DOCSLIB.ORG

A27 Arundel Bypass Environmental Assessment Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A27 Arundel Bypass Environmental Assessment Report Chapter 7 – Landscape and Visual 30 August 2019 Environmental Assessment Report Chapter 7 – Landscape and Visual A27 Arundel Bypass – PCF Stage 2 Further Consultation Table of Contents 7 Landscape and Visual 7-1 7.1 Introduction 7-1 7.2 Legislative and policy framework 7-2 7.3 Assessment methodology 7-9 7.4 Assessment assumptions and limitations 7-19 7.5 Study Area 7-23 7.6 Baseline conditions 7-25 7.7 Potential impacts 7-64 7.8 Design, mitigation and enhancement measures 7-67 7.9 Assessment of likely significant effects 7-70 LIST OF TABLES Table 7-1 - Legislation, regulatory and policy framework applicable to the landscape and visual assessment 7-2 Table 7-2 - Landscape sensitivity and typical examples 7-11 Table 7-3 - Visual sensitivity and typical descriptors 7-12 Table 7-4 - Magnitude of impact and typical descriptors for landscape receptors 7-13 Table 7-5 - Magnitude of impact and typical descriptors for visual receptors 7-14 Table 7-6 - Arriving at the significance of effect categories for landscape and visual receptors 7-15 Table 7-7 - Significance of effect 7-16 Table 7-8 - Assessment assumptions and limitations for landscape and visual assessment 7- 19 Table 7-9 - Visual Receptors and their representative viewpoints 7-48 Table 7-10 - Sensitivity of identified receptors for landscape and visual assessment 7-61 Table 7-11 - Construction phase potential impacts for landscape and visual receptors 7-65 Table 7-12 - Operational phase potential impacts for landscape and visual receptors 7-67 Table 7-13 - Likely landscape effects: construction phase 7-80 Table 7-14 - Likely landscape effects: operational phase, Year 1 and Year 15 7-82 Table 7-15 - Construction phase likely effects on viewpoint receptors from Option 1V5 7-85 Table 7-16 - Operational phase likely effects on viewpoint viewpoints from Option 1V5 7-89 Table 7-17 - Construction phase likely effects on viewpoint receptors from Option 1V9 7-92 Table 7-18 - Operational phase likely effects on viewpoint receptors from Option 1V9 7-96 Table 7-19 - Construction phase likely effects on viewpoint receptors from Option 3V1 7-99 Table 7-20 - Operational phase likely effects on viewpoint receptors from Option 3V1 7-104 August 2019 Environmental Assessment Report Chapter 7 – Landscape and Visual A27 Arundel Bypass – PCF Stage 2 Further Consultation Table 7-21 - Construction phase likely effects on viewpoint receptors from Option 4/5AV1 7- 107 Table 7-22 - Operational phase likely effects on viewpoint receptors from Option 4/5AV1 7- 113 Table 7-23 - Construction phase likely effects on viewpoint receptors from Option 4/5AV2 117 Table 7-24 - Operational phase likely effects on viewpoint receptors as a result of Option 4/5AV2 7-121 Table 7-25 - Construction phase likely effects for viewpoint receptors from Option 5BV1 7- 125 Table 7-26 - Operational phase likely effects on viewpoint receptors as a result of Option 5BV1 7-130 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 7-1 – Landscape Context Figure 7-2 – Landscape Character Areas Figure 7-3 – ZVI – Option 1V5 Figure 7-4 – ZVI – Option 1V9 Figure 7-5 – ZVI – Option 3V1 Figure 7-6 – ZVI – Option 4/5AV1 Figure 7-7 – ZVI – Option 4/5AV2 Figure 7-8 – ZVI – Option 5BV1 Figure 7-9 – Representative Viewpoints Location Plan 1 of 2 Figure 7-10 – Representative Viewpoints Location Plan 2 of 2 Figures 7-11 to 7-69 – Representative Viewpoint Photographs LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix 7-1 – Landscape effects schedule Appendix 7-2 – Visual effects schedule Appendix 7-3 – Arboriculture Report August 2019 Environmental Assessment Report Chapter 7 – Landscape and Visual A27 Arundel Bypass – PCF Stage 2 Further Consultation Acronyms ACRONYMS DEFINITION GLVIA Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment NCA National Character Area LCA Landscape Character Area ZVI Zone of Visual Influence AOD Above Ordnance Datum August 2019 Environmental Assessment Report Chapter 7 – Landscape and Visual A27 Arundel Bypass – PCF Stage 2 Further Consultation Glossary TERM DEFINITION Guidelines for Landscape Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment and Visual Impact (LVIA) is a tool used to identify and assess Assessment (GLVIA) the significance of and the effects of change resulting from development on both the landscape as an environmental resource in its own right and on people’s views and visual amenity. National Character Area Broad landscape areas exhibiting unique (NCA) combinations of landscape, biodiversity, geodiversity, history, cultural and economic activity. England is divided into 159 NCAs, as defined by Natural England Landscape Character Areas of distinct landscape character, Area (LCA) usually at the local scale. Zone of Visual Influence The extent of the area over which the (ZVI) Scheme may theoretically be visible. Light imaging, Detection Digital surface modelling software to help and Ranging (LiDAR) inform the extent of the ZVI. Area of Outstanding An area of countryside in England, Wales or Natural Beauty (AONB) Northern Ireland which has been designated for conservation due to its significant landscape value. Areas are designated in recognition of their national importance European Landscape The ELC promotes the protection, Convention (ELC) management and planning of European landscapes; raises awareness of the value of a living landscape; and organises European co-operation on landscape issues. It is the first international treaty to be exclusively concerned with all dimensions of European landscape International Union for Provides definitions and guidelines for Conservation of Nature categories of protected landscapes, (IUCN) including National Parks. South Downs National Park covering an area of 1,627 square Park (SDNP) kilometres (628 sq mi) in southern England. It stretches for 140 kilometres (87 mi) from Winchester in the west to Eastbourne in the east, through the counties of Hampshire, August 2019 Environmental Assessment Report Chapter 7 – Landscape and Visual A27 Arundel Bypass – PCF Stage 2 Further Consultation TERM DEFINITION West Sussex and East Sussex. The national park covers the chalk hills of the South Downs and a substantial part of a separate physiographic region, the western Weald, with its heavily wooded sandstone and clay hills and vales. The South Downs Way spans the entire length of the park and is the only National Trail that lies wholly within a national park.. South Downs National The South Downs National Park Authority is Park Authority (SDNPA) the statutory planning authority for the National Park area. International Dark Sky The IDA works to protect the night skies for Association (IDA) present and future generations International Dark Sky An IDA International Dark Sky Reserve is a reserve public or private land possessing an exceptional or distinguished quality of starry nights and nocturnal environment that is specifically protected for its scientific, natural, educational, cultural, heritage and/or public enjoyment. Reserves consist of a core area meeting minimum criteria for sky quality and natural darkness, and a peripheral area that supports dark sky preservation in the core. The SDNP received Bronze level status in 2016. Dark skies are a recognised Special Quality of the SDNP. Ordnance Datum (OD) Vertical datum used by an ordnance survey as the basis for deriving altitudes on maps. A spot height may be expressed as AOD for ‘Above Ordnance Datum’ to identify altitude above the OD. August 2019 Environmental Assessment Report Chapter 7 – Landscape and Visual A27 Arundel Bypass – PCF Stage 2 Further Consultation 7 Landscape and Visual 7.1 Introduction 7.1.1.1 This chapter provides the baseline and assessment of the potential impacts associated with landscape and visual impacts arising from the Scheme. This chapter has been completed in accordance with IAN 135/10 (this supersedes DMRB Volume 11, Section 3, Part 51). The potential impacts typical of this type of project and which are considered in this chapter are: ▪ Construction phase: - Temporary and permanent impacts of the construction of the Scheme on the landscape and visual resource, such as the removal of existing vegetation and earthworks - Impacts of the construction process itself, such as additional traffic movement, temporary lighting, signage and the presence of temporary work compounds. ▪ Operational phase: - Permanent change to the landscape and visual resource resulting from the presence of the Scheme - Impacts of mitigation and enhancement measures in offsetting adverse impacts of the Scheme - Perceptual impacts of moving traffic caused by high sided vehicles, light coloured vehicles, glinting effects of sunlight on vehicles as well as the impact of additional junction lighting at Crossbush and the Ford Road roundabout. 7.1.1.2 This chapter should be read in conjunction with: ▪ Chapter 6: Cultural Heritage ▪ Chapter 8: Biodiversity ▪ Chapter 11: Noise and Vibration. 1 Highways Agency, Design Manual for Roads and Bridges HA208/07, Volume 11, Section 3, Part 5 (August 2007) Page 7-1 August 2019 Environmental Assessment Report Chapter 7 – Landscape and Visual A27 Arundel Bypass – PCF Stage 2 Further Consultation 7.2 Legislative and policy framework 7.2.1.1 The broad legislative and policy framework relevant to environmental assessment of the Scheme is set out in Chapter 1: Introduction of this EAR. Table 7-1 summarises the legislation, regulatory and policy framework applicable to the landscape and visual assessment. Table 7-1 - Legislation, regulatory and policy framework applicable to the landscape and visual assessment Name Summary Directives/Legislation The European The European Landscape Convention (ELC) was Landscape ratified in the UK on 21 November 2006 and Convention (ELC) became binding on 1 March 2007. It provides a 2007 basis for closer co-operation on landscape issues across Europe. The Convention highlights the need to recognise landscape in law and encourages the integration of landscape into all relevant areas of policy, including cultural, economic and social policies. The ELC applies to natural, rural, urban and peri-urban areas including land, inland water and marine areas.
Recommended publications
  • Employment Land Review Final Report

    Employment Land Review Final Report

    Site Name Land West of Malling Down, Lewes Reference P1 (24LW) Total site area (ha) 6.2 Current uses Agricultural Land Undeveloped land (ha) 6.2 Number of units 0 Grid reference 542286 111512 Sequential status Out­of­centre (offices only) Site status Not allocated in Local Plan Density N/A Criteria Comment Score (out of 5) Strategic access Adjacent to A26 although reported congestion in this location 3 Local accessibility Scope to provide direct site access off A26 with improved junction; on a (local road access and good bus route with bus stops on Malling Down within 150 m; 3 public transport) Train/bus stations beyond 1 km and not within walking distance. Proximity to urban areas Adjoins northern edge of Lewes urban area, beside residential area and access to labour & providing local labour supply; distant from town centre services and no 3 services significant local services Compatibility of adjoining Open land on two sides, road to east; residential area to south but 4 uses large site offers scope to minimise any conflicts with employment uses Development and Large, slightly sloping greenfield site; within National Park and flood environmental zone 1; likely impacts on landscape/views; no obvious physical 3 constraints development constraints and being promoted for housing by owner Market attractiveness Potentially high profile site adjacent to A26 but not near established employment areas and remote from services 3 Planning factors Within National Park and designated Countryside area; promoted as housing site by owner Barriers to
  • Land at Daveys Lane, Lewes, BN7 2BF FREEHOLD for SALE

    Land at Daveys Lane, Lewes, BN7 2BF FREEHOLD for SALE

    RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SITE WITH PLANNING FOR 4 ‘PASSIVHAUS’ HOUSES 0.4 A cres (0.16 Hectares) Land at Daveys Lane, Lewes, BN7 2BF • Planning approved for 4 large ‘Passivhaus’ residential units • Potential for 5/6 smaller units (STP) • Located in a town centre area of regeneration FREEHOLD FOR SALE Commercial & Residential Property throughout Sussex Commercial Head Office • 23 & 24 Marlborough Place • Brighton • East Sussex • BN1 1UB • Tel 01273 688882 • Fax 01273 627419 Commercial & Residential Estate Agents • Relocation Consultancy • Development Advice • Valuation • Landlord & Tenant • Feasibility Studies • Property Management • Business Rates www.oakleyproperty.com LOCATION In addition to the main site (A) our client also owns the access road leading to it (B) and the adjoining site (C) shown on the identification plan Lewes is the County Town of East Sussex and a popular administrative overleaf, which has potential for further residential development. The and business centre being situated 8 miles north east of Brighton at the vendor is open to offers that will include the sale of the road or obligations junction of the A27 south coast road and the A26. The port of Newhaven to improve the surface and boundaries approaching the site. is 8 miles south east and the Crawley/Gatwick diamond is approximately 19 miles north west via the A23, which connects to the A27 approximately 7 miles east of Lewes. Lewes also benefits from excellent public transport TENURE links with comprehensive bus services centred on the bus station. Lewes Freehold with vacant possession. mainline railway station offers frequent services to London Victoria (64 minutes), Brighton (14 minutes) and Gatwick (34 minutes).
  • South Downs Way Off-Road Bike Ride

    South Downs Way Off-Road Bike Ride

    SDW 2016 240x675:Layout 1 06/08/2015 17:29 Page 1 NOTE: Follow the South Downs CAUTION Way ACORN symbol and British Please go right, Ro ad Crossing Heart Foundation arrows. around Beacon Hill (erosion issues). Long stay parking START (s ee map below) 5 Miles 33.0 Miles Food & drink to buy, free water, toilets. South Downs NOTE: You cannot Manor Farm, Hill Barn leave your car at the Lane, Cocking, GU29 0HS Support drivers welcome - start for the 25 Miles Ample free parking in event duration of the event. N NEW CHECKPOINT 2 field (not public car park) Way Off-road CAUTION Road Crossing CAUTION CUT-OFF: 12pm Road Crossing Bike Ride W E WATER TAP 30 Miles Long stay Pay & Display parking at Chesil map Street Multi Storey, Barfield Close, SO23 0HU Chilcomb Sports Ground, Petersfield Road (A31). S CAUTION CAUTION Route stats: Start time: St eep descent Road Crossing 96.8 miles (156 km) with 3,940 metres of climbing 5.00am - 6.00am START 34 miles (55 km) with 1,330 metres of climbing 11.45am -12.15pm Che ckpoints: Distance: Cut-off times (1) Queen Elizabeth Country Park 20.0m 10.00am 1 (2) Manor Farm, Hill Barn Lane, Cocking 33.0m 12.00pm 3 (3) Bury Hill 42.7m 1.30pm (4) Washington 51.9m 3.00pm (5) Upper Beeding 58.5m 3.30pm (6) Devil’s Dyke(start of 35 mile route) 62.8m 4.30pm (7) Itford Farm 80.7m 6.30pm (8) River Lane, Alfriston 87.7m 8.00pm (9) Eastbourne 96.8m 9.00pm 10 Miles CAUTION 35 Miles Ride control: 07970 060701 St eep Descent CAUTION Keep straight ahead Road Crossing through middle of field CUT-OFF: 1.30pm 42.7 Miles Close gate - danger of CAUTION CAUTION cows escaping.
  • A27 Corridor Feasibility Study Report 2 of 3: Option Assessment Report

    A27 Corridor Feasibility Study Report 2 of 3: Option Assessment Report

    February 2015 A27 CORRIDOR FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT 2 OF 3: OPTION ASSESSMENT REPORT Highways Agency [Job number: 3511134AFJ] A27 Corridor Feasibility Study Report 2 of 3: Option Assessment Report 3511134AFJ-PTG Prepared for Highways Agency Federated House Dorking Prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff Godalming www.pbworld.com AUTHORISATION SHEET Client: Highways Agency Project: A27 Corridor Feasibility Study Address: PREPARED BY Name: Claudia Di Loreto Position: Assistant Transportation Planner – Parsons Brinckerhoff Name: Thomas Pettyt Position: Assistant Transportation Planner – Parsons Brinckerhoff Name: Rohan McGinn Position: Regional Associate – Parsons Brinckerhoff Date: October 2014 AGREED BY Name: Colin McKenna Position: Technical Director – Parsons Brinckerhoff Date: February 2015 AUTHORISED FOR ISSUE Name: Theo Genis Position: Regional Associate – Parsons Brinckerhoff Date: February 2015 DISTRIBUTION ACCEPTED BY Name: Position: Date: ACCEPTED BY Name: Position: Date: A27 Corridor Feasibility Study Report 2 of 3: Option Assessment Report CONTENTS Page 1 Executive Summary 8 1.1 Introduction to A27 Corridor Feasibility Study Reports 8 1.2 Stakeholder Engagement during Study 8 1.3 Generating Options 9 1.4 Sifting Options 9 1.5 Options prioritised for further assessment 10 2 Introduction to Study Stage 2 11 2.1 Overview of A27 Corridor Feasibility Study 11 2.2 Purpose of Report and Approach to Study Stage 2 11 2.3 Structure of This Report 13 3 Summary of Findings of Study Stage 1 14 3.1 Overview 14 3.2 Background 14 3.3 Overview of Current
  • Linneysfield

    Linneysfield

    Linneysfield Bridleway Hove 6, Devil’s Dyke Road, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 8YJ Linneysfield Bridleway Hove 6, Devil’s Dyke Road, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 8YJ A superb rural retreat nestled in the South Downs National Park with outbuildings and services connected and full planning consent (partially completed) for a day lodge and stabling, located within 5 miles of Brighton city centre and with excellent access for London and the south coast. IN ALL ABOUT 2.7 ACRES Offers in excess of £400,000 Location vehicles. The Vendor has carried out various Linneysfield is just off the Devil’s Dyke Road landscaping and planting works over a number nestled in the South Downs National Park in a of years and there are now mature trees and secluded yet accessible location on the edge of hedges creating distinctive areas and screening the renowned Devil’s Dyke valley tucked away off both from the Bridleway and around the a public bridleway enjoying a superb outlook over buildings and parking areas. Beyond the surrounding countryside with far reaching views to buildings and parking area is a pretty parcel of the south and west. The property is just 5 miles pasture gently sloping down to the south west from Brighton city centre with its seafront and taking in glorious views of the surrounding beaches, host of cultural attractions, shopping and countryside. leisure opportunities and main line train station The property is suitable for a range of purposes with services to London Victoria. including leisure and amenity use. On the land The main A27 road is within 2 miles of the property itself, subject to the twenty-eight day rule and, providing excellent connections to the south coast any other necessary consents, the owner can whilst the A23 London Road is within 3 miles and enjoy and potentially earn income from a provides easy access to London and connects to variety of recreational activities, including the M23, M25 and wider national motorway equestrian pursuits, clay pigeon and, target network.
  • Govia Thameslink Railway Penalty Fares Scheme

    Govia Thameslink Railway Penalty Fares Scheme

    GOVIA THAMESLINK RAILWAY PENALTY FARES SCHEME CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2 PENALTY FARES TRAINS 3 PENALTY FARES STATIONS 4 COMPULSORY TICKETS AREAS 5 TICKET FACILITIES 6 PUBLICITY AND WARNING NOTICES 7 SELECTION AND TRAINING OF AUTHORISED COLLECTORS 8 WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORISED COLLECTORS 9 TICKET FACILITIES AND DISPLAY OF WARNING NOTICES 10 SELLING TICKETS ON BOARD TRAINS 11 ARRANGEMENTS WITH OTHER OPERATORS 12 APPEALS Govia Thameslink Railway 2 1 July 2015 Penalty Fares Scheme 1 Introduction 1.1 We, Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR) Ltd, give notice, under rule 3.2 of the Penalty Fares Rules 2002 that we wish to continue to operate a Penalty Fares Scheme across the Thameslink, Southern and Great Northern (TSGN) franchise, with effect from 26th July 2015. This document describes our Penalty Fares Scheme for the purposes of rule 3.2 b. 1.2 We have decided to introduce a Penalty Fares Scheme because the previous operator of the railway passenger services comprised of the Thameslink Great Northern franchise, First Capital Connect and Southern Railways, operated a Penalty Fares Scheme in such franchise area and the experience has proved that it is an efficient means to deter ticketless travel. In addition, once some Southeastern routes and stations are integrated into the TSGN franchise from 14 December 2014 and once the entire current Southern franchise is integrated into the TSGN franchise on 26th July 2015, it is important that there is consistency across all franchise areas (as Southeastern and Southern both also operate a Penalty Fares Scheme); so as to avoid causing confusion for our passengers. This scheme will now include all stations under schemes previously operated by Govia Thameslink Railway Limited and Southern Railway Limited.
  • Local Roads Study Western Tie-In: Local Roads Study A27 Arundel Bypass – PCF Stage 2 Further Consultation

    Local Roads Study Western Tie-In: Local Roads Study A27 Arundel Bypass – PCF Stage 2 Further Consultation

    A27 Arundel Bypass Western tie-in: local roads study Western tie-in: local roads study A27 Arundel Bypass – PCF Stage 2 Further Consultation Table of Contents Table of Contents 5 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of report 1 1.2 Project background 2 1.3 A27 Arundel Bypass scheme options 2 1.4 Western tie-in junction 4 2 Current conditions 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Existing land use and demographics 7 2.3 Road network 9 2.4 Bus network 9 2.5 Walking and cycle network 11 2.6 Rail network 13 2.7 Traffic volumes 13 3 Future situation 18 3.1 Introduction 18 3.2 Modelling methodology 18 3.3 Forecasting results 21 3.4 Operational modelling 28 3.5 Impact on bus services 30 3.6 Traffic movement restrictions on Tye Lane, Shellbridge and Mill Road 30 4 Summary 31 4.1 Summary 31 LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1: Bus services serving Yapton/ Walberton 11 Table 2-2: Traffic flows near Yapton Lane level crossing 13 Version P03 Western tie-in: local roads study A27 Arundel Bypass – PCF Stage 2 Further Consultation Table 3-1: Western tie-in junction performance Option 4/5AV1 29 Table 3-2: Option 4/5AV1: western tie-in operational assessment (Yapton Lane sensitivity)29 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1: Local roads study area 1 Figure 1-2: A27 Arundel Bypass scheme options 3 Figure 1-3: Option 4/5AV1 western tie-in junction 5 Figure 1-4: Option 5BV1 western tie-in junction 6 Figure 2-1: Arun district wards 7 Figure 2-2: Bus routes within Arundel 10 Figure 2-3: Public rights of way network 12 Figure 2-4: AM turning movements existing western tie-in 14 Figure 2-5: PM turning
  • Roman Roads of Britain

    Roman Roads of Britain

    Roman Roads of Britain A Wikipedia Compilation by Michael A. Linton PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 02:32:02 UTC Contents Articles Roman roads in Britain 1 Ackling Dyke 9 Akeman Street 10 Cade's Road 11 Dere Street 13 Devil's Causeway 17 Ermin Street 20 Ermine Street 21 Fen Causeway 23 Fosse Way 24 Icknield Street 27 King Street (Roman road) 33 Military Way (Hadrian's Wall) 36 Peddars Way 37 Portway 39 Pye Road 40 Stane Street (Chichester) 41 Stane Street (Colchester) 46 Stanegate 48 Watling Street 51 Via Devana 56 Wade's Causeway 57 References Article Sources and Contributors 59 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 61 Article Licenses License 63 Roman roads in Britain 1 Roman roads in Britain Roman roads, together with Roman aqueducts and the vast standing Roman army, constituted the three most impressive features of the Roman Empire. In Britain, as in their other provinces, the Romans constructed a comprehensive network of paved trunk roads (i.e. surfaced highways) during their nearly four centuries of occupation (43 - 410 AD). This article focuses on the ca. 2,000 mi (3,200 km) of Roman roads in Britain shown on the Ordnance Survey's Map of Roman Britain.[1] This contains the most accurate and up-to-date layout of certain and probable routes that is readily available to the general public. The pre-Roman Britons used mostly unpaved trackways for their communications, including very ancient ones running along elevated ridges of hills, such as the South Downs Way, now a public long-distance footpath.
  • Highways England by EMAIL to Info@Highwaysengland.Co.Uk A27

    Highways England by EMAIL to [email protected] A27

    Brighton and Hove Cycling Campaign www. bricycles.org.uk www.facebook.com/Bricycles https://twitter.com/Bricycles 2 Glovers Yard 121 – 123 Havelock Road Brighton BN1 6GN 4 December 2016 Highways England BY EMAIL to [email protected] A27 East of Lewes improvement scheme consultation On behalf of Bricycles (Brighton and Hove Cycling Campaign) and as a Cycling UK campaigner for Brighton and Hove, I am writing in response to the above consultation. I am a frequent cyclist in Sussex and often lead groups of cyclists on day rides into the countryside and through towns. The South Coast Multi Modal study of 2002 1 (to which we gave input) recommended demand management “to control the overall level of future car usage, particularly in locations where there are, or will be, good alternative transport systems” and higher parking charges workplaces and at out of town retail centres, along with charges for entry into the major towns/cities in a coherent regional approach. It is therefore disappointing that millions of pounds have been awarded for the A27 road upgrade to solve ‘congestion’ without reference to a thorough multimodal analysis of transport needs and the development of a region wide strategy addressing public transport, walking & cycling aiming to minimise the use of the private car as suggested in the SoCoMMS report. Road funding encourages yet more road traffic (and therefore more congestion) and deprives other modes of much needed investment. Current problems and issues The A27 severs walking and cycling routes. There are few crossing points. Some crossings are hazardous. Roads that join the A27 are also trafficky and unpleasant.
  • Landscape and Ecology Study of Greenfield Sites in Worthing Borough

    Landscape and Ecology Study of Greenfield Sites in Worthing Borough

    Landscape Architecture Masterplanning Ecology Landscape and Ecology Study of Greenfield Sites in Worthing Borough November 2015 Rev B hankinson duckett associates telephone: 01491 838175 email: [email protected] website: www.hda-enviro.co.uk post: The Stables, Howbery Park, Benson Lane, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BA Hankinson Duckett Associates Limited Registered in England & Wales 3462810 Registered Office: The Stables, Howbery Park, Benson Lane, Wallingford, OX10 8BA Landscape and Ecology Study of Greenfield Sites in Worthing 2015 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This Landscape and Ecology Study of Greenfield Sites in Worthing was prepared by Hankinson Duckett Associates (HDA). The study was commissioned and funded by the joint authority of Adur and Worthing Councils. The work has been guided by Ian Moody, Principal Planning Officer of Adur and Worthing Councils. Landscape and Ecology Study of Greenfield Sites in Worthing 2015 CONTENTS Fgures 1 Introduction page 1 Fig 1 Greenfield Site Locations page 5 2 Method Statement page 1 Fig 2 Solid and Drift Geology page 6 3 Policy Context page 3 Fig 3 Topography page 7 4 Landscape and Ecology Context page 3 Fig 4 Agricultural Land Classification page 8 5 Site 1: Land North of Beeches Avenue (WB08176) page 20 Fig 5 National Character Areas and Landscape Typologies page 9 Site 2: Worthing United Football Club (WB0162) page 26 Fig 6 West Sussex Landscape Character Areas page 10 Site 3: Upper Brighton Road (WB08063) page 30 Fig 7 Local Landscape Character Areas page 11 Site 4: Goring-Ferring Gap (WB088182)
  • A27 Arundel Bypass Environmental Assessment Report

    A27 Arundel Bypass Environmental Assessment Report

    A27 Arundel Bypass Environmental Assessment Report Appendix 1-1: South Downs National Park Special Quality Assessment 30 August 2019 SDNP Special Quality Assessment A27 Arundel Bypass – PCF Stage 2 Further Consultation Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 Purpose of the report 1-1 1.2 Overview of the project 1-1 1.3 SDNP special qualities 1-2 1.4 Structure of the SDNP special qualities assessment report 1-3 1.5 Legislative and policy framework 1-4 1.6 Sub-regional and local planning policy 1-8 LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1 - SDNP special qualities assessment structure 1-3 2 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY 2-1 2.1 Introduction 2-1 2.2 Assessment process 2-1 2.3 Potential impacts 2-3 2.4 Guidance 2-4 2.5 Assessment results 2-12 2.6 Assumptions and limitations 2-13 LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1 - Types of impact associated with each special quality 2-4 Table 2-2 - Alignment between DMRB and the potential impacts identified 2-6 Table 2-3 - General assumptions and limitations 2-13 August 2019 SDNP Special Quality Assessment A27 Arundel Bypass – PCF Stage 2 Further Consultation 3 SPECIAL QUALITY 1: DIVERSE, INSPIRATIONAL LANDSCAPES AND BREATHTAKING VIEWS 3-1 3.1 Introduction 3-1 3.2 Assessment methodology 3-2 3.3 Assessment assumptions and limitations 3-5 3.4 Study Area 3-5 3.5 Baseline conditions 3-5 3.6 Scoping 3-5 3.7 Design, mitigation and enhancement 3-6 3.8 Assessment of potential impacts 3-9 3.9 Summary of landscape character, visual amenity and experience 3-18 LIST OF TABLES Table 3-1 - Assessment assumptions and limitations for SQ1 3-5 Table 3-2
  • Arun District Council Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

    Arun District Council Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

    Arun District Council Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment Stage 7 Site Assessment Final Report December 2009 Arun District Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment: Stage 7 Site Assessment Final Report CONTENTS 1. Introduction............................................................................................................ 2 2. Study methodology............................................................................................... 5 3. Market assessment ............................................................................................ 11 4. Sites with planning permission for housing...................................................... 23 5. Site specific sources within settlements........................................................... 25 6. Site specific sources outside settlements .................................................... 28 7. Conclusions ……………………………………………………………………….42 APPENDICES Appendix 1 Site assessment criteria Appendix 2 Sites with planning permission Appendix 3 Rejected sites within settlements Appendix 4 Sites with potential within settlements Appendix 5 Site yield summary table Appendix 6 Rejected sites outside settlements Appendix 7 Sites with planning permission outside settlements Appendix 8 Sites with future potential outside settlements Appendix 9 Sites with future potential outside settlements where availability is uncertain Appendix 10 Settlement maps and all sites assessed Appendix 11 Landscape appraisal December 2009 1 Arun District Strategic Housing Land