Tidings Issue 14 Summer 2009
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A27 Arundel Bypass Environmental Assessment Report
A27 Arundel Bypass Environmental Assessment Report Chapter 7 – Landscape and Visual 30 August 2019 Environmental Assessment Report Chapter 7 – Landscape and Visual A27 Arundel Bypass – PCF Stage 2 Further Consultation Table of Contents 7 Landscape and Visual 7-1 7.1 Introduction 7-1 7.2 Legislative and policy framework 7-2 7.3 Assessment methodology 7-9 7.4 Assessment assumptions and limitations 7-19 7.5 Study Area 7-23 7.6 Baseline conditions 7-25 7.7 Potential impacts 7-64 7.8 Design, mitigation and enhancement measures 7-67 7.9 Assessment of likely significant effects 7-70 LIST OF TABLES Table 7-1 - Legislation, regulatory and policy framework applicable to the landscape and visual assessment 7-2 Table 7-2 - Landscape sensitivity and typical examples 7-11 Table 7-3 - Visual sensitivity and typical descriptors 7-12 Table 7-4 - Magnitude of impact and typical descriptors for landscape receptors 7-13 Table 7-5 - Magnitude of impact and typical descriptors for visual receptors 7-14 Table 7-6 - Arriving at the significance of effect categories for landscape and visual receptors 7-15 Table 7-7 - Significance of effect 7-16 Table 7-8 - Assessment assumptions and limitations for landscape and visual assessment 7- 19 Table 7-9 - Visual Receptors and their representative viewpoints 7-48 Table 7-10 - Sensitivity of identified receptors for landscape and visual assessment 7-61 Table 7-11 - Construction phase potential impacts for landscape and visual receptors 7-65 Table 7-12 - Operational phase potential impacts for landscape and visual receptors -
Govia Thameslink Railway Penalty Fares Scheme
GOVIA THAMESLINK RAILWAY PENALTY FARES SCHEME CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2 PENALTY FARES TRAINS 3 PENALTY FARES STATIONS 4 COMPULSORY TICKETS AREAS 5 TICKET FACILITIES 6 PUBLICITY AND WARNING NOTICES 7 SELECTION AND TRAINING OF AUTHORISED COLLECTORS 8 WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORISED COLLECTORS 9 TICKET FACILITIES AND DISPLAY OF WARNING NOTICES 10 SELLING TICKETS ON BOARD TRAINS 11 ARRANGEMENTS WITH OTHER OPERATORS 12 APPEALS Govia Thameslink Railway 2 1 July 2015 Penalty Fares Scheme 1 Introduction 1.1 We, Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR) Ltd, give notice, under rule 3.2 of the Penalty Fares Rules 2002 that we wish to continue to operate a Penalty Fares Scheme across the Thameslink, Southern and Great Northern (TSGN) franchise, with effect from 26th July 2015. This document describes our Penalty Fares Scheme for the purposes of rule 3.2 b. 1.2 We have decided to introduce a Penalty Fares Scheme because the previous operator of the railway passenger services comprised of the Thameslink Great Northern franchise, First Capital Connect and Southern Railways, operated a Penalty Fares Scheme in such franchise area and the experience has proved that it is an efficient means to deter ticketless travel. In addition, once some Southeastern routes and stations are integrated into the TSGN franchise from 14 December 2014 and once the entire current Southern franchise is integrated into the TSGN franchise on 26th July 2015, it is important that there is consistency across all franchise areas (as Southeastern and Southern both also operate a Penalty Fares Scheme); so as to avoid causing confusion for our passengers. This scheme will now include all stations under schemes previously operated by Govia Thameslink Railway Limited and Southern Railway Limited. -
A27 Arundel Bypass Environmental Assessment Report
A27 Arundel Bypass Environmental Assessment Report Appendix 1-1: South Downs National Park Special Quality Assessment 30 August 2019 SDNP Special Quality Assessment A27 Arundel Bypass – PCF Stage 2 Further Consultation Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 Purpose of the report 1-1 1.2 Overview of the project 1-1 1.3 SDNP special qualities 1-2 1.4 Structure of the SDNP special qualities assessment report 1-3 1.5 Legislative and policy framework 1-4 1.6 Sub-regional and local planning policy 1-8 LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1 - SDNP special qualities assessment structure 1-3 2 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY 2-1 2.1 Introduction 2-1 2.2 Assessment process 2-1 2.3 Potential impacts 2-3 2.4 Guidance 2-4 2.5 Assessment results 2-12 2.6 Assumptions and limitations 2-13 LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1 - Types of impact associated with each special quality 2-4 Table 2-2 - Alignment between DMRB and the potential impacts identified 2-6 Table 2-3 - General assumptions and limitations 2-13 August 2019 SDNP Special Quality Assessment A27 Arundel Bypass – PCF Stage 2 Further Consultation 3 SPECIAL QUALITY 1: DIVERSE, INSPIRATIONAL LANDSCAPES AND BREATHTAKING VIEWS 3-1 3.1 Introduction 3-1 3.2 Assessment methodology 3-2 3.3 Assessment assumptions and limitations 3-5 3.4 Study Area 3-5 3.5 Baseline conditions 3-5 3.6 Scoping 3-5 3.7 Design, mitigation and enhancement 3-6 3.8 Assessment of potential impacts 3-9 3.9 Summary of landscape character, visual amenity and experience 3-18 LIST OF TABLES Table 3-1 - Assessment assumptions and limitations for SQ1 3-5 Table 3-2 -
Arun District Council Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment
Arun District Council Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment Stage 7 Site Assessment Final Report December 2009 Arun District Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment: Stage 7 Site Assessment Final Report CONTENTS 1. Introduction............................................................................................................ 2 2. Study methodology............................................................................................... 5 3. Market assessment ............................................................................................ 11 4. Sites with planning permission for housing...................................................... 23 5. Site specific sources within settlements........................................................... 25 6. Site specific sources outside settlements .................................................... 28 7. Conclusions ……………………………………………………………………….42 APPENDICES Appendix 1 Site assessment criteria Appendix 2 Sites with planning permission Appendix 3 Rejected sites within settlements Appendix 4 Sites with potential within settlements Appendix 5 Site yield summary table Appendix 6 Rejected sites outside settlements Appendix 7 Sites with planning permission outside settlements Appendix 8 Sites with future potential outside settlements Appendix 9 Sites with future potential outside settlements where availability is uncertain Appendix 10 Settlement maps and all sites assessed Appendix 11 Landscape appraisal December 2009 1 Arun District Strategic Housing Land -
Adapting to the Future
Adapting to the future Govia Thameslink Railway Sustainability Report 2018 About us The Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR) franchise was established to modernise the network and bring change, introducing more frequent and dependable services into and beyond London. Passenger numbers across these geographies have continued to rise faster than other areas of the country and the efforts of our teams are helping to create new journey opportunities, whilst delivering state of the art trains, better infrastructure, improving stations and supporting local communities. King’s Lynn Peterborough Bedford Milton Keynes Central London Wimbledon Sutton Tonbridge Horsham Ashford Southampton Uckfield International Brighton Portsmouth Bognor Eastbourne Regis Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR) Sustainability Report 2018 In this report Follow us on social media: @gatwickexpress 2 Chief Executive Officer’s message 4 Finance @GNRailUK 5 Better teams @southernrailUK 6 Happier customers @TLRailUK 8 Stronger communities For more information, 10 Cleaner environment visit our websites: 12 Smarter technology www.gatwickexpress.com 13 Key data www.greatnorthernrail.com Our reporting structure www.southernrailway.com We are committed to operating our buses in www.thameslinkrailway.com a way which helps to put our services at the heart of the communities they serve. This report is split into six sections: Finance Better teams Happier To work together To perform all job customers with suppliers to roles and tasks To gain more happy jointly deliver the competently to customers and reward best possible service allow further growth. colleagues for receiving p4 p5 positive feedback. p6 Stronger Cleaner Smarter communities environment technology To support colleagues To improve air quality To implement new with fundraising events and encourage fuel market leading which support the local efficiency at all technology and adapt community. -
Ford Neighbourhood Plan: Preliminary Landscape and Visual Appraisal
Ford Neighbourhood Plan: Preliminary Landscape and Visual Appraisal March 2016 Ford Neighbourhood Plan: Preliminary Landscape and Visual Appraisal Project Ref: 23885/A5 Status: Draft Issue/ Rev: - Date: March 2016 Prepared by: CH Checked by: LT Authorised by: LT Barton Willmore LLP 7 Soho Square London W1D 3QB Tel: 020 7446 6888 Ref: 23885/A5 Fax: 020 7446 6889 Date: March 2016 Email: [email protected] Status: Draft COPYRIGHT The contents of this document must not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part without the written consent of Barton Willmore LLP. All Barton Willmore stationery is produced using recycled or FSC paper and vegetation oil based inks. CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Methodology ................................................................................................................. 3 3.0 Site Context .................................................................................................................. 5 4.0 Site Appraisal ............................................................................................................... 20 5.0 Development Principles for Urban Development ................................................................ 23 6.0 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 27 ILLUSTRATIVE MATERIAL Figure 1: Site Context Plan (1:10,000 @A1) Figure 2: Topographical -
Adoption Arun Local Plan 2011-2031 (July 2018)
16. Extract – Arun District Local plan 2011 - 2031 Adoption Arun Local Plan 2011-2031 (July 2018) Adoption Arun Local Plan 2011-2031 (July 2018) Arun District Council Preface Adoption Arun Local Plan 2011-2031 (July 2018) Arun District Council i Preface Arun Local Plan 2011 to 2031 The Arun Local Plan covers the period 2011-2031 for the area of Arun District (excluding the area covered by the South Downs National Park Authority) and was adopted on the 18th of July 2018. ii Arun District Council Adoption Arun Local Plan 2011-2031 (July 2018) Contents Overview / Spatial Portrait / Vision & Objectives / Key Diagram 1 Foreword 10 2 Overview 12 3 Spatial Portrait 20 4 Vision & Objectives 31 5 The Key Diagram 36 Sustainable Place 6 Sustainable Development 40 6.1 Sustainable Development 40 6.2 Strategic Approach 41 7 Settlement Structure & Green Infrastructure 45 7.1 Settlement structure, Green Infrastructure and landscape 45 7.2 The Built-up Area Boundary and the countryside 46 7.3 Green Infrastructure 49 7.4 Settlement Structure and Gaps Between Settlements 53 7.5 Landscape 55 Prosperous Place 8 Employment & Enterprise 60 8.1 Employment & Enterprise 60 8.2 Coast to Capital LEP 62 8.3 Coastal West Sussex Partnership 63 8.4 Strategic Economic Growth 64 8.5 Economic Growth Areas 66 8.6 Strategic Employment Land Allocations 71 8.7 Employment Land: Development Management 75 8.8 Enterprise Bognor Regis 81 8.9 Employment and Skills 85 8.10 Telecommunications 87 8.11 Planning for uncertainty and flexibility 89 Adoption Arun Local Plan 2011-2031 (July -
West Sussex Connectivity Modular Strategic Study Spring 2020
West Sussex Connectivity Study Spring 2020 West Sussex Connectivity Modular Strategic Study Spring 2020 Continuous Modular Strategic Planning 1 West Sussex Connectivity Study Spring 2020 Contents Foreword Welcome to the West Sussex Connectivity Modular Strategic The System Operator South team is also undertaking the Study, the first small, local study in Kent and Sussex, as part of following studies: Foreword 2 the Continuous Modular Strategic Planning (CMSP) process. • Solent 1. Executive Summary 4 This study follows the Sussex Route Utilisation Strategy (RUS) • West of England Line (2009), London and South East RUS (2011) and Sussex Area • Southern Regional Freight 2. Overlapping Interfaces 9 Route Study (2015), which looked at the high level demands of • London Freight Strategy the rail network. • Depots & Stabling 3. Transport Background 11 The Sussex Area Route Study concentrated mainly on the • First & Last Mile Brighton Main Line (between London and Brighton) although • South London and Thameslink Service Improvement 4. Economic and Social Context 20 issues were identified on the West Coastway and Arun Valley • London Rail Strategy lines. This Study is intended to focus on the requirements of • North and East Kent Connectivity 5. Strategic Questions and Answers 26 stakeholders and the rail industry over the smaller area for the • South of England Connectivity. next 20-30 years. 7. Conclusion 52 8. References 53 Figure 1: Diagram of the Study area Acknowledgements We would like to thank the following for the photographs and illustrations in this document: ARUN VALLEY LINE Network Rail (Alex Hellier, Sam Cullen, George Beale-Pratt, Simon Hulse and Paul Best) and Transport for the South East. -
Arundel to Ford Station Cycle and Walking Route
ARUNDEL TO FORD STATION CYCLE AND WALKING ROUTE Making Cycling and Walking Safer February 2021 A report by Arundel Cycling and Walking Group Contents 1 Forewords 2 Executive Summary 3 Introduction and context 4 This route is a residents’ priority that will also connect the region 5 Opportunity being lost because of gaps in local governance and process 6 Economic case and funding 7 Conclusion and recommendation Appendices Abbreviations ATC – Arundel Town Council LCWIP – Local Cycling and Walking ADC – Arun District Council Infrastructure Plan CIL – Community Infrastructure Levy S106 – Funding from developers DfT – Department for Transport SDNP – South Downs National Park GVA – Gross Value Added WSCC – West Sussex County Council HE – Highways England For more information please contact Arundel Cycling and Walking Group: Andy Batty [email protected] Photos by Charlie Waring 1 Foreword from Message from Andrew Griffith the Mayor of Arundel MP for Arundel & South Downs Securing a safe route between Arundel and Ford station for cyclists I welcome this excellent report and commend the initiative of all of and pedestrians is a high priority for Arundel residents. those in the local community who have contributed to its production. Towns such as Arundel in West Sussex have always - and will continue Currently the road is dangerous for cyclists and for walkers. As a to - thrive on the back of healthy civic involvement of which this is result, there are parents who chauffeur their children to Ford Station an example. 190 days a year, amounting to 760 journey of less than 2 miles. This is the type of car journey that the government want to see replaced by The proposal for a cycle and walking path from Arundel to Ford has walking or cycling. -
Making Rail Accessible
Making rail accessible Making rail accessible Contents 3 Introduction 5 Assistance: What is available and how to get it 5 Before you travel 9 At our station 12 Tickets 16 On our trains 18 If things don’t go as planned 20 Where to get more information and how to get it in touch 21 Contact Details Page 2 Making rail accessible Introduction Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR) is the parent company for the following train companies. GTR runs the largest rail network in the country, operating services across the south-east of England. Southern Extensive network from London to stations across Sussex and Surrey, the south coast and suburban ‘metro’ services across south London and to Milton Keynes via Watford Junction. Gatwick Express Direct services between London Victoria and Gatwick Airport (and some services towards Brighton). Thameslink Network of services linking many stations north of London such as Bedford, Cambridge, Peterborough, St Albans with destinations south of the River Thames via St Pancras International such as London Bridge, East Croydon, Sutton, Gatwick Airport, Brighton, Horsham and Rainham (Kent). Great Northern Services from London King’s Cross to Peterborough, King’s Lynn via Cambridge and suburban services from Moorgate towards Hertford North, Welwyn Garden City and Stevenage. Detailed timetable information for all of our services is available from National Rail Enquiries. We want all our customers to use our network with complete confidence and know that help is available at all stages of their journey. This leaflet, ‘Making Rail Accessible’ provides you with a practical guide to travelling on our services, explaining how we assist older and disabled customers and the standards of service you can reasonably expect. -
Core Strategy Options For
Agenda Item No. 9 ARUN LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 2006-2026 CORE STRATEGY OPTIONS FOR GROWTH CONSULTATION DOCUMENT DRAFT – DECEMBER 2008 Agenda Item No. 9 CONTENTS PAGE Part A – Introduction 1 Core Strategy Background Studies 2 Forthcoming Studies 3 Context for Local Development Framework 3 Part B – Identifying Issues and Opportunities 5 National Context 5 Regional and Sub-Regional Context 5 Local Context 7 A Spatial Portrait of Arun 8 Planning Context and Regeneration 12 Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats 15 Identifying Issues, Challenges and Opportunities 19 Part C – Vision and Objectives 24 Core Strategy Vision 24 Proposed Strategic Objectives 28 Part D – Spatial Options for Growth 33 Meeting Future Development Requirements 33 South East Plan Requirements 36 Meeting the Housing Requirements 36 Completions and Existing Commitments 37 Brownfield Sites 37 Greenfield Housing Requirement 38 Spatial Strategy to 2026 38 Spatial Option 1: Sustainable Urban Extensions 39 Spatial Option 2: New Settlement at Ford 43 Spatial Option 3: Expansion of Inland Villages 46 Part E – Summary and Questions 50 APPENDICES Appendix 1 Key South East Plan Policies Relevant to the Arun LDF Core Strategy 51 Appendix 2 Arun Sustainable Community Strategy Priorities Analysis - 54 of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities And Threats Appendix 3 Initial Assessment of Possible Development Locations 68 Appendix 4 Detailed Comparative Assessment of Development Locations 116 PART A - INTRODUCTION 1.1. This Options for Growth document sets out three alternative strategic growth strategies for Arun District for stakeholder and public comment. 1.2. This consultation is a key step towards producing a Core Strategy, a statutory planning document which will form a key part of the Arun Local Development Framework (LDF). -
Ford Neighbourhood Development Plan Survey Results November 2014
Ford Neighbourhood Development Plan Survey Results November 2014 Ford Neighbourhood Development Plan Survey Q1 Which of the following are most important to you? Answered: 128 Skipped: 1 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Parks Conservat Shops, Footpaths Schools Clubs Roads & and Open ion and services & cycle and and parking Spaces Heritage and pubs routes education activitie facilitie features facili... s s Important Less Important Not Important Important Less Important Not Important Total Parks and Open Spaces 93.55% 5.65% 0.81% 116 7 1 124 Conservation and Heritage features 72.88% 20.34% 6.78% 86 24 8 118 Shops, services and pubs 57.14% 34.45% 8.40% 68 41 10 119 Footpaths & cycle routes 76.47% 20.17% 3.36% 91 24 4 119 Schools and education facilities 43.10% 31.03% 25.86% 50 36 30 116 Clubs and activities 21.55% 50.00% 28.45% 25 58 33 116 Roads & parking facilities 60.00% 28.33% 11.67% 72 34 14 120 # Other (please specify) Date 1 Footpaths through the fields 11/30/2014 4:05 PM 2 Traffic - speed restrictions 11/30/2014 2:45 PM 3 Linked open spaces for walking and to cycle 11/28/2014 9:32 AM 4 High speed internet connectivity (Fibre to the premises) 11/24/2014 8:54 AM 5 Medical centre 11/23/2014 9:48 AM 6 Agriculture and wild areas. 11/23/2014 3:23 AM 7 Wildlife 11/20/2014 6:39 AM 1 / 41 Ford Neighbourhood Development Plan Survey 8 Services includes GP surgeries which are important, pubs are not, so why group them together? 11/17/2014 9:46 AM 9 More affordable housing without spoiling the environment 11/17/2014 9:06 AM 2 / 41 Ford Neighbourhood Development