DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of the Social Sciences in Norway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of the Social Sciences in Norway Evaluation of the Social Sciences in Norway Report from Panel 3 – Political Science Evaluation Division for Science and the Research System Evaluation of the Social Sciences in Norway Report from Panel 3 – Political Science Evaluation Division for Science and the Research System © The Research Council of Norway 2018 The Research Council of Norway Visiting address: Drammensveien 288 P.O. Box 564 NO-1327 Lysaker Telephone: +47 22 03 70 00 [email protected] www.rcn.no The report can be ordered and downloaded at www.forskningsradet.no/publikasjoner Graphic design cover: Melkeveien designkontor AS Photos: Shutterstock Translation by: Allegro Språktjenester AS Oslo, June 2018 ISBN 978-82-12-03695-6 (pdf) Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................................................. 9 Executive summary ............................................................................................................................... 10 Sammendrag ......................................................................................................................................... 11 1 Scope and scale of the evaluation ................................................................................................. 12 1.1 Terms of reference ................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 A comprehensive evaluation ................................................................................................. 13 1.3 The evaluation process and panels ....................................................................................... 14 1.4 Data available to the panels .................................................................................................. 18 1.5 Evaluation process and assessment tools ............................................................................. 21 1.6 The panel’s comments on the evaluation ............................................................................. 23 2 The context: Social Sciences and Political Science research in Norway ........................................ 24 2.1 The research system .............................................................................................................. 24 2.2 Political Science in Norway .................................................................................................... 28 3 CICERO Center for International Climate and Environmental Research ....................................... 31 3.1 Political Science at the institutional level .............................................................................. 32 3.2 Research group: International Climate Policy ....................................................................... 37 4 CMI Chr. Michelsen Institute ......................................................................................................... 41 4.1 Political Science at the institutional level .............................................................................. 42 4.2 Research group: Rights and Gender ...................................................................................... 46 5 Fafo Institute for Labour and Social Research ............................................................................... 50 5.1 Political Science at the institutional level .............................................................................. 51 6 Fridtjof Nansen Institute ............................................................................................................... 56 6.1 Political Science at the institutional level .............................................................................. 57 6.2 Research group: European Climate and Energy Politics ....................................................... 59 6.3 Research group: International Management of Natural Resources ..................................... 62 7 Institute for Social Research .......................................................................................................... 65 7.1 Political Science at the institutional level .............................................................................. 66 7.2 Research group: Politics, Democracy and Civil Society ......................................................... 70 7.3 Research group: VELFERD ..................................................................................................... 72 8 IRIS International Research Institute of Stavanger ....................................................................... 75 8.1 Political Science at the institutional level .............................................................................. 76 9 Lillehammer University College ..................................................................................................... 81 9.1 Political Science at the institutional level .............................................................................. 82 10 Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies .................................................................................. 85 10.1 Political Science at the institutional level .............................................................................. 86 10.2 Research group: Asia research group .................................................................................... 88 11 Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences/Faculty of Landscape and Society ....................................................................................................................................... 91 11.1 Political Science at the institutional level .............................................................................. 92 11.2 Research Group: Global Studies ............................................................................................ 97 12 Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences 100 12.1 Political Science at the institutional level ............................................................................ 101 12.2 Research group: International Conflict, Civil War and Climate ........................................... 104 12.3 Research group Elections, Values and Political Communication ........................................ 106 13 NUPI Norwegian Institute of International Affairs .................................................................. 108 13.1 Political Science at the institutional level ............................................................................ 109 13.2 Research group: Conflict and Security ................................................................................ 111 13.3 Research group: International Governance and Order ....................................................... 113 14 Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Centre for Welfare and Labour Research .................................................................................................................................. 116 14.1 Political Science at the institutional level ............................................................................ 117 14.2 Research Group: Governance.............................................................................................. 120 14.3 Research group: Migration and Integration Research ........................................................ 123 15 Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences – Faculty of Social Sciences ........ 127 15.1 Political Science at the institutional level ............................................................................ 128 15.2 Research group: Organization and Management in the Public Sector ............................... 132 16 PRIO The Peace Research Institute Oslo ................................................................................. 137 16.1 Political Science at the institutional level ............................................................................ 138 16.2 Research group: Conflict Patterns ....................................................................................... 142 16.3 Research group: Environment ............................................................................................. 144 17 Uni Research Rokkan Centre ................................................................................................... 147 17.1 Political Science at the institutional level ............................................................................ 148 17.2 Research group: Democracy, Civil Society and Public Administration ................................ 152 17.3 Research group: Society, Environment and Culture ........................................................... 154 18 University of Agder, Faculty of Social Sciences ....................................................................... 158 18.1 Political Science at the institutional level ............................................................................ 159 18.2 Research group: EIG ............................................................................................................ 164 18.3 Research group: Governance and Leadership in the Public Sector .................................... 166 19 University of Bergen, Faculty of Social Sciences ..................................................................... 169 19.1 Political Science at the institutional level ...........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Master Thesis Cross Sectional Study Comparing the Quality of Life
    Master Thesis Cross sectional study comparing the Quality of Life, Academic stress, Ethnic identification and Alcohol use of Norwegian and international students and examining the relationship between these variables By Mohammad Owais Hadi Master of Applied Social Sciences (International Social Welfare and Health Policy) Faculty of Social Sciences Oslo Metropolitan University 1 Acknowledgements Firstly, I acknowledge the blessings, mercy and grace of Allah who has helped me complete my thesis project as Allah has given me the courage and capability to conduct my survey and write this thesis with the best of my efforts. In addition to that, I would like to acknowledge the efforts of all those people who have helped me conduct my research and write this thesis. The most important amongst them was my supervisor Ashley Muller who guided me throughout my study from advising me to compare the quality of life of international and Norwegian students in a very ethical way to doing data analysis and correcting my thesis. Secondly, I thank all those Norwegian and international students who participated in my study by not only filling my questionnaire but also by promoting it to other students and the Norsk studentorganisajon who agreed to promote my survey to the best of their abilities. Thirdly, I thank the Norwegian data protection official Norwegian Centre for Research Data for providing me the ethical clearance to pursue data collection and Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research who provided me the questionnaire to measure the alcohol use of participants of my study. Finally, I am most thankful to my parents, sisters and friends whose wishes, prayers and support helped me complete this thesis project.
    [Show full text]
  • Opplevelseskartgrorud
    OPPLEVELSESKART GRORUD–ellingsrUD Alna, grønnstruktur, idrett og kulturmiljø 1 Spesielle natur- og kulturmiljøer ALNA, HØLALØKKA OG ALNAPARKEN Alna er en del av Alnavassdraget, som er 17 km langt og et av Oslos 10 vassdrag. Vassdraget er omkranset av frodig og rik vegetasjon, med gode leveområder for dyr, fugler og planter. Langs vassdraget har man funnet 10 patte- dyrarter, 57 fuglearter, 2 amfibiearter, 370 kar- planter og 400 sopparter. Alnas hovedkilde er Alnsjøen i Lillomarka. Hølaløkka ble opparbeidet i 2004 med gjenåpning av Alnaelva og en dam. Økologiske prinsipper er lagt til grunn for utforming av prosjektet med stedegne arter, oppbygning av kantsoner og rensing av overvann. Alnaparken ble etablert i 1998 og er utviklet med mange aktivitetsmuligheter. GRORUDDAMMEN OG TIDLIG Området inneholder bl.a. turveier, to fotball- INDUSTRIVIRKSOMHET baner, sandvolleyballbane, frisbeegolfbane, Alnavassdraget var avgjørende for industri- ridesenter og en dam med amfibier. Området utviklingen på Grorud. I 1867 ble Lerfossen har mange forskjellige vegetasjonstyper, blant Klædefabrikk anlagt ved fossen av samme navn. annet en del gråor- og heggeskog. Enkelte Virksomheten skiftet siden navn til Grorud sjeldne sopparter er funnet i området. Klædefabrikk, og deretter Grorud Textilfabrikker. Groruddammen ble anlagt i 1870-årene som en del av industrianlegget. Like ved demningen ligger en tidligere shoddyfabrikk som drev gjen- vinning av ullmateriale fra opprevne ullfiller. Fabrikkbygningen står fremdeles, men har fått et nyere tilbygg mot turveien. Groruddammen er i dag et viktig friluftsområde som skal oppgraderes gjennom Groruddalssatsingen. 2 GAMLE GRORUD Fra 1830–40 årene startet uttak av Nordmarkitten, best kjent som Grorudgranitt. Fra 1870-årene ble dette en vesentlig arbeidsplass i Groruddalen, og ga sammen med annen industrivirksomhet og nærheten til jernbanestasjonen, grunnlag for lokalsamfunnet Grorud.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins and Early Years of IASSIST
    The Origins and Early Years of IASSIST A Personal Prologue evolution of IASSIST offers a chance to This essay is based upon my presentation relive its early days vicariously and to on a plenary panel commemorating by Margaret O’Neillby Adams* celebrate the founding and subsequent the 25th anniversary of the founding contributions of the IASSIST community. of IASSIST at the IASSIST annual It also provides an opportunity to survey conference in Toronto, Canada, May, the milieu from which IASSIST emerged 1999. My panel colleagues were Carolyn and to document efforts of international Geda and Ekkehard Mochmann; Laine cooperation in the collection, processing, Ruus chaired the session. All three had storage, retrieval, exchange, and use of participated in IASSIST’s 1974 founding machine-readable social science data. meeting, also in Toronto, and remained active in IASSIST Looking back more than three decades on experiences of thereafter. Although I was part of the late 1960s social the early international data services community can also, science data archives community, at the time of the 1974 perhaps, contextualize contemporary digital library and meeting I was “retired” – at least temporarily, and did not archives challenges, issues, and initiatives. Maybe it can participate in IASSIST’s founding nor formative years. contribute to defining the unique professional identity of its multi-disciplinary members. Carolyn’s and Ekkehard’s 1999 presentations drew upon their personal experiences and memory. Carolyn focussed Hindsight often is 20/20. It seems to be human nature to on her experiences as the chair of the ad hoc committee minimize past challenges met when considering those that that created IASSIST and then as its first association loom and are still to be resolved.
    [Show full text]
  • Liesbet Hooghe -- Cv
    CURRICULUM VITAE: LIESBET HOOGHE Revised: May 2020 Born in Oudenaarde, Belgium Citizenship: United States/ European Union / Belgium Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Homepage: https://hooghe.web.unc.edu Chief Academic Appointment 2011— University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, W.R. Kenan Distinguished Professor of Political Science 2007—2011 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Zachary Taylor Smith Professor of Political Science 2005—2007 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Professor of Political Science 2000—2005 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Associate Professor of Political Science; Adjunct Professor Curriculum for International and Area Studies/ Global Studies (2000—) 1999—2000 University of Toronto, Associate Professor of Political Science 1994—1999 University of Toronto, Assistant Professor of Political Science 1991—1994 Nuffield College, Oxford University, Postdoctoral Research Officer Other Academic Appointments 2016— Robert Schuman Fellow, EUI, Florence 2004—2016 VU University Amsterdam, Chair in Multilevel Governance 1992—1994 K.U.Leuven, Lecturer of European Politics 1990—1992 K.U.Brussels, Lecturer of Political Science Education 1984—1989 K.U.Leuven, Ph.D. in Political Science 1987, 1988, 2013 Certificate of the Essex Summer School in Data Analysis and Collection 1980—1984 K.U.Leuven, Bachelor in Political Science Honors 2017 Daniel Elazar Distinguished Federalism Scholar Award from the Federalism and Intergovernmental Relations Section of the APSA 2016 Stein Rokkan Memorial Lecture
    [Show full text]
  • Stein Rokkan's
    ESP0010.1177/0958928718804932Journal of European Social PolicyFerrera 804932research-article2018 View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by AIR Universita degli studi di Milano Journal Of European Forum Social Policy Journal of European Social Policy 2019, Vol. 29(1) 3 –12 Disproved or vindicated? Stein © The Author(s) 2018 Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions Rokkan’s ‘impossibility theorem’ DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928718804932 10.1177/0958928718804932 on welfare democracy and journals.sagepub.com/home/esp European integration Maurizio Ferrera Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy Abstract In the mid-1970s, the great Norwegian scholar Stein Rokkan argued that the consolidation of the national welfare state was going to set definite limits to European integration. While the impetuous strengthening of the latter – from Maastricht to Lisbon – has largely disproved Rokkan’s factual expectations, developments during the last decade seem to have vindicated the theoretical insights which underpinned his original argument. If appropriately re-elaborated, such insights can help us to identify the conditions under which the economic and social dimension of the European Union might be reconciled in the future. Keywords Stein Rokkan, European integration, state-building, boundaries, welfare Introduction Stretching a bit my language – for the sake of argu- ment and debate – Rokkan’s reasoning might be The Norwegian social scientist Stein Rokkan (1921– defined as a sort of ‘impossibility theorem’: the 1979) remains an endless source of inspiration and nationalization of the citizenry inherent in the demo- fascination for scholars working on European poli- cratic welfare state was going to set definite limits to tics with a longue durée perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • 25 Millioner Til Barn Og Unge I Oslo
    25 millioner til barn og unge i Oslo Oslo kommune får 25 millioner kroner til prosjekter som skal bidra til å bedre levekår blant barn og unge. Storbymidlene tildeles av Barne-, likestillings- og inkluderingsdepartementet og er på 49 millioner kroner i 2011. Midlene skal bidra til å bedre oppvekst- og levekår i større bysamfunn for barn og unge, og særlig rettet mot ungdom i alderen 12 til 25 år. Storbymidlene består av fattigdomstiltak (31,5 millioner) og tiltak som er rettet mot ungdom(17,5 millioner). - Storbymidlene er et viktig bidrag til barn og unge i storbyene som ikke har økonomi til å benytte seg av eksisterende kultur- og fritidstilbud. Tiltakene gjør at flere unge kan være med og at de får positive erfaringer som de kan ta med seg videre i livet, sier barne-, likestillings- og inkluderingsminister Audun Lysbakken. Følgende tiltak i Oslo kommune mottar støtte gjennom tilskuddsordningen Barne- og ungdomstiltak i større bysamfunn: Bykommuner Ungdomstiltak 2011 Fattigdomstiltak 2011 Totalt til disposisjon 2011 Oslo kommune 2500000 3 775 000 6 275 000 sentralt Bydel Grorud 900 000 1 700 000 2 600 000 Bydel Alna 900 000 1 600 000 2 500 000 Bydel Stovner 900 000 1 645 000 2 545 000 Bydel S. Nordstrand 900 000 1 850 000 2 750 000 Bydel Gamle Oslo 900 000 1 650 000 2 550 000 Bydel Grünerløkka 900 000 2 050 000 2 950 000 Bydel Sagene 900 000 1 700 000 2 600 000 Sum 8800000 15 970 000 24 770 000 Detaljert oversikt over tiltak og prosjekter som tildeles støtte i Oslo 2011 – Tiltak mot fattigdom Oslo kommune sentralt Fattigdomstiltak Tilskudd Jobb X – jobbsøkerkurs - Antirasistisk senter 400 000 Leirvirksomhet - stiftelsen Hudøy 300 000 Alle skal med – Bydel Bjerke 200 000 Aktivitetsgruppa Nedre Ullevål - Bydel St.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Rehabilitation Setting Influence Risk of Institutionalization? a Register-Based Study of Hip Fracture Patients in Oslo
    Fosse et al. BMC Health Services Research (2021) 21:678 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06703-x RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Does rehabilitation setting influence risk of institutionalization? A register-based study of hip fracture patients in Oslo, Norway Rina Moe Fosse1*, Eliva Atieno Ambugo2, Tron Anders Moger1, Terje P. Hagen1 and Trond Tjerbo1 Abstract Background: Reducing the economic impact of hip fractures (HF) is a global issue. Some efforts aimed at curtailing costs associated with HF include rehabilitating patients within primary care. Little, however, is known about how different rehabilitation settings within primary care influence patients’ subsequent risk of institutionalization for long-term care (LTC). This study examines the association between rehabilitation setting (outside an institution versus short-term rehabilitation stay in an institution, both during 30 days post-discharge for HF) and risk of institutionalization in a nursing home (at 6–12 months from the index admission). Methods: Data were for 612 HF incidents across 611 patients aged 50 years and older, who were hospitalized between 2008 and 2013 in Oslo, Norway, and who lived at home prior to the incidence. We used logistic regression to examine the effect of rehabilitation setting on risk of institutionalization, and adjusted for patients’ age, gender, health characteristics, functional level, use of healthcare services, and socioeconomic characteristics. The models also included fixed-effects for Oslo’s boroughs to control for supply-side and unobserved effects. Results: The sample of HF patients had a mean age of 82.4 years, and 78.9 % were women. Within 30 days after hospital discharge, 49.0 % of patients received rehabilitation outside an institution, while the remaining 51.0 % received a short-term rehabilitation stay in an institution.
    [Show full text]
  • Health and Social – Unlimited Faculty of Medicine (Pdf)
    Ski em al nfo rmasj on Skjema SFU Referanse 1006647 lnnsendt 1205.2013 17:25:15 Host information about host institution and center Name of centre Health and Social - Unlimited Host institution Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo P0 Box address 1078 BUndern Postal code I City/place 0316 OSLO Telephone 22845300 E-mail address [email protected] Contact person -Contact person Name Professor Kristin M. Heggen Title Vice dean for education Telephone work I mobile 22845376 99575450 E-mail address k. m. heggen®rnedisin. uio. no About the centre About the centre Is the centre already No established at the time of application Describe briefly the plans for establishing the centre (maximum 1500 characters) The consortium consists of the following institutions: Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo (UiO) (host institution); Faculty of Health and Faculty of Social Sciences at Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Science (HiOA); and the Faculty of Health, Care, and Nursing at University College at Gjøvik (GUC. The consortium brings together institutions that have demonstrated excellence in the areas of medical, health, and social education, along with their fields of practice. The consortium and its collaborating partners together cover the core issues in health and social education and practice. Based on the R&D plan, we aim to disseminate excellence and develop new educational and learning models in both education and work settings. The main aim is to create a bi-directional relationship between education and practice.We have selected the following problem areas in which educational innovation will be developed and spread in and outside the consortium: child care and welfare, care of persons with chronic lung disease, chronic musculoskeletal diseases, and elderly citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Web Portals and Internationalisation: a Survey of Norwegian Academic, Research and Special Libraries
    1 World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council "Libraries - A voyage of discovery" August 14th - 18th 2005, Oslo, Norway Conference Programme: http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla71/Programme.htm juli 13, 2005 Code Number: 158-E Meeting: 136a Quality Issues in Libraries DG Web portals and internationalisation: a survey of Norwegian Academic, Research and Special Libraries Maria-Carme Torras Senior Academic Librarian, University of Bergen Library Robert W. Vaagan Associate Professor, Faculty of Journalism, Library and Information Science, Oslo University College Abstract Norway currently has 362 academic, research and special libraries, most of which have developed web portals to provide a variety of online services to users, including part time and distance education users. While most web portals and most services are provided in Norwegian only, the globalisation forces of the information society are pushing institutions to provide an increasing range of services also in English. Based on an analysis of all 362 libraries and web portals, defined in a broad sense, including three illustrative case studies based on typical case sampling (Patton 2002), the article argues that an increasing amount of information will be made available in English on library web portals, but that the process will stop short of full bilingual provision. 1. Introduction 2. Research questions and methodology 3. Overview of Norwegian academic, research and special libraries and web portals 2 4. Range of web portal services in English 5. User education on the web portals: Bibliographic instruction and information literacy 6. The issue of web quality 7. Some typical cases a. Web portals in English only (3): Christian Michelsens Institute, Bergen b.
    [Show full text]
  • Funding Systems and Their Effects on Higher Education Systems
    Funding Systems and Their Effects on Higher Education Systems NATIONAL STUDY – NORWAY November 2006 Nicoline Frølich NIFU STEP – Studies in Innovation, Research and Education Funding Systems and their Effects on Higher Education Systems – Norway Executive Summary In 2002 Norway introduced a new performance-based funding model for higher education in response to growth in the number of students and costs of higher education. The model aims to improve education as measured by the credits and graduates produced, increase research as measured by research publications, and enhance external relevance as measured by external funding. The model is still being developed. Formal explicit links between the fund- ing system and national higher education policies have been established as a result of a re- cent reform in Norwegian higher education (the Quality Reform). The various stakeholders have identified several intended and unintended effects of the funding system on higher education and on the core tasks of teaching and research. Accord- ing to the Ministry of Education and Research, the performance-based funding system will improve the quality of research and higher education, as these are best safeguarded by means of a funding system that emphasises results. The Norwegian Association of Higher Education Institutions (the Rectors’ Conference) has identified several elements in the financing system that contribute to the development of HEIs. Incentives are viewed as a means of encouraging institutions to increase the quality of their educational programmes and research and to implement more structural changes. However, the Rectors’ Conference acknowledges that a funding model with financial rewards could produce unintended effects and advocates monitoring the consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • Somalis in Oslo
    Somalis-cover-final-OSLO_Layout 1 2013.12.04. 12:40 Page 1 AT HOME IN EUROPE SOMALIS SOMALIS IN Minority communities – whether Muslim, migrant or Roma – continue to come under OSLO intense scrutiny in Europe today. This complex situation presents Europe with one its greatest challenges: how to ensure equal rights in an environment of rapidly expanding diversity. IN OSLO At Home in Europe, part of the Open Society Initiative for Europe, Open Society Foundations, is a research and advocacy initiative which works to advance equality and social justice for minority and marginalised groups excluded from the mainstream of civil, political, economic, and, cultural life in Western Europe. Somalis in European Cities Muslims in EU Cities was the project’s first comparative research series which examined the position of Muslims in 11 cities in the European Union. Somalis in European cities follows from the findings emerging from the Muslims in EU Cities reports and offers the experiences and challenges faced by Somalis across seven cities in Europe. The research aims to capture the everyday, lived experiences as well as the type and degree of engagement policymakers have initiated with their Somali and minority constituents. somalis-oslo_incover-publish-2013-1209_publish.qxd 2013.12.09. 14:45 Page 1 Somalis in Oslo At Home in Europe somalis-oslo_incover-publish-2013-1209_publish.qxd 2013.12.09. 14:45 Page 2 ©2013 Open Society Foundations This publication is available as a pdf on the Open Society Foundations website under a Creative Commons license that allows copying and distributing the publication, only in its entirety, as long as it is attributed to the Open Society Foundations and used for noncommercial educational or public policy purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • UNICEF Norge Bydelsanalysen 2020 OSLO
    UNICEF Norge Bydelsanalysen 2020 OSLO Store forskjeller mellom bydelene … og dermed i barns oppvekstsvilkår Forbehold om trykkfeil og endringer UNICEF Norge Bydelsanalysen 2020 - Oslo er basert på bydelenes egen statistikk for 2019. Bydelene har selv rapportert inn statistikken til Statistisk sentralbyrå (SSB). UNICEF Norge hentet ut statistikken i perioden 1.-11. september 2020. Bydelenes statistikk er dynamisk og i stadig endring. Små justeringer kan derfor ha oppstått i løpet av perioden UNICEF Norge har jobbet med analysen (august - oktober 2020). Leseren anbefales å ha dette i mente når rapporten leses. UNICEF Norge tar forbehold om eventuelle trykkfeil og skrivefeil. UNICEF Norges 2 Bydelsanalyse - Oslo Innhold Kapittel 1: Innledning 1.1 UNICEF Norges Bydelsanalyse - Oslo 5 1.2 Metodikk og begrensninger 6 1.3 Variabler 7 1.4 Rangering etter sektor 8 Kapittel 4: Budsjettanalyse 2.1 Budsjettanalyse 10 Kapittel 3: Sektoranalyse 3.1 Barnehage 13 3.2 Barnevern 15 3.3 Helsetjeneste 17 3.4 Kulturtilbud 19 Kapittel 4: Oppsummering 21 UNICEF Norges 3 Bydelsanalyse - Oslo Innledning UNICEF Norges 4 Bydelsanalyse - Oslo 1.1 UNICEF Norges Bydelsanalyse: Oslo Alle barn har rett til en trygg oppvekst for å kunne utvikle seg til sitt fulle potensial. Dette er et bærende prinsipp i FNs barnekonvensjon. I praksis betyr dette at barn og unge i Norge skal sikres likeverdig oppvekstsvilkår uavhengig av hvor i landet de bor og hvor lenge de har bodd i landet. Oslo står i en spesiell stilling med hensyn til lokal forvaltning ettersom Oslo både er en kommune og et fylke. Per 11. september 2020 bor det 152 711 barn og unge i alderen 0-20 år i Oslo.
    [Show full text]