Inventory and Evaluation of Selected Old Growth Ponderosa Pine Stands, Cottonwood Resource Area, Idaho

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inventory and Evaluation of Selected Old Growth Ponderosa Pine Stands, Cottonwood Resource Area, Idaho INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF SELECTED OLD GROWTH PONDEROSA PINE STANDS, COTTONWOOD RESOURCE AREA, IDAHO by Steven K. Rust Conservation Data Center February, 1998 Idaho Department of Fish and Game Natural Resource Policy Bureau 600 South Walnut, P.O. Box 25 Boise, Idaho 83707 Stephen P. Mealey, Director Cooperative Challenge Cost-Share Project Idaho Department of Fish and Game USDI Bureau of Land Management, Cottonwood Resource Area Abstract Pinus ponderosa is a long-lived, early- to mid-seral species in plant associations within the Abies grandis, Pseudotsuga menziesii, and Pinus ponderosa series. Once abundant and widespread, old growth Pinus ponderosa-dominated forest has declined due to a century of fire exclusion, livestock grazing, and selective harvesting within accessible stands. The loss of seral old growth Pinus ponderosa is a concern for wildlife habitat and maintenance of biological diversity. This report summarizes the inventory of old growth Pinus ponderosa- dominated forest stands located on Bureau of Land Management lands in west central Idaho. A comparison of applicable old growth forest criteria is provided. Old growth forest attributes of stands within the study area typically exceed criteria provided in formal definitions. The ecology and wildlife use of Pinus ponderosa-dominated forest is reviewed in relation to the stands observed within the study area. Additional literary resources, not referred to in the text, are summarized in an annotated and indexed bibliography. Approaches to restoration of old growth stands are identified based on groups of stands with similar growth potential, seral status, and stand structure. The use of non-commercial thinning, followed by pile burning, and prescribed understory burning is identified for many old growth stands within the study area. Old growth sites are prioritized for conservation and restoration activities based of criteria for rarity, richness, representativeness, and viability. Four sites are identified as having the highest priority. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................... 1 Study Area and Methods ................................................ 1 Results and Discussion ................................................. 2 OLD GROWTH FOREST ECOLOGY.................................... 2 Old growth classification and description .............................. 2 Old growth forest dynamics......................................... 3 Wildlife habitat relations ........................................... 5 Grand fir series .................................................. 6 Douglas-fir series ................................................ 8 Ponderosa pine series ............................................ 13 SITE CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION RECOMMENDATIONS......... 14 Stand maintenance and restoration ................................. 14 Site conservation priorities ........................................ 21 Concluding Summary ................................................. 22 Literature Cited ....................................................... 24 Appendix 1. Tables .................................................... 29 Table 1. Pinus ponderosa-dominated old growth sites...................... 30 Table 2. Summary of plant associations observed......................... 31 Table 3. Summary of old growth criteria................................. 32 Table 4. Summary of the applicability of old growth definitions ............... 34 Table 5. Summary of old growth stand structure observed .................. 35 Table 6. Summary of wildlife use of Pinus ponderosa-dominated old growth .... 36 Table 7. Summary of forested stands ................................... 38 Table 8. Summary of the rarity of plant associations observed ............... 41 Table 9. Summary of conservation priority ranking......................... 42 Appendix 2. Figures 1 - 4 ............................................... 43 Figure 1. Stem structure of Abies grandis/Acer glabrum .................... 44 Figure 2. Comparison of Abies grandis/Spiraea betulifolia stands ............. 45 Figure 3. Stem structure observed in Abies grandis/Calamagrostis rubescens...45 Figure 4. Comparison of Pseudotsuga menziesii/Physocarpus malvaceus stands 46 Appendix 3. Annotated Bibliography ....................................... 47 Literary resources .................................................. 47 Keyword index ..................................................... 80 Appendix 4. Site old growth stand summaries and delineations .................. 98 v vi Introduction Pinus ponderosa is a long-lived, early- to mid-seral species in plant associations within the Abies grandis, Pseudotsuga menziesii, and Pinus ponderosa series (Steele et al. 1981; Cooper et al. 1991). In pre- settlement times, frequent, low-intensity fires in Pinus ponderosa-dominated forest maintained relatively open, old growth forest stands (Evans 1991 as cited by Agee 1996; Arno et al. 1995; Crane and Fischer 1986; and many others). Fire played an important ecological role in this vegetation by controlling the density of understory tree regeneration and favoring the growth of relatively few, large, dominant, fire tolerant trees; reducing tree susceptibility to disease; and favoring the growth and diversity of understory herbaceous species (Barrett 1988; Crane and Fischer 1986; Agee 1996). The National Biological Service has identified seral old growth Pinus ponderosa forest as one of the most threatened ecosystems in the United States, with an estimated decline of 70 - 84 % (Noss et al. 1995). Once abundant and widespread (Losensky 1992), old growth Pinus ponderosa-dominated forest has declined due to a century of fire exclusion, livestock grazing, and selective harvesting within accessible stands (Steele et al. 1986; Hamilton 1993; Covington and Moore 1994; Sloan 1994; Agee 1996). The loss of seral old growth Pinus ponderosa is a concern for wildlife habitat and maintenance of biological diversity (Everett et al. 1994; Morgan 1994; Arno et al. 1995; Groves et al, 1997). Given this high level of decline, human activities that influence the distribution, abundance, and quality of old growth Pinus ponderosa- dominated forest must be critically evaluated. Principal old growth forest attributes are the density of large diameter, old trees; the presence of tree decadence; and the presence and size of snags and coarse woody debris. Though these ecological attributes describe the life breath critical to species habitats, they also serve an important administrative function in ongoing debates regarding the management of forested lands. Old growth forest definitions that have potential baring in Idaho are provided by Green et al. (1992), Hamilton (1993), Hopkins et al. (1992a and b), and Williams et al. (1992). Questions that provide the impetus for this study include: What are stand structural conditions of remnant stands of Pinus ponderosa-dominated old growth forest in west central Idaho? Where are the greatest opportunities for the conservation and restoration of Pinus ponderosa-dominated old growth forest? How do old growth definitions - derived from the north, south, and west - apply to stands in west central Idaho? The objectives of the study are: (1) inventory and prioritize sites on Bureau of Land Management lands within west central Idaho for the conservation and restoration of old growth Pinus ponderosa-dominated forest; (2) develop preliminary management guidelines to enhance and protect the biological values of selected stands; and (3) as needed, contribute to the resolution of old growth forest definitions. Study Area and Methods The study area includes Bureau of Land Management lands on the Cottonwood Resource Area, Upper Columbia-Salmon Clearwater Districts, in west central Idaho. Sites with high potential for the conservation or restoration of old growth Pinus ponderosa-dominated forest were identified using aerial photography and existing survey and reconnaissance data. Vegetation stands at each site were delineated based on stand environmental features (topography and elevation) and apparent structure and composition (using aerial photography interpretation). In order to optimize the balance between the geographic scope of the study and the need to acquire quantitative information, the intensity of field reconnaissance efforts were stratified within stand delineations. Quantitative and qualitative data was taken to characterize current stand conditions. Qualitative data consists of descriptive field narratives regarding composition, structure, and function. This data is linked to and supported by quantitative data. Intensive quantitative sampling occurred to best represent site conditions, but was limited to selected reference stands within each site. Both data types are geo- referenced. Page 1 Within selected reference stands nested 0.10 and 0.25 acre fixed area plots were used to sample stand composition and structure and measure environmental parameters. Plots were placed within forest patches that are homogeneous in structure and composition. Habitat type (and phase), tree canopy cover, basic environmental parameters (slope aspect, gradient, and horizon; elevation; and micro- and macro-topography), and fuel class were determined on a standard 0.1 acre circular ecology plot. The density and size distribution of live, standing dead, and dead and down trees were sampled on nested 0.10 and 0.25 acre fixed area plots. Trees with diameter at breast height (dbh) > 5 but <
Recommended publications
  • Final Biological Assessment
    REVISED BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Effects of the Modified Idaho Roadless Rule on Federally Listed Threatened, Endangered, Candidate, and Proposed Species for Terrestrial Wildlife, Aquatics, and Plants September 12, 2008 FINAL BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Effects of the Modified Idaho Roadless Rule on Federally Listed Threatened, Endangered, Candidate, and Proposed Species for Terrestrial Wildlife, Aquatics, and Plants Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................... 1 II. DESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL ACTION .................................................................................................... 3 Purpose and Need..................................................................................................................................3 Description of the Project Area...............................................................................................................4 Modified Idaho Roadless Rule................................................................................................................6 Wild Land Recreation (WLR)...............................................................................................................6 Primitive (PRIM) and Special Areas of Historic and Tribal Significance (SAHTS)..............................7 Backcountry/ Restoration (Backcountry) (BCR)................................................................................10 General Forest, Rangeland,
    [Show full text]
  • Acer Glabrum Var. Douglasii Snowberry
    NATIVE PLANTS/SHRUBS: Saskatoon Serviceberry – Amielanchier alnifolia Oceanspray – Holodiscus discolor Blue Elderberry - Sambucus cerulea Erect, loosely branched shrub up to 15’ tall. Found Usually a shrub or small tree from 10’ to 20’ or Vine Maple - Acer circinatum Large shrubs or small trees up to 40’ tall and 6” in diameter. Occurs on moist, well-drained on well drained to dry sites in the sun and shade more tall. Found on moist, well-drained sites in An erect shrub, or more commonly a helter- sites in the sun or partial shade, from southern from south central California northward to British the sun; from British Columbia south to California, skelter arrangement of crooked branches; Alaska to northwestern California, and east- Columbia, eastward to Idaho. east through Idaho, Utah, and Nevada. up to 20’ tall, or less commonly a small tree ward throughout the Rocky Mountains. Elevational range: sea level to 9,000 feet. 30’ to 40’ in height. Common understory Dull Oregon Grape – Mahonia (Berberis) nervosa species in the West side forests of the Red Elderberry – Sambucus racemosa Pacific Northwest also pioneer species on Oregon Grape – Low, evergreen shrub with pinnately Berberis aquifolium (Tall Oregon Grape) A shrub or small tree from 8’ to 20’ tall. Occurs on cutover and burned-over lands. Found compound leaves; seldom over 30” high. moist, well-drained sites in the sun; most Erect evergreen shrub 3’ to 10’ tall, with dark on moist sites in the sun or shade from Grows on moist, well-drained sites in the sun common on the West Side of the Cascade green glossy leaves.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: a Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators
    USDA United States Department of Agriculture Research Natural Areas on Forest Service National Forest System Lands Rocky Mountain Research Station in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, General Technical Report RMRS-CTR-69 Utah, and Western Wyoming: February 2001 A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and E'ducators Angela G. Evenden Melinda Moeur J. Stephen Shelly Shannon F. Kimball Charles A. Wellner Abstract Evenden, Angela G.; Moeur, Melinda; Shelly, J. Stephen; Kimball, Shannon F.; Wellner, Charles A. 2001. Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-69. Ogden, UT: U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 84 p. This guidebook is intended to familiarize land resource managers, scientists, educators, and others with Research Natural Areas (RNAs) managed by the USDA Forest Service in the Northern Rocky Mountains and lntermountain West. This guidebook facilitates broader recognitionand use of these valuable natural areas by describing the RNA network, past and current research and monitoring, management, and how to use RNAs. About The Authors Angela G. Evenden is biological inventory and monitoring project leader with the National Park Service -NorthernColorado Plateau Network in Moab, UT. She was formerly the Natural Areas Program Manager for the Rocky Mountain Research Station, Northern Region and lntermountain Region of the USDA Forest Service. Melinda Moeur is Research Forester with the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain ResearchStation in Moscow, ID, and one of four Research Natural Areas Coordinators from the Rocky Mountain Research Station. J. Stephen Shelly is Regional Botanist and Research Natural Areas Coordinator with the USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Headquarters Office in Missoula, MT.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Or Suitable Plants City of Mccall
    Native or Suitable Plants City of McCall The following list of plants is presented to assist the developer, business owner, or homeowner in selecting plants for landscaping. The list is by no means complete, but is a recommended selection of plants which are either native or have been successfully introduced to our area. Successful landscaping, however, requires much more than just the selection of plants. Unless you have some experience, it is suggested than you employ the services of a trained or otherwise experienced landscaper, arborist, or forester. For best results it is recommended that careful consideration be made in purchasing the plants from the local nurseries (i.e. Cascade, McCall, and New Meadows). Plants brought in from the Treasure Valley may not survive our local weather conditions, microsites, and higher elevations. Timing can also be a serious consideration as the plants may have already broken dormancy and can be damaged by our late frosts. Appendix B SELECTED IDAHO NATIVE PLANTS SUITABLE FOR VALLEY COUNTY GROWING CONDITIONS Trees & Shrubs Acer circinatum (Vine Maple). Shrub or small tree 15-20' tall, Pacific Northwest native. Bright scarlet-orange fall foliage. Excellent ornamental. Alnus incana (Mountain Alder). A large shrub, useful for mid to high elevation riparian plantings. Good plant for stream bank shelter and stabilization. Nitrogen fixing root system. Alnus sinuata (Sitka Alder). A shrub, 6-1 5' tall. Grows well on moist slopes or stream banks. Excellent shrub for erosion control and riparian restoration. Nitrogen fixing root system. Amelanchier alnifolia (Serviceberry). One of the earlier shrubs to blossom out in the spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho Moose Management Plan 2020-2025
    Idaho Moose Management Plan 2020-2025 DRAFT December 10, 2019 1 This page intentionally left blank. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Shiras Moose (Alces alces shirasi) occur across much of Idaho, except for the southwest corner of the state. Moose are highly valued by both hunters and non-hunters, providing consumptive and non-consumptive opportunities that have economic and aesthetic value. Over the past century their known range has expanded from small areas of northern and eastern Idaho to their current distribution. Population size also increased during this time, likely peaking around the late 1990s or early 2000s. The Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) is concerned that current survey data, anecdotal information and harvest data indicate moose have recently declined in parts of Idaho. Several factors may be impacting moose populations both positively and negatively including predation, habitat change (e.g., roads, development, timber harvest), changing climate, disease or parasites and combinations thereof. IDFG was established to preserve, protect, perpetuate and manage all of Idaho’s fish and wildlife. As such, species management plans are written to set statewide management direction to help fulfill IDFG’s mission. Idaho’s prior moose management plan (Idaho Department of Fish and Game 1990) addressed providing a quality hunting experience, the vulnerability of moose to illegal harvest, protecting their habitat, improving controlled hunt drawing odds and expanding moose populations into suitable ranges. The intent of this revision to the 1990 Moose Management Plan is to provide guidance for IDFG and their partners to implement management actions that will aid in protection and management of moose populations in Idaho and guide harvest season recommendations for the next 6 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Nez Perce–Clearwater National Forests Forest Plan Assessment 5.0
    Nez Perce–Clearwater National Forests Forest Plan Assessment 5.0 Threatened, Endangered, Proposed, and Candidate Species June 2014 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................ i List of Figures .......................................................................................................................... ii 5.0 Threatened, Endangered, Proposed, and Candidate Species .................................. 5-3 5.1 Wildlife.................................................................................................................... 5-3 5.1.1 Canada Lynx .................................................................................................... 5-3 5.1.2 Wolverine ....................................................................................................... 5-43 5.2 Aquatics ................................................................................................................. 5-52 5.2.1 Existing Information ...................................................................................... 5-52 5.2.2 Informing the Assessment.............................................................................. 5-52 5.2.3 Literature Cited .............................................................................................. 5-64 5.3 Rare Plants............................................................................................................. 5-67 5.3.1 Existing Information .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BOISE NATIONAL FOREST Annual Report 2011
    Boise National Forest 2011 Annual Report Boise Coalition members participate in a field trip to discuss Lower Clear Creek Watershed Project. Boise National Forest Moves Forward with Boise Coalition Recommended Project he Boise Forest Coalition, consisting of The Wildlife Conservation Strategy (WCS) priori- varied public and organizational interest tizes the types of activities that should be under- Coalition Primary representatives, met for nearly a year with taken to help maintain or restore habitat for wildlife Participants Lowman Ranger District staff to develop species in greatest need of conservation. The WCS a proposed suite of projects to remove culverts and also identifies where these actions are most needed. T Wilderness Society roads, build trails, cut timber and burn the forest un- For example, thinning smaller trees and connecting der controlled conditions within the Lowman Clear habitat areas will likely provide suitable habitat for Woody Biomass Creek watershed. woodpeckers, owls and elk. Utilization Initiative They presented their proposal to Boise National Thinning and controlled burning is proposed on Trout Unlimited Forest staff this summer having built an atmosphere about 1,000 acres for habitat restoration, another Common Ground of trust and better understanding of management 250 acres for protection of summer homes and pri- Southwest Idaho Mountain options through excellent dialogue, facilitated by vate lands, and another 700 acres to maintain forest Biking Association Common Ground. conditions. Controlled burns are also recommended, Long Creek Summer after some advance treatments, on about 700 acres. In November, the Lowman Ranger District initiated Home Owners an environmental review for the Lower Clear Creek A new 15-mile mountain bike trail along Miller Boise Cascade Watershed Project with a proposal to manage 2,650 Mountain ridge and leading into Clear Creek is also Wood Products LLC acres.
    [Show full text]
  • USDA Forest Service Youth Conservation Corps Projects 2021
    1 USDA Forest Service Youth Conservation Corps Projects 2021 Alabama Tuskegee, National Forests in Alabama, dates 6/6/2021--8/13/2021, Project Contact: Darrius Truss, [email protected] 404-550-5114 Double Springs, National Forests in Alabama, 6/6/2021--8/13/2021, Project Contact: Shane Hoskins, [email protected] 334-314- 4522 Alaska Juneau, Tongass National Forest / Admiralty Island National Monument, 6/14/2021--8/13/2021 Project Contact: Don MacDougall, [email protected] 907-789-6280 Arizona Douglas, Coronado National Forest, 6/13/2021--7/25/2021, Project Contacts: Doug Ruppel and Brian Stultz, [email protected] and [email protected] 520-388-8438 Prescott, Prescott National Forest, 6/13/2021--7/25/2021, Project Contact: Nina Hubbard, [email protected] 928- 232-0726 Phoenix, Tonto National Forest, 6/7/2021--7/25/2021, Project Contact: Brooke Wheelock, [email protected] 602-225-5257 Arkansas Glenwood, Ouachita National Forest, 6/7/2021--7/30/2021, Project Contact: Bill Jackson, [email protected] 501-701-3570 Mena, Ouachita National Forest, 6/7/2021--7/30/2021, Project Contact: Bill Jackson, [email protected] 501- 701-3570 California Mount Shasta, Shasta Trinity National Forest, 6/28/2021--8/6/2021, Project Contact: Marcus Nova, [email protected] 530-926-9606 Etna, Klamath National Forest, 6/7/2021--7/31/2021, Project Contact: Jeffrey Novak, [email protected] 530-841- 4467 USDA Forest Service Youth Conservation Corps Projects 2021 2 Colorado Grand Junction, Grand Mesa Uncomphagre and Gunnison National Forests, 6/7/2021--8/14/2021 Project Contact: Lacie Jurado, [email protected] 970-817-4053, 2 projects.
    [Show full text]
  • FY2021 Applications RV Fund
    FY2021 Applications RV Fund Applicant Agency: Project Total M% Match G% Grant Ongoing Score Idaho Panhandle National Forests Kit Price Campground Renovation $ 1,264,706.00 11 % $ 133,000.00 89 % $ 1,131,706.00 $ 1,131,706.00 70 Idaho Department of Parks & Recreation Henry Lake Old Loop Asphalt Repairs Phase 2 $ 140,000.00 20 % $ 28,000.00 80 % $ 112,000.00 $ 1,243,706.00 68.8 Owyhee County Fair Grounds RV Park $ 910,741.00 25 % $ 227,688.00 75 % $ 683,053.00 $ 1,926,759.00 68.2 Dworshak State Park - Replace Freeman Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation Creek Water Lines $ 400,000.00 20 % $ 80,000.00 80 % $ 320,000.00 $ 2,246,759.00 67.8 Three Island Electrical Upgrades at Trailside Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation Campground $ 450,000.00 20 % $ 90,000.00 80 % $ 360,000.00 $ 2,606,759.00 67.4 Priest Lake State Park - Upgrade Campground Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation Electrical & Water Valves $ 500,000.00 20 % $ 100,000.00 80 % $ 400,000.00 $ 3,006,759.00 67 Caribou-Targhee National Forest Flatrock Campground Improvements $ 31,950.00 25 % $ 7,950.00 75 % $ 24,000.00 $ 3,030,759.00 66.4 Laird Park Campground Water System Pump Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests House $ 31,800.00 10 % $ 3,300.00 90 % $ 28,500.00 $ 3,059,259.00 66.4 Thompson Flat Campground RV Minidoka Ranger District Enhancement Project $ 118,115.00 23 % $ 26,700.00 77 % $ 91,415.00 $ 3,150,674.00 66.4 Canyon County Parks, Cultural & Natural Resources Celebration Park East End RV Improvement $ 468,708.00 5 % $ 24,583.00 95 % $ 444,125.00 $ 3,594,799.00
    [Show full text]
  • Boreal Owl (Aegolius Funereus) Surveys on the Sawtooth and Boise
    BOREAL OWL (Aeqolius funereus) SURVEYS ON THE SAWTOOTH AND BOISE NATIONAL FORESTS BY Craig Groves Natural Heritage Section Nongame Wildlife and Endangered Species Program Bureau of Wildlife July 1988 Idaho Department of Fish and Game 600 S. Walnut St. Bow 25 Boise ID 83707 Jerry M. Conley, Director Cooperative Challenge Cost Share Project Sawtooth and Boise National Forests Idaho Department of Fish and Game Purchase Order Nos. 43-0261-8-663 (BNF) 40-0270-8-13 (SNP) TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................................... Introduction ...........................................................................................................................1 Methods .................................................................................................................................2 Results and Discussion ..........................................................................................................6 Management Considerations ...............................................................................................13 Acknowledgments ...............................................................................................................15 Literature Cited ...................................................................................................................16 Appendix A .........................................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • December 2010 Storm Data Publication
    DECEMBER 2010 VOLUME 52 NUMBER 12 STORM DATA AND UNUSUAL WEATHER PHENOMENA WITH LATE REPORTS AND CORRECTIONS NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION noaa NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITE, DATA AND INFORMATION SERVICE NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA CENTER, ASHEVILLE, NC Cover: This cover represents a few weather conditions such as snow, hurricanes, tornadoes, heavy rain and flooding that may occur in any given location any month of the year. (Photo courtesy of NCDC.) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Outstanding Storm of the Month…....………………..........……..…………..…….……...….............4 Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena......…….…....…………...…...........….........................6 Reference Notes.............……...........................……….........…..….….............................................234 STORM DATA (ISSN 0039-1972) National Climatic Data Center Editor: Joseph E. Kraft Assistant Editor: Rhonda Herndon STORM DATA is prepared, and distributed by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service (NESDIS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena narratives and Hurricane/Tropical Storm summaries are prepared by the National Weather Service. Monthly and annual statistics and summaries of tornado and lightning events resulting in deaths, injuries, and damage are compiled by the National Climatic Data Center and the National Weather Service’s (NWS) Storm Prediction Center. STORM DATA contains all confirmed information on storms
    [Show full text]
  • We Hope You Find This Field Guide a Useful Tool in Identifying Native Shrubs in Southwestern Oregon
    We hope you find this field guide a useful tool in identifying native shrubs in southwestern Oregon. 2 This guide was conceived by the “Shrub Club:” Jan Walker, Jack Walker, Kathie Miller, Howard Wagner and Don Billings, Josephine County Small Woodlands Association, Max Bennett, OSU Extension Service, and Brad Carlson, Middle Rogue Watershed Council. Photos: Text: Jan Walker Max Bennett Max Bennett Jan Walker Financial support for this guide was contributed by: • Josephine County Small • Silver Springs Nursery Woodlands Association • Illinois Valley Soil & Water • Middle Rogue Watershed Council Conservation District • Althouse Nursery • OSU Extension Service • Plant Oregon • Forest Farm Nursery Acknowledgements Helpful technical reviews were provided by Chris Pearce and Molly Sullivan, The Nature Conservancy; Bev Moore, Middle Rogue Watershed Council; Kristi Mergenthaler and Rachel Showalter, Bureau of Land Management. The format of the guide was inspired by the OSU Extension Service publication Trees to Know in Oregon by E.C. Jensen and C.R. Ross. Illustrations of plant parts on pages 6-7 are from Trees to Know in Oregon (used by permission). All errors and omissions are the responsibility of the authors. Book formatted & designed by: Flying Toad Graphics, Grants Pass, Oregon, 2007 3 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................ 4 Plant parts ................................................................................... 6 How to use the dichotomous keys ...........................................
    [Show full text]