DOCSLIB.ORG

Gaspésie Lobster Trap Fishery Final Draft Report and Determination

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gaspésie Lobster Trap Fishery Final Draft Report and Determination Marine Stewardship Council fisheries assessments Gaspésie lobster trap fishery Final Draft Report and Determination Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) SAI Global Assessment team Lead Assessor, Dr. Géraldine Criquet Assessor, Dr. Jean-Claude Brêthes Assessor, Mr. Bob Allain Fishery client Regroupement des Pêcheurs Professionnels du Sud de la Gaspésie (RPPSG) Assessment Type First Reduced Reassessment Report Code MSC015/02 Report Date 13 January 2021 Form 13d Issue 3 April 2019 Page 1 of 183 1 Contents 1 Contents ............................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ 4 2 Glossary ................................................................................................................................ 6 3 Executive summary ............................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Changes since previous assessment ........................................................................................................ 7 3.1.1 Principle 1 ........................................................................................................................................... 7 3.1.2 Principle 2 ........................................................................................................................................... 7 3.1.3 Principle 3 ........................................................................................................................................... 8 3.1.4 Main strengths and weaknesses ........................................................................................................ 8 3.1.5 Draft determination reached by the assessment team ...................................................................... 9 3.1.6 Condition ............................................................................................................................................ 9 4 Report details ...................................................................................................................... 10 4.1 Authorship and peer review details ...................................................................................................... 10 4.1.1 Assessment team .............................................................................................................................. 10 4.1.2 Peer Reviewers ................................................................................................................................. 10 4.2 Version details ....................................................................................................................................... 11 5 Confirmation of scope ......................................................................................................... 12 6 Unit of Assessment and Certification and results overview .................................................. 12 6.1 Unit of Assessment and Unit of Certification ........................................................................................ 12 6.1.1 Unit of Assessment ........................................................................................................................... 12 6.1.2 Unit(s) of Certification ...................................................................................................................... 12 6.2 Assessment results overview................................................................................................................. 13 6.2.1 Determination, formal conclusion and agreement .......................................................................... 13 6.2.2 Principle level scores ......................................................................................................................... 13 6.2.3 Summary of conditions ..................................................................................................................... 13 6.2.4 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................ 13 7 Evaluation results ................................................................................................................ 15 7.1 Eligibility date ........................................................................................................................................ 15 7.2 Traceability within the fishery ............................................................................................................... 15 7.3 Eligibility to enter further chains of custody ......................................................................................... 15 8 Scoring ................................................................................................................................ 17 8.1 Summary of Performance Indicator level scores .................................................................................. 17 8.2 Principle 1 .............................................................................................................................................. 18 8.2.1 Principle 1 background ..................................................................................................................... 18 8.2.2 Catch profiles .................................................................................................................................... 29 8.2.3 Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and catch data .................................................................................... 30 8.2.4 Principle 1 Performance Indicator scores and rationales ................................................................. 32 PI 1.1.1 – Stock status ................................................................................................................................... 32 PI 1.1.2 – Stock rebuilding ............................................................................................................................. 34 PI 1.2.1 – Harvest strategy ............................................................................................................................ 36 PI 1.2.2 – Harvest control rules and tools ..................................................................................................... 40 PI 1.2.3 – Information and monitoring ......................................................................................................... 43 PI 1.2.4 – Assessment of stock status ........................................................................................................... 46 8.3 Principle 2 .............................................................................................................................................. 48 8.3.1 Principle 2 background ..................................................................................................................... 48 8.3.2 Principle 2 Performance Indicator scores and rationales ................................................................. 66 PI 2.1.1 – Primary species outcome .............................................................................................................. 66 Form 13d Issue 3 April 2019 Page 2 of 183 PI 2.1.2 – Primary species management strategy ........................................................................................ 69 PI 2.1.3 – Primary species information ......................................................................................................... 74 PI 2.2.1 – Secondary species outcome .......................................................................................................... 78 PI 2.2.2 – Secondary species management strategy .................................................................................... 80 PI 2.2.3 – Secondary species information ..................................................................................................... 84 PI 2.3.1 – ETP species outcome ..................................................................................................................... 87 PI 2.3.2 – ETP species management strategy ............................................................................................... 92 PI 2.3.3 – ETP species information ................................................................................................................ 99 PI 2.4.1 – Habitats outcome ........................................................................................................................ 101 PI 2.4.2 – Habitats management strategy .................................................................................................. 103 PI 2.4.3 – Habitats information ................................................................................................................... 107 PI 2.5.1 – Ecosystem outcome .................................................................................................................... 110 PI 2.5.2 – Ecosystem management strategy ............................................................................................... 112 PI 2.5.3 – Ecosystem information...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Imagine2014 8B3 02 Gehrke
    Loss Adjustment via Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) – Experiences and Challenges for Crop Insurance Thomas Gehrke, Regional Director Berlin, Resp. for International Affairs Loss Adjustment via UAS - Experiences and 20.10.2014 1 Challenges for Crop Insurance Structure 1. Introduction – Demo 2. Vereinigte Hagel – Market leader in Europe 3. Precision Agriculture – UAS 4. Crop insurance – Loss adjustment via UAS 5. Challenges and Conclusion Loss Adjustment via UAS - Experiences and Challenges for Crop Insurance 20.10.2014 2 Introduction – Demo Short film (not in pdf-file) Loss Adjustment via UAS - Experiences and Challenges for Crop Insurance 20.10.2014 3 Structure 1. Introduction – Demo 2. Vereinigte Hagel – Market leader in Europe 3. Precision Agriculture – UAS 4. Crop insurance – Loss adjustment via UAS 5. Challenges and Conclusion Loss Adjustment via UAS - Experiences and Challenges for Crop Insurance 20.10.2014 4 190 years of experience Secufarm® 1 Hail * Loss Adjustment via UAS - Experiences and Challenges for Crop Insurance 20.10.2014 5 2013-05-09, Hail – winter barley Loss Adjustment via UAS - Experiences and Challenges for Crop Insurance 20.10.2014 6 … and 4 weeks later Loss Adjustment via UAS - Experiences and Challenges for Crop Insurance 20.10.2014 7 Our Line of MPCI* Products PROFESSIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT is crucial part of modern agriculture. With Secufarm® products, farmers can decide individually which agricultural Secufarm® 6 crops they would like to insure against ® Fire & Drought which risks. Secufarm 4 Frost Secufarm® 3 Storm & Intense Rain Secufarm® 1 certain crop types are eligible Hail only for Secufarm 1 * MPCI: Multi Peril Crop Insurance Loss Adjustment via UAS - Experiences and Challenges for Crop Insurance 20.10.2014 8 Insurable Damages and their Causes Hail Storm Frost WEATHER RISKS are increasing further.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2021 Historical Winter Storm Event South-Central Texas
    Austin/San Antonio Weather Forecast Office WEATHER EVENT SUMMARY February 2021 Historical Winter Storm Event South-Central Texas 10-18 February 2021 A Snow-Covered Texas. GeoColor satellite image from the morning of 15 February, 2021. February 2021 South Central Texas Historical Winter Storm Event South-Central Texas Winter Storm Event February 10-18, 2021 Event Summary Overview An unprecedented and historical eight-day period of winter weather occurred between 10 February and 18 February across South-Central Texas. The first push of arctic air arrived in the area on 10 February, with the cold air dropping temperatures into the 20s and 30s across most of the area. The first of several frozen precipitation events occurred on the morning of 11 February where up to 0.75 inches of freezing rain accumulated on surfaces in Llano and Burnet Counties and 0.25-0.50 inches of freezing rain accumulated across the Austin metropolitan area with lesser amounts in portions of the Hill Country and New Braunfels area. For several days, the cold air mass remained in place across South-Central Texas, but a much colder air mass remained stationary across the Northern Plains. This record-breaking arctic air was able to finally move south into the region late on 14 February and into 15 February as a strong upper level low-pressure system moved through the Southern Plains. As this system moved through the region, snow began to fall and temperatures quickly fell into the single digits and teens. Most areas of South-Central Texas picked up at least an inch of snow with the highest amounts seen from Del Rio and Eagle Pass extending to the northeast into the Austin and San Antonio areas.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Girls Spring Season
    2021 GIRLS' SPRING PROGRAM SEASON INFORMATION PACKET LAST UPDATED: WEDNESDAY, APRIL 7TH @ 10:00PM 2020-21 RETURN TO PLAY - MAKING YOUR SAFETY A PRIORITY C R E A T E D B Y V C U N I T E D S T A F F U S I N G R E S T O R E I L L I N O I S A N D J V A / U S A V / A A U V O L L E Y B A L L G U I D E L I N E S 2021 SPRING TRYOUTS 2020-21 Seaon - Return To Play - Making Your Safety Our Priority GET READY FOR THE 2021 SPRING SEASON WHY TRYOUTS? Even though we anticipate that the Pre-TRryouEt Cl-iniTcs aRre a gYreatO way Uto prTepar eC for tLhe uIpNcomiIngC club season early sessions will be in-house leagues, or simply keep your skills sharp during the year. Each session will focus on a we need to accomplish two goals with range of skills and include drills to sharpen your overall game and build our tryouts. First, to create a competitive training environment with your confidence as you prepare for the spring club season. players of similar ability and objectives. Second, is to be in a position to quickly U17 U16 U15 move to teams/tournament play when SATURDAY, APRIL 17 SATURDAY, APRIL 17 SATURDAY, APRIL 17 Illinois determines it is safe to do so. 9A-11A OR 1P-3P 9A-11A OR 1P-3P 9A-11A OR 1P-3P COST: $30 COST: $30 COST: $30 AGE GROUPS USA Volleyball and AAU Volleyball have U14 U13 U12-U11 changed the birthdate cutoff starting SATURDAY, APRIL 17 SATURDAY, APRIL 17 SATURDAY, APRIL 17 with the upcoming season.
    [Show full text]
  • Climatic Information of Western Sahel F
    Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Clim. Past Discuss., 10, 3877–3900, 2014 www.clim-past-discuss.net/10/3877/2014/ doi:10.5194/cpd-10-3877-2014 CPD © Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0 License. 10, 3877–3900, 2014 This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal Climate of the Past (CP). Climatic information Please refer to the corresponding final paper in CP if available. of Western Sahel V. Millán and Climatic information of Western Sahel F. S. Rodrigo (1535–1793 AD) in original documentary sources Title Page Abstract Introduction V. Millán and F. S. Rodrigo Conclusions References Department of Applied Physics, University of Almería, Carretera de San Urbano, s/n, 04120, Almería, Spain Tables Figures Received: 11 September 2014 – Accepted: 12 September 2014 – Published: 26 September J I 2014 Correspondence to: F. S. Rodrigo ([email protected]) J I Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. Back Close Full Screen / Esc Printer-friendly Version Interactive Discussion 3877 Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Abstract CPD The Sahel is the semi-arid transition zone between arid Sahara and humid tropical Africa, extending approximately 10–20◦ N from Mauritania in the West to Sudan in the 10, 3877–3900, 2014 East. The African continent, one of the most vulnerable regions to climate change, 5 is subject to frequent droughts and famine. One climate challenge research is to iso- Climatic information late those aspects of climate variability that are natural from those that are related of Western Sahel to human influences.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Bird Feeding
    BirdNotes 1 Winter Bird Feeding birds at feeders in winter If you feed birds, you’re in good company. Birding is one of North America’s favorite pastimes. A 2006 report from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service estimates that about 55.5 mil- lion Americans provide food for wild birds. Chickadees Titmice Cardinals Sparrows Wood- Orioles Pigeons Nuthatches Finches Grosbeaks Blackbirds Jays peckers Tanagers Doves Sunflower ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ Safflower ◆ ◆ ◆ Corn ◆ ◆ ◆ Millet ◆ ◆ ◆ Milo ◆ ◆ Nyjer ◆ Suet ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ Preferred ◆ Readily Eaten Wintertime—and the Living’s counting birds at their feeders during selecting the best foods daunting. To Not Easy this winterlong survey. Great Back- attract a diversity of birds, provide a yard Bird Count participants provide variety of food types. But that doesn’t n much of North America, winter valuable data with a much shorter mean you need to purchase one of ev- Iis a difficult time for birds. Days time commitment—as little as fifteen erything on the shelf. are often windy and cold; nights are minutes in mid-February! long and even colder. Lush vegeta- Which Seed Types tion has withered or been consumed, Types of Bird Food Should I Provide? and most insects have died or become uring spring and summer, most dormant. Finding food can be espe- lack-oil sunflower seeds attract songbirds eat insects and spi- cially challenging for birds after a D Bthe greatest number of species. ders, which are highly nutritious, heavy snowfall. These seeds have a high meat-to- abundant, and for the most part, eas- shell ratio, they are nutritious and Setting up a backyard feeder makes ily captured.
    [Show full text]
  • Increasing Day-Length Induces Spring Flushing of Tropical Dry Forest Trees in the Absence of Rain
    Trees (2002) 16:445–456 DOI 10.1007/s00468-002-0185-3 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Guillermo Rivera · Stephen Elliott · Linda S. Caldas Guillermo Nicolossi · Vera T. R. Coradin Rolf Borchert Increasing day-length induces spring flushing of tropical dry forest trees in the absence of rain Received: 10 September 2001 / Accepted: 26 March 2002 / Published online: 20 July 2002 © Springer-Verlag 2002 Abstract In many conspecific trees of >50 species high- synthetic gain in tropical forests with a relatively short ly synchronous bud break with low inter-annual varia- growing season. tion was observed during the late dry season, around the spring equinox, in semideciduous tropical forests of Keywords Bud break · Phenology · Photoperiodic Argentina, Costa Rica, Java and Thailand and in tropical control · Tropical semideciduous forests savannas of Central Brazil. Bud break was 6 months out of phase between the northern and southern hemispheres and started about 1 month earlier in the subtropics than Introduction at lower latitudes. These observations indicate that “spring flushing”, i.e., synchronous bud break around the In cold-temperate forests, vegetative phenology of all spring equinox and weeks before the first rains of the broad-leaved trees is strongly synchronized by winter wet season, is induced by an increase in photoperiod of cold. In contrast, severe seasonal drought does not syn- 30 min or less. Spring flushing is common in semidecid- chronize vegetative phenology in tropical semideciduous uous forests characterized by a 4–6 month dry season forests with a dry season of 4–6 months and annual rain- and annual rainfall of 800–1,500 mm, but rare in neo- fall between 800 and 1,500 mm.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Jet Stream Trends Over the Northern Hemisphere
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 133: 2109–2115 (2007) Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/qj.171 Winter jet stream trends over the Northern Hemisphere Courtenay Stronga* and Robert E. Davisb a University of California, Irvine, USA b Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA ABSTRACT: Trends in the speed and probability of winter jet stream cores over the Northern Hemisphere were measured for 1958–2007, and related changes in the thermal structure of the troposphere were identified. Eddy-driven jet (EDJ) core speeds and probabilities increased over the midlatitudes (40–60 °N), with changes as large as 15% (speed) and 30% (probability). These increasing trends are collocated with increases in baroclinicity driven by a spatially heterogeneous pattern of height change consisting of large-scale warming with cooling centres embedded poleward of 60 °N. The cooling centres reduced high-latitude baroclinicity, making jet cores poleward of 60 °N less frequent and weaker. Over the west and central Pacific, subtropical jet stream (STJ) core probabilities remained relatively constant while core speeds increased by as much as 1.75 m/s decade−1 in association with Hadley cell intensification. The STJ shifted poleward over the east Pacific and Middle East, and an equatorward shift and intensification of the STJ were found over the Atlantic basin–contributing to an increased separation of the EDJ and STJ. Copyright 2007 Royal Meteorological Society KEY WORDS general circulation; climate change; global warming Received 25 March 2007; Revised 23 August 2007; Accepted 18 September 2007 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 1A.1 a Unique Cold-Season Supercell Produces an Ef1 ‘Snownado’
    1A.1 A UNIQUE COLD-SEASON SUPERCELL PRODUCES AN EF1 ‘SNOWNADO’ David Sills1*, Marie-Ève Giguère2, and John Henderson3 1Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), King City, ON 2Meteorological Service of Canada, ECCC, Montréal, QC 3Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Lexington, MA 1. INTRODUCTION1 2. STORM EVOLUTION On November 23, 2013, the ‘forecast problem du A weak low-pressure system moved southeast jour’ in southern Ontario, Canada, was the onset across the Great Lakes area during the morning of of significant snow squalls to the lee of the Great November 23rd. An associated secondary low Lakes following the passage of an Arctic cold front rapidly intensified while traversing the relatively (Fig. 1a). It was discovered a short time later warm (~7ºC) waters of Lake Huron’s Georgian however that, in addition to snow squalls, a Bay (Fig. 2). tornado had occurred that day. Low-level reflectivity images from the Environment An EF1 tornado track was identified at Charleville and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) radar in (Fig. 1b) via an on-site damage survey. It was Britt, ON, show the transformation from a cluster found to have a path length of at least 270 m (Fig. of showers on the west side of Georgian Bay at 1c), a path width of 75 m and an event time of 0900 UTC (Fig. 3a) to a well-developed vortex just 2015 UTC+. No fatalities or injuries resulted, but inland from the east side of the Bay at 1200 UTC farm structures (Fig. 1d) and trees were damaged. (Fig. 3b). Similar cyclone intensification over the Great Lakes was found by Angel and Isard (1997).
    [Show full text]
  • ESSENTIALS of METEOROLOGY (7Th Ed.) GLOSSARY
    ESSENTIALS OF METEOROLOGY (7th ed.) GLOSSARY Chapter 1 Aerosols Tiny suspended solid particles (dust, smoke, etc.) or liquid droplets that enter the atmosphere from either natural or human (anthropogenic) sources, such as the burning of fossil fuels. Sulfur-containing fossil fuels, such as coal, produce sulfate aerosols. Air density The ratio of the mass of a substance to the volume occupied by it. Air density is usually expressed as g/cm3 or kg/m3. Also See Density. Air pressure The pressure exerted by the mass of air above a given point, usually expressed in millibars (mb), inches of (atmospheric mercury (Hg) or in hectopascals (hPa). pressure) Atmosphere The envelope of gases that surround a planet and are held to it by the planet's gravitational attraction. The earth's atmosphere is mainly nitrogen and oxygen. Carbon dioxide (CO2) A colorless, odorless gas whose concentration is about 0.039 percent (390 ppm) in a volume of air near sea level. It is a selective absorber of infrared radiation and, consequently, it is important in the earth's atmospheric greenhouse effect. Solid CO2 is called dry ice. Climate The accumulation of daily and seasonal weather events over a long period of time. Front The transition zone between two distinct air masses. Hurricane A tropical cyclone having winds in excess of 64 knots (74 mi/hr). Ionosphere An electrified region of the upper atmosphere where fairly large concentrations of ions and free electrons exist. Lapse rate The rate at which an atmospheric variable (usually temperature) decreases with height. (See Environmental lapse rate.) Mesosphere The atmospheric layer between the stratosphere and the thermosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • How Do Heat Waves, Cold Waves, Droughts, Hail and Tornadoes Affect US Agriculture? Southern Great Plains (Better Known As the Dust Bowl)
    Research Papers Issue RP0271 How do heat waves, cold waves, December 2015 droughts, hail and tornadoes affect ECIP – Economic analysis of Climate US agriculture? Impacts and Policy Division By Emanuele Massetti SUMMARY We estimate the impact of extreme events on corn and Georgia Institute of Technology, soybeans yields, and on agricultural land values in the Eastern United CESIfo and States. We find the most harmful event is a severe drought but that cold Fondazione CMCC – Centro waves, heat waves, and storms all reduce both corn and soybean yields. Euro -Mediterraneo sui Over 80% of the damage from extreme events is caused by droughts and Cambiamenti Climatici cold waves with heat waves causing only 6% of the damage. Including FEEM – Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei extreme events in a panel model of weather alters how temperature emanuele.massetti@ affects yields, making cold temperature more harmful and hot pubpolicy.gatech.edu temperatures less harmful. Extreme events have no effect on farmland values probably because American farmers are buffered from extreme events by subsidized public crop insurance. Robert Mendelsohn Yale University [email protected] Keywords Climate change, agriculture, extreme events, heat waves, droughts. JEL codes: Q1, Q54 This report represents the Deliverable P152 developed within the framework of Work Package 7.1.3 of the GEMINA project, funded by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research and the Italian Ministry of Environment, Land and Sea. CMCC Research Papers 1. INTRODUCTION 02 There is a large literature that studies how climate and weather affect agricultural productivity using a wide range of methods: large agro-economic models that combine atmospheric science, plant science and agricultural economics (Adams et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Hail TYPICAL DAMAGE Information on Weather-Readyhail Landscapes Information on Weather-Ready Landscapes
    Hail TYPICAL DAMAGE Information on weather-readyHail landscapes Information on weather-ready landscapes WHAT IS IT? Type of Damage The frequency of hail in the U.S. is greatest stated here in the Great Plains due to a higher elevation The(closer frequency to freezing of level). hail inHail the forms U.S. when is greatest rain/ice in the Greatparticles Plains are carried due toin the a higher updrafts elevation and downdrafts (closerin thunderstorms to freezing colliding level). and freezing onto one Hailanother, forms while when growing rain/ice into larger particles pieces are of ice. carried in the updrafts and downdrafts in thunderstorms colliding and freezing onto one another, while growing into Type of Damage stated here larger pieces of ice. An average of 70% of hail reports in Nebraska occur from May-July (1955-2015). AnFrom average 2003-2012, there of were70% 7-11 of severe hail hail reportsdays (>1.0” hail in within Nebraska 25 miles of occur from May-Julyany point) per year(1955-2015). in Nebraska. From 2003-2012, there were 7-11 severe hail days (>1.0” hail within 25 miles of any point) Typical Damage: Impact from hailstones can per year in Nebraska. damage leaves, stems and fruit. The size of the hailstone, the amount of hail, time of year, and Number of days per year, within 25 miles of any point from 1986-2015: Number of days per year, within 25 miles of the wind speed plays a big role in the amount of any point from 1986-2015: Typical damageDamage: Impact to from plant hailstones material.
    [Show full text]
  • Hail Size and Melting Considerations in Thunderstorms
    Hail Size and Melting Considerations in Thunderstorms NWS Louisville, KY Hail Size and Melting Considerations Two primary factors associated with surface hail size: • Hail generation and initial size in storm • How much melting occurs as hail falls to ground Factors Contributing to Hail Generation and Size in Storm • Storm type: supercells produce larger hail than quasi-linear convective systems (QLCSs) and pulse storms; incipient cells (intense updraft) produce larger hail than after cells congeal into a mesoscale convective system (MCS) • Storm tilt: updraft/downdraft separation promotes hail growth • Updraft strength: increases hail generation and residence time in storm • Dry air aloft (~800-500): leads to evaporative cooling which promotes hail growth and size • Steep mid-level lapse rates: suggests presence of mid-level cool/dry air; promotes strong updraft • Echo tops: taller storms can tap colder air aloft (high refl above -20° C levels) and increase hail residence time in cloud • Cell/boundary mergers: promotes stronger updraft and better chance for hail formation • Values of WBZ height: hail is most favorable with height of 7-12 kft; less favorable if < 6 kft (air mass too cool, although small hail/graupel likely from low-top storms) and if >> 12 kft (melting) The size of hail at surface can’t be determined from looking at reflectivity values in a storm alone Factors Contributing to Hail Size at Surface • Large stones: better chance to reach ground than small stones which melt faster on their descent • Stones melt faster in wet environment than in dry (RH has strong effect); dry air in ~800-500 mb layer is very important to produce evaporative cooling and limit hail melting during descent (why stones are smaller or non-existent during MCSs due to saturated environment – and weaker updraft) • Hail falling within rain melts at a much greater rate than hail falling separate from rain (especially for small hail) • Vertical wind shear is critical in surface hail size to separate the updraft and downdraft and limit duration hail falls in heavy rain.
    [Show full text]