The Piggot Site (31CR14), Carteret County, North Carolina

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Piggot Site (31CR14), Carteret County, North Carolina ABSTRACT GARRETT, AMY. Osteological Analysis of a Late Woodland North Carolina Ossuary: The Piggot Site (31CR14), Carteret County, North Carolina. (Under the direction of Dr. Ann Ross). This study represents a comprehensive osteological analysis of the Piggot ossuary site (31CR14) from coastal North Carolina. Calibrated radiocarbon dating indicates an age of AD 1420-1640, situating the site within the Late Woodland/Protohistoric period. The skeletal remains were not processed or catalogued prior to this investigation. The primary goal of this study is to determine the demographic profile of the site—including age and sex distributions and most likely number of individuals (MLNI)—as part of the inventorying process. This investigation additionally documents all evident pathologies in order to interpret overall levels of health and nutrition. Biological sex is assessed for adults through pelvic and cranial morphology. Adult ages are determined by dental and pelvic degeneration, as well as Lamendin et al.’s (1992) aging technique based on dental transparency. For subadults, age is estimated through dental development and maximum lengths of long bones. Results indicate the Piggot ossuary originally comprised 121 individuals, containing an incomplete, non- representative population with a significantly higher-than-expected percentage of subadults (79%). Prominent pathologies include osteoarthritis, periostitis, osteomyelitis, and probable scurvy. Results also indicate the presence of congenital syphilis. However, due to the protohistoric nature of this sample, results of this investigation cannot definitively contribute to the debate concerning the origins of venereal syphilis in the New World. The pathological evidence along with an overnummeration of subadults suggests the sample could represent a Native American population experiencing the first wave of disease resulting from European contact. © Copyright 2012 by Amy Leigh Garrett All Rights Reserved Osteological Analysis of a Late Woodland North Carolina Ossuary: The Piggot Site (31CR14), Carteret County, North Carolina by Amy Garrett A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Anthropology Raleigh, North Carolina 2012 APPROVED BY: _______________________________ ______________________________ Dr. Ann Ross Dr. Kevin Donald Committee Chair ________________________________ ________________________________ Dr. Troy Case Dr. Scott Fitzpatrick ii BIOGRAPHY Amy Garrett spent her childhood in Danville, Virginia. Growing up she aspired to be an archaeologist, and she followed this career path into adulthood. Amy completed her Bachelor of Arts degree in Anthropology at the University of Mary Washington in Fredericksburg, Virginia. During this time, she participated in an archaeological field school at Werowocomoco, the political center of the Powhatan chiefdom. This experience strengthened her love for archaeology and also incited an interest in Native American studies. After gaining two years of archaeological experience as a field technician at a Cultural Resource Management (CRM) firm, she decided to pursue a graduate degree at North Carolina State University. Amy concentrated in bioarchaeology and was able to combine her interest in archaeology and Native American studies through her thesis on a Late Woodland Algonkian ossuary. She is currently a candidate for the Master of Arts degree in Anthropology under the direction of Dr. Ann Ross. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I would like to thank my committee members for their support, encouragement, and constructive criticism throughout this entire process. I would like to thank Dr. Ross for providing me with the means to study the collection—volunteering her lab for its storage and analysis and essentially allowing me to ‘camp out’ there until its completion. And also, a big thanks for transporting my collection to the lab when I was in Thailand, carrying 16 heavy boxes of bones across the city in the middle of a very hot summer. I especially want to thank Dr. Donald for all his help with the collection over the summer, acting as my guide through the curation process. Many tedious hours were spent weighing bone fragments and writing cataloguing cards, and for that I am exceedingly grateful. Thanks to Dr. Case for his encouragement and input throughout this process. When I would begin to feel completely overwhelmed during the four month processing phase, he helped me find my focus and determination. I would also like to thank Dr. Fitzpatrick for all his archaeological input, and for his expert advice on radiocarbon dating. I would like to thank my friends and family for their love, support, and understanding. Thanks especially for bearing with me as I have been, on the whole, MIA during this time. I want to thank my dog Nelly for forcing me to take study breaks every so often (she didn’t know it, but those games of tug-of-war really helped). Finally, I want to thank Cedric for his constant, unwavering support and encouragement. He is my foundation and best friend, and has helped me stay sane and centered these past two years of graduate school. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................. VII LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................... VIII CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 2 – PREHISTORIC CULTURAL SEQUENCE ............................................................. 4 PALEO-INDIAN PERIOD ................................................................................................. 4 ARCHAIC PERIOD ......................................................................................................... 5 WOODLAND PERIOD ..................................................................................................... 8 LATE WOODLAND CAROLINA ALGONKIANS .............................................................. 16 CHAPTER 3 – OSSUARY BURIAL ......................................................................................... 24 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................ 25 REGIONAL ANALYSES ................................................................................................ 27 NORTH CAROLINA OSSUARY INTERMENT .................................................................. 31 ANALYTICAL MEASURES ............................................................................................ 34 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................... 37 CHAPTER 4 – PALEOPATHOLOGY ....................................................................................... 38 ARTHRITIS .................................................................................................................. 39 FRACTURES ................................................................................................................ 40 INFECTION .................................................................................................................. 41 CONGENITAL DISORDERS ........................................................................................... 43 CIRCULATORY DISTURBANCES ................................................................................... 44 TUMORS AND TUMOR-LIKE PROCESSES OF BONE ...................................................... 45 METABOLIC DISORDERS ............................................................................................. 45 ENDOCRINE DISTURBANCES ....................................................................................... 47 HEMATOLOGIC DISORDERS ........................................................................................ 48 MISCELLANEOUS ........................................................................................................ 49 CHAPTER 5 – MATERIALS AND METHODS .......................................................................... 50 MATERIALS ........................................................................................................................ 50 THE PIGGOT OSSUARY ............................................................................................... 50 ARTIFACT ASSEMBLAGE ............................................................................................ 53 METHODS .......................................................................................................................... 58 CURATION .................................................................................................................. 58 MOST LIKELY NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS ................................................................... 60 AGE ESTIMATION ....................................................................................................... 62 SEX ESTIMATION ........................................................................................................ 65 PALEOPATHOLOGY ..................................................................................................... 66 PALEODEMOGRAPHY .................................................................................................. 67 v CHAPTER 6 – RESULTS ......................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • {TEXTBOOK} Missing in Action
    MISSING IN ACTION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Francis Bergèse | 48 pages | 09 Feb 2017 | CINEBOOK LTD | 9781849183437 | English | Ashford, United Kingdom Missing in Action () - IMDb Normalization of U. Considerable speculation and investigation has gone to a theory that a significant number of these men were captured as prisoners of war by Communist forces in the two countries and kept as live prisoners after the war's conclusion for the United States in Its unanimous conclusion found "no compelling evidence that proves that any American remains alive in captivity in Southeast Asia. This missing in action issue has been a highly emotional one to those involved, and is often considered the last depressing, divisive aftereffect of the Vietnam War. To skeptics, "live prisoners" is a conspiracy theory unsupported by motivation or evidence, and the foundation for a cottage industry of charlatans who have preyed upon the hopes of the families of the missing. As two skeptics wrote in , "The conspiracy myth surrounding the Americans who remained missing after Operation Homecoming in had evolved to baroque intricacy. By , there were thousands of zealots—who believed with cultlike fervor that hundreds of American POWs had been deliberately and callously abandoned in Indochina after the war, that there was a vast conspiracy within the armed forces and the executive branch—spanning five administrations—to cover up all evidence of this betrayal, and that the governments of Communist Vietnam and Laos continued to hold an unspecified number of living American POWs, despite their adamant denials of this charge. It is only hard evidence of a national disgrace: American prisoners were left behind at the end of the Vietnam War.
    [Show full text]
  • REFLECTION of PEACE Lined by Blocks of Granite That Hold the Names of Doves of Peace Reach to the Sky on Top of the Emerald the Deceased
    OSSUARY The Ossuary at Roselawn has a spiraling pathway REFLECTION OF PEACE lined by blocks of granite that hold the names of Doves of peace reach to the sky on top of the emerald the deceased. The ashes are placed in a co-mingle green granite circular columbarium. Surrounded by container. beautiful gardens and benches. Ossuary In Ground Burial Lots for 2 Cremains $895 Reflection of Peace* Co-Mingle Cremation Burial $3,800 Includes Interment, Marker and Inscription COMMUNITY Includes Placement and Inscription MAUSOLEUM Niche for 2 Cremains Reflection of Peace* Beautifully constructed bronze niche wall depicting $3,600 - $4,200 a Northern Minnesota Lake. This sculpture is said to Includes Placement and Inscription be the Largest Bronze Niche Wall in the World. See the front cover picture to view the entire mausoleum. Bronze Cremation Niche for 2 Cremains Roselawn Community Mausoleum* GARDEN OF $6,400 - $6,800 Includes Placement and Inscription REMEMBRANCE Price depends on row chosen Set into an embankment and accented with flowering topiary planters. It is a true work of beauty. And will SPLIT ROCK GARDEN forever be a peaceful resting place. Located near the Historic Roselawn Chapel, this In Ground Burial Lots for 2 Cremains limestone wall is the backdrop for the newest cremation columbarium. Serene pond, gardens and sculpture Garden of Remembrance* add to the peaceful resting place. $4,600 Includes Interment, Marker and Inscription In Ground Burial Lots for 2 Cremains Split Rock Garden* $3,800 Wall Niche for 2 Cremains Includes Interment, Marker and Inscription Garden of Remembrance* HISTORICAL CHAPEL $4,400 - $5,000 Niche for 2 Cremains Split Rock Garden* Our historic chapel, designed by renowned architect Includes Placement and Inscription $3,800 - $4,400 Cass Gilbert, may be reserved by lot owners for Price depends on row chosen Includes Placement and Inscription funerals and memorial services.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Ethics and Human Rights of the Dead
    genealogy Article Heritage Ethics and Human Rights of the Dead Kelsey Perreault ID The Institute for Comparative Studies in Literature, Art, and Culture, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada; [email protected] Received: 1 May 2018; Accepted: 13 July 2018; Published: 17 July 2018 Abstract: Thomas Laqueur argues that the work of the dead is carried out through the living and through those who remember, honour, and mourn. Further, he maintains that the brutal or careless disposal of the corpse “is an attack of extreme violence”. To treat the dead body as if it does not matter or as if it were ordinary organic matter would be to deny its humanity. From Laqueur’s point of view, it is inferred that the dead are believed to have rights and dignities that are upheld through the rituals, practices, and beliefs of the living. The dead have always held a place in the space of the living, whether that space has been material and visible, or intangible and out of sight. This paper considers ossuaries as a key site for investigating the relationships between the living and dead. Holding the bones of hundreds or even thousands of bodies, ossuaries represent an important tradition in the cultural history of the dead. Ossuaries are culturally constituted and have taken many forms across the globe, although this research focuses predominantly on Western European ossuary practices and North American Indigenous ossuaries. This paper will examine two case studies, the Sedlec Ossuary (Kutna Hora, Czech Republic) and Taber Hill Ossuary (Toronto, ON, Canada), to think through the rights of the dead at heritage sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Facets of the History of New Bern
    Swiss American Historical Society Review Volume 45 Number 3 Article 4 11-2009 Facets of the History of New Bern Michael Hill North Carolina Office of Archives and History Ansley Wegner North Carolina Office of Archives and History Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/sahs_review Part of the European History Commons, and the European Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Hill, Michael and Wegner, Ansley (2009) "Facets of the History of New Bern," Swiss American Historical Society Review: Vol. 45 : No. 3 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/sahs_review/vol45/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Swiss American Historical Society Review by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Hill and Wegner: Facets of the History of New Bern Facets of the History of New Bern Michael Hill and Ansley Wegner North Carolina Office of Archives and History Survival of New Bern and Its Contribution to the Growth of a New State and Nation The affable climate and geography of the coastal plain of North Carolina made it an attractive settlement point for incoming Europeans. The land is relatively flat, and the rich soils are ideal for agriculture. The mild climate allowed for longer growing seasons, and a number of wide, slow­ moving rivers provided both navigation and a food source. Indeed, John Lawson, the British naturalist and explorer, described North Carolina as "a country, whose inhabitants may enjoy a life of the greatest ease and satisfaction, and pass away their hours in solid contentment." Old New Bern 57 Published by BYU ScholarsArchive, 2009 1 Swiss American Historical Society Review, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuscarora Trails: Indian Migrations, War, and Constructions of Colonial Frontiers
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2007 Tuscarora trails: Indian migrations, war, and constructions of colonial frontiers Stephen D. Feeley College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Feeley, Stephen D., "Tuscarora trails: Indian migrations, war, and constructions of colonial frontiers" (2007). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539623324. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-4nn0-c987 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Tuscarora Trails: Indian Migrations, War, and Constructions of Colonial Frontiers Volume I Stephen Delbert Feeley Norcross, Georgia B.A., Davidson College, 1996 M.A., The College of William and Mary, 2000 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the College of William and Mary in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Lyon Gardiner Tyler Department of History The College of William and Mary May, 2007 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. APPROVAL SHEET This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Stephen Delbert F eele^ -^ Approved by the Committee, January 2007 MIL James Axtell, Chair Daniel K. Richter McNeil Center for Early American Studies 11 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • I Ana Rafaela Ferraz Ferreira Body Disposal in Portugal: Current
    Ana Rafaela Ferraz Ferreira Body disposal in Portugal: Current practices and potential adoption of alkaline hydrolysis and natural burial as sustainable alternatives Dissertação de Candidatura ao grau de Mestre em Medicina Legal submetida ao Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar da Universidade do Porto. Orientador: Prof. Doutor Francisco Queiroz Categoria: Coordenador Adjunto do Grupo de Investigação “Heritage, Culture and Tourism” Afiliação: CEPESE – Centro de Estudos da População, Economia e Sociedade da Universidade do Porto i This page intentionally left blank. ii “We are eternal! But we will not last!” in Welcome To Night Vale iii This page intentionally left blank. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My sincerest thank you to my supervisor, Francisco Queiroz, who went above and beyond to answer my questions (and to ask new ones). This work would have been poorer and uglier and a lot less composed if you hadn’t been here to help me direct it. Thank you. My humblest thank you to my mother, father, and sister, for their unending support and resilience in enduring an entire year of Death-Related Fun Facts (and perhaps a month of grumpiness as the deadline grew closer and greater and fiercer in the horizon). We’ve pulled through. Thank you. My clumsiest thank you to my people (aka friends), for that same aforementioned resilience, but also for the constant willingness to bear ideological arms and share my anger at the little things gone wrong. I don’t know what I would have done without the 24/7 online support group that is our friendship. Thank you. Last, but not least, my endless thank you to Professor Fernando Pedro Figueiredo and Professor Maria José Pinto da Costa, for their attention to detail during the incredible learning moment that was my thesis examination.
    [Show full text]
  • The James Ossuary: the Earliest Witness to Jesus and His Family?
    The James Ossuary: The Earliest Witness to Jesus and His Family? Joseph M. Holden, Ph.D. President, Veritas International University One of the earliest and most important discoveries relating to the historicity of Jesus and members of his family is the limestone bone-box (called an ossuary) made known to the public in October, 2002. Ossuaries were used by Israel from about the second century BC until the fall of Jerusalem in AD 70. Over ten thousand such ossuaries have been discovered but only about one hundred contain inscriptions. Of these, only two have an identification similar to the one etched in the now famous and somewhat controversial “James Ossuary.” The entire Aramaic inscription reads, “Jacob (James), son of Joseph, brother of Jesus” (Ya’akov bar Yosef akhui di Yeshua). If, in fact, the inscription in its entirety is recognized as authentic (which we believe to be the case), we have clear first-century AD testimony of Jesus, his father Joseph, and brother James. James (Ya’akov) is given in the Gospel accounts as a brother of Jesus (Mt. 13:55), but he is also one of the most important figures in the New Testament. The book of Acts reveals that he was the pastor of the Jerusalem church, moderator of the Jerusalem Council in Acts 15, and penned the epistle of James. James is also spoken of a number of times in the writings of Josephus. He was put to death by certain Jewish leaders in AD 62, so if the James Ossuary is the one in which his bones were placed, then the dating of the bone-box would be approximately AD 62-63, allowing time for the reburial of the bones after the decomposition of the flesh, according to Jewish practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Rituals of Death and Dying in Modern and Ancient Greece
    Rituals of Death and Dying in Modern and Ancient Greece Rituals of Death and Dying in Modern and Ancient Greece: Writing History from a Female Perspective By Evy Johanne Håland Rituals of Death and Dying in Modern and Ancient Greece: Writing History from a Female Perspective, by Evy Johanne Håland This book first published 2014 Cambridge Scholars Publishing 12 Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2XX, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2014 by Evy Johanne Håland All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-6127-8, ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-6127-4 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures........................................................................................... viii A Note on Transliteration ......................................................................... xiii Acknowledgements ................................................................................... xv Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 Chapter One ................................................................................................. 6 Death Rituals and the Cult of the Dead in Greece From death in general to Greek women and death in particular
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    The Southern Algonquians and Their Neighbours DAVID H. PENTLAND University of Manitoba INTRODUCTION At least fifty named Indian groups are known to have lived in the area south of the Mason-Dixon line and north of the Creek and the other Muskogean tribes. The exact number and the specific names vary from one source to another, but all agree that there were many different tribes in Maryland, Virginia and the Carolinas during the colonial period. Most also agree that these fifty or more tribes all spoke languages that can be assigned to just three language families: Algonquian, Iroquoian, and Siouan. In the case of a few favoured groups there is little room for debate. It is certain that the Powhatan spoke an Algonquian language, that the Tuscarora and Cherokee are Iroquoians, and that the Catawba speak a Siouan language. In other cases the linguistic material cannot be positively linked to one particular political group. There are several vocabularies of an Algonquian language that are labelled Nanticoke, but Ives Goddard (1978:73) has pointed out that Murray collected his "Nanticoke" vocabulary at the Choptank village on the Eastern Shore, and Heckeweld- er's vocabularies were collected from refugees living in Ontario. Should the language be called Nanticoke, Choptank, or something else? And if it is Nanticoke, did the Choptank speak the same language, a different dialect, a different Algonquian language, or some completely unrelated language? The basic problem, of course, is the lack of reliable linguistic data from most of this region. But there are additional complications. It is known that some Indians were bilingual or multilingual (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuscarora-War.Pdf
    Cultures Clash CHERAW WEAPEMEOC SAPONI (P (POTESKEET) Albemarle County ASQUOT European Settlement Pushes (YEOPIM the Tuscarora Nation to the Roanoke ANK) SHAKORI CHOWANOC ) Breaking Point River ENO R. Edenton Yadkin UPPER 1710 Albemarle Sound KEYAUWEE SISSIPAHAW TUSCARORA F r e n c MORATOK (ROANOAK) h Catawba B SECOTAN r o Bath County a d (MACHAPUNGO) R Torhunta CATAWBA Cape Ft. Neoheroka Bath i V v V V V Ft. Hancock e 1690 r R. Fear CHEROKEE Catechna Pamlico R. R. d (HATTERAS) TUSCARORA POMOUIK un SUGEREE Ft. So Barnwell Barnwell New Bern lico (Narhantes) am WAXHAW and 1710 P Cape T Moore rent R. R. Hatteras Expeditions Neuse WATEREE NEUSIOK (COREE) Beaufort 1715 THE TUSCARORA WAR — Main Events Cape Lookout 1710 WACCAMAW Colonial town of New Bern displaces Tuscarora village of Chattoka Clarendon County PRINCIPAL INDIAN TRIBES Wilmington From The Way We Lived in North Carolina 1711 Ca. 1600-1700, in addition to 1733 © 2003 The University of North Carolina Press Mid-September — John Lawson is executed near the village of Catechna Tuscarora. (Eastern tribes largely CAPE FEAR Map © North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources September 22 — Tuscarora Indians, in alliance with members of displaced displaced by white settlers.) All rights reserved. coastal tribes, attack colonists along the Neuse, Pamlico, and Trent Rivers Cape Fear October 27 —South Carolina resolves to raise troops to fight the Tuscaroras Forts Brunswick Town 1725 Indian Woods 1712 Reservation established in 1717 January 28 — The Barnwell Expedition crosses the Cape Fear River for Tuscarora remaining in North Carolina following the war of January 30 — Barnwell’s force destroys the Tuscarora village of Narhantes 1711-1713.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstruction of Demographic Profiles from Ossuary Skeletal Samples
    Reconstruction of Demographic Profiles from Ossuary Skeletal Samples A CASE STUDY FROM THE TIDEWATER POTOMAC Douglas H. Ubelaker SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ANTHROPOLOGY NUMBER 18 SERIAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION The emphasis upon publications as a means of diffusing knowledge was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. In his formal plan for the Insti­ tution, Joseph Henry articulated a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This keynote of basic research has been adhered to over the years in the issuance of thousands of titles in serial publications under the Smithsonian imprint, com­ mencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Annals of Flight Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes original articles and monographs dealing with the research and collections of its several museums and offices and of profes­ sional colleagues at other institutions of learning. These papers report newly acquired facts, synoptic interpretations of data, or original theory in specialized fields. These publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, laboratories, and other in­ terested institutions and specialists throughout the world. Individual copies may be obtained from the Smithsonian Institution Press as long as stocks are available.
    [Show full text]
  • Chestnut Grove Memorial Garden Designs
    Chestnut Grove Metro cemetery policies Metro’s cemeteries are valued as sacred places and Memorial Garden are available to the public for casket burial, urn placement, grave visitation, reflection and at Lone Fir Cemetery historical research. General visiting hours 7 a.m. to sunset About Metro Photography and videography Metro brings people together from across Restricted to landscape, nature and architectural greater Portland to preserve farms and Chestnut Grove Memorial Garden designs. Commercial uses or images for forests, protect water and wildlife, and create opened in 2013 for the placement of publication require special use permits from communities people want to call home. cremated remains in Lone Fir Cemetery. oregonmetro.gov/specialuse Led by an elected Council, this unique The memorial garden is situated near Burial services hours government gives Oregonians a voice in land the middle of the cemetery, north of the 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. Monday to Friday for interments/ and transportation, garbage and recycling, Macleay Mausoleum and west of the inurnments, except legal holidays. Other parks and nature, the Oregon Zoo, and arrangements require an additional fee. All Soldier’s Monument. landmark places – like Arlene Schnitzer services require at least a 48-hour notice. Concert Hall and Lone Fir cemetery. Lone Fir Cemetery, nestled in the heart Flowers of Southeast Portland, is one of the Fresh flowers are permitted for three weeks or city’s oldest cemeteries and the area’s until they wither. Artificial plants are prohibited March 1 to Nov. 15, except for Memorial Day. second largest arboretum. Over 30,000 people are buried here, including some Prohibited of the city’s most notable residents and Fences and enclosures around graves, plantings of any kind, mementos or personal property on historical figures.
    [Show full text]