Existential Ethics: a New Start for Just War Theory? Cian O’Driscoll [email protected]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Existential Ethics: a New Start for Just War Theory? Cian O’Driscoll Cian.Odriscoll@Anu.Edu.Au Existential Ethics: A New Start for Just War Theory? Cian O’Driscoll [email protected] Introduction There is no shortage of issues for the coming generation of just war theorists to fret about. From the spectre of killer robots to the profusion of drones and the weaponization of cyber-space, not to mention the appearance of cyborg warriors on the battlefields of the near future, sci-fi nightmares abound.1 These developments certainly demand attention. I want to submit here, however, that there is another—arguably more profound, if also more mundane—challenge on the horizon for just war theorists. The challenge I am referring to bears on the purpose of just war theory as a form of practical ethics. Contemporary just war theory risks losing contact with the very practice it ostensibly regulates, warfare. Where once it was inter-twined with the martial codes of the fighting classes, there is little sign of this affinity today. Contemporary just war theory appears to be drifting toward an esoteric scholarly discourse propagated by philosophers, lawyers, and ethicists, with little regard for the boots-on-the-ground actualities of warfare. Absent is any concern for what John Keegan famously called ‘the face of battle’; in its place, intramural debates between so-called revisionists, Walzerians, and traditionalists.2 The worry therefore arises that just war theory is becoming a disconnected activity, one set apart from the experience of the very people whose lives it wagers. If this drift is not arrested, it will become all too easy for just war theorists to lose sight of what war actually entails, most notably, the violence it involves and the suffering it wreaks.3 More consequentially, it will make it even more difficult than it already is to persuade soldiers to engage in any serious way with the claims of just war theory. This, then, is the challenge I want to address in this essay. I will argue that it is disclosive of the need for a new starting-point for just war theorising—one that, informed by existentialist thought, is rooted, not in abstract universalisms, but in concrete human realities. 1 For an excellent survey of these issues: Caron E. Gentry and Amy E. Eckert (eds.), The Future of Just War: New Critical Essays (Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 2014). 2 John Keegan, The Face of Battle: A Study of Agincourt, Waterloo, and the Somme (London: Pimlico, 2004). 3 Michael Walzer is alert to this danger. Today’s just war scholarship, he has complained, is too often more focused on the ‘theory’ rather than the ‘war’ in ‘just war theory.’ Michael Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations—5th Edition (New York: Basic Books, 2015), pp. 335-46. What I mean by this will hopefully become clearer as the discussion proceeds. It will be divided into three main parts. Section One will examine how contemporary just war theory has become divorced from the practice it is designed to govern, warfare. Reflecting on the three modes of just war theorising that dominate the field today—the historical approach associated with James Turner Johnson; Michael Walzer’s efforts to re- capture the just war for political theory; and the revisionist school of thought advanced by Jeff McMahan and Cecile Fabre, among others—it will contend that just war theory can be characterised as a discourse detached from the lived experience of violent armed conflict. Building on the insight that there is much to be gained by relating how we think about the ethics of war to what we know about the experience of war, Section Two will survey the resources at our disposal to ground just war theory in the muddy, bloody realities of war. It will focus in particular on three bodies of thought that emphasise the situated character of knowledge: recent Critical Security Studies scholarship on vernacular discourses, feminist standpoint theory, and existentialism. This will open up a series of possible starting-points for thinking about what a more grounded just war theory might look like. Section Three will consider the third of these possibilities, existentialism, in more detail. It will do so by envisioning what a just war theory that starts, not with Saint Augustine, but with his fellow-Algerian, Albert Camus, would look like.4 Such an approach, I will argue, would bring to the fore the subjective, inward dimension of just war theorising that mainline accounts have foreclosed. This has the potential, the concluding remarks will suggest, to re-centre just war thinking as a ‘lived’ theory, and to thereby re-connect it to the experience of war.5 Recent reportage from war-zones indicates that this is badly needed.6 4 Albert Camus’ relationship with existentialism is vexed. Many people, including Camus himself, have argued that he should not be classified as an existentialist thinker. I will have more to say about this later. It will suffice for now, I hope, to indicate that I intend to treat him as part of what we might call the broad cultural movement of existentialism. 5 On the idea of ‘lived’ theory: Walter Kaufmann, ‘Introduction’, in Walter Kaufman (ed.), Existentialism: From Sartre to Dostoevsky (London: Plume, 1975), p. 51. On the idea of ‘connecting’ just war theory: Cian O’Driscoll et al, ‘How and Why to do Just War Theory’, Contemporary Political Theory XX: X (Firstview): XX-XXXX. 6 Foremost in my thoughts is the recently published Brereton Report on the conduct of the Australian Defence Forces in Afghanistan from 2005-2013. The Report exposes a litany of wrongdoing by Australian personnel, including 23 incidents in which non-combatants or persons hors-de-combat were unlawfully killed by or at the direction of Australian service personnel. Inspector-General of the Australian Defence Force, Report of Inquiry: Questions of Unlawful Conduct concerning the Special Operations Task Group in Afghanistan (Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2020). Available at: https://afghanistaninquiry.defence.gov.au. Accessed: 21 December, 2020. 2 1. Just War Theory Today ‘The rules of engagement harked back to my college classes on Saint Augustine and “just war” theory. I couldn’t control the justice of the declaration of war, but I could control the justice of its conduct within my tiny sphere of influence.’7 So wrote Nathaniel Fick, an officer in the U.S. Marine Corps, in his memoir account of the 2003 Iraq war. Fick’s readiness to engage just war theory may be attributed to the privilege of his Ivy League education and officer status. A more representative example, perhaps, is Tim O’Brien, whose memoir, If I Die in a Combat Zone, interrogates the idea of just war from the perspective of an infantry conscript in the Vietnam War.8 A key moment in the text arises when O’Brien’s closest friend in the military, Erik, confides his misgivings about the justness of the war to their company drill sergeant—who duly laughs at him and disparages him as a ‘pansy’ and a ‘coward’.9 Thereafter, O’Brien writes, he and Erik kept their own counsel. Just war theory was evidently not a suitable topic of discussion for young soldiers. These vignettes are noteworthy because they are two of the very few first- hand accounts of war by soldiers to directly reference just war theory.10 While most war memoirs are likely to include a general endorsement of restraint in war, as well as plenty of discussion about what it means to be a good soldier, they seldom acknowledge, let alone engage, just war theory. Simply put, it is not a part of their standard repertoire. This disinterest is mutual. Just as soldiers rarely talk about just war theory in their memoirs, so just war theorists seldom engage soldiers in any systematic fashion in their writings. A few honourable exceptions notwithstanding, just war theorists have paid remarkably little attention to what military personnel have written about the experience of war.11 This oversight is not unique to one or other rival school of just war theorising, but instead is common across them. 7 Nathaniel Fick, One Bullet Away: The Making of a Marine Officer (London: Phoenix, 2007), p. 182. 8 Tim O’Brien, If I Die in a Combat Zone (London: Fourth Estate, 2015), p. 53, 97-8. 9 O’Brien, If I Die, p. 43-4. 10 This claim is based on a survey reading of approximately sixty war memoirs from a variety of conflicts. 11 This observation has also been made by: Annika Bergman Rosamond and Annica Kronsell, ‘Cosmopolitanism and Individual Ethical Reflection—The Embodied Experiences of Swedish Veterans’, Critical Military Studies (Firstview). Exceptions include: Marcus Schulzke, Pursuing Moral Warfare: Ethics in American, British, and Israeli Counterinsurgency (Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 2019); Shannon French, The Code of the Warrior: Exploring Warrior Values Past and Present (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005); Nancy Sherman, Stoic Warriors: The Ancient Philosophy Behind the Military Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005); Pauline Shanks Kaurin, On Obedience (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2020); and Peter Lee, Reaper Force: Inside Britain’s Drone Wars (London: John Blake, 2018). Also: Valerie Morkevicius, ‘Looking Inward Together: Just War Thinking and Our Shared Moral Emotions’, Ethics & International Affairs 31:4 (2017): 441-51. 3 Discovery I have already alluded in the introduction to the internecine debates in which today’s just war theorists are embroiled. These debates hinge on the relative merits of the three rival approaches to just war theorising that dominate the field today. The first approach, usually labelled the historical approach, supposes that thinking ethically about war necessarily involves thinking historically about ethics.
Recommended publications
  • A Life Worth Living
    A LIFE WORTH LIVING A LIFE WORTH LIVING Albert Camus and the Quest for Meaning robert zaretsky the belknap press of harvard university press Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, En gland 2013 Copyright © 2013 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College all rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Zaretsky, Robert, 1955– A life worth living : Albert Camus and the quest for meaning / Robert Zaretsky. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978- 0- 674- 72476- 1 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Camus, Albert, 1913– 1960. 2. Conduct of life. I. Title. B2430.C354Z37 2013 194—dc23 2013010473 CONTENTS Prologue 1 1. Absurdity 11 2. Silence 59 3. Mea sure 92 4. Fidelity 117 5. Revolt 148 Epilogue 185 Notes 199 A c k n o w l e d g m e n t s 2 2 1 Index 223 A LIFE WORTH LIVING PROLOGUE “Even my death will be contested. And yet what I desire most today is a quiet death, which would bring peace to those whom I love.”1 Albert Camus’ prediction, written in the last decade of his life, has been borne out, though perhaps not his hope. Over the past several years, contests have simmered and burst over the French Algerian writer’s legacy. Shortly after becoming France’s president, Nicolas Sarkozy made a state visit to Algeria. The visit garnered more than the usual attention, in part because Sarkozy had come to offi ce with a reputation as a bluntly spoken conservative who saw no reason for France to apologize for its role as a colonial power.
    [Show full text]
  • A Philosophy of Rebellion: Anarchism in Literature and Film
    American University in Cairo AUC Knowledge Fountain Theses and Dissertations 6-1-2016 A philosophy of rebellion: Anarchism in literature and film Menna ElDawi Zein Follow this and additional works at: https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds Recommended Citation APA Citation ElDawi Zein, M. (2016).A philosophy of rebellion: Anarchism in literature and film [Master’s thesis, the American University in Cairo]. AUC Knowledge Fountain. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/288 MLA Citation ElDawi Zein, Menna. A philosophy of rebellion: Anarchism in literature and film. 2016. American University in Cairo, Master's thesis. AUC Knowledge Fountain. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/288 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by AUC Knowledge Fountain. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of AUC Knowledge Fountain. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The American University in Cairo School of Humanities and Social Sciences A Philosophy of Rebellion: Anarchism in Literature and Film A Thesis Submitted to The Department of English and Comparative Literature In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts Menna El Dawi Zein Under the supervision of Dr. William Melaney May 2016 The American University in Cairo A Philosophy of Rebellion: Anarchism in Literature and Film A Thesis Submitted by Menna El Dawi Zein To the Department of English and Comparative Literature May 2016 In partial fulfillment of the requirements for The degree of Master of Arts Has been approved by Dr. William Melaney Thesis Committee Advisor____________________________________________ Affiliation_________________________________________________________ Dr. Ferial Ghazoul Thesis Committee Reader____________________________________________ Affiliation_________________________________________________________ Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Care Ethics and Natural Law Theory: Toward an Institutional Political Theory of Caring Author(S): Daniel Engster Source: the Journal of Politics, Vol
    Care Ethics and Natural Law Theory: Toward an Institutional Political Theory of Caring Author(s): Daniel Engster Source: The Journal of Politics, Vol. 66, No. 1 (Feb., 2004), pp. 113-135 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of the Southern Political Science Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1046/j.1468-2508.2004.00144.x Accessed: 12-11-2016 19:50 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Southern Political Science Association, The University of Chicago Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Politics This content downloaded from 128.104.46.196 on Sat, 12 Nov 2016 19:50:57 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Care Ethics and Natural Law Theory: Toward an Institutional Political Theory of Caring Daniel Engster University of Texas at San Antonio Feminist care ethics have generally been considered too particular and situational to provide the basis for an institutional political theory. In recent years, however, a number of feminist authors have demonstrated care ethics’ applicability to general moral and political problems. Yet they have not yet developed an institutionally based caring political theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Ethics and Everyday Inequalities Author(S): Samantha Brennan Source: Hypatia, Vol
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ZENODO Hypatia, Inc. Feminist Ethics and Everyday Inequalities Author(s): Samantha Brennan Source: Hypatia, Vol. 24, No. 1, Oppression and Moral Agency: Essays in Honor of Claudia Card (Winter, 2009), pp. 141-159 Published by: Wiley on behalf of Hypatia, Inc. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20618125 Accessed: 03-10-2017 20:27 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Hypatia, Inc., Wiley are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Hypatia This content downloaded from 129.100.58.76 on Tue, 03 Oct 2017 20:27:16 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Feminist Ethics and Everyday Inequalities SAMANTHA BRENNAN How should feminist philosophers regard the inequalities that structure the lives of women? Some of these inequalities are trivial and others are not; together they form a framework of unequal treatment that shapes women's lives. This paper asks what priority we should give inequalities that affect women; it critically analyzes Claudia Card's view that feminists ought to give evils priority. Sometimes ending gender-based inequalities is the best route to eliminating gender-based evil.
    [Show full text]
  • An Artist in the Age of Terrorism: Camus and the Algerian Confl Ict( 1 )
    四天王寺大学紀要 第 49 号(2010年 3 月) An Artist in the Age of Terrorism: Camus and the Algerian Confl ict( 1 ) Keiji OKAZAKI Whatever our[writers’]personal frailties may be, the nobility of our calling will always be rooted in two commitments difficult to observe: refusal to lie about what we know and resistance to oppression.(Camus’s Nobel Prize address of December 10, 1957)(2 ) Keywords: Camus, Algiers, Terrorism, Revolt, The Just 1. Introduction If Camus had survived the automobile accident to witness Algeria’s independence and its aftermath, the collapse of the Soviet Union, or the proliferation of terrorism, culminating in the 9.11 attack in New York, would he have remained silent as he did in the late fi fties concerning the Algerian confl ict? This, we are confi rmed, is a question requiring an urgent answer which would present a possible key to our dealing with the twin contemporary problems – justice and terrorism. David Schalk refers to Camus as ‘the wrong model for American antiwar activists during the Vietnam era...(’ 3 ) Emily Apter argues that “The failure of Camus’s cosmopolitical hybrid – a vision of French Algeria...offers a kind of object lesson for the future of globalization theory or transnational identity-formation.”( 4 ) Accordingly, we are convinced that it would not be futile, rather very rewarding and signifi cant, to re-read and re-interpret his artistic achievements to have an overview of the present world crisis and gain a deeper insight into the reality of the contemporary political situation. We are living in the age of terrorism as was Camus half a century ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Camus' Dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky Sean Derek Illing Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected]
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2014 Between nihilism and transcendence : Albert Camus' dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky Sean Derek Illing Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Illing, Sean Derek, "Between nihilism and transcendence : Albert Camus' dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky" (2014). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1393. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1393 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. BETWEEN NIHILISM AND TRANSCENDENCE: ALBERT CAMUS’ DIALOGUE WITH NIETZSCHE AND DOSTOEVSKY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Political Science by Sean D. Illing B.A., Louisiana State University, 2007 M.A., University of West Florida, 2009 May 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation is the product of many supportive individuals. I am especially grateful for Dr. Cecil Eubank’s guidance. As a teacher, one can do no better than Professor Eubanks. Although his Socratic glare can be terrifying, there is always love and wisdom in his instruction. It is no exaggeration to say that this work would not exist without his support. At every step, he helped me along as I struggled to articulate my thoughts.
    [Show full text]
  • FAITH, REVOLT and ALBERT CAMUS' the Just Assassins
    Caroline Sheaffer-Jones* FAITH, REVOLT AND ALBERT CAMUS’ THE JUST ASSASSINS Keywords: Camus; faith; revolt; The Just Assassins; justice Abstract: In Albert Camus’ play The Just Assassins, religion and spirituality are of paramount importance, as can be seen especially in the interaction between the protagonist Kaliayev and the devoutly religious Grand Duchess, who expresses her steadfast view, for example, in the following words: “There is no love far from God” (289). However, is this religious conception of ‘love’ exactly what is at the heart of Camus’ play The Just Assassins? Indeed there is a different notion of spirituality, associated with revolt, which is more central to Camus’ writings and notably his major theoretical text The Rebel. What sort of spirituality is put forward and how might it be differentiated from religious convictions and the coming of the kingdom of God? In what sense is there a spirituality in The Just Assassins, particularly in the relentless revolt by Kaliayev and the members of the fraternity? Furthermore, is there not a fundamental position of ‘faith’ implied not simply in religion but also in the conception of knowledge itself? Jacques Derrida has discussed this question in “Faith and Knowledge,” in Acts of Religion, among other texts, where he describes a notion of ‘faith’, which precedes the opposition between religion and reason. In what way might there be, in Camus’ The Rebel and play The Just Assassins, a ‘faith’, which is distinguished from religious beliefs and which is necessarily linked to justice
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Virtual Issue of Hypatia
    Introduction: Hypatia Essays on the Place of Women in the Profession of Philosophy INTRODUCTION Hypatia Virtual Issue: “Hypatia Essays on the Place of Women in the Profession of Philosophy” Edited by Ann E. Cudd This virtual issue brings together essays published by Hypatia over a twenty year timespan that address the question of women’s place in the profession of philosophy. The issue includes essays about women in the history of philosophy, empirical studies of the numbers of women at various stages in careers in philosophy, analytical essays about why women, including specifically women of color, are not reaching parity with white men in the profession, and essays and reports about what women are doing to change the representation of women in philosophy. The issue highlights the efforts that women have made through the centuries and in the pages of this Journal to demand a place for women as philosophers. The first section, “Women in Historical Perspective,” includes three essays and one archival document. We begin with an essay by Eileen O’Neill, “Early Modern Women Philosophers and the History of Philosophy,” in which she recalls a 1990 session at the Eastern Division APA meeting where she listed some sixty women in the history of early modern philosophy, almost none of whom had even been heard of by the audience. O’Neill goes on to record how this changed somewhat in the intervening fifteen years. She analyzes some of the reasons for the exclusion of women from the canon, and how much work is still to be done to accord these historical women their proper places as philosophers.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Philosophy Comprehensive: Reading List
    Feminist Philosophy Comprehensive: Reading List The main part of this list comprises readings that correspond to each of the five sections of the comprehensive exam. The Reference Books at the end of the list provide more background, but they are entirely optional. 1. Core Concepts a. Feminism Mill, J. S. “The Subjection of Women.” In Feminist Theory: A Philosophical Anthology. A. Cudd and R. Andreasen, eds. Malden, MA: Blackwell 2005: 17-26. de Beauvoir, S. “Introduction from The Second Sex.” In Cudd and Andreasen: 27-36. Truth, S. “Ar’n’t I a Woman?” In Theorizing Feminisms: A Reader. Ed. E. Hackett and S. Haslanger. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2006. 113. Tuana, N. ‘What is Feminist Philosophy?’ Philosophy in Multiple Voices. Ed. G. Yancy. Lanham MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2007. Sherwin, S. “Understanding Feminism.” In her No Longer Patient: Feminist Ethics & Health Care. Philadelphia, PA: Temple, 1992. 13-34. b. Sex and Gender Butler, J. “Introduction: Acting in Concert.” In Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge, 2004. pp. 1-16. Fausto-Sterling, A. “The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female Are Not Enough,” The Sciences 33(2), 1993: 20-24. Garry, A. “Intersectionality, Metaphors, and the Multiplicity of Gender,” Hypatia, 26(4), 2011: 826–850. Haslanger, S. “Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them To Be?” Noûs 34(1), 2000: 31-55. Heyes, C. J. “Changing Race, Changing Sex: The Ethics of Self-Transformation,” Journal of Social Philosophy 37(2), 2006: 266-282. Jenkins, K. “Amelioration and Inclusion: Gender Identity and the Concept of Woman,” Ethics 126 (2016): 394–421.
    [Show full text]
  • Briana Toole * [email protected]
    Briana Toole * [email protected] Curriculum Vitae (January 2021) 8 http://www.brianatoole.com/ AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION Epistemology, Philosophy of Race and Gender AREAS OF COMPETENCE Normative and Metaethics EMPLOYMENT 2019 – present Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Claremont McKenna College 2018 – 2019 Post-Doctoral Research Fellow, Baruch College-CUNY Inaugural Weissman School of Arts and Sciences Fellow EDUCATION 2013 – 2018 PhD in Philosophy, University of Texas at Austin 2017 – 2018 Visiting Scholar, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Funded by the Diversity Predoctoral Fellowship 2010 – 2011 Master of Arts in Philosophy, University of Sheffield (with distinction) 2006 – 2010 Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy, Florida State University (Magna Cum Laude) PUBLICATIONS Forthcoming. “Corrupt the Youth”, with Alex Hargroder, in Claire Katz (ed.), Philosophy Camps: Everything You Wanted to Know about Starting, Organizing, and Running a Philosophy Camp. Rowman and Littlefield. Forthcoming. “Demarginalizing Standpoint Epistemology”, Episteme. Forthcoming. “What Lies Beneath: The Epistemic Roots of White Supremacy” in Elizabeth Edenberg and Michael Hannon (eds.), Politics & Truth: New Perspectives in Political Epistemology. Oxford University Press. Forthcoming. “Believing is Seeing: Feminist Philosophy, Knowledge, and Perception” in Elly Vintiadis (ed.), Philosophy by Women: 22 Philosophers Reflect on Philosophy and Its Value. Routledge. 2019 “From Standpoint Epistemology to Epistemic Oppression”, Hypatia, 34(4), 598-618. 2019 “Masculine Foes,
    [Show full text]
  • “For a World Without Oppressors:” U.S. Anarchism from the Palmer
    “For a World Without Oppressors:” U.S. Anarchism from the Palmer Raids to the Sixties by Andrew Cornell A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Social and Cultural Analysis Program in American Studies New York University January, 2011 _______________________ Andrew Ross © Andrew Cornell All Rights Reserved, 2011 “I am undertaking something which may turn out to be a resume of the English speaking anarchist movement in America and I am appalled at the little I know about it after my twenty years of association with anarchists both here and abroad.” -W.S. Van Valkenburgh, Letter to Agnes Inglis, 1932 “The difficulty in finding perspective is related to the general American lack of a historical consciousness…Many young white activists still act as though they have nothing to learn from their sisters and brothers who struggled before them.” -George Lakey, Strategy for a Living Revolution, 1971 “From the start, anarchism was an open political philosophy, always transforming itself in theory and practice…Yet when people are introduced to anarchism today, that openness, combined with a cultural propensity to forget the past, can make it seem a recent invention—without an elastic tradition, filled with debates, lessons, and experiments to build on.” -Cindy Milstein, Anarchism and Its Aspirations, 2010 “Librarians have an ‘academic’ sense, and can’t bare to throw anything away! Even things they don’t approve of. They acquire a historic sense. At the time a hand-bill may be very ‘bad’! But the following day it becomes ‘historic.’” -Agnes Inglis, Letter to Highlander Folk School, 1944 “To keep on repeating the same attempts without an intelligent appraisal of all the numerous failures in the past is not to uphold the right to experiment, but to insist upon one’s right to escape the hard facts of social struggle into the world of wishful belief.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Anti-Anarchism: the Origins of Ideological Deportation and the Suppression of Expression
    Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies Volume 19 Issue 1 Article 7 Winter 2012 Global Anti-Anarchism: The Origins of ideological Deportation and the Suppression of Expression Julia Rose Kraut New York University Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijgls Part of the Immigration Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Kraut, Julia Rose (2012) "Global Anti-Anarchism: The Origins of ideological Deportation and the Suppression of Expression," Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies: Vol. 19 : Iss. 1 , Article 7. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijgls/vol19/iss1/7 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Global Anti-Anarchism: The Origins of Ideological Deportation and the Suppression of Expression JULIA ROSE KRAUT* ABSTRACT On September 6, 1901, a self-proclaimed anarchist named Leon Czolgosz fatally shot President William McKinley at the Pan-American Exposition in Buffalo, New York. This paper places the suppression of anarchists and the exclusion and deportation of foreigners in the aftermath of the "shot that shocked the world" within the context of international anti-anarchist efforts, and reveals that President McKinley's assassination successfully pulled the United States into an existing global conversation over how to combat anarchist violence. This paper argues that these anti-anarchistrestrictions and the suppression of expression led to the emergence of a "free speech consciousness" among anarchists,and others, and to the formation of the Free Speech League, predecessor of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
    [Show full text]