DOCSLIB.ORG

Archaeological Desk Based Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Archaeological Desk Based Assessment ARCHAEOLOGICAL DESK BASED ASSESSMENT Land at 62 Hatcham Road and 134-140 Ilderton Road South Bermondsey London SE15 1TW v.2 February 2018 Local Planning Authority: London Borough of Southwark Site centred at: TQ 35188 77929 Author: Manca Petric MA ACIfA Approved by: Matthew Smith BSc MCIfA Report Status: Final Issue Date: September 2017 Update: February 2018 CgMs Ref: MP/MS/23429 © CgMs Limited No part of this report is to be copied in any way without prior written consent. Every effort is made to provide detailed and accurate information, however, CgMs Limited cannot be held responsible for errors or inaccuracies within this report. © Ordnance Survey maps reproduced with the sanction of the controller of HM Stationery Office. Licence No: AL 100014723 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment Land at 62 Hatcham Road and 134-140 Ilderton Road, South Bermondsey, London SE15 1TW CONTENTS Executive Summary 1.0 Introduction and Scope of Study 2.0 Planning Background and Development Plan Framework 3.0 Geology and Topography 4.0 Archaeological/Historical Background and Assessment of Significance 5.0 Site Conditions, the Proposed Development and Impact on Heritage Assets 6.0 Summary and Conclusions Sources Consulted LIST OF FIGURES Fig. 1 Site Location Fig. 2 HER Data Plot (data from Greater London HER) Fig. 3 1729 Senex Map Fig. 4 1766 Rocque Map of London Fig. 5 1797 Stockdale Map Fig. 6 1822 Cary Map Fig. 7 1842 St Giles Camberwell Tithe Map Fig. 8 1848 Wyld Map Fig. 9 1861-62 Weller Map Fig. 10 1877 Stanford Map Fig. 11 1916 Ordnance Survey Map Fig. 12 1937 Ordnance Survey Map Fig. 13 1945 Bomb Damage Map Fig. 14 1952 Ordnance Survey Map Fig. 15 1962 Ordnance Survey Map Fig. 16 1983-87 Landmark Historical Map Fig. 17 2016 Google Earth Image Fig. 18 Proposed Development: Ground Floor CgMs Heritage (part of RPS) 1 MP/MS/23429 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment Land at 62 Hatcham Road and 134-140 Ilderton Road, South Bermondsey, London SE15 1TW PLATES Plate 1: Entrance to study site from north. Plate 2: Entrance to study site from east. Plate 3: North-facing photograph taken from the central area of site. Plate 4: East-facing photograph taken from the central area of site. Plate 5: Waste piled up within the study site. Plate 6: Waste piled up within the study site. APPENDICES Appendix 1: Exploratory hole locations (Jomas Associates Ltd 2017) CgMs Heritage (part of RPS) 2 MP/MS/23429 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment Land at 62 Hatcham Road and 134-140 Ilderton Road, South Bermondsey, London SE15 1TW EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Land at 62 Hatcham Road and 134-140 Ilderton Road, South Bermondsey, SE15 1TW, London Borough of Southwark, has been reviewed for its archaeological potential. • Redevelopment proposals currently comprise the construction of a block of residential flats with commercial space. No basements are proposed. • In accordance with central and local government planning policy and guidance, a desk based assessment has been undertaken to clarify the archaeological potential of the study area. • The study site is located within the Bermondsey Lake Archaeological Priority Zone as defined by the Southwark Borough Council. • The study site is considered to have a medium to high potential for the existence of peat and consequently palaeo-environmental remains to be present on site, a low to medium potential for remains of Prehistoric human activity and for the Roman period and a low potential for the Medieval and the Post Medieval periods. • Modern activity at the study site is likely to have severely truncated any archaeological deposits that may have been present. • In view of the study site’s archaeological potential, combined with the past depositional impacts, the redevelopment proposals are considered unlikely to have a significant or widespread negative archaeological impact. If archaeological remains are present at the site, the available information indicates that they would be of local significance. • It is therefore considered that any archaeological interest on the site can be secured by an appropriately worded planning condition attached to the granting of consent. It is recommended that a geo-archaeological borehole survey is undertaken at the study site to determine the presence, extent and significance of archaeological deposits at the study site. CgMs Heritage (part of RPS) 3 MP/MS/23429 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment Land at 62 Hatcham Road and 134-140 Ilderton Road, South Bermondsey, London SE15 1TW 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF STUDY 1.0 This archaeological desk-based assessment has been prepared by Manca Petric and edited by Matthew Smith of CgMs Heritage (part of RPS) on behalf of Hatcham Road Ltd & 134-140 Ilderton Road LLP. 1.1 The assessment considers land at 62 Hatcham Road and 134-140 Ilderton Road, South Bermondsey, SE15 1TW, London Borough of Southwark. The site, also referred to as the study site, is approximately 1800m² in area and comprises industrial units. The site is bounded by Record Street to the north, Hatcham Road to the west, Ilderton Road to the east and industrial buildings to the south. The site is centred at National Grid Reference at TQ 35188 77929 (Fig. 1). 1.2 Hatcham Road Ltd & 134-140 Ilderton Road LLP have commissioned CgMs Heritage (part of RPS) to establish the archaeological potential of the site, and to provide guidance on ways to accommodate any archaeological constraints identified. 1.3 In line with national and local policy and guidance, this desk-based assessment comprises an examination of evidence on the Greater London Historic Environment Record (GLHER) and other sources. The report also includes the results of a comprehensive map regression exercise. 1.4 Additionally, in accordance with the ‘Standard and Guidance for Historic Environment Desk-Based Assessments’ (Chartered Institute for Archaeologists 2014), the assessment includes an examination of published and unpublished material and charts historic land-use through a map regression exercise. 1.5 As a result, the assessment enables relevant parties to assess the significance of archaeological assets on and close to the site, assesses the potential for hitherto undiscovered archaeological assets and thus enables potential impacts on assets to be identified along with the need for design, civil engineering or archaeological solutions. CgMs Heritage (part of RPS) 4 MP/MS/23429 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment Land at 62 Hatcham Road and 134-140 Ilderton Road, South Bermondsey, London SE15 1TW 2.0 PLANNING BACKGROUND AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN FRAMEWORK 2.1 Legislation regarding archaeology, including scheduled ancient monuments, is contained in the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979, amended by the National Heritage Act 1983 and 2002. 2.2 In March 2012, the government published the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). NPPF Planning Practice Guidance was published online 6th March 2014 (http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk). 2.3 Section 12 of the NPPF, entitled Conserving and Enhancing the Historic Environment provides guidance for planning authorities, property owners, developers and others on the conservation and investigation of heritage assets. Overall, the objectives of Section 12 of the NPPF can be summarised as seeking the: • Delivery of sustainable development • Understanding the wider social, cultural, economic and environmental benefits brought by the conservation of the historic environment • Conservation of England's heritage assets in a manner appropriate to their significance, and • Recognition of the contribution that heritage assets make to our understanding of the past. 2.4 Section 12 of the NPPF recognises that intelligently managed change may sometimes be necessary if heritage assets are to be maintained for the long term. Paragraph 128 states that planning decisions should be based on the significance of the heritage asset, and that level of detail supplied by an applicant should be proportionate to the importance of the asset and should be no more than sufficient to review the potential impact of the proposal upon the significance of that asset. 2.5 Heritage Assets are defined in Annex 2 of the NPPF as: a building, monument, site, place, area or landscape positively identified as having a degree of significance meriting consideration in planning decisions. They include designated heritage assets (as defined in the NPPF) and assets identified by the local planning authority during the process of decision-making or through the plan-making process. 2.6 Annex 2 also defines Archaeological Interest as a heritage asset which holds, or potentially could hold, evidence of past human activity worthy of expert investigation at some point. Heritage assets with archaeological interest are the primary source of CgMs Heritage (part of RPS) 5 MP/MS/23429 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment Land at 62 Hatcham Road and 134-140 Ilderton Road, South Bermondsey, London SE15 1TW evidence about the substance and evolution of places, and of the people and cultures that made them. 2.7 A Designated Heritage Asset comprises a: World Heritage Site, Scheduled Monument, Listed Building, Protected Wreck Site, Registered Park and Garden, Registered Battlefield or Conservation Area. 2.8 Significance is defined as: The value of a heritage asset to this and future generations because of its heritage interest. This interest may be archaeological, architectural, artistic or historic. Significance derives not only from a heritage asset’s physical presence, but also from its setting. 2.9 Setting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • July 2005 No.178, Quarterly, Distributed Free to Members
    NEWSLETTER Summer issue, July 2005 No.178, Quarterly, distributed free to members Registered with the Civic Trust and the London Forum of Amenity Societies, Registered Charity No.1058103 Website: www.brixtonsociety.org.uk Our next appearance: Sunday 25 September: Lambeth Country Show Ferndale Walk 16 & 17 July weekend Meet at 2-30 pm outside Clapham North Underground Station for a Once again we will be joining in with guided walk around Ferndale Ward, this big event in Brockwell Park, with led by Alan Piper. This will be a the Society’s stall in the usual area, circular route, based loosely on Brixton forming a block with kindred groups Heritage Trail No.2 but also including covering different parts of Lambeth. new or topical material. Do take the opportunity to check out our current publications, renew your membership and chat about your own interest in Brixton. Thursday 8 September: Revitalizing Brixton Caroline Townsend from Brixton Town Centre Office will update us on the Council’s big “Revitalize” package How well do you know your way around Ferndale which we first reported last October. Ward? The flats on the left recently replaced a Nearly a year on, how are the Brixton former prefab office at the corner of Hetherington parts of the plan shaping up? We hope and Kepler Roads, off Acre Lane. To the right is members will take the chance to one of the “pentagon blocks” of flats built by comment and ask questions. 7-30 pm Lambeth c.1968. Photo from James Toohill. at the Vida Walsh Centre, 2b Saltoun Road (facing Windrush Square) SW2.
    [Show full text]
  • 140 Ilderton Road, South Bermondsey, London SE15 1TW
    Archaeological Desk Based Assessment Land at 62 Hatcham Road and 134 - 140 Ilderton Road, South Bermondsey, London SE15 1TW NGR: TQ 35188 77929 Site Code: HRIR19 September 2019 TOUCHSTONE ARCHAEOLOGY The Ridings, White Elm Road, Danbury, Essex CM3 4LR Tel: 07976 275180 E: [email protected] www.touchstonearchaeology.co.uk © Touchstone Archaeology 2017 all rights reserved DOCUMENT CONTROL GRID Land at 62 Hatcham Road and 134 - 140 Ilderton Road, South Bermondsey, Project Name London SE15 1TW Author(s) Zoe Schofield Origination date September 2019 Reviser(s) Zoe Schofield Date of last revision Version V.01 Summary of N/A changes Client Reference HRIR19 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment in advance of the proposed development on the site of Land at 62 Hatcham Road and 134 - 140 Ilderton Road, South Bermondsey, London SE15 1TW Table of Contents 1 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................. 5 2 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 STUDY AREA ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 SCOPE OF DOCUMENT ........................................................................................................................................... 7 3 THE SITE ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trades Directory, 1911 .. L~U
    595 TRADES DIRECTORY, 1911 .. L~U Evans Laundry Ltd. 56 & 58 Coleman rd. Gentle Mrs. E. 186 Fawe Pk.rd.Putney SW Hawkins William Henry, U Wendell rd. Isis Laundries Limited, 15 Graveney rd. Peckham SE & receiving office, lb,Havil George Mrs. A.da, 10 Hetton st.HmrsmthW Shepherd's Bush W Tooting SW & 179 Queen's rd.PeckhmSEJ street, Camberwell SE Gibson M. 73 Cottenham rd.Up.HollowayN Haydon Milss Florence, :l46 New King'l Jaokson Bros.5 Swaffield rd.Wndswrth SW Evans Chas. W. 47 Dutton st.GreenwichSE Giddins Mrs. J. 58 Winfrith road, Wands- rood, Fulham SW Jackson A..E.Ii6 SunnyHill rd.Stceathm SW Everest Jas.52 Beethoven st.Queen's Pk W worth SW Hayes James & Sons Limited, ·129 Cold­ Jackson Mrs. Caroline, 2 & 4 Dimsdale rd. Ewiilll C. 35 Wimbledon rd. Tooting SW Gilbert Mrs.Martha, 26 Taunfon rd.Lee SE harbour lane, Brixton SW Fulham SW Excelsior Laundry, 66 Vanderbilt road, Gilby A.rthur, Cli.fford house, Crown hill, Haysome Mrs. S11rah, 29 West row, Kensal Jackson Mrs.E.601 Garratt !&.Wndswth SW Wandsworth SW Upper Norwood BE & 225 Knight's hill, New Town W Jackson E. Sa, Manor rd. Stk. Newingtn N1 Express Laundry Co. 342 Uxbridge rd W West Norwood SE Hazelbourne Laundry Limited, 7 Furze­ Jackson John, 246 Commercial road & 7fJ Eyres Edwin, 16 Lower Park road & 67 GHder Chas.Wm.l08 Stoke Newington rdN down market, Mitoham road, Tooting Evelina road, Peckham SE Gibbon road, Peckham BE Gillett's Laundry, 76 Duncombe road, SW; 188 Battersea Bridge road SW; Jacob Robert, 20 & 132 Goldhawk road, Fairweather James, 38 Peckham rye SE IIornsey Rise N 46 Battersea rise SW; 165 Lavender Shepherd's Bush W Farebrother Samuel James, 40 Hamilton Girling Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • 1851 Census Index for North West Kent
    NORTH WEST KENT FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY 1851 CENSUS INDEX FOR NORTH WEST KENT . LEWISHAM ’ 9.0. DARTFORD [in BROMLEY RD. SEVENOAKS RII Volume III Deptford St. Paul & St. Nicholas parishes Piece Nos. H.O.107/1584—85 ISBN()9513760447 North West Kent Family History Society 1851 CENSUS INDEX FOR NORTH WEST KENT Volume III Deptford St. Paul and St. Nicholas parishes Piece Numbers H0 107/ 1584, H0 107/ 1585 1990 Contents Introduction ii. Location of Census Microfilms and Transcripts iii. Historical Background _ iv. Arrangement of the Deptford 1851 Census Returns xi. Guide to Enumeration Districts and Folio Numbers xiv. Index of Streets 1—2. INDEX OF NAMES 3—166. Society Publications 167. (c) North West Kent Family History Society, 1990 ISBN 0 9513760 4 7 INTRODUCTION This volume is the third in the Society's series of indexes to the 1851 census of _ north west Kent, and is the result of some five years work. Its production would not have been possible without the help of a number of volunteers, and I would like to record my thanks and those of the Society to: — The transcribers and checkers who have helped with Deptford St. Paul and St. Nicholas — i. e. Bob Crouch, Rose Medley, Mary Mullett, Edna Reynolds, Helen Norris, Norman Sears, Len Waghorn and Malcolm Youngs. Of these, I would particularly like to single out Len Waghorn, who alone transcribed 20 of the 35 enumeration districts. -— Members of the Society with BBC or MS—DOS microcomputers, for their work on entering the data into computer files — i.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MAYOR of LONDON's SCHOOL AIR QUALITY AUDIT PROGRAMME St James Hatcham Church of England Primary School, London Borough of Lewisham
    The Mayor of London’s School Air Quality Audit Programme St James Hatcham Church of England Primary School, London Borough of Lewisham MAY 2018 THE MAYOR OF LONDON’S SCHOOL AIR QUALITY AUDIT THE MAYOR OF LONDON’S SCHOOL AIR QUALITY AUDIT Mayor’s Foreword Poor air quality is a major public health issue and cause of inequality in our city. It is shocking that in London alone, air pollution contributes to thousands of early deaths every year, and has been linked to strokes, heart attacks, asthma, dementia and smaller lungs in our children. We cannot allow this to continue. That is why, since becoming Mayor, I have made tackling poor air quality a priority. That is also why my administration has nearly doubled spending on cleaning up London’s toxic air and we are delivering the boldest and most ambitious plan to tackle air quality anywhere in the world. This includes introducing a new charge on the oldest, most polluting vehicles coming into central London, consulting on expanding the Ultra Low Emission Zone, making buses in London cleaner and greener, and reducing exposure to air pollution around schools. As part of this, we launched the Mayor’s School Air Quality Audit Programme in January 2017, with the aim of reducing emissions and primary school children’s exposure to polluted air. I am delighted that this programme has now been completed, with 50 audits undertaken at primary schools located in the most polluted areas of London. We are confident that implementing the recommendations from these audits will go a long way to delivering cleaner air, reducing health inequalities and, most importantly, improving the health and wellbeing of our children.
    [Show full text]
  • Hatcham Conservation Area Character Appraisal Hatcham Conservation Area
    Hatcham conservation area character appraisal Hatcham conservation area Hatcham conservation area covers practice advice. Appraisals are not a commercial area along New comprehensive studies and the omission of Cross Road as well as a residential a particular building, feature or space should area of terraced housing between not be taken to imply that it does not New Cross Road and New Cross contribute to the character of the area. The Gate station. New Cross Road is character of the conservation area derives an old road which originally linked from all the elements outlined in this appraisal the Kent countryside to London until with their interrelationships being just as the area began to develop slowly important as their individual existence. from farms and country houses in the eighteenth century. Hatcham This appraisal will be a material consideration Park was one of those country when determining planning applications and houses which was built on land planning appeals relating to Hatcham owned by the Haberdashers’ conservation area. Information on planning Company. The coming of the railway controls and appropriate alterations are given to New Cross Gate in 1835 in the Hatcham supplementary planning prompted speculative development and Hatcham Park was demolished document available from the planning to make way for terraced housing information desk. which was strictly controlled by the Haberdashers. This document was made available for public consultation October and November Today New Cross Road is still a busy 2005 in accordance with the Planning (local thoroughfare and commercial centre that development) Regulations 2004. Residents offsets the charm and tranquility of the and businesses in the area were sent details residential terraces which still have the same and invited to a public meeting to discuss the appearance as when they were finished character appraisal as well as the proposed towards the end of the 19th century.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, Octobeb 16, 1891. 5419 Akckd. Dunlop
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, OCTOBEB 16, 1891. 5419 Partnership Act, 1890. (who died intestate on the 17th day of July, 1891, and of THE undersigned, Thomas BenfieldHarbottle, hereby „ whose estate and effects letters of administration were J give notice that the Partnership heretofore subsist- granted to Jane Ludlow, of 27, St. Thomas-road, Old ing between David George Evans Alsop, Robert Jackson, Kent-road, in the county of Surrey, Widow, on the,llth Francis Bligb, and .myself, at 110, Gannon-street, in the day^of September. 1891, by the Principal Registry of the city of London, under the firm of Bligh, Harbottle, and Prolate Division of Her Majesty's High Court of Justice), Co., and in Sydney, in the Colony of New South Wales, are hereby required to send in the particulars of their and Brisbane, in the Colony of Queensland, under the claims or demands to the undersigned, John Rexworthy, fflmof Harbottle, Alsop, and Co., and in Melbourne, in 57, Cheapside, London aforesaid, Solicitor for the said the Colony bf Victoria, under the firm of Bligh and Har- administratrix, on or before the 10th day of December, boitle, has been dissolved, so far as regards my share 1891; and notice is hereby also given, that after that a'n'd interest in the said firms respectively.—Dated this day the said administratrix will proceed to distribute 15tb day of October, 1891. the assets of the deceased among the parties entitled THOS. B. HABBOTTLE. thereto, having regard only to the claims of which she shall then have had notice; and that she will not be liable for the assets, or any part thereof, so distributed, [Extract 'from the Edinburgh Gazette of October 13, to any person of whose debt or claim she shall not then 1891.] have had notice.—Dated this 10th day of October, 1891.
    [Show full text]
  • Thames Valley Archaeological Services
    T H A M E S V A L L E Y AARRCCHHAAEEOOLLOOGGIICCAALL S E R V I C E S Former Hatcham Liberal Club, 367-9 Queen's Road, New Cross, London Borough of Lewisham Archaeological Evaluation by Andrew Weale Site Code: HLC11 (TQ 3566 7685) Former Hatcham Liberal Club, 367–9 Queen’s Road, New Cross, London Borough of Lewisham An Archaeological Evaluation for REIS Construct by Andrew Weale Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd Site Code HLC11 March 2011 Summary Site name: Former Hatcham Liberal Club, 367–9 Queen’s Road, New Cross, London Borough of Lewisham Grid reference: TQ 3566 7685 Site activity: Evaluation Date and duration of project: 3rd–11th February 2011 Project manager: Steve Ford Site supervisor: Andrew Weale Site code: HLC 11 Area of site: c. 0.13ha Summary of results: The evaluation revealed a shallow pit of probable later post-medieval date beneath the foundations and floors of various 19th century buildings. The site is not considered to have any archaeological potential. Location and reference of archive: The archive is presently held at Thames Valley Archaeological Services, Reading and will be deposited at The Museum of London in due course, with accession code HLC11. This report may be copied for bona fide research or planning purposes without the explicit permission of the copyright holder. All TVAS unpublished fieldwork reports are available on our website: www.tvas.co.uk/reports/reports.asp. Report edited/checked by: Steve Ford9 15.03.11 Steve Preston9 15.03.11 i Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd, 47–49 De Beauvoir Road, Reading RG1 5NR Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • 05 Appendix 1
    NEW CROSS AREA FRAMEWORK September 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 New Cross Gate Area Framework, Draft for Consultation, September 2018 5th Studio, We Made That, Alan Baxter INTRODUCTION New Cross is experiencing great change as part of significant developmental transformation in South London. This study - jointly commissioned by the LONDON’S CENTRAL CITY OF London Borough of Lewisham, the Greater London ACTIVITIES ZONE LONDON Blackfriars Bank Tower Hill Authority and Transport for London - aims to establish the key strategies to guide that change towards what the Mayor of London has termed ‘good growth’: Embankment CANARY transformation that acknowledges and works with the London WHARF character of a particular place and its inhabitants and Bridge that is physically and socially diverse. Waterloo ROTHERHITHE B A Canada The extension of the Bakerloo line has the potential KE Water RL OO to radically alter New Cross as a place to live, L INE Elephant & Castle work and study. It could have a dramatic impact on BERMONDSEY patterns of movement across the area, while also creating a catalyst for changes to the physical and social environment experienced at street level. Old Kent Road 1 CROS THE THAMES GREENWICH This study establishes an evidence base that allows Old Kent Road 2 W S insight into the life of New Cross, its economy and E 1 KM N built environment and how that can be reinforced and CAMBERWELL NEW CROSS improved. The study will be used by LB Lewisham, New Cross the GLA and TfL as they work with local communities Gate to plan for the future of New Cross through projects SOUTHWARK PECKHAM like the LB Lewisham Local Plan, the Mayor’s To Highbury & New Cross Road/ A2 Islington London Plan, and the design of new Bakerloo line infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Weapons in Schools Protocol
    Lewisham Safer Schools Partnership and Lewisham Schools Offensive Weapons in Schools Protocol 1. Introduction 1.1 The Children and Young People's Plan 2015–18: It's everybody's business. The plan establishes how partner agencies will continue to work together to improve those outcomes that will make significant improvements to the lives and life-chances of Lewisham children and young people. All agencies across Lewisham who work for our children and young people share a single vision: Together with families, we will improve the lives and life chances of the children and young people in Lewisham. The vision is underpinned by three shared values: ▪ We will put children and young people first every time ▪ We will have the highest aspirations and ambitions for all our children and young people ▪ We will make a positive difference to the lives of children and young people. Lewisham’s Children and Young People’s Strategic Partnership has identified four key areas to improve outcomes for children and young people to be taken forward through our Children and Young People’s Plan 2015-18. These priority areas are: ▪ Build child and family resilience ▪ Be healthy and active ▪ Raise achievement and attainment ▪ Stay safe ➢ We will work across the partnership to ensure that the right of every child to live in a safe and secure environment, free from abuse, neglect and harm is protected. ➢ We will identify and protect children and young people at risk of harm and ensure that they feel safe. 1.2 Safer Lewisham Partnership Plan 2017-18 (see Appendix 1) The Safer Lewisham Annual Plan outlines the main priorities for the Safer Lewisham Partnership, which have been identified through the Strategic Assessment, and through consultation with residents.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, 20Th October 1961 7607
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 20TH OCTOBER 1961 7607 SCHEDULE to be a smoke control area, which Order is about An area within the City of Wakefield bounded on to be submitted to the Minister of Housing and Local the north by Standbridge Lane from its junction with Government for confirmation. Bull Lane to the eastern boundary of the Kettlethorpe 2. Subject to the exemptions provided by the Order Community Centre; on the east by the western and by virtue of section 11 (4) of the Act if, on any boundaries of the Kettlethorpe Working Men's Club, day after the Order has come into operation, smoke the Wakefield Corporation Depot and Nos. 12, 14, is emitted from a chimney of any building within 16 and 18 Hendal Lane ; on the south by the north- the smoke control area the occupier of that building western boundaries of Nos. 20 to 58 (even) Hendal shall be guilty of an offence and liable to a fine not Lane, the northern boundary of No. 70 Hendal Lane, exceeding £10 unless he proves that the emission of the western boundaries of Nos. 64, 66, 68 and 70 smoke was not caused by the use of any fuel other Hendal Lane and thence by Hendal Lane to its than authorised fuel. The authorised fuels include junction with Fishpond Lane ; and on the west by anthracite, coke and other carbonised fuels, gas and Fishpond Lane and Bull Lane; all of which area is electricity. more particularly delineated and coloured green on 3. If confirmed the Order wfll not come into opera- the map referred to in the Order.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Places of Worship Research Project
    The Diocese of Diocesan Mission & Pastoral Committee (DMPC) Southwark and Diocesan Advisory Committee for the Care of Churches (DAC) Former Places of Worship research project: booklet published in Autumn 2020 Photo: closed church of St Mary-at-Lambeth, now the Garden Museum The Diocese of Southwark The South London Church Fund and Southwark Diocesan Board of Finance is a company limited by guarantee (No 236594) Registered Office: Trinity House, 4 Chapel Court, Borough High Street, London SE1 1HW. Charity No 249678 Company Secretary: Ruth Martin Background to the project From approx. 2004 until 2015, the staff of the Pastoral Department, on behalf of the DMPC and DAC, carried out a research project to gain a more thorough knowledge of those buildings previously used for Anglican worship which were formerly connected with the Diocese of Southwark or its predecessor dioceses. Our thanks go in particular to Stephen Craven (previously Pastoral Department Administrator) and Andrew Lane (Deputy Diocesan Secretary, and Secretary to the DMPC and DAC) for their work on this project. Who is this booklet for? For the first time this booklet compiles, in one place, the results of the project’s findings. The resource is offered with the intention of assisting: • parishes wishing to explore the history of their former buildings; • academics and others carrying out research on topics such church architecture, or the history of the Anglican Church in South London and East Surrey; and • members of the public investigating their family history. Why might a church be ‘closed’? There are many reasons why these buildings have ceased to be used for regular services of Anglican public worship, including bomb-damage in the Second World War, ‘redundancy’ (formal closure), or replacement by newer church buildings.
    [Show full text]