FROGLOG Newsletter of the Declining Amphibian Populations Task Force
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chiricahua Leopard Frog (Rana Chiricahuensis)
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Chiricahua Leopard Frog (Rana chiricahuensis) Final Recovery Plan April 2007 CHIRICAHUA LEOPARD FROG (Rana chiricahuensis) RECOVERY PLAN Southwest Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and are sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, state agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director, or Director, as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature citation of this document should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007. Chiricahua Leopard Frog (Rana chiricahuensis) Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southwest Region, Albuquerque, NM. 149 pp. + Appendices A-M. Additional copies may be obtained from: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Field Office Southwest Region 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 500 Gold Avenue, S.W. -
Darwin Initiative for the Survival of Species Final Report 1. Darwin
Final Report on The Atelopus Initiative: Conserving Endangered Tropical Andean Amphibians Darwin Initiative for the Survival of Species Final Report 1. Darwin Project Information Project Reference No. 13-017 (formerly 268) Project title The Atelopus Initiative: Conserving Endangered Tropical Andean Amphibians Country Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Perú and Bolivia UK Contractor Conservation International-UK Partner Organisation (s) THE ATELOPUS INITIATIVE is a multi-national partnership of herpetologists from the following institutions: Conservation International, The Natural History Museum, IUCN, NatureServe, and many US, European and Andean institutions. Darwin Grant Value £ 186,695 Start/End date April 1, 2004 – March 31, 2007 Project website www.andescbc.org/atelopus Author(s), date Ariadne Angulo, José Vicente Rodríguez-Mahecha, Patricio Jarrin, Robert Bensted-Smith 2. Project Background/Rationale • Describe the location and circumstances of the project The Atelopus Initiative is a regional project funded by a generous grant by the Darwin Initiative (DI), encompassing the five tropical Andean nations of Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia. Following the results of the Global Amphibian Assessment (GAA) and the National Assessment processes developed in Venezuela, Colombia and Peru, which found that almost one third of all known amphibian species are currently considered to be threatened, the project team proposed the Atelopus Initiative as a response to address the amphibian population declines and extinction crisis in the tropical Andes. The crisis is of special concern in the region, given that it is considered to be a biodiversity hotspot and epicentre of amphibian richness especially in he upper Amazon basin. 1 Conservation International Final Report on The Atelopus Initiative: Conserving Endangered Tropical Andean Amphibians • What was the problem that the project aimed to address? The project aimed to address the amphibian population declines and extinction crisis in the tropical Andes Countries. -
Catalogue of the Amphibians of Venezuela: Illustrated and Annotated Species List, Distribution, and Conservation 1,2César L
Mannophryne vulcano, Male carrying tadpoles. El Ávila (Parque Nacional Guairarepano), Distrito Federal. Photo: Jose Vieira. We want to dedicate this work to some outstanding individuals who encouraged us, directly or indirectly, and are no longer with us. They were colleagues and close friends, and their friendship will remain for years to come. César Molina Rodríguez (1960–2015) Erik Arrieta Márquez (1978–2008) Jose Ayarzagüena Sanz (1952–2011) Saúl Gutiérrez Eljuri (1960–2012) Juan Rivero (1923–2014) Luis Scott (1948–2011) Marco Natera Mumaw (1972–2010) Official journal website: Amphibian & Reptile Conservation amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 13(1) [Special Section]: 1–198 (e180). Catalogue of the amphibians of Venezuela: Illustrated and annotated species list, distribution, and conservation 1,2César L. Barrio-Amorós, 3,4Fernando J. M. Rojas-Runjaic, and 5J. Celsa Señaris 1Fundación AndígenA, Apartado Postal 210, Mérida, VENEZUELA 2Current address: Doc Frog Expeditions, Uvita de Osa, COSTA RICA 3Fundación La Salle de Ciencias Naturales, Museo de Historia Natural La Salle, Apartado Postal 1930, Caracas 1010-A, VENEZUELA 4Current address: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Río Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Laboratório de Sistemática de Vertebrados, Av. Ipiranga 6681, Porto Alegre, RS 90619–900, BRAZIL 5Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Altos de Pipe, apartado 20632, Caracas 1020, VENEZUELA Abstract.—Presented is an annotated checklist of the amphibians of Venezuela, current as of December 2018. The last comprehensive list (Barrio-Amorós 2009c) included a total of 333 species, while the current catalogue lists 387 species (370 anurans, 10 caecilians, and seven salamanders), including 28 species not yet described or properly identified. Fifty species and four genera are added to the previous list, 25 species are deleted, and 47 experienced nomenclatural changes. -
Petition to List the Relict Leopard Frog (Rana Onca) As an Endangered Species Under the Endangered Species Act
BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR PETITION TO LIST THE RELICT LEOPARD FROG (RANA ONCA) AS AN ENDANGERED SPECIES UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE PETITIONERS May 8, 2002 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The relict leopard frog (Rana onca) has the dubious distinction of being one of the first North American amphibians thought to have become extinct. Although known to have inhabited at least 64 separate locations, the last historical collections of the species were in the 1950s and this frog was only recently rediscovered at 8 (of the original 64) locations in the early 1990s. This extremely endangered amphibian is now restricted to only 6 localities (a 91% reduction from the original 64 locations) in two disjunct areas within the Lake Mead National Recreation Area in Nevada. The relict leopard frog historically occurred in springs, seeps, and wetlands within the Virgin, Muddy, and Colorado River drainages, in Utah, Nevada, and Arizona. The Vegas Valley leopard frog, which once inhabited springs in the Las Vegas, Nevada area (and is probably now extinct), may eventually prove to be synonymous with R. onca. Relict leopard frogs were recently discovered in eight springs in the early 1990s near Lake Mead and along the Virgin River. The species has subsequently disappeared from two of these localities. Only about 500 to 1,000 adult frogs remain in the population and none of the extant locations are secure from anthropomorphic events, thus putting the species at an almost guaranteed risk of extinction. The relict leopard frog has likely been extirpated from Utah, Arizona, and from the Muddy River drainage in Nevada, and persists in only 9% of its known historical range. -
Vocalizations of Eight Species of Atelopus (Anura: Bufonidae) with Comments on Communication in the Genus
Copeia, 1990(3), pp. 631-643 Vocalizations of Eight Species of Atelopus (Anura: Bufonidae) With Comments on Communication in the Genus REGINALD B. COCROFT, ROY W. MCDIARMID, ALAN P. JASLOW AND PEDRO M. RUIZ-CARRANZA Vocalizations of frogs of the genus Atelopus include three discrete types of signals: pulsed calls, pure tone calls, and short calls. Repertoire composition is conservative across species. Repertoires of most species whose calls have been recorded contain two or three of these identifiable call types. Within a call type, details of call structure are very similar across species. This apparent lack of divergence in calls may be related to the rarity of sympatry among species of Atelopus and to the relative importance of visual communication in their social interactions. COMMUNICATION in frogs of the genus lopus by comparing the structure and behavioral Atelopus has been httle studied despite sev- context, where available, of calls of these species eral unique features of their biology that make with calls of other species reported in the lit- them an important comparative system in light erature. of the extensive work on other species of an- METHODS urans (Littlejohn, 1977; Wells, 1977; Gerhardt, 1988). First, the auditory system oí Atelopus is Calls were analyzed using a Kay Digital Sona- highly modified, and most species lack external Graph 7800, a Data 6000 Waveform Analyzer and middle ears (McDiarmid, 1971). Second, in with a model 610 plug-in digitizer, and a Mul- contrast to most anurans, species oiAtelopus are tigon Uniscan II real-time analyzer. Call fre- diurnal and often brightly colored, and visual quencies were measured from waveform and communication plays an important role in the Fourier transform analyses; pulse rates and call social behavior of at least some species (Jaslow, lengths were measured from waveform analyses 1979; Crump, 1988). -
Comparative Osteology and Evolution of the Lungless Salamanders, Family Plethodontidae David B
COMPARATIVE OSTEOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF THE LUNGLESS SALAMANDERS, FAMILY PLETHODONTIDAE DAVID B. WAKE1 ABSTRACT: Lungless salamanders of the family Plethodontidae comprise the largest and most diverse group of tailed amphibians. An evolutionary morphological approach has been employed to elucidate evolutionary rela tionships, patterns and trends within the family. Comparative osteology has been emphasized and skeletons of all twenty-three genera and three-fourths of the one hundred eighty-three species have been studied. A detailed osteological analysis includes consideration of the evolution of each element as well as the functional unit of which it is a part. Functional and developmental aspects are stressed. A new classification is suggested, based on osteological and other char acters. The subfamily Desmognathinae includes the genera Desmognathus, Leurognathus, and Phaeognathus. Members of the subfamily Plethodontinae are placed in three tribes. The tribe Hemidactyliini includes the genera Gyri nophilus, Pseudotriton, Stereochilus, Eurycea, Typhlomolge, and Hemidac tylium. The genera Plethodon, Aneides, and Ensatina comprise the tribe Pleth odontini. The highly diversified tribe Bolitoglossini includes three super genera. The supergenera Hydromantes and Batrachoseps include the nominal genera only. The supergenus Bolitoglossa includes Bolitoglossa, Oedipina, Pseudoeurycea, Chiropterotriton, Parvimolge, Lineatriton, and Thorius. Manculus is considered to be congeneric with Eurycea, and Magnadig ita is congeneric with Bolitoglossa. Two species are assigned to Typhlomolge, which is recognized as a genus distinct from Eurycea. No. new information is available concerning Haptoglossa. Recognition of a family Desmognathidae is rejected. All genera are defined and suprageneric groupings are defined and char acterized. Range maps are presented for all genera. Relationships of all genera are discussed. -
Results of the Global Amphibian Assessment for Bolivia
Results of the Global Amphibian Assessment for Bolivia Diversity Number of Rank in Latin World Rank2 Percentage of Species in Bolivia America and the the World’s Caribbean1 Diversity All Amphibians 201 7 15 3.5 % Frogs & Toads 197 7 14 3.9 % Salamanders 1 13 68 0.2 % Caecilians 3 11 20 1.8 % 1 Out of 44 countries and territories. 2 Out of 192 countries and territories. Threatened Species (Threatened species are in one of the categories in italics.) IUCN Categories Number of Species in IUCN Categories Number of Species in Bolivia Bolivia Extinct 0 Near Threatened 6 Critically Endangered 5 Least Concern 161 Endangered 6 Data Deficient 13 Vulnerable 10 Number and percent of Bolivian species that are threatened: 21 (10%) Extinct Species: none Species that are Critically Endangered and possibly extinct (species that are missing but for which sufficient information is lacking to declare them as extinct): Frogs: Gastrotheca lauzuricae, Hyla chlorostea, Eleutherodactylus zongoensis Role of Protected Areas: Of the 21 threatened species in Bolivia, 76% occur in at least one protected area. Local Experts: Steffen Reichle, The Nature Conservancy, TEL (591-3) 348 0766, 348 0767 Claudia Cortez, Colección Boliviana de Fauna, TEL (591-3) 272 1152 For More Information: Dr. Bruce Young, NatureServe, Costa Rica, TEL (506) 645-6231 Global Amphibian Assessment website: www.globalamphibians.org A detailed analysis of the results for the Americas: www.natureserve.org Results of the Global Amphibian Assessment for Bolivia Map of Amphibian Diversity Source: Global Amphibian Assessment Map of the Distribution of Threatened Species Source: Global Amphibian Assessment Results of the Global Amphibian Assessment for Brazil Diversity Number of Rank in Latin World Rank2 Percentage of Species in Brazil America and the the World’s Caribbean1 Diversity All Amphibians 731 1 1 12.7 % Frogs & Toads 704 1 1 13.9 % Salamanders 1 13 68 0.2 % Caecilians 26 2 2 15.5 % 1 Out of 44 countries and territories. -
Synchrotron Microtomography Applied to the Volumetric Analysis of Internal Structures of Thoropa Miliaris Tadpoles G
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Synchrotron microtomography applied to the volumetric analysis of internal structures of Thoropa miliaris tadpoles G. Fidalgo1*, K. Paiva1, G. Mendes1, R. Barcellos1, G. Colaço2, G. Sena1, A. Pickler1, C. L. Mota1, G. Tromba3, L. P. Nogueira4, D. Braz5, H. R. Silva2, M. V. Colaço1 & R. C. Barroso1 Amphibians are models for studying applied ecological issues such as habitat loss, pollution, disease, and global climate change due to their sensitivity and vulnerability to changes in the environment. Developmental series of amphibians are informative about their biology, and X-ray based 3D reconstruction holds promise for quantifying morphological changes during growth—some with a direct impact on the possibility of an experimental investigation on several of the ecological topics listed above. However, 3D resolution and discrimination of their soft tissues have been difcult with traditional X-ray computed tomography, without time-consuming contrast staining. Tomographic data were initially performed (pre-processing and reconstruction) using the open- source software tool SYRMEP Tomo Project. Data processing and analysis of the reconstructed tomography volumes were conducted using the segmentation semi-automatic settings of the software Avizo Fire 8, which provide information about each investigated tissues, organs or bone elements. Hence, volumetric analyses were carried out to quantify the development of structures in diferent tadpole developmental stages. Our work shows that synchrotron X-ray microtomography using phase-contrast mode resolves the edges of the internal tissues (as well as overall tadpole morphology), facilitating the segmentation of the investigated tissues. Reconstruction algorithms and segmentation software played an important role in the qualitative and quantitative analysis of each target structure of the Thoropa miliaris tadpole at diferent stages of development, providing information on volume, shape and length. -
I Online Supplementary Data – Sexual Size Dimorphism in Salamanders
Online Supplementary data – Sexual size dimorphism in salamanders Supplementary data S1. Species data used in this study and references list. Males Females SSD Significant test Ref Species n SVL±SD n SVL±SD Andrias davidianus 2 532.5 8 383.0 -0.280 12 Cryptobranchus alleganiensis 53 277.4±5.2 52 300.9±3.4 0.084 Yes 61 Batrachuperus karlschmidti 10 80.0 10 84.8 0.060 26 Batrachuperus londongensis 20 98.6 10 96.7 -0.019 12 Batrachuperus pinchonii 5 69.6 5 74.6 0.070 26 Batrachuperus taibaiensis 11 92.9±12.1 9 102.1±7.1 0.099 Yes 27 Batrachuperus tibetanus 10 94.5 10 92.8 -0.017 12 Batrachuperus yenyuadensis 10 82.8 10 74.8 -0.096 26 Hynobius abei 24 57.8±2.1 34 55.0±1.2 -0.048 Yes 92 Hynobius amakusaensis 22 75.4±4.8 12 76.5±3.6 0.014 No 93 Hynobius arisanensis 72 54.3±4.8 40 55.2±4.8 0.016 No 94 Hynobius boulengeri 37 83.0±5.4 15 91.5±3.8 0.102 Yes 95 Hynobius formosanus 15 53.0±4.4 8 52.4±3.9 -0.011 No 94 Hynobius fuca 4 50.9±2.8 3 52.8±2.0 0.037 No 94 Hynobius glacialis 12 63.1±4.7 11 58.9±5.2 -0.066 No 94 Hynobius hidamontanus 39 47.7±1.0 15 51.3±1.2 0.075 Yes 96 Hynobius katoi 12 58.4±3.3 10 62.7±1.6 0.073 Yes 97 Hynobius kimurae 20 63.0±1.5 15 72.7±2.0 0.153 Yes 98 Hynobius leechii 70 61.6±4.5 18 66.5±5.9 0.079 Yes 99 Hynobius lichenatus 37 58.5±1.9 2 53.8 -0.080 100 Hynobius maoershanensis 4 86.1 2 80.1 -0.069 101 Hynobius naevius 72.1 76.7 0.063 102 Hynobius nebulosus 14 48.3±2.9 12 50.4±2.1 0.043 Yes 96 Hynobius osumiensis 9 68.4±3.1 15 70.2±3.0 0.026 No 103 Hynobius quelpaertensis 41 52.5±3.8 4 61.3±4.1 0.167 Yes 104 Hynobius -
Insights Into the Natural History of the Endemic Harlequin Toad, Atelopus Laetissimus Ruiz-Carranza, Ardila-Robayo, and Hernánd
Offcial journal website: Amphibian & Reptile Conservation amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 14(1) [General Section]: 29–42 (e221). Insights into the natural history of the endemic Harlequin Toad, Atelopus laetissimus Ruiz-Carranza, Ardila-Robayo, and Hernández-Camacho, 1994 (Anura: Bufonidae), in the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia 1,*Hernán D. Granda-Rodríguez, 2Andrés Camilo Montes-Correa, 3Juan David Jiménez-Bolaño, 4Alberto J. Alaniz, 5Pedro E. Cattan, and 6Patricio Hernáez 1Programa de Ingeniería Ambiental, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad de Cundinamarca, Facatativá, COLOMBIA 2,3Grupo de Investigación en Manejo y Conservación de Fauna, Flora y Ecosistemas Estratégicos Neotropicales (MIKU), Universidad del Magdalena, Santa Marta, COLOMBIA 4Centro de Estudios en Ecología Espacial y Medio Ambiente, Ecogeografía, Santiago, CHILE 5Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, CHILE 6Centro de Estudios Marinos y Limnológicos, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Tarapacá, Arica, CHILE Abstract.—Atelopus laetissimus is a bufonid toad that inhabits the mountainous areas of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta (SNSM), Colombia. This species is endemic and endangered, so information about its ecology and distribution are crucial for the conservation of this toad. Here, the relative abundance, habitat and microhabitat uses, and vocalization of A. laetissimus are described from the San Lorenzo creek in the SNSM, as well as its potential distribution in the SNSM. To this end, 447 individuals were analyzed during several sampling trips from 2010 to 2012. Against expectations, population density was signifcantly higher in the stream than in the riparian forest. Overall, A. laetissimus used seven different diurnal microhabitats, with a high preference for leaf litter substrates and rocks. -
Relict Leopard Frog Monitoring and Management
Relict Leopard Frog Monitoring and Management 2014 Annual Report April 2015 Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program Steering Committee Members Federal Participant Group California Participant Group Bureau of Reclamation California Department of Fish and Wildlife U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service City of Needles National Park Service Coachella Valley Water District Bureau of Land Management Colorado River Board of California Bureau of Indian Affairs Bard Water District Western Area Power Administration Imperial Irrigation District Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Palo Verde Irrigation District Arizona Participant Group San Diego County Water Authority Southern California Edison Company Arizona Department of Water Resources Southern California Public Power Authority Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. The Metropolitan Water District of Southern Arizona Game and Fish Department California Arizona Power Authority Central Arizona Water Conservation District Cibola Valley Irrigation and Drainage District Nevada Participant Group City of Bullhead City City of Lake Havasu City Colorado River Commission of Nevada City of Mesa Nevada Department of Wildlife City of Somerton Southern Nevada Water Authority City of Yuma Colorado River Commission Power Users Electrical District No. 3, Pinal County, Arizona Basic Water Company Golden Shores Water Conservation District Mohave County Water Authority Mohave Valley Irrigation and Drainage District Native American Participant Group Mohave Water Conservation District North Gila Valley Irrigation and Drainage District Hualapai Tribe Town of Fredonia Colorado River Indian Tribes Town of Thatcher Chemehuevi Indian Tribe Town of Wickenburg Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District Unit “B” Irrigation and Drainage District Conservation Participant Group Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation and Drainage District Yuma County Water Users’ Association Ducks Unlimited Yuma Irrigation District Lower Colorado River RC&D Area, Inc. -
Research Article Assessing the Molecular Phylogeny of a Near Extinct Group of Vertebrates: the Neotropical Harlequin Frogs (Bufonidae; Atelopus)
Systematics and Biodiversity (2011), 9(1):45–57 Research Article Assessing the molecular phylogeny of a near extinct group of vertebrates: the Neotropical harlequin frogs (Bufonidae; Atelopus) STEFAN LOTTERS¨ 1,ARIEVANDERMEIJDEN2,LUISA.COLOMA3,RENAUDBOISTEL4,PETERCLOETENS4, RAFFAEL ERNST5,EDGARLEHR6 &MICHAELVEITH1 1Trier University, Department of Biogeography, Universitatsring¨ 15, 54286 Trier, Germany 2CIBIO, Centro de Investigac¸ao˜ em Biodiversidade e Recursos Geneticos,´ Campus Agrario´ de Vairao,˜ 4485-661, Vairao,˜ Portugal 3Centro de Investigacion´ y Conservacion´ de Anfibios, Giovanni Farina 566, San Rafael, Quito, Ecuador 4iPHEP-UMR CNRS 6046, UFR SFA Universite´ de Poitiers, 40 avenue du Recteur Pineau, 86022 Poitiers, France 5Museum of Zoology, Senckenberg Natural History Collections Dresden, A. B. Meyer Building, 01109 Dresden, Germany 6Illinois Wesleyan University, Department of Biology, PO BOX 2900, Bloomington, IL 61702-2900, USA (Received 4 May 2010; revised 17 January 2011; accepted 19 January 2011; printed 30 March 2011) Neotropical harlequin frogs, Atelopus,areaspecies-richbufonidgroup.Atelopus monophyly has been suggested but intergeneric, interspecific and intraspecific relationships are poorly understood. One reason is that morphological characters of harlequin frogs are often difficult to interpret, making species delimitations difficult. Molecular analyses (DNA barcoding, phylogeny) may be helpful but sampling is hampered as most of the more than 100 Atelopus species have undergone severe population declines and many are possibly extinct. We processed mitochondrial DNA (12S and 16S rRNA) of 28 available ingroup samples from a large portion of the genus’ geographic range (Bayesian Inference, Maximum Likelihood). Our samples constitute a monophyletic unit, which is sister to other bufonid genera studied including the Andean genus Osornophryne. In contrast to previous morphological studies, our results suggest that Osornophryne is neither sister to Atelopus nor nested within it.