Presentación De Powerpoint

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Presentación De Powerpoint REAR By: Alba and Claudia * Director: Alfred Hitchcock - Filmography - His awards Main characters The neighborhood Summary Our opinion on the film Links The end * Real name:Sir Alphred Joseph Hitchcock * He was born on 13th August 1899 in Leytonston (England) * He had a difficult childhood * Important film director and producer * He started to live in the US in 1940 * 1948: he became his own producer * He died on 29th April 1980 in Los Angeles * ALFRED HITCHCOCK’S FILMOGRAPHY • Number 13 (1922) • The Skin Game (1931) • Saboteur (1942) • Rear Window (1954) • Always Tell Your Wife • Mary (1931) • Shadow of a Doubt • To Catch a Thief (1955) (1923, short) • Rich and Strange (1931) (1943) • The Trouble with Harry • The Pleasure Garden • Number Seventeen • Lifeboat (1944) (1955) (1925) (1932) • Aventure Malgache • The Man Who Knew • The Mountain Eagle • Waltzes from Vienna (1944, short) Too Much (1956) (1926) (1934) • Bon Voyage (1944, • The Wrong Man (1956) • The Lodger: A Story of short) • The 39 Steps • Vertigo (1958) the London Fog (1927) • Spellbound (1945) (1935) • North by Northwest • The Ring (1927) • Secret Agent (1936) • Notorious (1946) (1959) • Downhill (1927) • Sabotage (1936) • The Paradine Case • Psycho (1960) • The Farmer's Wife (1928) (1947) • Young and Innocent • The Birds (1963) • Easy Virtue (1928) (1937) • Rope (1948) • Marnie (1964) • Champagne (1928) • The Lady Vanishes • Under Capricorn (1949) • Torn Curtain (1966) (1938) • The Manxman (1929) • Stage Fright (1950) • Topaz (1969) • Jamaica Inn (1939) • Blackmail (1929) • Strangers on a Train • Frenzy (1972) • Juno and the Paycock • Rebecca (1940) (1951) • Family Plot (1976) (1930) • Foreign Correspondent • I Confess (1953) • Murder! (1930) (1940) • Dial M for Murder (1954) • Elstree Calling (1930) • Mr. & Mrs. Smith (1941) • Suspicion (1941) *1968 - Memorial Award Irving Thalberg – Winner *1960 - Best Director - Psychosis - Nominee *1954 - Best Director - Rear Window - Nominee *1945 - Best Director - Spellbound - Nominee *1944 - Best Director - Shipwrecked - Nominee *1940 - Best Director - Rebecca – Nominee * *James Maitland Stewart, also known as Jimmy Stewart, was an American actor and a military officer. In this film, he was Jeff, the protagonist. * *Grace Patricia Kelly was an American actress who, after marrying Prince Rainier III in April 1956, became Princess of Monaco. In this film she acts as Lisa, who is Jeff’s girlfriend. * *Thelma Ritter was an American actress, best known for her comedic roles as working class characters. In this film she acts as Jeff’s doctor; she is also his nurse. * *Raymond William Stacy Burr was a Canadian-American actor, primarily known for his roles on television dramas. In this film he acts as the bad man; he is a strange person. * The neighborhood * The film is about a man who is a professional photographer. His name is Jeff. Jeff has a problem: he has a broken leg, so he can’t do anything and he has to be at home all the time. That is when the problem starts. The only entertainment he has is observing the other buildings through the window. In the morning, he looks at a girl in the other building;then, Stella (his doctor and nurse) visits him at home and, at night, his girlfriend Lisa has dinner with him. And that is all he does during the day. But, one day, when Lisa is away, he starts looking through the window and sees Thorwald arguing with his wife. That night, Thorwal, goes in and out of the house a few times and the next day the blinds of his wife’s room remained closed… What do you think happened next? * In my opinion, this film is great and * I think this film is one of the a very good example of a complex best films ever. I never and well-thought-of film. watched one like this one * The beginning is a little bit boring, and it does not get exciting until the before. It’s about mystery protagonist starts suspecting something bad has happened in the and about romance. I building he has been observing. recommend you to watch * Then, everything becomes very this film because I think you interesting because it is genuinely mysterious and you end up believing are going to enjoy watching a little bit of all. it. * I also recommend it. * () modern trailer *Rear windowthe end *Caught Snooping - Rear Window (7/10) Movie CLIP (1954) HD *Rear Window (8/10) Movie CLIP - Up the Stairs (1954) HD *7th November 2016 * .
Recommended publications
  • Silent Films of Alfred Hitchcock
    The Hitchcock 9 Silent Films of Alfred Hitchcock Justin Mckinney Presented at the National Gallery of Art The Lodger (British Film Institute) and the American Film Institute Silver Theatre Alfred Hitchcock’s work in the British film industry during the silent film era has generally been overshadowed by his numerous Hollywood triumphs including Psycho (1960), Vertigo (1958), and Rebecca (1940). Part of the reason for the critical and public neglect of Hitchcock’s earliest works has been the generally poor quality of the surviving materials for these early films, ranging from Hitchcock’s directorial debut, The Pleasure Garden (1925), to his final silent film, Blackmail (1929). Due in part to the passage of over eighty years, and to the deterioration and frequent copying and duplication of prints, much of the surviving footage for these films has become damaged and offers only a dismal representation of what 1920s filmgoers would have experienced. In 2010, the British Film Institute (BFI) and the National Film Archive launched a unique restoration campaign called “Rescue the Hitchcock 9” that aimed to preserve and restore Hitchcock’s nine surviving silent films — The Pleasure Garden (1925), The Lodger (1926), Downhill (1927), Easy Virtue (1927), The Ring (1927), Champagne (1928), The Farmer’s Wife (1928), The Manxman (1929), and Blackmail (1929) — to their former glory (sadly The Mountain Eagle of 1926 remains lost). The BFI called on the general public to donate money to fund the restoration project, which, at a projected cost of £2 million, would be the largest restoration project ever conducted by the organization. Thanks to public support and a $275,000 dona- tion from Martin Scorsese’s The Film Foundation in conjunction with The Hollywood Foreign Press Association, the project was completed in 2012 to coincide with the London Olympics and Cultural Olympiad.
    [Show full text]
  • "Sounds Like a Spy Story": the Espionage Thrillers of Alfred
    University of Mary Washington Eagle Scholar Student Research Submissions 4-29-2016 "Sounds Like a Spy Story": The Espionage Thrillers of Alfred Hitchcock in Twentieth-Century English and American Society, from The Man Who Knew Too Much (1934) to Topaz (1969) Kimberly M. Humphries Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.umw.edu/student_research Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Humphries, Kimberly M., ""Sounds Like a Spy Story": The Espionage Thrillers of Alfred Hitchcock in Twentieth-Century English and American Society, from The Man Who Knew Too Much (1934) to Topaz (1969)" (2016). Student Research Submissions. 47. https://scholar.umw.edu/student_research/47 This Honors Project is brought to you for free and open access by Eagle Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Research Submissions by an authorized administrator of Eagle Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "SOUNDS LIKE A SPY STORY": THE ESPIONAGE THRILLERS OF ALFRED HITCHCOCK IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY ENGLISH AND AMERICAN SOCIETY, FROM THE MAN WHO KNEW TOO MUCH (1934) TO TOPAZ (1969) An honors paper submitted to the Department of History and American Studies of the University of Mary Washington in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Departmental Honors Kimberly M Humphries April 2016 By signing your name below, you affirm that this work is the complete and final version of your paper submitted in partial fulfillment of a degree from the University of Mary Washington. You affirm the University of Mary Washington honor pledge: "I hereby declare upon my word of honor that I have neither given nor received unauthorized help on this work." Kimberly M.
    [Show full text]
  • Fear, Confusion and Stage Fright
    Film-Philosophy 11.1 June 2007 Hitchcock and Hume Revisited: Fear, Confusion and Stage Fright John Orr University of Edinburgh This essay is a return to the scene of a crime. In my recent book on Hitchcock (Orr 2005, 26- 52) I made an outrageously general argument for the affinity between Hitch’s narratives and David Hume’s reasoning about human nature. For something so speculative, you expect cracks to appear pretty soon. But my impulse since the book’s appearance has not been to feel I exaggerated – which I’m sure I did – but to sense that I did not go far enough. There was more to be said about this oblique, long distance liaison down the centuries and I now feel it best said through a film which I had not discussed at all, partly because I shared the general feeling that this was not one of Hitch’s most auspicious films. The acting was uneven, the tone whimsical, the plot often cluttered and it suffered, or so I thought, from that general uncertainty of touch that sometimes characterised Hitchcock’s return to England. But then again his short wartime film Bon Voyage (1944) has been underestimated, as were in different ways Under Capricorn (1949), the remade The Man Who Knew Too Much (1956) and later Frenzy (1972). As Michael Walker has pointed out (1999: 199-202), Stage Fright (1950) has a structural complexity, a narrative coherence and a textual density missing from his 1930s films like Young And Innocent (1937). In other words, it brings back to London in 1950 the innovating aspects of Hitchcock’s Hollywood aesthetic of the 1940s.
    [Show full text]
  • Under Capricorn Simpson, Helen (1897-1940)
    Under Capricorn Simpson, Helen (1897-1940) A digital text sponsored by Australian Literature Gateway University of Sydney Library Sydney 2003 http://purl.library.usyd.edu.au/setis/id/simunde © University of Sydney Library. The texts and images are not to be used for commercial purposes without permission Source Text: Prepared from the print edition published by Macmillan New York 1938 305pp. All quotation marks are retained as data. First Published: 1937 A823.91/S6131/J4/1 Australian Etext Collections at women writers novels 1910-1939 Under Capricorn New York Macmillan 1938 Book I. I have read that Capricornus, the heavenly Goat, being ascendant at nativitie, denieth honour to persons of quality, and esteeme to the Vulgar. Can a Starre do so by onlie shineing on a Woman in her pangs? Shall Capricornus bind a poore man the world ouer, no part, no Land undiscouered, where hee may shake free? I will not belieue it: nor that Honour (not forfeit) can be for euer hidd by decree of this distemperate Starre. A Limbo For Ladies. (i) THE year, eighteen hundred and thirty-one. The place, Sydney; a city whose streets were first laid by men in chains for the easier progress of the soldiers who guarded them. This city, growing slowly about a population of convicts and soldiers, had at that date no very penitential air. The harbour water, lively with sun; the many windmills, leisurely bestirring themselves; the ships at anchor, hung with marine laundry, ensigns trailing; the smoke of domestic chimneys: all these things contrived to lend Sydney an air of expectancy rather than despair.
    [Show full text]
  • Misreading Hitchcock: Masked Signs in Young and Innocent Harry Sanderson University of Western Australia, Perth, [email protected]
    Cinesthesia Volume 9 Article 4 Issue 2 Cultural Touchstones April 2019 Misreading Hitchcock: Masked Signs in Young and Innocent Harry Sanderson University of Western Australia, Perth, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cine Recommended Citation Sanderson, Harry (2019) "Misreading Hitchcock: Masked Signs in Young and Innocent," Cinesthesia: Vol. 9 : Iss. 2 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cine/vol9/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@GVSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cinesthesia by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@GVSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sanderson: Misreading Hitchcock Misreading Hitchcock: Masked Signs in Young and Innocent I. INTRODUCTION Semiotics is in principle the discipline studying everything which can be used in order to lie Umberto Eco, Theory of Semiotics The plot of Alfred Hitchcock’s Young and Innocent (1937) is familiar, and like its title it comes to us in well-delineated, straightforward parts.1 A man is wrongly accused of a murder, and flees the authorities while trying to prove his innocence. Gradually he charms a female accomplice, and concludes by finding the true killer. Hitchcock had used this basic structure in his 1935 film The 39 Steps, and continued to develop it through to films such as North by Northwest (1959). In spite of its generic narrative and status as a minor work, however, Young and Innocent presents a deeply engaging play of signage and signification. The film has a symmetrical structure, which will dictate the structure of my reading.
    [Show full text]
  • La Mort Aux Trousses
    LA MORT AUX TROUSSES North by northwest DE ALFRED HITCHCOCK FICHE TECHNIQUE lm fi USA - 1959 - 2h16 Réalisateur : che fi Alfred Hitchcock Scénario : Ernest Lehmann Montage : George Tomasini Photo : Robert Burks Musique : Bernard Herrmann Interprètes : Roger Thornhill, pris pour un espion dénommé Kaplan, est Cary Grant enlevé par deux hommes qui essaient de le tuer. Thornhill se rend au palais des Nations-Unies pour retrouver (Roger Thornhill) SYNOPSIS Townsend, qu’il croit être un de ses ravisseurs. Townsend Eva-Marie Saint est assassiné et Thornhill, pris pour le meurtrier, se sauve (Eve Kendall) à Chicago par le train. Pendant le voyage, il est séduit par James Mason Eve Kendall, qui l’aide à se cacher. Thornhill obtient un (Philip Vandamm) rendez-vous avec Kaplan dans un champ désert. Jessie Royce Landis CRITIQUE (Clara Thornhill) Leo G. Carroll Considéré par Hitchcock comme un “divertissement très amusant”, La mort aux trousses naît d’abord du désir du (Le «professeur») cinéaste de tourner une séquence sur le mont Rushmore, Philip Ober dans le Dakota du Sud (célèbre pour les figures géantes (Lester Townsend) des présidents américains sculptées à même la roche). A Josephine Hutchinson l’origine, Hitchcock voulait intituler son film, “L’Homme sur le nez de Lincoln”. Dès la première ébauche du scéna- (Mrs. Townsend) rio, le rôle est prévu pour James Stewart. Mais au fur et à Martin Landau mesure que se dessine le personnage, Hitchcock réalise (Leonard) que Cary Grant correspond mieux au personnage de Roger 1 Thornhill, personnage cynique, lant que «le réalisateur garde le contre, Thornhill ne peut qu’en- égoïste et puéril.
    [Show full text]
  • Simply-Hitchcock-1587911892. Print
    Simply Hitchcock Simply Hitchcock DAVID STERRITT SIMPLY CHARLY NEW YORK Copyright © 2017 by David Sterritt Cover Illustration by Vladymyr Lukash Cover Design by Scarlett Rugers All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. For permission requests, write to the publisher at the address below. [email protected] ISBN: 978-1-943657-17-9 Brought to you by http://simplycharly.com Dedicated to Mikita, Jeremy and Tanya, Craig and Kim, and Oliver, of course Contents Praise for Simply Hitchcock ix Other Great Lives xiii Series Editor's Foreword xiv Preface xv Acknowledgements xix 1. Hitch 1 2. Silents Are Golden 21 3. Talkies, Theatricality, and the Low Ebb 37 4. The Classic Thriller Sextet 49 5. Hollywood 61 6. The Fabulous 1950s 96 7. From Psycho to Family Plot 123 8. Epilogue 145 End Notes 147 Suggested Reading 164 About the Author 167 A Word from the Publisher 168 Praise for Simply Hitchcock “With his customary style and brilliance, David Sterritt neatly unpacks Hitchcock’s long career with a sympathetic but sharply observant eye. As one of the cinema’s most perceptive critics, Sterritt is uniquely qualified to write this concise and compact volume, which is the best quick overview of Hitchcock’s work to date—written with both the cineaste and the general reader in mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebook Download Alfred Hitchcock T
    ALFRED HITCHCOCK T PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Patrick McGilligan | 864 pages | 01 Apr 2005 | HarperCollins Publishers Inc | 9780060988272 | English | New York, NY, United States Alfred Hitchcock T PDF Book Choose an adventure below and discover your next favorite movie or TV show. Alma Reville. Sullivan, Jack I write all this out in the greatest detail in the script, and then I don't look at the script while I'm shooting. They were imprisoned in costumes that subtly combined fashion with fetishism. It's rather a shock when one is expecting a rabbit. University Press of Mississippi. Hitchcock and the Making of Marnie. Both men, it turns out, have the same boss, who gives each an order to eliminate the other. You can hardly expect rabbits to simply sit around waiting for a station break to end. From to , Hitchcock was the host of the television series Alfred Hitchcock Presents. Ep : The McGregor Affair Dopey McGregor makes his living carrying boxes to a medical college, unaware that they contain the remains of murder victims. Salesian College, Battersea. Some transitions between reels were hidden by having a dark object fill the entire screen for a moment. Ep : Lonely Place Dread stalks a ranch occupied by a farmer, his wife and a strange hired hand. Film director film producer screenwriter film editor actor. They soon rekindle their romance and plan to murder her husband. Amsterdam University Press. Archived from the original on 1 January Zanuck Jean Hersholt Jack L. Ep : Anyone for Murder? She kills the hired assassin in self-defence, so Milland manipulates the evidence to make it look like murder.
    [Show full text]
  • Under Capricorn Symposium Were Each Given a 30 Minute Slot to Deliver Their Paper and Respond to Questions
    Papers based on the Symposium held at Kings College, University of London, 5th & 6th September, 2019 1 Introductory Note Speakers at the Under Capricorn Symposium were each given a 30 minute slot to deliver their paper and respond to questions. In preparing for this collection, all the papers have been revised and several have been considerably developed to provide additional context, argument and analysis. Apart from changes in format introduced to create a unified document (and in one or two cases to integrate images), the papers appear as the writers submitted them. The papers are arranged in the order of the symposium programme, with one exception. Bertrand Tavernier was unfortunately unable to attend and his paper is the first the reader will encounter. Papers that do not appear in this collection are marked by an asterisk in the programme. 2 Under Capricorn at 70 King’s College, University of London th th 5 and 6 September 2019 Day 1 5 September 9:00 - 9:30 Registration 9:30 - 10:00 Welcome & Introductions 10:00 - 10:30 An Overview of Under Capricorn Stéphane Duckett 10:30 - 11:00 Hitchcock and Ireland Charles Barr * 11:00 - 11:30 Bewitched, Bothered and Bewildered. A Fairy Tale of Old Ireland Richard Blennerhassett 11:30 - 12:00 Teas & Coffees 12:00 - 12:30 Under Capricorn and Helen de Guerry Simpson Ed Gallafent 12:30 - 1:00 Under Capricorn and The Paradine Case Douglas Pye 1:00 - 2:00 Lunch 2:00 - 2:30 “Between P & B- The Past and the Bottle” or Ingrid Bergman’s Acting and Opinions on Acting Tytti Soila 2:30 - 3:00 Under Capricorn
    [Show full text]
  • The Genius of Hitchcock Part One: August 2012
    12/44 The Genius of Hitchcock Part One: August 2012 Special events include: x Tippi Hedren in Conversation x TV Preview + Q&A: THE GIRL – new BBC2 drama telling the full story of Hitchcock’s relationship with Tippi Hedren x Camille Paglia: Women & Magic in Hitchcock x The Lodger + composer Nitin Sawhney in Conversation Over the course of almost three months, Hitchcock’s surviving body of work as director will be presented in its entirety at BFI Southbank. The films will be grouped together, taking inspiration from one his most famous films to present the 39 Steps to the Genius of Hitchcock to help audiences increase their understanding of this complex and fascinating director. The first part of the BFI Southbank season in August, with special thanks to Sky Movies/HD, focuses on the first 12 steps, beginning with The Shaping of Alfred Hitchcock. The recent discovery in New Zealand of several reels of The White Shadow, scripted by Hitchcock, made international headlines. But other material, too, survives from his apprentice years, prior to The Pleasure Garden. In The Shaping of Hitchcock: Reflections on The White Shadow author Charles Barr will present a richly illustrated narrative of Hitchcock’s formative years, as an introduction to a screening of the thus-far incomplete The White Shadow (1924). BFI Future Film presents The DIY Thriller Film Fortnight to accompany the second step: The Master of Suspense. This course will give participants aged 15-25 the chance to make short thriller films inspired by Hitchcock. The Evolution of Style will look at the development of Hitchcock’s style – described by the director as ‘the first true Hitchcock film’, The Lodger (1926) introduces themes that would run through much of Hitchcock’s later work.
    [Show full text]
  • Hitchcock. Stairs Act As a Path Between Two States of Mind -- Blissful Ignorance Into Knowledge, Much Like Adam and Eve Taking a Bite of the Apple
    One of Alfred Hitchcock’s nicknames was the Master of Suspense. He knew how to make an audience jump. Rather than resorting to gore and horror, he played tricks with the mind and the viewer’s expectations. Born in England in 1899, his films reflect a combination of Victorian propriety at odds with Modern implications. He directed some 62 films over the span of his 54-year career. Most, though not all the films survive and there are still a few that are difficult to find. But in film after film, stairs play an important role for Hitchcock. Stairs act as a path between two states of mind -- blissful ignorance into knowledge, much like Adam and Eve taking a bite of the apple. But it is not the extremes of good and evil. It is something greyer, more ambiguous. This dichotomy is best represented of William Blake’s Songs of Innocence and Songs of Experience. “The Innocence poems were the products of a mind in a state of innocence and an imagination unspoiled by stains of worldliness. Public events and private emotions soon converted Innocence into Experience, producing Blake’s preoccupation with the problem of good and evil.”1 For Blake, there are advantages to being on each end of the spectrum, but they are equal. Being innocent allows for a childlike view, full of wonder, of the world. But it also allows for irony to be present. An innocent view of a terrible thing points out just how awful it is. Perkins writes, “The state of innocence does not represent Blake’s final conception of Man’s highest joy.
    [Show full text]
  • Hitchcock's Motifs 2005
    Repositorium für die Medienwissenschaft Michael Walker Hitchcock's Motifs 2005 https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/4105 Veröffentlichungsversion / published version Buch / book Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Walker, Michael: Hitchcock's Motifs. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press 2005 (Film Culture in Transition). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/4105. Erstmalig hier erschienen / Initial publication here: http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/35146 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Creative Commons - This document is made available under a creative commons - Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell 3.0/ Lizenz zur Verfügung Attribution - Non Commercial 3.0/ License. For more information gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu dieser Lizenz finden Sie hier: see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ * pb ‘Hitchcock’ 09-09-2005 13:17 Pagina 1 Among the abundant Alfred Hitchcock litera- ture, Hitchcock’s Motifs has found a fresh angle. Starting from recurring objects, settings, char- MOTIFS MICHAEL WALKER HITCHCOCK’S acter-types and events, Michael Walker tracks FILM FILM some forty motifs, themes and clusters across the whole of Hitchcock’s work, including not CULTURE CULTURE only all his 52 extant feature films but also IN TRANSITION IN TRANSITION representative episodes from his TV series. Con- nections and deeper inflections that Hitchcock fans may have long sensed or suspected can now be seen for what they are: an intricately spun web of cross-references which gives this Hitchcock’sHitchcock’s unique artist’s work the depth, consistency and resonance that justifies Hitchcock’s place as probably the best known film director ever.
    [Show full text]