Pre-Columbian Raised Fields in Panama
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Archaeological Central American Maize Genomes Suggest Ancient Gene Flow from South America
Archaeological Central American maize genomes suggest ancient gene flow from South America Logan Kistlera,1, Heather B. Thakarb, Amber M. VanDerwarkerc, Alejandra Domicd,e, Anders Bergströmf, Richard J. Georgec, Thomas K. Harperd, Robin G. Allabyg, Kenneth Hirthd, and Douglas J. Kennettc,1 aDepartment of Anthropology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560; bDepartment of Anthropology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843; cDepartment of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106; dDepartment of Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; eDepartment of Geosciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; fAncient Genomics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, NW1 1AT London, United Kingdom; and gSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, CV4 7AL Coventry, United Kingdom Edited by David L. Lentz, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, and accepted by Editorial Board Member Elsa M. Redmond November 3, 2020 (received for review July 24, 2020) Maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) domestication began in southwestern 16). However, precolonial backflow of divergent maize varieties Mexico ∼9,000 calendar years before present (cal. BP) and humans into Central and Mesoamerica during the last 9,000 y remains dispersed this important grain to South America by at least 7,000 understudied, and could have ramifications for the history of cal. BP as a partial domesticate. South America served as a second- maize as a staple in the region. ary improvement center where the domestication syndrome be- Morphological evidence from ancient maize found in ar- came fixed and new lineages emerged in parallel with similar chaeological sites combined with DNA data confirms a complex processes in Mesoamerica. -
Popped Secret: the Mysterious Origin of Corn Film Guide Educator Materials
Popped Secret: The Mysterious Origin of Corn Film Guide Educator Materials OVERVIEW In the HHMI film Popped Secret: The Mysterious Origin of Corn, evolutionary biologist Dr. Neil Losin embarks on a quest to discover the origin of maize (or corn). While the wild varieties of common crops, such as apples and wheat, looked much like the cultivated species, there are no wild plants that closely resemble maize. As the film unfolds, we learn how geneticists and archaeologists have come together to unravel the mysteries of how and where maize was domesticated nearly 9,000 years ago. KEY CONCEPTS A. Humans have transformed wild plants into useful crops by artificially selecting and propagating individuals with the most desirable traits or characteristics—such as size, color, or sweetness—over generations. B. Evidence of early maize domestication comes from many disciplines including evolutionary biology, genetics, and archaeology. C. The analysis of shared characteristics among different species, including extinct ones, enables scientists to determine evolutionary relationships. D. In general, the more closely related two groups of organisms are, the more similar their DNA sequences will be. Scientists can estimate how long ago two populations of organisms diverged by comparing their genomes. E. When the number of genes is relatively small, mathematical models based on Mendelian genetics can help scientists estimate how many genes are involved in the differences in traits between species. F. Regulatory genes code for proteins, such as transcription factors, that in turn control the expression of several—even hundreds—of other genes. As a result, changes in just a few regulatory genes can have a dramatic effect on traits. -
Indigenous Peoples in Latin America: Statistical Information
Indigenous Peoples in Latin America: Statistical Information Updated August 5, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46225 SUMMARY R46225 Indigenous Peoples in Latin America: Statistical August 5, 2021 Information Carla Y. Davis-Castro This report provides statistical information on Indigenous peoples in Latin America. Data and Research Librarian findings vary, sometimes greatly, on all topics covered in this report, including populations and languages, socioeconomic data, land and natural resources, human rights and international legal conventions. For example the figure below shows four estimates for the Indigenous population of Latin America ranging from 41.8 million to 53.4 million. The statistics vary depending on the source methodology, changes in national censuses, the number of countries covered, and the years examined. Indigenous Population and Percentage of General Population of Latin America Sources: Graphic created by CRS using the World Bank’s LAC Equity Lab with webpage last updated in July 2021; ECLAC and FILAC’s 2020 Los pueblos indígenas de América Latina - Abya Yala y la Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible: tensiones y desafíos desde una perspectiva territorial; the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and World Bank’s (WB) 2015 Indigenous Latin America in the twenty-first century: the first decade; and ECLAC’s 2014 Guaranteeing Indigenous people’s rights in Latin America: Progress in the past decade and remaining challenges. Notes: The World Bank’s LAC Equity Lab -
The Archaeology of Maize
chapter 1 The Archaeology of Maize the domesticators domesticated The story of maize begins at least 9,000 years ago in southwestern Mex- ico as small groups of nomadic people found themselves attracted to stands of a rather tall, bushy tropical grass now known as teosinte (fi gure 1.1). We don’t know what name these early indigenous Mexi- cans had for teosinte, but by the time of the Spanish Conquest there were many names for it, including cincocopi, acecintle, atzitzintle.1 Today evidence of these fi rst farmers and the teosinte plants they har- vested is almost invisible—but we can see some traces left behind by the early descendants of both the plants and the people. For example, pho- tographs of the tiny maize cobs, classifi ed as Zea mays ssp. mays, that were found in Guilá Naquitz cave, Oaxaca, by Kent Flannery and his crew in the mid-1960s show parts of the earliest known individual plants that are descended from an ancestral teosinte plant (fi gures 1.2 and 1.3).2 In order for these cobs, which are directly dated to 6,230 cal BP,3 to have existed, not only did the ancient Oaxaqueños living near Guilá Naquitz cave have to have planted individual seeds, but their ancestors and neighbors also had to have planted and harvested teosinte seeds for hundreds of previous generations. We do not know if these particular early Oaxacan maize plants themselves had descendants. After all, their seeds could have been com- pletely consumed by people or animals and not gone on to propagate 17 BBlakelake - 99780520276871.indd780520276871.indd 1717 005/06/155/06/15 99:06:06 PPMM figure 1.1. -
Visualization and Collaborative Practice in Paleoethnobotany
ARTICLE VISUALIZATION AND COLLABORATIVE PRACTICE IN PALEOETHNOBOTANY Jessica M. Herlich and Shanti Morell-Hart Jessica M. Herlich is a Ph.D. candidate at the College of William and Mary and Shanti Morell-Hart is Assistant Professor at McMaster University. aleoethnobotany lends unique insight into past lived Methodologies, Practices, and Multi-Proxy Understandings experiences, landscape reconstruction, and ethnoecolog- There are many methodologies within paleoethnobotany that ical connections. A wide array of paleoethnobotanical P lead to distinct yet complementary pieces of information, methodologies equips us to negotiate complementary under- whether due to scale of residue (chemical to architectural) or the standings of the human past. From entire wood sea vessels to technology available (hand loupes to full laboratory facilities). individual plant cells, all sizes of botanical remains can be The limits of archaeobotanical analysis are constantly expand- addressed through the tools available to an archaeobotanist. As ing as the accessibility and capabilities of technology improve. paleoethnobotanical interpretation is interwoven with other This is true for microscopes and software, which make it possi- threads of information, an enriched vision of the relationships ble for a paleoethnobotanist to capture and enhance the small- between landscape and people develops. est of cellular structures, and for telecommunications and digi- tal records, which are expanding the possibilities for decipher- Collaboration is a necessary component for archaeobotanical ing archaeobotanical material and for collaborating with distant analysis and interpretation. Through collaboration we make stakeholders. Improvements in technology are an integral part the invisible visible, the unintelligible intelligible, the unknow- of the exciting future of paleoethnobotany, which includes col- able knowable. -
Â•Š the Tule Upheaval in Eastern Panama, 1727-1728
Bryn Mawr College Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College History Faculty Research and Scholarship History 2001 “Haven’t We Come To Kill the Spaniards?” The Tule Upheaval in Eastern Panama, 1727-1728 Ignacio Gallup-Diaz Bryn Mawr College, [email protected] Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.brynmawr.edu/history_pubs Part of the History Commons Custom Citation Gallup-Diaz, Ignacio. "'Haven't We Come to Kill the Spaniards?' The uleT Upheaval in Eastern Panama, 1727-1728." Colonial Latin American Review 10, no. 2 (2001): 251-271. This paper is posted at Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College. http://repository.brynmawr.edu/history_pubs/15 For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 “Haven’t We Come To Kill the Spaniards?” The Tule1 Upheaval in Eastern Panamá, 1727-8 Ignacio Gallup-Diaz Bryn Mawr College This paper investigates a Tule Indian uprising that took place in eastern Panamá in 1727. It aims to throw new light upon that little-studied event by making use of previously unconsulted documentary evidence drawn from Spanish archives. Previous discussions of the uprising, provided by anthropologists and historians who have not examined the full range of relevant source material, have embedded it firmly within a putative narrative of Tule history that is characterized by the group’s staunch, single-minded opposition to outside domination. Eastern Panamá’s Indians, it is assumed, did nothing for three hundred years but oppose the Spanish, carrying out the series of rebellions, uprisings, and oppositions that are thought to comprise an impressive and durable rejection of imperial domination. -
The Impact of COVID-19 on Indigenous Peoples in Latin America (Abya Yala)
PROJECT DOCUMENTS The impact of COVID-19 on indigenous peoples in Latin America (Abya Yala) Between invisibility and collective resistance Thank you for your interest in this ECLAC publication ECLAC Publications Please register if you would like to receive information on our editorial products and activities. When you register, you may specify your particular areas of interest and you will gain access to our products in other formats. www.cepal.org/en/publications ublicaciones www.cepal.org/apps Project Documents The impact of COVID-19 on indigenous peoples in Latin America (Abya Yala) Between invisibility and collective resistance This document was prepared by the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), jointly with the regional offices of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN-Women); the International Labour Organization (ILO); the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA); the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF); the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO); the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the Fund for the Development of the Indigenous Peoples of Latin America and the Caribbean (FILAC), within the framework of the activities of the Regional Interagency Group on Indigenous Peoples in Latin America and the Caribbean (GIRPI). This document was prepared thanks to contributions from Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) of Germany. The boundaries and names shown -
Archaeologically Defining the Earlier Garden Landscapes at Morven: Preliminary Results
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons University of Pennsylvania Museum of University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology Papers Archaeology and Anthropology 1987 Archaeologically Defining the Earlier Garden Landscapes at Morven: Preliminary Results Anne E. Yentsch Naomi F. Miller University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Barbara Paca Dolores Piperno Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/penn_museum_papers Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Yentsch, A. E., Miller, N. F., Paca, B., & Piperno, D. (1987). Archaeologically Defining the Earlier Garden Landscapes at Morven: Preliminary Results. Northeast Historical Archaeology, 16 (1), 1-29. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/penn_museum_papers/26 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/penn_museum_papers/26 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Archaeologically Defining the Earlier Garden Landscapes at Morven: Preliminary Results Abstract The first phase of archaeology at Morven was designed to test the potential for further study of the early garden landscape at a ca. 1758 house in Princeton, New jersey. The research included intensive botanical analysis using a variety of archaeobotanical techniques integrated within a broader ethnobotanical framework. A study was also made of the garden's topography using map analysis combined with subsurface testing. Information on garden features related to the design of earlier garden surfaces -
Arturo Arias University of California, Merced
Indigenous Knowledges and Sites of Indigenous Memory ______________________________________________________ ARTURO ARIAS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MERCED Introduction This special issue of Transmodernity emphasizes Indigenous knowledges that may be represented in literary texts, or else be manifestations present in “multi-dimensional sites of indigenous knowledges,” to use Michelle Wibbelsman’s phrase in her article on this same issue, as webs of signification in the symbolic production of heterodox cultural forms in the United States, Canada, and in Latin America. Literatures and other representational forms explain beliefs, relationships of kinship, relations with nature, and ways of living within contexts of flux, paradox, or tension, articulating their perspectives, while also reconciling opposing forces disaggregating their communities. Their claims are rooted in a sophisticated worldview anchored in complex ontological and epistemological articulations, oftentimes grounded in turn on a comprehensive elucidation of cosmologies. In short, Indigenous peoples’ worldviews deviate from those that have been hegemonic in the West. Noted Brazilian anthropologist Eduardo Viveiros de Castro has stated that “the classic distinction between nature and culture cannot be used to describe domains internal to non-Western cosmologies” (45). In the last of the same series of lectures published in Cosmological Perspectivism in Amazonia and Elsewhere (2012), Viveiros de Castro defined what he labels Amerindian knowledge, primarily Amazonian, as “multinaturalism” -
Searching for and Affirming Our Christian and Indigenous Identity Jocabed Solano
The Meeting of Two Worlds: Searching for and Affirming Our Christian and Indigenous Identity Jocabed Solano ho are we, the Guna people? The question is complex and Wcannot be answered with a precise definition. We are the sum of many experiences, stories, relationships, cultures, languages, geographies, encounters with other people groups, and encounters with ourselves. The Guna are one of many people groups in Abya Yala1 whose way of life is built upon our spirituality, worldview, and story of origin; who have been transformed step by step in 1. Abya Yala is the term utilized by the Guna people and which has been adopted by many indigenous peoples to refer to the American continents. It means “fully mature land” or “the land of life’s blood.” Jocabed Reina Solano Miselis, from the Guna Yala region in Panama, is a psychology and theology student active in the Comunidad de Estudiantes Cristianos (IFES in Panama) and the FTL. She works among indigenous young people with the intersections of identity, faith, and culture. 9 Vol. 10, No. 2 BOLETIN_TEOLOGICO_JLAT_10.2.indd 9 10/11/15 2:45 p.m. Jocabed Solano coming to know other peoples and ourselves. The bridge between internal and external dialogue allows us to create new ways of see- ing life and recognize that the answer to who we are will never be static but rather dynamic. Among the Canoes: Passing through Strange Lands, the Guna Experience If the sea could speak, it would tell our story; if canoes could record memories, they would reveal the secret of the people who have lived surrounded by the sea; they would tell a story that has never been heard of a people who found their freedom through struggling and always meeting themselves and others rowing on the high seas. -
Indigenous Peoples and Climate Change
Website: www.ilo.org Website: Email: [email protected] +41227996730 Tel: Switzerland CH-1211 Geneva22 4, routedesMorillons International LabourOrganization(ILO) andEqualityDepartment Conditions ofWork EqualityandDiversity &ILOAIDSBranch Gender, 9 ISBN 978-92-2-132935-0 78 9221 329350 ILO Indigenous peoples and climate change - Emerging Research on Traditional Knowledge and Livelihoods In collaborationwith: Knowledge andLivelihoods Emerging ResearchonTraditional and climatechange Indigenous peoples Convention 169 Convention 30 years Indigenous Peoples and Climate Change: Emerging Research on Traditional Knowledge and Livelihoods Gender, Equality and Diversity & ILOAIDS Branch Copyright © International Labour Organization 2019 First published (2019) Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condi- tion that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to ILO Publications (Rights and Licensing), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: [email protected]. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with a reproduction rights organization may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. Indigenous Peoples and Climate Change: Emerging Research on Traditional Knowledge and Livelihoods ISBN: 978-92-2-132935-0 (print) ISBN: 978-92-2-132936-7 (web pdf) 4.08 ILO Cataloguing in Publication Data The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. -
Starch Grain Analysis Is One Important Avenue of Investigation in The
EXPERIMENTAL GROUND STONE TOOLS, RESOURCE PROCESSING AND STARCH GRAIN ANALYSIS: PRELIMINARY RESULTS JILL EUBANKS FAR WESTERN ANTHROPOLOGICAL RESEARCH GROUP, INC. Starch grain analysis is one important avenue of investigation in the reconstruction of prehistoric food processing, however, there has been little research done on quantifying starch deposition and preservation on artifacts. This study documents changes in starch grain deposition and morphology observed from processing of modern plant samples with different characteristics through different types of modern experimental ground stone milling tools. The results have the potential to expand our understanding of subsistence practices and make analysis techniques more comprehensive and quantifiable. Ground stones have been manufactured and used for thousands of years for a variety of purposes (Adams 2002). One of the most important functions of ground stone tools is the processing of resources for consumption. Archaeologists try to determine the function and role that ground stone milling tools have in resource processing. Ground stone milling tools have many different sizes, shapes and are produced on variety of materials. Some tools are expedient unshaped, while other tools are manufactured and deliberately shaped. Ground stone tools contain microscopic information about resource processing, subsistence practices and environmental constraints. There have been experiments involving resource processing on a variety of ground stone tool sets to describe grinding techniques (Adams 1988, 1989a, 1989b, 1993, 2002, 2010, 2014, Buonasera 2012). Dr. Tammy Buonasera is in the process of conducting an experiment using replicas of prehistoric ground stone milling tools (expedient and manufactured) made from different raw materials to process three different resources to generate data to create models of ground stone processing efficiency.