DOCSLIB.ORG

UTA 50 Timeline.Cdr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UTA 50 Timeline.Cdr The Utah Transit UTA acquires Authority Full three- Ogden City founded by county Lines and residents from UTA connects system in New UTA begins Salt Lake City, headquarters the east and operation. 1970’s Murray, Midvale, operation in west sides of Ridership August opens. November Weber and Davis Sandy and the Salt Lake doubles in one 500 West Counties. 1969 Bingham. 1970 200 South. 1973 1974 County. 1976 year. Utah Transit UTA acquires Weber and Davis UTA acquires Ski Service to Authority March 3 Salt Lake City June Counties August Metro 1975 Alta, Brighton, 1977 District Act Lines. approve Transportation Snowbird and passed by 1970 1972 annexation to 1974 and Lake Shore Solitude is Utah UTA. Motor Coach added. Legislature. Lines. 1980’s Initial planning for a UTA opens light rail system begins Mobility Center at Bus Service through a study UTA started Midvale Sutherland conducted jointly by UTA added to Lehi, UTA wheelchair- Lumber Center and the Utah American Fork, Timpanogos May accessible bus before moving to Department of September Pleasant Grove facility opens service. 4500 South 3 years Transportation (UDOT). and Lindon. 1988 in Orem. 1988 1986 later. 1985 1981 UTA Salt Lake UTA begins Mt. Ogden Bus Service added to UTA opens the new 1989 Central 1988 Paratransit April facility opens. 1986 Provo and Orem, which 1984 Meadowbrook bus facility opens. Service. extended UTA’s Transit facility. 1986 District into a fourth County. UTA service extended to 1990’s A Salt Lake APTA awarded the cities of Willard, County UTA “Best UTA provides Perry, and Brigham City, referendum to Transit Agency transit vehicles in Box Elder County. fund the TRAX in North in support of the light-rail line America” and the Box Elder County Vanpool service 1996 Paralympic through a “John A. Volpe became the sixth county May begins with 27 Games in quarter-cent Silver Safety Award” in the UTA Transit vans. Atlanta, GA. 1991 sales tax fails. 1993 1995 for the second time. 1996 1997 District. UTA extended into a Utah County Transit service Ski service is UTA Rideshare fifth County, Tooele, 1992 expansion 1994 began in Spanish 1996 added to the 1996 program 1997 which included continues Fork, Mapleton, Sundance begins. Tooele, Grantsville, with Alpine Salem, and Resort in Provo Erda, Lincoln, and Highland Payson. Canyon. Lakepoint, and and Cedar Stansbury Park Hills. cities. For an Voters in Salt Lake, Weber unprecedented and Davis counties 2000’s third time, approve a quarter-cent UTA was sales tax increase to named by 2001 - TRAX implement the public APTA as the University of transit component SM January Outstanding Utah Line opens of a 20-year regional December 4 Midvale Rail Transit System of to Stadium transportation Service Center 2002 the Year. 2002 Station. 2000 improvement plan. 1999 opens. 1997 UTA signed an agreement with The 2002 Olympic In its first full year of TRAX light rail UTA opened the Union Pacific Railroad to 2002 Winter Games. UTA 2001 operation, the North- 2000 service begins with 1998 the Riverside acquire 175 miles of railroad coordinated and provided South TRAX line not only the Blue Line from Facility. right-of-way. This purchase is spectator transportation exceeds the initial year Sandy to considered one of the largest during the 2002 Salt ridership projection of Downtown Salt geographic land acquisitions Lake City Olympic 14,100 riders, but Lake City. ever undertaken by a transit Winter Games, exceeds the 20-year agency in the United States. carrying 4 million forecast of 19,000 riders in 17 days. riders per day. The quarter-cent sales tax referendum TRAX Red Line opens passed in Salt Lake to Daybreak, passing through Murray, 2000’s and Utah counties TRAX Blue Line Jordan River Rail Midvale, West accelerating extends to Salt Lake Service Center UTA Hosts APTA Jordan and South construction of the five Central Station. Annual Meeting. opens. FrontLines 2015 projects. Jordan. SM 2003 2006 2008 2008 2011 TRAX Red Line TRAX Blue FrontRunner opens 2008 UTA breaks 2011 TRAX Green extends to 2003 Line Sandy 2006 offering high-speed ground on five Line opens to 2011 University Expo Station rail service along a light rail West Valley Medical Center opens. 44-mile projects, as City. Station. stretch between part of the Weber County FrontLines and downtown 2015 project. Salt Lake City. UTA’s second bus 2010’s rapid transit line, TRAX Green Line Electric Utah Valley opens to Airport FrontRunner buses begin Express (UVX), Station, Blue Line expands to service in begins operation extends to Draper Murray, SM Salt Lake City between Station and S-Line South Jordan, & University Draper, Lehi, Orem Central and UTA hosts the Streetcar opens from of Utah. Provo Central stations Central Pointe to American Fork, APTA Rail Orem and Provo. 2018 via UVU and BYU. 2016 Conference. 2014 Fairmont Station. 2013 2011 Trolley buses UTA provides UTA recieves UTA completes the FrontLines 2015 UTA enters into an 2019 begin service in 2018 transportation 2015 APTA “System 2013 program, more than two years ahead of 2012 interlocal Ogden, Layton for the National of the Year” schedule and $300 million under budget. agreement with Frontlines 2015, a $2.8 -billion program and Farmington Veterans for the fourth Park City and to build 70 miles of rail in seven years, City. Wheelchair time. Summit County was initially scheduled for completion in Games. to start the PC- 2015. Four new lightrail lines and one SLC Connect new commuter rail line have more than service. doubled UTA’s rail system. 2010’s Today, UTA riders take more than 44 million trips every year, across six counties and throughout over 80 cities. We carry Utahns by bus, bus rapid transit (BRT), SM UTA’s light rail, commuter rail, streetcar, paratransit, vanpool, and rideshare services. The Microtransit We've adapted our bus fleet to include hybrid, compressed natural gas, and fully SM autonomous pilot program, electric vehicles, as well as historically inspired trolley buses. We're currently vehicle pilot begins “UTA on researching new transportation technologies, such as autonomous vehicles and in partnership with Demand by VIA” on-demand microtransit services. The future is always changing what's possible, UDOT. begins. and we're proud to be pioneering the way we move in Utah. 2019 2019 2019-Today.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Downtown Salt Lake 4Th Ave
    l C a p i t o Pioneer t Memorial Museum E a s UTAH STATE 300 North CAPITOL . Memory Grove A St. B St. C St. Council C a n y o n R d Hall 500 West 400 West 300 West 200 West Downtown Salt Lake 4th Ave. 200 North e . Conference . p 3rd Ave. North Temple Center Bridge TRAX City Creek Main St Station to AIRPORT – 6 miles State St Park West Templ 2nd Ave. North Temple TEMPLE SQUARE Brigham Young Museum of Church Historic Park History & Art Tabernacle Joseph Smith Memorial Beehive Building House Family History 1st Ave. First Library Lion Mormon Pioneer Presbyterian LDS Temple House Church Union Pacific Arena Temple Square Memorial Monument Depot TRAX Station South Temple TRAX Station 1 Olympic Legacy South Temple Plaza Utah Cathedral 2 Museum of of the Maurice Contemporary Madeleine THE Abravanel City Center (100 S) Cathedral EnergySolutionVivint Smarts Art TRAX Station GATEWAY HomeAren Arena a Hall Church of Harmons Grocery St. Mark Discovery Simply Salt Lake CITY CREEK CITY CREEK Gift Shop Gateway CENTER CENTER Visitor Information 3 1000 SSoSoututh Center 100 South Clark Planetarium 4 5 SALT PALACE Planetarium CONVENTION TRAX Station CENTER N Capitol Theatre 200 SSouth 200 South Old Greektown Gallivan TRAX Station 6 7 Center Rio Grande Depot Pierpont Ave. Gallivan Plaza Pierpont Ave. TRAX / UTA Free Fare Zone & Utah State 8 TRAX Station Historical Museum KUTV2 Main Street News Studio S 3 00 South 3 00 South LINE . 9 E PIONEER BLU , & 00 West Main St 200 East State St 500 West 4 PARK 300 West to Foothill Cultural District 200 West est Temple
    [Show full text]
  • Light Rail Transit (LRT)
    Transit Strategies Light Rail Transit (LRT) Light rail transit (LRT) is electrified rail service that operates in urban environments in completely exclusive rights‐of‐way, in exclusive lanes on roadways, and in some cases in mixed traffic. Most often, it uses one to three car trains and serves high volume corridors at higher speeds than local bus and streetcar service. Design and operational elements of LRT include level boarding, off‐board fare payment, and traffic signal priority. Stations are typically spaced farther apart than those of local transit services and are usually situated where there are higher population and employment densities. MAX Light Rail (Portland, OR) The T Light Rail (Pittsburgh, PA) Characteristics of LRT Service LRT is popular with passengers for a number of reasons, the most important of which are that service is fast, frequent, direct, and operates from early morning to late night. These attributes make service more convenient—much more convenient than regular bus service—and more competitive with travel by automobile. Characteristics of LRT service include: . Frequent service, typically every 10 minutes or better . Long spans of service, often 18 hours a day or more . Direct service along major corridors . Fast service Keys reasons that service is fast are the use of exclusive rights‐of‐way—exclusive lanes in the medians of roadways, in former rail rights‐of‐way, and in subways—and that stations are spaced further apart than with bus service, typically every half mile (although stations are often spaced more closely within downtown areas). Rhode Island Transit Master Plan | 1 Differences between LRT and Streetcar Light rail and streetcar service are often confused, largely because they share many similarities.
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Salt Lake City We’Re Not Your Mall
    DOWNTOWN SALT LAKE CITY WE’RE NOT YOUR MALL. WE’RE YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD. What if you took the richest elements of an eclectic, growing city and distilled them into one space? At The Gateway, we’re doing exactly that: taking a big city’s vital downtown location and elevating it, by filling it with the things that resonate most with the people who live, work, and play in our neighborhood. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH STATE FOR BUSINESS STATE FOR STATE FOR #1 - WALL STREET JOURNAL, 2016 #1 BUSINESS & CAREERS #1 FUTURE LIVABILITY - FORBES, 2016 - GALLUP WELLBEING 2016 BEST CITIES FOR CITY FOR PROECTED ANNUAL #1 OB CREATION #1 OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES #1 OB GROWTH - GALLUP WELL-BEING 2014 - OUTSIDE MAGAZINE, 2016 - HIS GLOBAL INSIGHTS, 2016 LOWEST CRIME IN NATION FOR STATE FOR ECONOMIC #6 RATE IN U.S. #2 BUSINESS GROWTH #1 OUTLOOK RANKINGS - FBI, 2016 - PEW, 2016 - CNBC, 2016 2017 TOP TEN BEST CITIES FOR MILLENNIALS - WALLETHUB, 2017 2017 DOWNTOWN SALT LAKE CITY TRADE AREA .25 .5 .75 mile radius mile radius mile radius POPULATION 2017 POPULATION 1,578 4,674 8,308 MILLENNIALS 34.32% 31.95% 31.23% (18-34) EDUCATION BACHELOR'S DEGREE OR 36.75% 33.69% 37.85% HIGHER HOUSING & INCOME 2017 TOTAL HOUSING 1,133 2,211 3,947 UNITS AVERAGE VALUE $306,250 $300,947 $281,705 OF HOMES AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD $60,939 60,650 57,728 INCOME WORKFORCE TOTAL EMPLOYEES 5,868 14,561 36,721 SOURCES: ESRI AND NEILSON ART. ENTERTAINMENT. CULTURE. The Gateway is home to several unique entertainment destinations, including Wiseguys Comedy Club, The Depot Venue, Larry H.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrorail/Coconut Grove Connection Study Phase II Technical
    METRORAILICOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 & TECHNICAL DATA DEVELOPMENT Technical Memorandum Number 3 Prepared for Prepared by IIStB Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 METRORAIUCOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 Prepared for Prepared by BS'R Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 2.0 STUDY DESCRiPTION ........................................................................................ 1 3.0 TRANSIT MODES DESCRIPTION ...................................................................... 4 3.1 ENHANCED BUS SERViCES ................................................................... 4 3.2 BUS RAPID TRANSIT .............................................................................. 5 3.3 TROLLEY BUS SERVICES ...................................................................... 6 3.4 SUSPENDED/CABLEWAY TRANSIT ...................................................... 7 3.5 AUTOMATED GUIDEWAY TRANSiT ....................................................... 7 3.6 LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT .............................................................................. 8 3.7 HEAVY RAIL ............................................................................................. 8 3.8 MONORAIL
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit
    Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit (LRT) Performance Characteristics Stations Mixed Traffic Lanes* Service Characteristics Newest Corridor End‐to‐End Travel Departures Every 'X' Travel Speed (MPH) City Corridor Segment Open length (mi) # Spacing (mi) Miles % Time Minutes BRT Systems Boston Silver Line Washington Street ‐ SL5 2002 2.40 13 0.18 1.03 42.93% 19 7 7.58 Oakland San Pablo Rapid ‐ 72R 2003 14.79 52 0.28 14.79 100.00% 60 12 14.79 Albuquerque The Red Line (766) 2004 11.00 17 0.65 10.32 93.79% 44 18 15.00 Kansas City Main Street ‐ MAX "Orange Line" 2005 8.95 22 0.41 4.29 47.92% 40 10 13.42 Eugene Green Line 2007 3.98 10 0.40 1.59 40.00% 29 10 8.23 New York Bx12 SBS (Fordham Road ‐ Pelham Pkwy) 2008 9.00 18 0.50 5.20 57.73% 52 3 10.38 Cleveland HealthLine 2008 6.80 39 0.17 2.33 34.19% 38 8 10.74 Snohomish County Swift BRT ‐ Blue Line 2009 16.72 31 0.54 6.77 40.52% 43 12 23.33 Eugene Gateway Line 2011 7.76 14 0.55 2.59 33.33% 29 10 16.05 Kansas City Troost Avenue ‐ "Green Line" 2011 12.93 22 0.59 12.93 100.00% 50 10 15.51 New York M34 SBS (34th Street) 2011 2.00 13 0.15 2.00 100.00% 23 9 5.22 Stockton Route #44 ‐ Airport Corridor 2011 5.50 8 0.69 5.50 100.00% 23 20 14.35 Stockton Route #43 ‐ Hammer Corridor 2012 5.30 14 0.38 5.30 100.00% 28 12 11.35 Alexandria ‐ Arlington Metroway 2014 6.80 15 0.45 6.12 89.95% 24 12 17.00 Fort Collins Mason Corridor 2014 4.97 12 0.41 1.99 40.00% 24 10 12.43 San Bernardino sbX ‐ "Green Line" 2014 15.70 16 0.98 9.86 62.79% 56 10 16.82 Minneapolis A Line 2016 9.90 20 0.50 9.90 100.00% 28 10 21.21 Minneapolis Red Line 2013 13.00 5 2.60 2.00 15.38% 55 15 14.18 Chapel Hill N‐S Corridor Proposed 8.20 16 0.51 1.34 16.34% 30 7.5 16.40 LRT Systems St.
    [Show full text]
  • Director of Capital Development $146,000 - $160,000 Annually
    UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY Director of Capital Development $146,000 - $160,000 annually Utah Transit Authority provides integrated mobility solutions to service life’s connection, improve public health and enhance quality of life. • Central Corridor improvements: Expansion of the Utah Valley Express (UVX) Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line to Salt Lake City; addition of a Davis County to Salt Lake City BRT line; construction of a BRT line in Ogden; and the pursuit of world class transit-oriented developments at the Point of the Mountain during the repurposing of 600 acres of the Utah State Prison after its future relocation. To learn more go to: rideuta.com VISION Provide an integrated system of innovative, accessible and efficient public transportation services that increase access to opportunities and contribute to a healthy environment for the people of the Wasatch region. THE POSITION The Director of Capital Development plays a critical ABOUT UTA role in getting things done at Utah Transit Authority UTA was founded on March 3, 1970 after residents from (UTA). This is a senior-level position reporting to the Salt Lake City and the surrounding communities of Chief Service Development Officer and is responsible Murray, Midvale, Sandy, and Bingham voted to form a for cultivating projects that improve the connectivity, public transit district. For the next 30 years, UTA provided frequency, reliability, and quality of UTA’s transit residents in the Wasatch Front with transportation in the offerings. This person oversees and manages corridor form of bus service. During this time, UTA also expanded and facility projects through environmental analysis, its operations to include express bus routes, paratransit grant funding, and design processes, then consults with service, and carpool and vanpool programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Borough of Ambler, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania
    Transit Revitalization Investment District Study Borough of Ambler Montgomery County, Pennsylvania Carter van Dyke Associates Doylestown, PA Urban Partners Philadelphia, PA Taylor Wiseman Taylor Chalfont, PA Orth-Rodgers & Associates, Inc. Newtown Square, PA February 2012 2 BOROUGH OF AMBLER Contents Executive Summary . .4 Housing conditions . .24 Introduction . .5 Summary of development potential . .25 Why go through this process? . .6 Rental housing market potential . .25 What is a TRID? . .6 Office development potential . .25 Transit-oriented development (TOD) . .7 Entertainment development potential . .25 The general TRID planning process . .7 Retail development opportunities . .25 Planning Phase . .7 Recommendations . .27 Program Management Phase . .7 Planning goals . .27 Implementation Phase . .8 General recommendations for The TRID in Ambler . .8 TRID study area . .28 TRID benefits in Ambler . .8 Streetscape amenities and pedestrian and The TRID Process in Ambler . .8 bicycle access . 28 Ambler’s TRID boundaries . .9 Transit . .28 Parking . .29 Existing Conditions . .11 Zoning and design guidelines for Site description and history . .11 new development . .30 Regulatory issues . .12 Site-specific redevelopment strategies . .32 Community facilities & infrastructure . .12 SEPTA Parking Lot at Main Street and Butler . .32 Existing land use . .12 North Maple Street . .34 Zoning . .12 South Maple adjacent to the Train Station . .34 Environmental issues . .14 Post Office West End Square Site . .36 Natural resources . .14 Northwest Gateway . .36 Threatened and endangered species . .16 Cavalier Parking Lot . .37 Historic resources . .16 Plaza . .37 Environmental impacts and land use suitabilities . .17 Streetscape Expansion . .37 Transportation and circulation . .19 Summary of Findings . .38 Public transportation . .19 TRID improvement infrastructure phasing . .38 Traffic and roadways .
    [Show full text]
  • 720 Light Rail Time Schedule & Line Route
    720 light rail time schedule & line map To Central Pointe View In Website Mode The 720 light rail line (To Central Pointe) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) To Central Pointe: 5:27 AM - 11:42 PM (2) To Fairmont: 5:12 AM - 11:27 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 720 light rail station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 720 light rail arriving. Direction: To Central Pointe 720 light rail Time Schedule 7 stops To Central Pointe Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 6:17 AM - 8:17 PM Monday 6:17 AM - 11:47 PM Fairmont Station 2206 S Mcclelland St, Salt Lake City Tuesday 5:27 AM - 11:42 PM Sugarmont Station Wednesday 5:27 AM - 11:42 PM 2201 S 900 E, Salt Lake City Thursday 5:27 AM - 11:42 PM 700 East Station Friday 5:27 AM - 11:42 PM 2200 S 700 E, Salt Lake City Saturday 6:17 AM - 11:47 PM 500 East Station 2229 S 440 E, Salt Lake City 300 East Station 2233 S 300 E, Salt Lake City 720 light rail Info Direction: To Central Pointe South Salt Lake City Station Stops: 7 55 E Central Point Pl, South Salt Lake Trip Duration: 9 min Line Summary: Fairmont Station, Sugarmont Central Pointe Station Station, 700 East Station, 500 East Station, 300 East 2212 S West Temple St, South Salt Lake Station, South Salt Lake City Station, Central Pointe Station Direction: To Fairmont 720 light rail Time Schedule 7 stops To Fairmont Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 6:02 AM - 8:02 PM Monday 6:02 AM - 11:32 PM Central Pointe Station 2212 S West Temple St, South Salt Lake Tuesday 5:12 AM - 11:27 PM South Salt
    [Show full text]
  • Homeless Resource Center Site Selection
    Homeless Resource Center Site Selection 1 Proposed Sites Map 3 South 1000 West 648 West 100 South 330 East 400 South 131 East 700 South 850 South 300 West 1740 South 300 West 2234 South Highland Dr. 648 West 100 South – Site Description Property Owner: Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City Current Use: Temporary Lease – Arts ??? Zone: Gateway Mixed Use Resource Center Zoning Status: Not Permitted/No Conditional Use Number of Parcels: Six Site Size: 1.78 Acres Purchase Price: $717,000 (Assessed Value) Site Analysis • This site is located near transit and homeless services. • The site is not seen as not conducive to the regional drug trade because it is not located on or near major roads or interstate off-ramps. • The site will require significant utility upgrades. • The site will require mitigation for the noise generated by the nearby heavy rail. The heavy rail also makes it very likely that some amount of environmental remediation will be required. • Given that the property is wholly owned by the RDA, there should be no barriers to completing the transaction. 648 West 100 South – Site Map 100 South 648 West 100 South – Parcel Map 648 West 100 South – Neighborhood Description Council District: 4 Planning District: Downtown Adjacent Zoning: Gateway Mixed Use Adjacent Land Use: Office, Single‐Family Residential, and Vacant Land Homeless Services Parks, Schools, and Daycare • 0.5 Miles from the Road Home • 1.1 Miles from Pioneer Park • 0.5 Miles from Community • No Schools within 1.5 Miles Connection Center Neighborhood Services • 0.5 Miles from Weigand Center / • 0.5 Miles from Gateway Mall St.
    [Show full text]
  • Light Rail Transit (LRT) ♦Rapid ♦Streetcar
    Methodological Considerations in Assessing the Urban Economic and Land-Use Impacts of Light Rail Development Lyndon Henry Transportation Planning Consultant Mobility Planning Associates Austin, Texas Olivia Schneider Researcher Light Rail Now Rochester, New York David Dobbs Publisher Light Rail Now Austin, Texas Evidence-Based Consensus: Major Transit Investment Does Influence Economic Development … … But by how much? How to evaluate it? (No easy answer) Screenshot of Phoenix Business Journal headline: L. Henry Study Focus: Three Typical Major Urban Transit Modes ■ Light Rail Transit (LRT) ♦Rapid ♦Streetcar ■ Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Why Include BRT? • Particularly helps illustrate methodological issues • Widespread publicity of assertions promoting BRT has generated national and international interest in transit-related economic development issues Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP) Widely publicized assertion: “Per dollar of transit investment, and under similar conditions, Bus Rapid Transit leverages more transit-oriented development investment than Light Rail Transit or streetcars.” Key Issues in Evaluating Transit Project’s Economic Impact • Was transit project a catalyst to economic development or just an adjunctive amenity? • Other salient factors involved in stimulating economic development? • Evaluated by analyzing preponderance of civic consensus and other contextual factors Data Sources: Economic Impacts • Formal studies • Tallies/assessments by civic groups, business associations, news media, etc. • Reliability
    [Show full text]
  • TRAX RED LINE Light Rail Time Schedule & Line Route
    TRAX RED LINE light rail time schedule & line map TRAX Red Line View In Website Mode The light rail line TRAX Red Line has 5 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) To Central Pointe: 11:30 PM (2) To Central Pointe: 6:31 PM - 11:16 PM (3) To Daybreak Parkway: 4:42 AM - 10:50 PM (4) To University: 4:51 AM - 5:06 AM (5) To University Medical: 4:46 AM - 10:16 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest TRAX RED LINE light rail station near you and ƒnd out when is the next TRAX RED LINE light rail arriving. Direction: To Central Pointe TRAX RED LINE light rail Time Schedule 11 stops To Central Pointe Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 11:19 PM University Medical Center Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City Tuesday 11:19 PM Fort Douglas Station Wednesday 11:30 PM 200 South Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City Thursday 11:30 PM University South Campus Station Friday 11:30 PM 1790 East South Campus Drive, Salt Lake City Saturday 11:20 PM Stadium Station 1349 East 500 South, Salt Lake City 900 East Station 845 East 400 South, Salt Lake City TRAX RED LINE light rail Info Direction: To Central Pointe Trolley Station Stops: 11 605 E 400 S, Salt Lake City Trip Duration: 26 min Line Summary: University Medical Center, Fort Library Station Douglas Station, University South Campus Station, 217 E 400 S, Salt Lake City Stadium Station, 900 East Station, Trolley Station, Library Station, Courthouse Station, 900 South Courthouse Station Station, Ballpark Station, Central Pointe Station 900 South Station 877 S 200 W, Salt Lake City Ballpark Station 212 W 1300 S, Salt Lake City Central Pointe Station Direction: To Central Pointe TRAX RED LINE light rail Time Schedule 16 stops To Central Pointe Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 7:36 PM - 8:36 PM Monday 6:11 PM - 10:56 PM Daybreak Parkway Station 11383 S Grandville Ave, South Jordan Tuesday 6:11 PM - 10:56 PM South Jordan Parkway Station Wednesday 6:31 PM - 11:16 PM 5600 W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Salt Lake Summer Ozone Study
    The Great Salt Lake Summer Ozone Study John Horel, Erik Crosman, Alex Jacques, Brian Blaylock, Ansley Long, University of Utah Seth Arens, Utah Division of Air Quality; Randy Martin, Utah State University and John Sohl, Weber State University 1 Why is ozone a concern along Wasatch Front? • Background ozone levels in the west are high and likely to increase • Distant, regional, local emissions and transport • Increased wildfires • Prior field & modeling studies by Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) indicated high ozone concen- Salt Lake trations over & near the Great Valley Salt Lake 2 Objectives of this pilot study… 1. Determine the distribution of ozone near the Great Salt Lake during summer 2. Improve understanding of the meteorological processes that control ozone concentrations over and surrounding the Lake during summer 3. Contribute to improved ozone forecasts by Utah DAQ 3 Cost-effective pilot field study • Small budget from Utah DAQ leveraged by other funds • Used existing infrastructure in our own backyard to reduce costs • Real-time data collection and analysis: 1 June - 31 August 2015 • Summer study allowed for more graduate & undergraduate student participation Great Salt Lake Causeway 4 Leveraging Existing Resources Real-time Ozone Measurements During the 2015 Great Salt Lake Summer Ozone Study Jacques et al., Paper 7.2 18th Symposium on Meteorological Observation and Instrumentation Instruments Resource DAQ Fixed Site Ozone Monitors DAQ Ozone Monitors - part of regular monitoring network Temporary Fixed Site Ozone Monitors
    [Show full text]