DOCSLIB.ORG

Development of the Heliocentric (Sun-‐Centered) Model

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Development of the Heliocentric (Sun-‐Centered) Model Development of the Heliocentric (Sun-Centered) Model The sequence of events that brought most humans to a heliocentric model is a great example of the scientific process. Humans make a model and then change the model after collecting more data. The first big problem with the geocentric (earth-centered) model (in which the sun and all stars move around a stationary earth) was the retrograde motion of planets like Mars. If you looked at the location of Mars each night, it might sometimes do this. Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech How does the earth-centric model deal with this new evidence? Here are some highlights. • Ptolemy develops an earth-centric model that has the sun and planets moving around the Earth. However, in order to account for retrograde motion, he put the planets on circles that move in circles. • Copernicus suggests a heliocentric (sun-centric) model. His model has the planets moving around the Sun in circular orbits. This can explain retrograde motion, but his model doesn’t fit all the planetary position data that well. Really, it’s no better than Ptolemy’s earth-centric model. • Kepler proposes that the planets do not orbit in circles. Instead, they have elliptical orbits. This agrees with the observational data very well. • Galileo gets a telescope and looks at the sky. He see stuff that suggests the Earth orbits the Sun. I’ll discuss these in a bit. • Newton develops a model for gravity that also says planets would have elliptical orbits. • This change from earth-centric to heliocentric took a long time. It’s silly to think that people just woke up one day and said “Ah ha! Let’s put the sun in the center!” Sacramento Area Science Project © 2014 [email protected] How Can You Tell the Earth Orbits the Sun? No one likes to just trust the textbook. You don’t have to. Here are some things you can do to determine for yourself what orbits what. 1. Phases of Venus. The next time Venus is visible in the sky, take a look at it a small telescope. It will probably look something like this. and on a different night: http://linksthroughspace.blogspot.com/2012_05_01_archive.html This is something that Galileo saw in his telescope. Although it looks like the moon, this object is the planet Venus. What does this mean? It means three things. First, we can see Venus because it reflects light from the Sun. Second, as the phases change, we are seeing Venus at different angles from the sun. Third, Venus is sometimes closer to us than the Sun and sometimes farther away. You would see a “full phase” Venus when it is on the other side of the Sun. If both Venus and the sun orbit the earth, why is Venus sometimes farther away from the sun, and sometimes closer to earth? And why would its phases change over time? 2. Moons of Jupiter. This is something else that Galileo did that you can repeat: see the moons of Jupiter. You just need good binoculars. Look at Jupiter and it will look something like this: Image: NASA/JPL/Malin Space Science Systems Well, it won’t look quite like that. You will probably just see Jupiter as a dot without any details. But you WILL be able to see the 4 big moons of Jupiter. So what? The idea that all the planets (and the Sun) orbit the Earth isn’t as strong once you show that there are objects that orbit another planet. These moons of Jupiter clearly orbit Jupiter and not the Earth. Sacramento Area Science Project © 2014 [email protected] 3. Parallax of Stars. To collect this evidence, you would need a very high powered telescope and at least 6 months of patience. What is parallax? Parallax is the apparent change in position of objects due to a change in observation location. You can also easily see an example of parallax by holding your thumb out in front of your face. Using just your left eye look at where the thumb lines up with some object in the distant background. Now look with just your right eye – the thumb moved, right? That’s parallax since your two eyes are at different locations. The ancient Greeks hypothesized that if the Earth is moving around the Sun then the stars should shift their positions due to this orbital motion (called stellar parallax). http://physics.unm.edu/101lab/lab4/images/Parallax_Stars2_03.gif It sounds pretty easy, but in practice, it is very difficult. The ancient Greeks couldn’t do it. This is because the shifts in apparent star position are very small (earth’s change in position around the sun is miniscule compared to the distances to stars). The first successful measurement of stellar parallax came more than two hundred years after the invention of the telescope (by Friedrich Bessel in 1838). About 60 stellar parallaxes had been measured by the end of the 19th century. Our current best large set of parallax measurements are from the Hipparcos satellite which retired in 1993. These parallax measurements are only possible because the earth moves around the sun. If the sun orbited earth, star parallax would not occur. Primary Source: How Do We Know the Earth Orbits the Sun? By Rhett Allain 04.14.14 http://www.wired.com/2014/04/how-do-we-know-the-earth-orbits-the-sun/ Additional Sources & References: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_parallax http://spiff.rit.edu/classes/phys301/lectures/parallax/parallax.html http://sci.esa.int/gaia/54414-gaia-go-for-science/ Sacramento Area Science Project © 2014 [email protected] .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Resolved Astrometric Binary Stars Brian D. Mason
    Resolved Astrometric Binary Stars Brian D. Mason 9/12/2012 U.S. Naval Observatory 1 Background Astrometric contributions of Friedrich Bessel (1784-1846) •Parallax of 61 Cygni (1838) U.S. Naval Observatory Background Astrometric contributions of Friedrich Bessel (1784-1846) •Parallax of 61 Cygni (1838) •Non-linear proper motion of Sirius and Procyon (1844) Image: http://vega.lpl.arizona.edu/sirius/A5.html U.S. Naval Observatory Background Astrometric contributions of Friedrich Bessel (1784-1846) •Parallax of 61 Cygni (1838) •Non-linear proper motion of Sirius and Procyon (1844) Due to stellar types (main- sequence and white dwarf) motion affect significant, but Image: http://vega.lpl.arizona.edu/sirius/A5.html companion hard to detect. • Sirius B first resolved in 1862 by Alvan Graham Clark (right) testing 18.5 ” Clark refractor. U.S. Naval Observatory Background Astrometric contributions of Friedrich Bessel (1784-1846) •Parallax of 61 Cygni (1838) •Non-linear proper motion of Sirius and Procyon (1844) Due to stellar types (main- sequence and white dwarf) motion affect significant, but companion hard to detect. • Sirius B first resolved in 1862 by Alvan Graham Clark (right) testing 18.5 ” Clark refractor. • Procyon B first resolved in 1896 by John Martin Schaeberle with Lick 36 ” Clark refractor. U.S. Naval Observatory CurrentCurrent Orbit: Orbit: Procyon Sirius AB AB • Broken line is line of nodes. • Green plus signs and asterisks: micrometry. • Pink asterisks: photography • Blue circles: HST/WFPC2 • Scales on axis are in arcseconds. • Direction of orbital motion at lower right. • Sirius Period = 50.090y. • Procyon Period = 40.82y. U.S. Naval Observatory Orbits • The 6 th Catalog of Orbits of Visual Binary Stars has 2298 orbits of 2187 systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Essays-Mechanics / Electrodynamics/Download/8831
    WHAT IF THE GALILEO AFFAIR NEVER HAPPENED? ABSTRACT From the 5th Century A.D. to the advent of Scholastic Aristotelianism, the curriculum in Roman Catholic universities in Europe taught a Rotating Geocentric Earth. St. Thomas Aquinas (1225 A.D.-1274 A.D.) introduced the writings of Aristotle (384 B.C.-322 B.C.) and of Claudius Ptolemy (100 A.D.-170 A.D.) in the 13th Century A.D., and the curriculum changed to teach a Non-Rotating Geocentric Earth. In this GSJ presentation, an Alternate History is presented. The famous Trial of Galileo never happened and the book by Nicolaus Copernicus was never banned by the Vatican of the Roman Catholic Church. The Roman Catholic Church simply ignored Galileo & his insulting book of 1632 A.D. The Roman Catholic Church Astronomers produced the Gregorian Calendar in 1583 A.D. The Roman Catholic Astronomers had abandoned the Aristotle/Ptolemy Model of Astronomy and had replaced it with the Non-Rotating Tychonian Model. This is NOT Alternate History. Johann Kepler published. That is NOT Alternate History. Isaac Newton published Principia, too. Christian Huygens contributed to the technology of the Mechanical Clock. Mechanical Time and Sundial Time demonstrate two similar but not identical paths. This is NOT Alternate History, either. The writer that is known as Voltaire (1694-1778) campaigned for Newton’s Principia as did Willem Gravesande (1688-1742). Pierre-Simon LaPlace (1748-1827) rescued Newton’s Celestial Mechanics of Universal Gravitation and Kepler’s Elliptical Orbits from disequilibrium issues in 1804A.D. Friedrich Bessel (1784-1846) discovered the first star to exhibit Stellar Parallax in 1838.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Statistics, UCLA
    UCLA Department of Statistics, UCLA Title Determination of the Accuracy of the Observations, by C. F. Gauss, Translation with preface Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4n21q6bx Author Ekström, Joakim Publication Date 2013-11-12 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Determination of the Accuracy of the Observations by Carl Friedrich Gauss. Translation by Joakim Ekström, with preface. Af«±§Zh±. Bestimmung der Genauigkeit der Beobachtungen is the second of the three major pieces that Gauss wrote on statistical hypothesis generation. It continues the methodological tradition of eoria Motus, producing estimates by maximizing probability density, however absence of the change-of- variables theorem causes technical diculties that compromise its elegance. In eoria Combinationis, Gauss abandoned the aforementioned method, hence placing Bestimmung der Genauigkeit at a cross- roads in the evolution of Gauss’s statistical hypothesis generation methodology. e present translation is paired with a preface discussing the piece and its historical context. Õ ó Translator’s Preface and Discussion by Joakim Ekström, UCLA Statistics Carl Friedrich Gauss (Õßßß-Õ¢¢) published three major pieces on statistical hypothesis generation: eoria Motus (ÕþÉ), Bestimmung der Genauigkeit (ÕÕä) and eoria Combinationis (ÕóÕ) (see Sheynin, ÕÉßÉ). eoria Motus was translated into English by C. H. Davis in Õ¢, eoria Combina- tionis was translated into English by G. W. Stewart in ÕÉÉ¢, but an English translation of Bestimmung der Genauigkeit has, in spite of great eorts, not been found in the literature. Hence the present translation. Bestimmung der Genauigkeit der Beobachtungen, as its complete title reads, is an interesting histor- ical text for many reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • The Flint River Observer
    who attended the first club meeting in 1997, only five are still in FRAC: co-founders Larry Higgins, THE Ken Walburn and Bill Warren, and charter members Steven “Saratoga Smitty” Smith and John Wallace. FLINT RIVER Two thing occurred to me recently. First, many of you have never met the men who started FRAC and kept it going when no one OBSERVER outside the club thought it would survive. To borrow from Sir Isaac Newton’s famous statement, NEWSLETTER OF THE FLINT Larry, Ken, Bill, Smitty and John are the giants RIVER ASTRONOMY CLUB upon whose shoulders FRAC stands today. The second thing that occurred to me was, I An Affiliate of the Astronomical League can’t recall ever seeing them together at one time. Well, all of them will be at the July club Vol. 20, No. 2 June, 2016 meeting. Our program will be “1997: FRAC’s Officers: President, Dwight Harness (1770 First Year,” with refreshments afterward. So mark th Hollonville Rd., Brooks, Ga. 30205, 770-227-9321, down Thursday, July 14 as a special day on your [email protected]); Vice President, Bill calendar and please try to attend. It will be a night Warren (1212 Everee Inn Rd., Griffin, Ga. 30224, to remember. [email protected]); Secretary, Carlos Flores; Treasurer, Truman Boyle. -Dwight Harness Board of Directors: Larry Higgins; Aaron Calhoun; and Jeremy Milligan. * * * Facebook Coordinator: Laura Harness; Alcor, Last Month’s Meeting/Activities. As anyone who Carlos Flores; Webmaster, Tom Moore; has been in FRAC for longer than 15 minutes Program Coordinator/Newsletter Editor, Bill knows, our observing mantra has always been, Do Warren; Observing Coordinators, Dwight the best you can with what you have.
    [Show full text]
  • Thinking Outside the Sphere Views of the Stars from Aristotle to Herschel Thinking Outside the Sphere
    Thinking Outside the Sphere Views of the Stars from Aristotle to Herschel Thinking Outside the Sphere A Constellation of Rare Books from the History of Science Collection The exhibition was made possible by generous support from Mr. & Mrs. James B. Hebenstreit and Mrs. Lathrop M. Gates. CATALOG OF THE EXHIBITION Linda Hall Library Linda Hall Library of Science, Engineering and Technology Cynthia J. Rogers, Curator 5109 Cherry Street Kansas City MO 64110 1 Thinking Outside the Sphere is held in copyright by the Linda Hall Library, 2010, and any reproduction of text or images requires permission. The Linda Hall Library is an independently funded library devoted to science, engineering and technology which is used extensively by The exhibition opened at the Linda Hall Library April 22 and closed companies, academic institutions and individuals throughout the world. September 18, 2010. The Library was established by the wills of Herbert and Linda Hall and opened in 1946. It is located on a 14 acre arboretum in Kansas City, Missouri, the site of the former home of Herbert and Linda Hall. Sources of images on preliminary pages: Page 1, cover left: Peter Apian. Cosmographia, 1550. We invite you to visit the Library or our website at www.lindahlll.org. Page 1, right: Camille Flammarion. L'atmosphère météorologie populaire, 1888. Page 3, Table of contents: Leonhard Euler. Theoria motuum planetarum et cometarum, 1744. 2 Table of Contents Introduction Section1 The Ancient Universe Section2 The Enduring Earth-Centered System Section3 The Sun Takes
    [Show full text]
  • Astrometry and Optics During the Past 2000 Years
    1 Astrometry and optics during the past 2000 years Erik Høg Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark 2011.05.03: Collection of reports from November 2008 ABSTRACT: The satellite missions Hipparcos and Gaia by the European Space Agency will together bring a decrease of astrometric errors by a factor 10000, four orders of magnitude, more than was achieved during the preceding 500 years. This modern development of astrometry was at first obtained by photoelectric astrometry. An experiment with this technique in 1925 led to the Hipparcos satellite mission in the years 1989-93 as described in the following reports Nos. 1 and 10. The report No. 11 is about the subsequent period of space astrometry with CCDs in a scanning satellite. This period began in 1992 with my proposal of a mission called Roemer, which led to the Gaia mission due for launch in 2013. My contributions to the history of astrometry and optics are based on 50 years of work in the field of astrometry but the reports cover spans of time within the past 2000 years, e.g., 400 years of astrometry, 650 years of optics, and the “miraculous” approval of the Hipparcos satellite mission during a few months of 1980. 2011.05.03: Collection of reports from November 2008. The following contains overview with summary and link to the reports Nos. 1-9 from 2008 and Nos. 10-13 from 2011. The reports are collected in two big file, see details on p.8. CONTENTS of Nos. 1-9 from 2008 No. Title Overview with links to all reports 2 1 Bengt Strömgren and modern astrometry: 5 Development of photoelectric astrometry including the Hipparcos mission 1A Bengt Strömgren and modern astrometry ..
    [Show full text]
  • Rabbi Reuven Landau and the Jewish Reaction to Copernican Thought in Nineteenth Century Europe
    JEREMY BROWN Rabbi Reuven Landau and the Jewish Reaction to Copernican Thought in Nineteenth Century Europe n the opening years of this century, Rabbi Shlomo Benizri, once Israel’s Minister of Labor and Social Affairs, published a comprehen- sive textbook on the Jewish calendar titled Ha-shamayim Mesapperim I 1 (The Heavens Proclaim). Most of R. Benizri’s work covers the complex mathematical and astronomical foundations which determine the struc- ture of the lunar based Jewish calendar, and the last part of the book describes the nature of the solar system. In this last section, R. Benizri concludes that despite nearly five hundred years of scientific and astro- nomical evidence to the contrary, it is the sun that revolves around the earth, not vice-versa. Although R. Benizri was educated in traditional Orthodox yeshivot and never attended university, his book made use of many modern scientific instruments and discoveries. It reproduced high resolution telescopic images of the surface of the planets (including those sent from the famous Viking 1 Project) and described the composition of the atmosphere and surface of the planets using data from NASA’s solar explorations. And yet, after a lengthy analysis, R. Benizri stated that the earth does not orbit the sun, because, in his account, the Bible, the rabbis of the Talmud and their medieval commentators had all concluded that the earth lay at the center of the universe. JEREMY BROWN, M.D., is Associate Professor and Director of Research in the Department of Emergency Medicine at the George Washington University in Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 5: Stellar Distances 10/2/19, 802 AM
    Lecture 5: Stellar Distances 10/2/19, 802 AM Astronomy 162: Introduction to Stars, Galaxies, & the Universe Prof. Richard Pogge, MTWThF 9:30 Lecture 5: Distances of the Stars Readings: Ch 19, section 19-1 Key Ideas Distance is the most important & most difficult quantity to measure in Astronomy Method of Trigonometric Parallaxes Direct geometric method of finding distances Units of Cosmic Distance: Light Year Parsec (Parallax second) Why are Distances Important? Distances are necessary for estimating: Total energy emitted by an object (Luminosity) Masses of objects from their orbital motions True motions through space of stars Physical sizes of objects The problem is that distances are very hard to measure... The problem of measuring distances Question: How do you measure the distance of something that is beyond the reach of your measuring instruments? http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit1/distances.html Page 1 of 7 Lecture 5: Stellar Distances 10/2/19, 802 AM Examples of such problems: Large-scale surveying & mapping problems. Military range finding to targets Measuring distances to any astronomical object Answer: You resort to using GEOMETRY to find the distance. The Method of Trigonometric Parallaxes Nearby stars appear to move with respect to more distant background stars due to the motion of the Earth around the Sun. This apparent motion (it is not "true" motion) is called Stellar Parallax. (Click on the image to view at full scale [Size: 177Kb]) In the picture above, the line of sight to the star in December is different than that in June, when the Earth is on the other side of its orbit.
    [Show full text]
  • ATTENTION: Epreuve Non Définitive!!!
    Verrier, Urbain-Jean-Joseph Le V 1 Verrier, Urbain-Jean-Joseph Le Born Saint-Lô, Manche, France, 11 March 1811 Died Paris, France, 23 September 1877 Urbain-Jean-Joseph le Verrier explained the unruly behavior of Uranus by positing the existence of an unknown planet, which was subsequently discovered and named Neptune. His father, Louis-Baptiste le Verrier, a civil servant, and mother, Pauline de Baudre, came from the lower Norman aristocracy. Th eir only son received his lycée education in Cherbourg, and failed the entrance examination to the École Polytechnique on his fi rst try but was admitted in 1831. In 1837, he married Lucille Marie Clothilde Choquet, the daughter of his former teacher. Th ey had three children: Léon, Lucille, and Urbain. In 1837, le Verrier was off ered a position in geodesy and machines as an assistant to Félix Savary at the École Polytechnique. Aft er Savary’s death a few years later, le Verrier succeeded him to the chair in astronomy. He devoted his attention to celestial mechanics to reclaim the heritage of Pierre de Laplace . His fi rst memoir presented to the Paris Academy of Sciences addressed Laplace’s solution to the stability of the Solar System. Later, le Verrier laid the groundwork for a new theory of Mercury’s orbit and successfully tackled the theory of several recently discovered periodic comets, on the basis of which he was successful in his bid for a seat at the academy on 19 January 1846. Two months earlier, le Verrier had published his fi rst memoir on Uranus’s orbital irregularities, a work he had undertaken with encouragement by François Arago .
    [Show full text]
  • Another Unit of Distance (I Like This One Better): Light Year
    How far away are the nearest stars? Last time: • Distances to stars can be measured via measurement of parallax (trigonometric parallax, stellar parallax) • Defined two units to be used in describing stellar distances (parsec and light year) Which stars are they? Another unit of distance (I like this A new unit of distance: the parsec one better): light year A parsec is the distance of a star whose parallax is 1 arcsecond. A light year is the distance a light ray travels in one year A star with a parallax of 1/2 arcsecond is at a distance of 2 parsecs. A light year is: • 9.460E+15 meters What is the parsec? • 3.26 light years = 1 parsec • 3.086 E+16 meters • 206,265 astronomical units The distances to the stars are truly So what are the distances to the stars? enormous • If the distance between the Earth and Sun were • First measurements made in 1838 (Friedrich Bessel) shrunk to 1 cm (0.4 inches), Alpha Centauri • Closest star is Alpha would be 2.75 km (1.7 miles) away Centauri, p=0.75 arcseconds, d=1.33 parsecs= 4.35 light years • Nearest stars are a few to many parsecs, 5 - 20 light years 1 When we look at the night sky, which So, who are our neighbors in space? are the nearest stars? Altair… 5.14 parsecs = 16.8 light years Look at Appendix 12 of the book (stars nearer than 4 parsecs or 13 light years) The nearest stars • 34 stars within 13 light years of the Sun • The 34 stars are contained in 25 star systems • Those visible to the naked eye are Alpha Centauri (A & B), Sirius, Epsilon Eridani, Epsilon Indi, Tau Ceti, and Procyon • We won’t see any of them tonight! Stars we can see with our eyes that are relatively close to the Sun A history of progress in measuring stellar distances • Arcturus … 36 light years • Parallaxes for even close stars • Vega … 26 light years are tiny and hard to measure • From Abell “Exploration of the • Altair … 17 light years Universe”, 1966: “For only about • Beta Canum Venaticorum .
    [Show full text]
  • A Tribute to Loránd Eötvös
    LORÁND EÖTVÖS FEATURES A TRIBUTE TO LORA´ ND EO¨ TVO¨ S l Henk Kubbinga – University of Groningen (The Netherlands) – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/epn/2020405 The last decades of the 19th century Hungary came to flourish as an independent part of the Austrian-Hungarian Monarchy; 1867 was a crucial year, a year of ‘Ausgleich’, ‘Compromise’. Jo´zsef Eo¨tvo¨s, Hungary’s leading intellectual and Cabinet Minister, reorganized science. He sent his son to Heidelberg, where junior learned physics from i.a. Bunsen, Helmholtz and Kirchhoff. What more could a youngster wish for? Roland Eo¨tvo¨s returned home with a predilection for fundamental matters, most of all for the nature of gravity and its relation to inertia. Geophysics, Hungary’s pride, finally took centre stage. Politics, science, fundamental science In order to be prepared for an eventual political ca- reer, like that of his father, Loránd Eötvös studied law at Budapest’s University (1865-1867), before definitely switching to physics, mathematics and chemistry. On 7 July 1870, he passed the PhD under supervision of Gustav Kirchhoff in Heidelberg without a formal dis- sertation. In 1872 he was nominated Professor of Physics at the University of Budapest, the university which, since 1950, carries his name. In the mid 1880s an interest in gravitation became ap- parent, in all probability initiated by the first results of the triangulation campaign of the territory of Austria- Hungary (1860-1913) with the European degree meas- urement in the background. Gravitation—or gravity, if you please—had been part of the physicist’s subconscious- ness since Newton, and every now and then it resurfaced, mostly in the context of a debate on conservation laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Riemannian Reading: Using Manifolds to Calculate and Unfold
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications 2017 Riemannian Reading: Using Manifolds to Calculate and Unfold Narrative Heather Lamb Eastern Illinois University This research is a product of the graduate program in English at Eastern Illinois University. Find out more about the program. Recommended Citation Lamb, Heather, "Riemannian Reading: Using Manifolds to Calculate and Unfold Narrative" (2017). Masters Theses. 2688. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/2688 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Graduate School� EA<.TEH.NILLINOIS UNJVER.SITY" Thesis Maintenance and Reproduction Certificate FOR: Graduate Candidates Completing Theses in Partial Fulfillment of the Degree Graduate Faculty Advisors Directing the Theses RE: Preservation, Reproduction, and Distribution of Thesis Research Preserving, reproducing, and distributing thesis research is an important part of Booth Library's responsibility to provide access to scholarship. In order to further this goal, Booth Library makes all graduate theses completed as part of a degree program at Eastern Illinois University available for personal study, research, and other not-for-profit educational purposes. Under 17 U.S.C. § 108, the library may reproduce and distribute a copy without infringing on copyright; however, professional courtesy dictates that permission be requested from the author before doing so. Your signatures affirm the following: • The graduate candidate is the author of this thesis. • The graduate candidate retains the copyright and intellectual property rights associated with the original research, creative activity, and intellectual or artistic content of the thesis.
    [Show full text]