DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1107.0603V2 [Cond-Mat.Soft] 5 Jul 2011 Ical Questions on the Packing of Particles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Dense Regular Packings of Irregular Non-Convex Particles Joost de Graaf,1 Ren´evan Roij,2 and Marjolein Dijkstra1 1Soft Condensed Matter, Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands 2Institute for Theoretical Physics, Utrecht University, Leuvenlaan 4, 3584 CE Utrecht, The Netherlands (Dated: September 22, 2018) We present a new numerical scheme to study systems of non-convex, irregular, and punctured par- ticles in an efficient manner. We employ this method to analyze regular packings of odd-shaped bod- ies, not only from a nanoparticle but also both from a computational geometry perspective. Besides determining close-packed structures for many shapes, we also discover a new denser configuration for Truncated Tetrahedra. Moreover, we consider recently synthesized nanoparticles and colloids, where we focus on the excluded volume interactions, to show the applicability of our method in the investigation of their crystal structures and phase behavior. Extensions to the presented scheme include the incorporation of soft particle-particle interactions, the study of quasicrystalline systems, and random packings. PACS numbers: 61.66.-f, 61.46.Df, 82.70.Dd, 02.60.-x The synthesis of colloids and nanoparticles has ad- In this Letter, we present a novel numerical method vanced enormously over the last decade [1{6]. Currently to study systems of non-convex irregular polytopes, col- it is not only possible to synthesize spherical particles, loids, and nanoparticles. We employ this method to es- but also a wide variety of convex faceted shapes, such tablish a rigorous lower bound φlb to the volume fraction as tetrahedra, cubes and octahedra [1, 4]. Perhaps the of their densest regular packing and to predict candidate most remarkable advancement in synthesis techniques is crystal structures. Our numerical scheme elegantly and the capability to create with high precision and repro- systematically reduces simulation studies of these com- ducibility non-convex, irregular, and even punctured par- plex systems in a two-fold way. Firstly, the problem ticles, e.g., colloidal caps [5], tetrapods [2], octapods [6], of determining overlaps between irregular particles is re- and nanostars [3]. Along with the increased availabil- duced tremendously, especially when these particles are ity of complex shapes, there is the concurrent increase faceted [4], by approximating the particle shape with tri- in the study of their self-assembly into liquid [7], amor- angles [24], since triangle intersections can be straightfor- phous [8, 9], and ordered phases [10]. Especially the or- wardly determined. Secondly, predicting candidate crys- dered (quasi)crystalline structures [10{13] of odd-shaped tal structures is greatly simplified by using the Floppy particles, as well as their material properties, have re- Box Monte Carlo method [25] (FBMC), which efficiently ceived a lot of attention in the past years. Interestingly, analyzes the regular structure on a unit-cell level. We an- the research into dense packings of particles is not re- ticipate our investigation to be the starting point of an stricted to materials science, as it is also connected to exploration of (dis)ordered packings of arbitrarily shaped fields as diverse as discrete geometry and number the- particles, which rivals the current research effort on more ory [14{16], computer science and biophysics [17]. conventional bodies. Predictions obtained from computer simulations on To prove the accuracy of our method, we have repro- the phase behaviour and the self-assembled structures duced the lower bound φlb both for the Platonic and for of these particles have been essential in guiding experi- the Archimedean Solids, see Ref. [26]. We find excellent mental studies and in answering fundamental mathemat- agreement with Refs. [15, 19{21]. The deviation between ∗ −7 arXiv:1107.0603v2 [cond-mat.soft] 5 Jul 2011 ical questions on the packing of particles. Convex ob- φlb and the literature value φlb ranges from 2 · 10 to −3 ∗ jects such as spheres [7, 16] and ellipsoids [9], as well as 3·10 . For all results obtained by FBMC φlb < φlb, be- (semi)regular [13{15, 18{21] and space-filling [22] solids cause compression to the mathematically derived packing have been the subject of intense ongoing investigation. fraction [15, 21] is virtually impossible. However, FBMC However, ordered structures comprised of irregular non- performs remarkably well for these convex shapes: the convex particles have hardly been studied by simulation simulations we performed typically yielded a very nar- because of the numerical challenges in implementing ex- row distribution of crystal-structure candidates near the cluded volume interactions for such systems, due to the closest-packed configuration, the densest of which only complex particle shape and the additional rotational de- required minimal additional compression to achieve the grees of freedom. Only recently were the first attempts given value of φlb. Moreover, for Truncated Tetrahedra made to study such systems, namely for superdisks and we have discovered a new crystal structure, a dimer lat- superballs [23]. tice, with φlb = 0:988 ::: [26]. This is not only mathe- 2 matically interesting, it is also relevant to the study of PI DT DD TT TI ST nanoparticle systems, since Truncated Tetrahedral parti- cles have recently been synthesized [1]. 1 For all prisms and antiprisms with regular n-gonal bases (n > 3), for all Johnson Solids, and for all Cata- 0.8 lan Solids, we have verified Ulam's conjecture [27], which states that all convex objects pack denser than spheres. More importantly, for all of these sets we also find that 0.6 the obtained densest packing for centrally symmetric polyhedra is a Bravais lattice packing, in accordance φ with the conjecture of Ref. [19], and that for the con- 0.4 vex, congruent solids without central symmetry it is not φlb (FBMC) o a Bravais lattice, in accordance with the conjecture of φlb (OBBA) 0.2 o Ref. [20]. Here, we present only the data on the Cata- φlb (OSA) o lan Solids, which are dual to the Archimedean Solids. In φub (ISA) Fig. 1 several bounds to the densest packing fraction for φ 0 sph the Catalan Solids are shown. The outscribed-sphere ap- proximation (OSA) and oriented-bounding-box approx- PH PD DH DI RT TH RD imation (OBBA) yield lower bounds to the maximum packing fraction, the inscribed-sphere approximation [19] (ISA) provides an upper bound. Ref. [26] gives a more comprehensive account of the terminology and the em- ployed techniques. It also lists the values given in Fig. 1 PH PI PD DT DH with 6 digit precision. The ISA in combination with the FBMC result gives a much narrower region in which the densest packing can be found for this group of solids than was previously established. The narrowness of the region can be attributed to the relatively low asphericity of the DD DI TT RT Catalan Solids. Other particle shapes for which we have determined the densest-packing crystal structures include the regu- lar Penta- and Heptaprism: φlb = 0:921 ::: and φlb = TI TH ST RD 0:892 ::: , respectively [26]. The interest in Pentaprisms stems not only from the fact that such particles can nowa- FIG. 1. Upper and lower bounds to the densest pack- days be synthesized [28], but also from the fact that Pen- ing fraction for the 13 Catalan Solids. The graph shows the results for the outscribed-sphere approximation (OSA, tagons offer the exciting possibility of a structure with ◦ φlb, circles), oriented-bounding-box approximation (OBBA, quasicrystalline order in two dimensions [29]. Hence, ◦ φlb, squares), and FBMC method (φlb, connected crosses), we consider the prismatic equivalent of Pentagons, Pen- which give lower bounds to the maximum packing fraction, ◦ taprisms, in our three dimensional (3D) method. Hep- and the inscribed-sphere approximation [19] (ISA, φub, dia- taprisms are studied for the purpose of comparison. The monds), which gives an upper bound to this packing fraction. structures we obtain by FBMC for these Penta- and Hep- The value of the densest packing for spheres φsph is indicated taprisms are the 3D columnar continuation of the two di- by a red line. A visual representation of the Catalan Solids mensional (2D) double-lattices found for Pentagons and is given below the graph, the abbreviations are as follows: Pentagonal Hexecontrahedron (PH), Pentagonal Icositetra- Heptagons, respectively. The prisms in different columns, hedron (PI), Pentakis Dodecahedron (PD), Disdyakis Tria- which themselves form a 2D crystal, are out of register. contrahedron (DT), Deltoidal Hexecontrahedron (DH), Dis- The 2D results, to which we compare our 3D crystals, dyakis Dodecahedon (DD), Deltoidal Icositetrahedron (DI), were established by mathematical techniques [14] and Triakis Tetrahedron (TT) , Rhombic Triacontrahedron (RT), simulations [18]. Our results indicate that a 3D colum- Triakis Icosahedron (TI), Tetrakis Hexahedron (TH), Small nar continuation of a Pentaprism quasicrystalline con- Triakis Octahedron (ST), and Rhombic Dodecahedron (RD). figuration may also exist, since columnar continuations Note the improvement of FBMC with respect to the OSA and OBBA lower bound: the maximum packing fraction can appear to be common for non-space-filling prismatic sys- henceforth be located in the gray area above the FBMC line. tems. For space-filling Tri- and Hexaprisms (and Cubes) we observe both columnar continuations and randomly stacked layers, i.e., the prisms form crystalline planes, but the ordering in different planes is not in register. (irregular) shapes, which may even contain holes, thereby We have also applied our method to study non-convex going beyond existing studies. Fig. 2 shows representa- 3 a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) FIG. 2. Four non-convex particle species and their densest-packed crystals. An Echidnahedron (a), a Great Stellated Dodecahedron (b), Jessen's Orthogonal Icosahedron (c), and a Stanford Bunny model (d). The crystal structures found by FBMC are given in (e) - (h) respectively, which show the unit cell and 7 of its periodic images.
Recommended publications
  • Can Every Face of a Polyhedron Have Many Sides ?

    Can Every Face of a Polyhedron Have Many Sides ?

    Can Every Face of a Polyhedron Have Many Sides ? Branko Grünbaum Dedicated to Joe Malkevitch, an old friend and colleague, who was always partial to polyhedra Abstract. The simple question of the title has many different answers, depending on the kinds of faces we are willing to consider, on the types of polyhedra we admit, and on the symmetries we require. Known results and open problems about this topic are presented. The main classes of objects considered here are the following, listed in increasing generality: Faces: convex n-gons, starshaped n-gons, simple n-gons –– for n ≥ 3. Polyhedra (in Euclidean 3-dimensional space): convex polyhedra, starshaped polyhedra, acoptic polyhedra, polyhedra with selfintersections. Symmetry properties of polyhedra P: Isohedron –– all faces of P in one orbit under the group of symmetries of P; monohedron –– all faces of P are mutually congru- ent; ekahedron –– all faces have of P the same number of sides (eka –– Sanskrit for "one"). If the number of sides is k, we shall use (k)-isohedron, (k)-monohedron, and (k)- ekahedron, as appropriate. We shall first describe the results that either can be found in the literature, or ob- tained by slight modifications of these. Then we shall show how two systematic ap- proaches can be used to obtain results that are better –– although in some cases less visu- ally attractive than the old ones. There are many possible combinations of these classes of faces, polyhedra and symmetries, but considerable reductions in their number are possible; we start with one of these, which is well known even if it is hard to give specific references for precisely the assertion of Theorem 1.
  • BY S. RAMASESHAN Number of Diffaent Kinds of Planes Permitted By

    BY S. RAMASESHAN Number of Diffaent Kinds of Planes Permitted By

    BY S. RAMASESHAN (From thy Department ef Physics, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore) Received for publication June 20, 1916 (Communicated by Sir C. V. Raman, ~t.,F. R.s., N.L.) number of diffaent kinds of planes permitted by the law of rational indices to appear as faces on a crystal is practically unlimited. The number of "forms " actually observed, however, is limited and there is a decided preference for a few amongst them. This is one of the most striking facts of geometric crystallography and its explanation is obviously of importance. Pierre Curie (1885) stressed the role played by the surface energy of the faces in determining the " forms " of the crystal. According to him, the different faces of a crystal have different surface energies and the form of the crystal as a whole is determined by the condition that the total surface energy of the crystal should be a minimum. According to W. Gibbs (1877), on the other hand, it is the velocity of growth in different directions which is the determining factor, while the surface energy of the crystal plays a subordi- nate role and is only effective in the case of crystals of submicroscopic size, We have little direct knowledge as to how diamond is actually formed in nature. It is necessary, therefore, to rely upon the indications furnished by the observed forms of the crystals. One of the most remarkable facts about diamond is the curvature of the faces which is a very common and marked feature. This is particularly noticeable in the case of the diamonds found in the State of Panna in Central India.
  • The Crystal Forms of Diamond and Their Significance

    The Crystal Forms of Diamond and Their Significance

    THE CRYSTAL FORMS OF DIAMOND AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE BY SIR C. V. RAMAN AND S. RAMASESHAN (From the Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore) Received for publication, June 4, 1946 CONTENTS 1. Introductory Statement. 2. General Descriptive Characters. 3~ Some Theoretical Considerations. 4. Geometric Preliminaries. 5. The Configuration of the Edges. 6. The Crystal Symmetry of Diamond. 7. Classification of the Crystal Forros. 8. The Haidinger Diamond. 9. The Triangular Twins. 10. Some Descriptive Notes. 11. The Allo- tropic Modifications of Diamond. 12. Summary. References. Plates. 1. ~NTRODUCTORY STATEMENT THE" crystallography of diamond presents problems of peculiar interest and difficulty. The material as found is usually in the form of complete crystals bounded on all sides by their natural faces, but strangely enough, these faces generally exhibit a marked curvature. The diamonds found in the State of Panna in Central India, for example, are invariably of this kind. Other diamondsJas for example a group of specimens recently acquired for our studies ffom Hyderabad (Deccan)--show both plane and curved faces in combination. Even those diamonds which at first sight seem to resemble the standard forms of geometric crystallography, such as the rhombic dodeca- hedron or the octahedron, are found on scrutiny to exhibit features which preclude such an identification. This is the case, for example, witb. the South African diamonds presented to us for the purpose of these studŸ by the De Beers Mining Corporation of Kimberley. From these facts it is evident that the crystallography of diamond stands in a class by itself apart from that of other substances and needs to be approached from a distinctive stand- point.
  • Convex Polytopes and Tilings with Few Flag Orbits

    Convex Polytopes and Tilings with Few Flag Orbits

    Convex Polytopes and Tilings with Few Flag Orbits by Nicholas Matteo B.A. in Mathematics, Miami University M.A. in Mathematics, Miami University A dissertation submitted to The Faculty of the College of Science of Northeastern University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 14, 2015 Dissertation directed by Egon Schulte Professor of Mathematics Abstract of Dissertation The amount of symmetry possessed by a convex polytope, or a tiling by convex polytopes, is reflected by the number of orbits of its flags under the action of the Euclidean isometries preserving the polytope. The convex polytopes with only one flag orbit have been classified since the work of Schläfli in the 19th century. In this dissertation, convex polytopes with up to three flag orbits are classified. Two-orbit convex polytopes exist only in two or three dimensions, and the only ones whose combinatorial automorphism group is also two-orbit are the cuboctahedron, the icosidodecahedron, the rhombic dodecahedron, and the rhombic triacontahedron. Two-orbit face-to-face tilings by convex polytopes exist on E1, E2, and E3; the only ones which are also combinatorially two-orbit are the trihexagonal plane tiling, the rhombille plane tiling, the tetrahedral-octahedral honeycomb, and the rhombic dodecahedral honeycomb. Moreover, any combinatorially two-orbit convex polytope or tiling is isomorphic to one on the above list. Three-orbit convex polytopes exist in two through eight dimensions. There are infinitely many in three dimensions, including prisms over regular polygons, truncated Platonic solids, and their dual bipyramids and Kleetopes. There are infinitely many in four dimensions, comprising the rectified regular 4-polytopes, the p; p-duoprisms, the bitruncated 4-simplex, the bitruncated 24-cell, and their duals.
  • [ENTRY POLYHEDRA] Authors: Oliver Knill: December 2000 Source: Translated Into This Format from Data Given In

    [ENTRY POLYHEDRA] Authors: Oliver Knill: December 2000 Source: Translated Into This Format from Data Given In

    ENTRY POLYHEDRA [ENTRY POLYHEDRA] Authors: Oliver Knill: December 2000 Source: Translated into this format from data given in http://netlib.bell-labs.com/netlib tetrahedron The [tetrahedron] is a polyhedron with 4 vertices and 4 faces. The dual polyhedron is called tetrahedron. cube The [cube] is a polyhedron with 8 vertices and 6 faces. The dual polyhedron is called octahedron. hexahedron The [hexahedron] is a polyhedron with 8 vertices and 6 faces. The dual polyhedron is called octahedron. octahedron The [octahedron] is a polyhedron with 6 vertices and 8 faces. The dual polyhedron is called cube. dodecahedron The [dodecahedron] is a polyhedron with 20 vertices and 12 faces. The dual polyhedron is called icosahedron. icosahedron The [icosahedron] is a polyhedron with 12 vertices and 20 faces. The dual polyhedron is called dodecahedron. small stellated dodecahedron The [small stellated dodecahedron] is a polyhedron with 12 vertices and 12 faces. The dual polyhedron is called great dodecahedron. great dodecahedron The [great dodecahedron] is a polyhedron with 12 vertices and 12 faces. The dual polyhedron is called small stellated dodecahedron. great stellated dodecahedron The [great stellated dodecahedron] is a polyhedron with 20 vertices and 12 faces. The dual polyhedron is called great icosahedron. great icosahedron The [great icosahedron] is a polyhedron with 12 vertices and 20 faces. The dual polyhedron is called great stellated dodecahedron. truncated tetrahedron The [truncated tetrahedron] is a polyhedron with 12 vertices and 8 faces. The dual polyhedron is called triakis tetrahedron. cuboctahedron The [cuboctahedron] is a polyhedron with 12 vertices and 14 faces. The dual polyhedron is called rhombic dodecahedron.
  • The Gnomonic Projection

    The Gnomonic Projection

    Gnomonic Projections onto Various Polyhedra By Brian Stonelake Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................... 3 The Gnomonic Projection .................................................................................................................. 4 The Polyhedra ....................................................................................................................................... 5 The Icosahedron ............................................................................................................................................. 5 The Dodecahedron ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Pentakis Dodecahedron ............................................................................................................................... 5 Modified Pentakis Dodecahedron ............................................................................................................. 6 Equilateral Pentakis Dodecahedron ........................................................................................................ 6 Triakis Icosahedron ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Modified Triakis Icosahedron ...................................................................................................................
  • Spectral Realizations of Graphs

    Spectral Realizations of Graphs

    SPECTRAL REALIZATIONS OF GRAPHS B. D. S. \DON" MCCONNELL 1. Introduction 2 The boundary of the regular hexagon in R and the vertex-and-edge skeleton of the regular tetrahe- 3 dron in R , as geometric realizations of the combinatorial 6-cycle and complete graph on 4 vertices, exhibit a significant property: Each automorphism of the graph induces a \rigid" isometry of the figure. We call such a figure harmonious.1 Figure 1. A pair of harmonious graph realizations (assuming the latter in 3D). Harmonious realizations can have considerable value as aids to the intuitive understanding of the graph's structure, but such realizations are generally elusive. This note explains and explores a proposition that provides a straightforward way to generate an entire family of harmonious realizations of any graph: A matrix whose rows form an orthogonal basis of an eigenspace of a graph's adjacency matrix has columns that serve as coordinate vectors of the vertices of an harmonious realization of the graph. This is a (projection of a) spectral realization. The hundreds of diagrams in Section 42 illustrate that spectral realizations of graphs with a high degree of symmetry can have great visual appeal. Or, not: they may exist in arbitrarily-high- dimensional spaces, or they may appear as an uninspiring jumble of points in one-dimensional space. In most cases, they collapse vertices and even edges into single points, and are therefore only very rarely faithful. Nevertheless, spectral realizations can often provide useful starting points for visualization efforts. (A basic Mathematica recipe for computing (projected) spectral realizations appears at the end of Section 3.) Not every harmonious realization of a graph is spectral.
  • A Frustrated, Centred Tetrakis Hexahedron†

    A Frustrated, Centred Tetrakis Hexahedron†

    ChemComm View Article Online COMMUNICATION View Journal | View Issue [Fe15]: a frustrated, centred tetrakis hexahedron† a a a b Cite this: Chem. Commun., 2021, Daniel J. Cutler, Mukesh K. Singh, Gary S. Nichol, Marco Evangelisti, c d a 57, 8925 Ju¨rgen Schnack, * Leroy Cronin * and Euan K. Brechin * Received 20th July 2021, Accepted 9th August 2021 DOI: 10.1039/d1cc03919a rsc.li/chemcomm The combination of two different FeIII salts in a solvothermal anomalous magnetisation behaviour in an applied magnetic reaction with triethanolamine results in the formation of a high field.8 III symmetry [Fe15] cluster whose structure conforms to a centred, One synthetic methodology proven to enable the construc- tetrakis hexahedron. tion of such species is hydro/solvothermal synthesis, which Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. typically exploits superheating reaction solutions under auto- Homometallic compounds of FeIII have played a central role in the genous pressure.9 In the chemistry of polynuclear cluster history of molecular magnetism, proving key to the development compounds of paramagnetic transition metal ions, the tem- and understanding of an array of physical properties. For exam- perature regimes employed (which are typically below 250 1C) ple, the study of oxo-bridged [Fe2] dimers allowed the develop- can lead to enhanced solubility, reduced solvent viscosity and ment of detailed magneto-structural correlations that can increased reagent diffusion. The result is often the synthesis of be translated to larger species,1 antiferromagnetically coupled metastable kinetic products of high symmetry, with slow cool- [Fe6–12] ferric wheels revealed interesting quantum size effects ing enabling pristine crystal growth directly from the reaction 2 10 manifested in stepped magnetisation, [Fe17/19] was an early mixture.
  • Chemistry for the 21St Century Edited by F

    Chemistry for the 21St Century Edited by F

    Chemistry for the 21st Century Edited by f. Keinan, 1. Schechter Chemistry for the 21st Century Edited by Ehud Keincrn, /me/Schechter ~WILEYVCH Weinheim - New-York - Chichester - Brisbane - Singapore - Toronto The Editors ofthis Volume This book was carefully produced. Never- theless, authors and publisher do not Pro$ Dr. E. Keinan warrant the information contained therein Department of Chemistry to be free of errors. Readers are advised Technion - Israel Institute ofTechnology to keep in mind that statements, data, Haifa 32 000 illustrations,procedural details or other Israel items may inadvertently be inaccurate. Library ofcongress Card No.: The Scripps Research Institute applied for 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, MB20 La Jolla BritishLibrary Cataloguingin-Publication Data Ca 92037 A catalogue record for this book is USA availablefromthe British Library. Pro$ Dr. 1. Schechter Die Deutsche Bibliothek- CIP Cataloguing Department of Chemistry in-Publication Data Technion - Israel Institute of Technology A catalogue record for this publication is Haifa 32 000 available from Die Deutsche Bibliothek Israel 0 2001 WILEY-VCH GmbH, Weinheim All rights reserved (includingthose of trans- lation in other languages). No part of this book may be reproduced in any form - by photoprinting,microfilm, or any other means - nor transmitted or translated into a machine language without written permis- sion from the publisher. Registered names, trademarks, etc. used in this book, even when not specifically marked as such, are not to be considered unprotected by law. Printed in the Federal Republic of Germany Printed on acid-free paper Composition IWm & Weyh, Freiburg Printing Strauss Offsetdmck GmbH, Morlenbach Bookbinding Wilh. Osswald 61 Co., Neustadt (Weinstrage) ISBN 3-527-30235-2 I” Contents 1 Some Reflections on Chemistry - Molecular, Supramolecular and Beyond 1 1.1 From Structure to Information.
  • One Shape to Make Them All

    One Shape to Make Them All

    Bridges Finland Conference Proceedings Dual Models: One Shape to Make Them All Mircea Draghicescu ITSPHUN LLC [email protected] Abstract We show how a potentially infinite number of 3D decorative objects can be built by connecting copies of a single geometric element made of a flexible material. Each object is an approximate model of a compound of some polyhe- dron and its dual. We present the underlying geometry and show a few such constructs. The geometric element used in the constructions can be made from a variety of materials and can have many shapes that give different artistic effects. In the workshop, we will build a few models that the participants can take home. Introduction Wireframe models of polyhedra can be built by connecting linear elements that represent polyhedral edges. We describe here a different modeling method where each atomic construction element represents not an edge, but a pair of edges, one belonging to some polyhedron P and the other one to P 0, the dual of P ; the resulting object is a model of the compound of P and P 0. Using the same number of construction elements as the number of edges of P and P 0, the model of the compound exhibits a richer structure and, due to the additional connections, is stronger than the models of P and P 0 alone. The model has at least the symmetry of P and P 0, and can have a higher symmetry if P is self-dual. The construction process challenges the maker to think simultaneously of both P and P 0 and can be used as a teaching aid in the study of polyhedra and duality.
  • On the Relations Between Truncated Cuboctahedron, Truncated Icosidodecahedron and Metrics

    On the Relations Between Truncated Cuboctahedron, Truncated Icosidodecahedron and Metrics

    Forum Geometricorum b Volume 17 (2017) 273–285. b b FORUM GEOM ISSN 1534-1178 On The Relations Between Truncated Cuboctahedron, Truncated Icosidodecahedron and Metrics Ozcan¨ Gelis¸gen Abstract. The theory of convex sets is a vibrant and classical field of mod- ern mathematics with rich applications. The more geometric aspects of con- vex sets are developed introducing some notions, but primarily polyhedra. A polyhedra, when it is convex, is an extremely important special solid in Rn. Some examples of convex subsets of Euclidean 3-dimensional space are Pla- tonic Solids, Archimedean Solids and Archimedean Duals or Catalan Solids. There are some relations between metrics and polyhedra. For example, it has been shown that cube, octahedron, deltoidal icositetrahedron are maximum, taxi- cab, Chinese Checker’s unit sphere, respectively. In this study, we give two new metrics to be their spheres an Archimedean solids truncated cuboctahedron and truncated icosidodecahedron. 1. Introduction A polyhedron is a three-dimensional figure made up of polygons. When dis- cussing polyhedra one will use the terms faces, edges and vertices. Each polygonal part of the polyhedron is called a face. A line segment along which two faces come together is called an edge. A point where several edges and faces come together is called a vertex. That is, a polyhedron is a solid in three dimensions with flat faces, straight edges and vertices. A regular polyhedron is a polyhedron with congruent faces and identical ver- tices. There are only five regular convex polyhedra which are called Platonic solids. A convex polyhedron is said to be semiregular if its faces have a similar configu- ration of nonintersecting regular plane convex polygons of two or more different types about each vertex.
  • Star and Convex Regular Polyhedra by Origami. Build Polyhedra by Origami.]

    Star and Convex Regular Polyhedra by Origami. Build Polyhedra by Origami.]

    Star and convex regular polyhedra by Origami. Build polyhedra by Origami.] Marcel Morales Alice Morales 2009 E D I T I O N M ORALES Polyhedron by Origami I) Table of convex regular Polyhedra ................................................................................................. 4 II) Table of star regular Polyhedra (non convex) .............................................................................. 5 III) Some Polyhedra that should be named regular done with equilateral triangles .......................... 6 IV) Some Polyhedra that should be named regular done with rectangle triangles ............................ 7 V) Some geometry of polygons ........................................................................................................ 9 VI) The convex regular polygons ..................................................................................................... 12 VII) The star regular polygons .......................................................................................................... 12 VIII) Regular convex polygons by folding paper ............................................................................. 14 1) The square .......................................................................................................................................... 14 2) The equilateral triangle ....................................................................................................................... 14 3) The regular pentagon .........................................................................................................................