3 Alternatives Evaluation As a first step in determining the alternatives to be evaluated for implementation of commuter rail along the Springfield Line, a "minimum" and "maximum" build, were identified as the initial two base scenarios to be considered. Upon evaluation of the minimum and maximum build scenarios, both were found to have a number of issues related to implementation. The minimum build schedule was found to be unreliable without double tracking at least some additional segments of the rail line. The maximum build was found to have a number of costly elements that may not be necessary for the initial implementation of the line, especially 15 minute peak hour service headways. Therefore, using the costs, ridership, and other analysis from the minimum and maximum build scenarios, four additional possible service implementation alternatives were created for consideration. The following section is a description of the minimum build, maximum build and each of the implementation service alternatives. The entire Alternatives Report can be found in Appendix C of this report. 3.1 Minimum and Maximum Build Scenarios The initial vision of a minimum build scenario was to begin service with minimal capital investment. Therefore, an attempt was made to develop a bi-directional schedule with service every 30 minutes using only existing stations and no additional tracks. The initial vision of a maximum build scenario was to provide service that would attract the highest possible ridership. Therefore, a frequent 15 minute schedule, several additional stations and double track on the entire line were included in the scenario.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Transit-Oriented Development Study
    Transit Oriented Development Opportunities for the South Central Region June 2015 Metro North Shore Line East Hartford Line Contents Table of Contents Executive Summary............................................................1 Introduction........................................................................3 Transit Corridors................................................................6 Demographic Profile..........................................................8 Labor Force Trends.............................................................9 Commercial Market Trends.............................................10 Residential Market Trends...............................................12 TOD Strategies..................................................................14 Approach............................................................................16 Metro North Corridor.....................................................18 Milford Orange West Haven New Haven Shore Line East Corridor................................................65 Branford Guilford Madison Hartford Line Corridor..................................................103 Meriden Wallingford North Haven Conclusion......................................................................141 Prepared by: Transit Oriented Development Opportunities for the South Central Region ii Executive Summary Executive Summary Introduction The South Central Region of Connecticut is home to two existing commuter rails lines and will be serviced by a new commuter rail line in 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B.7 Stations Location and Access Analysis TM
    Stations Location and Access Analysis Technical Memorandum October 1, 2015 Final Version Submitted by: Stations Location and Access Analysis Technical Memorandum Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 3 2. METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 STATION TYPOLOGY .......................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 STATION IDENTIFICATION ................................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 STATION ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................................... 7 2.3.1 Representative Stations and Station‐Pairs ............................................................................................. 9 3. STATION IDENTIFICATION ......................................................................................................................... 11 3.1 EXISTING STATIONS ......................................................................................................................................... 11 3.1.1 Reclassification ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Appendix B Stakeholder and Public Comments and Responses on the Tier 1 EA Table of Contents 1. Letters from Stakeholders and Responses ................................................................................................................... B-1 2. Summary of Public Comments and Responses .......................................................................................................... B-70 3. List of Specific Public Comments Keyed to Responses .............................................................................................. B-81 4. Testimony from Public Hearings Keyed to Responses ............................................................................................. B-103 5. Copy of the workshop report “Dependable Rail in 2016: What Will it Mean for the Knowledge Corridor” .......... B-287 B-i 1. Letters from Stakeholders and Responses a. United States Department of Interior June 20, 2012 b. State of Connecticut i. Department of Economic and Community Development June 22, 2012 ii. Department of Public Health June 22, 2012 iii. Department of Energy & Environmental Protection June 22, 2012 c. Capital Region Council of Governments June 22, 2012 d. City of Meriden June 18, 2012 e. City of New Haven June 21, 2012 f. Town of Newington June 11, 2012 g. Town of Windsor June 22, 2012 h. Town of Wallingford June 13, 2012 i. Regional Plan Association June 14, 2012 j. Greater Meriden Chamber of Commerce June 18, 2012 k. Greater Hartford Transit District June 21, 2012 l. Peter Pan Lines, Inc. June 22, 2012 m. SK Realty June 22, 2012 n. Tri-State Transportation Campaign June 22, 2012 o. Connecticut League of Conservation Voters (not dated) p. Connecticut Fund for the Environment June 22, 2012 q. Robert Fromer June 21, 2012 B-1 B-2 Response to the United States Department of the Interior, June 20, 2012 Connecticut Department of Transportation is working with the Federal Railroad Administration who will be providing direction on any Section 4(f) impacts and required mitigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation & Circulation
    Chapter 8 One City, One Plan Transportation & Circulation KEY TOPICS Travel Patterns Roadways Bus Transit Railway Airports Pedestrian & Bicycle Environment Comprehensive Transportation Planning Efforts Goals & Objectives Adopted June 3, 2010 One City, One Plan– POCD 2020 8- 2 Introduction Department of Transportation (ConnDOT), Transportation & Circulation Connecticut Department of Environmental Transportation plays a critical role in One City, Protection, Natural Resources Conservation One Plan. Transportation themes thread through Service, Capitol Region Council of Governments, the goals of the plan to promote livable and sus- CT Transit and others. The challenge for the next tainable neighborhoods, enhance mobility ten years is to incorporate these planning efforts through transit, pedestrian and bike systems city- and ideas into one comprehensive strategy for wide and by advancing downtown’s role as the the city. One such component included in this regions center for commerce, culture and city plan is called The Hartford Transportations Path- living. Further, the proposed railway and pedes- way Strategy which incorporates the plans in trian plans promote and encourage the integra- and around Union Station into one strategy. tion of sustainable practice in and around the city. Studies and initiatives examined as background in the preparation of this section include: A safe, efficient, flexible and economically viable Capitol Ave with Capitol Building in Background transportation system is essential to ensure that Hartford Traffic Control System Upgrades the City of Hartford can continue to grow and Hartford 2010 prosper. This system, comprised of a surface Hartford I-84 Viaduct Study (HUB of transportation network of highways, streets, Hartford) walkways, greenways, bikeways, and mass tran- ConnDOT 2007 Master Plan sit, and proximity to Bradley International Air- New Britain– Hartford Busway Project port is the basis for its expanding role.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER Fall 2018
    NEW HAVEN - HARTFORD - SPRINGFIELD RAIL PROGRAM NEWSLETTER Fall 2018 FROM THE COMMISSIONER Since the launch of the CTrail Hartford Hartford Line Momentum Continues..............................p.1-2 Line passenger rail CTrail Hartford Line Bicycle Update.......................................... p.2 service this past June, Another Phase of Track Construction Completed.............p.2 ridership has met Ribbon Cutting Ceremony Held at Berlin Station...............p.3 first year projections Hartford Line Releases New Schedule.................................p.3 with approximately Restrooms Reopened on CTrail Hartford Line Trains......p.3 69,000 trips through Operation Lifesaver Update: Rail Safety Week..................p.4 the first six weeks of Photo Gallery............................................................................p.4 service. As proud as we are of the new service, we cannot help but continue to look towards the future and the benefits of the NHHS Rail Program’s next phase. To advance the 2030 Regional Vision, Hartford Line Momentum Continues the new Program phase underway The CTrail Hartford Line continues to includes the design of additional new build momentum since its launch in stations in North Haven, West Hartford, June. Through October 31st, ridership Enfield, Windsor, and Windsor Locks, along the New Haven-Hartford- Springfield rail corridor has totaled over as well as the design of a second track 222,000 passenger trips! This includes between Windsor and Springfield. an average of nearly 49,000 trips per CTDOT continues to seek funding month in July, August and September for construction of these elements. and over 56,000 trips in October. These Once funded, these rail corridor trips are in addition to the nearly 22,000 improvements will allow us to increase trips that were made during the free opening weekend promotion on June Hartford Line service and frequency.
    [Show full text]
  • 30 BRADLEY FLYER Bus Schedule Effective September 11, 2016 30X Bradley Int’L Airport Via I-91
    30 BRADLEY FLYER Bus Schedule Effective September 11, 2016 30X Bradley Int’l Airport via I-91 30N Bradley Int’l Airport via North Main Street BRADLEY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT E l l a G r a L R s ’ s U BRADLEY INTERNATIONAL o T N T N TERMINAL A AIRPORT p I W k 10 e A INTERNATIONAL Y L TERMINAL A i AerLingus ARRIVALS BUILDING 8 g h 9 t SHERATON S American Airlines ch oe 140 ph 20 n oes USPS Delta o te t r il m Jet Blue a Loten H TELETHEATER A UTC AEROSPACE 9 One Jet SYSTEMS LA QUINTA Ra FAIRFIELD INN Southwest inbow DOUBLETREE HOMEWOOD SUITES High QUALITY O United Airlines ld R 34 INN C S a o C in FEDEX u H b HAMPTON n o t O w 75 INN y E PH HONDA O ES 20 T ER P A o irp q or u t o n o 20 c k Riv K Exit 40 er e n n r h e Arche Pat d igh y H STOP & 7 The Poquonock Park & Ride lot is served by the local SHOP 30, 32, 34, 36 & 54 routes, and the 905 & 915 Express. TARGET Exit 39 For complete listings of the trips to this Park & Ride lot for each route, please reference the individual route schedules. VOYA FINANCIAL Poquonock Nor Park & Ride th ! e 6 l KONICA d MARRIOTT MINOLTA MARRIOTT 32 Exit 38 COURTYARD 34 36 54 905 PRICE on HILTON is 915 CHOPPER d GARDEN d A INN P n H o Pigeo ill q u o n o ADDISON c CORPORATE TRAVELERS k Bl 75 oom PARK M !e o ld u n t a i 305 n WHAT THE SYMBOLS ON THE MAP MEAN 305 Timepoints are places the bus is scheduled to reach at a Elm 1 n o specific time (listed on the schedule).
    [Show full text]
  • New Haven Line Capacity and Speed Analysis
    CTrail Strategies New Haven Line Capacity and Speed Analysis Final Report June 2021 | Page of 30 CTrail Strategies Table of Contents Executive Summary........................................................................................................................ 1 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 2 2. Existing Conditions: Infrastructure, Facilities, Equipment and Services (Task 1)............... 2 2.1. Capacity and Speed are Constrained by Legacy Infrastructure .................................... 3 2.2. Track Geometry and Slow Orders Contribute to Reduced Speeds ............................... 4 2.3. State-of-Good-Repair & Normal Replacement Improvements Impact Speed .............. 6 2.4. Aging Diesel-Hauled Fleet Limits Capacity ..................................................................... 6 2.5. Service Can Be Optimized to Improve Trip Times .......................................................... 7 2.6. Operating Costs and Revenue ........................................................................................ 8 3. Capacity of the NHL (Task 2)................................................................................................. 8 4. Market Assessment (Task 3) ............................................................................................... 10 4.1. Model Selection and High-Level Validation................................................................... 10 4.2. Market Analysis..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Amtrak Union Station
    Directions To Amtrak Union Station Moore remains valuable after Waine excoriates falsely or unravelling any piercers. Somnambulism Buddy dehydrogenate appropriately, he fluoridize his accoucheuse very summer. Sometimes ungodlier Flipper underworks her throttlers holus-bolus, but transitory Bogart extemporise westwards or footnotes coherently. How a Score a Great ski on fast Train Amtrak Blog. Baltimore-Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport BWI 324 miles Shuttle service or taxi Amtrak External page to mid Station Maryland. Learn up the Amtrak Los Angeles Union Station California CA station address map. Supreme court decision declaring segregation on board of this browser for directions. Train Boarding Process Amtrak. Riding an Amtrak Train Overnight Tips for possible-time Rail Travelers. Dallas area form of ways to make your right across army navy drive there are served by a direct rail station is limiting bookings are allowed. National park service? Twin Cities-Milwaukee-Chicago intercity passenger ferry service. Amtrak Campus Information. Blue line Route info alerts & schedules CTA. It's a easy connection to Chicago's Union Station where both O'Hare and Midway airports. How ruthless you board Amtrak at rock Station? Union Station Raleigh's Multimodal Transit Center. New models of interest in, which revolve many international is for directions. Amtrak Union being The Official Guide to Portland. Get directions reviews and information for Amtrak Union outlet in Portland OR. The Amtrak station is about State embassy in Schenectady a 10-minute walk or short taxi ride access the campus The Admissions Office did the third work on face right. Naperville fetures 2 Metra stations and also offers Amtrak service view of art Downtown.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Introduction
    DRAFT Existing Conditions Report New Haven Hartford Springfield Commuter Rail Implementation Study Chapter 1 Introduction The Connecticut Department of Transportation (ConnDOT) has initiated a feasibility study for the implementation of commuter rail service between New Haven, Hartford and Springfield, Massachusetts. The corridor was identified as a key component in meeting the goals of improving and sustaining the regional economic vitality and improving regional livability in the Capitol Region Council of Government’s (CRCOG) Regional Transit Strategy (RTS). This was further recognized by the Connecticut Transportation Strategy Board (TSB), which has allocated funding to undertake this implementation study as an important first step in implementing a statewide strategic plan. In addition to serving commuters traveling between the towns and cities along the corridor, the service could provide a connection to: • Bradley International Airport • Multiple links to Amtrak Intercity service • Direct links to the existing Metro North and Shore Line East Commuter Rail in New Haven • Links to the proposed New Britain – Hartford Busway. This report highlights the existing conditions identified throughout the corridor. It includes the following chapters: Chapter 2 – Project Evaluation Criteria Chapter 3 – Existing Rail Corridor Inventory Chapter 4 – Existing Infrastructure System Inventory Chapter 5 – Socio-Economic Inventory Chapter 6 – Environmental Inventory Chapter 7 – Ridership, Fare Revenue and Cost Database As this study progresses, efforts will focus on an evaluation of future alternative build and no-build conditions, the evaluation of rail service alternatives and the publication of a final report summarizing the study process and findings The remainder of this chapter highlights the study area, the public involvement process, summaries of previous studies in the corridor as well as other relevant studies.
    [Show full text]