Written Answers to Questions Not Answered at Mayor's Question Time on 22 June 2016
Parking enforcement of taxi ranks Question No: 2016/1849 Caroline Pidgeon What steps is Transport for London taking to encourage London Councils to ensure there are consistent policies over the enforcement of parking restrictions in taxi ranks across the whole of London?
The Mayor
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
TfL is working with London Councils to encourage a more consistent and effective approach to taxi rank parking restrictions.
This has taken the form of joint working, shared information and changes to business process to support effective on-street enforcement. TfL is also working closely with key boroughs in central London as part of Operation Neon, a high visibility enforcement operation under which multi-agency teams are deployed to agreed priority areas to deter and disrupt illegal and non- compliant private hire activity. For example, Taxi and Private Hire Compliance Officers regularly patrol alongside Westminster City Council officers. Backlog of taxi ranks Question No: 2016/1850 Caroline Pidgeon How many new taxi ranks were created by TfL in (a) 2014 (b) 2015 (c) are planned for 2016?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
The numbers of new taxi ranks appointed in the capital in these timescales are:
2013/14 - 16 new ranks
2014/15 - 13 new ranks
2015/16 - 32 new ranks
Seven new taxi ranks have been appointed since 1 April 2016 and a further 11 have been agreed, in principle, across four London boroughs. These will be consulted on publicly. TfL will continue to pursue further opportunities to implement new ranks across London throughout 2016. Implementation of TfL's Ranks Action Plan Question No: 2016/1851 Caroline Pidgeon Please provide an update as to the steps that have been implemented since the publication of the taxi ranks action plan in February 2015?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
Since the Ranks Action Plan was published in February 2015, 42 new taxi ranks have been delivered, including some at stations that will be served by the Night Tube.
TfL has carried out a full review of the existing taxi rank network to assess ranks' accessibility and to identify potential improvements. As part of this, TfL held workshops and engagement sessions with key stakeholders.
TfL has intensified its engagement with all boroughs by making them aware of its intention to increase the number of ranks across London and actively seeking support from the chief executive of a borough when requesting specific ranks.
TfL is also currently working with Westminster City Council and the Cab Ranks Committee , which is organised and chaired by representatives of the main trade associations, to collate a list of new taxi rank requests which TfL will fund.
TfL has collected geocode data for all ranks in London. This information will be published online and made freely available to app developers and TfL Journey Planner as part of TfL's open data policy. It has also published a policy on island ranks and taxi extension areas.
Finally, forums for suburban taxi drivers took place in each sector for the first time last year and will now take place annually. This has proved to be a constructive opportunity to engage with suburban drivers regarding a number of issues, including issues around existing ranks and requests for new ranks. London Overground passengers Question No: 2016/1852 Caroline Pidgeon London Underground provides staff to assist passengers with every rail replacement bus. Why is there not a similar service provided to London Overground passengers?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
London Overground always carefully considers support for customers when rail replacement buses operate, including provision of staff.
In some instances, including many blockades, the nature of rail replacement provision may change over the course of the closure. For example, in the case of the current Gospel Oak to Barking closure, additional staff were deployed at all stations and rail replacement bus stops for the first week, then at a smaller number of key stations for the full duration of the closure.
This approach is adopted because passenger data suggests regular customers quickly establish new travel patterns, so deploying staff at all locations for duration of a blockade may not be the best use of resources These arrangements are closely monitored and can be changed if necessary. So far though, arrangements on the Barking to Gospel Oak closure are working well. Barking-Gospel Oak Overground closure Question No: 2016/1853 Caroline Pidgeon In answer to Mayoral Questions 2016/008 and 2016/0054 very clear assurances were given about a replacement bus service during the closure of the Barking-Gospel Oak Overground closure and assistance that will be provided to customers. Why are these undertakings not being fully met?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
London Overground is providing rail replacement bus services during the full duration of the closure alongside comprehensive customer communications to help customers complete their journeys. Additional staff will be based at stations and rail replacement bus stops for the first week of each blockade, then at a smaller number of key stations for the full duration of the closure.
This approach is adopted because experience suggests that regular customers quickly establish new travel patterns and so deploying staff at all locations for the full period of the blockade would be unnecessarily costly. These arrangements are kept under review and can be changed quickly should the need arise, but appear to be working well so far on the Gospel Oak to Barking closure. These arrangements are supported by a comprehensive customer information programme.
Oyster/Contactless Gatwick Route Fares Question No: 2016/1854 Caroline Pidgeon What steps are you planning to take to introduce zonal Oyster/Contactless fares to and from Gatwick Airport?
The Mayor
Since the launch in mid-January 2016, the use of Oyster and contactless to and from Gatwick has gone from strength to strength. Some 20,000 journeys a week were made in the first week. By early June, the weekly figure had risen to over 60,000 journeys and it is continuing to increase.
The fares for using Oyster and Contactless to and from Gatwick, which is entirely outside the Greater London Area, are set by the train company, GTR. GTR has made it clear that it does not wish the extension to be part of the London zonal fares system given their view of the potential loss of revenue from charging lower fares. Retention of video recordings from CCTV operating on London buses Question No: 2016/1855 Caroline Pidgeon Please state the length of time that video recordings from CCTV operating on London buses are maintained and stored before being overwritten or deleted? Has any consideration been given to permanent or long term storage to help assist inquiries about driver behaviour and investigations into collisions involving buses?
The Mayor
TfL's vehicle specification for new buses requires the CCTV hard drive to store images for at least 240 hours which, when taking into account the average hours a bus is in service in each 24-hour period, means they do not over write for two to three weeks.
If a bus is involved in an incident, there are effective procedures in place to obtain and retain images for permanent storage, such as for police or operator investigations.
Given that there are 9,000 vehicles in the fleet, it would not be practical or a good use of resources to download all images for long-term retention in case a late request is made. In addition, it would not be compliant with data protection legislation to keep CCTV indefinitely.
Direct Vision Lorries Question No: 2016/1856 Caroline Pidgeon During the Mayoral election you made the following welcome pledge, which I welcome:
"And I will promote safer, cleaner lorries. I will work with the boroughs and using City Hall procurement to set new safety standards, work to make sure City Hall and TfL contracts specify 'direct-vision' lorries, and use planning and other powers available to me, so that the safest lorry types become the norm on London's streets as soon as possible."
Please set out the steps and timetable you now intend to take to implement this pledge.
The Mayor
Heavy Goods Vehicles with maximum direct vision are available now and are successfully working in TfL's supply chain. I intend to quickly increase the number of these safer trucks seen on London's streets and have asked TfL to develop a plan to do this by this autumn.
TfL will continue to work with vehicle manufacturers, operators, trade bodies and cycling groups to raise awareness of these safer trucks and provide advice to construction projects across London as they develop this plan. Tooting Bec Road Question No: 2016/1857 Caroline Pidgeon Will you ensure that TfL works with Wandsworth Council to ensure that high quality segregated cycle routes are provided on Tooting Bec Road?
The Mayor
TfL is working with the London Borough of Wandsworth to improve cycle provision as part of Quietway 5 (Waterloo to Croydon).
Options are being considered, including segregated facilities, along Tooting Bec Road between Tooting Bec Lido by Aldrington Road, and opposite Riggindale Road. Subject to approval, construction is planned for 2017.
Extension of the Bakerloo Line Question No: 2016/1858 Caroline Pidgeon Since the average distance between stations on the Bakerloo Line is less than 1 kilometre is there not a case for considering three new stations between Elephant and Castle and New Cross Gate as part of the proposed extension of the line?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
TfL is undertaking detailed technical work focused on options around the route to Lewisham.
TfL is working with the GLA and the London Boroughs of Southwark and Lewisham to understand how the extension could maximise the number of new homes and jobs along the route, improve passenger journeys, and improve connectivity to public transport as well as how it can be funded. Along with operational considerations, these are key factors in determining the number of stations and where they should be and, at this stage, no final decisions have been made.
Following the conclusion of this work and the completion of the forthcoming consultation on the Old Kent Road Area Action Plan being led by the London Borough of Southwark, the next public consultation on the extension could take place this winter. These consultations will provide an opportunity to comment on both the vision for the Old Kent Road and potential station location options on the proposed route from Lewisham via the Old Kent Road and New Cross Gate. Piccadilly line services stopping at Turnham Green (1) Question No: 2016/1859 Caroline Pidgeon Please confirm that despite the delay in the introduction of the Night Tube that TfL still intend to ensure that Piccadilly line services will still stop at Turnham Green from the very commencement of the Night Tube on this line.
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
Yes, Piccadilly line services will stop at Turnham Green station from the start of Night Tube on the line later this year.
Piccadilly line services stopping at Turnham Green (2) Question No: 2016/1860 Caroline Pidgeon Will you reconsider the current proposed timetable to only allow Piccadilly Line trains to stop throughout the day at Turnham Green from the mid 2020s? Will you ask TfL to review and bring forward this date?
The Mayor
Before the Piccadilly line is upgraded as part of New Tube for London by 2025, it is not possible to stop more services at Turnham Green station without increasing journey times for customers across the rest of the line. TfL remains committed to stopping all Piccadilly line services at the station once the upgrade is completed.
Customers travelling from Turnham Green station will benefit from the completion of the District line upgrade by 2022, which delivers a 24 per cent capacity increase as part of TfL's Four Lines Modernisation Programme. Demand for taxis and Private Hire Vehicles. Question No: 2016/1861 Caroline Pidgeon A constituent has asked whether TfL has undertaken any research as to whether there is a direct relationship between the demand for taxis and the demand for private hire vehicles. If so can it be published, and if not will you consider such research?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28/06/2016
TfL has commissioned new research looking at supply, demand and market sizes for taxis and private hire vehicles in London.
Analysis is underway with findings expected in late summer. TfL will publish the findings once the data has been collated and analysed.
Cass Business School (1) Question No: 2016/1862 Caroline Pidgeon Please set out the expenditure by TfL on staff training at the Cass Business School at City University London, for the years (1) 2013/14, (2) 2014/15 and (3) 2015/16.
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
This training is part of TfL's commitment to developing its senior management to ensure a customer-focussed and commercially driven organisation, committed to reducing costs, delivering for customers and leading the organisation through constant and rapid change.
Expenditure and the number of staff receiving the training in each year are as follows:
Year Expenditure No. of staff
2013/14 £161,800 34
2014/15 £460,085 88
2015/16 £523,985 160
The costs were benchmarked against equivalent programmes offered by other business schools. Cass Business School (2) Question No: 2016/1863 Caroline Pidgeon Please state how many employees of TfL have benefited from staff training services provided by the Cass Business School, at the City University London, for the years (1) 2013/14, (2) 201415, and (3) 2015/16.
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
Please see my response to MQ 2016/1862.
Publication of statistics relating to sexual offences Question No: 2016/1864 Caroline Pidgeon Will you consider routinely publishing figures for sexual offences committed by drivers of both taxis and private hire vehicles?
The Mayor
TfL is committed to publishing a range of figures in relation to Taxi and Private Hire enforcement data and this will include figures on sexual offences.
TfL and the MPS are currently working together to establish how to present this data in a consistent format and will make it publically available later in the summer. Review of junctions on Cycle Superhighways (1) Question No: 2016/1865 Caroline Pidgeon As usage of the Cycle Superhighways increases what plans does TfL have to review the balance of time given at traffic lights to drivers and to cyclists?
The Mayor
TfL is continuously monitoring all of the new cycle superhighways and making adjustments to the signal timings to achieve the right balance for all road users. All the signals along the completed section of the East-West, North-South, CS2 upgrade and CS5 inner routes are on TfL's Timing Review programme for this financial year.
TfL has a monitoring strategy in place to capture the usage of the new segregated lanes and review the operation of innovative cycle facilities, such as the two-stage right turns.
TfL will be looking to introduce new technologies that allow changes to the timings of the signals in relation to the demand of all road users. These new technologies include an adaptive SCOOT system and new cycle and pedestrian SCOOT.
Review of junctions on Cycle Superhighways (2) Question No: 2016/1866 Caroline Pidgeon Will you ensure that a review is carried out of junctions along the existing Cycle Superhighways to ensure that best practice is adopted in all future Cycle Superhighways?
The Mayor
As set out in my manifesto, I am committed to delivering more high quality Cycle Superhighways and ensuring best practice is adopted with all future routes.
TfL is monitoring the newly opened Cycle Superhighways, as well as recent upgrades at priority locations to earlier Cycle Superhighways. This work includes an assessment of how the junctions are operating and various Road Safety Audits. TfL also undertakes user satisfaction surveys and collects cycle count data to help inform how future junctions are designed.
I will ensure that lessons are learned from the work to deliver the newly opened Cycle Superhighways under the former Mayor. London Overground services on Boxing Day Question No: 2016/1867 Caroline Pidgeon What Boxing Day services are planned on London Overground this year?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28/06/2016
TfL is reviewing the potential cost and demand for Boxing Day services on London Overground, which are now possible through the new concession to Arriva as the operator of London Overground. This will be subject to staff consultation.
However, as Arriva doesn't take over services until November 2016, the earliest possible date for these services would be Boxing Day 2017.
Eden Walk development in Kingston Question No: 2016/1868 Caroline Pidgeon Will you call in the proposed planning application for the new Eden Walk development in Kingston considering its low level of affordable housing?
The Mayor
Kingston Council's planning committee has indicated that it is minded to grant planning permission for the proposal subject to any decision I may take.
As such it is not appropriate me to discuss the merits of the application as this may prejudice any future decision. Review of TfL policy of withdrawing cash payment on London buses Question No: 2016/1869 Caroline Pidgeon I have been asked by a constituent as to whether in addition to your review of London Underground ticket office closures you will also undertake a review of the full implications for passengers of the withdrawal of cash payment on London buses?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28/06/2016
The benefits of cash free operation on London's buses are clear - passengers benefit from faster boarding times and improved punctuality, while the removal of cash handling results in savings that are reinvested in the network.
At the time of launch in July 2014, less than 1 per cent of bus journeys were being paid for by cash. Of these, 91 per cent were due to lost or forgotten Oyster cards, or zero Pay As You Go balance. A number of mitigation measures were implemented to minimise the impacts on passengers and to address concerns about tourists and vulnerable passengers, including marketing and information at mainline stations in central London, and a review of procedures already in place to ensure that vulnerable passengers without a CPC, valid Oyster or other form of ticket are still able to travel.
In the months following implementation of cash free operation, TfL received a very low number of complaints (averaging six per month, less than 0.01% of all complaints) and no significant issues were raised by stakeholders. I therefore do not believe it is necessary to review this policy.
London City Airport Question No: 2016/1870 Caroline Pidgeon It has been reported that you decided to withdraw any objection to the proposed compulsory purchase of land owned by City Hall by London City Airport following new evidence submitted by London City Airport. Can you ensure that this evidence is now published?
The Mayor
All the information presented by London City Airport is public as part of the Compulsory Purchase Inquiry process and is required to be published as a matter of course.
The Airport provided both evidence and further rebuttals which sought to answer the concerns raised and informed the decision to withdraw the objection. All the information both from the Airport and the objectors can be found online at: http://lcy-cpo.persona-pi.com/inquiry- documents.
As I have previously stated, my position in respect of the planning appeal is unchanged. People sleeping rough on London Night Buses Question No: 2016/1871 Caroline Pidgeon Will you ensure regular figures are published on the number of people sleeping rough on London's Night Buses?
The Mayor
TfL does not currently have definitive figures on individuals sleeping rough on the network as it depends on reporting from bus drivers.
TfL is working with drivers and its own staff as part of its focus on rough sleeping on the network to identify what information can be collected and made available. TfL works with outreach teams and homeless charities to provide assistance to rough sleepers who seek refuge on the transport network.
UberPool Question No: 2016/1872 Caroline Pidgeon What evidence has TfL undertaken or received from the Department of Transport or any other organisation to provide an assurance that UberPool provides adequate safety for all passengers. If research has been undertaken will TfL ensure this is placed in the public domain?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
As the regulator or the capital's taxi and private hire trades, TfL seeks to ensure the best interests and safety of the public are protected. The statutory basis to allow private hire vehicle ride sharing is set out in primary legislation.
TfL has not received any evidence from the Department for Transport regarding the safety of UberPool. TfL did however obtain assurances from Uber directly, prior to the launch of UberPool, that services would be provided within the legal and regulatory framework. TfL specifically asked for, and was provided with, assurances in relation to public safety, vehicle insurance and information sharing.
I have committed to ensuring that safety standards are rigorously enforced across the black cab and private hire industries. As part of this, I have recently announced that I am quadrupling the number of taxi and private hire compliance offices to 250 by September 2017. Ride share controls on Uber (1) Question No: 2016/1873 Caroline Pidgeon What work has TfL undertaken (1) internally, and (2) jointly with the Department of Transport, to analyse the potential risks to passengers of ride sharing?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
The statutory basis to allow private hire vehicle ride sharing is set out in primary legislation. As the regulator of the capital's taxi and private hire trades, TfL seeks to ensure the best interests and safety of the public are protected.
Any provision of ride sharing must ensure that public safety is maintained. TfL sought and received assurances in relation to public safety, vehicle insurance and information sharing from Uber before UberPool was launched. I have asked TfL to monitor compliance and ensure any necessary enforcement action is taken.
TfL also considered this in its extensive consultation which covered a range of private hire matters including controls on private hire ride sharing services. Discussions have begun between the DfT and TfL to take forward the development of guidelines on ride sharing. TfL has agreed with the DfT that it will develop the initial draft guidance for ridesharing using licensed taxi and private hire vehicles, which will then be considered by the DfT and wider government.
Ride share controls on Uber (2) Question No: 2016/1874 Caroline Pidgeon What assessment if any has TfL undertaken into the feasibility of providing ride sharing and the legal commitment of all private hire vehicles to accept guide dogs?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28/06/2016
It is a legal requirement that all private hire drivers accept assistance dogs irrespective of whether a journey is made as a ride share, or an exclusive hire.
TfL will investigate any claims that a driver has refused an assistance dog and in the event of a breach take appropriate regulatory action including prosecutions where appropriate. Adoption of the London Living Wage for drivers of Private Hire Vehicles Question No: 2016/1875 Caroline Pidgeon Will you consider writing to all major private hire companies operating in London urging them to ensure they adopt the London Living Wage for all of their employees and drivers?
The Mayor
I would like to see all Londoners paid at least the London Living Wage.
As Mayor I will encourage as many London employers as possible to become Living Wage accredited.
Dial-a-Ride (1) Question No: 2016/1876 Caroline Pidgeon Please state the average cost of a Dial-a-Ride trip for 2015/16.
The Mayor
The door-to-door Dial-a-Ride service operates 365 days a year between 06:00 and 02:00. The average cost per trip for 2015/16 was £27.87.
Taxis and Private Hire Vehicles are used to support the Dial-a-Ride service. The average cost per trip for these journeys in 2015/16 was £22.47.
The Dial-a-Ride service is being reviewed to improve its quality and efficiency.
Dial-a-Ride (2) Question No: 2016/1877 Caroline Pidgeon Please state the average cost per trip for city fleet taxis operating on behalf of Dial-a-Ride for 2015/16.
The Mayor
Please see my answer to MQ 2016 /1876. MPS barclaycards (1) Question No: 2016/1878 Caroline Pidgeon How many MPS officers are currently allocated business charge cards/barclaycards? What is the current spending limit of this scheme?
The Mayor
There are 2,751 MPS officers allocated Barclaycards.
Each card has a specific spending limit which for most officers is £5,000. For a limited number of senior people, there is a significantly higher limit.
MPS barclaycards (2) Question No: 2016/1879 Caroline Pidgeon Please provide the number and value of current Barclaycard accounts with unreconciled expenditure and those with overdue expenditure.
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
As standard practice all cardholders have 30 days to submit their reconciliation form from the statement date which is the 8th of each month.
As at 27 June 2016, the value of overdue accounts from March was £5,043, April was £14,710 and May £28,000.
These are typical levels of overdue amounts and rate of reduction.
MPS barclaycards (3) Question No: 2016/1880 Caroline Pidgeon Since 2012 how many officers have faced disciplinary action over misuse of unreconciled barclaycards?
The Mayor
Eight officers have been investigated since 2012, of which four allegations were substantiated, and four were not.
Knife crime Question No: 2016/1881 (Oral) Caroline Pidgeon What immediate action will you take to tackle knife crime in London?
The Mayor
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman, and thank you for the question. Just last week I attended the funeral of Lewis Elwin. Lewis was 20 years old and was killed after being stabbed just yards from my own home. I would like to again offer my deepest condolences to Lewis’s family and friends.
This is just one of the horrific examples of the harm that knife crime causes to young lives and to whole communities. I am particularly concerned that there have been 1,662 victims of knife crime with injury aged under 25 in London in the last 12 months alone. Overall, knife crime with injury victims have increased by 16% since May 2014. That is 505 more victims. We need to do more and I am determined to act.
First, we need to send a strong signal that carrying a knife is completely unacceptable. That is why I will make tackling knife crime and serious youth violence my priorities. My Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime is working closely with the MPS on what more we can do to focus resources on tackling the city’s gangs, cracking down on shops selling knives and working on tougher community payback for those caught with knifes in addition to jail time and traditional sentencing. I am supportive of the new legislation for mandatory jail sentences for anyone caught twice in possession of a knife.
We also need to do much more on prevention alongside enforcement. The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) funds the London Gang Exit and Resettlement Service to deliver a comprehensive gang intervention and exit service across all London boroughs and a Redthread service in trauma centres to provide youth intervention services when victims of serious youth violence present at A&E, and it supports a gangs prevention programme to support young people excluded from school and at risk of becoming involved in gang-related activity. However, we can never do enough on this issue and I am working with the Commissioner and my Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime, Sophie Linden.
Finally, I just want to add that my vision is to ensure real neighbourhood policing is a priority for the MPS. Local police officers are the eyes and ears of their communities and provide vital intelligence, which helps to keep us all safe.
Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: Thank you for that extensive answer. We not only had the recent funeral you attended; we had an 18-year-old stabbed to death in Battersea only yesterday afternoon. High levels of knife crime have gone up since 2010.
I have some very specific asks of you today. As you have already said, it is really important that we do stuff in schools. I have spoken to various strategies and schools are not spending their budgets on knife crime education programmes. They think that there is a stigma attached. Will you ask MOPAC to fund and develop a knife crime education programme, working with charities, to be rolled out to every school in London so that we do not have this issue of a stigma? Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Tackling knife crime and other forms of serious violence is clearly an issue and I want to make prevention programmes more effective and to work closely with local authorities, schools and youth services to develop anti-gang strategies. I want to see more Safer Schools officers in schools. That will form part of my Police and Crime Plan ‑‑
Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: You will look to help fund programmes?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): ‑‑ which will be consulted on widely later this year. I hope, Chairman, that schools will contribute to this important conversation.
Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: OK. I will take that as a sort of yes there. Rolling out data- sharing with A&E departments, such as the Cardiff Model, has been proven to reduce violent crime by 42%. Time and time again I pressed the previous Mayor on this and still a third of A&Es in London are not signed up to this. What is your timescale to ensure all A&Es share anonymised data with the police to help reduce knife crime on our streets?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I will ensure that all hospitals record and share knife wound data as they do for gunshot wounds for the reasons that have been said and so that we know the true scale of the problem.
Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: What is the timescale for that, though?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Through the Home Office Police Innovation Fund, MOPAC is funding and leading a 24-month programme to implement the Cardiff Model in London and to ensure that each hospital in London shares anonymised data with community safety partnerships, including the police, regarding A&E admissions due to violent crime. I understand that 20 of the 29 hospital trusts are now sharing data and my Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime will be working with the remaining nine.
Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: Within two years you expect all of them to be on board, which is good. That is welcome. It has taken the previous eight years with the last Mayor.
MOPAC, as you have already said, funds Redthread, which places youth workers in major trauma centres, and it also funds Oasis Youth [Support], which has youth workers at St Thomas’ A&E. These youth workers really make contact with young people when they are admitted to hospital with knife-related injuries a vital teachable moment and help them to turn their lives around and end the cycle of violence. Will you consider extending this funding to ensure we have dedicated youth workers in every A&E in London?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Mr Chairman, I have already said that I have a 24-month programme. Let us wait until the programme ends and we will ‑‑
Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: No, that was about sharing anonymised data, not about youth workers in every A&E. Would you perhaps join me and visit King’s [College] Hospital to see first-hand the work of Redthread in terms of turning young people away from knife crime and the intervention work it does?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I have already said that the Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime is working on a Police and Crime Plan, which will be published this autumn. If the Assembly Member wants to contribute to the consultation, she is welcome to do so. I am sure she is aware of how to reach the Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime to discuss that.
Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: I hope you will be supportive of youth workers. Have you raised with the Government the issue of speeding up a ban on the sale of zombie and long-bladed knives, which have no practical purpose other than the pursuit of violence?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): There are lots of issues that I raise regularly with the Government, including the issue of knife sales. Also, one of the key things is to make sure that those shops that are selling knives are prosecuted and action is taken.
Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM: Thank you very much.
Cardiff Model Update Question No: 2016/1882 Caroline Pidgeon Whilst campaigning last year you stated that you think hospitals should share records of every stabbing with police in a bid to reduce violent crime. Further to MQ 2016/0571please can you confirm or update the timescale for data sharing being implemented in all of London's hospital trusts.
The Mayor
The Cardiff model and work of the London Information Sharing to Tackle Violence (ISTV) programme is focused on obtaining anonymised data regarding assaults (including stabbings) from Emergency Departments to share with Community Safety Partners, which include the police, with a view to reducing violent crime.
Since the start of the London Programme in 2015, there has been a 400% increase (from 4 to 20) in the number of Type 1 Emergency Departments sharing anonymised data.
The ISTV programme is on track for all remaining Emergency Departments to commence data sharing by the end of September. Meetings are arranged with the remaining hospitals and support will be provided to ensure data sharing commences promptly.
It remains my firm intention to reduce violent crime in our capital and I believe that effective data sharing is important to achieving that. The development of my Police and Crime plan will present the opportunity to consult with partners, including those from the health and justice sectors to identify the best way of achieving that end. Operation Attrition Question No: 2016/1883 Caroline Pidgeon How is the success of Operation Attrition in Camden and Islington going to be measured? If successful will this campaign be rolled out across all London boroughs?
The Mayor
Operation Attrition was set up in response to a rise in bike and moped enabled theft in Camden and Islington. Its success is measured through the reduction of crime and victims; and improved education and diversion of offenders. A renewed advertising campaign is currently running to encourage members of the public to keep their mobile phones safe.
Camden and Islington boroughs have seen over five months (to end of May 2016) of consistent reduction in the overall levels of theft person, a significant amount of which has been driven by a reduction in the number of offences carried out using mopeds and bicycles - the primary focus of Op Attrition - as well as sustained reduction of other crime types. This reduction has been supported by improved offender management and investigation, and intelligence led proactive deployments.
The operation is available for roll out in other areas of London if required, although it has been taliored to solve a particular problem idenitified in these two boroughs.
Cable Car - Breakdown of fares sold Question No: 2016/1884 1 Attachments Caroline Pidgeon Please provide a breakdown of the number of tickets sold for the Emirates Air Line by fare type (i.e. cash fare, discounted fare, the 'Emirate Air Line Experience' combined pass, and Multi Journey Boarding Pass etc.) and ticket type (i.e. Adult, Child). Please provide this information for 2014/15, and separately 2015/16.
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
The number of tickets by fare type and the equivalent number of single journeys to which this translates (i.e. one return ticket is the equivalent of two journeys) for 2014/15 and 2015/16, can be found in Appendix D. Reviewing the Earl's Court Masterplan Question No: 2016/1885 Caroline Pidgeon Will you carry out your promised review of the Earl's Court Masterplan as a matter of urgency given the serious public health concerns expressed by local residents and the threat of demolition facing the West Kensington and Gibbs Green estates and the Lillie Bridge depot?
The Mayor
The planning application for the Earls Court Masterplan was submitted in October 2011, and approved by Kensington & Chelsea Council and Hammersmith & Fulham Council in 2013. Both applications were referred to the previous Mayor, who concluded that he was content with the decisions.
Subsequently, Hammersmith & Fulham Council adopted its Development Management Local Plan and decided to re-determine the application, again resolving to grant consent and again referring the application back to the previous Mayor. In September 2013, the previous Mayor again concluded he was content with the decision. The existing Masterplan therefore has a consent that cannot be revoked.
However, any revision to the Masterplan, or other planning applications associated with the Masterplan, will be required to be referred to me at which point I will review its content as part of my statutory planning function.
Earl's Court - West Kensington and Gibbs Green Question No: 2016/1886 Caroline Pidgeon Will you write to the government in order to support the request made by West Kensington and Gibbs Green residents for a transfer of ownership of their two estates from the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham to a community owned landlord?
The Mayor
My officers are working closely with Hammersmith & Fulham Council which is committed to achieving the best regeneration outcome for residents of the estates.
At present I consider this will best be achieved by the council remaining as landlord. Although ultimately the decision on this issue rests with the Secretary of State. Earl's Court - engaging with residents and business Question No: 2016/1887 Caroline Pidgeon Will you agree to visit residents and business owners in Earl's Court and West Kensington to hear first-hand about their own plans for regeneration which include an alternative to demolition for the West Kensington and Gibbs Green estates?
The Mayor
Given my statutory planning role as Mayor and the potential for the current scheme to be revised or an alternative scheme to be referred to me, it is not appropriate for me to discuss the merits of a potential application to avoid prejudicing any decision.
However, I will suggest that my Deputy Mayor for Housing visits residents and business owners as you suggest.
Audit of London's housing crisis Question No: 2016/1888 Caroline Pidgeon Will you publish the findings of the "urgent audit" you asked officials to carry out into City Hall's preparedness to tackle London's housing crisis?
The Mayor
The results of the audit were published in my press releases of 16 and 31 May.
Disposal of GLA land and property Question No: 2016/1889 Caroline Pidgeon Further to your commitment to "explore the full range of options available to maximise best value from publically owned land in London" (MQ2016/1381), how will you ensure that wider Mayoral priorities - such as the need for additional affordable homes - are taken into account when disposing of GLA owned land? Are you prepared to dispose of GLA land or property at less than market value to reflect the social value of particular uses (e.g. affordable housing, schools)?
The Mayor
When developing the strategy for land available for disposal, consideration is given as to how the land can best be used for the benefit Londoners. This will include a review against all Mayoral priorities. Protecting London's Green Belt Question No: 2016/1890 Caroline Pidgeon How seriously should Londoners take your pledge to oppose building on the Green Belt, given your subsequent assertion that you will consider all applications for development on the Green Belt with an open mind and may therefore support building on the Green Belt in some circumstances?
The Mayor
My manifesto made clear that I will protect the Green Belt and open spaces including Metropolitan Open Land. This position and the protection already provided by national policy will be the basis for any review of the London Plan on this issue.
TfL fares freeze Question No: 2016/1891 Caroline Pidgeon How do you account for the different estimates of the cost of funding your TfL fares freeze over the next four years? Please include a full breakdown of the assumptions behind the £1.9 billion figure reported to the London Assembly by the Commissioner of Transport for London on 10 February 2016, and separately the £640 million figure stated in your most recent report to the Assembly.
The Mayor
My manifesto commitment was to freeze all TfL fares for four years, funded from cost reduction at TfL identified in a root-and-branch review of the organisation. I have frozen all the fares within my control and I am urging the DfT and Train Operating Companies to do the same or to transfer services to me.
The change in the TfL estimates is due to two main factors. First, the period covered is four years rather than the five-year period covered by the previous Mayor's Business Plan. Second, only those fares that I have the power to freeze have been included.
The attached table explains the changes in the estimates further. These can, however, only ever be estimates. The actual values will be determined by the actual path of a range of variables including inflation and ridership.
Cumulative Change Commentary cost (£m) (£m) Early 2015: Original estimate based on the then forecasts in the five-year 2014 Business Plan for RPI (1.9 per cent for July 2015, 1,910 - 3.5 per cent thereafter) and covering all fares, including Travelcards Inflation forecast for July 2015 reduced to 1.3 per cent from 1.9 1,846 -64 per cent Slight increase in traffic forecast for Tube and rail while bus 1,874 +28 patronage lower; actual inflation for July 2015 at one per cent Decrease in inflation assumption for July 2016 to 1.9 per cent 1,766 -108 from 3.5 per cent and changes in traffic forecasts Freezing only TfL fares 1,100 -666 Four years rather than five 640 -460
Air quality near schools Question No: 2016/1892 Caroline Pidgeon Following your recent visit to Sir John Cass's Foundation Primary School in Aldgate - during which you witnessed first-hand the dangerous levels of air pollution around London's schools - will you look at strengthening the air quality provisions in the London Plan to actively discourage new schools, care homes or health clinics being located near existing air pollution hotspots?
The Mayor
Yes. Schools, Care Homes and health clinics house some of the most vulnerable members of our society, as such special care needs to be taken to make sure they are located in the most suitable locations.
I will ensure that the new London Plan reflects the best information about air pollution in London and works with the London boroughs to make sure that the most sensitive developments are only allowed in suitable areas, while I continue to work to improve air quality for all Londoners.
Smog alerts - TfL website Question No: 2016/1893 Caroline Pidgeon Will you examine whether air quality information and health advice could be provided on Transport for London's website during high pollution episodes in London?
The Mayor
Air pollution and smog are monitored at a national level by the Met Office. Air quality information is featured on the GLA website, with side bar alerts on medium and high pollution days, as well as on the Met Office and Defra's UK-AIR websites.
I want to ensure that information and guidance on air quality in London is made as widely available to the public as is possible so I have asked TfL to look into doing as you suggest. Berwick Street market Question No: 2016/1894 Caroline Pidgeon How do you respond to Westminster City Council's decision to hand over control of Berwick Street market to a private operator? What if any plans do you have to support council-run street markets?
The Mayor
The GLA has not been involved in the operator decision at Berwick Street Market.
I fully recognise the importance of Markets and their role in London as places of employment, consumption and leisure. They provide variety and diversity, history and character, and generate footfall on high streets and in town centres. In terms of the plans to support council- run street Markets, officers have recently commissioned a new study to help us better understand the pan-london make up of street and indoor markets. The study will provide a comprehensive map of all London Markets and assess the economic and social value that markets bring. In addition the study will make recommendations and inform future strategic decisions to help the sector in London thrive and grow.
Celebrating and supporting Markets already sits within the GLA's overarching High Streets agenda, which is currently investing over £175 million into more than 70 high streets across London.
In at least 29 of these places officers are providing direct support to existing and new, outdoor and indoor, regular and occasional markets.
In acknowledgment that London needs a strategic forum to bring together a diffuse Markets sector we are in the process of working up a proposal for a London's Markets Board. The purpose of the Board will be to provide strategic oversight and guidance, support for businesses, delivery of improvements - including activities and at a policy level and promote and lobby on behalf of the sector.
Modular Homes Question No: 2016/1895 Caroline Pidgeon What is your assessment of the contribution that so-called modular homes - low-cost units constructed off-site using the latest building technologies and techniques - could make to increasing London's housing supply?
The Mayor
Please see my response to Oral MQ 2016/2011. GLA Transparency (1) Question No: 2016/1896 Caroline Pidgeon Further to the revelation that your predecessor as Mayor of London apparently suppressed the publication of a report linking air pollution and deprived schools, will you carry out a full audit of the GLA to establish how many other reports were commissioned, but not published, by Boris Johnson.
The Mayor
I am currently in the process of clearing up the mess left by my predecessor and will report back on any areas of concern which I feel are in the public interest.
GLA Transparency (2) Question No: 2016/1897 1 Attachments Caroline Pidgeon Further to the revelation that your predecessor as Mayor of London undertook a 24-hour taxpayer-funded trip to San Francisco, along with various GLA and TfL officers, to raise private sponsorship for the Garden Bridge, will you investigate how many other taxpayer-funded trips were made by Boris Johnson and/or his officials and which were not declared in his official report to the Assembly?
The Mayor
I too was surprised to discover the details of this trip and am fully committed to delivering a transparent administration during my term of office.
Whilst trips by officials would not necessarily have been reported in the Mayor's Report to the Assembly (eg officials travelling to conferences etc), I agree that all of the Mayor's trips should have been fully reported, which in turn I commit to doing in the future.
In light of this please find attached as Appendix A a list of all the trips undertaken by Boris Johnson whilst he was the Mayor, with the corresponding foreign travel approval number for your reference. GLA Transparency (3) Question No: 2016/1898 Caroline Pidgeon Will you commit to publish all the reports you commission as Mayor of London and ensure that all taxpayer-funded trips you and/or your officials undertake are reported to the London Assembly?
The Mayor
I agree that all of the Mayor's trips should have been fully reported, which in turn I commit to doing in the future.
However, I cannot commit to publishing all the reports I commission in future. As I hope you understand, some of these reports may contain information that is particularly sensitive. For example, my London Preparedness Review, led by Lord Toby Harris, may generate findings which cannot be fully made public. But it is my aim to be open and transparent by publishing as many reports as I can. Restructuring of TfL Question No: 2016/1899 Caroline Pidgeon Has TfL used any consultants since July 2015 to advise the Commissioner on the restructuring of the organisation and if so please list the consultants that have been used and how much has been spent to date on each consultancy.
The Mayor
TfL engaged the services of strategic consultants, Boston Consulting Group (BCG), in December 2015 to support the root and branch review of TfL.
The objectives of the root and branch review are to deliver my pledge to freeze TfL fares, to unlock extensive cost reductions, drive value engineering throughout the organisation, and create a more efficient and effective organisation. This will ensure that London can continue to move, work and grow, against a backdrop of a £2.8bn reduction in TfL’s Government grant funding.
External consultants are able to fulfil a number of roles that are critical to the programme’s success, including: providing insight into what comparable organisations are doing under similar circumstances; benchmarking TfL's performance against best-in-class organisations; and best practice approaches to delivering significant cost savings across the board. To date, £4.8m has been spent on BCG.
TfL estimates that BCG’s work has already saved the organisation around £43m in 2016/17 from stopping, de-scoping or deferring low-impact technology projects (which is expected to deliver around £120m in savings over the next five years); around £10m through initial improvements to commercial contracts; and, around £3m in contract savings through re-tendering, with a further £3m to be delivered by the end of 2016. Very significant financial savings will follow in future years.
Terrorism Question No: 2016/1917 (Oral) 1 Supplementary Questions 2 Commitments Peter Whittle In the light of the terrible shootings in Orlando, can the Mayor describe what, if any, measures he intends to put into place in London in order to protect the capital's gay community from a similar attack?
The Mayor
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman, and thank you, Assembly Member Whittle. The hideous and cowardly act of terror we saw in Orlando was a brutal attack on lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people and an assault on everyone who holds dear our freedoms and our values. Let us be clear: we cannot be complacent, but neither must we allow this or any other similar atrocity to change the way Londoners go about their daily lives or dent their confidence to be who they are in our great city. This devastating act was of maximum severity and is something that I take incredibly seriously. As outlined in my update to the Assembly, I attended the Old Compton Street vigil held on the day following the atrocity and this reinforced the importance of Londoners remaining united against hate to ensure that this cowardly attack does not frighten anyway away from being who they are. I am proud to be Mayor of a city where a large majority of people from all communities, faiths and backgrounds do not simply tolerate each other but respect, embrace and celebrate their differences.
I will be proud to march at this year’s Pride in London event on Saturday and I have personally approved the 52 sets of lights being changed along the Pride route as a sign of how important this is for London. The Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) is upping security for the event with an uplift of officers in attendance and is also engaging with venues, organisers and security companies to ensure there is maximum safety at the event. There are two parts to this. One is protecting against extremism and terrorist actions and the other is ensuring that hate crime is not tolerated.
I have announced the launch of an independent review to understand how London would cope with a terrorist attack such as that in Orlando and the result of this is due later this summer. While in many ways London is a tolerant and open city, we need to be clear to those who perpetrate this sort of crime that we will not tolerate it. I have committed to making tackling hate crime a priority for the police. Everyone has a part to play and we need to work together to ensure that London continues to shine out as a global beacon of tolerance, acceptance and respect in the decades ahead.
Peter Whittle AM: Thank you very much for those comments, Mr Mayor, and also thank you for going to Old Compton Street and showing your support.
I quite understand when you say that we should not allow this to change the way that we go about our lives, but I would like you to comment on my feeling that in fact in the gay community there has been quite a number of attacks. It is not just in Florida but there were two in Seattle. One club was burned down and two LGBT people were killed on another occasion. Of course, we have seen around the world that gay men have been a particular target when it comes to the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).
Therefore, I am not pleading or asking for special treatment, but I do feel that surely you could consider that maybe at least on a temporary level there is further security in areas where gay men meet, for example, in London, in Soho or Vauxhall. Have you put in some form of measure, however temporary? Given that this Saturday is Pride, would not people feel much safer if they knew that, for example, there were some more armed officers in that area?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. For reasons that I hope the Member will appreciate, I cannot go into detail about what the operational plans are. The obvious reason is that the bad guys will know what the police are planning.
However, I will just reassure him [Assembly Member Whittle] and the LGBT community here in London that the MPS has been working extremely hard - and rightly so - since the Orlando attack not simply to keep us safe but to reassure the LGBT community that they have been visiting various venues and organisations, giving briefings and addressing the concerns that Londoners have.
My message to him and to Londoners is what we can say publicly, which is quite clear. The threat level has not changed in London from before the tragic attack in Orlando, but all people should remain vigilant, be aware of their personal surroundings, safeguard personal possessions and report anything suspicious.
The key thing I would say is this: please do not change your plans; continue to attend and enjoy Pride. What I am able to say is that there will be an additional 150 officers on duty in full uniform taking part in the parade itself and extra uniformed officers will be assigned to provide greater visibility and offer further reassurance. I hope you will appreciate why I simply cannot go into operational details.
Peter Whittle AM: I totally understand, Mr Mayor, why you cannot. Could I ask you, therefore, maybe - it is a genuine question - to convey this to the Commissioner [of Police of the Metropolis]: in fact, if you go to bars in, for example, the West End, there is a fair amount of security. I go there on a regular basis. Unlike in Orlando, the fact of the matter is that you could easily go in with a suicide belt on. Sometimes I wonder that it has not actually happened already and I am hugely thankful that it has not. Can you convey that in fact that is also something that could easily have been the case in Orlando - actually, it might not have been guns; it might have been someone with a suicide vest - and that, basically, security at bars in Soho and Vauxhall must take this into consideration? Will you convey that?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Of course I will, but can I also suggest, Chairman, through you, to the Assembly Member, I will organise for you to meet my Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime so that she is also aware of your genuine concerns and any ideas you might have as well.
Peter Whittle AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor, for that.
Congestion on the Underground Question No: 2016/1918 (Oral) David Kurten In the light of the comments of Miles Ashley, London Underground's programme director for construction, that the capital's soaring population will make parts of the system 'inoperable' with 15 years, will the Mayor make the case to government that migration into the city must be eased if its infrastructure is to remain effective?
The Mayor
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. Let us be clear upfront: without migration London would not be the city it is today. My view is that the lack of planning for growth is the problem, not growth per se. The previous Mayor dragged his feet on having the pipeline of projects that London needs such as a new river crossing as he cancelled the Thames Gateway Bridge and focused instead on failed projects such as the Cable Car and new Routemasters.
London’s growth, driven by its economic success, means the city’s population is expected to grow from 8.6 million now to 10 million by 2030 with record numbers of people using the Tube. There were over 1.3 billion passenger journeys made last year. TfL already has an investment programme in place to ensure the Tube is equipped to manage this growth. I will aim to deliver that programme and further improvements to the overall transport network in London.
Even though I am freezing TfL fares for four years, we intend to invest £1.3 billion a year in London Underground’s capital programme with major station modernisation, new trains and signalling, line extensions and a huge programme of asset renewal. The four line Tube modernisation programme will deliver fast, more frequent and more reliable journeys for millions of passengers. The New Tube for London programme will transform travel on the Piccadilly, Waterloo & City, Bakerloo and Central lines from the early 2020s. The TfL-run Elizabeth Line, which opens in 2018, will carry more than 500,000 customers a day. I am delighted that I have already been able to confirm the launch of Night Tube services, which start running on Central and Victoria lines on 9 August.
However, we do need to do more to ensure London’s growth and economic success is managed and that is why we need to get on with Crossrail 2 as soon as possible. We need to extend the Bakerloo line south and deliver river crossings in the east of London and plan the next major infrastructure projects for the long term. We also need to encourage modal shift and for people to use other forms of public transport to relieve capacity of the network. That is why I will invest to make it easier to cycle and walk in London.
David Kurten AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor, for your answer and thank you for all the projects that you are talking about that you think will increase capacity. I am sure they will all increase capacity to some extent on the Tube network. With the population projected to be 10 million in 2030 and 12 million perhaps by 2050, do you think that all these projects will be enough to reduce the congestion that we already have on the Underground?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): We have to. I want London to be the greatest city in the world and that means modal shift is very important. We want people to be cycling, to be walking. We want the next generation of buses to be electric. That is really important. We have already talked about congestion on the roads because of utility works and roadworks and we want to address these problems.
David Kurten AM: TfL’s own figures that I have here say that cycling journeys in 2011 were 500,000 a day and in 20 years there will be a threefold increase in cycle journeys, which is fantastic, but those journeys will only be 5% of the total journeys that people take. The number of passenger journeys on the underground is expected to go up from 1.3 billion this year to 1.7 billion in ten years’ time and that is 40 million extra journeys per year on the underground.
Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): What about a question?
David Kurten AM: Yes, I am just getting to that. Crossrail will be able to carry 200 million extra people a year. Do you accept then that we will need the equivalent of an extra Crossrail every five years? That is just not deliverable.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): In the time it has taken us to conceive of Crossrail and finally build it, Paris has built five and so I do not accept that you cannot have major infrastructure projects one after the other. We have to be ambitious and we should be getting on with Crossrail 2 now. We should have Crossrail 3 on all bits of London. We have to extend the tram and we have to make sure we extend the Bakerloo line south. We have to be thinking about making sure that when it comes to the London Plan we do not have a concentration of jobs in zone 1. We need to change directions of travel - think about Croydon, a great place for growth, and other parts of outer London - and so people’s direction of travel will change as well. We have to think about where people live, where people work, where people play and where people study and make sure there is better connectivity.
David Kurten AM: Is you plan then to increase and speed up the process of building more Crossrails? Is it part of your plan to ease the congestion to build Crossrail 2 more quickly, build Crossrail 3 and then have an orbital Crossrail? Is that part of your plan in your vision?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): My ambition is to carry on being ambitious about our city, which means infrastructure is really important. If you look at the best cities in the world, they invest in infrastructure. What we need to do is make sure there is consensus so that if - in my view, God forbid - I lose the next election, the next Mayor has consensus because it is consensus that carries on with the projects.
When you speak to the Chancellor [The Rt Honourable George Osborne MP, Chancellor of the Exchequer], he will tell you that when he became the Chancellor in 2010 he was given the option to cancel Crossrail and the option to cancel a number of infrastructure projects. He did not do so, which is to his credit. We cannot have the situation where because one party has a plan and they lose the election, the plan is cancelled. European countries and cities do not do that we should not do that, either.
Housing Question No: 2016/1919 David Kurten In my view, the Mayor has backpedalled on statements in his campaign manifesto implying that he will build 80,000 new homes per year. How is he going to match supply and demand for housing in London given the ever increasing growth of population in the city?
The Mayor
My Manifesto said London needs more than 50,000 new homes a year which I am committed to delivering, including substantially more affordable homes.
Evidence being prepared to support the full review of the London Plan will help to establish the future balance between housing need and supply, Zero emissions black cabs and PHVs Question No: 2016/1920 David Kurten Under current plans all new licensed taxis must be zero emissions capable by 2018, but the same rules will only apply to PHVs from January 2023. As this gives PHVs a 5 year competitive advantage, does the Mayor have any plans to change the dates so the rules on zero emissions capability for licensed taxis and PHVs will be implemented together?
The Mayor
I was elected on a mandate to improve air quality in London. In my first week in office I announced a policy consultation on a major package of measures to tackle air pollution which I have now set out for consultation.
TfL and the GLA are working together to review the current arrangements for the Ultra-Low Emission Zone to deliver the greatest air quality benefits. This will include looking at all aspects of the currently proposed arrangements for taxis and PHVs.
Fares Freeze Promise Question No: 2016/1922 David Kurten Does the Mayor think that he made it abundantly clear to all voters that season tickets and Oyster pay as you go caps were not included in his promise that 'Londoners will not pay a penny more for their travel in 2020?'
The Mayor
Yes. I was the only candidate who pledged to freeze TfL fares and my commitment is clear in my manifesto. I have scrapped the planned 17 per cent hike in TfL fares after they went up 42 per cent since 2008. Promise made, promise delivered.
A bus fare today is £1.50 and it will be the same in 2020 and, from September, a second bus journey within an hour will be free. The daily cap for the buses and trams is £4.50 today and will be the same in 2020.
I have frozen all fares within my power and I am urging the DfT and Train Operating Companies to do the same or to let me run their services instead. Al Quds Parade Question No: 2016/1923 Peter Whittle Each year London sees the Al Quds parade march to the US Embassy. In past years Hezbollah battle flags have allegedly been flown and speeches given which have allegedly featured extremist rhetoric about Israel and the West. In line with the Mayor's commitment to make London a more tolerant and inclusive city, can he confirm that this year's parade will be properly policed in terms of numbers, and that any breaches of the Terrorism and Race Relations Acts, which in my view have been ignored in the past, will be dealt with in accordance with the law?
The Mayor
I made it clear in my manifesto that I take all offences relating to terrorism and hate crime incredibly seriously.
While the detail of operations sits with the Police, I am in constant communication with the Commissioner on these matters and I know from my discussions him that such demonstrations are taken very seriously and breaches of the law are dealt with accordingly.
However, numbers of officers and deployment in relation to the policing of demonstrations is an operational matter. London Water Plan Question No: 2016/1924 David Kurten The current London Water Plan indicates that in a water supply emergency, the Beckton desalinator will be turned on and we will import water on a boat from Norway. Does the Mayor have any improvement on these plans?
The Mayor
The issue of a potential drought in London is serious concern, and whilst it may be far from our minds following the relatively wet recent weather, London actually has a significant risk of drought.
This risk is generally increasing as our population increases and the implications of the main climate change predictions further exacerbate the risks.
Managing London's water supplies is the role of 4 separate water companies, depending where in London you live - the largest supplier being Thames Water. These companies have water resource management plans in place and have a series of targets and actions relating to managing water supplies and drought situations.
I am keen that as Londoner's we use water more efficiently, have more water meters and reduce leakage rates. The water companies have a range of measures to increase supplies such as groundwater recharge, water transfer to other companies and the use of the Beckton Desalination plant. However, with the pressure that water is under not just in London but in south east England, we are going to need new water resources. Thames Water is investigating options for a significant new water resource and will make a case to develop new resources to be available in the mid to late 2020s.
I am supportive of the aim of this work, but I wish to reserve judgement on any preferred option for new resources until I have seen the research that is being undertaken, suffice to say, I do not see shipping water from Norway as a sustainable or desirable option.
Compensation for diesel conversions Question No: 2016/1925 David Kurten If the Mayor implements new taxes on diesel vehicles, will he also consider donating a sum of money such as £500.00 to each vehicle registered to an address within London that converts to hybrid electric motorisation?
The Mayor
I asked TfL to start work on the costs and challenges of implementing a diesel scrappage scheme as part of a wider national scheme delivered by the Government. Development in Wimbledon Question No: 2016/1926 David Kurten The future development of Wimbledon is an important issue for local residents. Does the Mayor support the return of AFC Wimbledon to Plough Lane or does he support the Greyhound track being knocked down and used for affordable homes.
The Mayor
As you will be aware the application has been called-in. This means that I am the Local Planning Authority for this application and as such it is not appropriate for me to discuss the merits of the application so that I do not prejudice any future decision.
Lodge Avenue flyover (1) Question No: 2016/1927 David Kurten At a recent regeneration meeting with the Barking and Dagenham Chamber of Commerce, two council officers stated that a recent TfL inspection found that the Lodge Avenue flyover on the A13 in Barking was in such bad condition that it is in danger of collapse. Could the Mayor confirm the findings of this TfL inspection?
The Mayor
It is not true that the flyover is in danger of collapse. The Lodge Avenue flyover is inspected regularly to ensure that it remains in a safe condition. As part of the routine maintenance regime, a recent inspection identified the need for several of the abutment bearings to be replaced. This work was completed over three weekend closures in March and April this year, along with other maintenance works needed to keep the existing flyover operational until its planned replacement by 2024.
Lodge Avenue flyover (2) Question No: 2016/1928 David Kurten What action is being planned to make the Lodge Avenue flyover safe and when?
The Mayor
Lodge Avenue flyover will continue to be monitored and maintained as part of its routine management procedure to ensure that it remains in a safe condition up until its planned replacement.
The flyover is currently operated and maintained by Road Management Services Ltd (RMS) under the 30 year A13 Design, Build, Finance and Operate contract which was awarded in 2000. Under the terms of the contract RMS have an obligation to replace Lodge Avenue flyover by 2024. Housing development on Barking & Dagenham College green belt land (1) Question No: 2016/1929 Peter Whittle Barking & Dagenham College has requested planning permission to build 125 homes on green belt land immediately next to the Eastbrookend Country Park and local councillors have said that the matter is still resting with the London Mayor's office. Could the Mayor confirm that his office will turn down this application and stand by his election promise to protect the green belt?
The Mayor
The former Mayor made initial representations on this application in October 2015, identifying the proposed inappropriate development on Green Belt as a key concern.
If Barking and Dagenham Council resolves to approve this application, it must refer the case to me for a final decision. A Borough Committee date has yet to be fixed to determine this application. I am unable to comment on this scheme as it would prejudice my future decision making.
Housing development on Barking & Dagenham College green belt land (2) Question No: 2016/1930 Peter Whittle When will a decision be made about planning application 15/00887 from Barking & Dagenham College and an announcement made to give the people of Dagenham the peace of mind they require?
The Mayor
The former Mayor made initial representations on this application in October 2015, identifying the proposed inappropriate development on Green Belt as a key concern.
If Barking and Dagenham Council resolves to approve this application, it must refer the case to me for a final decision. A Borough Committee date has yet to be fixed to determine this application.
My decision will be published on the GLA website in the usual way. Carbon Dioxide Question No: 2016/1931 David Kurten Does the Mayor believe that carbon dioxide is a pollutant?
The Mayor
Yes.
Carbon Dioxide Question No: 2016/1932 David Kurten Does the Mayor understand that further increases in carbon dioxide levels will not significantly increase average global temperatures due to near saturation absorption by CO2 in the 13 – 17 µm band of the infra-red spectrum?
The Mayor
This is not the consensus view of experts.
For more information regarding the scientific consensus on climate change please read the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) publications: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/.
Carbon Dioxide Question No: 2016/1933 David Kurten Does the Mayor understand that water vapour is a far more significant absorber of infra-red radiation than carbon dioxide, and that trying to reduce carbon dioxide levels is a red herring in comparison to other far more important environmental problems such as SO2 NOx, tropospheric ozone and carbon particulate levels?
The Mayor
Please see the response to MQ 2016/ 1932.
Energy for Londoners Question No: 2016/1934 (Oral) 1 Commitments Caroline Russell Will your 'Energy for Londoners' be a fully licensed municipal energy company that is able to sell electricity to residents and businesses?
The Mayor Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Assembly Member Russell. “Energy for Londoners” is an umbrella term that will cover all of my programmes and initiatives on energy and fuel poverty. It will provide a greater focus and capacity for my programmes in this area and give Londoners a better, more competitive choice of energy supplier, one that understands their needs and has fairer tariffs for all of its customers. Within this, it is my aim to revitalise City Hall’s green energy, energy saving and carbon reduction efforts. The previous Mayor inherited a city that was world-class in these areas, but he has handed over to me a record that is mediocre at best.
I committed to a not-for-profit energy company in my manifesto and my officers are taking this forward as part of the early work of Energy for Londoners. It is potentially a significant undertaking and so rigorous feasibility and business modelling will be carried out to determine the most appropriate structure and functions of the company in order to achieve the overarching objectives of reducing carbon dioxide emissions and alleviating fuel poverty in London. There has been considerable innovation in the area with the establishment of Robin Hood Energy in Nottingham, Bristol Energy and Our Power in Scotland. These are exciting times and I want London on behalf of Londoners to be in on the action. We are working closely with these organisations to benefit from their experience. If we get this right, not only can we achieve a cleaner, greener city, but we can lower Londoners’ energy bills, too, helping the 326,000 households that are in fuel poverty as well as many others who struggle to pay their energy bills.
Caroline Russell AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor. Just to be absolutely clear, are you talking about a fully licensed municipal energy company - like the “big six” or a smaller energy company like Good Energy - that will sell electricity directly to the public and businesses or are you talking about encouraging more small suppliers and providing them with a market, for instance, to sell their energy to TfL? Is it a fully licensed company that you are talking about that can sell energy to Londoners?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): That is the idea, Chairman. The reason I deliberately referred to what is happening in Nottingham, Bristol, Scotland and other parts of the country is because there are lessons we can learn. Some of the work the officers are doing is around feasibility and learning the lessons because we do not want to reinvent the wheel and it is important that we learn the lessons.
However, that is not the limit of our ambition. We also want Energy for Londoners to deliver a wide range of energy and fuel poverty programmes and projects, including energy efficient building retrofits, solar deployment, fuel poverty alleviation, demand-side reduction, smart metering rollout support and developing funding and finance initiatives.
Caroline Russell AM: If this is what it really seems like, there are going to be an awful lot of people in London who will be very pleased to hear that. Do you have a timeline for reporting back on what officers find out from what has been happening in Bristol and Nottingham?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am happy, Chairman, to keep the Assembly Member updated on progress because I am sure she has ideas that can feed into this as well.
Caroline Russell AM: Thank you very much. Can I also draw your attention to a feasibility report that the Green Group worked on last December? It has been through a lot of the detail about how such a fully licensed energy company would function, the way that it would sell electricity directly to London residents, businesses, schools and hospitals, provide cost- competitive energy - unlike the “big six”, which rip people off - and use the revenue generated from the sale of energy to install solar panels on the TfL estate and homes that the Mayor builds, and also help Londoners with the energy-efficiency measures that will tackle fuel poverty. Can I ask that you have a look at the details in there?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I would be very happy, Chairman, to receive the work and get my team to look at it.
Caroline Russell AM: That is great. Then, if this is going to be an energy company for all Londoners, will you make sure that any governance arrangements include a diverse group of Londoners and that particularly groups that are working in community energy can be involved in the governance arrangements?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Let us wait and see what the officers come back with, Chairman, but I hear what the Assembly Member says.
Caroline Russell AM: Thank you.
First dibs for Londoners Question No: 2016/1935 (Oral) 1 Supplementary Questions Sian Berry Will you outline how you will meet your manifesto pledge "to give 'first dibs' to first-time buyers and local tenants" in new developments
The Mayor
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. I want to make sure that Londoners get the benefit of as many of the new homes we build as possible. The problem now is that too many Londoners feel they are not benefiting from new homes built in the capital, particularly where new homes are bought as gold‑brick investments and left empty. It is clear that these homes are not helping any Londoners’ housing situations. The example of the tower at St George Wharf hit the headlines recently. This tower contains 240 apartments, of which 184 have no one registered to vote, of which over 130 are foreign‑owned and of which none are affordable. This is clearly at the extreme, but it is clear we need to make sure Londoners benefit from more of the new homes we build.
The previous Mayor appeared to recognise that Londoners have been missing out on the opportunity to buy new homes when they are sold off‑plan overseas. He set up a Concordat to try to tackle this problem. As I have said earlier, it has not been robust or effective in dealing with this problem. The GLA has not been able to actively monitor or enforce the marketing activities of the signatories, and if the Concordat is broken there is no effective sanction available anyway. I want to take a better approach and it is clear we need further research and data to understand the problem in fine detail and to develop potential solutions. Any options we develop will be mindful of the needs of home builders to raise project finance and make sure our approach supports new development forward.
When we are discussing first dibs for Londoners, it is of course essential that we build more affordable homes that Londoners can benefit from, like genuinely affordable homes to buy for Londoners who have been stuck renting privately for years. My officers are working on a range of options about how to offer Londoners first dibs on more new and affordable housing and I will announce details in due course.
Sian Berry AM: OK. Thank you very much for that. The Green Assembly Members who came before me spent a lot of time highlighting the failures of the previous Mayor’s Concordat and so I do welcome that. I also welcome the idea of getting more research and data done on this because it is very hard to work out what is going on.
I want to ask, a new replacement for the Concordat would mainly cover the marketing of new private homes, but I believe your policy was intended also to cover the homes that Homes for Londoners builds, things that are built on TFL and other GLA land. Can you outline how your range of options might look at applying for your “first dibs for Londoners” policy there?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): That is one of the things that - to paraphrase the Assembly Member sitting not far from your left - the excellent Deputy Mayor Murray is looking into. If you have ideas, please feel free to pass them on to Deputy Mayor Murray.
The idea is to make sure that the new homes we build in London on public land are available to Londoners. There are a number of ways of doing so and residency is one way. What we are going to do in relation to the shared‑ownership homes is that if you have been renting for a long period of time with a private landlord, you can jump the queue in relation to getting one of those shared‑ownership homes. There are other ideas we have, but I would strongly advise that if you have ideas feel free to please speak to Deputy Mayor Murray because what is important is that we have a solution that addresses the grievance Londoners have that new homes that are built are not for them.
Sian Berry AM: Going on that definition of “Londoners” that you use, what I worry is that you mean to focus priority on how long people have lived here already and discriminate against recent arrivals. We both agree that the problem is not people coming to live in London; the problem is people treating homes as investments that they do not live in, ie your famous gold bricks. Do you agree it is better that any kind of “first dibs” policy should be welcoming to people who want to live in London and should focus on requirements for future occupancy rather than past residency?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am a very welcoming Mayor. The point is that, look, we know local authorities around London have different policies in relation to allocation of council homes and the residence requirement. Some local authorities have fewer years than others and so we already have a system in place where length of time in an area or length of time in London can determine your place on a waiting list for allocation of homes. My point is this: in the absence of a change in legislation from Parliament there is only so much I can do. I will use all the tools at my disposal to ensure the homes we build in London are affordable and built for Londoners.
Sian Berry AM: OK. That does not quite fit in what your Deputy Mayor for Housing told us earlier this month. He said that “first dibs” was a principle that would apply to people who had lived here for a number of years and people who move here to work. I wondered if you could maybe clarify whether that is also what you are thinking about.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): There will be lots of different developments across London. The same rule will apply to all developments and what is important is we have a system that means that homes that are built are built for Londoners rather than investors overseas.
Sian Berry AM: It seems that what you are saying is that your affordable homes you are building on TfL land would have a residency requirement?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): There are different plans that we have. For example, when it comes to giving permission for homes on private land, we want local authorities to be saying to the developer, “One of the conditions of you getting permission to build these homes” - and they could be market value homes, they could be all sorts of homes - “is that the homes that you sell you market here for a period of time before you market them overseas”. Six months is the ‑‑
Sian Berry AM: No, I was just asking specifically about the homes that you build and whether you would have a residency requirement.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Sure. No, you are asking for a one-size-fits-all definition of a “Londoner” and the point I am making to you is there are different provisions for different developments. What we want to do in the London Plan going forward is to understand the different needs in different parts of London. For example, a development in Southwark may be different, for obvious reasons, to one in Croydon and we need to understand that.
Sian Berry AM: OK. That is something we will have to keep talking about. One thing Camden Council is trying to do is introduce in its new plan a requirement or an expectation that the homes will be lived in, whether it is market developments or ones that they do. I hope you would be looking at doing that within the London Plan provisions as well.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Yes, and Camden is a very good council. One of the reasons why Camden is trying to do this is because it is using all the tools it has to stop properties being left empty and it is something that I find quite attractive.
Sian Berry AM: I may be out of time now, but thank you.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): My pleasure. Gender-blind interactions with GLA group organisations and gender- neutral titles Question No: 2016/1936 Sian Berry The GLA group organisations currently vary in whether they require gender information in interactions with the public, either explicitly or via limited title options. For example, registering to comment on the GLA's own website means choosing either a male or female gender and the form to apply to work at City Hall gives only 'Dr' as a gender-neutral title option. Will you take steps to allow people not to reveal their gender when interacting with all GLA group organisations, and introduce the option of the gender-neutral title 'Mx'?
The Mayor
I will ask the GLA Group to review the information that is required and consider any necessary changes to make the GLA Group as inclusive as possible, noting that TfL already offer their employees the option to register their title as Mx or Misc.
Earl's Court regeneration Question No: 2016/1937 Sian Berry Will you review the inclusion of TfL's tube maintenance depot in the redevelopment of Earl's Court?
The Mayor
London Underground's maintenance facility at Lillie Bridge Depot is within the Earls Court and West Kensington Opportunity Area and has the potential to provide 1,800 much needed new homes on land currently occupied by historic operational facilities.
TfL has completed a study which concludes that it is feasible to relocate the depot functions from Lillie Bridge Depot to Acton Town Depot, thereby creating a new manufacturing and maintenance centre of excellence at Acton Town Depot without impacting on services and freeing up the land at Lillie Bridge Depot for housing. Further studies are currently being undertaken in consultation with the trade unions. No decisions have yet been made and no development is likely before the mid-2020s. West Kensington and Gibbs Green Estates (1) Question No: 2016/1938 Sian Berry In March you told the Guardian that you would review the Earl's Court masterplan based on "serious reservations about the overall direction the scheme is taking". Will you now undertake this review, and consider the benefits of residents' plans for the West Kensington and Gibbs Green estates?
Written response from the Mayor received 03/10/2016
The Mayor
A review of the scheme with TfL, Hammersmith and Fulham Council and the developers could improve the overall masterplan and it remains my intention to undertake such a review. I also want to ensure that the proposed estate regeneration is carried out in full consultation with the residents of the West Kensington and Gibbs Green estates.
West Kensington and Gibbs Green Estates (2) Question No: 2016/1939 Sian Berry Will you press the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government to come to a decision on the Right to Transfer notice served by West Ken Gibbs Green Community Homes Limited on Hammersmith and Fulham Council on 11 August 2015?
The Mayor
I am working closely with Hammersmith & Fulham Council which is committed to achieving the best regeneration outcome for residents of the estates.
At present I consider this will best be achieved by the council remaining as landlord. Although ultimately the decision on this issue rests with the Secretary of State.
Community-led housing umbrella organisation Question No: 2016/1940 Sian Berry Last year a number of community-led housing organisations put a proposal to the GLA to fund an umbrella organisation to support models such as Community Land Trusts, which you have told me you want to support. The proposal is based upon six successful umbrella organisations in other parts of the UK. Will you consider this proposal?
The Mayor
I am willing to consider options that will be effective in this area and my officers are currently discussing the proposal for a community-led or co-housing umbrella organisation for London. Affordable housing models Question No: 2016/1941 Sian Berry As part of your review of models that provide "genuinely affordable housing" will you include Community Land Trusts, which can provide homes for rent and sale that remain affordable in perpetuity?
The Mayor
The Community Land Trust model links house prices and rents to local wages in perpetuity, meaning that homes for rent and sale can be genuinely affordable for this and future generations. The GLA owned St Clements site in Tower Hamlets, which will deliver London's first Community Land Trust homes, and I will continue to look at ways to promote the model.
East Wick & Sweetwater update Question No: 2016/1942 Sian Berry In answer to question 2016/0686 your predecessor set out a timetable for the East Wick and Sweetwater developments on the Olympic Park. Can you provide an update on the options study regarding a Community Land Trust and the partner selection process?
The Mayor
The options study for the community Land Trust at East Wick and Sweetwater has identified a number of concerns around mortgage availability and suitable safeguarding of nominations, which are being investigated further.
LLDC is liaising with the housing team at the GLA to understand better the lessons learned from the St Clements CLT in Tower Hamlets and, assuming the issues can be resolved, the selection process should begin later this summer, with a CLT partner expected to be on board by the summer of 2017. Property guardian companies Question No: 2016/1943 Sian Berry How much money has each of (a) GLA (b) MOPAC/MPS (c) LFEPA/LFB and (d) TfL given to property guardian companies to protect empty assets in each of the past three financial years?
The Mayor
GLA - Nothing
MOPAC - MOPAC/MPS has paid no money in the past three financial years to property guardian companies. MOPAC/MPS does not employ the services of property guardian companies to protect empty assets
LFEPA - LFB officers have explored 'Property Guardian' arrangements for vacant buildings in the past, but not utilised them as they do not provide 24/7 security for the vacant buildings. Following the protracted squatting issues experienced on the rear site at 8 Albert Embankment, LFB has employed 24/7 security there and at all 10 stations which closed in 2014 as part of LSP5.
TFL - During the past three years TfL spent the following sums on property guardian companies:
2013/14 - £1812
2014/15 - £755
2015/16 - nil Empty GLA Group properties (1) Question No: 2016/1944 Sian Berry How many properties owned by each of (a) GLA, (b) MOPAC/MPS (c) LFEPA/LFB and (d) TfL are currently empty? Please break down by the GLA and functional body, and include properties being looked after by security firms, property guardians etc.
The Mayor
GLA
Excluding those properties where the GLA's interest is limited to a reversionary interest in 100+ years, we currently have 7 buildings vacant (Millennium Mills, Graving Dock Tavern, Georges Diner, Dock Manager's Office, Central Buffet, 1-3 Salamons Way and Manor Road Retail Park).
MOPAC
There 16 buildings in the MOPAC/MPS that are no longer required for operational use and are vacant. 15 are held under leases which are being surrendered. The final building in Southwark has additional physical security provided by the MPS's FM suppliers and additional security inspections are being taken until the building is sold.
LFEPA contribution
LFEPA currently has seven empty buildings. These are:
Clerkenwell Fire Station (with 3 security staff)
Westminster Fire Station(with 2 security staff)
Southwark Fire Station and Southwark Training Centre (with 4 security staff)
Rear block at 8 Albert Embankment (with 3 security staff)
Mitcham Fire Station (with 2 security staff)
Basement premises at Brompton Road
Vacant cottages at West Hampstead fire station
TFL
TfL is committed to making the most of its property assets to contribute to a commercial development target of £3.4bn to reinvest in London's transport network.
The large number of properties in the portfolio means that the total number of properties vacant can vary over time as properties are returned, refurbished or re-let. TfL currently has 162 vacant properties from its estate of 2,500. Of these, 143 are commercial properties including retail units and arches which are either awaiting new tenants to move in, are being refurbished or are in the process of being marketed. The remaining 19 are residential units which are in the process of being refurbished or re-let. Empty GLA Group properties (2) Question No: 2016/1945 Sian Berry How many people are currently living in properties owned by each of (a) GLA (b) MOPAC/MPS (c) LFEPA/LFB and (d) TfL as property guardians? Please break down by the GLA and functional body.
The Mayor
GLA - None
MOPAC - None
LFEPA - None
TFL - None
Principles for estate regeneration Question No: 2016/1946 Sian Berry In developing a common set of principles for estate regeneration, as promised in answer to my question 2016/1589, will you ensure organisations representing London's social and private tenants and leaseholders are involved in this process?
The Mayor
I have asked officers to initiate a process of developing a set of common principles for estate regeneration and they will make sure tenants and leaseholders are involved.
Estate regeneration - London Plan (1) Question No: 2016/1947 Sian Berry At the Housing Committee on 7 June 2016, your Deputy Mayor for Housing told me that you would bring forward planning guidance on estate regeneration soon, ahead of the full revision of the London Plan. When do you expect to publish this guidance for consultation, and who will you involve in writing it?
The Mayor
We will be setting out principles for estate regeneration ahead of the full revision of the London Plan. We will be involving relevant stakeholders in its preparation, including boroughs, residents, housing associations, private sector house builders and voluntary sector partners. Estate regeneration - London Plan (2) Question No: 2016/1948 Sian Berry As the Housing Committee on 7 June 2016, your Deputy Mayor for Housing told me that you would bring forward planning guidance on estate regeneration soon, ahead of the full revision of the London Plan. Will you also bring forward minor alterations to the London Plan, introducing a policy based upon your manifesto commitment?
The Mayor
I am not currently intending to progress minor alterations to the London Plan, as this would further delay the full review of the London Plan, which is my priority.
Kingston Housing Zone - estate regeneration Question No: 2016/1949 Sian Berry How many homes are expected to be (a) built and (b) demolished as part of the Kingston Housing Zone? Please break the figures down by tenure.
The Mayor
The numbers of homes to be built and demolished as part of the Kingston Housing Zone are not yet confirmed as viability and planning exercise is currently underway. A number of options will be examined and consulted on with residents over the next several months.
Central Hill Estate Question No: 2016/1950 Sian Berry Thank you for your answer to question 2016/1591. In your manifesto you said regeneration should only go ahead if the residents support it. Will you ask Lambeth Council to ensure that residents are given a ballot on the final proposals, and that they don't proceed if the majority of the residents of the estate oppose them?
The Mayor
I will ensure that my officers work closely with Lambeth Council as they discuss regeneration of the estate with resident engagement panels, and as they consider options for wider consultation with the community. Postgraduate study support for Londoners Question No: 2016/1951 Sian Berry Will you consider a Mayor's Postgraduate Fund or Scholarship for Londoners who might not be able to access postgraduate study by other means?
The Mayor
London already has the highest percentage of graduates of any major city. The city's future jobs growth will be driven by a demand for higher level skills, including at Level 7 and above. I am committed to ensuring all Londoners are able to take advantage of these opportunities. Postgraduate loans are available for eligible students in the next academic year. This will open up postgraduate study to more Londoners. Another postgraduate route I think has real potential in London is higher level apprenticeships. I have asked my officers to develop proposals for how City Hall can best support their development.
Restricting adverts on Transport for London property Question No: 2016/1952 Sian Berry A constituent has asked me to find out whether you will consider bringing back restrictions on advertisements for holidays in the north of Cyprus on Transport for London transport and property?
The Mayor
In 2004, advertisements from the 'North Cyprus Tourist Centre Ltd' promoting holidays in North Cyprus were run on the side of London buses. Following a number of complaints, TfL refused permission for a similar further campaign.
TfL's refusal to run this campaign was challenged by way of judicial review and, in July 2005, the High Court held that TfL's decision should be quashed. The judgement stated that TfL's refusal had restricted freedom of expression by denying North Cyprus Tourist Centre Ltd a vital medium for its advertisements. The judge ruled that TfL's refusal had therefore violated article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
There is therefore a High Court decision that TfL was wrong to refuse to run North Cyprus tourism adverts. TfL's Legal team has confirmed that there is no apparent material difference between the circumstances in 2004-5 and those in place now. If TfL were to refuse to run such an advertisement, it would expect to be legally challenged and to lose that challenge. Parliament Square by-laws Question No: 2016/1953 Sian Berry Will you review the by-laws for Parliament Square to better support the democratic right to protest peacefully?
The Mayor
We have a structured process in place to facilitate the democratic right to protest and therefore no review of the byelaws is needed.
Cost of policing Parliament Square Question No: 2016/1954 Sian Berry What was the cost of policing Parliament Square in 2013, 2014, and 2015?
The Mayor
The MPS does not keep specific records of the costs of policing Parliament Square. There are many elements of policing that operate in this area, including Parliamentary Protection, Local Operational Patrols, Public Order Operations, and Roads and Transport Policing.
Parliament Square arrests and convictions Question No: 2016/1955 Sian Berry How many protestors on Parliament Square have been: a) arrested b) had charges brought against them c) been convicted? Please provide this for the years 2013, 2014, 2015.
The Mayor
The below table highlights the number of arrests made of protesters where the arrest location is stated as Parliament Square. The table also contains the number that has had charges brought against them. This is broken down by the last 3 calendar years.
Outcomes 2013 2014 2015 Arrests 36 26 1 Charged/Summonsed 7 16 0 Note from the Metropolitan Police Service regarding conviction data:
It was not possible to obtain data on convictions within the time available. To do so would require searches of multiple databases and would take considerable effort. Parliament Square prosecution costs Question No: 2016/1956 Sian Berry What is total cost of Crown Prosecution Service prosecutions against people protesting on Parliament Square during each of the years 2013, 2014 and 2015?
The Mayor
I'm afraid that this information is not available as all relevant cases could not be identified.
The data held by the CPS is not searchable by such a specific location, nor by whether or not the case involved some form of protest.
Disclosure and Barring Service caring profession priority Question No: 2016/1957 Sian Berry Thank you for your answer to my question 2016/1598. There are over 80,000 people waiting for Metropolitan Police DBS checks to clear. All applicants wanting to work in caring professions are required to complete an enhanced check before they can work unsupervised, or at all. These applicants therefore may be at risk of 'extreme financial hardship and/or a potential loss of employment'. Will you lobby the Disclosure and Barring Service to prioritise applicants in caring professions to address this?
The Mayor
The Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) systems are set up to process applications in the order they are received and not by sector or employment group. My Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime and MOPAC take this issue very seriously and have been working hard with the MPS to reduce the backlog.
In very exceptional circumstances, where it is apparent that delay is likely to cause undue hardship to an applicant, the DBS will do all it can to expedite the process by raising an escalation with the relevant police force.
It is important that the MPS and DBS work together to reduce the processing time for all applications.
Different Disclosure and Barring Service Categories Question No: 2016/1958 Sian Berry Could the Metropolitan Police provide the total number of people waiting for a) Spent b) Enhanced c) Enhanced with list, Disclosure and Barring Service checks?
The Mayor
I'm afraid the MPS does not hold this information. The Disclosure Unit had 73,768 cases that were in progress as at 19 June 2016. MPS costs of DBS Question No: 2016/1959 Sian Berry Thank you for your response to my question 2016/1597. Could you tell me how much the Metropolitan Police Service has spent staffing the DBS unit in June 2015 and June 2016, including all recoverable costs?
The Mayor
The Disclosure and Barring Service funds the Disclosure Units of all police forces, this includes staffing costs.
The MPS spent £430K on staffing the MPS Disclosure Unit in the month of June 2015.
The data for June 16 is not currently available. However, the staffing cost for the month of May 2016 is available and was £532,000. The MPS expect all of this cost to be recovered from DBS.
Reform of Vehicle Excise Duty Question No: 2016/1960 Caroline Russell Given your commitment to tackle air pollution in London, are you actively lobbying the Government to urgently review Vehicle Excise Duty to reflect local pollutants such as NOx, NO2, PMs as well as CO2?
The Mayor
Absolutely - I have raised this matter personally with the Secretary of State for Transport.
Vehicle Excise Duty (VED) does not account for local pollutants, which has led to diesel cars in the UK tripling since the last decade and industry experiencing record sales. Whilst this is regrettable, it demonstrates VED is very effective at influencing consumer behaviour.
This is a national problem causing pollution challenges across the UK. A change to VED would be a positive step by Government and it would demonstrate its commitment to meeting air quality legal limits as soon as possible. Diesel Fuel Duty Question No: 2016/1961 Caroline Russell With reference to the Government's stated intention of increasing the tax on diesel fuel, and given your commitment to tackle air pollution in London, will you lobby for levels that will significantly deter diesel vehicle usage?
The Mayor
I look forward to hearing more about the Government's stated intentions. It is also important to consider other fiscal measures that influence vehicle choice such as Vehicle Excise Duty and company car tax. Please see my response to MQ 1960 / 2016.
ULEZ boundaries Question No: 2016/1962 Caroline Russell At the London Assembly Plenary meeting on 8 June 2016, you confirmed that your Ultra Low Emission Zone public consultation will include the North and South Circular Roads inside the ULEZ boundary. Will you also include TfL controlled roads outside the ULEZ boundary that have high residential populations and high traffic levels?
The Mayor
Please see my response to MQ 2016/2563.
London City Airport decision Question No: 2016/1963 Caroline Russell Thank you for my answer to question 2016/1588 relating to the new evidence and advice you received from London City Airport. Will you put this information into the public domain?
The Mayor
All the information presented by London City Airport is public as part of the Compulsory Purchase Inquiry process and is required to be published as a matter of course.
The Airport provided both evidence and further rebuttals which sought to answer the concerns raised and informed the decision to withdraw the objection. All the information both from the Airport and the objectors can be found online at http://lcy-cpo.persona-pi.com/inquiry- documents.
As I have previously stated, my position in respect of the planning appeal is unchanged. Helicopter Flights along River Thames Question No: 2016/1964 Caroline Russell A constituent has contacted me regarding sightseeing, film, photography and survey helicopters operating along the River Thames causing widespread noise disturbance. Given your ambient noise strategy responsibilities, will you make a representation to the Civil Aviation Authority calling for far tighter restrictions on sightseeing helicopters and permit system for other non-emergency services helicopter flights operating in London and along the River Thames in particular?
The Mayor
I am concerned that there is a lack of regulation to protect Londoners from helicopter noise disturbance. I am also concerned that the Government's Aviation Policy Framework included a commitment to monitor the impacts of helicopter movements in London. However I have seen no evidence that this important work has been taken forward.
I will be updating London's Ambient Noise Strategy in due course, which will form part of my new Environment Strategy. As part of this, it will set out a range of actions to mitigate the impacts and effects of noise from air traffic on Londoners, including helicopters.
As the responsibility for noise from air traffic currently lies with the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) and Government (the Department for Transport), I will press them to develop a framework for managing and regulating helicopter noise in London.
Draft Old Kent Road Area Action Plan Question No: 2016/1965 Caroline Russell Given that the GLA is working with Southwark Council on the draft Old Kent Road Area Action Plan proposals, that could involve the removal of large quantities of industrial accommodation and businesses, have you carried out an assessment of existing economic activity and jobs in this area? Has there been analysis of the increasing demand for industrial and studio type premises? Please can you provide this information and break it down by economic activity, or if available by the UK Standard Industrial Classification?
The Mayor
Yes, together with Southwark Council, the GLA have carried out a study to map the employment activity in the AAP area. The study was underpinned by the objective to gain a fine grained understanding of the businesses operating in the study area, with regard to their sector of activity, number of employees, size of workspace and future business aspirations. The study area covers nearly 331 hectares and accounted for approximately 750 businesses and 9,500 jobs. The final study which confirms the figures will be published by Southwark Council in the coming weeks.
In March 2016 the GLA published the London Industrial Land Supply and Economic Study, which provides a London-wide supply-side context to the Old Kent Road AAP. A further study will be commissioned this year to look at demand for employment land London-wide. Supporting ethnic minority business clusters Question No: 2016/1966 Caroline Russell The report from Latin Elephant, 'The case for London's Latin Quarter; Retention, Growth and Sustainability' sets out a strategic vision for the development of the existing Latin American business cluster at Elephant and Castle and has wider applications for other ethnic minority business clusters across London. Will you support its recommendations and consider them for inclusion in the next revision of your London Plan and Economic Development strategy?
The Mayor
I am a great supporter of our small businesses and once my Business Advisory Board has been established, I will ask them to identify the best way of engaging with a range of businesses.
I will also ask the group to explore the implications of supporting ethnic business clusters such as at Elephant and Castle.
Garden Bridge 'sunk costs' Question No: 2016/1967 Caroline Russell On 25 May 2016 in your oral update on the report of the Mayor, you stated that, "Of the £60 million of total public funding, £37.7 million has already been spent by the Garden Bridge Trust, £24.25 million of which came from TfL and £13.45 million from the Government."
In making the decision not to cancel further funding for the bridge did you look at the full cost and benefit implications from now on, including maintenance obligations, or were you counting 'sunk costs' in your decision-making?
The Mayor
My decision was based on a full analysis of all the future costs and benefits of the project.
If the remaining funding for the Garden Bridge were to be withdrawn this would likely cause the cancellation of the project. In that case, no benefits would be realised and there would be some winding-up costs that would fall on the public sector.
If the public funding is maintained and the project is completed then the remaining public contribution will deliver the £330 million of benefits described in the project's business case as well as the repayment of TfL's £20 million loan to the Garden Bridge Trust.
The maintenance costs for the bridge after completion will be met by the Garden Bridge Trust, which has a credible business plan in place to raise the funds needed to meet those costs.
On the balance of benefits and public costs, I have concluded it is in Londoners' and taxpayers' interests for the bridge to be completed. Garden Bridge spending Question No: 2016/1968 Caroline Russell On 18 May 2016 on LBC radio, you said that £40,000,000 of public money had already been spent on the Garden Bridge. Will you provide accounts that show exactly how this money has been spent?
The Mayor
The Garden Bridge Trust has published a breakdown of how public money has been spent on the project: https://www.gardenbridge.london/news/article/public-funding-expenditure- breakdown.
Garden Bridge - A Mayor for all Londoners Question No: 2016/1969 Caroline Russell You pledged to be a 'Mayor for all Londoners' so will you therefore meet with Londoners concerned about the proposed Garden Bridge - via the organisation Thames Central Open Spaces - as well as the local Councillors of Bishops Ward to discuss the plans?
The Mayor
Given that a local resident is currently seeking to bring legal proceedings on behalf of Thames Central Open Spaces against Lambeth Council in relation to the Garden Bridge project, I do not feel it would be appropriate to hold such a meeting at this time. Idling coaches - Horseferry Road Question No: 2016/1970 Caroline Russell A constituent has contacted me about the longstanding problem of idling stationary coaches at the coach stand on Horseferry Road, SW1. Can you let me know what a) applicable non-idling regulations are in place and b) is TfL or Westminster Council the principle body responsible for enforcement of these regulations?
The Mayor
Horseferry Road is in the City of Westminster, which is responsible for signage, compliance and enforcement. Westminster has non-idling regulations, which instruct drivers to turn off engines when stationary, loading or waiting at the roadside. TfL has spoken to Westminster about this problem and the council is currently monitoring stationary coaches at this location.
More information is available at: http://transact.westminster.gov.uk/docstores/publications_store/parking/idling-offences- report-for-executive-director.pdf
TfL is also supporting a number of borough-led anti-idling projects through the Air Quality Fund, including a project being delivered jointly by ten London boroughs, led by the City of London Corporation, which will put friendly, trained volunteers on the street to engage with drivers about idling.
No-idling guidance for coaches Question No: 2016/1971 Caroline Russell Has Transport for London issued no-idling guidance to coach operators in central London? If not, will TfL issue this guidance directly to all coach firms reminding them to switch off their engines when parked or stationary?
The Mayor
TfL issues to coach operators an 'Operating Coaches in London' guide to restrictions and special parking arrangements for coaches in London. This specifically includes guidance to turn off engines, and is included in TfL's coach driver training courses. TfL also works with the Confederation of Passenger Transport and London boroughs to share best practice and encourage coach engine idling compliance.
The Operating Coaches in London leaflet is available on TfL's website at: http://content.tfl.gov.uk/operating-coaches-in-london.pdf Reporting idling coaches Question No: 2016/1972 Caroline Russell A constituent has informed me that in Germany there is an online reporting scheme that enables the public to make complaints about specific idling coaches. This helps to identify and deal with repeat offenders. Will TfL consider setting up an equivalent scheme?
The Mayor
TfL has previously trialled a similar scheme and formerly operated a 'no-idling' email address for such complaints. As this received very few reports, the email address has now been removed.
TfL ask all similar complaints to be directed to https://tfl.gov.uk/help-and-contact/. When on this page, it would be best for your constituent to use the 'Streets and other road issues' specific option and submit General Enquiry via the 'Online Form'.
Engine idling complaints Question No: 2016/1973 Caroline Russell How many complaints have TfL received about engine idling across all of its customer experience channels for each of the past five years? Please break down the response by channel.
The Mayor
The overall number of complaints per year continues to fluctuate between around 160 and 220. I am pleased that the increasing use of the internet and email to report problems shows that TfL is keen to assist Londoners with reporting problems that concern them. Please see the table below.
Financial Year E-Mail Internet Letter Telephone Total 2011-12 25 22 2 165 214 2012-13 27 22 118 167 2013-14 68 55 4 93 220 2014-15 67 30 3 64 164 2015-16 60 69 3 69 201 Total 247 198 12 509 966
Whole river catchment approach to flood prevention Question No: 2016/1974 Caroline Russell In light of the serious risks posed by surface water and river flooding in London, and the growing consensus for whole river catchment approaches to mitigating flood risk, will the Mayor as part of his climate adaptation responsibilities, draw up action plans for each of London's thirteen river catchments?
The Mayor
I am actively looking into this. Officers have had initial discussions with the Environment Agency about taking this approach. They have discussed a pilot study taking a 25 year view of the options for the London part of the River Lee catchment (including its numerous tributary rivers).
I anticipate giving further consideration to this in my Environment Strategy, whilst respecting the fact that the GLA itself does not have direct powers or resources in respect of flood risk management.
Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS) Question No: 2016/1975 Caroline Russell Given the Mayor's climate adaptation responsibilities and the risks posed to London from surface water flooding, are you concerned by the Government's decision to remove stricter sustainable urban drainage systems (SUDS) rules for all new developments, including small- scale developments from the Housing & Planning Bill? Will you lobby the Government to reconsider this short sighted decision?
The Mayor
Yes I am concerned about this. It reflects a pattern that the Government has reigned back on powers identified in the 2010 Flood and Water Management Act but has subsequently decided not to enact some parts of that legislation.
Regardless of Government decisions, the positive news is that the London Plan is being successful in delivering sustainable drainage measures which reduce existing rates of surface water run-off and that London Boroughs are also achieving good results in this respect.
Furthermore, officers have been working on a Sustainable Drainage Action Plan which I hope to publish soon. This Plan will seek to create a step change in the amount of sustainable drainage that is implemented across London. Old Oak Farm, Bexley Question No: 2016/1976 Caroline Russell In the election campaign you made a commitment to protect green spaces such as Old Farm Park. Given Bexley Council's decision to proceed with the sale of this park, will you use your influence to prevent this from going ahead?
The Mayor
My manifesto made clear that I want to use my powers as mayor to protect the Green Belt and open spaces, including Metropolitan Open Land, and during my election campaign, I visited Bexley and made clear my opposition to the sale of Old Farm Park.
Whilst I'm disappointed Bexley Council have decided to dispose of this site, I am unable to directly intervene to prevent London boroughs from selling land that they own. Each borough must make locally determined decisions about the management and maintenance of their land- holdings in order to make most effective use of this resource.
However, I shall work with boroughs and other land-owners to determine how best to prevent loss of green spaces across the city.
Crystal Palace National Sports Centre working group Question No: 2016/1977 Caroline Russell To ensure an appropriately joined up approach by the GLA in the formative planning stages of the Crystal Palace National Sports Centre, will the Mayor establish a working group approach with appropriate stakeholders, including local sports and park groups?
The Mayor
I have asked GLA officers to see how we can secure a long term future for the National Sports Centre. I am aware of the work being done by LB Bromley in respect of the wider Crystal Palace Park and also of the activities of Crystal Palace Sports Partnership and other local groups. Output from these processes will be of assistance as we take this forward. Crystal Palace National Sports Centre options Question No: 2016/1978 Caroline Russell Due to complexity of Crystal Palace National Sports Centre and the requirement for further appraisal work, will you take forward the proposals put forward by the Crystal Palace Sports Partnership with London Sport to establish new options?
The Mayor
When looking into how we can secure a long term future for the National Sports Centre, we will take into account the ongoing work led by LB Bromley on the implementation plan and governance for the wider park and also of the proposals that Crystal Palace Sports Partnership are developing in conjunction with London Sport. The output from these processes will be of assistance as we take this forward and will enable us to build on the work done by the GLA's consultants CSM in 2014/15.
Commitment to the Crystal Palace National Sports Centre Question No: 2016/1979 Caroline Russell One of the most iconic and accessible sporting venues in Europe, the Crystal Palace National Sports Centre and stadium, has been allowed to rot and decay into a shambolic state over recent years due to underinvestment and next to no marketing. Can you confirm that you are committed to ensuring a sustainable long term future for the 40-plus sports that thrive there, including track and field, indoors and outdoors?
The Mayor
I'm keen to see how we can secure a long term future for the NSC to ensure that it can continue to be used by athletes of all ages and abilities, across a wide variety of sports.
In terms of investment, the LDA spent in excess of £20m on the NSC less than 10 years ago and since the GLA inherited the property in 2012, investment in maintaining the property has continued. Unfortunately, due to the nature of the facility, much of the expenditure has been in areas unseen by the public. Capturing data on temporary road closures Question No: 2016/1980 Caroline Russell TfL does not routinely collect data on temporary road closures or changes, in terms of traffic levels, changes to peoples' travel patterns and satisfaction with travel conditions. Do you agree that this is a missed opportunity to gather evidence to support changes that could encourage more active travel and if so should TfL start routinely gathering this evidence, for example during the three month closure of Tower Bridge?
The Mayor
TfL routinely collects anonymised data from a network of over 1,590 Automatic Number Plate Recognition cameras as well as traffic signals and automatic traffic counters. This enables investigation of changes in traffic levels and patterns, and travel behaviour during temporary closures or changes to the network. Since 2010, the TfL Road Network Customer Satisfaction Survey has helped provide TfL with a better understanding of road users' expectations.
TfL is supporting customers, road users and stakeholders including local residents and businesses ahead of the City of London's closure of Tower Bridge by providing information and advice to reduce disruption to their journeys. I have asked TfL to monitor traffic levels, patterns and road users' response to this closure and to adapt advice and information accordingly. Cross-River Tram Question No: 2016/1981 Caroline Russell Camberwell is very poorly served by rail and public transport access levels will remain low in parts of Southwark until 2031. The cross-river tram would provide a public transport crossing in a part of central London where no new crossings are planned. Will you therefore review the business case for this project?
The Mayor
The Cross River Tram project was cancelled when the previous Mayor took office in 2008.
TfL has though invested in significant improvements to the transport networks along the corridor that the Cross River Tram (CRT) would serve, including upgrading the capacity of the Victoria and Northern lines and further service and station improvements are also planned.
Camberwell in particular has benefitted from the extension of the London Overground through the area, improving links to Denmark Hill station. TfL has also been working with Southwark Council and Network Rail to investigate the reopening of Camberwell railway station on the Thameslink line. Initial work suggests a station is physically feasible, and the next stages include assessing the operational impacts on the rail network of adding an additional station stop, and the impacts and benefits of the proposal on existing or new passengers, and on local development plans.
Many of the objectives of the CRT project have already been realised through these measures, and given the proposals for further transport improvements in the area, I do not intend to re- open the CRT project at this time.
London Transport Health Action Plan Question No: 2016/1982 Caroline Russell In 'Delivering Your Manifesto' TfL offered to update the Transport Health Action Plan during your first 100 days of office. Will you take TfL up on this offer?
The Mayor
I am committed to improving public health and reducing health inequalities, and a key element of this will be through better planning of London's transport network. Part of this is Transport for London's commitment to embed the Healthy Streets Approach across the organisation.
My Deputy Mayor for Transport is currently leading discussions to establish the most appropriate means of delivering enhanced promotion of more active travel and progress is being made.
I have also asked TfL to report to me before the end of the year on how they will better embed health considerations in decision making across the organisation, and how they will be measuring, and publically reporting on, health improvements and reductions in health inequalities. Healthy Streets Check Tool - Baker Street two-way proposals Question No: 2016/1983 Caroline Russell You recently confirmed that TfL will use the Healthy Streets Check Tool on all streets schemes at design stage. Please tell me what score the Baker Street two-way plans achieve?
The Mayor
I have asked TfL to develop a system where public realm schemes are assessed using the Healthy Streets Check during the design stage, to ensure the opportunities to maximise the health benefits of schemes can be incorporated.
Once this system has been established it will be applied to all new schemes. If this fits with the timing of the Baker Street scheme it will be included in that process.
Assessing street design Question No: 2016/1984 Caroline Russell What is the minimum Healthy Streets Check score that TfL should be achieving for all new junction and street designs?
The Mayor
I have asked TfL to begin applying the Healthy Streets Check, but the process and scope of the checks are still in development. All new junction and street designs will be expected to meet a range of scores which comply with the Healthy Streets Check criteria, but no minimum score has been set.
Cycle Superhighway 9 Question No: 2016/1985 Caroline Russell On 9 June 2016 your deputy Mayor for transport said 'It would be a tragedy if there were a superhighway that ended at a borough boundary'. Can you therefore guarantee that cycle superhighway 9 will not stop at the boundary of the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea?
The Mayor
Cycle Superhighway 9 is currently still in the early stages of design and is subject to further work and discussion with key stakeholders. These routes are delivered with the borough and other partners, and need to have their support in order to proceed. TfL has been working with the London Boroughs of Hounslow and Hammersmith and Fulham to develop proposals. Quietway 2 Question No: 2016/1986 Caroline Russell Given your stated commitment to Quietways, are you disappointed by Hackney Council's decision not to progress with changes to reduce through traffic in the London Fields area despite support for the scheme in the overall results of the recent public consultation?
The Mayor
In November 2015, TfL reviewed and approved the London Borough of Hackney's plans for a traffic management scheme in the London Fields area of Quietway 2. The London Borough of Hackney then consulted on this scheme and three other options, including width restrictions, a bus gate, and a road closure, between January and March 2016.
I have asked TfL to continue discussions with the Borough in order to find a suitable option to progress.
Pedestrian and cyclist fatalities Question No: 2016/1987 Caroline Russell In the first month of your Mayoralty, at least seven pedestrians and three cyclists have lost their lives in collisions on London's streets. Will you ensure that reducing road danger is at the core of your Transport strategy?
The Mayor
Every death on London's roads is a tragedy and I am determined to make London safer for all road users. I will set out more detail on my plans to improve road safety when I publish my revised Transport Strategy.
Helmet-cam footage and bus safety Question No: 2016/1988 Caroline Russell Do you agree that cyclists' helmet-cam footage is an excellent no-cost additional source of bus safety performance data that TfL should be soliciting?
The Mayor
Where clear images are available, footage can provide a useful insight into bus safety incidents and has been used by bus operators as part of investigations into customer complaints, accidents and near misses.
In other cases, it can show only one view and offers a partial, not complete, picture. TfL is always open to receiving or being referred to online footage in the event of a collision involving buses, to consider alongside bus CCTV. Healthier streets in Walthamstow Question No: 2016/1989 Caroline Russell Will you visit Waltham Forest to see for yourself the healthier and safer streets that have now been delivered in Blackhorse and Walthamstow Villages?
The Mayor
Blackhorse and Walthamstow Villages are great examples of how London's streets can be made healthier and safer for Londoners.
Val Shawcross, my Deputy Mayor for Transport, is planning to visit Waltham Forest to see the work there and I look forward to her updating me on the progress that has been made.
New Bus for London design Question No: 2016/1990 Caroline Russell Now that TfL owns the intellectual property on the design of the New Bus for London but intends not to order any further buses in their current form, will you make the designs freely available for reuse under open design or open source hardware licence?
The Mayor
I have instructed TfL to make no further orders for these buses.
TfL owns the intellectual property of the 'look and feel' of the bus and will effectively acquire the full intellectual property when the last vehicle currently on order is delivered. Given the investment already made, TfL will consider different approaches, taking into account any commercial opportunity it might bring to reinvest the income running and improving transport in London. Physical and mental health and wellbeing of bus drivers Question No: 2016/1991 Caroline Russell What data do TfL collect on the physical and mental health and wellbeing of its contracted bus drivers?
The Mayor
TfL does not collect data on the health and wellbeing of staff it does not directly employ. The private bus operators who employ drivers have a duty of care to their staff and regularly arrange road shows and forums related to healthy eating and living, and initiatives to reduce sick days such as advice on reducing stress, improving driver posture and looking for early signs of health-related issues.
There are also well-established arrangements for staff and company representatives to discuss and manage issues connected to health and wellbeing. TfL is now taking forward my aspirations for a unified, fair pay structure for London's bus drivers. I have asked that officers also consider the current approach to driver welfare in discussions with bus companies.
3 Digit Number to Report Dangerous TfL Bus Driving Question No: 2016/1992 Caroline Russell New York City has a 3 digit number (511) that takes calls from the public to report dangerous bus driving. Would you support the creation of a 3 digit number to allow the public to do the same in London?
The Mayor
TfL's Customer Contact team is the first point of contact for members of the public wishing to report any matters about the bus network, including safety concerns. Contact details are well publicised on notices onboard buses, at bus stops, and online. Reports made to the team are referred to the appropriate bus operator for investigation and tracked for a response and action to address any issues of poor driving.
Solar on all new Mayoral homes Question No: 2016/1993 Caroline Russell Will you make a commitment to integrate solar PV/thermal panels onto every new home the Mayor builds with suitable roof space?
The Mayor
I intend to look at how best to support and encourage solar on new homes, as well as on existing homes and other buildings. Please also see my response to oral MQ 2016/ 2016. Carbon reduction targets Question No: 2016/1994 Caroline Russell Are you committed to achieving the GLA's climate mitigation strategy's long-standing 60 per cent CO2 reduction target by 2025?
The Mayor
The current target of 60 per cent CO2 reduction on 1990 levels by 2025 was published in 2011. Since then, government policies in particular have made this target far more difficult to achieve.
Now we need to significantly ramp up rates of energy efficiency retrofit to lower energy demand in homes and workplaces, and support low carbon forms of energy generation and supply. I will consider revising the 2025 target when I produce my Environment Strategy to ensure that our targets are realistic, with the aim of setting policies and programmes in motion during my mayoralty that will make London a zero carbon city by 2050.
Carbon reduction targets Question No: 2016/1995 Caroline Russell Are you committed to achieving the GLA's climate mitigation strategy's long-standing 25 per cent decentralised energy target by 2025?
The Mayor
Low carbon decentralised energy forms a crucial element of my ambition to make London a zero carbon city by 2050. The current target of 25 per cent decentralised energy by 2025 was published in 2011. Since then, government policies in particular have hampered decentralised energy.
However, I still feel that this target is achievable and that London can lead the way in decentralised energy. I will set out in my Environment Strategy policies and programmes that develop the work currently being undertaken in London, promoting decentralised energy in new developments and supporting the retrofit of renewable technologies and establishment of heat networks.
London Environment Strategy Question No: 2016/1996 Caroline Russell What is the timetable for the production of the Mayor's London Environment Strategy?
The Mayor
Officers are currently working out the scope, issues and evidence and how the Environment Strategy will integrate with the other strategies that I intend to produce. London Energy Plan - publishing Question No: 2016/1997 Caroline Russell When will the Mayor's London Energy Plan be published?
The Mayor
The initial outputs of the London Energy Plan including an interactive map showing data relating to four scenarios to meet estimated future energy demand, along with a scenario narrative document, are available at www.london.gov.uk/londonenergyplan
These outputs form a valuable evidence base for the London Environment Strategy which will set future targets and establish policy to address meeting future energy demand in London.
London Energy Plan - studies Question No: 2016/1998 Caroline Russell What studies have been commissioned to support the development of the Mayor's London Energy Plan? When will these studies be published?
The Mayor
The following studies were commissioned to support the development of the London Energy Plan:
Developing an energy demand model for domestic and non-domestic buildings in London until 2050
Developing models that estimate: power demand and generation in London until 2050 and potential for heat networks in London until 2050
Developing a model to estimate the potential for solar PV until 2050
The outputs from these studies along with associated assumption documents will be published on the London Datastore this summer. Community energy Question No: 2016/1999 Caroline Russell Given the Mayor's manifesto commitment of supporting local community energy enterprises, will you examine opportunities to boost community energy projects in London, such as the award winning Brixton and Hackney schemes developed by Repowering London?
The Mayor
I want to harness the experience and enthusiasm of community energy enterprises to help London generate more low carbon energy and, where possible, reduce demand through energy efficiency.
I am currently assessing opportunities to support new and enhance existing community energy projects through my developing Environment Strategy and Energy for Londoners initiative.
District Heating schemes Question No: 2016/2000 Caroline Russell Given your decentralised energy targets, how will you support the growth of district heating schemes in London, such as the Islington Bunhill CHP project?
The Mayor
I will be supporting the growth of decentralised energy projects, most of which will incorporate district heating networks, through my new £3.5m development support programme. The programme will operate until the end of September 2019 and will provide expert strategic, technical, commercial and financial advisory services from a new consultancy framework, The framework is currently being procured and will be available from September 2016.
The Licence Lite project will also help decentralised energy schemes access a better market price for their current wholesale electricity price that will improve the business case for decentralised energy projects.
License Lite launch Question No: 2016/2001 Caroline Russell When will the GLA's Licence Lite initiative be formally announced?
The Mayor
I am still finalising details of Licence Lite. This is subject the regulator Ofgem having completed its processes for the grant of the licence. License Lite Question No: 2016/2002 Caroline Russell Who will lead the GLA's Licence Lite operation? Who will they report to within the GLA?
The Mayor
I am still finalising details of Licence Lite.
License Lite and Transport for London energy consumption Question No: 2016/2003 Caroline Russell What proportion of Transport for London's total electricity consumption will be supplied by the GLA's Licence Lite operation in 2016 and in 2017?
The Mayor
The Licence Lite operation will offer local generation a better price for their export electricity. It is a pilot scheme and this year aims to be its first year of operation. However, I am still finalising details of Licence Lite.
Initially I intend to sell the electricity to Transport for London and we could meet just over 2 per cent of TfL's low voltage electricity demand for every one megawatt generation capacity.
My objective is to supply up to 10 megawatts of electricity by the end of the first year and this would meet approximately 23 per cent of TfL's requirement for low voltage electricity.
London Climate Change Mitigation and Energy Strategy Question No: 2016/2004 Caroline Russell When will the annual update to the London Climate Change Mitigation and Energy Strategy be published?
The Mayor
Officers are currently preparing an annual update, the publication of which is yet to be finalised. Transport for London and renewables Question No: 2016/2005 Caroline Russell How much electricity was generated by renewable projects owned or developed by Transport for London? What proportion of Transport for London's electricity consumption does this represent?
The Mayor
In 2014/15 TfL generated around 500 megawatt hours (MWh) of electricity from onsite renewable sources. This represented 0.03% of TfL's electricity consumption.
With the Elizabeth line operation commencing in 2018, this is forecast to rise to around 700 MWh per annum by 2020. In addition, by 2020 TfL is planning to deliver 70,000 MWh per annum of low-carbon electricity via its power station at Greenwich, representing 13% of London Underground's annual consumption.
Impact on London of National Funding Formula for schools Question No: 2016/2006 (Oral) 2 Commitments Jennette Arnold How much do you think London schools could lose if the Government's current proposals to move to a national funding formula go ahead?
The Mayor
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. I am concerned about the Government’s proposals for a national funding formula, which they say aims to ensure school funding is simpler, more transparent and pupil characteristic-led. As London boroughs currently receive the largest proportion of the dedicated schools grant, the capital is at risk of losing funding under any new model. What London schools could lose is the great progress they have made with targeted extra investment, particularly during the London Challenge school improvement programme, which ran from 2002 to 2011 and brought together schools and boroughs to lead and achieve improvements in the capital.
The GLA and London Councils submitted a robust response to the Government’s national funding formula consultation in the spring. There has already been some recognition of London’s arguments. For example, the high mobility of families across borough boundaries as a specific London issue has been acknowledged by the [Education and Childcare] Minister Sam Gyimah in the Commons backbench debate on 4 May 2016. We anticipate a second part to this consultation to be published with information on the weights being proposed in the formula. My officers will analyse the implications for primary and secondary schools across the capital and will respond accordingly. If London’s high needs are not adequately recognised in the formula, I will be seeking a meeting with the Secretary of State together with London Councils.
It is in no one’s interests that London’s schools go back to pre-London Challenge days and I do not want to see the education and future employment success of young Londoners jeopardised in any way. I will use the power of City Hall, working with all political parties at London Councils, to fight strongly for a properly and fairly funded school system in London.
Jennette Arnold OBE AM (Deputy Chair): Mr Mayor, thank you for that very full, thorough and thoughtful answer. It covers so many of the concerns that I and I know a number of Assembly Members sitting around this horseshoe share, as well as the wider education family, not to mention families, parents and indeed young people themselves.
On the point that you raised about 2002 to 2012, that is now part of - I hope - the history of education in London and we have moved forward to such an extent that we are, as we should be, the leading capital of this country in terms of performance, in terms of excellence and in terms of achievement of our children, especially those children in our most deprived boroughs.
My follow-up question to you is following on from what you said about your officers, Mr Mayor. I do know that you have, for me, one of the best education teams in this building; GLA officers who have done a really great job in encouraging the education sector. Can you charge them with the job of monitoring and looking to gather London-wide intelligence so that our understanding of any impact can be brought to you as soon as possible and so that you can continue to make the case on behalf of London’s children? They cannot be put in a position where they are left to go back to where they were. That is totally unacceptable. Would you agree with me?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): That is a very good idea, Assembly Member Arnold. Just to reassure you, we will do that. There is a cross-party approach to making the case for education funding in London and it is being co-ordinated by the All-Party Parliamentary Group for London, co-chaired by Bob Neill MP, whom many will know as a friend, and Steve Reed MP also, whom many of us know as well, supported by London Councils and, as you said, excellent GLA officers.
There is a reason why we saw the progress that we did when we had the additional funding. There is a challenging intake in our schools in London linked to deprivation, English as an additional language and special educational needs and disabilities. We have seen the progress made as a consequence of targeted help. As a cross-party issue on which we all agree, you are right that we should unite forces and use the intelligence to make sure we make the case.
Jennette Arnold OBE AM (Deputy Chair): Just for information, Mr Mayor, in case you are not aware, this Assembly does have a cross-party Education Panel. I chaired that Panel in the last administration and we brought recommendations from our work on that cross-party panel to the former Mayor.
Through you, Chairman, it would be good if this Panel could bring together a summary of the work that it has done on this and other education issues to you. Would you be willing to accept that and consider those recommendations again and, hopefully, re‑endorse them, if that is such a thing?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I would do, Chairman. Just to echo that, the previous Mayor deserves credit for, with Jules Pipe [Chair, London Councils], writing to the Secretary of State along the lines that Assembly Member Arnold refers to. Of course I will relook at that. Jennette Arnold OBE AM (Deputy Chair): Thank you very much.
London Ambulance Service Question No: 2016/2007 (Oral) Onkar Sahota Under this Government the London Ambulance Service has suffered enormous pressure. Recent reports have highlighted a string of failings in the service. In addition the LAS has constantly failed to reach even basic response times targets. The state of the service is so bad the CQC recently took the LAS into special measures.
At a time when London's resilience could be tested from anything from a deadly new virus to a major terrorist attack do you think it is time to bring the LAS under your strategic control in the same way other blue services are run?
The Mayor
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. I know that Assembly Member Sahota has taken a particular interest in this area over the years and has considerable expertise in this. I have read the report you did in the last session.
Can I begin this answer also by expressing my admiration and support for the paramedics and other staff at the LAS, who work tirelessly for Londoners.
I am also aware of the significant challenges that the LAS is facing and of course they concern me. The LAS has not met its attendance time targets over the last few years, although I understand that this situation is now slowly improving. I am fully aware that this is an extremely important issue for Londoners and I will shortly be meeting with Dr Fionna Moore, the LAS’s Chief Executive, to discuss performance and look at how the service can improve.
I can see the benefit of all blue-light services working more closely together and we will explore what more we can do on this, but the links of the LAS with London’s NHS are important. There is a concern, as I understand it, that this relationship risks being damaged if it is stripped out and brought totally under GLA control and so there is some thought and work required in relation to this. That being said, I believe there is a case for us collectively having a greater role in scrutinising performance and holding the LAS to account because it is clear that it has been underperforming for some time now.
Dr Onkar Sahota AM: Mr Mayor, of course the consequence we are seeing in the LAS is symbolic of what is happening in the NHS with the effect of cuts in funding and the closure of A&Es. You earlier on referred to North Middlesex in northwest London where I work and Ealing Hospital is up for closure. This has a great impact on A&E services. This service has been suffering for many years and I am glad that you as the Mayor of London are taking an interest in this and will, I hope, raise it.
There was a report produced even before I came here in 2011 by the Assembly saying that there should be some Mayoral involvement in the trust board of the LAS. You also mentioned whilst you were campaigning that you felt there should be some involvement, particularly in accountability. What are your thoughts on that now at the moment?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): As I said, I will be exploring this issue further. I do know that there is current collaboration between blue-light services including the Joint Response Unit between the LAS and the MPS in 12 boroughs where demand is very high, a dedicated team in the LAS call centre to handle police calls, a new mobile communication system for blue-light services in development and co‑responding pilots between the LAS, fire and MPS respectively. There is other joint work going on.
However, I take the point that you make seriously and the report that you were responsible for seriously as well and we should explore this issue further. I know that you have met with my team already. We should carry on that dialogue because your expertise at the coalface is different from mine and I am keen to make sure that I take that expertise on board.
Dr Onkar Sahota AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor.
Harris Review Question No: 2016/2008 (Oral) 1 Supplementary Questions Unmesh Desai Can you update the Assembly on the progress of Lord Harris' review into London's terror preparedness?
The Mayor
Please see the answer to MQT 2016/2312
London Fire Brigade and LSP 6 Question No: 2016/2009 (Oral) Andrew Dismore In the last year, fire deaths rose by 20% and attendance times have increased in wards previously served by fire stations that were closed under the previous mayor's direction to LFEPA and against the wishes of LFEPA. As LFEPA is now working on the next safety plan, LSP 6, to tak effect in 2017, will you confirm that your driving factor behind it will be to minimise fire and other safety risks to the public and maintain and where possible improve front line fire engine attendance times, and that LSP6 will not be just another cost cutting exercise?
The Mayor
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. Let me start by saying that I believe that the previous Mayor was too aggressive in making fire cuts. The Fifth London Safety Plan (LSP5) led to the closure of 10 fire stations, the removal of 27 fire appliances and the loss of over 500 firefighter posts. Over half of the wards in London have seen an increase in attendance times following these cuts.
Safety is of paramount importance for Londoners and to me. This is why I am concerned about my predecessor’s record on fire and that is why I will be commissioning a review of fire resources in the capital to ensure we can be as safe as possible. The findings of my review will shape the strategic element of the Sixth London Safety Plan (LSP6). This will indeed focus on an improved frontline service. It certainly will not be on cost-cutting for the sake of cost- cutting.
At the same time, there will be opportunities for the fire service to be innovative in its use of resources. For example, if it can share its estate with other public services and look for opportunities to convert service property into housing, it should consider doing so. There will also be opportunities for further collaboration with other blue-light services, including joint control rooms.
Finally, I would say that Government grant levels for the fire service need to recognise the crucial role played by firefighters in community safety and in the London context the essential contribution they make to the city’s resilience, which is something I am sure Lord Harris will pick up in his review.
Andrew Dismore AM: Thank you, Chairman, and thank you for that answer, Mr Mayor. I think we would all agree, certainly on this side, that the last Mayor failed to meet your manifesto aim, which is to ensure that the service is fully equipped for the challenges ahead, dealing with preventing fires, but also coping with civil contingencies.
You also overlooked the fact that the previous Mayor frequently overruled the views of the Fire Authority, which was opposed to these cuts being implemented. Indeed, the last 13 fire engines did not even need to go because the books could have been balanced without that cut. The result has been longer attendance times and arguably more fire deaths, for example, the one in Camden Road in my constituency last year, and more loss and damage to Londoners’ homes; for example, the house that was burnt almost the ground just a stone’s throw from Belsize Fire Station earlier this year.
If the LSP6 review shows we need to have some of the cuts restored to give more equitable attendance times across the capital, will you ensure the London Fire Brigade has the funding to enable it to do so?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Can I thank the Assembly Member for his question. He has been assiduous as a Member of the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority (LFEPA) in relation to this issue.
One of the reasons I am undertaking a review - and Assembly Member Twycross and I are working closely in relation to this - is to ensure we can be as safe as possible. What I do not want to do is to retrofit my review around trying to make cuts and that is what I want to be reassured about in relation to the review taking place in relation to the resources we have in our city. That will shape the strategic review going forward in relation to LSP6. One of the things that I need to do as the Mayor is to make sure that the Government grant levels recognise that we, as a capital city, have needs that need to be met.
Andrew Dismore AM: Thank you for that. Boris Johnson’s projected GLA budget for the next two years expected LFEPA to make cuts - or the Fire Brigade because LFEPA is being abolished - of £16.5 million over the next two years. Do you expect the Fire Brigade to stick within that budget envelope? To develop an effective LSP6, it shows that that is insufficient.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): What we need to do is to undertake the review. That will shape LSP6 and then we can talk about the resources subject to the recommendations of the review.
Andrew Dismore AM: Just to come back to my original question, is LSP6 going to be driven by the need to respect safety and prevent fire and the other problems that the Fire Brigade deals with? Is it being driven by that rather than cost, as opposed to the previous Mayor’s approach?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): It is really important that I give you this assurance that you need, which is that LSP6 will be unlike its predecessor in that we will not retrofit the review around making cuts. We are going to undertake the review in relation to whether London is ready, bearing in mind the cuts that have been made over the last period. That will shape LSP6 and we will then see what resources are needed to make sure we have a fire service fit for purpose for a city like London.
Private Rented Sector Question No: 2016/2010 (Oral) 2 Commitments Tom Copley What devolved powers over the private rented sector will you seek from the Government?
The Mayor
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you very much for your question. With 2 million private renters in London, it is important to improve the private rented sector. I will make sure that the actions I take to improve the private rented sector, like naming and shaming rogue landlords, are well-considered and effective.
This is in contract to the last Mayor, who let renters down by wasting time and money on ineffectual initiatives like the London Rental Standard. Rather than raise the number of accredited landlords in London to 100,000, it has only attracted 2,000 new landlords. The scheme has been seen from all quarters as a failure. Even worse, the previous Mayor pushed ahead with his plans, despite warnings from officials that his target was - and I quote - “clearly unrealistic and unachievable” and that it would take - and I quote - “more than 50 years to accredit a sufficient number of landlords to meet the target”.
I will work closely with boroughs to support practical measures to improve life for London’s renters. Where boroughs want to introduce landlord licensing schemes and where they are appropriate, I will support them. Licensing schemes enable boroughs to identify the minority of landlords who are treating their tenants badly and to take action against them.
At the moment, my powers over the private rented sector are extremely limited and so I will be making the case to the Government to devolve more powers in this area. There is a strong case for the Government giving the Mayor power to approve landlord licensing schemes, which would enable my team to work much more closely with boroughs that want to introduce these schemes to drive up standards. We clearly need to focus on building more homes that are genuinely affordable to rent and buy, but I want to help London’s 2 million private renters in their current homes, too. Most landlords offer a good service to their tenants, but it is important that we identify and take actions against the minority who do not. I am keen to see the GLA given a stronger role by the Government in making this happen.
Tom Copley AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor. As you are aware, I am sure, in Scotland and in Wales they have extensive devolved powers over the private rented sector, including over tenancies. Are you seeking and do you think the Government will grant you devolved powers over the length of tenancies, annual rent increases and things like that?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I do not want to give a running commentary on negotiations taking place now.
Tom Copley AM: I understand that.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am ambitious but realistic.
Tom Copley AM: There are some other things as well that could be done, in some cases within your existing powers. For example, there is no reason why councils cannot ask people when they send back their council tax forms for the name and address of their landlord. As far as I am aware, no borough does that, but that will allow councils to start to build up a database of the landlords in their areas. Is that something you will encourage boroughs to do when they are collecting council tax?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): That is a cracking idea. Why do I not take that away and speak to the Deputy Mayor for Housing and London Councils in relation to what we can do to collect data in a sensible way that avoids duplication?
Tom Copley AM: Sure. That is excellent. Another idea: one issue that landlords have raised is that even when they want to offer longer tenancies, they cannot because of the conditions on their mortgages. In fact, I had this experience recently: when I asked for a two‑year tenancy I was told that was fine, but then they came back and said, “Actually, the conditions of the mortgage are that you can have only one year”. The Government, I believe, had said that it was going to take banks to task over this but, as far as I am aware, nothing has happened.
Could you use your influence as Mayor, both with the Government and potentially directly with lenders themselves, to make sure that landlords can offer tenancies for at least, say, three years, for example?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Again, I will look into that as well.
Tom Copley AM: Thank you very much. Thank you, Chair.
Off-site construction Question No: 2016/2011 (Oral) Nicky Gavron Do you see a role for off-site/modular housing as a contribution to delivering your housing targets and environmental objectives?
The Mayor
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. Yes, increasing the use of modern methods of construction, including off-site manufacture and modular housing, is an important part of delivering the new homes that London so desperately needs in a way that addresses the looming construction skills crisis and environmental objectives. The off-site manufacture of housing is limited at the moment, but all the signs are that it has great potential to grow. I understand that Berkeley Homes is building two streets of 22 homes at Kidbrooke Village at Greenwich that all offer a compact design, using off-site fabrication. Those are permanent homes, but other options are being developed elsewhere in the capital too. In Lewisham, for example, the PLACE/Ladywell project is providing 24 factory-built flats for families who would otherwise be in bed and breakfasts (B&Bs). This innovative use of a vacant brownfield site means the space can be well-used temporarily before a longer-term project is finalised. Both of these examples show what potential off-site manufacturing could have and it is good there are signs in the market that this approach is set to grow.
Legal & General Homes, for instance, launched plans earlier this year for the production of up to several thousand homes a year from a factory near Leeds. I am keen to support this kind of innovation and I will work with housing associations, housebuilders and the construction industry to promote greater use of modern methods of construction. My team are having conversations with the industry to discuss ways in which the GLA’s investment and procurement processes can support them and I hope that off-site construction will play an important part in building the homes that we need.
Nicky Gavron AM: That is all music to my ears. I am really pleased that you see a role for off-site modular housing in your housing programme. It is an area that I have been tracking now for a few years. These are not the boxy prefabs of the past; these are really high‑quality, long‑term, durable homes and they are super energy‑efficient. With the ones I have seen in Rainham, you could take a four‑bed, three‑storey house and have £1,000 slashed off the bills of that family, leaving them with just a bill of £300 a year for energy so that they have some extra money for childcare and so on.
The other thing is that the speed with which they can be up; they can be up in a matter of weeks. Now, this speed of delivery means that we can meet housing need faster and cheaper than with traditional methods of construction. Local authorities, as you indicated, are latching on to this and they see it as a great opportunity and particularly I could cite Enfield here. It is seeing the scope for the rented sector all the way from social rent to market rent on its own land.
Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Are you asking the Mayor to agree with you?
Nicky Gavron AM: I will get to the question. Here is the opportunity: the local authorities need help and they need help with procurement, as you indicated, but they are coming to me and asking, “How can we do this?” I will forward them to you. They need help with procurement. The companies need continuity of demand. Is there a way - and it is going beyond really what you said - that you could actually assist local authorities and companies by co-ordinating a procurement process? Then you would get the scale, almost a procurement/supply agency of some sort?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chairman, my team are having conversations with the industry to discuss ways in which the GLA can look at investment and procurement to help support the industry.
Just on your point about the environment, the other benefit it is worth bearing in mind when you think about the environment is when thinking about the construction of homes. Some of the research I was reading was that off-site manufacture brings significant savings in embodied energy and construction waste ‑‑
Nicky Gavron AM: It does.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): ‑‑ less air pollution from deliveries to site and less disruption to local residents and business. That is one of the reasons why I am keen to look into this. As a former ward councillor, I know how sometimes building homes can be controversial. Deputy Mayor Murray, whom even these guys like, is looking into this and so I am sure he will speak to you about moving this forward.
Nicky Gavron AM: Yes. Can I say that it is also a new industrial sector? There is scope for jobs, for new skills and for new apprenticeships of course in this. Up until now anything that has been produced in London has been produced in factories, where the space has been licensed, and in other parts of the country - you referred to Legal & General - the continuity of demand and the scale is very attractive to inward investment. Do you envisage that we could have a permanent factory here in London, with your backing, preferably on the river?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am not sure about that. What is important is we look at how we can help the industry and how we can support the industry, and of course one of the best ways for the industry to do well is to have a market not of 65 million but of 500 million: free trade, a single market without many of the rules ‑‑
Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Careful, Mr Mayor; purdah.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am sorry; what do you mean, Chairman?
Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Purdah.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I was just talking about good common sense, but it is really important that we support industries. If you believe in supporting small businesses, you want a free market.
Nicky Gavron AM: Absolutely. It is good to hear that. By the way, 20% of Germany’s homes last year were built with modular housing.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): You see, that shows the benefit of co-operation and working together and we can learn so much - and they are neighbours - and the skills and the jobs. What I recognise, as the Mayor of London, is there are lots of manufacturing firms here in London and we would not want to eliminate manufacturing jobs. That is why it is really important that I support the initiatives you are talking about and I intend to do so until 10.00pm tomorrow night.
Nicky Gavron AM: Brilliant.
Economic Challenges facing London Question No: 2016/2012 (Oral) 1 Supplementary Questions Fiona Twycross As part of your "opening up the books" on the last Mayor's activities, what issues have you uncovered around London's economy?
The Mayor
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. There are many challenges that were not tackled by the last Mayor. In addition to the answer I gave earlier on in my oral update, I will set out some more this morning.
Poverty is much higher in London than in the rest of the UK. A third of all inner London residents are in poverty and nearly a quarter in outer London, both higher than any other region. Around 1.2 million of those in poverty live in a working family, up 70% in a decade. In inner London 300,000 children - or 46% - are living in poverty after housing costs and 400,000 children in outer London - or 32% - are in child poverty. The number of children in poverty in London’s private rented sector has doubled over the last ten years to reach over 500,000. Housing has now become the number one problem for business, not just for millions of Londoners who cannot afford their own home because of the failure to increase supply. London rents have been hiked by a quarter since 2008, double the rise in the rest of the southeast, which saw the next highest rise.
Investment has not kept pace with London’s growth, with key projects like Thames Gateway Bridge cancelled, while resources were wasted on projects such as a Thames Estuary Airport - remember that one? - the New Bus for London and the Cable Car. The number of those paid below the London Living Wage increased during the last Mayor’s two terms. Finally, even where progress was made, like on apprenticeships, Mr Johnson [Boris Johnson MP] missed his own target by around 70,000 apprentices. Mr Johnson simply failed to sort out London’s problems in inequality, weak investment and low pay.
Fiona Twycross AM: Thank you. I am pleased you highlighted some of the issues that a number of Assembly Members here have highlighted in the past to your predecessor. I would like to focus a little bit on low pay because, as you are aware and as you made clear, low pay became an increasing problem under Boris Johnson and we have now a situation in which real wages have fallen considerably, leaving Londoners worse off, and in which 60% of adults and children living in poverty now come from working households.
What specific steps are you planning to make to ensure that Londoners get a fair day’s pay for a fair day’s work?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Firstly, I welcome the Government’s announcement of a National Living Wage. The problem is that to Londoners it is meaningless because the National Living Wage is less than the London Living Wage. There are 2 million Londoners not receiving a London Living Wage. We are working with local authorities and others to make sure as many Londoners as possible get a London Living Wage.
We also need a supply chain in relation to procurement to encourage the private sector to pay a decent pay for a decent day’s work. The good news is the private sector sees the benefits in relation to recruitment and retention of paying a decent pay for a decent day’s work. There are literally hundreds of companies in London already paying the Living Wage; there are hundreds more who are accredited and paying the Living Wage. What we have to do is make employers recognise the benefits to their business by paying a Living Wage. City Hall is useful for the levers I have, but it is also a pulpit to persuade, to convene and to cajole people to pay Londoners a decent pay for a decent day’s work.
Fiona Twycross AM: Great. I am really pleased to hear that. One of the things you have referred to in the past is around your ideas in your manifesto being a movement. If you think about other movements in the economic area, you have the fair trade movement, which revolutionised people’s ability to actually be able to tell what workers were remunerated and the kind of conditions that people worked in overseas. One of the things we are lacking in this country still is a consumer movement around knowing workers’ rights, what kind of treatment they get at work, everything from whether they get to keep their tips through to whether their employers pay the Living Wage.
Will you work with organisations like the Living Wage Foundation and trade unions to ensure that consumers know what choices they are making, for example, when they buy everything from coffee through to hotel rooms in London?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Absolutely. There is a big role for me to play in co‑ordination, but also one of the things we have to do is set up a fairness unit here in City Hall to give that sort of signposting advice, to provide transparency and to help Londoners get a decent pay for a decent day’s work.
Fiona Twycross AM: That is very encouraging, thank you.
Child poverty in London Question No: 2016/2013 (Oral) Joanne McCartney In London 37 per cent of children are living in child poverty. Will you consider adopting a child poverty strategy in London to ensure that more concerted focus is brought to this issue?
The Mayor
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. There is no excuse for child poverty in a city as prosperous as London. This is an issue that affects all of us in this city. We cannot bring about effective social integration when nearly four children in ten live in poverty. That is why I am committed to putting in place effective, targeted interventions to tackle these issues and monitoring levels of child poverty and foodbank use. Most children in poverty come from working families. This is why tackling low pay and under-employment is so important. We must also address the wider drivers of child poverty, such as housing costs, childcare and the impact of welfare reforms. I look forward to working in partnership with boroughs, civil society and Londoners to bring a concerted focus on child poverty. Nationally, two‑thirds of children in poverty have at least one parent in paid work. This undermines the claim that work in and of itself is sufficient to guarantee a route out of poverty. To fully address child poverty in London, a range of strategies will be needed to tackle low pay and under‑employment, housing costs and security, childcare costs and availability, as well as the effects of welfare reform and issues linked to immigration status.
It is housing costs that set London apart from the rest of the country on child poverty. On a before-housing-costs basis, London’s child poverty rate is 18% compared to 17% nationally. Once housing costs are taken into account, London’s poverty rate is 37% compared to 28% nationally. Housing security is also a major issue for London’s children. There are 83,370 children living in temporary accommodation, whilst London’s in‑year school move rate is 20% higher than the national average. The prevalence of child poverty in London is simply too important a challenge to ignore. Tackling it as part of drives to improve social integration and promote fairness and equality will be core to all my statutory strategies.
Joanne McCartney AM: Thank you, and thank you for your very positive response there and your commitment to focus on this issue, which is at great odds with the previous Mayor.
You are obviously aware that child poverty is increasing, both in absolute terms and relative terms. The Institute of Fiscal Studies has said that by the end of this decade, the rise in child poverty will have wiped out all the gains that we made under the previous decade from 2000 to 2010, primarily as a result of benefit changes. Many of us around this Chamber were horrified last year when Iain Duncan‑Smith [former Secretary of State for Work and Pensions] announced he would change the way in which he calculated child poverty, looking at some performance indicators. Charities such as the Children’s Society have said that those national indicators are totally inadequate.
When you are looking at your strategies, can I ask if, as far as London is concerned, you will look and you will talk to those charities dealing with this issue about what measures that we should put in place and how you should monitor that?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): That is a really important point, Chairman. Moving the goalposts may give you a better number, but it does not take those children out of poverty. We need to speak to experts in the field, in civil society, in local authorities and in other agencies and I intend to do so.
Joanne McCartney AM: Thank you.
The Causes of Road Congestion Question No: 2016/2014 (Oral) Florence Eshalomi A recent report from INRIX argues that roadworks are a major contributor to increased congestion in the capital, while research from the Greener Journeys campaign claims Uber and the use of online shopping are to blame. What do you believe are the major causes of increased congestion, which has led to a 12% increase in journey times in Central London since 2012, and how do you intend to address this problem?
The Mayor
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you very much, Chairman. Congestion is a real problem in London. I have, therefore, instructed TfL to draw up a roads reliability plan looking at more proactive management of the road network, more enforcement and better information for Londoners, and to present long-term options for managing congestion in the capital.
The causes of congestion are complex. There have been changes in the mix of traffic, for example, and there has been an increase of 56,000 private hire drivers licensed by TfL in 2008/09 to more than 100,000 drivers today. That is why I am lobbying the Government for new powers to give TfL the ability to control the number of private hire vehicles. Light freight vehicles have increased by 11% between 2012 and 2015 and all delivery vehicles now make up 17% of traffic in London. TfL and I are therefore working with the freight industry to reduce the number of deliveries at the busiest times, and looking at how to consolidate deliveries made and encourage use of the river for freight. Just under half of the recent delays in central London were due to the construction of the new Cycle Superhighways. With the majority of construction complete, journey times in these areas have begun to decrease, but I will review existing and planned schemes to make sure any lessons learned are applied to future schemes. My predecessor did not do enough to work with the utility companies to co-ordinate roadworks and infrastructure projects. I have directed TfL to work more closely with the utility companies to co-ordinate maintenance and upgrading of infrastructure in order to ensure that the same sections of road are not repeatedly subject to works.
Florence Eshalomi AM: Thank you. Mr Mayor, you covered some of the points that I was going to ask you. It is good to see that there will be a crackdown in terms of the number of private hire vehicles. One of the other things around congestion is the cause of accidents as well. There has been a significant increase in terms of accidents from congestion. Mr Mayor, would you agree with me and get TfL to look at some work in terms of how we link and reduce congestion on our streets to make them safer?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Absolutely. One of the things that Deputy Mayor for Transport Val Shawcross is working on is in relation to road liability and also safety as part of the Walking and Cycling Strategy and so I can certainly feed that in.
Florence Eshalomi AM: Mr Mayor, you may be aware in terms of some of the congestion - and again we are seeing a decrease in car usage because there are more people using taxis and an increase in private hire vehicles - that congestion is having a major effect on people who use buses. I use the bus on a regular basis. Navigating with a buggy on the London Underground is still quite challenging sometimes and so we do rely on buses. However, this congestion causes a number of buses to go on diverted routes and there has been a 17% drop in bus journeys over the last few years.
I want to ask, Mr Mayor: what work are you undertaking with TfL to ensure that our buses are not adversely affected by the congestion and how can we speed up bus journeys again?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): My own view is that they are being affected. One of the reason why passengers, especially in central London, may be using buses less is because of the lack of reliability due to roadworks. A lot of what you are calling “congestion” is caused by roadworks. I have asked TfL to look into this because what we need to do is make sure we are co-ordinating roadworks better and are being tough on those who dig up our roads, which will reduce congestion. Part of it is modal shift. There is no point in diverting people from their cars to buses if they are being delayed because they will just go back to their cars. It is really important that we address the issue of congestion and unreliability of buses caused by roadworks. It is one of the things that TfL is looking into.
Florence Eshalomi AM: Finally, Mr Mayor, on the issue around making sure that TfL is looking at the range of roadworks and major highway developments going on, a number of complaints from residents come from the fact that they think it is the councils and the fact that they are not talking to TfL and the major companies. Do you think that we should really commit to naming and shaming some of the companies that are causing delays with these roadworks?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I remember when I was a Minister in 2009 giving to the then Mayor powers in relation to permits when it came to digging up roads. I am not sure they have been used properly. Therefore, we want to make sure we work better with the utility companies to co-ordinate maintenance and upgrading in order to ensure, for example, that the same road is not dug up again and again and to ensure they do it quickly and swiftly. If you have examples that we need to know about, please let me know.
Florence Eshalomi AM: OK, thank you.
Rail Devolution & Step Free Railway Stations Question No: 2016/2015 (Oral) Navin Shah As TfL takes over rail lines and stations in London will you expect the Government to provide funding to make those stations step free or will the burden fall to TfL?
The Mayor
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you very much. It is essential that TfL takes responsibility for more inner suburban rail passenger routes in London and the southeast to enable and accommodate growth and support housing and jobs. Given the recent performances of Southeastern and Southern services, enough is enough. It is time for TfL to ensure that more communities benefit from better customer service, better accessibility, more consistent and integrated fares and information, a better travel environment and more staff available to help.
I have had positive discussions with the Secretary of State and my Deputy Mayor for Transport Val Shawcross is moving this forward with Lord Ahmed [Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Transport]. I look forward to working with the DfT’s to ensure robust agreements are in place of the transfer of south eastern services in June 2018. Accessibility improvements to these stations would be funded separately by the DfT’s Access for All programme; for example, the step-free access at Crystal Palace London Overground Station, thanks in part to a successful local campaign. TfL and I will continue to make the case to the Access for All fund for additional step-free access schemes across London, including where TfL becomes responsible for these stations.
More widely, I want London’s transport system to be accessible to all Londoners. The plans I have inherited are not good enough. There are 202 stations currently without step-free access, which represents around 75% of the Tube network, including the Docklands Light Railway, London Overground and Tramlink, and this is still around 45% of TfL stations without step-free access. I want TfL to be more agile and ambitious in bringing forward plans. That includes working with local boroughs to find better, cheaper solutions, as was the case at Greenford Station, and leveraging in investment from developers to fund station improvements.
Navin Shah AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor for your very forthright and comprehensive response covering the whole range of accessibility. Indeed, you are in dialogue already with the DfT over funding through Access for All funding agreements and there is the work you said the Deputy Mayor for Transport will be doing.
As you know, Mr Mayor, 57% of London’s railway stations are not completely step-free. Will you be relying entirely on the DfT’s Access for All fund to make the improvements that are necessary or will you be making improvements using TfL’s fund as you do with all the Tube stations?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Did you mean on TfL stations or did you mean on the Overground stations?
Navin Shah AM: On the Overground stations, where the issue is, obviously.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Sure. Firstly, can I just congratulate you on your campaigning, not just taking me to Harrow on the Hill, but the other campaigning you are doing around Access for All.
Navin Shah AM: I would like to come back to you on that at some point in time, indeed.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I thought you might. Let me tell you what it is. It is a combination of Access for All, working with the Government in relation to whether it is Network Rail or the TOCs and what they can do, and TfL. Frankly, if you are a commuter who is not able to use a station because it is not accessible to you, you do not worry where the money comes from. That is why we are also looking at where the developers have a role to play in relation to alleviating the problem of having accessible stations.
Navin Shah AM: The concern is that access for all funding comes to an end by 2019/20 and therefore we need to cover the period beyond that. That is one set of solid lobbying that you need to do with the DfT. If you feel that the Government is not forthcoming, is this something that you will consider as to how TfL can fund the accessibility?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): We need to lobby the Government. There are just so many stations that are inaccessible and we have to lobby the Government to carry on the Access for All fund post 2019.
Navin Shah AM: Finally, Mr Mayor, TfL will be taking over a number of railway lines in the coming years, as you know. Do you think that it is right that more funding is allocated to London to ensure the number of step-free stations increases? This is something you touched upon. This is something you really need to work very hard with Government on so that, if you are going to take over railway lines, there is the requisite funding access as well that goes with it.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): The concern that we have is that we will, hopefully, take over running these lines in 2018, 2019 or 2022 - depending on which line it is - and we will be given a bill for the cost of making these stations accessible. That is why there has been negotiation with the Government, with TOCs and with Network Rail to make sure we get a good deal for London’s taxpayers.
Navin Shah AM: Thank you very much.
Supporting Solar in the Capital Question No: 2016/2016 (Oral) Leonie Cooper Following what, in my view, were the environmental wilderness years under the last Mayor, leaving London with the lowest amount of installed solar power capacity of any region in the UK, what steps will you take to ensure the capital benefits from 'the solar revolution'?
The Mayor
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. Solar photovoltaic (PV) is one of many low-carbon energy technologies that I will support to help London move towards becoming a zero-carbon city by 2050.
Under the former Mayor, London had the lowest installed solar PV capacity of any region in the country. As of the end of March this year London had 20,179 installations, which is 2.7% of the installations nationally. My new Environment Strategy will include steps to help realise the potential for solar PV generation in our capital through incorporating my approach to solar energy. While there are many challenges to deployment of solar PV in London, the levels to date have been low. Although London has the third largest installed PV capacity on community buildings of all regions and has seen a significant level of deployment on new buildings, we need to do more on retrofitting solar to existing buildings. We are a city of roofs and so we have the potential. Recent changes to the feed-in tariff supporting solar PV have affected the industry and supply chain and seen a drop off in deployment rates. However, as the cost of solar continue to fall and new technology such as battery storage becomes more affordable, the business case of solar should improve.
Through my Environment Strategy and the establish of Energy for Londoners I will work to overcome some of the challenges to deployment through closer working with the London solar industry, exploring financing and mechanisms to make PV more affordable and working with the outer boroughs to increase deployment in those areas. I will also be leading by example by increasing the installation of solar on GLA and TfL properties and land. In the shorter term I will be supporting License Lite to create a market for larger-scale solar energy and my retrofit programmes will be looking at how they can better support deployment.
Leonie Cooper AM: Thank you very much, Mr Mayor, for that comprehensive answer. I just wondered if I could come back on a couple of points.
In October 2015 the previous Assembly Environment Committee published a report entitled Bring me sunshine! after carrying out a very thorough investigation into solar energy and it contains eight recommendations. Unlike Assembly Member Boff, who obviously thinks you spent the last seven week sitting around reading previous reports, I am not going to assume that you have necessarily read it, nor indeed that the officers in your team have read it, either. However, I do wonder whether you might ask some of your officers to have a look at it. It contains some very useful recommendations and I wondered if you might consider adopting most, if not all, eight of them as part of your forward-going strategy.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chairman, can I suggest that the Assembly Member sits down with the team we have and goes through them to discuss what our response is to the report because it is a good report and we should do it justice? I worry about the brevity of time here and we cannot do it justice, but let us organise that.
Leonie Cooper AM: That would be most welcome, Mr Mayor. I just wondered if I could come back to some of your earlier points.
Unfortunately, we are starting from an incredibly low base here in London, and it does seem that the previous Mayor was no more interested in increasing solar installs than the Conservative Government is, given the very severe and sudden cuts to the feed-in tariff. Whilst some cuts obviously relate to a decrease in cost, one would accept those, but it is just the very sudden cuts and they have had a very unhelpful effect on the industry.
Do you think that a London feed-in tariff and a big push around community solar, as well as your plans for Energy for London, are the kinds of things that we would need to look at to make London a solar leader again?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): You are right to be critical of my inheritance, but Bristol, Nottingham and Scotland have all made rapid progress and there are things we can learn from them, but also in cities across Europe. I want to pinch their ideas. Energy for Londoners is all about scale. If we can build up the scale we can do the feed-in stuff, but also there are some communities across London who are already starting to do this and we can learn from them as well.
Leonie Cooper AM: Finally, Mr Mayor, I just wondered if you could say something in a tiny bit more detail about the need and the difficulty about increasing solar in the private rented sector with a mobile population of people renting. As part of the wider work on the private rented sector, which we have touched on this morning, would you include in that work looking at how we might incentivise the landlords, as well as making their properties more energy efficient, to think about installing solar?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): You are right to raise this challenge you have, but just do the maths. There are 2 million Londoners renting from private landlords. London has a higher proportion of flats and tenanted properties than other regions, which make installations more complex, and you have to think about innovative ways of getting solar on these buildings.
As our understanding of these barriers develops, my officers will work with barriers to getting solar on these properties. My officers will work with key stakeholders to develop strategies, policies and programmes with clear actions for solar and other low carbon energy supply measures in London. Other cities where there are properties let do manage to have solar. One of the reasons could be because they are longer tenancies, certainty for the tenant and for the landlord. Clearly, because we have short tenancies, the same dynamic does not apply. We have to think about a way of doing that. I do not have the answer yet, but that means the officers speaking to and listening to key stakeholders.
Leonie Cooper AM: Thank you very much, Mr Mayor. That is very helpful indeed.
Future Health Structure for London Question No: 2016/2017 (Oral) Len Duvall It was widely welcomed that in your manifesto you said you saw the Mayor having a more strategic role in Health. With devolution moving apace in Manchester have you had opportunity to develop your concept of this strategic role and the future role for the London Health Board?
The Mayor
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you. I believe cities are uniquely placed to deliver for their communities and I intend to play an active role in improving health outcomes for Londoners. Health and care is a complex and fragmented system with disbursed leadership across organisations, sectors and geographies. Devolution is a powerful lever for improving health and care services, reducing variation in quality and outcomes and involving and engaging Londoners in developing solutions to health and care challenges.
I will build what local government, health partners and the previous Mayor started with a health and care devolution agreement - a great example of cross-party, cross-sector working across London health and care organisations - and the companion agreement with the national Government as well. I intend to strengthen the London Health Board, which I chair, so that it will bring strong political oversight of the programme, support the engagement of all London’s communities and make the case to the national Government when we have the findings from the pilots. At the next London Health Board on 20 June, I will want to hear from the current members about the impact of their work to date and set the future priorities of the board. Given the scale, complexity and pace of change, together with the demographic and site challenges in London, a system-wide approach will be required to tackle the issues facing the health and care system.
Len Duvall AM: Thank you for that, Mr Mayor. Do you accept that with the demise of the former Strategic Health Authority for London there is a role for some strategic co-ordination to get some joined-up decisions that make sense of the future direction of the NHS and health outcomes in London?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Absolutely.
Len Duvall AM: In your thinking around the devolution agenda, you will be considering whether City Hall is that focal point. This may be early days in some of the thinking around the pilots, but will you look at those pilots? Personally, I remain unconvinced that they are the right pilots in terms of furthering the devolution agenda, either for our colleagues in local government or even in terms of City Hall. I am a great believer of a national NHS but I do believe we can give some regional push to its direction. Would you be prepared to look at those?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I would, but let me just explain the conundrum that is really within the NHS. We do not want to inadvertently fragment the NHS.
Len Duvall AM: No.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Officials working in London with fiscal leadership in London are far better placed than civil servants in Whitehall and Jeremy Hunt [Secretary of State for Health] to say what is best for London. Within London there is fragmentation and so you are right on your first question about the need for strategic leadership. In the Government’s position, officials in the Department of Health and the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) want to see the results of the pilots before they decide the direction of travel of devolution on health. Manchester is already of course doing some of the stuff as well. It will be a combination of the pilots, plus Manchester, plus what we have to take on in relation to financial liability. What we do not want is cost-shunting where we get the responsibility but not the resources.
Len Duvall AM: I agree with that, Mr Mayor, but what we want and what Londoners want is an honest debate about the future and direction of the NHS and what it means for them. You have highlighted the issue about the mental health services and actually people are being short changed, particularly young people, as you have highlighted. It needs a voice to bring those people together and start championing those issues.
Can I take it that maybe one of the first steps for the London Health Board, which the previous Mayor failed to do, is that you will publish the minutes of those discussions and of course that you will engage with the Assembly about maybe the future role and remit of that board? I recognise you have a limited role at the moment, but something has to give between anonymous officials making decisions over Londoners’ lives in a non-transparent way where you have to go in to see how the building blocks are built in London and not realise what the add-on implications are. This morning we heard about issues around safety enclosure, but is that really true and has this been on the agenda for some time and is that the only way that we can achieve change in the NHS? I am becoming very ‑‑
Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Could you keep interjecting, “Do you agree with me that…”?
Len Duvall AM: Sorry. Yes, thank you very much, Chairman. Do you agree with me that in giving people the answers to some of the pressing problems they face, particularly around the LAS, we probably have given too much time for them to come up with the proper answers to those questions and we now need some action from them to make that real difference? Sadly, that may well be around some of the other services of the NHS.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I agree absolutely with your analysis of the problems in London’s health division. Also, you are right to remind us of the importance of giving patients confidence and that is really important. I believe genuinely in openness and transparency. I want do not want to do a standard headline by telling you want I plan to do with that, though.
Len Duvall AM: Thank you.
Congestion and Air Quality in Central London Question No: 2016/2018 (Oral) Florence Eshalomi As you are aware, slow traffic flow and congestion in Central London have a serious impact on air quality in the capital. Taking this in to account, and given the partial closure of Tooley Street, is now the time to close Tower Bridge for 3 months?
The Mayor
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. Tower Bridge is the responsibility of the Corporation of London. The closure of Tower Bridge for three months was scheduled before the election. I have had no say over the timing.
I have spoken to TfL about this closure and expressed my concerns. However, its modelling work suggests the impact of closing Tower Bridge at the same time as works in Tooley Street is marginal. There are also benefits in running the work together as the overall period of disruption is reduced.
I have instructed TfL to do all it can to minimise disruption, including an embargo on other works during the construction period, co-ordinating these works with all other major works in the immediate area, maintaining pedestrian access across the bridge at all times except during three weekends when a ferry service will be provided and a free route in the Congestion Charge zone so that diverting traffic will not incur the charge. I have also asked TfL to ensure information about the closure, its impacts and alternative routes is communicated effectively.
This is a clear example of why I am committed to delivering additional river crossings in east London and to relieving congestion on the capital’s roads through infrastructure improvements and encouraging modal shift.
Florence Eshalomi AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor. Again, I agree that this is something that you had to pick up when you took office. The concern from residents and businesses around Tooley Street, around Great Dover Street and around Borough High Street is that they cannot cope. This congestion is causing a real major nightmare and I am concerned in terms of cars then sitting in traffic and the air quality.
Can I please ask you, Mr Mayor, in speaking to the Corporation of London to ask if they can delay this work until Tooley Street is open?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): My understanding, Chairman, through you, is that it has been delayed before and that the Corporation needs to get on with the repairs needed for Tower Bridge. That is my understanding from discussions I have had again recently because of the concerns I had raised. As I said in my answer, the further steps required to make sure it does not adversely affect local residents and commuters more than it would do otherwise are very important.
Florence Eshalomi AM: Thank you.
British Transport Police Review into responses to sexual offences Question No: 2016/2019 Joanne McCartney British Transport Police are currently conducting a review into how BTP responds to sexual offences. You have previously stated that you were appalled about the recent decision by BTP to scrap the sexual violence unit. Will you ensure that a formal response from your office or MOPAC is sent to BTP setting out quite clearly that survivors of sexual assaults and rape on the transport system must be able to access specialist officers as soon after an incident is reported as possible?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
I am determined to do all I can to ensure that Londoners can travel around the network safely and securely. I have clearly set out my concerns about the British Transport Police (BTP) proposal to disband the sexual offences unit and the initial lack of consultation on this extremely important issue. I have raised this with the BTP and I have their assurance that tackling sexual offences on public transport remains a high priority. My Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime, Sophie Linden, is in regular contact with the BTP.
Furthermore, I have been assured that the serious concerns raised by a number of stakeholders will be carefully considered prior to any formal consultation on proposals to restructure crime investigation.
Gospel Oak Electrification works Question No: 2016/2020 Jennette Arnold As you will be aware, from June 4th the Barking-Gospel Oak line closes for its much needed electrification works. However, users in North East London will face increased travel costs during the works. Could you look into the arrangements made by TFL in order to mitigate the affect it will have on the residents in North East London so that residents don't pay more than when the service was running?
The Mayor
Please see my answer to MQ 2016 /2194. Barnet planning decisions and affordable homes Question No: 2016/2021 Andrew Dismore Do you share my view that Barnet Council's major planning decision making has led to the underprovision of affordable homes in a large number of major schemes, especially focusing on 'viability'? If so, what can you do as Mayor to increase the number of affordable homes built in Barnet?
The Mayor
Viability arguments are being used across London to reduce levels of affordable housing delivery and some boroughs do not have the resources and expertise necessary to test and challenge them authoritatively. My forthcoming Affordable Housing SPG will help address this issue and I intend that schemes referred to me that are not delivering sufficient amounts of affordable housing should be rigorously scrutinised and challenged.
Access for All Funding for Streatham Station Question No: 2016/2022 Florence Eshalomi What discussions have you had with Ministers to discuss Access for All funding in London?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
I want our transport system to be accessible to all Londoners and I am working with TfL to develop more innovative ways to fund step-free projects.
Streatham is among the stations nominated for the Department for Transport's Access for All funding in Control Period 5 (2014-19), although following the Hendy Review, some schemes will be deferred to Control Period 6. It has not yet been confirmed whether Streatham is one of those schemes.
I will continue to make the case for Access for All funding for additional step-free access schemes across London, including any stations for which TfL becomes the new contracting authority.
In addition to Access for All funding, the Department for Transport and TfL will also consider opportunities to leverage investment from local authorities and developers, which could be used to fund station improvement works. London Parks and Open Spaces Question No: 2016/2023 Leonie Cooper In light of sustained central government cuts to council budgets that are forcing boroughs to reduce spending on parks and open spaces, what will the Mayor do to support London Boroughs, volunteers and community groups in conserving these valued public spaces?
The Mayor
The State of UK Public Parks report by the Heritage Lottery Fund has demonstrated that there has been reduced spending on parks and open spaces as a consequence of public sector spending constraint imposed by the Government.
I will continue to highlight the adverse impact of this and lobby government to ensure local authorities are adequately resourced to deliver a full range of necessary and important local services.
I shall also work with London boroughs and others to help make a stronger business case for investment in London's 'green infrastructure' by revealing its true economic value.
I'll also be developing an environmental improvement programme and tree-planting campaign to provide local communities with support to conserve and enhance local green spaces.
First Aid and Basic Life Saving training Question No: 2016/2024 Jennette Arnold Do TfL or bus companies on the TfL network train their staff in First Aid and Basic Life Saving training?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/09/2016
Transport for London (TfL) provides first aid training to staff so they can assist customers. First aid training is mandatory for Dial-a- Ride drivers, Roads and Transport Enforcement Officers and Victoria Coach Station Customer Service Assistants, and all London Underground station staff. This includes London Underground Customer Service Assistants, who complete the one day Emergency First Aid at work training course as part of their continuous development programme.
These first aiders regularly provide treatment for customers and there are many examples where this has made a considerable difference in the event of a customer being taken ill or being injured. Briefings are also provided on the use of defibrillators, as these are designed so that formal training is not required. Gospel Oak Electrification works (2) Question No: 2016/2025 Jennette Arnold In view of the pledge that you made to freeze TFL fares, what immediate steps will you take to ensure that North East constituents travelling on the Barking-Gospel Oak line do not have to face such increases in fares when commuting?
The Mayor
Please see my answer to MQ 2016 /2194.
Accessibility on the Bus Network (1) Question No: 2016/2026 Jennette Arnold The signage for the priority seats for disabled passengers on the new route masters are sited so low that anyone sitting in the seats obscures the signs. These seats are popular as they are located by central entry doors.
Can the signs be re-sited and put either much higher up on the side panel just below the window, or at the bottom of the window itself?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28/06/2016
Thank you for bringing this matter to my attention. I have asked TfL to investigate the possibility of repositioning the priority seat signs on New Routemasters entering the fleet, and report back to me by late autumn this year. Accessibility on the Bus Network (2) Question No: 2016/2027 Jennette Arnold Whilst for disabled passengers, who wish to plan underground journeys, maps showing stations with step-free access are very helpful, there is no indication on TfL's "select a stop" maps on the website, or on their other maps which shows bus stops that do not have a seat or a shelter.
Can TfL develop an icon for their website and printed maps which indicates bus stops where there is no seat and/or shelter?
The Mayor
This is a very useful suggestion, and something that was raised when TfL undertook recent engagement with disabled customers, users and representative organisations.
Action is being taken to make more information about the bus network available to the public and app developers as part of TfL's open data policy and I have asked TfL to take your specific suggestion forward as part of that. Accessibility on the Bus Network (3) Question No: 2016/2028 Jennette Arnold There are a number of bus stops throughout London which have been closed and relocated, generally to facilitate building or roadworks, but not re-opened in their original position after the work is completed. This can cause a further difficulty for disabled passengers planning a journey. An example of this is the 388 bus stop (SM) in Victoria Park Road, Hackney, which has been closed for some years. The building works which led to this are nearly finished and most of the hoardings removed, but the bus shelter remains boarded up and the original bus stop not re-opened.
What is TfL's timescale or policy regarding re-opening closed bus stops when the need for closure has passed and does TfL levy a passenger inconvenience fine for developers who take longer than promised to carry out works?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
All requests for suspending a TfL bus stop due to building or road works are reached in agreement with TfL. TfL charges a fee depending on the length of the closure. Bus stops are re-opened when the agreement expires or when the works are completed if that is sooner.
To minimise disruption whilst works are underway, TfL will put in place a temporary stop wherever possible. If a stop cannot be returned to the original location, a new location is identified.
For bus stop SM on Victoria Park Road, a temporary bus stop was located 34 metres along Victoria Park Road to minimise disruption to passengers using route 388. The bus stop will be returned to its original position once the works have been completed. Toxic Air (1) Question No: 2016/2029 Jennette Arnold Given recent claims that the previous Mayor apparently supressed a report demonstrating that 82% of schools in areas that exceed EU air pollution limits have a disproportionately large number of pupils from deprived households, what assurances can you give me that you will act quickly to protect the health of my constituents in North-East London?
The Mayor
I was elected on a mandate to improve air quality, which kills the equivalent of almost 10,000 of our fellow Londoners each year. In my first week in office I announced a policy consultation on a major package of measures to tackle air pollution which I expect to launch in the coming weeks.
These measures include consulting on proposals to extend the Ultra Low Emission Zone to the North and South Circular Roads and the possibility of bringing forward elements of the original proposals earlier than 2020. This would be complemented by a proposed requirement for heavy vehicles to meet the ULEZ standards (i.e. Euro VI) across London by 2020.
To ensure action is taken as soon as possible, and to give an early signal to Londoners about the need to tackle vehicles like diesel, which are disproportionately polluting, I am considering an extra charge on the most polluting vehicles entering central London from 2017. Transport for London (TfL) will also lead by example, expanding and accelerating its efforts to reduce emissions from the bus fleet.
These measures, when combined with support and national action from Government, will ensure London meets EU legal standards for air quality as soon as possible while improving public health and reducing inequalities. Toxic Air (2) Question No: 2016/2030 Jennette Arnold How many primary and secondary schools in Hackney, Islington and Waltham Forest are in locations where average NO2 levels are above EU limits?
The Mayor
Based on provisional analysis of the 2013 concentrations of NO2 provided as part of the London Atmospheric Emissions Inventory, the following numbers of primary and secondary schools have concentrations of NO2 above the EU limits*.
Islington - 21 Primary Schools, 9 Secondary Schools
Hackney - 25 Primary Schools, 12 Secondary Schools
Waltham Forest - 2 Primary Schools, 1 Secondary School.
The analysis of the LAEI2013 datasets is ongoing in order to provide further updated information in relation to exposure to air pollution across London.
Boiler Scrappage Scheme (1) Question No: 2016/2031 Leonie Cooper How many Londoners have benefited from this initiative and how many boilers have been scrapped?
The Mayor
To date over 6,000 people have applied, or are in the process of applying to the scheme.
Of these, over 1,200 applicants have so far submitted claims, following installation of a new energy efficient boiler.
Boiler Scrappage Scheme (2) Question No: 2016/2032 Leonie Cooper Are any statistics available on how much carbon has been saved from the installations to date?
The Mayor
To date over 6,000 people have applied, or are in the process of applying to the scheme.
Of these, over 1,200 applicants have so far submitted claims, following installation of a new energy efficient boiler. This equates to an estimated saving of over 1,800 tonnes of CO2 per annum. Boiler Scrappage Scheme (3) Question No: 2016/2033 Leonie Cooper Are any statistics available on how money the scheme has saved participants?
The Mayor
To date over 6,000 people have applied, or are in the process of applying to the scheme.
Of these, over 1,200 applicants have so far submitted claims, following installation of a new energy efficient boiler. The scheme will save these applicants around £480,000 off the cost of their boiler replacements, and an estimated £408,000 off their annual heating bills.
In addition, as some installers and manufacturers have come forward with matching offers, some of these applicants are likely to have saved a further £400 off the cost of their boiler replacement.
Boiler Scrappage Scheme (4) Question No: 2016/2034 Leonie Cooper Will you commit to continue to fund the scheme so more Londoners can benefit?
The Mayor
I am currently exploring what more can be done to improve London's retrofitting programmes and schemes. Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Question No: 2016/2035 Leonie Cooper One of the principal challenges to the growth of the electric vehicle market has been the lack of functioning charging infrastructure. What steps will you take to tackle this?
The Mayor
TfL has been working with private electric vehicle charging networks to help improve performance. For example, TfL supported BluePoint London to improve the Source London network, which has reached over 90 per cent network availability. TfL continues to work with all operators, and new entrants to the market, to encourage competition and provide best value for users.
TfL's Ultra Low Emission Vehicle Delivery Plan includes actions to ensure London has reliable and accessible charging infrastructure, which I will keep under review.
To accelerate the growth of ultra-low emission vehicles in London, TfL has ambitious plans to support the delivery of rapid charging points, a new scheme for installing residential charging points, and car club charging points across London by 2020. This important infrastructure will be delivered, in part, through the £13m Go Ultra Low City Scheme. TfL is working closely with London boroughs to deliver this infrastructure across the capital. Air Pollution (1) Question No: 2016/2036 Leonie Cooper What are the main steps that national government need to take to match your ambitious proposals to clean up London's air?
The Mayor
I was elected on a mandate to improve air quality, which kills the equivalent of almost 10,000 of our fellow Londoners each year. In my first week in office I announced a policy consultation on a major package of new measures to tackle air pollution which I expect to launch in the coming weeks.
However, this does not reduce the need for Government to also do more. Government has a crucial role to play in addressing air quality as many of the most effective policy levers for taking action are currently exclusively available to them (e.g. fiscal incentives) or need to be implemented on a national basis in order not to distort important markets (e.g. diesel vehicle scrappage scheme). Considering air pollution remains a national issue with continuing exceedances across the country, Government is also uniquely placed to put in place the vital national framework required to enable various cities to take action on air pollution in their own areas.
At a minimum I would expect Government to:
A national diesel vehicle scrappage scheme given the impact current Vehicle Excise Duty (VED) incentives have had on increasing the number of diesel vehicles nationally, leading to increases in NOx levels.
Restructure, maintain and expand fiscal incentives (e.g. VED, the OLEV plug-in car and van grant etc) to support the cleanest vehicles and to encourage the use of ultra-low emission technologies, particularly taxis.
Deliver a national Clean Air Zones framework to minimise duplication and costs to cities tackling air pollution (e.g. through a Euro 6 retrofit accreditation scheme).
Promote consumer awareness. For example, France has developed a low emission vehicle vignette scheme so consumers can understand how polluting vehicles are. A similar UK scheme would support cities in implementing CAZ measures.
Lead the effort to ensure the Euro 6 Standard actually delivers the expected emissions benefits in the real world through rigorous vehicle testing standards and making sure this is implemented effectively in the UK to allow consumers to buy with confidence.
Support a robust National Emissions Ceiling Directive, with binding targets in 2020, 2025 and 2030 and with methane included in the scope of the directive. Air Pollution (2) Question No: 2016/2037 Leonie Cooper Please provide more detail on the significance of your becoming an "interested party" in the case currently being brought before the Supreme Court by Client Earth?
The Mayor
I am named as an Interested Party in the judicial review brought by Client Earth against the Government's air quality action plan, submitted to the European Commission at the end of last year. Given the vital importance of the current air quality challenges faced by London, I think it only appropriate I participate in the case.
Being an interested party means I can highlight the need for further Government action that - when combined with additional action I am prepared to take - could bring forward compliance and/or reduce the exposure of London's population to harmful nitrogen dioxide (NO2) emissions.
Air Pollution (3) Question No: 2016/2038 Leonie Cooper When you provide a witness statement to the Supreme Court, will you highlight the use of dust suppressants by the previous Mayoral administration and the way in which - in my view - they were used to give a false impression of the level of emissions at key locations?
The Mayor
The witness statement has already been submitted and did not refer to the use of dust suppressants by the previous Mayor. However, I share your view that we need to take robust action addresses the root causes of air pollution and in my own proposed package of new air quality measures I have focused on big impact interventions like an expanded Ultra Low emission Zone, a transformation of the TfL bus fleet and the T-charge to give an early signal to Londoners about the need to move away from more polluting fuels like diesel. Air Pollution (4) Question No: 2016/2039 Leonie Cooper I warmly welcome your commitment to engage with all interested parties in Europe to ensure we get the very strongest regulations possible to ensure cars driven in London are subject to testing in real world driving conditions. At the UK level, will you meet with Rory Stewart the relevant Minister, to impress on him the need for national government to do its bit in Europe to tackle our toxic air?
The Mayor
Almost half of the health effects associated with exposure to air pollution are caused by transboundary pollution so it is essential strong coordinated action is taken at the European level. My team have already raised the importance of a strong National Emissions Ceiling Directive directly with Rory Stewart and I will continue to make representations on other matters, including ensuring that the new Euro standard engine testing arrangements for vehicles are fit for purpose.
Air Pollution (5) Question No: 2016/2040 Leonie Cooper What steps will you take to tackle the illegal removal of diesel particulate filters in the capital?
The Mayor
The current London Low Emission Zone (LEZ) requires older heavy diesel vehicles to have a diesel particulate filter, which is subject to an annual Driver and Vehicles Standards Agency (DVSA) inspection.
Enforcement on this issue is part of the role of the DVSA, either through the annual MOT test or roadside spot-checks by examiners. Older heavy vehicles driving in London that have had a failed inspection or no inspection at all are subject to paying the LEZ daily charge.
The TfL-funded Commercial Vehicle Unit carries out visual inspection of exhaust emissions and reports offending vehicles. However, the removal of a diesel particulate filter (DPF) is very difficult to detect on the road side without a pit and various specialist testing equipment. TfL also conducts roadworthiness testing for taxi and private hire vehicles through the licensing process (which supplants the MOT test).
It is likely DPF removal would only be done on older vehicles where the high price of a replacement is a barrier. However, we do not know whether DPF removal is an issue in the UK as data is limited, particularly for smaller vehicles. Thankfully there are no benefits to the driver in fuel savings or performance, only in repair costs for a faulty system, so occurrences are likely to be limited. Cold Homes Question No: 2016/2041 Leonie Cooper Thank you for your answer to MQ 2016/1425 on the need to tackle cold homes in London. In your answer you referenced pre-payment meters. Do you have any statistics on the number of Londoners currently on pre-payment meters in London?
The Mayor
Data on the number of Londoners currently on pre-payment meters is not available. To give an indication, however, 16 per cent of electricity customers and 15 per cent of gas customers in England are on pre-payment meters.
Food Waste Question No: 2016/2042 Leonie Cooper How many London boroughs currently collect food waste and how will you seek to increase this number?
The Mayor
There are currently 23 London boroughs that collect food waste.
I am working closely with the London Waste and Recycling Board to increase food waste recycling. Under the Resource London programme, the following activities are working to boost food waste recycling:
- New grant funding is available to increase the capture of unavoidable food waste through tried and tested communication interventions. Currently 9 boroughs are signed up.
- Service reviews - which consider food waste collections, are designed to support boroughs to develop and manage their services with the goal to increase recycling performance.
- Love Food Hate Waste and Recycle for London - London wide behavioural change campaigns designed to reduce food waste and promote recycling of unavoidable food waste. C40 Steering Committee Question No: 2016/2043 Leonie Cooper Thank you for your answer to MQ 2016/1435. It's great to learn of the bid to join the C40 steering committee as a full voting member. What benefits do you anticipate this will bring to London, in particular to London's reputation as a leader in tackling climate change?
The Mayor
As you know, London was the founder of the C40 Cities Network and ever since its inception London has been at the fore front of C40 activity. The benefits that this brings London include collaboration with other megacities, knowledge sharing and access to funding streams.
The additional benefits from being a steering committee member will include reputation and the ability to steer the direction of the network.
Low Carbon Economy Question No: 2016/2044 Leonie Cooper What steps will you take to support London's low carbon economy?
The Mayor
As stated in my manifesto, I will work to establish London as a leader in low-carbon innovation and industry by establishing a stronger low carbon policy framework and an extensive portfolio of climate change programmes that together will create market opportunities for businesses and jobs for Londoners in this sector.
I will work with the London Sustainable Development Commission (LSDC) to understand the type and nature of support that London's low carbon businesses need to flourish in this growing market. This will include developing the LSDC's London Cleantech Cluster concept aimed at establishing London as a world leader in cleantech.
And to ensure that London is well placed to continue leading the world in new low-carbon technologies and industries, creating the jobs and businesses of the future, I will support London's younger generations, through programmes such as the Low Carbon Entrepreneur, to tackle our important environmental challenges and in so doing create the businesses and jobs of the future. Biodiversity Question No: 2016/2045 Leonie Cooper Will you consider mandating new developments in London to have bird and bat boxes as well as insect hotels in order to support biodiversity in the capital?
The Mayor
Current London Plan policy includes policies that encourage developers to incorporate such features, alongside others elements of 'urban greening' (such as green roofs and sustainable drainage) that can support biodiversity.
In the forthcoming review of the London Plan I shall explore how policy and advice can be strengthened to ensure that all new developments include more features that help to ensure that all Londoners have more contact with the natural environment close to where they live and work.
Animal Welfare Question No: 2016/2046 Leonie Cooper What steps will you take to support animal welfare in London?
The Mayor
I have committed in my manifesto to provide the Met's Wildlife Crime Unit with the resources it needs to be effective.
I will ensure that my budget includes provisions for this unit to continue its important work. I am proud that London hosts the only police service with a dedicated Wildlife Crime Unit and I will support their work as Mayor.
Zero Carbon Homes (1) Question No: 2016/2047 Leonie Cooper Will London Zero Carbon Homes offset funds be ring fenced by boroughs to only direct investment into low carbon initiatives?
The Mayor
Yes. In line with current London Plan policy 5.2 (E) any cash in lieu contribution generated from carbon dioxide off-setting is to be ring fenced by the local planning authority to secure delivery of carbon dioxide savings elsewhere in the borough. Zero Carbon Homes (2) Question No: 2016/2048 Leonie Cooper How many zero carbon homes do you estimate will be constructed in London by 2020?
The Mayor
At this stage, it is not possible to estimate how many zero carbon homes will be constructed by 2020. The target to achieve zero carbon homes will apply through the planning system from October 2016.
Zero Carbon Homes (3) Question No: 2016/2049 Leonie Cooper When do you estimate that the London Plan Zero Carbon Homes policy will be extended to non-residential development in London?
The Mayor
London Plan policy 5.2 anticipates that non-residential development in London will be zero carbon from 2019.
Zero Carbon Homes (4) Question No: 2016/2050 Leonie Cooper How much funding do you estimate will be raised by the London Plan zero carbon offset policy to invest in low carbon initiatives by the year 2020?
The Mayor
In line with my response to your question 2016/2048, it is not possible to estimate the funding to be raised by the London Plan zero carbon offset policy by 2020 as the level of contribution is negotiated by boroughs on a scheme by scheme basis.
I can confirm that to date, in line with the London Plan 35% carbon dioxide reduction target, the London boroughs have collected £4,406,837 with a further £13,106,500 secured through s106 planning agreements. Nearly Zero Energy Buildings by 2020 Question No: 2016/2051 Leonie Cooper Will you be look to issue guidance to developers on the forthcoming Nearly Zero Energy Buildings by 2020 target?
The Mayor
The Nearly Zero Energy Buildings standard is likely to be reflected in the national Building Regulations. Once these are published, I will review their appropriateness to delivery my ambitions for a zero carbon city.
RE:NEW (1) Question No: 2016/2052 Leonie Cooper Can the RE:NEW team provide an update on the number of homes in London provided with an energy efficiency retrofit over the period January 2015 to May 2016?
The Mayor
Between 1 January 2015 and 31 May 2016 this phase of the RE:NEW programme supported organisations to contract for c14,500 home retrofits.
In addition to these homes between 1 January and 31 December 2015 (the latest date for which figures are available), an additional 30,300 homes were retrofitted in London through the main subsidised schemes (eg the energy company obligation and the feed in tariff)
RE:NEW (2) Question No: 2016/2053 Leonie Cooper Will you undertake an independent review of the latest round of the RE:NEW programme? The latest review of Capita's work on the programme was undertaken by Capita.
The Mayor
Yes, I am planning to undertake an independent review of this phase of the RE:NEW programme. Toxic Air and Europe Question No: 2016/2054 Leonie Cooper I would like to welcome your joint letter with the Mayor of Paris calling for stricter European targets for emission reduction. Following the press reports that the UK government lobbied against new proposals to halve the number of air pollution deaths in 15 years, how will you seek to convince Ministers to be constructive at a European and national level, in tackling our toxic air?
The Mayor
Both Paris and London suffer from very high levels of transboundary pollution from other parts of the EU so it was essential that Mayor Hidalgo and I work together to ensure that tough emission limits are adopted for all European countries as part of the National Emissions Ceiling Directive.
I share your disappointment about the role of the UK Government in seeking to weaken this important piece of legislation, despite my representations. I will continue to engage with ministers to explain that air pollution causes the equivalent of nearly 10,000 deaths in London each year and that urgent local, national and European action is required to tackle this public health issue.
Central Line to Ongar Question No: 2016/2055 Tom Copley Will you ask TfL to conduct a feasibility study and negotiate with Essex County Council into running the Central Line out to Ongar again considering the line remains intact and that there is new development there?
The Mayor
TfL would be happy to co-operate with Essex County Council or others who wish to consider the likely demand for this service and the feasibility of this suggestion in more detail.
Rough Sleeping Group Question No: 2016/2056 Tom Copley Do you plan to continue the Mayor's Rough Sleeping Group and what changes if any do you plan to make to it?
The Mayor
I certainly plan to work closely with boroughs and voluntary sector organisation to tackle rough sleeping in London and I am currently in talking to them about the best way to organise that vital work. Housing Authorities accepting Domestic Abuse victims Question No: 2016/2057 Tom Copley Please can you provide me with the number of occasions where local authorities accepted i) individuals and ii) families into emergency council housing on the grounds of domestic abuse over last 4 years? Please provide this information per borough in excel format.
The Mayor
Information on the number of households who local authorities accepted a duty to accommodate under the homelessness legislation is reported to Government quarterly by boroughs. Data is available, for each local authority in England, in section E3 of the table 'Detailed local authority homeless figures'.
These tables can be accessed at https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/live- tables-on-homelessness. The data that identifies the number of households made homeless by domestic abuse does not differentiate different household types.
Homelessness after Domestic Abuse Question No: 2016/2058 Tom Copley Please can you provide me with the number of i) homeless women and ii) homeless men in London who cited domestic violence or domestic abuse as a contributing factor to their homelessness over last 5 years. Please provide this per Borough and per year, in excel format.
The Mayor
The information that comes closest to this is the data outlined in the response to MQ 2057 / 2016. LGBT Domestic Abuse - Broken Rainbow Question No: 2016/2059 Tom Copley Earlier this year LGBT Domestic Abuse charity 'Broken Rainbow' was almost closed permanently, due to lack of sustainable funding. What will you do as Mayor to ensure that organisations who support LGBT victims of domestic abuse in London are sustainably funded?
The Mayor
Domestic and Sexual abuse are key priorities for London, my ambition is to improve the response to survivors of these crimes. I will be addressing these important issues within our new Police and Crime Plan. At this point we will consider carefully our approach to the commissioning of services, working with both victims, communities and our providers.
I am concerned about the potential loss of services provided by the LGBT Domestic Abuse Charity 'Broken Windows' and as a current funder of the LGBT service Gallop, I am pleased that they are able to continue the excellent work started by Broken Windows, by offering to run the helpline for survivors of domestic abuse.
Supported Housing Question No: 2016/2060 Tom Copley Please can you provide me with the number of a) local councils and b) Housing Associations who provide supported housing in housing and c) the number of housing units that were supplied by them in the years 2010 - 2015? Please provide this information per year, in excel format.
The Mayor
Please note: Information for 2010-11 was managed by the HCA. We do not hold data of (a) and (b)
2011- 2012- 2013- 2014- 2015- Grand
12 13 14 15 16 Total Supported housing units by boroughs 47 0 54 185 119 405 Supported housing units by housing 1,014 504 424 1,304 394 3,640 associations Total 1,061 504 478 1,489 513 4,045 Details are based on programmes operated by the HCA or GLA only Temporary Accommodation (1) Question No: 2016/2061 Tom Copley Please can you provide me with i) the number of individuals housed in temporary accommodation and b) the number of families housed in temporary accommodation per London Borough per year over the last 5 years? Please provide this information in Excel format.
The Mayor
Information on the number of households who local authorities placed in temporary accommodation is reported to Government quarterly by boroughs. It is available, for each local authority in England, in section E5 of the table 'Detailed local authority homeless figures'.
These tables are available at https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/live- tables-on-homelessness for all quarters since the start of 2012/13. Data on the number of households placed in temporary accommodation during each quarter does not differentiate different household types. This distinction is drawn in data on the total number of households in temporary accommodation at the end of each quarter, which is available in section E6 of the same table.
Temporary Accommodation (1) Question No: 2016/2062 Tom Copley Please can you provide me with the annual cost per financial year to every London Borough for temporary re-housing over the last 5 years? Please provide this information in Excel format.
The Mayor
This information is not available, although the following sources may prove useful:
Julie Rugg, of York University's Centre for Housing Policy, recently completed a study, commissioned by London Councils, in which she sought to calculate this expenditure during 2014/15. This is available at https://www.york.ac.uk/chp/expertise/homelessness/cost- temp-accom/
24housing also calculated the cost over the last 18 months on the basis of responses to Freedom of Information requests. Its conclusions are available at http://www.24dash.com/news/housing/2016-05-27-London-councils-near-500m-spending- on-temporary-accommodation
Finally, the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) routinely reports on local authority spending on temporary accommodation. Committee Investigation on Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Question No: 2016/2063 Tom Copley Will you take forward the recommendations of the 2014/15 Housing Committee investigation on Gypsy and Traveller accommodation?
The Mayor
I will consider these recommendations as part of the full review of the London Plan.
Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation (1) Question No: 2016/2064 Tom Copley Will you support an interpretation of the Planning Policy for Travellers Sites definition of Travellers which acknowledges that the majority of Gypsies and Travellers in the capital, (both on Traveller sites and in housing), now classed as 'settled' still have a need for culturally suitable caravan site accommodation which has to be met through identifying land for sites?
The Mayor
As part of the full review of the London Plan, I will consider the implications of the new national planning policy and your suggested definition.
Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation (2) Question No: 2016/2065 Tom Copley Will the London Plan evidence base (SHMA) include the accommodation needs of all Gypsies and Travellers (within or outside the planning definition) in line with recent DCLG guidance?
The Mayor
The government's 2015 'Planning Policy for Traveller Sites' states that "local planning authorities should make their own assessment of need for the purposes of planning".
Given the highly localised distribution of gypsy and traveller communities in London and the need for close and effective engagement with local communities (both settled and traveller) in preparing these assessments, I agree that London boroughs are best placed to carry them out, and I encourage them to do so, including jointly commissioning research where appropriate. Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation (3) Question No: 2016/2066 Tom Copley Will you reinstate the Traveller Pitch Fund and work pro-actively with local authorities and Gypsy and Traveller communities to secure successful bids for delivering new sites?
The Mayor
Bids for funding for Gypsy and Traveller pitches can be made to the GLA's affordable housing programme, and I encourage anyone considering such a bid to contact the GLA to discuss it.
Emissions from river traffic (1) Question No: 2016/2067 Unmesh Desai Is there a case for DEFRA to update its latest analysis on maritime emissions, which was last fully assessed in 2009?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
The UK National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory (NAEI) is compiled annually by Ricardo-AEA on behalf of the Government. The NAEI is used to report to the European Commission and other organisations under mechanisms such as the National Emission Ceiling Directive, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Emissions calculations are updated each year to take account of improved methodologies and data inputs. As a result, shipping emissions calculations are considered to meet current reporting requirements. Emissions from river traffic (2) Question No: 2016/2068 Unmesh Desai What proportion of London's emissions currently come from river transport?
The Mayor
The London Atmospheric Emissions Inventory (LAEI) indicates that in 2013 the proportions of emissions due to shipping are as follows:
NOx - 1 per cent across the Greater London Authority and 4 per cent in central London
PM10 - 1 per cent across the Greater London Authority and 3 per cent in central London.
CO2 - less than 1 per cent across the Greater London Authority and 1 per cent for Central London.
The LAEI 2013 can be found on the London Datastore here: http://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/london-atmospheric-emissions-inventory-2013
Emissions from river traffic (3) Question No: 2016/2069 Unmesh Desai What are the primary emissions that come from river transport and how are they regulated?
The Mayor
River transport on the Thames is predominately powered by diesel engines and so, like road transport, the primary emissions are carbon dioxide (CO2), particulate matter (PM), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrocarbons (HC).
Engines sold to power river transport are currently subject to Stage III A Inland Waterway Vessels Emissions limits which, like the Euro standards for road going vehicles, set maximum levels for PM, NOx, CO and HC. Emissions from canal boats Question No: 2016/2070 Unmesh Desai What are the primary emissions that come from canal boats and what powers do you have to encourage the development of cleaner boats?
The Mayor
Canal boats are predominately powered by diesel engines and so like road transport, the primary emissions from combustion of this fuel are carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbons (HC), particulate matter (PM), and oxides of nitrogen (NOx) in rough order of their volume. The engine may also act as a generator where there is no shore power supply.
Many canal boats will also have a solid fuel fire for heating, which could emit many of the same pollutants. Both the engine and the fire on a canal boat will need to comply with the Clean Air Act, which prevents the emission of 'dark smoke'.
Additionally many moorings in London have rules ensuring that shore power supply is used where it is available. Whilst I have no direct powers I will look into what can be done to encourage the use of alternative fuels and cleaner power on London's canals with London boroughs through initiatives such as the Air Quality Fund.
LR extension to Dagenham Dock Question No: 2016/2071 Unmesh Desai Improved access to the Royal Docks is a key concern in the City & East constituency. In light of the previous Mayor's decision to cancel the proposed DLR extension to Dagenham Dock, can the Mayor commit to re-examining this proposal?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
The London Overground extension from Barking to Barking Riverside is now the proposed scheme to unlock 10,800 homes at Barking Riverside, providing fast connections to Barking, the City, Stratford and the West End. It will also maximise the regeneration of the London Riverside Opportunity Area within which Barking Riverside is located. This scheme is fully funded. The Overground extension does not, however, preclude the DLR extension at a future date, if the scheme were demonstrated to be affordable and funding could be identified. London City Airport and Crossrail Question No: 2016/2072 Unmesh Desai Will you agree to review the decision by your predecessor not to support a fully privately financed Crossrail Station at London City Airport?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
My focus is on the delivery of the Elizabeth line on time and within budget. I understand that London City Airport is yet to submit a formal proposal to TfL but may do so later this year. I look forward to understanding the output of that work.
Blacklisting Question No: 2016/2073 Unmesh Desai You have talked about tacking "unacceptable practices such as blacklisting". Councils such as Barking & Dagenham, Newham and Tower Hamlets have policies in place to ensure that contract compliance policies include reference to this. Will you ensure the GLA also implements this at all levels?
The Mayor
Blacklisting is unlawful under The Employment Relations Act 1999 (Blacklists) Regulations 2010 and any contractor who breaches those Regulations can be deemed ineligible under procurement regulation to bid for the GLA's contracts. The GLA will invoke this legislation where appropriate to ensure it does not contract with organisations who engage in blacklisting.
Bobby Moore Question No: 2016/2074 Unmesh Desai 30th July 2016 will be the 50th anniversary of England's World Cup win. I recently attended the inaugural showing of "Bo66by - The Movie" sponsored by Barking and Dagenham Council and attended by Roberta Moore, daughter of the late Bobby Moore. She joined Council Leader, Darren Rodwell, in launching a national appeal to raise funding for a statue- to be known as the People's Statue- in his honour to be situated in Barking, his hometown. Will you support and consider ways to publicise the appeal?
The Mayor
I will ask my officers to look at this in more detail. Radicalisation in Prisons Question No: 2016/2075 Unmesh Desai What meetings or correspondence have you had with the Justice Secretary or other parties regarding the very worrying reports of radicalisation at Belmarsh prison?
The Mayor
I am very concerned about reports of radicalisation at HMP Belmarsh and will be seeking a meeting with the Justice Secretary. As I have said in the press, more needs to be done to de- radicalise and rehabilitate extremists and to make sure that other prisoners do not come out of prison radicalised. I am committed to working with partners to tackle this issue.
My Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime will be considering this issue, and the issue of preventing radicalisation more broadly, as part of the development of my Police and Crime Plan.
Knife Crime with Injury Figures Question No: 2016/2076 1 Attachments Unmesh Desai Please provide in an excel format Knife Crime with Injury Broken down by Borough and by month from April 2014 to date.
The Mayor
Please find attached as Appendix B the requested information regarding knife crime with injury. Please note that knife crime with injury is counted per victim rather than offence.
Knife Crime with Injury under 25 Figures Question No: 2016/2077 1 Attachments Unmesh Desai Please provide in an excel format Knife Crime with Injury for under 25s broken down by Borough and by month from April 2014 to date.
The Mayor
Please find attached as Appendix C the requested information regarding knife crime with injury where the victim is aged less than 25 years old. This is a count of all victims aged 1- 24, including those that were victims of domestic abuse related knife crime. Please note that knife crime with injury is counted per victim rather than offence. Disability Hate Crime Question No: 2016/2078 Unmesh Desai There was a significant increase of 135% in Disability Hate crime in the rolling 12 months May14-Apr15, May15-Apr16 in London. What assessment have you made of this shocking rise?
The Mayor
I am concerned about any increases in hate crime. We know however, that hate crime has historically been under-reported and that this is especially true of disability hate crime.
In February the MPS and community partners launched the 'Disability Hate Crime Matters' initiative, providing briefings to frontline officers to ensure disability hate crime is recognised, properly recorded, and gets the response it requires. This has seen a far higher number of disability hate crime reports captured than would previously have been the case.
I have pledged to direct the MPS to take a zero-tolerance approach to hate crime, including disability hate crime. The development of my Police and Crime Plan will present an opportunity to hear more from communities and partner agencies about how we can work together to effectively tackle hate crime.
Operation Viper Question No: 2016/2079 Unmesh Desai What is the Metropolitan Police Service doing to ensure that Operation Viper tactics will not unfairly stigmatise and alienate members of the London's BAME communities in the Boroughs of Lambeth, Southwark, Barnet, Haringey and Croydon?
The Mayor
Operation Viber is the MPS response to address the increases in gun crime in London. They are targeted operations, where additional police presence and enforcement is deployed to specific London locations based on police intelligence.
In advance of this deployment a community/equality impact assessment is carried out to review the impact of additional police presence or enforcement action.
This assessment is fully supported by the local borough police team, and engagement takes place with statutory services, independent advisory groups and community/resident groups as deemed appropriate and relevant to each operation. Counter - Terrorism Review Question No: 2016/2080 Unmesh Desai When will you be able to share the terms of reference for Lord Harris' review into counter- terrorism in London?
The Mayor
Lord Harris has already written to Assembly Members enclosing the terms of reference for his review.
Body Worn Cameras Question No: 2016/2081 Unmesh Desai Are the MPS still reviewing their use of Body Worn Cameras? Is there any evidence of the impact of their use on policing in London? Can you share any reports or evidence that has been gathered so far?
The Mayor
In November 2015, MOPAC and the College Of Policing produced a report outlining results of a year-long trial of the usage of approximately 500 cameras by Emergency Response Officers in 10 MPS Boroughs (see link below): www.college.police.uk/News/College-news/.../BWV%20report%20Nov%202015.pdf
The findings were:
Body Worn Video (BWV) reduced the number of allegations against officers
No overall impact of BWV on number or type of stop & searches
It did not affect proportion of arrests for violent crime
No evidence that BWV changed the way police dealt with victims/suspects
MOPAC's Public Attitude Survey during this period found residents supportive of BWV.
The MPS BWV Project Team is constantly reviewing the use of the cameras by its officers in these pilots, prior to commencement of full roll out by end summer 2016.
An example of this is supporting a National Armed policing pilot of BWV, and to this end have a number of cameras issued to MPS Firearms Units. This pilot reports via the National Police Chiefs Council (NPCC). Recruitment to the Met (1) Question No: 2016/2082 Unmesh Desai How many new officers were recruited to the MPS in 2013/14, 2014/15 and 2015/16?
The Mayor
Please see the table below.
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 New Recruits (all PCs) 2,119.86 3,064.80 1,545.00
Recruitment to the Met (2) Question No: 2016/2083 Unmesh Desai Of the new officers recruited to the MPS in 2013/14, 2014/15 and 2015/16 how many live in London?
The Mayor
Please see the table below.
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 New Recruits with a London address 1,308.20 1,824.00 1,029.00 The London residency criteria was introduced on 1 August
Diversity in Recruitment (1) Question No: 2016/2084 Unmesh Desai Of the new recruits to the Metropolitan Police Service in 2014/15 and 2015/16 how many and what percentage are of a BAME background?
The Mayor
Please see the table below.
2014-15 2015-16 Overall New Recruits 3064.80 1545.00 BAME New Recruits 498.00 406.00 % BAME 16.2% 26.3%
Diversity in Recruitment (2) Question No: 2016/2085 Unmesh Desai Of the new recruits to the Metropolitan Police Service in 2014/15 and 2015/16 how many and what percentage are female?
The Mayor
Please see the table below.
2014-15 2015-16 Overall New Recruits 3064.80 1545.00 Female New Recruits 873.80 468.00 % Female 28.5% 30.3%
Diversity in Recruitment (3) Question No: 2016/2086 Unmesh Desai Of the new officers recruited to the MPS in 2014/15 and 2015/16 who live in London, how many are from a BAME background?
The Mayor
Please see the table below.
2014-15 2015-16 Overall New Recruits (London) 1824.00 1029.00 BAME New Recruits (London 390.00 338.00 % BAME (London) 21.4% 32.8%
Diversity in Recruitment (4) Question No: 2016/2087 Unmesh Desai Of the new officers recruited to the MPS in 2014/15 and 2015/16 who live in London, how many are female?
The Mayor
Please see the table below.
2014-15 2015-16 Overall New Recruits (London) 1824.00 1029.00 Female New Recruits (London) 540.00 315.00 % Female (London) 29.6% 30.6%
Diversity in the Met (5) Question No: 2016/2088 Unmesh Desai Of the new recruits in 2013/14, 2014/15 and 2015/16 how many and what percentage had previously been PCSOs?
The Mayor
Please see the table below.
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 New Recruits 2119.86 3,064.80 1,545.00 Former PCSOs 439.66 116.00 38.00 % Former PCSOs 20.7% 3.8% 2.5%
Diversity in Recruitment (6) Question No: 2016/2089 Unmesh Desai Of the new recruits in 2013/14, 2014/15 and 2015/16 who had previously been a PCSO how many and what percentage are from a BAME background?
The Mayor
Please see the table below.
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 All Former PCSOs 439.66 116.00 38.00 BAME Former PCSOs 90.66 32.00 12.00 % BAME Former PCSOs 20.6% 27.6% 31.6%
Diversity in Recruitment (7) Question No: 2016/2090 Unmesh Desai Of the new recruits in 2013/14, 2014/15 and 2015/16 who had previously been a PCSO how many and what percentage are female?
The Mayor
Please see the table below.
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 All Former PCSOs 439.66 116.00 38.00 Female Former PCSOs 128.66 28.00 10.00 % Female Former PCSOs 29.3% 24.1% 26.3%
Drug and Alcohol Related Crime Question No: 2016/2091 Unmesh Desai What percentage of notifiable offences in 2015/16 was recorded as 'drug or alcohol related'?
The Mayor
The Metropolitan Police Service recorded 4.8% of Total Notifiable Offences as containing a feature code related to either drugs or alcohol during the financial year 2015/16. Diversity in the Met Question No: 2016/2092 Unmesh Desai What percentage and what number of current MPS officers, PCSOs and Staff are of a BAME background?
The Mayor
Please see the table below.
Overall BAME % BAME Police Officer 31,601.41 3,986.97 12.6% Police Staff 9,410.64 2,341.38 24.9% PCSO 1,565.56 570.67 36.5%
Diversity in the Met (2) Question No: 2016/2093 Unmesh Desai What percentage and what number of current MPS officers, PCSOs and Staff are female?
The Mayor
Please see the table below.
Overall Female % Female Police Officer 31,601.41 8,174.70 25.9% Police Staff 9,410.64 5,346.54 56.8% PCSO 1,565.56 571.67 36.5%
Taser Use Question No: 2016/2094 Unmesh Desai How many officers across the MPS are trained in the use of Taser?
Please break this information down by borough.
The Mayor
There are currently 4044 Taser trained officers, though this number does fluctuate. The majority of these officers are deployed in specialist commands: Armed commands 2151
Territorial Support Group 371
SCO8 Trident 58
SO15 Counter Terrorim Command 7
Marine Support unit 1
For those officers in the boroughs the breakdown is as follows:
BOCU Current No. NEWHAM 52 CITY OF WESTMINSTER 51 HACKNEY 48 WANDSWORTH 53 LEWISHAM 51 WALTHAM FOREST 52 HAMERSMITH & FULHAM 47 BARKING & DAGENHAM 39 CROYDON 47 HARROW 46 GREENWICH 46 HILLINGDON 47 SOUTHWARK 48 ISLINGTON 45 LAMBETH 48 SUTTON 48 HARINGEY 47 ENFIELD 43 BROMLEY 41 CAMDEN 45 BEXLEY 45 RICHMOND-UPON-THAMES 44 BRENT 44 EALING 46 KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA 41 REDBRIDGE 47 HOUNSLOW 43 TOWER HAMLETS 43 BARNET 41 HAVERING 39 KINGSTON-UPON-THAMES 39 MERTON 40 TOTAL 1456
Taser Use Question No: 2016/2095 Unmesh Desai Has the MPS reached its target of 40 officers in every borough trained in the use of Taser?
The Mayor
With the exception of Barking & Dagenham, Havering and Kingston Upon Thames, which each have 39, all London boroughs have 40 or more Taser trained officers.
Taser Use Question No: 2016/2096 Unmesh Desai How many and which boroughs have more than 40 officers trained in the use of Taser?
The Mayor
Please see my response to MQ 2016 / 2096. Firearms Use Question No: 2016/2097 Unmesh Desai How many officers were trained firearms users in the years 2012/13, 2013/14, 2014/15 and 2015/16?
The Mayor
The number of trained firearms officers for each year is shown in the table below.
Year Number of firearms officers 2012/2013 2314 2013/2014 2155 2014/2015 2122
2015/2016 2139
Stonegrove Regeneration Edgware Question No: 2016/2098 Andrew Dismore Earlier this year, after an intervention by your predecessor and a site visit with myself and a GLA officer to this part-GLA funded project, various promises were made by the developers, Baratts, and by the housing association Family Mosaic to us on behalf of the tenants, over poor management and maintenance issues. I regret to say that those promises in large part have not been met, and in some respects maintenance has got worse, yet the service charges have been increased. Will you also intervene on behalf of these hard done by residents, to pressure Barratts and Family Mosaic to meet their responsibilities without further delay or prevarication?
The Mayor
I am sorry to hear that the situation on the Stonegrove Estate is still not satisfactory for some residents.
My officers have contacted Family Mosaic and Barratt again and understand that Family Mosaic is writing to update you on all the issues raised since February. There was a meeting with concerned residents to explain the new service charge structure on 25th May and follow up is planned, which my officers will closely monitor. West Hampstead fire station Question No: 2016/2099 Andrew Dismore At West Hampstead fire station there are four unoccupied houses that need refurbishment. Do you agree that it would be a good idea to bring them back into use for key worker housing for firefighters at a London living rent?
The Mayor
A report was presented to LFEPA's Resources Committee on 10 March 2016 setting out options for the future of the cottages at West Hampstead. Members of the committee recognised that the shortage of affordable housing in London, especially for key workers, including firefighters, is an important consideration in the future of the cottages.
I have asked officers to follow up on whether this option may represent the best way forward
West Hendon regeneration Question No: 2016/2100 Andrew Dismore Will you review the GLA involvement and consents given to this scheme, to see if anything can be done better to respect the remaining residents' rights, in line with your manifesto; and insofar as future consents are required, will you ensure that residents' rights are fully recognised and protected?
The Mayor
I am clear that any new regeneration schemes brought forward in the future should only take place where certain standards are met, in particular in relation to residents' involvement, engagement and rights.
I will be working with boroughs and others to develop these standards. In terms of this particular scheme, I will ask my team to discuss the GLA's role directly with you.
Grahame Park regeneration Question No: 2016/2101 Andrew Dismore Will you review the GLA involvement and consents given to this scheme, to see if anything can be done better to respect the remaining residents' rights, in line with your manifesto; and insofar as future consents are required, will you ensure that residents' rights are fully recognised and protected?
The Mayor
Please see my response to MQ 2016 /2100. Barnet planning decisions and affordable homes Question No: 2016/2102 Andrew Dismore Will you hold an investigation into Barnet Council's major planning decision making, which has underprovided affordable homes in a large number of major schemes, especially focussing on 'viability'?
The Mayor
While there may well be instances across London, where boroughs have not negotiated hard enough for affordable housing, I would prefer to look forward rather than backwards and to that end have instructed my planning officers to produce new planning guidance to shine a light on the opaque world of viability assessments, strengthening my ability to deliver more affordable housing.
Barnet planning decisions and Mill Hill East Question No: 2016/2103 Andrew Dismore Will you hold an investigation into Barnet planning decisions at Mill Hill East, which has allowed implementation of planning consent to be spun out, so that it will be many years before the scheme is completed, with continuing rise in prices as a result?
The Mayor
As you will be aware, the grants of planning permission do not usually require schemes to be implemented within particular timeframes. However, s106 agreements can include a requirement to review affordable housing provision to ensure any rise in prices makes a contribution to additional affordable housing provision. Mount Pleasant Question No: 2016/2104 Andrew Dismore Will you review the GLA involvement and consents given to this scheme, to see if anything can be done to improve the scheme, particularly with a view to increasing the number of affordable homes?
The Mayor
In relation to the approved scheme, I am not in a position to recover or review a previous Mayoral decision. Most pertinently, a judicial review against the previous decision was rejected by the Courts and the decision was found to be sound.
In relation to affordable housing, I note that application includes two review mechanisms that would revisit the viability of the scheme, to establish if there is scope to deliver more affordable housing.
I also note that if a revised application were to be submitted in the future, then I would be consulted, depending on the scale of development.
Probate fees Question No: 2016/2105 Andrew Dismore The Government has been consulting on a rise in probate fees which would see an increase on estates worth £2million from £188 to £20,000. What do you consider the impact of this will be on Londoners, where the value of estates is much higher than in the rest of the country due to property values; and will you make representations about it to the Ministry of Justice?
The Mayor
In principle I support the government's proposed reforms which would eliminate probate fees for many more estates by raising the value threshold to £50,000, while ensuring that higher fees are charged on more valuable estates but with the fee never exceeding 1% of the total value.
However, I also realise that because of London's higher property values, the higher fees will disproportionately affect Londoners. I will monitor the situation closely and make representations to the Government at the appropriate time. Non EU migrants living in London Question No: 2016/2106 Andrew Dismore The Government have moved the goalposts for non EU migrants living in the UK, which will disproportionally affect those living London. From this year , non-EEA workers will need to earn at least £35,000 to settle in the UK for longer than six years unless they are working in a PhD- level occupation or a job which is on the Shortage Occupation List. Will you make representations to both the Home Secretary and Immigration Minister over the new legislation, so that those who came to settle in London under the then rules are not disadvantaged by an ex post facto rule change? http://news.sky.com/story/1698985/oz-anger-at-visa-changes-for-non-eu-workers https://player.vimeo.com/video/162272132?autoplay=1
The Mayor
I value the important contribution of Alyson Frazierk and many others who have come to London to study and work. This is a great city for creative, talented people from around the world and they enrich the lives of all Londoners. It is important that Tier 2 supports the growth of London's creative sector.
The settlement pay threshold changes were introduced in April 2016. I am unable to comment on individual cases but will ask my officers to review the impact of the changes on London.
Economy Committee High Streets report Question No: 2016/2107 Andrew Dismore Will you reconsider the recommendations of the Economy Committee High Streets report in the last Assembly term, to see which you can support and implement with particular reference to a level playing field for traders in competition with charity shops, controlling the number of gambling premises, and open and available lists of landlords?
The Mayor
Boroughs are now better able to control the number of gambling premises since the Government amended the Planning Use Classes Order and placed betting offices/shops in the 'Sui Generis' Use Class- a move which I fully support. This means that a change of use to a betting office/shop now needs formal planning approval by the local planning authority.
I will consider the Assembly's other recommendations as part of the full review of the London Plan. Bus stops near St. Pancras Hospital Question No: 2016/2108 Andrew Dismore The removal of the bus stops on either side of the road that were closest to St. Pancras Hospital (nos. 46 and 214 buses) means that a lot of sick people have to trudge half a mile or so from the next nearest bus stop especially as the hospital also now houses a general practice that has moved from Kings Cross Road. Will you reinstate these bus stops, and if not why not?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
The plans to remove the bus stops on Pancras Road were subject to public consultation in October 2014 and led by the London Borough of Camden. It was considered that 112 metres walking distance from the nearest adjacent bus stop was reasonable. The proposals formed part of a cycling scheme to introduce protected cycle lanes. The stops were permanently removed in July 2015.
TfL recognise the balance that must be struck in meeting the needs of bus passengers as well as the benefits of providing cyclists and pedestrians with an improved and safer public space. The close proximity of the adjacent stops - while making for a slightly longer walk - ensures that bus services remain within an acceptable and accessible distance of the hospital grounds. Flooding, Courtland /A1 pedestrian subway Question No: 2016/2109 Andrew Dismore Since the tunnel was renovated it has never worked properly and it floods to at least 1 metre deep and by the marks on the floor, it must have risen to ceiling height at some point. The water has also begun to lift the tar from the surface and someone is likely to trip over it. This affects children attending the schools at Courtland Primary and Mill Hill Secondary and some have been seen jumping the A1 central barrier. What will you do to make this subway usable and to stop the flooding?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
There has been flooding at this location caused by faults to the pumps that are designed to evacuate flood water from the subway.
TfL installed a temporary pump in April as an interim measure, while new equipment was sourced to replace the electrical control system for the pumps. Due to unseasonal levels of rainfall at the end of May, the temporary pump became inundated. The control system was replaced shortly after this event and subsequently has been operating well. TfL has made the surface safe and are evaluating different materials that will better withstand the high level of pedestrian traffic.
A5 at Staples Corner Flyover Question No: 2016/2110 Andrew Dismore Will you look into the condition of the A5 at Staples Corner Flyover? A lot of vegetation is growing out of the side of the road (in both directions) which growth could cause serious damage to both the road surface and the concrete infrastructure.
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
The A5 is not on the Transport for London Road Network, so TfL has no maintenance responsibility, which falls instead to the relevant local highway authorities.
The boundary between the boroughs of Brent and Barnet runs along the centre of the carriageway at the Staples Corner Flyover, however, TfL understands that by agreement Barnet maintains the highway.
Following public complaints on conditions TfL has already contacted the borough. night tube Question No: 2016/2111 Andrew Dismore I have received a number of representations from residents living near overground stretches of tube lines and near tube stations, about the noise impact once the night tube starts. What are you doing to reduce the impact on these residents, who were not consulted by the previous mayor about the night tube scheme?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
Please also see my response to oral MQ 2815/ 2016. I am aware that London Underground's services can lead to noise concerns from some of its neighbours, and that the Night Tube could be a particular issue in some areas. This is one of the first issues my Deputy Mayor for Transport raised with the Commissioner of TfL.
I am determined that the Night Tube shouldn't mean sleepless nights. Tube trains already run for 20 hours a day, with additional trains at night, so TfL does not anticipate significantly more noise for their neighbours. However, as Mayor, I will ensure that issues that are raised are dealt with effectively and sensitively by TfL.
TfL have established a specialist group, bringing together experts from across the organisation to investigate concerns to ensure there is the comprehensive, speedy response I expect. That team includes TfL's engineers, noise and vibration experts and maintenance staff, as well as community relations specialists.
Wandsworth Council's proposals for a Nine Elms bridge Question No: 2016/2112 Andrew Dismore Are you aware of the opposition to this proposal from the residents of Pimlico on the Westminster side of the river and their Councillors, who do not see any need for a bridge and see it as a highly expensive vanity project as Chelsea Bridge and Vauxhall Bridge are nearby, and two new tube stations are being built. Will you indicate to Wandsworth Council that this proposal does not have your support?
The Mayor
I understand that residents in the Pimlico area have concerns about the proposal and the impact it could have on the local area. No further work is being undertaken by TfL at this time and it is clear that any scheme requires support from all affected authorities.
A TfL study completed in 2013 found that a pedestrian and cyclist bridge connecting Pimlico and Nine Elms was feasible and could have a strong transport case, but significant environmental and planning issues would first need to be resolved if the bridge was to progress. Bus route 13 Question No: 2016/2113 Andrew Dismore Following a consultation during March and April 2015, TfL decided not to progress any further with our proposals for changes to routes 13, 82, 113, 139 and 189 on Finchley Rd. However, they are intending to launch a new consultation in June 2016 on different proposals which include routes 13, 82, 113, 139 and 189. In view of the enormous opposition to the removal of route 13, will you confirm that route 13 is safe with you?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/09/2016
Given the constantly changing nature of London, TfL regularly reviews the strategic balance of capacity and demand across the bus network. A key part of that planning is to redistribute capacity from areas where there is too much to areas where there are crowding pressures.
Largely due to the improved service being offered on the Jubilee line, there has been a noticeable reduction in demand on bus services along Abbey Road and Finchley Road. TfL carefully considered all the comments received about the previous proposals and, in light of the feedback, has prepared a new scheme on which consultation will start shortly. Changes to route 13 will be proposed to obtain the views of local people. All views will, of course, be given very careful consideration. Pedestrianisation of Oxford Street Question No: 2016/2114 Andrew Dismore Plans to pedestrianise Oxford Street are contentious with residents north and south of Oxford Street who are concerned as to where the many buses will go and the risk of their displacement down smaller residential streets. Will you consider a range of other actions to improve air quality and increase safety such as phasing out diesel buses from routes that travel along Oxford Street, widening pavements and getting rid of street clutter, pedestrianising the side streets wherever practical and allowing cafes to set up and banning pedicabs?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
Oxford Street is London's high street, with some of the highest footfall anywhere in the capital, but it is also one of the most dangerous and polluted streets in the city. This situation cannot be allowed to continue, and the plan to pedestrianise the street will not only tackle these issues, but transform the shopping experience for millions of Londoners and visitors every year.
Local residents have genuine concerns about the impact transformational schemes like this one can have on the local area and it is, as you say, essential that any scheme successfully deals with any potentially negative impacts on local communities. The GLA, Westminster City Council and TfL are working together to ensure that the proposed changes work for visitors and residents alike and all of the measures you describe need to be assessed.
The West End Partnership (WEP) has begun work on proposals to transform Oxford Street and we will engage widely with local residents, visitors and businesses as these proposals develop. Grafton Way air pollution Question No: 2016/2115 Andrew Dismore At the moment taxis have to drive below residential windows in Grafton Way, Euston because they cannot go straight ahead, unless they want to drive down the underpass onto the Westway. This means that taxis and other vehicles queue below residential windows throughout the day which is very bad for the health of those who live there, especially those who work from home. Camden Council monitored NO2 here last year resulting in readings well over the EU legal limit. There are no residents on Euston Road where the bus lane is, only the hospital which has air filtration unlike Grafton Way residents. Will you allow taxis to drive on the (newish) bus lane on Euston Rd in front of UCH, to reduce the pollution experienced by these residents?
.
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
The original decision to not allow taxis into this bus lane was due to concerns regarding taxis picking up and setting down passengers, which could have an impact on ambulances arriving at University College Hospital (UCH).
I have asked TfL to investigate, in conjunction with the London Borough of Camden (the relevant highway authority), whether taxis should be allowed to use the bus lane on Euston Road in front of UCH. Westminster CCTV Question No: 2016/2116 Andrew Dismore What assessment of the impact have you made and what representations are you making to Westminster City Council, over their decision to switch off all their CCTV systems, including for the West End and central London?
The report can be found via the online agenda for Cabinet, item 6 (http://committees.westminster.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=130&MId=3943).
The Mayor
I am concerned over this issue and have discussed this at my regular meetings with the Commissioner.
I understand that the Westminster City Council decision was to end their contract with G4S who currently undertake the monitoring of the CCTV in the borough. The report helpfully references some capital funding which remains available to support innovative solutions.
The MPS were in touch with the City Council prior to the decision being taken and have offered to assist with relocation of where the feed from the CCTV is viewed and to work with Westminster on solutions which might allow for continued coverage on a basis which, whilst recognising WCC cost pressures, did not significantly add to those of the MPS. I am pleased that those discussions are continuing.
Police expenditure on a 'guru' Question No: 2016/2117 Andrew Dismore At a time of pressure on the Metropolitan Police budget, was it a wise investment under the previous mayor to spend £40,000 on a 'guru' to promote their austerity to their own officers?
The Mayor
The MPS is having to change its culture and the way in which it works. I understand that the engagement was part of a programme of communication and change intended to influence the thinking of all of the leaders in this organisation of some 40,000 people.
My role is to provide strategic oversight of the budget and whilst I require the MPS to use their funds efficiently and effectively, and will continue to reinforce this message; decisions about events of this sort are primarily a matter for the Commissioner. Merging borough policing Question No: 2016/2118 Andrew Dismore Do you plan to go ahead with your predecessor's scheme to merge Police Borough Command Units?
The Mayor
I want to restore real neighbourhood policing for London.
Any substantial changes will be outlined as part of my Police and Crime Plan and will go through extensive consultation.
Detective shortage Question No: 2016/2119 Andrew Dismore What progress is being made in addressing the shortage of trained detectives?
The Mayor
Significant activity is underway to increase the number of trained detectives. This includes: external recruitment campaigns; detective recruitment open days; specialist crime trainee detective scheme; and mentoring schemes across territorial policing and specialist departments to identify and support detectives of the future.
The latest recruitment process selected 101 new trainee detectives. Furthermore an additional 225 officers have registered for the National investigator exam (NIE).
Water cannon Question No: 2016/2120 Andrew Dismore Will you now dispose of the useless water cannon?
The Mayor
I made a manifesto commitment to do this and I intend to deliver it. Officers qualified for promotion 1 Question No: 2016/2121 Andrew Dismore How many Met. constables have passed the necessary examinations and are qualified for promotion to sergeant?
The Mayor
2,007 Police Constables / Detective Constables currently hold valid Objective Structured Performance Related Examination (OSPRE) passes for sergeant.
Officers qualified for promotion 2 Question No: 2016/2122 Andrew Dismore How many Met. sergeants have passed the necessary examinations and are qualified for promotion to inspector ?
The Mayor
793 substantive Police Sergeants / Detective Sergeants currently hold valid OSPRE passes.
Officer Vacancies 1 Question No: 2016/2123 Andrew Dismore How many sergeant vacancies are you anticipating in the Met over the current year?
The Mayor
The MPS are anticipating approximately 450 sergeant vacancies over the coming year.
Officer Vacancies 2 Question No: 2016/2124 Andrew Dismore How many inspector vacancies are you anticipating in the Met over the current year?
The Mayor
The MPS are anticipating approximately 200 inspector vacancies over the coming year. Special constables Question No: 2016/2125 Andrew Dismore What plans do you have to increase the number of specials in the Met and how do you propose to achieve this?
The Mayor
The MPS completed a review of the MSC earlier in the year and I will be sure to reflect on its findings as I develop my Police and Crime Plan.
Police horses Question No: 2016/2126 Andrew Dismore How many police horses are there in the Met; how many officers are there qualified to be mounted officers; and what is the cost of keeping a police horse, per year?
The Mayor
The Mounted Branch operates at 110 horses across London. The MPS has a total of 142 riding police officers and a budget of £5,558 per horse per annum. This budget excludes stables which are part of the estates budget.
River police Question No: 2016/2127 Andrew Dismore How many police launches are there in the Met., and what is the annual cost of keeping a launch operational?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Senior officer residential accommodation Question No: 2016/2128 Andrew Dismore Does the Met still provide, pay for, or subsidise the cost of accommodation for senior officers; if so which officers benefit from this perk; and what does it cost per year?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Capital City Functions Question No: 2016/2129 Andrew Dismore What is the current estimate of the cost to the Met of the international and capital city functions it performs; how is this calculated; and how much is reimbursed by central government?
The Mayor
The National and International Capital City (NICC) functions cover a number of unique and additional demands. These include the policing of national-scale protests, which are often focused on the capital as the seat of Government; protection for our national and international interests such as the financial centre, major tourist attractions, foreign embassies and critical national infrastructure; and managing the impact of London as a draw for criminals from the UK and overseas.
Throughout 2015, the Home Office conducted a review of the NICC functions concluding with an independent panel to review the bid of MOPAC/MPS. The independent panel concurred with MOPAC/MPS proposals which were costed at £281m. However, the Government only allocated £174m, 62% of the panel's assessment of need.
143 bus route Question No: 2016/2130 Andrew Dismore Are you aware of a petition to increase the frequency of 143 buses, and will you look to do so, on one of the few cross-Barnet bus routes?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
TfL is not aware of any petition regarding route 143. If your office has any further details please forward these on to TfL and it can consider the petitioners' views and respond.
Route 143 operates every 12 minutes Monday to Saturday during the day with services every 15 minutes on evenings and Sundays. Route 643 also provides additional services for students at Christ's College.
A recent review in April 2016 confirmed there is sufficient capacity; however traffic delays linked to roadworks around Archway affected these routes. An additional bus was therefore added to route 143 in May 2016 to mitigate these delays. TfL and the operator will continue to monitor these routes and take further action as appropriate. 80th anniversary of International Brigades Question No: 2016/2131 Andrew Dismore This autumn sees the 80th anniversary of the foundation of the International Brigades in the Spanish Civil War and next January the foundation of the English speaking battalion, in which many Londoners served. Will you support commemoration of these events and the sacrifices made by so many Londoners in Spain in the fight against Fascism?
The Mayor
I of course support commemorations of the International Brigades and the English speaking battalion for their role in the Spanish Civil War.
We should never forget the sacrifices that over 2000 British people made in defending democracy and the successful fight against Fascism from 1936 to 1939.
As Mayor I will be highlighting the memory of those that have lost their lives from all conflicts and that is why on 20th June I proudly spoke at City Hall's Armed Forces Day Ceremony.
Retrofitted Buses Question No: 2016/2132 Florence Eshalomi Can you provide more details on your plans for 3,000 more existing buses to be retrofitted with upgraded exhaust systems to cut oxides of nitrogen?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
I have now launched a consultation on a major package of measures to tackle air pollution in London. This includes a number of proposals where I expect TfL to lead by example using the bus fleet, such as expanding its retrofit programme to 3,000 buses that operate outside the central zone.
The retrofit solution will ensure the buses are upgraded to meet the Euro VI engine emission standard for oxides of nitrogen and particulate matter. Accessible Trains (1) Question No: 2016/2133 Florence Eshalomi A recent DfT Report says that over 60% of the national rail fleet complies with the Rail Vehicle Accessibility Regulations. What is the size of the London Underground, London Overground & TfL Rail fleet and how much of the fleet complies with the regulations?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
There are 619 trains in the London Underground fleet, of which 56 per cent are Rail Vehicle Accessibility Regulations (RVAR) compliant, and 140 trains in the London Overground/TfL Rail fleet, of which 54 per cent are RVAR compliant. Most recently the introduction of 191 new 'S stock' trains has ensured that the Circle. District, Hammersmith & City and Metropolitan lines are compliant.
Compliance is generally achieved by meeting the requirements for rail vehicles set out in the regulations, but can also be achieved through limited-scope exemptions granted by the Secretary of State for Transport, following discussion with the Disabled Persons' Transport Advisory Committee and other relevant stakeholders, on the provision of evidence explaining the rationale for the exemption.
London Underground is working on a package of modifications and exemptions to achieve compliance for the Bakerloo, Central, Jubilee, Piccadilly and Waterloo & City lines. With regard to London Overground and TfL Rail/the Elizabeth line, 111 new trains will be introduced between 2017 and 2019, and all existing non-compliant trains withdrawn. Accessible Trains (2) Question No: 2016/2134 Florence Eshalomi Will all London Underground, London Overground & TfL Rail passenger trains abide by the regulations by 2020 as the Equality Act 2010 requires?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
The Circle, Hammersmith & City, Metropolitan, Northern and Victoria lines trains are all Rail Vehicle Accessibility Regulation (RVAR) compliant. On the District line, trains will be fully compliant once the introduction of new S stock trains is completed by the end of 2016. TfL is also working to achieve compliance on the Jubilee line by 2020.
On the Bakerloo, Central, Piccadilly and Waterloo & City lines, the New Tube for London fleet will begin to be introduced from the 2020s and will fully meet the requirements of RVAR. In the meantime, London Underground is in discussion with the Department for Transport about the modifications that can be made to trains operating on those lines, to cover the remainder of their operational life. While meaningful improvements for disabled customers can be made, it is also the case that the relatively short remaining lifespan of many of these trains means the most value for money option is likely to include seeking scope- and time-limited exemptions from some of the requirements, where meeting them would be very costly or of limited benefit to customers.
For London Overground and TfL Rail/Elizabeth line, the replacement of legacy rolling stock with new fleets of trains between 2017 and 2019 will ensure compliance by 2020. Accessible Trains (3) Question No: 2016/2135 Florence Eshalomi Section 183 of the Equality Act empowers the transport secretary to grant exemption orders for some rail vehicles. How many exceptions were granted to London Underground, London Overground & TfL Rail? How long do the exemptions last for? How much of the fleet does each exemption cover?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28/06/2016
The DfT provides details of the exemptions at: www.gov.uk/government/publications/exemptions-from-rail-vehicle-accessibility-regulations- and-their-expiry-dates.
The DfT identifies 24 active exemptions granted for London Underground (LU) fleets. A further 12 exemptions for LU have now expired because the relevant requirement in the regulations has subsequently been achieved. Each exemption is granted for the whole fleet operating on a particular line, and there are varying end dates.
There have been no exemptions granted for London Overground or TfL Rail.
Accessible Trains (4) Question No: 2016/2136 Florence Eshalomi Is London Underground still planning to renew an exemption order for Victoria Line 09TS stock, Metropolitan Line S8 stock and District, Circle and Hammersmith and City S7 stock this year?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28/06/2016
This exemption relates to the length of the audible warning played when the doors are about to close, which is currently shorter than the required three seconds. London Underground (LU) will be undertaking a trial this summer on the Victoria line to test the safety, operability and customer benefit of introducing a three-second warning. Subsequently, a decision will be taken on whether to implement the full three-second warning, or to seek an ongoing exemption from this requirement. The trial will set the precedent for the rest of the LU fleet. Accessible Trains (5) Question No: 2016/2137 Florence Eshalomi With regards to any exemption orders when do you believe that part of the fleet with be retrofitted or replaced in order to remove the exemption?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28/06/2016
I am committed to improving accessibility across all transport services in the capital, including London Underground (LU).
Where exemptions are in place, LU will seek to meet the relevant requirements before they expire. Some exemptions have expiry dates contingent on other developments, for example the provision of step-free access at a particular station, and it is not therefore possible to give a firm indication of when the exemption will be removed.
As explained in MQ2016/2134, LU will be seeking limited-scope, evidenced exemptions from elements of the requirements for fleets on the Bakerloo, Central, Jubilee, Piccadilly and Waterloo & City lines. This is particularly the case where the necessary modification would come at disproportionate cost for the customer benefit provided. As new trains are introduced on a number of these lines from the 2020s, trains will meet the requirements to the fullest extent possible, reducing the reliance on exemptions as a way of ensuring compliance.
Cashless Buses Question No: 2016/2138 Florence Eshalomi A constituent asks, "Why has TFL decided to make all its buses 'cash-free' beyond the rather weak claims that this move has made the system more efficient? Is there any chance that there will be a reintroduction of the ability to pay your fare by cash, to ensure that truly everyone in London, not just the regular oyster card users, can use the bus".
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28/06/2016
Please see my response to MQ 1869 / 2016. London Bridge Toilets (1) Question No: 2016/2139 Florence Eshalomi According to the Thameslink Programme, "toilets in the redeveloped London Bridge station concourse will be in the unpaid area of the station but will not be free to use. At platform level, there will be disabled toilet facilities available on certain platforms". Do you agree with me that there should be some toilets on the paid area of the station so passengers changing trains can use a toilet without leaving the station?
The Mayor
I appreciate that access to toilet facilities is an important issue for customers. Network Rail though is responsible for decisions about the provision of toilets at its stations.
London Bridge Toilets (2) Question No: 2016/2140 Florence Eshalomi Do you think toilets located at railway/underground stations should be free?
The Mayor
Most public toilets across the TfL network are free to use. At some locations, where the toilet is located on the 'unpaid' area of the station there is a small charge to help pay for the maintenance of a safe and clean facility available to all members of the public, and not just TfL's own customers.
London Bridge Toilets (3) Question No: 2016/2141 Florence Eshalomi Did Network Rail consult you about these changes? Should they have done?
The Mayor
Network Rail engaged with TfL throughout the planning and implementation stages of the overall redevelopment at London Bridge. Network Rail is responsible for specific decisions about the provision of toilets at its stations. Sickle Cell in Schools Question No: 2016/2144 Florence Eshalomi Noting your responsibilities in relation to health inequalities, will you consider holding a series of workshops for London boroughs to promote access to treatment for school children with sickle cell disease?
The Mayor
Through the Healthy Schools London (HSL) programme, I will support schools to consider and respond to the health and wellbeing needs of their pupils.
Working with boroughs and schools, HSL focuses on the whole child and promotes a whole school approach to health and wellbeing. All schools that achieve an Award must ensure that they have a policy on how they deal with special needs including any medical needs of pupils. Schools must also detail how they identify and meet the needs of vulnerable children and young people and have arrangements to provide appropriate support.
This includes accessing external agencies and support. I am able to publicise information regarding access to sickle cell treatment on my Healthy Schools London website if required. Three- quarters of all London schools are taking part in Healthy Schools London (1752 schools).
Taxi & PHV Engagement (1) Question No: 2016/2145 Florence Eshalomi Can you confirm that the May 2010 version of the "Engagement Policy for Associations Representing London Taxi Drivers" is the latest version? If not please provide me with a copy of the latest version.
The Mayor
The most recent version of TfL's policy for engagement with the taxi trade was published in May 2010.
However, I believe that there is a need to modernise TfL's approach to engagement with the taxi trade and ensure that it is far more inclusive. That is why my Deputy Mayor for Transport is already working with TfL to review in the way it engages with the taxi trade. Taxi & PHV Engagement (2) Question No: 2016/2146 Florence Eshalomi Can you confirm that the 3 key organisations TfL has a relationship remain the Licensed Taxi Driver Association (LTDA), Unite the Union (formerly T&GWU) Cab Drivers' section & the London Cab Drivers Club (LCDC)? Have any other organisations been added to that list?
The Mayor
I believe that there is a need to modernise TfL's approach to engagement with the taxi trade and ensure that it is far more inclusive. That is why my Deputy Mayor for Transport is already working with TfL to review in the way it engages with the taxi trade.
In its role as industry regulator, TfL engages with a wide range of organisations with regular and ad-hoc meetings and communications to discuss issues affecting their members. This includes regular meetings with the Licensed Taxi Driver Association, Unite the Union and the London Cab Drivers Club who between them represent approximately half of all taxi drivers. Taxi & PHV Engagement (3) Question No: 2016/2147 Florence Eshalomi Can you provide a list of the associations that wish to engage with TfL on taxi driver issues and the number of drivers they represented on 1st April 2016?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
I believe that a modern and more inclusive approach to engagement with the taxi trade is required. That is why I have asked TfL to instigate a review in the way it engages with the taxi trade.
A number of organisations or parties interested in matters affecting taxi drivers exist including:
The Licensed Taxi Drivers' Association
The London Cab Drivers Club
Unite the Union
RMT
United Cabbies Group
GMB
Save Taxi, a social media campaign with 10,000 followers on Facebook including taxi drivers and their families
The Suburban Action Group
Suburban Taxi Drivers' Coalition
The Richmond Taxi Drivers Association
Approximate membership numbers within these groups ranges from fewer than 50 to over 10,000 members. Taxi & PHV Engagement (4) Question No: 2016/2148 Florence Eshalomi Do you have a similar Engagement Policy for Associations Representing London Privivate Hire Vehicle Drivers & Companies? If so please provide me with a copy.
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
TfL meets with a number of associations representing the interests of private hire drivers and operators on a regular basis, including the Licensed Private Hire Car Association, the Private Hire Board, the Chauffeur & Executive Committee, which represent the interests of private hire operators, and the GMB, which represents the interests of private hire drivers. TfL also holds regular meetings with the largest private hire operators.
Taxi & PHV Engagement (5) Question No: 2016/2149 Florence Eshalomi The "Provisional Taxi and Private Hire Strategy 2015" mentions working relationships with the Licensed Private Hire Car Association, the Private Hire Board, the GMB and the Chauffeur and Executive Association. Are these the key organisations TfL works with?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
Please see my response to MQ 2016/2148.
Taxi & PHV Engagement (6) Question No: 2016/2150 Florence Eshalomi Can you provide a list of the associations that wish to engage with TfL on private hire vehicle driver issues and the number of drivers they represented on 1st April 2016?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
Please see my response to MQ 2016/2148. PHV Standard of English Question No: 2016/2151 Florence Eshalomi In January 2016 TfL agreed that "Private hire drivers to be required to demonstrate a certain standard of English, with particular emphasis on ability on spoken communication - in line with the Home Office requirement for a B1 qualification when applying for citizenship". Of the reading, listening, speaking & writing qualifications which of them will a driver be required to pass?
The Mayor
TfL is making significant amendments to private hire regulations to improve passenger safety and the overall quality of private hire provision in London. A series of 18 proposals were approved by TfL Board in March 2016, which included a requirement that drivers demonstrate a certain level of English.
TfL will now work towards implementing these changes. From 1 October 2016, all new private hire driver applicants and licensees renewing their license will be required to demonstrate an appropriate level of reading, listening, speaking and writing skills, in line with the Home Office requirement for a B1 qualification.
Making GLA Staff More Representative of London's Population Question No: 2016/2152 Florence Eshalomi Over the last 8 years of the previous Mayors term the number of women and BAME staff at senior levels has decreased. What will you do to readdress this balance so that the GLA (and the other functional bodies) better reflect the population it serves?
The Mayor
I am committed to making the GLA (and the GLA group) representative of London at all levels. I recognise that there are challenges in delivering this across the GLA group and the current position needs significant improvement.
I am already working to ensure my directly appointed team and my board appointments reflect London's diversity.
I will be working with the Head of Paid Service in the GLA and senior managers in the functional bodies to hold them to account for delivering my commitment on this. Fare Evasion (1) Question No: 2016/2153 1 Attachments Florence Eshalomi TfL regularly conduct surveys in order to estimate the level of fare evasion. Please publish all surveys conducted in 2015 and 2016 and commit to publishing all future survey results.
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
The table attached as Appendix E adds 2015 results to the table previously supplied in response to MQ 2016/0319. 2016 results will be updated by summer 2017.
The key figure is the net loss after allowing for money recovered through maximum fares and penalty fares. The reduction in the net loss - from 1.8 per cent to 1.2 per cent of fares income - has been achieved despite the number of passengers on the TfL network increasing by almost 20 per cent over the same period.
TfL continues to work hard with the police to check tickets on buses, trams, trains and stations, and to carry out operations to stamp out fare evasion.
Fare Evasion (2) Question No: 2016/2154 Florence Eshalomi In terms of fare evasion can you provide details of the cost of fare evasion, broken down by method. For example, not buying a ticket, misuse of a concessionary card, etc.
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
Given the complexity in the calculation of gross and net losses and the different methodologies involved in monitoring fare evasion across the network, a breakdown of the net loss by type of evasion is not readily available.
The tables below set out estimates of the way fare evasion and ticket irregularity breaks down based on revenue inspectors' records for bus and London Underground services. The tables give an overall impression of the issues routinely encountered by inspectors but the detail should be interpreted cautiously. For example, customers who tell an inspector they have no ticket may in fact possess a ticket or permit which they have been using improperly.
In summary, around two thirds of all bus ticketing irregularities involve concessionary schemes such as those for younger people, older people or other discounted travel. The remaining third of bus ticketing irregularities by fare payers primarily involve customers who have no ticket or who have not touched in their pay as you go card.
On London Underground only 10 per cent of irregularities involve a fare concession. Most irregularities here involve pay as you go travellers who have not touched in or customers who have no ticket.
Indicative estimates of the types of bus ticketing irregularity
2015 TfL estimates No Zip card 29% Zip card not touched in 15% Zip card etc defaced or iIllegible 15% Concession card photo mismatch 8% No ticket or ticket not valid 20% PAYG card not touched in 13% Total 100% Indicative estimates of the types of Underground ticketing irregularity
2015 TfL estimates PAYG trip not touched in 40% No ticket 37% Ticket being used is out of zone/out of date etc 13% Concession related 10% Total 100%
TfL & Zero Hours Contracts (1) Question No: 2016/2155 Florence Eshalomi Following on MQT 2013/2771 can you confirm that no TfL employee was employed on a zero hours contract in 2013/14 to date?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
While there is no formal definition of zero hours contracts, they are generally understood to be contracts of employment which provide that the employer is not required to guarantee the individual a minimum number of working hours each week, but the employee is obliged to be available to do all work offered to them under the contract.
TfL does not employ or engage any individuals on these terms.
It does engage a small number of workers on contracts that are more casual than standard contracts for work, including traffic counting and surveys. For these contracts, TfL is not obliged to offer work but workers are not obliged to accept assignments and are free to work for other employers, which is considered by TfL to be a fairer arrangement than zero hours contracts.
TfL & Zero Hours Contracts (2) Question No: 2016/2156 Florence Eshalomi How many people have worked on zero hour contracts through the TfL chain of contracting from 2008/09 to date. Please provide figures for every financial year.
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/09/2016
TfL does not collect data on whether zero-hours contracts are used in its supply chain.
I am reviewing the GLA Group Responsible Procurement Policy, to ensure that zero-hour contracts are never used to exploit workers, and to ensure suppliers and contractors are adopting the same high standards as the GLA. TfL & Transparency (1) Question No: 2016/2157 Florence Eshalomi Can you confirm that all contracts with a value over £5,000 are already published by TfL?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
At present, the details of contracts over £5,000 published online reflect TfL's internal contracts registers. Details can be found at the link: tfl.gov.uk/corporate/transparency/#on-this-page-2
As part of its work to improve efficiency and transparency, TfL is reviewing these registers to ensure they are comprehensive. If necessary, the online data will be updated in light of this review.
TfL & Transparency (2) Question No: 2016/2158 Florence Eshalomi Can you confirm whether TfL can unilaterally sign up to the UK Statistics Authority's Code of Practice for Official Statistics given that the Cabinet Office refused to classify them as official stastics in 2011.
The Mayor
It is clearly important that the production and use of statistics by TfL meets user requirements and is consistent with other essential principles such as frankness and accessibility, impartiality and integrity which feature in the UK Statistics Authority's Code of Practice. The Code applies to organisations which produce official statistics and the extent of its coverage is determined by secondary legislation.
TfL cannot be formally subject to the Code without a change to that legislation. However, the GLA's existing Code of Practice on the Use of Statistics also applies to TfL and is similar in effect and intent to the UK Statistics Authority Code. ULEZ (1) Question No: 2016/2159 Florence Eshalomi The Ultra-Low Emission Zone is planned to come into force in September 2020. You have said you wish to bring this date forward. To when?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
I have been elected with a clear mandate to clean up London's air. As per my recent announcement on 5th July to battle London's toxic air, we will be introducing a Euro VI hybrid standard for double decker buses in the ULEZ a year earlier in 2019, we are consulting on a new emissions surcharge from 2017 for the most polluting vehicles driving in central London and consulting on introducing the central London ULEZ one year earlier in 2019.
I want Londoners to have a genuine say on these proposals, full details of which have been provided as part of the consultation, which will encourage submission of any other ideas people may have.
ULEZ (2) Question No: 2016/2160 Florence Eshalomi Will you allow boroughs to opt-into the ULEZ scheme?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
I am currently consulting on a major set of initiatives, including options to extend the boundary of the Ultra-Low Emission Zone. TfL, GLA, London boroughs and London Councils continue to discuss the technical details of extending the ULEZ. The current consensus is that an individual borough "opt-in" system would not provide a workable solution for Londoners because of the need for a clear enforcement strategy and understandable diversion route away from the zone. Clean Bus Corridors (1) Question No: 2016/2161 Florence Eshalomi A Policy Exchange/King's College Report in March 2016 suggested clean bus corridors for Oxford Street, Brixton Road and Knightsbridge. What streets will your own clean bus corridors cover?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
The London bus fleet is already becoming significantly cleaner in readiness for the Ultra-Low Emission Zone and this is bringing increasing air quality benefits to these three locations.
Clean Bus Corridors, outside of the ULEZ, will be selected on the basis of where cleaner buses can bring about substantial enhancements to highways with high oxides of nitrogen. It will factor in research on air quality hot spots across the capital.
I will be announcing further details later this year.
Clean Bus Corridors (2) Question No: 2016/2162 Florence Eshalomi A Policy Exchange/King's College Report in March 2016 suggested clean bus corridors would be agreed in 2017; implemented in 2020; and would become effective from 2025. What is your own timetable for agreement and implementation and when do you think they will become effective?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
I am keen to cut oxides of nitrogen on the most polluted London corridors where buses can make the greatest difference as soon as possible. Plans are being developed which could see the first corridor introduced within the next year - much faster than these timeframes. I will announce further details later this year. Buying Clean Electric Or Hydrogen Buses Question No: 2016/2163 Florence Eshalomi You have said you would set a target of only buying clean electric or hydrogen buses from 2020. Does this mean TfL will be buying buses direct, as it does for the new routemaster, or do you mean companies tendering to provide bus services in London will be required to use clean electric or hydrogen buses on those routes?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
My commitment is for all new double-deck buses entering the London fleet from 2018 to be low-emission hybrid or zero-emission (either electric or hydrogen). Bus operators would procure these in the usual way from the open market in relation to route contracts they win by competitive tender.
The speed this can happen will be heavily influenced by whether we can secure further reductions in existing price premiums for new technologies. This is why I plan to hold an international bus summit later this year so that we can work together with other cities to provide assurance to manufacturers about our future policy direction.
Electric Vehicles (1) Question No: 2016/2164 Florence Eshalomi How many charging points does the Source London network currently have?
The Mayor
The Source London network, which is owned and managed by Bluepoint London, currently has around 1,400 charging points. Electric Vehicles (2) Question No: 2016/2165 Florence Eshalomi In December 2013 TfL said that the aim was to have 6,000 charging points by 2018. Is this an aim you share?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
BluePointLondon (BPL) took over the ownership and management of the Source London network on 1 September 2014. TfL no longer has any role in the management or administration of the network following the transition to BPL.
However, I am committed to support the delivery of electric vehicle charging infrastructure in partnership with the private sector. TfL continues to work with partners, including helping BPL with its stated intention to expand the Source London EV charging network to 6,000 charge points by 2018, as well as supporting new entrants to the market and bringing forward its own plans for electric charging expansion such as plans for rapid chargers for commercial users. Electric Vehicles (3) Question No: 2016/2166 Florence Eshalomi How many charging points would you like to see in London at the end of your first term of office?
The Mayor
I have made it clear that I want to see a major expansion in the use of ultra-low emission vehicles to tackle London's air quality crisis and to reduce our long-term impact on climate change. However, I do not want to follow my predecessor in setting an arbitrary target for volume of charging points.
We need to build on existing research and work with the private sector to make sure we are delivering the right level and type of infrastructure at the right time in the right location. It is also in everyone's interest that, in the long-term, we remain technology neutral to avoid precluding ever improving technologies such as hydrogen and to accommodate new ways of charging electric vehicles, such as wireless induction.
That said I remain very committed to a number of specific programmes underway so that Londoners and commercial operators can feel confident in switching to cleaner vehicles far sooner than planned.
This includes the joint GLA/TfL/London Councils £13m Go Ultra Low City Scheme, which will have a huge impact on the level of charging points in residential areas and TfL's extensive programme to install rapid charging infrastructure, which will help the taxi trade to embrace new zero emission capable vehicles from next year. Electric Vehicles (4) Question No: 2016/2167 Florence Eshalomi How big is the GLA family fleet and how many of those vehicles are electric?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/09/2016
LFEPA
LFEPA has a fleet of 508 vehicles, 57 of which will be electric cars (100 per cent of fleet cars) when the current replacement of fleet cars is complete - expected to be by the end of June 2016. To date, 30 electric cars had been put into service.
MOPAC/ MPS
The Metropolitan Police operates a fleet of 5,186 vehicles, which includes items of plant and equipment. Currently of these:
28 are wholly electric assets
22 are hybrid petrol/electric vehicles
MOPAC/MPS is actively looking at where electric vehicles can be deployed.
TfL
The TfL fleet comprises 1,261 vehicles, including eight pure electric vehicles, 37 hybrid (petrol/electric) and six hydrogen fuel cell. TfL is actively exploring ways to increase the number of hydrogen vehicles in its fleet and has submitted a bid to the Office for Low Emission Vehicles to fund 20 electric/hydrogen vehicles. TfL is also seeking to replace its fleet with ultra low emission vehicles, including hydrogen, where possible. TfL recently trialled a Transit sized diesel/hydrogen van and is considering the suitability of this vehicle.
London's bus fleet is comprised of 9,186 buses, which includes 22 electric buses and 1,743 hybrid buses (including eight hydrogen fuel cell buses).
GLA response
The GLA does not have any electric vehicles in its fleet. The Future of Cycling (1) Question No: 2016/2168 Florence Eshalomi What steps do you plan to take to make cycling an easier choice for more Londoners?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
I was elected on a commitment to improve cycling infrastructure, including Quietways and Cycle Superhighways.
I will also provide a comprehensive Cycling Promotion and Training programme to ensure Londoners are confident and able to get on their bikes. This will be achieved through cycle training, workplace promotion and rollout of more community grants.
Finally, I will work to improve provision of cycle parking to make cycling a practical choice for getting out and about in the capital.
The Future of Cycling (2) Question No: 2016/2169 Florence Eshalomi What steps do you plan to take to make cycling a safer choice for more Londoners?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
Progress has been made over recent years on improving cycling safety in the capital, with a 25 per cent reduction in the rate of cyclists killed or seriously injured per journey in 2014 compared with the 2005-2009 average.
However, even one death is unacceptable and I am committed to taking action to reduce casualties as much as possible. We have much to do to make sure that London's roads are as safe as possible for cyclists so that we continue to see increasing numbers of people cycling.
I will ensure that TfL continues to improve the safety of cyclists through its road safety programme and continuing investment in cycling improvements. Pedestrianisation Of Oxford Street (1) Question No: 2016/2170 Florence Eshalomi When will the TfL & Westminster City Council investigation into the pedestrianisation of Oxford Street be published?
The Mayor
TfL and Westminster City Council are examining a range of options on behalf of the West End Partnership for improving the pedestrian environment on Oxford Street. Public consultation on the options is planned for early next year. I expect a report to be available later this year.
Pedestrianisation Of Oxford Street (2) Question No: 2016/2171 Florence Eshalomi In November 2014, the previous Mayor said he would ask TfL to review the idea of car-free days in London. Will you publish the results of that review?
The Mayor
While I cannot speak for the commitments made by the previous Mayor, I understand that no formal review was produced as traffic-free days on Oxford Street have in the past been led by the New West End Company, rather than TfL.
I am supportive of traffic-free days, which are primarily organised by third parties with support from local authorities, TfL and the GLA. I am keen to consider further traffic-free days, as well as similar events aimed at improving access for pedestrians and cyclists.
I have asked TfL to continue to work with boroughs, communities and business organisations to support traffic-free days across London, including on Oxford Street. Part-Pedestrianise Parliament Square Question No: 2016/2172 Florence Eshalomi When will you publish plans to part-pedestrianise Parliament Square?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28/06/2016
I am committed to working with Westminster City Council and TfL to part-pedestrianise Parliament Square as part of my wider plans to make some of London's great places more accessible and appealing to Londoners and visitors alike. It will be vital to ensure that the proposals I bring forward work well for all stakeholders and this complex scheme will consequently take some time to develop. I will keep the Assembly informed as this work progresses.
Pedestrian Champion Question No: 2016/2173 Florence Eshalomi Will your pedestrian champion be a member of the TfL Board?
The Mayor
The TfL Board will play a key role in ensuring future transport provision meets the needs of all Londoners and I will personally chair TfL to oversee this work.
In line with the Deloitte review of TfL's effectiveness in 2015, I will appoint a smaller Board and avoid appointing individuals to 'representative' roles or whose contribution will be limited or compromised by conflicts of interest.
My Deputy Mayor for Transport is currently leading discussions to establish the most appropriate means of delivering enhanced promotion of more active travel and progress is being made. The Thames Path (1) Question No: 2016/2174 Florence Eshalomi Please list those sections of the Thames Path that are incomplete.
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
As a National Trail, management of the route is the responsibility of Natural England, and regulation of local access rights for the route falls within the remit of London boroughs as land owners and planning authorities. TfL has previously funded improvements to the path. I will work with boroughs, land owners and business to complete the path.
The Thames Path (2) Question No: 2016/2175 Florence Eshalomi How much of the Thames Path is publically owned and how much is privately owned.
The Mayor
The Thames Path is a great asset for London and I will work with boroughs, landowners and businesses to protect access and complete missing sections. I want to increase the number of people walking in London and this forms part of that goal.
As a National Trail, management of the route is the responsibility of Natural England. Regulation of local access rights for the route falls within the remit of London boroughs as land owners and planning authorities.
TfL does not currently have a record of how much land is publicly or privately owned along the length of the path. The Thames Path (3) Question No: 2016/2176 Florence Eshalomi Please list the sections of the Thames Path in London that do not have 24 hour access.
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
TfL does not have a record of sections of the path that do not have 24 hour access. As a National Trail, management of the Thames Path is the responsibility of Natural England, and regulation of local access rights for the route falls within the remit of London boroughs as land owners and planning authorities.
The Thames Path (4) Question No: 2016/2177 Florence Eshalomi The Ramblers have said that there is "no definitive map as the route is not a right of way so the exact route is not totally clear and the access rights along each section aren't clear to the public". Will you commit to producing such a map?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
I will work with boroughs, land owners and business to complete missing sections and protect access to what is already open.
As a National Trail, management of the route is the responsibility of Natural England and regulation of local access rights for the route falls within the remit of London boroughs as land owners and planning authorities.
TfL provides free maps and guides on its website, but has no plans to develop a definitive map of access rights along the Thames Path.
The free maps and guides can be found at: https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/walking/thames-path Walking Routes (1) Question No: 2016/2178 Florence Eshalomi How many new walking routes do you intend to introduce?
The Mayor
I am keen to promote more active travel through a variety of approaches. I have asked TfL to explore how it can work with boroughs and other partners to open up more walking routes around London, I will keep the Assembly informed as this develops.
Walking Routes (2) Question No: 2016/2179 Florence Eshalomi What improvements do you intend to make to the existing 7 walking routes in London?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
TfL has no formal role in maintaining the seven routes, but I have asked TfL to work with boroughs and other partners to ensure the Walk London Network is maintained to a high standard.
Solar PV Arrays (1) Question No: 2016/2180 Florence Eshalomi To date, how many solar PV arrays have been installed on the TfL estate? What is the total installed capacity?
The Mayor
Currently there are eleven solar PV arrays on the TfL estate with a total installed capacity of 245kW. There are also 454 bus shelters with a PV cell on them.
Please also see my response to oral MQ 2016/2016. Solar PV Arrays (2) Question No: 2016/2181 Florence Eshalomi What plans do TfL currently have to install more solar PV arrays?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
TfL is committed to reducing its carbon emissions by improving its energy efficiency and taking carbon out of its energy supply. As part of this work, TfL is looking at how a value for money approach to solar PV can be delivered across its estate.
The best approach to date has been to integrate solar PV with other capital projects. This has resulted in, for example, solar PV being installed at as part of upgrade works at Paddington station and in the new Northfields train crew accommodation building.
TfL is working with the GLA to explore the potential of installing solar PV through the Renewable Energy Feed in Tariff (RE:FIT) delivery model.
District Heating Schemes (1) Question No: 2016/2182 Florence Eshalomi To date how many district heating schemes, that make the most of waste heat from the Tube, have been installed? How many homes does each scheme cover?
The Mayor
TfL is committed to developing ways to capture its waste heat and to enabling others such as boroughs to make use of this as they develop district heating schemes.
No schemes have yet been delivered, although TfL is working with the London Borough of Islington to utilise the waste heat from the Tube in the extension of their Bunhill district heating scheme. This scheme will be delivered in early 2017 and will allow Islington to connect 454 homes in the area, with the potential to supply a further 1,000 homes. The scheme will enable TfL and prospective district heating developers to understand how further schemes could be brought to market. District Heating Schemes (2) Question No: 2016/2183 Florence Eshalomi What plans do TfL currently have to install more district heating schemes, that make the most of waste heat from the Tube? How many homes will these future schemes cover?
The Mayor
While TfL does not itself develop district heating schemes, it is committed to developing cost- effective ways to capture its waste heat so that district heating developers can make use of it. An example of this is the project with the London Borough of Islington for the extension of its heat network at Bunhill. This extension will allow Islington Council to connect 454 homes in the area, with the potential to supply a further 1,000 homes.
The Standards For Tfl Buildings (1) Question No: 2016/2184 Florence Eshalomi What are the highest environmental standards on heating, lighting and waste that a building in London can be expected to maintain?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
The highest environmental standards for buildings fall into three broad categories - the setting of targets, design and specification, and measuring performance.
For the first two categories, the highest heating standards are Passivhaus, which represents a zero-carbon standard for buildings, and the 'outstanding' standard under the British Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (known as BREEAM). For lighting, the highest standards are covered by the Energy Performance Certificate, the Zero Carbon standard and also by BREEAM. For waste, the GLA's target of 75 per cent recycling in commercial offices and movement towards a waste recovery (rather than recycling target) represent the highest standards.
To measure performance for heating and lighting, the highest standards are an A rated Display Energy Certificate (DECs), the Building Research Energy Conservation Unit's 19 benchmarks for office buildings, the Real Estate Environmental Benchmark and the improvement target for 2025 in the GLA's Climate Change Mitigation and Energy Strategy. The strategy mandates the use of BREEAM for new builds and refurbishment and DECs for operational performance. For waste, as well as the Real Estate Environmental Benchmark, the Waste and Resources Action Programme benchmark for waste per person. The Standards For Tfl Buildings (2) Question No: 2016/2185 Florence Eshalomi Please list every TfL building and explain how they measure up to the highest environmental standards on heating, lighting and waste?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 19/09/2016
TfL has some 1,000 buildings, including:
- 270 Underground stations
- 112 London Overground stations
- 43 office buildings
- 30 depots, bus stations and garages
- operational buildings such as signalling and power control rooms
- commercial property portfolio
TfL ensures designs for new buildings are to the highest Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (known as BREEAM) standards and it uses the GLA Re:Fit programme for retrofits. TfL specifies technologies from the Government’s Energy and Water Technology Lists as part of existing projects, such as station upgrades.
The BREEAM rating achieved and/or the Display Energy Certificate (DEC) can be used to measure the performance of TfL’s buildings with respect to heating and lighting. A DEC is an operational energy rating that identifies the actual energy use of a building and compares this against the energy use for a benchmark building of the same type.
Waste is measured and reported in TfL’s annual Health, Safety and Environment report, which is available at tfl.gov.uk/corporate/publications-and-reports/health- safety-and-environment. Provision of Bus Services Question No: 2016/2186 Florence Eshalomi When will you launch a review of the provision of bus services to London's hospital?. Will members of the public be able to participate in the review?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
TfL works closely with the NHS to plan links to and from hospitals and to consider the impacts of healthcare services reorganisation using NHS data on trips and passenger numbers.
However, I have asked TfL to launch a review of the provision of bus services to London's hospitals and they will produce a report in the autumn. This report will be discussed with stakeholders, including the London boroughs and the main passenger representation groups.
DEFRA Soil Contamination Funding Question No: 2016/2187 Nicky Gavron Has the Mayor assessed the potential impact of the end of DEFRA funding for soil decontamination in 2017 on brownfield development within London?
The Mayor
Data from the Table 2.1 of the London Plan Annual Monitoring Report shows the high levels of development on brownfield land, currently above 96%. Please see: https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/amr12.pdf
As DEFRA has reduced funding for remediation this has had no discernible impact on the level of brownfield development in London. High development values in London mean that remediation can be delivered by developers as they redevelop sites. I agree with the conclusion of the House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee pg 35 "Contamination in high-value areas such as London will continue to be remediated through planning, while sites in other cities such as Middlesborough…will not be identified or remediated at all." http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmenvaud/180/180.pdf 50% Affordable Housing Targets: Updating local plans Question No: 2016/2188 Nicky Gavron How can the GLA support local boroughs reviewing their housing targets within local plans ahead of the new London Plan?
The Mayor
We will be consulting shortly on an Affordable Housing Supplementary Planning Guidance which aims to maximise affordable housing output in the terms of the policy of the 2016 London Plan, and also to provide a clear direction of travel towards my overall strategic target for 50%, which I intend to formalise in my new London Plan.
This should provide clarity for boroughs developing their local plans.
Affordable Workspace Question No: 2016/2189 Nicky Gavron How has the Mayor instructed GLA planners to provide stronger protection for workspace for SMEs, artists and start ups ahead of the next London Plan?
The Mayor
On 3 June, I announced measures including amending the London Plan so that there is stronger protection for small businesses and start-up workspace; delivering new spaces for small businesses, the creative industries, artists and the fashion industry within new residential and mixed-use developments; and promoting schemes to provide linked affordable housing and business space in new housing developments.
Ahead of the London Plan we will look at how existing London Plan policy to support workspace can be implemented more rigorously and I will work with the Government on changes to permitted development rights.
I will be looking at how we can support open workspaces, for example through the London Regeneration Fund and New Homes Bonus funding. I am also developing the concept of Creative Enterprise Zones which could support the provision and protection of suitable/flexible workspace, including an element of subsidised employment floorspace, alongside live-work space and affordable housing provision. Outer London Commission Question No: 2016/2190 Nicky Gavron Will the Mayor continue the work of the Outer London Commission and if so, in what form?
The Mayor
I will certainly continue to work to enable Outer London to make its most effective contribution to the capital as a whole and to address the distinct issues which it faces.
I recognise that the Commission has made valuable recommendations to this end, but I wish to review whether it still represents the most effective mechanism for doing so.
Viability Assessment Question No: 2016/2191 Nicky Gavron How can the Mayor support boroughs to achieve greater transparency around viability assessments?
The Mayor
I support greater transparency in viability assessments and will encourage boroughs to do the same through my forthcoming Affordable Housing SPG and by applying this guidance consistently to strategic planning applications referred to the Mayor.
This will ensure that where boroughs are pushing for greater transparency, they are supported by me. Permitted Development, Commercial Space and Business Rate Retention Question No: 2016/2192 Nicky Gavron Has the Mayor assessed the impact of the loss of commercial space under the relaxation of permitted development rights on borough finances, given the introduction of business rate retention?
The Mayor
The GLA's latest monitoring figures show that since 2013, over 1.47 million square metres of office space could potentially be converted into residential units in London using the Government's permitted development rights (PDR). The impact varies across the London boroughs and has been particularly strong in outer London where, on average, almost a fifth of the office stock could be lost. For some boroughs, including Brent, Sutton, Harrow, Richmond and Croydon, more than a quarter of the office stock could be affected.
The GLA monitors business rates income closely through the returns it receives from the 32 boroughs and the Corporation of London. The GLA is also funding a number of borough led projects which seek to maximise business rates income across the capital.
I will work with the boroughs and London Councils to explore the implications of permitted development rights including potential impacts on business rate income.
Private rented sector Question No: 2016/2193 Joanne McCartney The private rented sector is growing in London and often tenants pay high rents and fees with little long-term stability, a particular issue for families with children. How do you intend to combat the issues in London's private rented sector?
The Mayor
Although my powers in this area are limited, I intend to go much further than the previous Mayor and do everything I can to improve the lives of London's renters.
In my manifesto I have set out an ambitious programme of initiatives, including naming and shaming rogue landlords, tackling rip off letting agent fees and supporting local authorities to introduce licensing schemes.
However, I do need additional powers from government in order to address the biggest challenges facing London's renters. Barking to Gospel Oak line Question No: 2016/2194 Joanne McCartney The Barking to Gospel Oak line faces inevitable closures, partially and then completely for a period of eight months in total from the 4th June 2016 to enable the line to be electrified. Whilst the closures are accepted, many commuters will face longer journeys with higher fares. How can you alleviate this issue to ensure that commuters are not paying higher fares whilst being inconvenienced by the works?
The Mayor
TfL has assured me they have put in place the necessary arrangements to minimise the impact on fares for customers during this vital work.
London Overground has worked closely with Network Rail to keep as much of the Gospel Oak to Barking line open, during weekdays, for as long as possible. This has led to a phased closure, with the line between South Tottenham and Barking being closed between June and September, and the full line closure not commencing until 24 September.
Regular users of the Gospel Oak to Barking line will be refunded the extra cost of travel via zone 1 by Tube or rail. Refunds will automatically take place on a weekly basis. Infrequent customers can also request a refund by calling TfL's customer contact centre.
TfL travel advice also recommends the use of the rail replacement buses provided for shorter trips which, with a valid ticket, will not cost customers any more.
More information on the rail closure and measures put in place to mitigate the impact on customers during the closure can be found at: https://tfl.gov.uk/status-updates/major-works- and-events/london-overground-closure
Skills funding Question No: 2016/2195 Joanne McCartney What challenge does the reduction of skills funding and the declining financial health of further education colleges pose for London?
The Mayor
As the Further Education Commissioner highlighted in his letter to the sector last autumn, the need for high level professional and technical skills to improve productivity has never been higher. Sustainability of the sector to fulfil this need will be vital, and the recommendations arising from the area review will be an important step in strengthening the sector's position. Further Education Area Reviews Question No: 2016/2196 Joanne McCartney Can you detail what aspects of further education the area reviews will be looking into in order to make recommendations?
The Mayor
The Area Reviews, being delivered by the FE Commissioner's team and government's Joint Area Review Delivery Unit (JARDU) comprise the following activities:
Economic and educational need analysis
Analysis of current provision and curriculum delivery across the area
Estates analysis
Development of structural options
Options analysis and evaluation
Governing body deliberations
Stakeholder engagement and publication
Future skills for London Question No: 2016/2197 Joanne McCartney GLA Economics have predicted that London will have an average growth of 40,000 jobs per annum by 2036, a total of 6.4 million extra jobs. At the same time, it is predicted that a total of 577,000 workers will retire and need to be replaced. How will you ensure that London has the skills required for this growth?
The Mayor
As London develops its wider plans for skills devolution, the area review of skills is exploring how well the supply of skills in the capital is meeting demand.
I will call upon my new Skills for Londoners taskforce to lead on taking forward recommendations of the review. I will also ask them to see how LEP capital investment in the skills system and access to Adult Learning Loans can support learners in training and/or re- training in the skills that will support London's economy. Uxbridge Town Centre Regeneration Question No: 2016/2198 Onkar Sahota Will the Mayor make available to me at the earliest opportunity the details of the £20m award to Hillingdon from the London Regeneration Fund for Uxbridge Town centre?
The Mayor
LB Hillingdon secured a £800k contribution from the London Regeneration Fund, for a £2m project to improve and bring activity to the eastern end of the High Street.
I am told that this should connect new housing and a theatre on the former RAF site, and make it function as a genuine extension of the town centre. Proposals include public realm works to this part of the High Street and bringing small active uses for blank frontages such as the side of the Civic Centre on the High Street, as well as enhancements to Vine Street.
London Lorry Control Scheme Question No: 2016/2199 Onkar Sahota Will the Mayor examine the London Lorry Control Scheme, currently administered by London Councils, and determine what role the GLA can play in helping to alleviate the many challenges late night lorries driving through residential communities have on Londoners?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
The London Lorry Control Scheme is managed by London Councils on behalf of London's boroughs. I do not have any direct control over the way the scheme is run but I understand that London Councils is undertaking a review of the scheme, which has been largely unchanged since it started in 1986. I have asked TfL to work closely with London Councils to contribute to this review and ensure that the scheme continues to protect residents and enables London's businesses to move deliveries to when there is more space on the road network.
I am determined to ensure that all goods vehicles travelling through London are the safest, cleanest, quietest and most environmentally friendly vehicles available. As set out in my manifesto, I will work with the GLA group to ensure that these safer, cleaner and quieter vehicles are specified within procurement contracts throughout the GLA supply chain. I am also encouraging London's boroughs and businesses to use TfL's existing procurement tools (https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/deliveries-in-london/delivering-legally/work-related-road-risk- compliance) to do the same. Schools Places - Hillingdon Question No: 2016/2200 Onkar Sahota Given that ONS predictions suggest Hillingdon will experience a 24.6% increase in the number of young people, some 14,400 by 2039, will the Mayor publish the terms of reference and membership of the schools places working group he pledged to establish?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28/06/2016
The Projected School Places Demand report by GLA Intelligence as well as reports by London Councils and boroughs' own population projections set out clearly the scale of the challenge. This is why I am determined to play a city-wide strategic leadership role to ensure that school- place planning is co-ordinated across the city between all the partners involved to deliver the school places needed. I am currently seeking the views of London Councils and the Association of Directors of Children's Services on how best to establish a board.
Uber - Heathrow Villages Question No: 2016/2201 Onkar Sahota Residents within Harmondsworth, Sipson and Harlington are increasingly complaining about the number of Uber and private hire vehicles idling within their villages and causing general disturbances to residents, as they wait for fairs from Heathrow Airport. Will the Mayor commit to discussing with Heathrow measures that can be put in place to prevent this from continuing?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
TfL is aware of the issues relating to the behaviour of Private Hire drivers in the areas surrounding Heathrow airport. TfL's Taxi & Private Hire Compliance team regularly work alongside the MPS, local borough police and local authority enforcement officers to carry out enforcement activity against taxi and private hire drivers at Heathrow Airport and the neighbouring areas. Since September 2015, 344 Fixed Penalty Notices and 175 warnings have been issued as a result of joint working with Hillingdon Council's environmental officers.
On 15th June, Heathrow Airport launched an Authorised Vehicle Area (AVA) to provide parking facilities within the airport for Private Hire Vehicles. In addition, all Uber drivers will be restricted, through geo-fencing, to within the space of the AVA. Any driver who is outside of this area will not show on screens as being available, which will discourage idling in the villages. Therefore if a customer books through Uber, the only drivers visible are those in the AVA. Drivers in the AVA will receive customer bookings on a first come, first served basis. North West London Hospital Bus Question No: 2016/2202 Onkar Sahota Given that his predecessor continually refused to intervene, will the Mayor revisit the issue of a bus connection between West Middlesex, Ealing and Northwick Park Hospitals? The so called "Shaping a Healthier Future" plan for hospital service closures continues to not consider the impact on patient and visitor travel in their proposals, and campaigners have long argued for better, direct services between these hospitals, given much of the NHS's modelling for patient redistribution hinges on them being able to travel to alternative hospital sites.
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
West Middlesex and Northwick Park hospitals are both well served by local bus services to their surrounding areas. However, TfL is aware of the importance of this matter and continues to seek ways to further improve the connections between these hospitals which are cost effective and address other requirements such as reliability and capacity.
A new bus route number 483 will be implemented in September 2016 providing new links between Ealing, Northwick Park Hospital, Wembley and Harrow. TfL also intends to divert route E8 to link Hounslow and Ealing via West Middlesex Hospital, and is currently in discussions with the London Borough of Hounslow to identify the best means of providing this link.
I will also look at the provision of bus services to these Hospitals as part of my wider review of bus services and London's hospitals.
LFB Response Time - Harrow Question No: 2016/2203 Navin Shah Is Harrow currently meeting the LFB standard response time? If not, why not, and what action is being taken to remedy this?
The Mayor
Yes. First fire engine attendance times so far for 2016/17 are 05:57 and for the second fire engine are 07:19.
The average first fire engine attendance time for 2015/16 was slightly outside the London- wide target at 06:01, due to a small increase in attendance times between June and November. Since then performance has been more in line with that of previous years and within the London-wide target. Second fire engine attendance times moved within the London-wide target following the addition of a second fire engine at Stanmore station. LFB Response Time - Brent Question No: 2016/2204 Navin Shah Is Brent currently meeting the LFB standard response time? If not, why not, and what action is being taken to remedy this?
The Mayor
Yes. First fire engine attendance times so far for 2016/17 year are 05:51 and for the second fire engine are 07:12. The average first fire engine attendance time for last year was slightly outside the London-wide target at 06:02 due to a small increase in attendance times between June and November. Since then performance has been more in line with that of previous years and within the London-wide target.
Bus Routes for Avanti House School (Harrow) Question No: 2016/2205 Navin Shah What plans there are to enhance bus routes serving the proposed Avanti House School, (Whitchurch Playing Fields Site) Wemborough Road, Harrow?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
TfL is aware of plans to build Avanti House School on the Whitchurch Playing Fields site, just west of Canons Park Tube station by September 2017.
Route 186 currently operates five buses per hour past the school in peak periods. TfL will review capacity in advance of the school opening. All Night Tube Service (Jubilee Line) Question No: 2016/2206 Navin Shah I welcome the launch of the all night tube service announced by the Mayor. Can you please let me have the details about the opening of a similar service incorporating the Jubilee Line in my constituency?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
On 23 May, I announced that Night Tube will launch from 19 August on the Central and Victoria lines.
I continue to prioritise commencing Night Tube services on the remaining lines already announced as soon as possible, including the entire Jubilee line. I expect this to be in the autumn.
Wellbeing Question No: 2016/2207 Navin Shah In relation to the wellbeing of people, specific issues concerning TB and Obesity have been raised in Harrow. What is the Mayor's position to tackle such issues?
The Mayor
I am very concerned that London has the highest proportion of overweight or obese children aged 10-11 years in England. The action I will take to tackle obesity in London will be developed as part of my comprehensive public health strategy.
I am also concerned that London still has one of the highest rates of TB in Western Europe. I look forward to working with partners at the London TB Control Board to tackle this disease and to reduce the rates of TB in London. Queens Park Tube Station Question No: 2016/2208 Navin Shah There are serious concerns about the poor state of this station which has become an eyesore. Can you please advise what is being done by TfL to refurbish urgently to stop the areas like the front of the station falling apart and becoming dangerous?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
Although TfL has been responsible for day-to-day management and operation of Queen's Park station since November 2007, Network Rail still owns the freehold of the station structures and infrastructure and is responsible for the maintenance of these assets.
TfL does not believe the façade at Queen's Park Tube station is unsafe. However, it is in regular contact with Network Rail to discuss issues at the station. I have asked for this matter to be raised with Network Rail.
Safer Neighbourhood Board(s) Question No: 2016/2209 Navin Shah Can you please indicate the short and long term future of SNBs which were re-configured by the previous Mayor fairly recently? Can you further indicate whether the funding arrangements for the SNBs will remain as they are or are they likely to change?
The Mayor
I fully recognise the importance of engagement between the police and the communities they serve, and the local accountability that mechanisms like Safer Neighbourhood Boards deliver. SNBs are currently accessing their allocated 2016/17 funds using a process that will remain in place in the short term.
In the longer term I will be considering how local engagement and accountability takes place and these deliberations will be reflected, in my Police and Crime Plan.
Please also see my response to oral MQ 2336/ 2016. Neighbourhood Policing Question No: 2016/2210 Navin Shah Can you please indicate the short and long term plans for changes you expect to make to render dedicated ward based community policing (teams) stronger and more effective to restore faith of residents in police, tackle crime and the fear of crime.
The Mayor
As I said in my manifesto, I want to restore real neighbourhood policing. This is about how the police work and engage with local people and communities and Sophie Linden, my Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime, is exploring how we might move quicker.
Any significant changes will form part of my Police and Crime Plan and will go through extensive consultation. Alperton Station Shops Question No: 2016/2211 Navin Shah TfL planned to refurbish and re-let the commercial premises of the Alperton Station some year and half ago and with this in pipeline the existing small businesses (some long standing ones renting for nearly 20 years) were vacated with a lot of disquiet and controversy. Unfortunately the premises currently lie empty. Can you give explanation for such a waste of resources and gross inefficiency on part of TfL? What is the latest plan to put the premises back in use and will the previous occupiers be given an opportunity to re-let?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
The original scope of the project to improve Alperton Station was to undertake wider works to both the station and forecourt. A comprehensive plan for the streetscape and public realm was designed in conjunction with the London Borough of Brent. Due to increasing costs and the significant redevelopment of the adjoining school a decision was taken in September 2015 to halt the proposed forecourt works and deliver only the retail units.
The units were constructed in the 1930s and the building structure had reached the end of its economic life, with persistent water ingress into the units. The only way to solve the issue was through comprehensive refurbishment. Due to the age and condition of the building, a full intrusive survey was required. This included drilling bore holes in the concrete roof and the removal of all ceiling and wall coverings to investigate structural integrity.
One of the main issues needing investigation was long-term water ingress from the bridge structure above. These works could not have been undertaken with the tenants remaining in place.
Construction works are due to start shortly and the units are expected to be occupied by tenants in early 2017. The units will be marketed through TfL's commercial agents and the previous tenants will be able to bid. Housing - Unsafe Practices Question No: 2016/2212 Navin Shah 'Shelter' has stated that some councils are guilty of unsafe practices by pressurising homeless families to relocate miles away. What is your position on this situation and how can you help to improve to help communities, involving families and young children, being uprooted from their own neighbourhoods?
The Mayor
It is clearly very disruptive when some homeless families have little option but to accept accommodation away from their local area. This is sadly often the consequence of the pressure that local authorities find themselves under, due to the diminishing supply of social housing, rising rents and growing competition in London's private rented sector, and the welfare reform measures pursued by this Government and the last.
I am committed to helping local authorities manage these pressures and my Deputy for Housing is already in conversation with them about how I might most effectively help.
Green Belt Land - Outer London Boundary Question No: 2016/2213 Navin Shah Do you reject the recent report of the 'Outer London Commission' suggesting principles for co- ordinating reviews of what qualifies as green belt land undertaken at borough level with a view to its "selective release" for development? Would you at all consider elements such as this when you undertake review of the London Plan to accommodate growth?
The Mayor
While I thank the Outer London Commission for its advice, I have already made clear my commitment to protecting the Green Belt and Metropolitan Open Land. Kensal Rise (Brent) - Bus Dominance Question No: 2016/2214 Navin Shah One of my constituents has raised an issue about bus dominance in neighbourhoods such as Kensal Rise where TfL operates 7 bus routes with 13,800 buses weekly. Can areas such as these be looked at to see how they can be rationally addressed in terms of the impact on air quality, congestion and noise pollution?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
TfL regularly monitors demand across the bus network to ensure the appropriate level of capacity is provided. The number of buses serving Kensal Rise reflects the significant demand for buses in this area.
I understand that the buses operating in the Kensal Rise area, particularly along Chamberlayne Road, have become significantly cleaner for NOx emissions and that they will soon be among the cleanest in the fleet as routes 6 and 52 will be converted to Euro VI hybrids within the next couple of years to comply with the upcoming ULEZ standard for double deck buses. This will improve air quality further and reduce vehicle noise.
Cultural Strategy Group (1) Question No: 2016/2215 Fiona Twycross When will the Cultural Strategy Group next be meeting?
The Mayor
The first meeting is planned to take place in September.
Cultural Strategy Group (2) Question No: 2016/2216 Fiona Twycross What progress have you made with appointments to the Cultural Strategy Group?
The Mayor
London's cultural offer is a priority for me and I will be appointing the Culture Strategy Group in due course to push forward my culture manifesto pledges. Cultural Strategy Question No: 2016/2217 Fiona Twycross When will you be producing a Cultural Strategy?
The Mayor
London's cultural offer is a priority for me and I have already set up a Culture Delivery Group to push forward my culture manifesto pledges.
Once the Culture Strategy Group is in place, I will begin statutory process of developing a culture strategy.
The LEP Question No: 2016/2218 Fiona Twycross What lessons can the LEP learn from other LEPs across the UK?
The Mayor
The London Enterprise Panel in a member of the LEP Network, made up of the 39 local enterprise partnerships in England. The LEP Network meets regularly at board member, chief executive/senior officer and junior officer levels to ensure the exchange of information and best practice. In addition, the London Enterprise Panel works closely with those LEPs bordering London on cross‑boundary issues including, for example, the West Anglia Main Line.
Exports Question No: 2016/2219 Fiona Twycross How will you support more London businesses to export goods and services globally?
The Mayor
I will champion London's businesses at home and abroad. With London & Partners, I am supporting high-growth companies in the capital to access global business through initiatives like the Mayor's International Business Programme and London Technology Week. More information about the MIBP can be at http://gotogrow.london/. London and Partners (1) Question No: 2016/2220 Fiona Twycross How will you promote London as a centre for investment and business on the global stage?
The Mayor
As I set out in my manifesto I will continue to champion London industry at home and abroad, making the case for inward investment in our city, and working to attract ever more global business.
My promotional agency for London, London & Partners has extensive expertise building and communicating London's proposition and they will continue to attract more overseas investment and business events, as well as supporting greater exports.
London and Partners (2) Question No: 2016/2221 Fiona Twycross How will you promote tourism in London?
The Mayor
International promotion is important. The tourism economy in London is estimated to be worth £36bn and supports 700,000 jobs across the capital. That is one in every eight jobs. However it is important not be complacent.
As I set out in my manifesto I will continue to work through my promotional agency for London, London & Partners, to promote London to target markets around the globe.
The Living Wage Question No: 2016/2222 Fiona Twycross How will you make London a "Living Wage City"?
The Mayor
I will encourage as many London employers as possible to become Living Wage accredited, for example by raising the matter directly with businesses, ensuring all GLA Group staff are paid the London Living Wage, and considering how business rate relief could be used as an incentive. Digital Literacy Question No: 2016/2223 Fiona Twycross What steps will you take to ensure Londoners have access to courses and programmes to improve levels of digital literacy?
The Mayor
Nearly one in 10 Londoners have never used the internet (8.9% in 2015) and 20% do not have basic digital skills. But digital inclusion is more than just getting people online; it is about transforming lives, particularly for those groups most excluded, including older Londoners and disabled Londoners. When this digital disadvantage is compounded by socio-economic disadvantage, digital exclusion soon becomes a very real barrier to learning, earning and general well-being. This is why I have committed to implementing a new digital inclusion strategy, led by a new Chief Digital Officer, to ensure that everyone in London has the skills to get online to access public services, job opportunities and information with a particular focus on support to groups with the highest rates of digital exclusion.
In addition, my London Digital Talent Pipeline programme will establish new courses and apprenticeships to provide young Londoners aged 15-25 years old with opportunities to gain advanced digital skills. The Ada, National College for Digital Skills will also open in Tottenham Hale in September 2016, providing industry-designed courses and Apprenticeships at level 3 and 4. This is being part funded by the GLA (£7.165m) and BIS (£13.4m).
The London Datastore Question No: 2016/2224 Fiona Twycross Will the new London Data Office, (referenced in MQ answer 2016/1677) come to replace the London Datastore?
The Mayor
The London Datastore is an open data sharing resource for all Londoners. It is well known to the data innovation community in the capital. As such, it will be a useful resource for a new London Data Office. Affordable Childcare Question No: 2016/2225 Fiona Twycross What steps will you take to increase the availability of affordable childcare in London?
The Mayor
The cost and availability of childcare is a serious challenge for London families who currently pay on average 34% more for their childcare than families outside of London. The high cost of childcare also impacts directly on maternal employment rates (which are 10 percentage points lower in London than the rest of the UK) and is a driver of child poverty.
In my manifesto, I said I would work to make London's childcare offer more affordable and accessible. I want to support London's childcare providers to provide a high quality and affordable offer through, for example, cost reductions and workforce retention. I will also work with London boroughs and others to provide and showcase innovative models of delivery. We will also look at targeted support for the families who need it most, and work with government to ensure that childcare policy works for London. I am looking forward to beginning that work in the coming months.
Congestion - Economic Impact Question No: 2016/2226 Fiona Twycross Has TfL undertaken any research into the economic impact of congestion?
The Mayor
Previous analysis has suggested that increasing congestion could cost London's economy £4bn per year. Further work to understand the impact of congestion will be undertaken in preparation of a new Mayor's Transport Strategy. Air Pollution - Economic Impact Question No: 2016/2227 Fiona Twycross Has TfL undertaken any research into the economic impact of air pollution on London's economy?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
TfL has undertaken research into the economic costs of the health impacts caused by air pollution. The research estimates an annual economic cost of up to £3.7 billion, made up of the cost of treatment, lost work hours and concern and inconvenience to family members.
The full report is available to download here: https://www.london.gov.uk/file/2475
Business Advisory Board Question No: 2016/2228 Fiona Twycross Will you commit to appoint representatives from the co-operative and third sectors to your Business Advisory Board?
The Mayor
The Business Advisory Board will be made up of individuals working in the private sector. The Terms of Reference and membership of the Business Board are yet to be finalised.
Supporting the Co-operative Sector Question No: 2016/2229 Fiona Twycross How will you support London's co-operative and mutual sector?
The Mayor
Once my Business Advisory Board has been established, I will ask them to identify the best way of engaging with a range of businesses including co-operatives and mutual sector. Visa Rules Question No: 2016/2230 Fiona Twycross Please provide more details on the changes to the visa system you would like to see to allow the brightest and best to come to London?
The Mayor
It is vital the London remains open to creative, talented and experienced people from around the world. Two areas of the visa system I would encourage the government to consider again:
the special case of the creative sector if and when the government amends the current salary thresholds (as recommended by the Migration Advisory Committee in its review of Tier 2)
the increased competition London universities face in recruiting international students and the UK's reputation as a welcoming country.
I am committed to working with the government to ensure London remains open and competitive.
Infrastructure Question No: 2016/2231 Fiona Twycross What are your core infrastructure priorities for London and how will you engage all Londoners in making them happen?
The Mayor
I want London's infrastructure to help realise the priorities on which I was elected, which include housing delivery, jobs growth, ensuring a fairer and more equitable city, and environmental improvements.
I will use my office to advocate improved strategic oversight and coordination, planning and delivery and I intend to work with infrastructure providers, business and government to ensure infrastructure investments are prioritised based on the benefits they provide to Londoners.
I want to secure additional investment in transformative schemes that will support growth such as Crossrail 2. I will communicate to Londoners these infrastructure priorities, the expected benefits and progress on delivery. Young Londoners leaving London Question No: 2016/2232 Fiona Twycross The number of 30-39 year olds migrating out of London has increased year on year since 2012. How do you intend to ensure that London maintains its skilled workers whilst at the same time ensuring that young Londoners are provided with the skills and mentoring required to keep London's economy progressing?
The Mayor
As London develops its wider plans for skills devolution, the area review of skills is exploring how well the supply of skills in the capital is meeting demand.
I will call upon my new Skills for Londoners taskforce to lead on taking forward recommendations of the review. I will also ask them to see how LEP capital investment in the skills system and access to Adult Learning Loans can support learners in training and/or re- training in the skills that will support London's economy.
ESOL in London Question No: 2016/2233 Fiona Twycross Can you detail the costs and benefits to the London regional economy of government funding for ESOL courses?
The Mayor
English language skills are key to enabling Londoners to achieve their full potential, contribute fully to the community they live in, access services and feel part of local decision-making. Almost a quarter of a million working age Londoners can't speak English well or at all, so there is a high need for ESOL courses in the capital. These courses help Londoners to access the opportunities this great city has to offer, bringing social and economic benefits. I am therefore concerned about the impact of central government cuts to ESOL funding. The detail of ESOL costs currently sits with central government but I am negotiating a skills devolution deal for 2018/19 which would include funding for ESOL. Widening participation in Higher Education Question No: 2016/2234 Fiona Twycross Given the importance to London's economy of a highly-skilled, graduate workforce, how will you work with London's universities to ensure that people from disadvantaged backgrounds in the capital can continue to access Higher Education, in light of the Government's removal of maintenance grants?
The Mayor
London has the highest percentage of graduates of any major city and demand for higher level skills will continue to grow. Our universities are vital to developing this talent.
I am immensely proud of London's higher education sector: whether you are going to become a leading physicist or Mayor of the greatest city in the world, London's universities provide life changing opportunities. I want to work with our universities, colleges and schools to make sure young people across the city get the chances that I had. This includes providing high quality careers advice as part of the London Ambitions' strategy, inspiring girls into tech and developing degree apprenticeship routes. Apprenticeship completions Question No: 2016/2235 Fiona Twycross The Skills Funding released apprenticeship achievement figures in London up to 2013/14 earlier in the year which indicate only half of the apprenticeships started are completed each year since 2012. The previous Mayor responded to say that they would become available in May 2016. Can you obtain the latest figures up until 2015/16 in London, by quarter, since 2013/14?
The Mayor
The Skills Funding Agency (SFA) Apprenticeship Qualification Achievement Rates, is publically available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/sfa-national-achievement- rates-tables-2014-to-2015. This measures how many learners that started an apprenticeship qualification went on to successfully complete one, previously known as 'success rates'.
Further information on this measure is available in the 2016 BIS statistical first release published by the SFA: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/learner-participation- outcomes-and-level-of-highest-qualification-held
The quarterly 'achievement figures' since 2013/14 that the GLA have available are as follows:
All age apprenticeship achievements 2013/14 Q1 5,040 2013/14 Q2 4,230 2013/14 Q3 4,570 2013/14 Q4 6,920 2013/14 total 20,760 2014/15 Q1 5,530 2014/15 Q2 4,780 2014/15 Q3 4,950 2014/15 Q4 6,810 2014/15 total 22,070
Construction skills Question No: 2016/2236 Fiona Twycross How will you address the skills shortages, particularly higher level skills, in the construction sector?
The Mayor
The Area Review of skills, as part of the wider skills devolution, is exploring how well the supply of skills is meeting demand. GLA officers will be paying special attention to the supply of skills that serve the needs of the construction sector, as part of their work on the Area Review process.
Additionally, in my manifesto I proposed the creation of a construction academy scheme to provide more skilled construction workers for London. I will use the skills devolution process and call upon my new Skills for Londoners taskforce to lead in taking forward plans for the academy scheme.
Fair pay for under 25s Question No: 2016/2237 Fiona Twycross Do you agree that it is unfair for under 25s to be paid a lower National Minimum Wage for the same job, just because they are younger?
The Mayor
I would like to see all Londoners - including those under 25 - paid at least the Living Wage and I will encourage as many London employers as possible to become Living Wage accredited. Ensuring No Child is Left Behind in London Question No: 2016/2238 Fiona Twycross The London Child Poverty Commission noted in 2008 that the underlying causes of poverty in London were due to low maternal employment rates as a result of the lack of quality part-time jobs and flexible childcare, as well as higher housing childcare and housing costs. Do you welcome the report by 4in10 'Ensuring No Child is Left Behind in London: Recommendations for the Mayor' to tackle child poverty?
The Mayor
I congratulate 4 in10 on its work highlighting the unacceptably high levels of child poverty in London.
Low levels of maternal employment and the cost and availability of childcare remain significant barriers to tackling child poverty. In addition, the nature of child poverty has changed over the past decade with the situation in London increasingly characterised by in-work poverty linked to low pay and underemployment, high housing costs, welfare reforms and immigration policy.
It is important to address all of these drivers of child poverty. I look forward to working with civil society initiatives such as 4in10, along with employers, central government, boroughs, housing associations, and Londoners themselves to bring a concerted focus to child poverty.
Overcrowding Question No: 2016/2239 Fiona Twycross 391,000 of London's children live in overcrowded homes, up 18% since 2008, which is 24% of all children in the capital. Overcrowding affects children's education, but it also contributes to poor mental and physical health, the most overcrowded boroughs also have increasing incidences of tuberculosis and respiratory illnesses. Will you commit to tackling overcrowding to ensure that every child in London is able to reach their full potential?
The Mayor
Overcrowding is, I agree, a grave concern. It is best tacked by increasing the supply of homes, particularly of homes that are genuinely affordable to families, too many of whom are currently stuck in accommodation that's too small for them.
Doing so is my biggest single priority as Mayor. Childcare Costs Question No: 2016/2240 Fiona Twycross Since 2008 the cost of childcare in the capital has soared. A nursery place is now 59% more expensive for a child under 2 than in 2008 and a childminder is 65% more expensive for a child under 2 years old. Will you lobby for an increase in the rate from DfE for the delivery of the 30 hours offer following the increase in funding that York Council recently agreed for the pilot there?
The Mayor
I agree that the rising cost of childcare in London is a key issue and, as highlighted in the recent survey by the Family and Childcare Trust, London's childcare costs are 34% above the national average. In addition, there is less informal childcare available to London families and working parents in London tend to commute for longer. All of this impacts of the cost of childcare for London families.
It is encouraging that the DfE listened and responded to the concerns of the 30 York providers who were involved in the childcare pilot, and increased the rate appropriately.
I will work with government to ensure that childcare policy works for London, including the delivery of the new 30 hour entitlement.
Family Friendly and Flexible Working Arrangements Question No: 2016/2241 Fiona Twycross 60% of mothers work in London compared to 69% in the rest of England. Will you commit to ensuring that the GLA Group and Family offer family-friendly and flexible working arrangements and apprenticeships to employees and subcontracted staff, leading by example to make London a family friendly city.
The Mayor
I absolutely believe that we should offer flexible working options and family friendly benefits in all GLA group organisations where it is possible to do this without compromising service delivery.
I know the GLA already offers generous family friendly benefits to staff, including enhanced maternity, paternity, special leave and shared parental leave policies. The GLA now advertises 90% of its roles as open to flexible working and 15% of the workforce already work in a formal flexible working arrangement.
I will encourage all GLA group organisations to lead the way in promoting these policies. MOPAC Review of Leeds Sex Work Pilot Question No: 2016/2242 Andrew Boff Pursuant to question 2016/1647, when will MOPAC complete their review of the evaluation of the managed area of street sex work pilot conducted by Leeds Council?
The Mayor
MOPAC has now looked at the evaluation of the Leeds Council managed area of street sex work pilot that was undertaken by the University of Leeds.
Street-based developments Question No: 2016/2243 Andrew Boff Will you meet with 'Create Streets'?
The Mayor
My officers have and continue to meet with Create Streets regularly.
Affordable housing Question No: 2016/2244 Andrew Boff When will you publish your definition of 'genuinely affordable'?
The Mayor
I will set out further details on my approach to providing genuinely affordable housing in the coming months, including by consulting on new London Plan Supplementary Planning Guidance on affordable housing.
Housing Zones Question No: 2016/2245 (Oral) 2 Commitments Andrew Boff What are your future plans for Housing Zones in London?
The Mayor
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. London desperately needs more genuinely affordable homes after the failed legacy of Boris Johnson. Last year just 13% of homes given planning permission were affordable housing and the former Mayor delivered the lowest number of new affordable homes since records began in 1991: 4,880.
It is going to take a long time to turn things around and, to do it, it is essential that we work with councils, housing associations, developers, investors, businesses and central Government to bring forward new and affordable homes. We will use any effective means to accelerate housing delivery. Therefore, where Housing Zones are working and are succeeding in accelerating and unlocking housing supply, we will support them. One of their strengths is their focus not just on direct investment in affordable housing but also on acquiring land and funding infrastructure to support housing delivery. This use of funding to support and unlock new homes is an important part of the approach we want to take.
There are now, Chairman, 31 Housing Zones all across the capital. I want to review the programme in detail, aiming to increase the level of affordable housing where we can, and to address concerns about how much time it is taking to sign some of the contracts and get on with the delivery. Ahead of the review, I will support Housing Zones where they are in place and bring forward homes whilst being clear about my priorities. Just last week, for example, GLA officers proposed to sign off the due diligence that would implement a previous mayoral decision to give £50 million to support the Hounslow Town Centre Housing Zone. My team agreed that directors could sign this off on the basis that discussions would continue with the housing association involved to raise the current 40% affordable housing on offer to my long- term goal of 50%. My team will review Housing Zones in detail and ensure we use them to work closely with boroughs to deliver the homes Londoners need.
Andrew Boff AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor. Is it fair to say that you will be building on the legacy of Housing Zones that was left to you?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): As I said in my answer, which I am happy to repeat, we are going to review Housing Zones. In the meantime, we are going to work with those Housing Zones where the work has already been undertaken to make sure that we can get on and deliver those homes.
Andrew Boff AM: When do you anticipate that review being completed, sir?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): It is a work in progress and I am hoping to do it sooner rather than later so that we can get on with building the homes we need.
Andrew Boff AM: It is a work in progress that has no end date. Is that correct?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): The important thing is to review what has taken place, to build on what has worked well and to change what is not working well. Once the review has been undertaken, I am happy to write to you and give you an update on that.
Andrew Boff AM: That is extraordinarily kind of you. I just wondered whether or not you anticipated that this review would be done in a month, a year, two years or four years?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I hope within the next few months.
Andrew Boff AM: In the next few months; less than six?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): In the next few months.
Andrew Boff AM: How do you define a “few”? For you, sir, what is a “few”? Three? Seven? Six? Stop me when I hit the right number. Two? How long is a “few months”?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): In the next few months.
Andrew Boff AM: Very good. From your comments, Mr Mayor, you indicated that you looked at the previous Mayor’s last year of his housing programme and you criticised it on that last year. Would it be OK for our group after four years to pick-and-choose a year from your legacy and judge your entire housing programme on the basis of one year? Fair is fair. Would that be a fair thing for us to do?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Assembly Member, you will do as you please.
Andrew Boff AM: We certainly shall. You quoted from one year of your predecessor. Do you accept that over eight years 104,000 affordable homes were built?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): It depends on how you define “affordable”.
Andrew Boff AM: The definition of “affordable” is established. Your definition is not established; your predecessor’s was.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Quite. What he may have thought of as being affordable is not affordable to the Londoners that I have talked to.
Andrew Boff AM: He did build 104,000 by his definition of “affordable housing”?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): He may well have built a certain number of homes. Whether they are affordable or not is a moot point, is it not?
Andrew Boff AM: OK. In your intro, Mr Mayor, you criticised the amount of homes being built on foreign investment. Will you throughout your term be distracting from your lack of targets by blaming foreigners?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I do not understand the question.
Andrew Boff AM: Will you throughout your term of office be distracting Londoners from the fact that you have no targets by blaming foreigners?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I blame the previous Mayor--
Andrew Boff AM: Clearly, Mr Mayor, you have indicated that the Mayor may have fallen short on homes first sold to Londoners. Is this criticism of foreigners going to be a consistent part of your future housing programme?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Let me be clear. My criticism is of a Mayor who claimed that he would have an agreement with developers to stop homes being sold overseas before they have been marketed here. All I ‑‑
Andrew Boff AM: You have no problem with foreigners buying homes at the moment, Mr Mayor? That is what I am trying to get to.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am trying to answer the question. What I discovered is that the GLA has no process to monitor what is going on. We have no way, no power and no process to do anything about it and no effective sanction. That is what I criticise. I do not criticise foreigners. Some of my best friends and family are foreigners.
Andrew Boff AM: I just wondered whether or not you might be changing your party allegiance to the UK Independence Party (UKIP). It just seems like the next logical step for you, blaming foreigners for a lack of policies. No? No. OK.
Finally, Mr Mayor, when are we likely to hear of your definition of “affordable housing”?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I have already explained what I mean by affordable homes in London.
Andrew Boff AM: You have defined that? Is that something that is accessible on the london.gov.uk website, what your definition of “affordable homes” is?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): If it is not, I can write to you again because that is the sort of guy I am.
Andrew Boff AM: You can write to me to say where it is or you can write to me to say when it will be there?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): It is already publicly available but, if you need help finding it, I can write to you.
Andrew Boff AM: I certainly would like help because at the last meeting we had you seemed not to know what your definition of “affordable homes” actually is.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am quite clear. I can answer you now and use up more of your time ‑‑
Andrew Boff AM: Yes, please. Go ahead.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): ‑‑ or I can write to you and so ‑‑
Andrew Boff AM: No, let us do it now because it is obviously brief.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): The way I define homes that are affordable for London, in relation to my target of having half of the homes in developments being affordable, is with one of three things.
They are either homes where you pay a social rent. Think of them as council homes. The formula for the rent is based upon a manual worker’s salary. It is a different salary and a different rent depending on where you are in London. That is a social rent.
There is a second type of affordable homes, which are homes where you pay a London Living Rent. That is at a third of average earnings. All of the experts say that an affordable home is where the rent or the mortgage is a third of household earnings.
The third part of the affordable homes that I talk about is homes that are in shared ownership. That is part-buy/part-rent. We are doing some modelling work after fast-tracking some TfL land - because of the errors of the last Mayor, who did not do that - to make sure that we can see how many shared ownership homes we can build on TfL land. For the shared ownership homes, you will pay a deposit and then you will pay a rent and a mortgage in relation to the shared ownership.
Therefore, that is what I mean by the suite of affordable homes that I want to have on developments.
Andrew Boff AM: Those homes that fall outside that definition of “affordable homes” will not be counted as affordable homes in your target?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): No, there are other submarket properties as well. I gave you the ‑‑
Andrew Boff AM: You had better post me the link if it is going to become a tome with your definition of “affordable homes”.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Sorry?
Andrew Boff AM: If you could send me a link, I do not want to take up too much more time. This seems like a very long definition of “affordable homes” and so perhaps it would be better if you sent me a link.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Sure, but it is really important that we have a diversity of housing supply to meet the needs of all Londoners because I am going to be, as you know, a Mayor for all Londoners.
Andrew Boff AM: I just wanted to know what your definition of “affordable homes” is--
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I did offer a few minutes ago to write to you.
Andrew Boff AM: You can send that to me? Thank you very much, sir. I appreciate it.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): That is the sort of guy I am. Housing supply Question No: 2016/2246 Andrew Boff How many of the 'wrong' types of homes have been built over the past eight years?
The Mayor
Not everyone will have the same definition of right and wrong as I do, but it is clear that over the past eight years that not nearly enough homes were built and not enough of them have been genuinely affordable.
Community Land Trusts Question No: 2016/2247 Andrew Boff How many new Community Land Trusts do you intend to deliver in London, and what are your plans for achieving this?
The Mayor
I am aware that there are a number of new CLT proposals within London and over the coming weeks I will review how I can best support these proposals and also promote other CLTs in London.
Tall buildings Question No: 2016/2248 Andrew Boff What additional measures will you introduce to resist inappropriate tall buildings?
The Mayor
In revising the London Plan I will assess how effective the existing Plan has been in resisting inappropriate tall buildings and consider additional measures if these are necessary. Boycott Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) Question No: 2016/2249 Andrew Boff The Governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo, recently signed an executive order mandating any agency under his control to divest from companies which are aligned to a boycott of the State of Israel. Will you take similar action to prevent the GLA from doing business with any organisation that aligns with or promotes BDS?
The Mayor
The Crown Commercial Services Procurement Policy Note (PPN) 01/16 sets out contracting authorities' international obligations when letting public contracts. It makes clear that boycotts in public procurement are inappropriate, outside where formal legal sanctions, embargoes and restrictions have been put in place by the UK Government. GLA and TfL are complying with this policy.
The PPN can be found here: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/500811/P PN_on_wider_international_obligations.pdf
NHS Resources in London (1) Question No: 2016/2250 Andrew Boff When are you planning to meet the Government to make the "strongest possible case" for the resources you believe the NHS in London needs?
The Mayor
I will make the case for London at every opportunity. Although my chair of the London Health Board which oversees devolution, I will work with partners to make the case for resources for London.
Work in the five health and care devolution pilots is underway and I expect clarity on the 'asks' of government over the summer. I expect to make an announcement during the later part of this calendar year. NHS Resources in London (2) Question No: 2016/2251 Andrew Boff Who are you planning to meet from the Government to make the "strongest possible case" for the resources you believe the NHS in London needs?
The Mayor
As per MQ 2016 /2250 my office will schedule a series of meetings with Government Minsters and with signatories to the London Health and Care Devolution Agreement signed in December 2015. These meeting(s) are not currently in the diary.
Health Devolution Question No: 2016/2252 Andrew Boff What specific measures are you going to take, through devolution, to create a "parity of esteem between physical and mental health and illnesses" as pledged in your manifesto?
The Mayor
As chair of the London Health Board, I will work with NHS partners and local government to oversee health and healthcare in London. Through the London health devolution agreements, London is exploring how devolution could work in practice. The devolution pilots, including those in Hackney and Lewisham which both focus on integration of mental and physical health services, will inform what additional powers London requires to address the historic disparity between physical and mental health services. I will be both a champion for London's NHS and for mental health, ensuring that mental health is high on the city's agenda and that London has the powers it needs to best address some of London's unique mental health needs.
Health Devolution Meetings Question No: 2016/2253 Andrew Boff Pursuant to question 2016/1645 where you stated that you "look forward to working with local government and health and care leaders to ensure that devolution enables London to improve our mental and physical health and wellbeing", what date will you be meeting with local government and health and care leaders?
The Mayor
I will chair the next meeting of the London Health Board on 28 June 2016. Dementia Friendly Capital Question No: 2016/2254 Andrew Boff Do you support the Alzheimer's Society's campaign to make London the first 'dementia- friendly' capital city by 2020?
The Mayor
I support the Alzheimer's Society's ambition for London to be the first dementia-friendly capital city in the world because everyone living with dementia should be able to access the high-quality and compassionate support they need. I have proposed that they meet with GLA health officers to discuss the challenges of dementia in London.
As London Health Board Chair I am committed to improving public health and reducing health inequalities, including ensuring that all Londoners have access to integrated, quality health services. Importantly, the new London Health Inequalities Strategy, in development with stakeholders, will build on Better Health for London and the London Health and Care Devolution Agreements and move London towards being a more dementia-friendly city.
HIV Awareness in London Question No: 2016/2255 Andrew Boff Surveys conducted by the National AIDS Trust indicate that knowledge and understanding of HIV transmission is declining. What specific steps are you going to take to raise awareness of HIV within London?
The Mayor
I am aware of this report and share concerns about the need to improve awareness and so boost prevention of HIV. This is one of the issues I will be raising with Public Health England and other partners to ensure we get effective and appropriate messages to all target audiences.
Cost Benefit Ratios Question No: 2016/2256 Andrew Boff Please update the Assembly on the cost benefit ratio for Crossrail 2, the Sutton Tramlink, HS2, the Bakerloo Line Extension and the Silvertown Crossing?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
The benefit cost ratio (BCR) is an attempt to quantify a scheme's benefits in a range of categories and compare it to its costs. It is just one metric for assessing the value for money offered by a transport scheme and is not always the best metric to use for comparing schemes, particularly where there are wider objectives which are not quantified in the BCR, such as the number of new homes and jobs unlocked. Costs, benefits and hence the BCR are also subject to change as schemes develop, so it is difficult to compare projects at different stages.
Crossrail 2
BCR: 1.7 to 2.7 (with wider benefits):1
Crossrail 2 is designed to address transport capacity constraints and provide vital new connections to unlock employment in and around central London. It could unlock 200,000 new jobs and 200,000 new homes.
Sutton Tramlink Extension:
BCR: 1.3:1 (South Wimbledon to Sutton Town Centre via Morden Road)
This is designed to help shape the growth of an area of outer London with potential to accommodate additional housing if supported by improved public transport accessibility.
High Speed 2:
BCR: Phase 1 (London - Birmingham): 1.7:1; Phase 2 (Extensions to Manchester and Leeds): 2.5:1
The Government's HS2 business case focuses on the economic impacts of reduced inter-city journey times and additional capacity. In addition, there is an estimated £15 billion in wider economic benefits arising from productivity gains.
Bakerloo line Extension:
BCR: 2:1 to 3:1 (Extension to Lewisham via Old Kent Rd)
TfL is currently undertaking detailed technical work focused on options around a route to Lewisham which is aimed primarily at unlocking up to 25,000 homes as well as regeneration of a deprived area of inner London.
Silvertown Crossing: Net Present Value £1.23bn
For schemes that are financially positive (in this case as a result of the user charging) Government guidance recommends that Net Present Value should be used, not a BCR.
A new tunnel at Silvertown will relieve congestion and delays on the approaches to the Blackwall Tunnel providing substantial economic benefits through improve network reliability. The capital cost will be funded by user charging and the scheme is therefore financially positive. This means a BCR cannot be calculated as that would require dividing the benefits by a negative cost. The Net Present Value indicates that the scheme has a very positive economic outcome. Nominee Passes Review Question No: 2016/2257 (Oral) 1 Commitments Gareth Bacon A recent TfL press release stated that you have ordered a review of free travel for the nominee passes of staff earning a base salary over £100,000 a year. Will you commit to extending this review to cover the nominee passes of all TfL staff?
The Mayor
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Assembly Member Bacon. I have instructed TfL’s Commissioner, Mike Brown, to undertake a root-and-branch review of TfL. He agrees with me that we need to make TfL much more efficient and affordable. What I have said to the Commissioner is that for those 184 staff who earn a base salary over £100,000 a year, we should look at the perks they get. I want to make sure that if they take on any further staff with high salaries, it goes past me first.
I do not believe we should extend the review to cover nominee passes of all TfL staff. These passes are a longstanding benefit for staff and have existed in their current form since 2002. The previous Mayor also did not change this benefit. The passes benefit thousands of frontline staff, including bus drivers employed by the bus companies, who work to keep London moving every day. The saving involved in removing all the passes is relatively modest. However, it is right that we look at the perks of those who earn more than £100,000. The full results of the root-and-branch review will form part of my revised Transport Plan for London to be published in the autumn.
Gareth Bacon AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor. We support you looking at the nominee pass issue. It is something that we called for over a number of years under the previous Mayor. We disagreed with him on that and there were members of other political parties who were in the same boat that we were. What is the rationale for setting the figure at £100,000?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am sure you followed the very exciting mayoral contest with keen interest and one of the points I made was about the numbers of TfL staff earning big salaries. We need to make it fit for purpose, get rid of waste and make future savings to have a freeze of TfL fares over the next four years. As I have said, we need to look at those staff who are earning the highest amount of salary to make sure we are getting value for money. That is why ‑‑
Gareth Bacon AM: OK, in summary - and I am not trying to trip you up with this - it is an arbitrary figure, because £100,000 is a lot of money and so anything north of that you think it is fair to look at? Is that the rationale for it?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): The rationale is that it is legitimate to look at the perks of those earning more than £100,000, yes.
Gareth Bacon AM: OK. It was not done as a way of raising additional revenue for TfL?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): It makes a modest saving, but I want to look at all perks that high-earning staff are receiving. It is a base salary of £100,000. That does not include the other ‑‑
Gareth Bacon AM: That is fine, Mr Mayor. It is probably additional income rather than a saving because people would have to pay for their travel rather than getting it for nothing.
You mentioned in the answer to the question initially that it would be relatively modest “savings” - and, again, you used the word - for TfL if all nominee passes were taken out. What figure has TfL given you for that?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I do not have it to hand, but I am sure we can find that out.
Gareth Bacon AM: Sure. When we have questioned TfL on this at length over, as I say, many years, initially it said there was no additional revenue and then when pushed said it would be around about £10 million. It was literally as loose as that in the answer. We calculated in our budget submission that over the last two years it would be in excess of £20 million of additional revenue that comes to TfL. I am very happy to write to you and share with you the calculation whereby we came up with that.
If those numbers are correct, Mr Mayor, given the shortfall currently of £500 million - and again, we dispute this figure, but let us accept it for the moment - of your fares freeze, should this not be something you would include as a way of closing the gap between the £120 million that Mr Brown identified two weeks ago and the £640 million that you need to find in order to fund your fares freeze?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): There are a number of presumptions in the question, but why do you not write to me and I will look at your figures and then we can look at it again? I am quite confident, having spent time with the Commissioner and having a brilliant Deputy Mayor for Transport, that we will find all the savings we need to undertake the TfL freeze for four years without making ‑‑
Gareth Bacon AM: We are of course waiting for the detail on that and that is fine because you are just starting. It is OK. However, this is a significant number, Mr Mayor. Spread over the four years, it could amount to close to £90 million out of the £520 million that you still need to identify. To be very clear, we are talking about the nominee passes, not the passes of TfL employees. You mentioned bus drivers and other people who benefit from this. We are not talking about the people who work for TfL; we are talking about the people who live with them ‑‑
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Sure, sure.
Gareth Bacon AM: ‑‑ and who get free travel at the expense of the taxpayer. We maintain that that is not a legitimate perk for anybody to have and I would encourage you very much, Mr Mayor - and you have started on the right lines with this - to go further because there is a gain to TfL if you do. I am inviting you to agree with me, Mr Mayor.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): All right. I think you are going to write to me.
Gareth Bacon AM: I will write to you. Thank you, Mr Mayor. TfL Business Plan assumptions (1) Question No: 2016/2258 Gareth Bacon What assumptions, including the related cash estimates, were made in TfL reaching the £1.9 billion estimate in relation to freezing fares in TfL's Five Year 2014 business plan?
The Mayor
Please see my answer to MQ 2016 /1891.
TfL Business Plan assumptions (2) Question No: 2016/2259 Gareth Bacon What assumptions, including the related cash estimates, were made by TfL in reaching the £640 million estimate in relation to freezing fares?
The Mayor
Please see my answer to MQ 2016/ 1891.
TfL inflation assumptions (1) Question No: 2016/2260 Gareth Bacon In the TfL Five Year 2014 business plan RPI was set to 1.9% for 2015 and 3.5% thereafter. How did TfL develop these assumptions?
The Mayor
RPI forecasts used by TfL are based on a range of independent forecasts available at the time, from banks, the Office for Budget Responsibility, Bank of England and GLA Economics.
TfL inflation assumptions (2) Question No: 2016/2261 Gareth Bacon When exactly did TfL develop estimates that had RPI set to 1.9% for 2015 and 3.5% thereafter?
The Mayor
The inflation estimates were set at the start of the Business Planning process in the summer of 2014. TfL inflation assumptions (3) Question No: 2016/2262 Gareth Bacon On what basis was the estimate of RPI for 2015 at 1.9% and 3.5% thereafter made?
The Mayor
Please see my answer to MQ 2016 /2260.
TfL inflation assumptions (4) Question No: 2016/2263 Gareth Bacon On what basis was the estimate of RPI at 3.5% for the 3 years made?
The Mayor
Please see my answer to MQ 2016 /2260.
TfL inflation assumptions (5) Question No: 2016/2264 Gareth Bacon What expectations do you have relating to the level of that RPI in the new transport plan due for publication in the autumn?
The Mayor
Please see my answer to MQ 2016 /2260.
Cost of freezing fares (1) Question No: 2016/2265 Gareth Bacon How much will it cost to freeze all TfL fares excluding Travelcards for 2 years?
The Mayor
Please see my answer to MQ 2016 /2270. Cost of freezing fares (2) Question No: 2016/2266 Gareth Bacon How much will it cost to freeze all TfL fares including Travelcards for 2 years?
The Mayor
Please see my answer to MQ 2016 /2270.
Cost of freezing fares (3) Question No: 2016/2267 Gareth Bacon How much will it cost to freeze all TfL fares excluding Travelcards for 4 years?
The Mayor
Please see my answer to MQ 2016 /2270.
Cost of freezing fares (4) Question No: 2016/2268 Gareth Bacon How much will it cost to freeze all TfL fares including Travelcards for 4 years?
The Mayor
Please see my answer to MQ 2016 /2270.
Cost of freezing fares (5) Question No: 2016/2269 Gareth Bacon How much will it cost to freeze all TfL fares excluding Travelcards for 5 years?
The Mayor
Please see my answer to MQ 2016 /2270. Cost of freezing fares (6) Question No: 2016/2270 Gareth Bacon How much will it cost to freeze all TfL fares including Travelcards for 5 years?
The Mayor
My manifesto commitment was to freeze all TfL fares, funded from cost reduction at TfL identified in a root-and-branch review of the organisation. I am urging the DfT and Train Operating Companies to do the same or to transfer services to me.
The table below shows estimates for the value of revenue from TfL fares for each year over the next five years when the fares I control are frozen from January 2017, and if the DfT and Train Operating Companies follow my lead and do the same. The table includes the total estimates for two, four and five years.
These can, however, only ever be estimates. The actual values will be determined by the actual path of a range of variables including inflation and ridership.
Reductions in TfL fares revenue from freezing fares TfL fares frozen TfL and TfL revenue from Travelcards frozen Year (£m) (£m) 2016/17 14 21 2017/18 90 136 2018/19 200 316 2019/20 336 532 2020/21 470 761
Total 2016/17 to 104 157 2017/18 Total 2016/17 to 640 1,005 2019/20 Total 2016/17 to 1,100 1,766 2020/21
Compensation to train operating companies (1) Question No: 2016/2271 Gareth Bacon Should TfL decide to freeze all TfL fares including Travelcards and Pay as You Go Oyster and contactless daily caps, what level of compensation would be required by train operating companies?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28/06/2016
My manifesto commitment was to freeze all TfL fares, funded from cost reduction at TfL identified in a root-and-branch review of the organisation. I am urging the DfT and Train Operating Companies to do the same, funded in the same way, or to transfer services to me. I am not offering to compensate them.
Compensation to train operating companies (2) Question No: 2016/2272 Gareth Bacon What processes have historically been in place to compensate train operating companies for any restriction in the increased cost of Travelcards?
The Mayor
There is no precedent for a restriction of this kind.
Compensation to train operating companies (3) Question No: 2016/2273 Gareth Bacon Does TfL compensate train operating companies in order to recognise the 60+ oyster card, if so by how much?
The Mayor
Train Operating Companies only accept the 60+ Oyster Card after 09:30 on weekdays and at weekends and on public holidays. To date, it has proved impossible to reach an agreement covering the weekday morning peak at a reasonable cost.
In the current year, compensation to Train Operating Companies for the acceptance of the 60+ Oyster Card is expected to be around £8m. TfL Five Year business plan (1) Question No: 2016/2274 Gareth Bacon How much does the decision to not freeze Travelcards reduce the estimated cost to TfL when compared to the estimates within the Five Year 2014 business plan?
The Mayor
Please see my answer to MQ 2016 /1891.
TfL Five Year business plan (2) Question No: 2016/2275 Gareth Bacon Why was the proposal to freeze all fares, including Travelcards, in TfL's Five Year 2014 business plan but is not included within TfL's current assumptions?
The Mayor
The previous Mayor did not propose any fares freeze, he put fares up by 42 per cent and planned to increase them by another 17 per cent over the next four years.
TfL Savings Question No: 2016/2276 Gareth Bacon TfL currently has identified a maximum of £117 million worth of savings, how will the remaining £523 million in savings needed to be found without affecting the investment London transport network needs?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
These plans will be fully set out in my new Transport Plan for London later in the year. TfL Website Question No: 2016/2277 Gareth Bacon Why are Travelcards included on the TfL Fares webpage (https://tfl.gov.uk/fares-and- payments/fares) when they are not considered by you to be TfL Fares?
The Mayor
While Travelcard prices are not determined by me, they are purchased by TfL customers and it is important that information is available to them to make comparisons and choose the best value ticket for their travel.
DNA Database Question No: 2016/2278 Keith Prince How many DNA samples and fingerprints belonging to individuals not convicted of a crime are currently held by the Metropolitan Police Service?
The Mayor
Please see my response to MQ 2016/ 2280.
Removal of data from DNA Database (1) Question No: 2016/2279 Keith Prince How many entries belonging to individuals not convicted of an offence has the Metropolitan Police Service removed from the DNA database in each year since 2012?
The Mayor
The data collection for this question requires a lengthy query of the Police National Computer. The MPS is not able to provide this in the time available to answer.
It will be provided as soon as it can be identified. Removal of data from DNA database (2) Question No: 2016/2280 Keith Prince How can Londoners, who have had their DNA and fingerprints taken by the Metropolitan Police Service and not been convicted of an offence, ensure they have been removed from the DNA database?
The Mayor
DNA samples and fingerprints are held on the national DNA database, which is owned by the Home Office.
Although police forces, including the MPS, are responsible for inputting and deleting samples, the samples are held nationally. Oversight and policies relating to the database are the responsibility of the Home Office and National Police Chiefs' Council through the National DNA database board.
Statistics on the volume of samples can be found on the www.gov.uk website but are not available at police force level.
Applications for deletion of records are made using a national application form. The form and national guidance is available at http://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dna-early- deletion-guidance-and-application-form.
To confirm if a record has been deleted, Londoners can write to the MPS through a Subject Access Request via the Early Deletion Unit at 17th floor, Empress State Building, Lille Road, London SW6 1TR.
Metropolitan Police Service Freedom of Information support system Question No: 2016/2281 Keith Prince What assessments have you, MOPAC and the Metropolitan Police Service made of the decision by Bedfordshire Police, Cambridgeshire Constabulary and Hertfordshire Constabulary to jointly tender for a case management system and support for Freedom of Information requests, and would you consider encouraging the Metropolitan Police Service to take similar steps with neighbouring forces?
The Mayor
Collaborative working with other Police Services has advantages, including increased resilience and economies of scale. It is also an option in achieving savings.
The three Police Services are yet to commence the contract you refer to. The tender process closed less than a month ago and therefore it is currently too early for any assessments to have taken place. Unintentional prejudice Question No: 2016/2282 Keith Prince What processes do MOPAC and the Metropolitan Police Service have in place to assist officers in tackling unconscious bias?
The Mayor
Unconscious bias is a specific part of the MPS training syllabus and is delivered in the following areas:
The Commissioner's Leadership Programme, delivered to all Met officers at Sergeant and Inspector rank (approx. 6,560 officers).
The Sergeant promotion course, Inspector's promotion course and Superintendents promotion course.
The 'Leading for London' programme.
'Introduction to Unconscious Bias' training delivered to Superintendents, Chief Superintendents and senior police staff.
A new College of Policing training package on stop and search which incorporates recognising unconscious bias is due to be mandated to all officers this year.
Metropolitan Police Service apprenticeships programme Question No: 2016/2283 Keith Prince What involvement have you and MOPAC had in the Metropolitan Police Service's request to the College of Policing to start an accredited apprenticeships scheme?
The Mayor
MOPAC officers have been working with the MPS in their efforts to develop a new apprenticeship scheme.
A Trailblazer group has been established and work continues on the apprentice specification.
I look forward to seeing the future development of the scheme. Knife arches at transport interchanges Question No: 2016/2284 Keith Prince What assessment has you and MOPAC made of the effectiveness of knife arches being placed a major transport interchanges in London?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28/06/2016
Knife crime is a key priority for me as detailed in my manifesto commitments.
Whilst I am confident that knife arches are one of a number of effective deterrents which are in place to support our efforts in tackling knife crime, the policing of London's transport interchanges is the responsibility of the British Transport Police (BTP).
As such the MPS does not direct or measure the policing tactics used at these locations. However, as part of the development of my Police and Crime Plan, MOPAC will engage with a range of partners and stakeholders including the BTP and MPS to better understand effective measures for addressing knife crime in every part of London and to inform and enhance our approach over the next four years.
Broken Campaign Pledges Question No: 2016/2285 (Oral) 2 Supplementary Questions Keith Prince On 4th January this year you wrote "Londoners won't pay a penny more for their travel in 2020 than they do today." What did you mean by that?
The Mayor
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you for the question, Assembly Member Prince.
I am the only candidate who pledged to freeze TfL fares. My manifesto said, I quote, “I will freeze all TfL fares and charges for the Mayor’s cycle hire scheme for four years”, and I have delivered on that promise. The Conservative mayoral candidate intended to carry on with a planned 70% TfL fare hike. I have scrapped the planned 70% hike in TfL fares.
I should add that they have already gone up 42% since 2008. Just looking at some of the fares over the eight years, for example, Chairman, in 2009 bus fares went up by 6.3% and Tube fares by 5.8%, in 2010 there was a 12.7% TfL increase, in 2011 an average 6.8% TfL increase, in 2012 a 5.6% TfL increase, in 2013 4.2%, in 2014 2.7%, in 2015 2.5% and in 2016, election year, only 1%. In total, that is a 41.8% increase in TfL fares in the last eight years. Londoners as a consequence currently pay some of the highest public transport fares anywhere in the world. My four-year fares freeze will make life easier for millions of people. Each January for the last few years Londoners know that TfL fares will go up. No more. I have frozen TfL fares for four years ‑‑
Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): I hesitate to interrupt you, Mr Mayor, but the question did not ask you about a history lesson.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am sorry if you ‑‑
Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): The question simply makes a statement and says, “What did you mean by that?”
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): What I meant by my pledge was looking at the last eight years, understanding that we pay the most expensive fares in all of Europe and explaining why we need to freeze TfL fares going forward.
Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): You have told us that.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): A bus fare today is £1.50 and in 2020 it will remain £1.50. In addition, from this September, your second bus journey within an hour will be free due to my Hopper fare. The daily cap for bus and tram fares will stay the same in 2020. It will be frozen at £4.50. The fare freeze on TfL’s services will put money back into the pockets of Londoners. An average household will save £200 over the four years - for example, regular uses of the bus and tram seven-day pass will save around £400 over the four-year term - and 96% of passengers will benefit from my TfL fares freeze, 7 million all of the time and 4 million some of the time. For example, Assembly Member Prince, in your constituency, a Hornchurch resident working part-time in the centre of London stands to gain around £800 from the freeze of TfL fares to 2020.
I have frozen all of the fares in my power and I am now urging the Department for Transport (DfT) and train operating companies (TOCs) to do the same. I have identified the savings for my first two years already and there is no reason they cannot, too. There is an added reason why the private companies need to respond. On too many lines at the moment, the service to London’s commuters is abysmal. Any fares freeze would not bite until January and so the private companies have seven months to follow my lead.
Keith Prince AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor. My question, though, really was: what did you mean? I am very grateful for the in-depth answer that you have given, but when you on 4 January - I believe it was in the Evening Standard - wrote, “Londoners won’t pay a penny more for their travel in 2020 than they do today”, id you mean that to include or not include Travelcards? Most constituents would think that if you said, “Londoners won’t pay a penny more for their travel in 2020”, they might, albeit erroneously, imagine that that must include any fares that they pay including Travelcards.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I meant that I will freeze all TfL fares and charges.
Keith Prince AM: You did not say that, Mr Mayor. You said, “Londoners won’t pay a penny more”. Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): They will not pay any more for TfL charges.
Keith Prince AM: If you were misunderstood, that is understandable, of course, or if for some reason it was not clear. Do you think that you should apologise to Londoners for that misunderstanding, albeit not something you did intentionally? A number of people in London would have voted for you in the full belief that their Travelcard was not going to be increased up until 2020.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am extremely pleased that I have done in seven weeks what the previous Mayor could not do in eight years, which was to bear down on TfL waste. I will keep the promise of freezing TfL fares not for one year but for four years. I am extremely proud of that. Promise made, promise delivered.
Keith Prince AM: It was very clear in your mind, Mr Mayor, when you made that promise that it would not include Travelcards?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): It is clear in my mind when I make any promise that I talk about the things I have the power to do. I have the power to increase TfL fares, I have the power to freeze TfL fares and so I have frozen TfL fares.
Keith Prince AM: Can you then, Mr Mayor, give us an assurance that you made it very clear to your colleagues on the London Assembly who were also with you standing for election that that promise you made in relation to freezing TfL fares did not include Travelcards? Did you make that clear to your Assembly Member colleagues? Clearly, you did not make it clear to the electorate, which is a bit unfortunate, but did you make it clear to your Assembly Member colleagues?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): The expectation, not unreasonably, that reasonable Assembly Members will have is that if the Mayor of London in seven weeks can find savings to freeze TfL fares, why can the private companies running the commuter trains coming in not do so? If it is the case that the Labour Mayor of London can freeze fares for four years and bear down on waste, why can the Government not bear down on waste in the private companies? That is a reasonable question to ask and I am sure they will be asking that.
Keith Prince AM: A lot of commuters would share your views there and would welcome that comment, but the question is ‑‑
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Do you share those concerns?
Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Honestly, Mr Mayor. He asks you questions; you do not ask him.
Keith Prince AM: Yes, we ask the questions, Mr Mayor. I just want some clarity around this. Did you make it clear to your colleagues that it was only the TfL fares, which are the only ones within your power, that were the ones that you were going to freeze or did you not make that clear to them?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): All of us would hope that the Government will bear down on the private companies to do what I have done. In seven weeks I have managed to bear ‑‑
Keith Prince AM: Did you make that clear to your colleagues?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Let me answer your question the way I would answer it ‑‑
Keith Prince AM: No, hold on one second. It is simple. No, Mr Mayor, it was a closed question.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Sorry, I have been asked a question and it is reasonable for me to be able to answer the question I have been asked.
Keith Prince AM: I have been in sales for years. It is a reasonable question and merely requires a yes or no answer. Did you or did you not brief your Assembly Member colleagues as to whether or not your fares included Travelcards or not?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): The reasonable assumption for most people to make is, if I have managed in seven weeks to make TfL fit for purpose and to freeze fares over four years, how is it that this Government cannot bear down on these private companies, who are ripping off these commuters with awful service, packed trains and fares going up each year? The last Mayor raised fares for TfL by 42% in eight years.
Keith Prince AM: Mr Mayor, thank you very much for that answer.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I do not want to repeat the mistakes he made. I want to be a Mayor for all Londoners.
Keith Prince AM: Thank you. I will take that as a no, then, and that you did not brief your colleagues ‑‑
Jennette Arnold OBE AM (Deputy Chair): What do you mean? Rubbish.
Keith Prince AM: ‑‑ that you only meant TfL fares and not Travelcard fares. Thank you.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): It is really important ‑‑
Keith Prince AM: In that case, then, can I move on to my ‑‑
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am not sure if that was a question, a statement or a ‑‑
Keith Prince AM: Why? I have asked you a yes or no question. You cannot seem to answer it. I am afraid, Mr Mayor, that it is good that you want to be a Mayor for all London and I welcome that, but you are also going to get a reputation for being a Mayor who will not answer questions as well.
We have established that you did not fully brief London Assembly candidates or you omitted to brief your London Assembly colleagues. Therefore, can I ask, Mr Mayor, if you believe that Leonie Cooper [AM] owes the people of London an apology? Jennette Arnold OBE AM (Deputy Chair): Point of order, Chairman.
Keith Prince AM: If I can just refer to a Twitter exchange on 24 April 2016, it was a question by somebody called Andrew, @mehbo:
“Will @SadiqKhan pledge to freeze fares include my annual travel card for zones 1‑3? Thanks.”
A quote from Leonie Cooper:
“Quote from Sadiq’s Manifesto [clearly inaccurately quoted]: ‘Freeze fares for the next 4 years’. Does not exclude pay as you go, season tickets, anything. OK?”
Mr Mayor, either you owe Leonie Cooper an apology for not having made the situation clear or she does definitely owe her constituents an apology for having either deliberately or erroneously misled them. Which is it?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Sorry, Chairman, I lost track of the question. Could he ask that again, please?
Keith Prince AM: Yes, I can. The question is very simple. Your Assembly colleague, Leonie Cooper, was in a Twitter exchange where she was asked whether the pledge included the person’s annual Travelcard for zones 1 to 3. She tweeted:
“Quote from Sadiq’s Manifesto [clearly an erroneous tweet because your manifesto does clearly state ‘TfL fares’]: ‘Freeze fares for the next 4 years’. Does not exclude pay as you go, season tickets, anything. OK?”
The question, Mr Mayor, to you is simply: do you owe Leonie Cooper an apology for not having made your position clear, although your manifesto does? Most definitely, Ms Cooper owe her residents an apology for having misled them because either she misled them erroneously, which we all can do because a lot of people seem to have assumed that you meant to include Travelcards, or she was not properly informed by you and, unfortunately, misled the public. I would like to ask you: do you feel that you owe her an apology for not having briefed her fully or do you feel you owe the people of London an apology for not having been clear? In any case, clearly, Assembly Member Cooper owes her constituents an apology for misleading them.
Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Yes, we have the question now.
Leonie Cooper AM: Is it possible to ask Assembly Member Prince to refer to me as “Assembly Member Cooper”, please?
Tony Arbour AM: Yes, I do agree. He did apologise for failing to do so.
Keith Prince AM: I do apologise. I do apologise for that. I am always very quick to apologise when I make a mistake.
Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Mr Mayor, you may have the gist of the question now. Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I think so. Can I just say?
Leonie Cooper AM: Can I have a point of personal explanation please?
Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Yes, later.
Keith Prince AM: Yes, you have a right to a personal explanation, yes.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Can I say, Chairman, what I find so surprising? There are seven months until January when the fares go up. What I find surprising is how Assembly Member Prince has so little confidence in this Government managing to make the private companies freeze their fares like I have done. I know he does not have confidence in the DfT; I know he does not have confidence in his Ministers; I know he does not have confidence in them holding private companies to account being inside the committees. However, I am confident that if they can get a similar deal to what I have, we can freeze the fares for those as well.
Keith Prince AM: Mr Chairman, he is not answering the question. The Mayor has failed once again to answer a question. Would you like me to repeat the question again, Mr Mayor?
Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): No.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I think the gallery would leave if you did, but you can try.
Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Assembly Member Prince, do you think you can ask the question more penetratingly?
Keith Prince AM: No. I can accept and I think everybody here today can witness the fact that the Mayor has failed on two occasions in this session to answer any question. It is a great shame, Mr Mayor, that you cannot accept that there may be, accidentally or erroneously, a misleading and that you cannot be big enough to just offer an apology. It is a great shame that you do not feel yourself able to actually answer a yes or no question. That is a great shame and that is going to set a very bad precedent for the rest of your term for someone who wants to be a Mayor for London.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Sorry, Chairman ‑‑
Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Yes, you have made your point.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Was that a question or a point of personal explanation?
Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): It was difficult to tell, Mr Mayor.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Yes, for me, too.
Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): It was difficult to tell. Assembly Member Cooper, you can give a point of personal explanation only if you believe you have been misrepresented. Otherwise, you can ask the Mayor if he thinks you have been misrepresented. You may wish to do it that way.
Leonie Cooper AM: My point of personal explanation is to commiserate with the people of Havering and Redbridge whose Assembly Member appears to spend more time reading my Twitter feed than representing his constituents.
Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): He is the only person who does, I expect.
Leonie Cooper AM: If he has been examining my Twitter feed in such detail, he will find that his question is answered in subsequent tweets and I would just like to refer him to the subsequent tweets as well as the one that he was referring to. Thank you, Mr Chairman.
Financial Benefit (1) Question No: 2016/2286 Keith Prince Will TfL receive any financial benefit from next year's increase in the cost of Travelcards and the Oyster PAYG daily and weekly caps?
The Mayor
The previous Mayor's Business Plan assumed that all fares revenue would increase by RPI+1 per cent each year. That meant it assumed that Londoners would have paid 17 per cent more for their tickets by 2020.
If Travelcards and daily and weekly caps increase by RPI in future years, this will represent a reduction in revenue against the Business Plan assumption of RPI+1 per cent. The revenue TfL expects to receive from RPI-only increases in Travelcards under the Travelcard Agreement has been included in estimates for a TfL fares freeze (please see my answer to MQ2016/2270).
These can, however, only ever be estimates. The actual values will be determined by the actual path of a range of variables including inflation and ridership.
Financial Benefit (2) Question No: 2016/2287 Keith Prince If so, how much additional revenue does TfL expect to receive due to the increase in the cost of Travelcards and the daily and weekly PAYG caps?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
Please see my answer to MQ 2016/2286. Ilford Lane Gridlock Question No: 2016/2288 Keith Prince Every time a bus stops in Ilford Lane, the traffic backs up to the Winston Way Roundabout and causes gridlock in the centre of Ilford. Will the Mayor instruct TfL to meet with me to see this problem for themselves and reach a solution to remove this misery from my constituents?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
Data from the Department for Transport reports an average daily flow of 13,500 motor vehicles using Ilford Lane. Bus services, including east London transit routes, account for only four per cent of these vehicles but roughly half of all passenger trips along this corridor. High utilisation of bus services in this area and the popularity of this bus stop suggests stopping at this location is necessary.
TfL would be happy to meet with you to discuss stopping arrangements on Ilford Lane.
One Hour Bus Ticket Cost Disparities (1) Question No: 2016/2289 Keith Prince In March the Assembly was told that the introduction of a one-hour bus ticket would cost £50 million per year. After the announcement of the "Hopper" ticket, we were told it cost £30 million per year. Please can you explain the disparity?
The Mayor
There is no disparity. TfL has previously estimated that a one-hour bus ticket would cost up to £50m per year. Please see the answer to MQ 2015/3289.
Based on current observed travel behaviour, TfL estimates that my Hopper ticket will reduce fares revenue by £43m per year but will also encourage additional travel, so the net reduction is currently estimated to be approximately £30m per year. The actual value will be determined by actual ridership and behaviour. One Hour Bus Ticket Cost Disparities (2) Question No: 2016/2290 Keith Prince We were also told that the £30 million per year cost of the "Hopper" ticket will "be met through more efficient working within TfL." Please provide details of exactly which working methods will be changed and how this will save £30 million per year?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
I have instructed the TfL Commissioner to undertake a root and branch review of the organisation, which will ensure that the Hopper ticket and my fares freeze are funded in full.
The details of this review will be published as part of my new Transport Plan for London later in the year.
Opposing Heathrow Expansion Question No: 2016/2291 Keith Prince Please update the Assembly on what the Mayor has done since his election to make the expansion of Heathrow less likely?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 08/08/2016
London is in need of new aviation capacity but it is absolutely clear that this cannot be delivered at Heathrow on environmental grounds.
A second runway at Gatwick is a more viable, cheaper and easier to build alternative and the sooner the Government recognises this and takes the decision to proceed on that basis the better. This is the point I made on my visit to Gatwick on 15 July.
Whatever decision the Government takes I will ensure that Londoner's interests will be fully represented.
Gospel Oak station passenger numbers (2) London City Airport (1) Question No: 2016/2292 Keith Prince The Secretaries of State are expected to make a decision later this year on the expansion of London City Airport following the Public Inquiry in the spring. Does the Mayor support the plans the airport has to expand?
The Mayor
I support the case for improved noise mitigation measures that was made at the Planning Inquiry should the Secretaries of State decide to grant planning permission for the Airport's expansion.
London City Airport (2) Question No: 2016/2293 Keith Prince In February this year London City Airport was given permission by the Civil Aviation Authority to concentrate its flight paths. The decision was taken in the face on considerable opposition from local authorities and local residents. The CAA is obliged to review that decision by February 2017. Will the Mayor join me in urging the CAA to conduct an in-depth review which carefully assesses the impact of the concentrated flight paths on local communities?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
I would welcome a review by the CAA of the decision and its impacts. I also understand that the CAA is proposing changes to its airspace change process which, going forward, will make it more transparent and better able to engage with local communities.
Transportation of impounded vehicles Question No: 2016/2294 Kemi Badenoch What steps do MOPAC and the Metropolitan Police Service take to ensure that vehicles which are impounded are not misused while being transported?
The Mayor
Policies are in place to ensure the care of vehicles and property that have been impounded and under the care of the MPS.
Any deviations from the policy by Officers are dealt with by internal processes. The policy can be found at the link below. http://www.met.police.uk/foi/pdfs/policies/vres_policy.pdf Misuse of impounded vehicles Question No: 2016/2295 Kemi Badenoch How many incidents have there been of vehicles impounded by the Metropolitan Police Service being misused during the period they have been impounded in each of the last three years?
The Mayor
When the Police impound vehicles there is guidance and supervision in place to prevent ensure the vehicle is properly dealt with. During the last three years, the MPS have impounded 11948 vehicles.
Over these three years there has been one reported incident of a vehicle being misused after being impounded, which was reported in 2016. This related to the vehicle being driven at speeds exceeding the maximum speed limits on route to the car pound.
Authorised Professional Practice on police-media relations (1) Question No: 2016/2296 Kemi Badenoch What involvement has MOPAC and the Metropolitan Police Service had with the newly proposed Authorised Professional Practice from the College of Policing on engaging with the media?
The Mayor
The MPS is working with the College of Police and National Police Chiefs Council so that their policies are aligned with the newly proposed practice.
The MPS are undertaking training and development to ensure that all officers are aware of this. They hold all of their policies on the MPS intranet for officers to access, and provide regular training and updates for staff.
Authorised Professional Practice on police-media relations (2) Question No: 2016/2297 Kemi Badenoch How do you, MOPAC and the Metropolitan Police Service propose to ensure all police officers are aware of, and effectively use, any new Authorised Professional Practice on police-media relations?
The Mayor
Please see my response to MQ 2016/ 2296. Twitter alerts (1) Question No: 2016/2298 Kemi Badenoch Which organisations within the GLA Group have been given authorisation by Twitter to use the Twitter Alerts service?
The Mayor
@MayorofLondon is the only account within the GLA Group that has been given authorisation to use the Twitter Alerts service.
Though not part of the GLA group, note that blue light services such as the Metropolitan Police (@metpoliceuk), the London Fire Brigade (@LondonFire) and London Ambulance Service (@Ldn_Ambulance) also have authorisation to use this service.
Twitter alerts (2) Question No: 2016/2299 Kemi Badenoch How many followers of GLA Group Twitter accounts have opted-in to receiving Twitter Alerts from these accounts?
The Mayor
At present, 7,140 people have signed up to receive alerts from @MayorofLondon.
Twitter Alerts (3) Question No: 2016/2300 Kemi Badenoch What guidance is provided to the GLA Group on the use of Twitter Alerts?
The Mayor
The use of Twitter Alerts is reserved for major incidents in London only. Any decision to implement Twitter Alerts on @MayorofLondon would be made by the wider crisis communications board working with the Metropolitan Police and any other involved parties.
In the event that Twitter Alerts were activated, all other channels run by the GLA group would retweet posts issued from the Twitter accounts of the Mayor, Metropolitan Police and other blue light services. Violence at Euro 2016 Question No: 2016/2301 Kemi Badenoch What work has MOPAC and the Metropolitan Police Service undertaken to assist French authorities during the Euro 2016 tournament?
The Mayor
The level of violence seen in France associated with the Euro 2016 Football is totally unacceptable. I am sure this view is shared by all, including all true football fans. The MPS has my support for all they can do to reduce the threat of violence to these Championships and to bring the offenders to justice.
In line with all occasions when the England team play abroad, the police put in place a plan to manage the possibility of disorder occurring.
Plans are coordinated through the national UK Football Policing Unit (UKFPU). They include ensuring all those who have been subject to travel restrictions surrender their passports; maintaining surveillance at airports and ports to prevent those subject to banning orders travelling abroad. In addition, the MPS through the UKFPU supply host countries with intelligence concerning known trouble makers. Some police officers will work alongside host police forces to support with intelligence gathering and identification of individuals.
This year the MPS have supplied officers and a Senior Investigating Officer to the National Euro investigative team. A public order crime specialist detective is now going to France to assist following the violence in Marseille.
Travel to Euro 2016 Question No: 2016/2302 Kemi Badenoch What work has the Metropolitan Police Service undertaken to ensure known football hooligans do not travel to the Euro 2016 tournament?
The Mayor
Please see the answer to MQ 2016/2301. Northern Ireland-related terrorism Question No: 2016/2303 Kemi Badenoch What steps are you, MOPAC and the Metropolitan Police Service taking to protect Londoners from the reported increased threat of Northern Ireland-related terrorism?
The Mayor
The MPS, Police Service of Northern Ireland & Security Service have long history of collaboration in tackling the threat posed by this form of terrorism. I have been fully briefed by the Police concerning the nature and the breadth of the threat from terrorism that London faces, whether this relates to Daesh (ISIS), Northern Ireland or the far right.
I have already initiated the London Preparedness Review, led by Lord Toby Harris, this is intended to provide assurance on London's ability to deal with and recover from a terrorist attack, from whatever source.
Police Officer secondary employment (1) Question No: 2016/2304 Kemi Badenoch How many Metropolitan Police Service officers currently have secondary forms of employment?
The Mayor
Secondary forms of employment are registered as business interests.
There are 4098 police officers that currently have business interests. Of these, over half (2190) relate to letting a property. Police Officer secondary employment (2) Question No: 2016/2305 Kemi Badenoch How many Metropolitan Police Service officers were refused requests to undertake secondary employment, and what roles were refused, in each of the last three years?
The Mayor
In the last 3 years, 48 police officers' business interest applications have been rejected. The nature of the rejected business interest is listed below:
Nature of Secondary Number Nature of Secondary Number employment rejected employment rejected Training 12 Animal care 1 Security 6 Photography 1 Medical 1 Building 1 Childcare 1 Writing 1 Selling 5 Sport 3 Driving/chauffeuring 4 Entertaining 1 Catering 1 Distribution 2 Property Mechanic 1 3 management/letting Computing 1 Gardening 1 Film extra 1 Beauty 1
Drunkenness in airports Question No: 2016/2306 Kemi Badenoch How many incidents of drunkenness in airports has the Metropolitan Police Service dealt with in each of the last three years?
The Mayor
Please see below the volume of arrests for drunkenness at airports within the Metropolitan Police Service area, or their immediate surroundings. This could also include drink/drive related matters.
2013 2014 2015 Grand Total Number of Custody Records 74 59 48 181 This data excludes arrests relating to drunkenness (on planes or once checked in) and was obtained using the locations of City of London or Heathrow Airports and circumstances of arrest. Drunkenness on planes Question No: 2016/2307 Kemi Badenoch How many incidents of drunkenness on planes has the Metropolitan Police Service dealt with in each of the last three years?
The Mayor
For the specific related offences under the Air Navigation Order 2009, there were the following volumes of Custody Records that contained at least one relevant offence.
Grand Offence Title 2013 2014 2015 Total Act as a member of the crew of an aircraft while under the 3 3 influence of drink Drunk in an aircraft 36 56 23 115 Total 36 59 23 118 Additionally, there were the following volumes of Custody Records where the Circumstances of Arrest stated that they had been drunk on a plane in flight but were dealt with for other offences.
Additional Drunk on Plane 2013 2014 2015 Grand Total Volume of Custody Records 7 6 7 20 Finally, there was the following volume of Custody Records where the detainee had been taken off / off loaded from an aircraft for being drunk and dealt with for other offences.
Taken off of a plane 2013 2014 2015 Grand Total Volume of Custody Records 6 6 5 17
MDMA use in London Question No: 2016/2308 Kemi Badenoch What assessment have you, MOPAC and the Metropolitan Police Service made of the 2016 European Drug Report which suggests MDMA has returned as the "stimulant drug of choice" for young people, and that more needs to be done to tackle the growing online market for such substances?
The Mayor
I welcome the study published by the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). The report raises a number of issues and highlights the importance of true partnership and collaboration by all agencies working together to reduce the opportunity for organised criminals to bring misery to the world's greatest city.
A range of approaches are taken to tackling drug markets in London, from the police working with International Partners to reduce importation opportunities, to collaboration with Local Authorities and other partners to pursue those who supply drugs.
I am aware of the damage drugs can have on our communities; criminals seek to profit and lead lavish lifestyles from the importation and supply of drugs and we would encourage anyone with information about the illicit supply of drugs to contact the MPS
Quietway 7 Question No: 2016/2309 Kemi Badenoch Given significant opposition to the existing plans for Quietway 7, will you commit to a pause in proceedings until the route and issues raised by local residents have been considered, including a thorough examination of alternative schemes and routes?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
I am aware of the concerns raised by residents and some groups about the Quietway proposals in Dulwich. Before deciding how to proceed, the London Borough of Southwark, as the relevant authority, is considering feedback from the recent consultations which closed on the 20 March 2016 along with recommendations from the Dulwich Community Council meeting held on 22 June.
There has been 18 months of engagement and consultation which has revealed a diverse range of views, with no overall consensus. Dulwich sits in the middle of the longer Quietway route, and it is important to find a way to avoid cutting the route short and losing some of the value of the project. Quietways (1) Question No: 2016/2310 Kemi Badenoch Please explain how the Mayor will "prioritise Quietways" given his manifesto commitment to do so?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
Quietways are generally quieter, low-traffic routes, offering an attractive environment for those that want to cycle at a gentler pace, away from busier roads, helping to make cycling an attractive and inclusive option to more Londoners. Quietways are an important part of the wider London cycling network.
As outlined in my manifesto, I support the delivery of more Cycle Superhighways, safer junctions and Quietways in order to grow London's cycle network.
Delivery of Quietways Phase 1 is underway and contains seven routes. Of these, Quietway 1 is now complete, with a further six routes due to be completed by spring 2017.
Quietways (2) Question No: 2016/2311 Kemi Badenoch What changes will be made to Quietways and London's cycling in general as a result of this new prioritisation?
The Mayor
TfL and the delivery agent for Quietways (Sustrans) will continue to work closely with the London boroughs and managing authorities to develop and deliver Quietway routes across London. Now that Quietway 1 is complete, and others are in development and under construction, we can review progress to date and incorporate lessons learned to ensure successful delivery of future schemes and look to expand.
Terrorism Preparedness Question No: 2016/2312 (Oral) Kemi Badenoch How will your review of terrorism preparedness make London safer?
The Mayor
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you for your question. Nothing is more important to me than keeping Londoners safe. It is my first and most pressing concern as Mayor. As a new Mayor, I believe that the people of London expect me to seek assurance that we are as prepared as we can be for any attack on our great city.
That is why I have asked Lord Toby Harris, a former Chair of the Metropolitan Police Authority, to undertake a review into London’s preparedness. Part of this involves ensuring that every single agency and individual involved in protecting our city has the resources and expertise they need to respond in the event that London is attached and can be deployed in the right way. This will make the city a safer place.
I have regular meetings with the Commissioner [of Police of the Metropolis] and the national counterterrorism lead about these issues. I have already had a chance to see our emergency services in action at a counterterrorism training exercise. I was impressed with their professionalism and their passion to serve. Our emergency services do a fantastic job for our city, confronting danger, protecting us from harm and supporting people in times of need. I want them to know that, as Mayor, I will back and support them in the difficult work that they do.
Lord Harris’s work will help to ensure that every possible step is taken to mitigate any weakness and that London is as prepared as possible. A copy of the terms of reference for the review has been sent to all Assembly Members and I am aware that Lord Harris has also asked for your views and comments as part of his review. I very much hope that you can contribute.
Kemi Badenoch AM: Thank you very much for that answer, Mr Mayor. I received the note from the preparedness review and it answered a lot of the questions that I was going to ask.
However, it also raised a new question. What is the review that is being done now that has not been done before? All of those activities seem to be things that already take place on a regular basis.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I explained that in my answer. As a new Mayor, I need to be reassured and confident that we are ready for an attack on London.
Kemi Badenoch AM: Because those reviews already take place, you could just ask rather than having another review of the reviews.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): No, they do not, with respect. For example, in London, there is the City of London Police, there is the British Transport Police (BTP) and there is the MPS. We have TfL in relation to public transport, we have the Port of London Authority and we have the other agencies as well. We need to make sure that we are prepared for how to respond to an attack ‑‑
Kemi Badenoch AM: I do not dispute any of that ‑‑
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): The British Red Cross, St John Ambulance--
Kemi Badenoch AM: I do not dispute any of that. I am just saying that it is all stuff that already happens. We all have a lot of respect for Lord Harris - he was a Member of this Assembly previously - but it does feel like this is an exercise that is being planned to confirm assumptions or maybe blame the previous Mayor, which is fine. Yes, we all do it; it is part of politics. However, at the end of the day, Londoners will want to know what you are doing that is new and that is different, rather than just looking to blame things - like you did with your housing questions - on what your predecessor did.
I am also concerned that this is supposed to be an independent review and you have picked a Labour peer rather than lots of cross-benchers who would have been suitable to carry out the role. Was there any specific reason why?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am not sure, Chairman, which question you want me to answer.
Kemi Badenoch AM: You can answer all of them.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): OK. I saw for myself the impact of the atrocities in Paris and in Brussels. The first visitor to see me when I became Mayor was the Mayor of Paris, Anne Hidalgo, and one of the things that we discussed was what happened in Paris and any lessons for me here in London.
I am also aware - with the greatest respect to our security services, to our fantastic police service and to our emergency services - that we can never be too careful. I need to be reassured, as the Mayor of this great city, that we are safe. I need to be reassured that I have done everything I can to make sure we are safe. That includes our response to an attack in London. By the way, just like we need to evolve our responses, we have to recognise the reason we do so is because the terrorists are evolving what they do to try to damage our way of life. I do not apologise for undertaking this review. To question my sincerity based on making cheap points against Boris Johnson is offensive, bearing in mind that as a Londoner, there but for the grace of God, including my constituents, my family, other friends who are at the receiving end of an attack on London.
So far as Lord Toby Harris’s curriculum vitae (CV) is concerned, he has worked closely with both Governments in recent times, the Labour one and the Coalition one. When I met with the Home Secretary to discuss his appointment, she expressed no displeasure that Lord Toby Harris was going to be undertaking this review. He has all the security clearances that he needs. If the Assembly Member wants to be sent a copy of his CV, I am sure that can be arranged as well. To suggest somehow that me undertaking this review is partisan and is self-serving or to question the integrity or the qualifications of Lord Harris is wrong and I hope she will consider her comments.
Kemi Badenoch AM: I did not question the integrity of Lord Harris. In fact, I praised him. What I am trying to make sure is that the review does not end up being pointless or to repeat information that we already have. You have not reassured me and so I will not pursue this line of questioning any further, but you have not reassured me that you are doing anything new that has not done been before and that could not be done just by asking questions of the commissioners of the various services, but thank you.
Affordable business space Question No: 2016/2313 (Oral) 1 Supplementary Questions Shaun Bailey What specific new policies do you intend to introduce into the London Plan to promote affordable business space in new developments, over and above the policies that already exist?
The Mayor
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. This is a very important issue. My officers are working on the details at the moment. However, at this stage in reviewing the London Plan, it is too early to set out specific new policies. What I can say is that I will make sure that the policies in my new plan will be as robust as possible and they will then be subject to public consultation and examination in public, consideration by the Secretary of State and scrutiny by the London Assembly.
The process to produce my new plan has already begun. Ideas that officers are exploring to promote affordable business space include delivering new spaces for small businesses within new residential and mixed‑use developments; promoting schemes to provide linked new affordable housing and business space and making affordable work space a strategic priority when seeking planning gain through section 106 obligations. However, new development may not always be the best way to provide affordable business space. Better protection for existing provision may provide more affordable premises and so I have instructed officers to investigate how existing protection policies can be tightened up in appropriate locations. I am working with Government to see how national policy on liberalising permitted development rights for change from offices, warehousing and shops to housing can be tailored to London’s distinct circumstances and I am also investigating the best way to support boroughs in introducing article 4 directions which will lift these rights in appropriate areas and protect office space where necessary.
Shaun Bailey AM: Thank you for that rather comprehensive answer. Thank you very much. How far along in these negotiations are you with the Government? One of London’s big panics is employment and we talk a lot about new start‑ups but we need the space for that.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I am as passionate as you about this issue and the Government has been receptive. I do not want to give a running commentary on negotiations, but it understands that London has a unique set of issues. If we lose the precious business space we have by permitted development to turn into homes, yes, of course it could be said that we are meeting the housing needs of London, but once we have lost this business space, we have lost it. We want to give local authorities the ability to get exemptions and help them do so and the Government seems receptive.
Shaun Bailey AM: OK. One last thing: we would really appreciate a running commentary on negotiations because the worry is that London businesses need to plan and need to know what is coming down the pipeline. If you could give us as much information as possible, we would really appreciate that.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): I will try to do so, but can I explain why? I like to be open and transparent but the Government, in good faith, is negotiating with me and its civil servants are and it is done in good faith. I will report back as soon as I can, but it is important that we carry on that good working relationship we have started with the Government.
Shaun Bailey AM: Agreed. OK, thank you. Thank you, Mr Mayor. Alcohol Misuse (1) Question No: 2016/2314 Shaun Bailey Pursuant to question 2016/1735, who will you meet with from "Public Health England, the NHS, MPS and the London boroughs" to inform your plans to reduce alcohol misuse in London?
The Mayor
In June I will be meeting with the Regional Director for London for Public Health England, Dr Yvonne Doyle, to discuss alcohol misuse and other issues.
Alcohol Misuse (2) Question No: 2016/2315 Shaun Bailey Pursuant to question 2016/1735, when will you meet with partners from "Public Health England, the NHS, MPS and the London boroughs to inform your plans to reduce alcohol misuse in London?
The Mayor
Please see my response to MQ 2016/2314.
Tuberculosis in London (1) Question No: 2016/2316 Shaun Bailey Pursuant to question 2016/1737 where you stated that you will work with partners at the TB Control Board to reduce rates of TB in London, what measure will you use to judge whether this work has been successful?
The Mayor
I will shortly be meeting Dr Yvonne Doyle, the chair of the London TB Control Board, to discuss a range of public health issues including how best I can support the Board in its objectives and how success will be measured.
Tuberculosis in London (2) Question No: 2016/2317 Shaun Bailey What is the date of your first planned meeting with partners at the TB Control Board to inform your plans to reduce rates of TB in London?
The Mayor
Please see my response to MQ 2016/ 2316. Tuberculosis in London (3) Question No: 2016/2318 Shaun Bailey What are the dates of your subsequent planned meetings with partner's at the TB Control Board to inform your plans to reduce rates of TB in London?
The Mayor
Please see my response to MQ 2016 /2316.
Mayor of London Health Powers Question No: 2016/2319 Shaun Bailey Pursuant to question 2016/1738 where you stated that you would like the Mayor and the London Health Board to have "an enhanced oversight role of health and care on behalf of all Londoners", which specific areas of health and care would you like to have oversight on?
The Mayor
I want the London Health Board to have enhanced political oversight of three main areas: firstly the Better Health for London 10 ambitions for London's health and care that were identified by Lord Darzi's London Health Commission and the NHS Five Year Forward View. Secondly the Board will oversee health and care devolution in London. Thirdly I want the board to oversee work to address health inequalities across the city.
Mayor of London Health Impact Question No: 2016/2320 Shaun Bailey Pursuant to question 2016/1738 stated that you want to work with partners and take a range of views before deciding where you can make the biggest impact on health. Which specific partners will you work with?
The Mayor
I will work with a range of partners including Public Health England, NHS England, local authorities, London Councils, the community and voluntary sector, and the business sector. Mayor of London Health Decisions Question No: 2016/2321 Shaun Bailey Pursuant to question 2016/1738, when will you meet with partners before taking final decisions on where you can make the biggest impact on health?
The Mayor
I will meet with a range of health related partners who attend the next London Health Board meeting on 28 June. I will also consider health in other conversations across the broad range of stakeholders who I will meet in the next few months.
Mayor of London Ambassador's Programme Question No: 2016/2322 Shaun Bailey Pursuant to question 2016/1736, can you confirm whether the former Mayor of London's ambassadors programme is still operational?
The Mayor
This programme is under review.
Mayor of London Ambassador's Programme Confirmation Question No: 2016/2323 Shaun Bailey Pursuant to question 2016/1736, when can we expect confirmation about the former Mayor of London's ambassador's programme's future?
The Mayor
Please see my response to MQ 2016 /2322.
Local Government Association Question No: 2016/2324 Shaun Bailey Do you support the Local Government Association's call to give local communities more freedom to ban junk food advertising near schools as a means of reducing health inequalities surrounding child obesity?
The Mayor
Yes, I support local authorities being given the powers to ban junk food advertising near schools to help to reduce the inequalities in child obesity in London. Healthy Schools London (2) Question No: 2016/2325 Shaun Bailey What specific steps are you going to take to build on the former Mayor of London's successful Healthy Schools London programme?
The Mayor
My public health commitment to promote healthy, active lifestyles, tackle child obesity, mental health, active travel, air pollution and inequality will be continued through Healthy Schools London (HSL). Building on this, my Health Team is currently developing a pilot to test rolling out a Healthy Early Years (HEY) programme across London. HEY is a potential awards scheme that would support and recognise early years settings' achievements in child health, wellbeing and school readiness (under-fives). This would reach out to children, staff, parents and the wider community across 13,000 London settings.
Healthy Schools London (1) Question No: 2016/2326 Shaun Bailey What assessment have you made of the former Mayor of London's Healthy Schools London programme?
The Mayor
An independent evaluation of the Healthy Schools London programme is underway. It is being led by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) and the North Thames CLAHRC. Draft initial findings are very positive and suggest that the programme has provided an extremely successful engagement strategy in difficult times with Boroughs playing an important role acting as a conduit between the GLA, borough, and schools. The Healthy Schools London programme currently has three-quarters of all London schools signed up (1752 schools) and over half of these have achieved a Bronze, Silver or Gold Award. The full evaluation will be available this summer.
Obesity in London (1) Question No: 2016/2327 Shaun Bailey What specific steps are you going to take to tackle obesity in London?
The Mayor
As Mayor I am prepared to take the action needed to tackle obesity in London. The steps I will take will be part of my comprehensive public health strategy, which is to be developed. Obesity in London (2) Question No: 2016/2328 Shaun Bailey Which partners are you going to work with to inform your plans to tackle obesity in London?
The Mayor
As Mayor I am prepared to take the action needed to tackle obesity in London. There is no single solution to this problem and I recognise action is needed from all sections of Government, non-governmental organisations, businesses and individuals. I will plan and coordinate some of this work through the London Health Board, which includes representation from Public Health England and the NHS.
Suicides in London Question No: 2016/2329 Shaun Bailey You pledged in your manifesto to "coordinate efforts to reduce the number of people who take their own lives". What specific steps do you plan to take to reduce the number of suicides in London?
The Mayor
Earlier this year the national mental health taskforce published its findings and recommendations. The taskforce recommended that all local areas have multi-agency suicide prevention plans in place by 2017.
I will work with local areas and in partnership with other agencies to support suicide reduction across London. As well as targeted work with those communities that are at higher risk of suicide, approaches to suicide prevention requires wider interventions aimed at improving people's overall mental health and wellbeing. I am determined that London leads the way in supporting people in crisis, in improving London's capacity to detect the signs of mental ill health, in promoting good mental health, in building strong, connected and resilient communities, and in getting London talking about mental health. Smoking in London Question No: 2016/2330 Shaun Bailey Research from the British Heart Foundation shows that more than one in five adults in Barking and Dagenham, Hammersmith and Fulham, Islington and Tower Hamlets smoke regularly - twice the rate of Richmond. Given that more than 1,000 Londoners are admitted to hospital each week for diseases directly caused by smoking, what steps are you, in conjunction with NHS partners, going to take to reduce the health inequalities associated with smoking in London?
The Mayor
I am committed to supporting the work of the British Heart Foundation, Public Health England, the NHS and local boroughs in reducing the harms of smoking which disproportionately affect our less well off communities. As part of the new London Health inequalities strategy I shall be looking to see what more can be done to help smoking prevention, to help those seeking to quit and to tackle the issue of illegal tobacco.
Cocaine Capital of Europe Question No: 2016/2331 Shaun Bailey An official study of drug concentrations in sewage has revealed that London is the cocaine capital of Europe for the second year running. What steps do you propose to take to highlight the risks associated with illegal substances?
The Mayor
I am aware of this report from the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Cocaine is a significant problem in London and I will be considering how we support the work of Public Health England, the Mayors Office for Policing and Crime, London boroughs, the Metropolitan Police Service and the voluntary sector to highlight the harms it causes. Clean Air Pilot Scheme Question No: 2016/2332 Shaun Bailey A pilot scheme involving 'clean air squad's' comprised of residents, council air quality wardens and volunteers will encourage parked motorists to switch off their engines if waiting in the City of London. Do you support this scheme and if so, do you plan to encourage that it be rolled out across London?
The Mayor
I do support the project, because this type of intervention has been demonstrated to have a significant impact on idling.
We are funding this project through the Mayor's Air Quality Fund with £117,000 in funding, which will be matched by the boroughs. The City of London are leading on the project but nine other boroughs are participating, so the impact will be felt across London. The participating boroughs are: City of London Corporation, Camden, Islington, Tower Hamlets, Southwark, Lambeth, Kensington and Chelsea, Hammersmith and Fulham, Enfield, and Harrow.
Crystal Palace Park Question No: 2016/2333 Steve O'Connell Mr Mayor, will you offer support for the formation of a Crystal Palace & Upper Norwood Neighbourhood Plan, the aim of which is to secure Crystal Palace's rightful place on the map? Spanning five boroughs, the plan provides a perfect example of cross-borough provision, encouraging councils to work together for the benefit of residents. This is a significant bid issue for London which, to date, has been severely neglected and which residents recognise would serve the distinct needs of the area as a whole.
The Mayor
Should the residents of Crystal Palace and Upper Norwood decide to establish a Neighbourhood Forum I would support them. Cycling Question No: 2016/2334 Steve O'Connell How do you propose to build on the former mayor's cycling legacy?
The Mayor
I am going to make London's streets even better for cycling and walking.
My Deputy Mayor for Transport is currently leading discussions to establish the most appropriate means of delivering enhanced promotion of more active travel; progress is being made and I will keep the Assembly updated about this work.
On cycling, I have pledged to increase the proportion of TfL's spend on cycling, invest in new routes, improve neighbourhoods and town centres, review the Safer Junctions programme and deliver more cycle storage and parking.
Housing Zones Question No: 2016/2335 Steve O'Connell Are there plans to agree a housing zone for Croydon & Sutton?
The Mayor
The GLA has explored the potential for Housing Zones in both Croydon and Sutton. Sutton was designated as a Housing Zone in November 2015 (MD1545). We have explored the potential for a Housing Zone with the London Borough of Croydon and are continuing these discussions alongside exploring other potential routes to increase housing delivery in this area.
Safer Neighbourhood Boards Question No: 2016/2336 (Oral) Steve O'Connell What does the future hold for Safer Neighbourhood Boards?
The Mayor
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Assembly Member. I want to ensure that real neighbour policing is delivered for the people of London. A key part of that is how people can engage with their local police. I am supportive of mechanisms that enable us to speak to and hear the voice of London and the more ways in which we can do this, the better. As part of my Police and Crime Plan, I will be considering how local engagement and accountability takes place and these deliberations will be reflected in subsequent work with the Commissioner on making these happen. The plan will be developed following an extensive consultation, where people will have the opportunity to make their views known.
My Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime has great experience of working with communities and first-hand knowledge of the importance of neighbourhood policing. I will be working with her to see what further mechanisms could be put in place to get even wider public representation and local accountability. I would like to commend the borough partners who are active in their boards and welcome the innovative crime prevention projects that are taking place across London. It will be important to ensure their experiences and views are fed into our consultation on how this works in the future. I have pledged to strengthen community and police relations and welcome all public involvement with the police. Being responsive to the needs of the community is at the heart of real neighbourhood policing. I am committed to re- establishing this for London.
Steve O’Connell AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor. No doubt you share with me a passion for engagement and confidence in the police for London. The previous Mayor, to his credit, identified quite early on that there is a need to improve the mechanisms, hence the introduction of the Safer Neighbourhood Boards, which were not without difficulty, but we now have Safer Neighbourhood Boards in every borough. Not all of them are the final item, but they are an improvement on what was before.
Now, I hear what you are saying about your review to introduce real neighbourhood policing and we will be looking at that very closely. However, do you support in principle - or does your Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime support in principle - the structure of the Safer Neighbourhood Boards as they are at the moment or are they up for grabs as part of your review?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): It is a bit of a postcode lottery. You are right that they have had teething problems. Some are doing good work; some are less good. The Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime is looking at it all in relation to how we police by consent better. If the Assembly Member has strong views, he should meet with the Deputy Mayor, Sophie Linden, and I am sure she will be receptive to any views he has in relation to this.
Steve O’Connell AM: What we must remember, Mr Mayor - and I have the scars on my back - is that you are dealing with people who have given up their own time voluntarily.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Absolutely.
Steve O’Connell AM: It is important to consider that over the last four to six years many of those people have undertaken changes in the way that they engage with police and most of them across London have welcomed that; not without some difficulty. I would urge caution because we have many of the boards in a good place and I know a colleague to my right is straining to say how good the one is in Lewisham, for example, because it is, but there are others that are not quite where they are.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Can I say? You make a very fair point and I hear you.
Steve O’Connell AM: Going on to the ward panels: have you any thoughts around the continuation or the strength of ward panels at all?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): This is all part of the work we are undertaking in relation to the Police and Crime Plan.
Steve O’Connell AM: OK. My last point on that, Chairman, is that we have all had an aspiration for functional ward panels across 630 wards. I said to the previous Mayor that that will take two mayoralties, not one. It is still an aspiration and I will be urging you to complete that task. Thank you very much.
United Nations Environmental Programme Question No: 2016/2337 Steve O'Connell What assessment have you, MOPAC and the Metropolitan Police Service made of the joint Interpol and United Nations Environment Programme study which suggested natural resources worth between $91 billion and $258 billion are being stolen annually?
The Mayor
MOPAC and the MPS have not made a full assessment of the study. The element of the report that deals with Wildlife Crime is answered in question 2338.
Theft of natural resources Question No: 2016/2338 Steve O'Connell What steps are MOPAC and the Metropolitan Police Service taking to reduce the theft of natural resources following suggestions in a United Nations report that the value of environmental crime has increased by 26 per cent on estimates from two years ago?
The Mayor
With reference to MQ 2337, the reduction of Environmental Crime, as referenced in the report under the sub-category of illegal trade plants/wildlife, centres on the Met's Wildlife Crime Unit's work in London.
I have committed to providing the resources it needs to be effective, and will ensure that my budget includes provisions for the unit to continue its important work. I am proud that London hosts the only police service with a dedicated Wildlife Crime Unit and I will support their work as Mayor. Missing people investigations Question No: 2016/2339 Steve O'Connell What assessments have you, MOPAC and the Metropolitan Police Service of the report by the All Party Parliamentary Group for Runaway and Missing Children and Adults that at least 10,000 children a year across the UK, many of them in London, could be at risk because they receive no response when they go missing?
The Mayor
In 2013, ACPO (now National Police Chiefs Council) widened the definition of a missing person to include an 'absent' category which distinguishes between people who are 'absent' and 'missing'.
The new definition aimed to ensure Police resources were used to best effect when Missing Person reports were received, leading to a more effective and efficient response by Police and other agencies.
A new approach to investigating missing people was launched on Monday 14 July 2014, across the MPS. This takes wider vulnerabilities into consideration when dealing with a missing child and enables the Met to capture a greater number of vulnerable young people through a safeguarding approach. Once recognised referrals are then placed within local mechanisms such as Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hubs (MASH) or Multi Agency Sexual Exploitation (MASE) meetings in order to alert agencies to a young person's high level of vulnerability.
MOPAC have been keen to address this issue through their gangs and CSE work in particular and are reviewing effective practice around both the MASE process and Return Home Interviews as part of the London Safeguarding Children's Board CSE task and Finish group.
Reporting of crime using British Sign Language (1) Question No: 2016/2340 Steve O'Connell What provisions do MOPAC and the Metropolitan Police Service have in place to enable the reporting of crimes using British Sign Language?
The Mayor
Customers who may be deaf or have a speech impairment can contact the MPS using a text phone on 18001 101 or 18000 in emergencies.
Alternatively they can register for EmergencySMS text service. EmergencySMS service lets people in the UK send an SMS text to UK 999 service where it will be passed to the police, ambulance, fire rescue or coastguard.
When contact is made with the MPS call centre, the operator will contact the Met's Interpreter Deployment's Team (IDT). The IDT will arrange a scheduled appointment for the member of the public to report the crime with a police officer and a BSL interpreter. Reporting of crime using British Sign Language (2) Question No: 2016/2341 Steve O'Connell What assessment have you, MOPAC and the Metropolitan Police Service made of the new service recently introduced by Greater Manchester Police that enables people to use British Sign Language to report crime online?
The Mayor
The Greater Manchester Police service is still very new and I look forward to an evaluation and the learning that can be taken from it. The MPS is keen to facilitate easy reporting for people wanting to use British Sign Language.
Safeguards for response drivers Question No: 2016/2342 Steve O'Connell What assessment have you, MOPAC and the Metropolitan Police Service made of the suggestion that police officers acting as response drivers should be given the same protection in law as those conducting police pursuits?
The Mayor
At this time, no legal protection exists for pursuit (advanced) or response drivers. Police driving is held to the same legal standards as all UK drivers i.e. was the driving 'Careless' or 'Dangerous'.
Until Parliament clarifies the proposals and passes legislation the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) cannot assess the impact to the public or police.
The MPS refers cases involving its police drivers to the National Pursuits Steering group if there are any concerns an offence may have been committed. This group has in the past provided the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) with advice on whether a police driver should be prosecuted or not. Police response drivers Question No: 2016/2343 Steve O'Connell How many road traffic collisions involving Metropolitan Police Service response drivers have been recorded in each of the last three years?
The Mayor
Full year figures are available for the last three financial years, which run from 1st April to 31st March inclusive. All figures are collated from the Police Driving Standards Unit Database
These figures relate to response qualified drivers
2013 - 2014 1,492
2014 - 2015 1,649
2015 - 2016 1,748
Police pursuit drivers Question No: 2016/2344 Steve O'Connell How many road traffic collisions involving Metropolitan Police Service officers involved in a pursuit have been recorded in each of the last three years?
The Mayor
Full year figures are available for the last three financial years, which run from 1st April to 31st March inclusive. All figures are collated from the Police Driving Standards Unit Database.
2013 - 2014 474
2014 - 2015 434
2015 - 2016 498 Vulnerability data sharing Question No: 2016/2345 Steve O'Connell What assessment have you made of the Metropolitan Police Service's ability to share data on vulnerable people with partner agencies such as the National Health Service?
The Mayor
Currently, the MPS principally shares vulnerability data on a quarterly basis through the London Safeguarding Children's Board, which is led by London Councils. The report provides a strategic picture of the police encountered vulnerability and the format is currently being refined to allow better problem solving.
On a tactical basis, information on vulnerable people is shared through the borough-based Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hubs (MASH). Co-located staff are able to share police information fast time to assess, and where necessary take action to safeguard individuals coming to notice.
I will be developing my Police and Crime Plan and that will present an excellent opportunity to consult with key stakeholders on current and future practice.
Cane Hill Development Question No: 2016/2346 Steve O'Connell In light of TfL having confirmed that traffic levels in outer London have risen over the last two years and are forecast to continue rising, will you support the provision of an additional access road from the Cane Hill Development (sited on GLA land) to the A23? The current status quo (of only one ingress and one exit serving the estate via the town centre) is inadequate and will only exacerbate the existing severe traffic problems in Coulsdon Town Centre and the surrounding roads.
The Mayor
TfL reviewed the planning application and transport assessment for the Cane Hill site in 2014. It concluded that a new junction on the A23 was not necessary or appropriate, and that a new access in such close proximity to the existing access would undermine the operation of the existing network. The proposal to provide a new access across Farthing Down would also require development on Green Belt land and this is not something I could support.
TfL has identified increases in traffic in outer London. However, this in itself does not warrant the need for a new access road at this location, which could attract more cars and slow operation of the network between existing junctions. AFC Wimbledon planning application Question No: 2016/2347 Steve O'Connell What progress is being made in determining this application, and would you consider restoring authority for this application to Merton Council?
The Mayor
As you will be aware the application has been called-in meaning that I am the Local Planning Authority for this application. As such it is not appropriate for me to discuss the merits of the application as this may prejudice my decision.
A representation hearing date is yet to be set but as per the Representation Hearings Procedure, the date will be made public on the following web page: https://www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/planning/planning-applications-and- decisions/public-hearings/wimbledon-greyhound-stadium.
Disability Hate Crime Question No: 2016/2348 Steve O'Connell From January to April this year, the Metropolitan Police Service recorded 229 cases of disability hate crime. This amounts to more hate crimes against disabled people in four months than the entirety of 2014. What steps are you going to take to tackle disability hate crime in London?
The Mayor
I am concerned about any increases in hate crime. We know however, that hate crime has historically been under-reported and that is especially true of disability hate crime.
In February the MPS and community partners launched the 'Disability Hate Crime Matters' initiative, providing briefings to frontline officers to ensure disability hate crime is recognised, properly recorded, and gets the response it requires. This has seen a far higher number of disability hate crime reports captured than would previously been the case.
Call centre staff, front-line officers and Community Safety Unit detectives now have the training to respond to reports of disability hate crime, including gathering evidence to support potential enhanced sentences for perpetrators, and ensuring victims are aware of where they can receive appropriate support.
I have pledged to direct the MPS to take a zero-tolerance approach to hate crime, including disability hate crime. I want to build on successful community-led initiatives such as this and the development of my Police and Crime Plan will present an opportunity to hear more from communities and partner agencies about how we can work together to effectively tackle hate crime. Purley Skyscraper Question No: 2016/2349 Steve O'Connell Given the significant local concerns about a proposed 16-storey building in Purley, do you think the proposed development is acceptable?
The Mayor
A planning application for this proposal, known as Mosaic Place, was referred to the Mayor by Croydon Council on 16 June 2016. The Mayor will issue his Stage 1 decision to the Council within 6 weeks, so it would not be proper to comment further at this stage.
LIPs Funding (1) Question No: 2016/2350 Steve O'Connell When the previous Mayor sought to make savings within TfL, it was often suggested by TfL officers that LIPs funding should be cut. Can you reassure Londoners and London's boroughs that you will ignore that advice and make no attempt to cut back the total amount of LIPs funding given to boroughs?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
A comprehensive Transport Strategy for London can only be delivered in partnership with the boroughs, including funding via the Local Implementation Plans (LIPs) process, and other programmes. LIPs funding has never been singled out for cuts. TfL's funding to the London boroughs in recent years has gone significantly beyond that tied directly to the projects and programmes in their LIPs and includes funding for: major cycling improvements; bus priority measures; local air quality improvements; and Crossrail complementary measures.
Therefore, it is right that we look at funding to the boroughs in the next round, including that required to support delivery of their LIPs, to make sure the funding supports both local and London-wide transport priorities. TfL will be engaging with boroughs this year on how TfL and the boroughs can work together to deliver for London and all its neighbourhoods. My Deputy Mayor for Transport will be meeting with the London Councils TEC executive shortly to discuss LIPs and establish the engagement process. LIPs Funding (2) Question No: 2016/2351 Steve O'Connell If the Mayor is unable to guarantee to protect LIPs funding now, how soon will a decision be made on whether or not LIPs funding will be protected?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
Work has begun to look at TfL's New Transport Plan for London for the coming years, including funding via boroughs, in parallel with the engagement with boroughs about future working arrangements.
We hope to be able to confirm borough funding for 2017/18 before the end of the year.
LIPs Funding (3) Question No: 2016/2352 Steve O'Connell Will the Mayor guarantee that he will not seek to make the way in which LIPs funding is spent any more prescriptive than it is currently?
The Mayor
There is already a working group between TfL and borough officers, chaired by London Councils, discussing future joint working. This considers how that work, and the TfL funding that supports it, can best deliver the strategic priorities for London - for example in enabling and benefiting from growth in housing and jobs - and local priorities. This is likely to involve a continuation of the mixed approach of both open and more targeted funding available to boroughs.
Oyster Cards on Cycle Hire Scheme Question No: 2016/2353 Tony Arbour Will the Mayor update the Assembly on TfL's progress in enabling the usage of Oyster Cards and contactless payment with the Cycle Hire Scheme?
The Mayor
I intend to integrate cycle hire more fully into TfL's payment systems.
Options TfL are examining include offering customers a single on-line account for cycle hire and public transport, and bringing cycle hire into Oyster and contactless payment capping. Planning and Environment Leadership Question No: 2016/2354 (Oral) Tony Devenish When do you intend to appoint Deputy Mayors for Planning and the Environment? What are your governance arrangements in the meantime?
The Mayor
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Chairman. I have been quite clear that I do not want to repeat the mistakes of my predecessor in rushing to make appointments to my top team. The best piece of advice I have received from the previous occupant of this chair was to take my time and appoint the right person for the job. I have taken my time to determine the key responsibilities for each role and I will be appointing my planning and environment leads shortly. My Mayoral Director of Policy and Chief of Staff are currently overseeing the work of the environment and planning teams until these new appointments are made.
However, I am a Mayor who rolls up my sleeves and gets on with the job of making London a better place to live, work and visit. I will not be a Mayor who waits for others to get on with the tasks that need doing. This is why I have taken action in these areas. I have already joined the ClientEarth legal action on air quality; announced there will be an air quality consultation launched before the summer, including plans for a T-charge; announced that there will be more air quality information provided to Londoners; and shared regular planning decision meetings where there have been 21 planning referrals - 11 at stage 1 and 10 at stage 2 - as well as one Opportunity Area Framework and one local plan agreed. As you will be aware, I have already appointed my Deputy Mayors for Housing, Transport and Policing and Crime and my statutory Deputy Mayor is in this very Chamber, as is the new Chair of LFEPA.
Tony Devenish AM: Thank you, Mr Mayor. Can I start by thanking the Deputy Mayor, Mr Murray, for engaging so openly on housing. It does contrast with some of the blame culture you have again this morning articulated. Blaming Boris [Boris Johnson, former Mayor of London] for nearly every question is not acceptable and your gold‑brick rhetoric does not help Londoners get homes.
My question is about how what would help is updating the London Plan with clarity quickly. We have talked about a two-year programme, or the Deputy Mayor has. Can you in any way, as you have said many times in other things, fast-track that process? What really counts is building more homes and getting on with it quickly.
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Chairman, I am sure Assembly Members are aware of the hoops we have to go through in relation to a new London Plan. It is right that we consult and draft it properly, but the Assembly Member is right that we need to telegraph our intentions and so I am hoping to publish Supplementary Planning Guidance in the near future that will set out the direction of travel and give the certainty that London needs.
Tony Devenish AM: Thank you. Can I push you on the date when you are likely to appoint the Deputy Mayor for Planning and Environment? Do you regret the loss of Neale Coleman’s [former Chair, LLDC] expertise that he would have brought to your team?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Neale was here for a short period to help me in the transition and I wish him well in looking for long-term projects. In relation to the appointments, we will make them shortly.
Tony Devenish AM: Finally, on the point of engagement, Deputy Mayor Murray has shown leadership in that area. I was delighted to read that you went to Rupert Murdoch’s summer party. Did you pick up any tips in terms of the environment or planning at the party?
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): No.
Tony Devenish AM: Thank you.
London Waste and Recycling Board Question No: 2016/2355 Tony Devenish What are your future plans for the London Waste and Recycling Board?
The Mayor
My plans are for the London Waste and Recycling Board to continue its excellent work investing in recycling facilities and circular economy businesses in London as well as supporting London boroughs improve their recycling rates.
Energy efficiency Question No: 2016/2356 Tony Devenish Do you intend to continue with the GLA's RE:FIT and RE:NEW energy efficiency programmes? How effective do you understand the programmes have been?
The Mayor
I intend to continue with homes and buildings retrofit programmes. But to achieve my ambitious target of becoming a zero carbon city by 2050 we will need to rapidly increase the pace of retrofitting, so I am currently exploring what more can be done. TfL Land Question No: 2016/2357 Tony Devenish What are the expected financial returns from your plans to develop housing on TfL land in 2016-17 and 2017-18?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 11/07/2016
The forecast for all income from property development activities is £33m for 2016/17 and £111m for 2017/18.
Housing delivery Question No: 2016/2358 Tony Devenish Further to question 2016/1778, what 'urgent measures' are you putting in place to address housing delivery on brownfield sites?
The Mayor
I am considering a wide range of measures that could help to increase delivery on brownfield sites and ensure developers actually build out sites once planning permission is granted.
This includes incentivising early delivery through the use of review mechanisms and, over the longer term, exploring whether planning permission timescales or conditions could be used to accelerate house building.
There are also significant opportunities to increase overall and affordable housing delivery on public sector owned brownfield sites in London, particularly on land owned by TfL, and I am working closely with TfL to expedite these sites. Green Belt Question No: 2016/2359 Tony Devenish Further to question 2016/1778, if you are presented with a new local development plan from any borough that proposes to de-designate areas of Green Belt or Metropolitan Open Land, will you use your power to oppose it?
The Mayor
I have already made clear my commitment to protecting the Green Belt and Metropolitan Open Land, in line with national policy, and will use my powers to that end to oppose de-designation.
As part of this process, I anticipate that I would make strong representations to the relevant borough on its proposals and if invited to attend the Examination in Public would make these very clear to the independent Inspector so that his/her recommendations were fully informed by relevant policy.
50% Affordable Housing Targets (1) Question No: 2016/2360 Tony Devenish Do you share the Deputy Mayor for Housing's desire for your 50% affordable housing targets to become embedded in land values?
The Mayor
When asked by the Housing Committee on June 7th about our long-term strategic affordable housing target of 50%, the Deputy Mayor for Housing said " if you have clearer planning rules upfront, them some of the affordable housing requirements get embedded in land values". I agree entirely
50% Affordable Housing Targets (2) Question No: 2016/2361 Tony Devenish Has any work been done to assess the impact that this would have on the value of TfL brownfield land?
The Mayor
TfL is engaging positively on this matter, and they are confident that they will be able to achieve a 50% affordable housing target across a portfolio of sites as well as achieving the necessary financial returns. Planning powers Question No: 2016/2362 Tony Devenish When do you expect to set guidelines for calling in new planning applications, especially under your new powers granted by the Housing and Planning Act, and what criteria will this include?
The Mayor
The Housing and Planning Act creates the legislative framework that would allow me to set criteria for referral of applications to me, such as for safeguarded wharves and strategic viewing corridors. However, it requires further secondary legislation from the Secretary of State to before it can be implemented. My officers are in discussions with CLG officials regarding the timescale of this.
Closure of fire stations in London Question No: 2016/2363 Caroline Pidgeon Following the closure of 10 fire stations in 2014 please state the current use of each the former station sites. If any of the fire stations remain empty please state the security and other costs that have been generated at each location since the closure of the stations.
The Mayor
Of the 10 stations that closed in January 2014, seven disposals have been completed. Of the remaining 3 stations the costs that have been incurred in respect of maintenance, security and utilities since closure up to the end of the financial year 2015/16 is as follows:
Clerkenwell £263,882
Westminster £208,085
Southwark £163,686 Well London/Well Communities Project Question No: 2016/2364 Len Duvall Please provide an update, particularly with reference to my constituency, on progress with the 'Well London' health inequality initiatives, which I believe have now been rebranded as 'Well Communities'.
The Mayor
A third phase of Well London is being developed by UEL as part of a wider Well Communities programme. The focus is on embedding and scaling up across a number of boroughs and piloting outside London. An additional focus will be on supporting integrated care initiatives at the neighbourhood level.
LB Lewisham and RB Greenwich have seen the positive impacts from Phases 1 & 2 and continue to support Well London in Bellingham and Woolwich Dockyard.
In phase 3 boroughs, Well Communities will be established in a number of neighbourhoods as a framework for local investment in building resilient and healthy communities.
EU Flag at City Hall Question No: 2016/2407 Peter Whittle Can the mayor confirm that in the event of a vote to leave the European Union on Thursday 23rd, the EU flag currently installed outside City Hall will be removed?
The Mayor
The people of Britain have voted to leave the EU and their democratic will must now be fulfilled.
Our city will continue to look outwards and trade and engage with the entire world - including the European Union - and we will continue to fly the EU flag outside City Hall.
I believe it also sends an important message to the almost one million Europeans living in London, who make a huge contribution to our city.
It will take time to negotiate an exit. For now, the UK and London are still part of the European Union. Brexit and Safety Question No: 2016/2408 Navin Shah Do you agree with the former Met Police Commissioners the Brexit will mean a ‘gamble with our security’?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28/06/2016
I believe that our country is better off within the European Union, but there is no doubt that London will continue to be the safe and successful city it is today. I will be pushing to make sure that the needs of London are represented in the negotiations to come.
Oral Update on the Mayor's Report Question No: 2016/2409 2 Supplementary Questions 1 Commitments Tony Arbour Tony Arbour AM (Chairman): Mr Mayor, will you now provide an oral update?
The Mayor
Sadiq Khan (Mayor of London): Thank you, Mr Chairman, for the words you said before the minute’s silence for Jo’s death. Following on from that minute’s silence, I will express my horror and sorrow at the death of my friend Jo Cox. I am sure that all of us pass on our thoughts and prayers to her family and friends.
I knew Jo from her time as a fearless campaigner working on behalf of some of the world’s poorest and most marginalised. She brought her passion for social justice and equality to Parliament and fought just as hard for her own community in Westminster as she had for so many around the world. In the one year she was the Member of Parliament (MP) for Batley and Spen, she made more of an impact than many other people make in a whole parliamentary career. The expressions of grief and the tributes paid to Jo over the last few days illustrate how cherished she was, not only by her constituents, friends and family, but also across the political divide.
Mr Chairman, on Friday, 10 June 2016, I was honoured to attend the Service of Thanksgiving at St Paul’s Cathedral in honour of her Majesty the Queen. The service marked the occasion of her Majesty’s official 90th birthday. I hosted a Patron’s Lunch in Trafalgar Square on Sunday, 12 June 2016. The free public event gave Londoners the opportunity to show her Majesty what they thought of her turning 90. It was a great day. Over 10,000 people came to the Square during the day.
On 13 June 2016, I joined 20,000 Londoners in Old Compton Street as we stood shoulder-to- shoulder with the people of Orlando and the victims of the Pulse nightclub attack. I was proud to stand with Londoners and remind the world that no one should be frightened away from being who they are.
Assembly Members will be aware, Mr Chairman, that upon my election I asked City Hall officers to throw open the books and conduct a complete audit of Boris Johnson’s [former Mayor of London] housing crisis in London. That audit has already revealed that across all of the planning permissions granted in London last year, only 13% of the homes were affordable. It also showed that the London Rental Standard, which was supposed to accredit 100,000 landlords, has signed up only 2,000 new landlords.
Today I can reveal the latest output of my audit, which is an analysis of Boris Johnson’s Concordat, established to tackle the problem of London properties being sold off-plan as gold bricks to foreign investors before being advertised here in London, a growing problem that means fewer homes are available for Londoners. The analysis has revealed that his Concordat has failed to address the problem. The Greater London Authority (GLA) had no process to monitor whether the signatories to the Concordat were keeping to their promises. There were no powers or processes to enforce the marketing activities of the signatories. If it was broken, as evidence suggests it has been, there was no effective sanction available to the Mayor. In short, it was a meaningless and toothless failure and a complete waste of time. I am determined to act to give more Londoners first dibs on more new and affordable housing and have asked officers to bring forward a range of options to replace Boris Johnson’s failed attempts. I am determined to do the hard work necessary to begin fixing London’s housing crisis.
I have been asked, Mr Chairman, for two oral updates from Assembly Members, which I will now turn to.
The first is from Assembly Member McCartney on the North Middlesex University Hospital. This is a very serious issue, which I know the Trust itself and its National Health Service (NHS) partners both locally and nationally are working hard to resolve. However, the fact is that London’s NHS is seriously struggling and this is even worse in northwest London. Closures to accident and emergency departments (A&Es) have had a dramatic effect on the remaining A&Es in this part of the city and it is the patients who are suffering. Many warnings were made that the closures would put real pressure on other hospitals, but these were ignored. On top of this, with most trusts facing severe squeezes on their budgets, patients in London are facing a very difficult couple of years. I understand that the problems stem from the fact that the Trust has insufficient A&E consultants to provide proper supervision of the junior doctors working there. The wider health service has rallied around to help identify extra consultant cover. This includes partners from north and central London including the Royal Free Hospital and University College Hospital. I understand that the hospital is implementing a plan over the next eight months that will make its A&E compliant with regulator standards.
As you all know, my powers with respect to the NHS are limited, but I am considering the best way to campaign for extra powers to plan and co‑ordinate NHS services across London, to be a champion for London’s NHS, to fight for greater support for general practitioners (GPs), A&Es, the London Ambulance Service (LAS) and mental health services and to launch a review of the provision of bus services to London’s hospitals. Furthermore, I expect to meet Anne Rainsberry, the Regional Director for NHS London, shortly and we will discuss this and other issues. There is also a request for an oral update, Mr Chairman, from Assembly Member Kurten. Last week I took action to ban unhealthy body image adverts on the transport network. From next month, Transport for London (TfL) will not allow ads that could reasonably be seen as likely to cause pressure to conform to an unrealistic or unhealthy body shape or as likely to create body- confidence issues, particularly among young people. Many Londoners are extremely concerned about this kind of advertising, which can demean people, particularly women, and make them ashamed of their bodies. It is high time it came to an end.
TfL will continue to work with brands and agencies to support great advertising and suggest variations. where required. to bring ads that may not at first adhere to the policy into compliance. The Committee of Advertising Practice will continue to review ad campaigns referred to them to ensure they meet Advertising Standards Authority regulations. TfL will then make a decision on advertisements that meet Advertising Standards Authority regulations and the TfL advertising policy. I have also asked TfL and its advertising partners, Exterion Media and JCDecaux, to establish an advertising steering group made up of a range of stakeholders reflecting the full diversity of London to monitor TfL’s approach to advertising and to keep its policy under regular review.