GABBERT BUTTE NATURE PARK Hello,Gresham We’Re Parks Metro and Trails

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GABBERT BUTTE NATURE PARK Hello,Gresham We’Re Parks Metro and Trails GABBERT BUTTE NATURE PARK Hello,Gresham We’re parks Metro and trails The second-largest city in the Portland metropolitan area, Gresham is home to just over 108,000 residents DRAFT 10-3-2016 and diverse natural features, including wetlands, riparian areas, forested uplands and buttes. Over the last 150 years, Gresham’s landscape has changed from a quiet berry-farming community to a busy city with a wide variety of neighborhoods. Today, one of the most noticeable vestiges of the forestry and agricultural economy that remain are the upland open space buttes. Open space preservation Gresham has a long history of public support for protecting its diverse natural features. The earliest Gabbert Butte preservation and park planning dates back to the 1990 City of Gresham Open Space Bond Measure, where Gresham voters approved $10.3 million in general-obligation bonds to purchase park sites, wetlands, buttes, greenways and creek corridors for preservation. Significantly, Gresham’s was the first open-space bond measure approved by any community in the Portland metropolitan area. Restoration Throughout the city, restoration work is helping to improve water quality, minimize erosion and property loss, reduce flood damage and boost diversity of plant and animal life. Restoration projects in natural areas help return the ecosystem to a healthy, functioning condition. In the East Buttes, the city has focused restoration efforts on removing invasives and planting native plants. Restoration of City owned land near Butler Road included planting 5,000 forbs, rushes, shrubs, and trees. GABBERT BUTTE NATURE PARK Project overview Project Goals Opportunities to weigh in Protect habitat and water quality Open houses, and on-line surveys at DRAFT 10-3-2016 and provide meaningful and safe three milestones experiences of nature. 1. Summer 2017: Learn about Encourage participation in the site and the project, and planning from people from diverse cultural backgrounds, ages and share your ideas, or provide levels of ability. feedback on line Develop a plan to guide future 2. Fall 2017: Weigh in on site public access to the site that plan alternatives includes welcoming entry, 3. Winter 2017: Provide improved trails and opportunities feedback about preferred site to experience nature. plan Spring 2018: Review master plan document online Project Schedule GABBERT BUTTE NATURE PARK In the neighborhood Downtown Gresham Portland Centennial HS Adventist ES Dr Kane SE West Gresham ES E Powell Blvd Gordon W Powell Blvd Hollydale SW Eastman Pkwy East Gresham Russell School ES ES MS ek SE RobertsThom Dr Creek Springwater Trail er Cre reek Mill Johns on C SE Hogan Rd Gresham Butte SE Palmquist Rd Chastain Creek SE Orient Dr Heiney Creek Springwater Jenne Trail HS Butte Cedar Creek reek Creek Hogan Cedars SE Palmblad Rd Meadow C Brick ES eek reek adow CrSE Regner Rd ek Mt. Hood Butler Creek ork Me echacokeeHog C an Cre Christian Preschool N rk o F st e HWY 26 Bear Creek South F W Johnso SW Pleasant View Dr View Pleasant SW n Creek Gabbert Butte Butler Hogan Creek ES SW Butler Rd Ave SW Towle Butte Hogan Creek Towle Kelly Creek Pleasant Butte VICINITY INSET MAP Valley Wildside ES LEGEND West Bliss MULTNOMAH COUNTY Butte Sunshine Butte Gabbert Butte Master Plan Area Portland CLACKAMAS COUNTY Gresham city limits Fairview Drainageways Wood Village SE Foster Rd Parks and natural areas Troutdale Cemeteries Gresham Golf courses Schools (ES - Elementary School, MS - Middle School, HS - High School) East Bliss Bus stops Milwaukie Happy Valley Gabbert Butte Bus lines Butte Trails Lake Oswego Highways and arterials Gladstone West Linn SE Hogan Rd 0 0.125 Miles Oregon City NTS Sunshine Creek GABBERT BUTTE NATURE PARK The landscape today Gresham Butte Meadow Creek ddle Trail Chastain Creek Sa 1 SW Regner Rd Water Tank reek eek Heiney Creek 2 okee C w Cr Nechac Meado SW Towle Ave SW Towle 3 South Fork Fork South n Creek 4 ork Hoga Water Tower West F 5 SW 31st St 8 7 SW 33rd St 6 SW G utle abbert Fork B r C Rd h re ek Nort 11 13 10 12 Hogan 9 Butte SW 36th St SW Butler Rd SW 37th Ter LEGEND Gabbert Butte master plan area Trail Butler Creek SW Regner Rd Trailhead Drainageway Bus stop Bus line Public land Towle 0 200 Feet Butte GABBERT BUTTE NATURE PARK Visitor experience 1 2 4 3 7 5 6 8 9 10 114 12 13 GABBERT BUTTE NATURE PARK Habitat NE Burnside Rd PORTLAND GRESHAM SE Division St Willame rshed tte ate Riv Columbia River W er - Frontal hed on Creek Waters HWY 26 Johns SE Powell Blvd SE Kane Rd Kane SE SE 182nd Ave Lowe Johnson Creek r Sandy SE 122nd Ave Powell Butte Gresham SE Hogan Rd Butte R SE Orient Dr Jenne iver B Butte u W t l a e t r e SE Foster Rd C r r s e h ek ed Gabbert Butte Hogan SW Butler Rd Butte Towle HWY 26 Kelly Creek Butte MULTNOMAH COUNTY West Bliss Sunshine Butte CLACKAMAS COUNTY Butte Watershed Creek East Bliss LEGEND River Watershed Butte Johnson amas Gabbert Butte Master Plan Area er Clack Low City limits HAPPY VALLEY Scouter Highways and arterials Mountain Drainageways Parks and natural areas Watershed boundaries 0 0.25 Miles Migrating birds and resident wildlife Connecting habitats Water quality Like islands in the sea, the East Buttes are important The East Buttes natural areas help connect the watersheds of the Clackamas The East Buttes natural areas protect the for migrating birds, who need places to stop, eat and River and Johnson Creek. This is important for long-term health and diversity of headwaters of Butler, Meadow and Kelley creeks and rest along their journey. For wildlife that lives here, species facing habitat loss and climate change. many other tributaries that flow into Johnson Creek. the East Buttes provide a home, places to hunt and Upper Kelley Creek’s diversity of crustaceans, worms forage, and connections to streams, rivers and larger and aquatic insects shows the benefits of keeping habitat areas. Upland forest water cool and clean upstream. A mix of conifers and deciduous trees covers the East Buttes. Upland forests like this are common in the Pacific Northwest, but in urban areas forests have been fragmented and removed by the growth of cities. The lands protected in the East Buttes preserve core areas of upland forest within a developing area. GABBERT BUTTE NATURE PARK East Buttes wildlife Forest restoration on Metro's West Bliss Butte DRAFT 10-3-2016 This former hay field is planted This Savannah sparrow with wildflowers, native shrubs is an example of a and widely spaced trees. The migrating songbird who wildflowers and shrubs provide can take advantage food for wildlife from polinators of East Buttes habitat to deer, while the Douglas-fir trees during migration and grow with dense, broad branches nesting seasons. typical of old-growth forests. photo: Phil Nosler West Bliss Butte pollinator habitat City of Gresham restoration work in the East Buttes The city has completed numerous habitat surveys in the East Buttes and on Gabbert Butte including: upland, riparian and wetland vegetation, birds, terrestrial and aquatic amphibians, and snakes. Over the past 15 years, and with help from volunteers, the City has completed restoration of approximately 20 acres on Gabbert Butte. A nearby effort includes a large area of holly removal from a former holly farm on Gresham Butte. Ivy removal at Butler Creek Volunteer restoration event Oregon Slender Salamander Years of work by City staff has documented Oregon Slender Salamanders in the East Buttes including on Gabbert Butte. Prior to their discovery here, they had not been found west of the Cascades. The Oregon Conservation Strategy considers Oregon Slender Salamander a sensitive species. They like moist places inside large decaying logs or under slabs of bark that have fallen off of snags. Oregon Slender Salamanders are lungless and breathe through their skin! Flying Squirrels Have you seen nesting boxes on some of the trees at Gabbert Butte? The nesting boxes were installed to support northern flying squirrels. The flying squirrel doesn’t actually fly, it glides from tree to tree. These animals typically nest in large holes in trees and eat fungi and lichens, as well as seeds, nuts, insects, bird eggs and nestlings and conifer cones. Flying squirrels are seldom seen because they are nocturnal. photo: Oregon Dept. of Fish & Wildlife photo: Caters news agency GABBERT BUTTE NATURE PARK Volcanoes and floods DRAFT 10-3-2016 Lava domes Gabbert Butte is part of the Boring Volcanic Field, which contains more than 80 small volcanic vents and lava flows. These eruptions were caused by the Juan de Fuca Plate sliding under the North American Plate. Each lava dome erupted just once, and thick, slow-moving magma created buttes that we see today. The first eruptions began about 2.5 million years ago, and between 1.3 and 1 million years ago, the active field was widespread. The existing lava domes are now extinct, but some believe that the boring lava field is not. Don't worry, the likelihood of an eruption is very low! Towle Butte The youngest volcano, Floods Beacon Rock, erupted about 57,000 years ago, About 15,000 years ago, the lands surrounding the buttes and then the Missoula were flooded repeatedly, when ice dams gave way and Floods scoured away the emptied glacial Lake Missoula. The Missoula (or Bretz) cinder cone, leaving just its Floods covered the valley floor with hundreds of feet of central plug. water. Rich farmland resulted from soils washed into the valley by the floods.
Recommended publications
  • Damascus Natural Features Inventory Natural Resources Report
    DAMASCUS NATURAL FEATURES INVENTORY NATURAL RESOURCES REPORT Prepared for: CITY OF DAMASCUS 19920 SE Highway 212 Damascus, Oregon 97089 Prepared by: WINTERBROOK PLANNING 310 SW Fourth Ave., Suite 1100 Portland, Oregon 97204 July 2007 Plan Update Adopted by City Council on X, 2013 Damascus Natural Features Inventory Goal 5 Natural Resources Report July 2007 Damascus Natural Features Inventory Natural Resources Report Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Summary of Findings ................................................................................................................... 2 Wetlands ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Riparian Corridors ...................................................................................................................... 3 Wildlife Habitat .......................................................................................................................... 3 Groundwater Resources .............................................................................................................. 4 Scenic Waterways ....................................................................................................................... 4 Study Area Overview ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • East Buttes, Terraces, and Wetlands Conservation
    EAST BUTTES, TERRACES AND WETLANDS CONSERVATION PLAN INVENTORY, ANALYSIS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE PROTECTION OF EAST PORTLAND NATURAL, SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE RESOURCES Adopted by City Council May 26, 1993 Effective June 25, 1993 Ordinance No. 166572 Bureau of Planning Portland, Oregon July 1993 Portland City Council Vera Katz, Mayor Earl Blumenauer, Commissioner Charlie Hales, Commissioner Gretchen Kafoury, Commissioner Michael Lindberg, Commissioner Portland Planning Commission w. Richard Cooley, President Richard Michaelson, Vice President Joan Brown-Kline Jean DeMaster Bruce Fong Margaret Kirkpatrick Vivian Parker Paul Schubach Doug Van Dyk To help ensure equal access to information, the Portland Planning Bureau offers the following services: • Interpreter (two working days notice required); • Accessible meeting places; • Audio Loop equipped hearing rooms in City Hall and the Portland Building; and • Planning documents printed in large type sizes (two working days notice required). For more information, please call 823-7709 or 823-6868. EAST BUTTES, TERRACES AND WETLANDS CONSERVATION PLAN Adopted by City Council May 26, 1993 Effective June 25, 1993 Ordinance No. 166572 Bureau of Planning Charlie Hales, Commissioner-in-Charge Robert E. Stacey, Jr., Planning Director Robert E. Clay, Chief Planner, Long Range Planning and Urban Design Project Staff Tim Brooks, Project Manager Beth White, Planning Assistant Project Assistance Duncan Brown, Senior Planner Tom McGuire, City Planner Ralph Thomas Rogers, Urban Ecologist Geoff Sauncy, Graphic
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Areas Restoration Plan October 2010
    Natural Areas Restoration Plan October 2010 Update: March 2015 Natural Areas Restoration Plan Update March 18, 2015 Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) completed the first system wide Natural Areas Restoration Plan (plan) in October 2010. The plan was completed as a requirement for Salmon Safe certification. It established restoration goals and strategies, management priorities and implementation actions. It is currently used to set restoration priorities (staff effort and funding) for natural areas. The plan stated that there would be a review and update every 3-5 years. The 2014 update modified the functional methodology and revised the weighting to remove the emphasis on salmonids and their habitat needs. The 2014 Natural Area Management Priority Matrix changes are based on the updated natural resource function methodology and ecological health determined by the best professional judgment of the ecologist managing the site. The goals, strategies and implementation actions remain the same. This updates also includes the natural area properties purchased since 2010. Methodology Update The methodology update evaluated additional functions and created a new weighting system. The original plan weighted functions associated with salmon habitat the highest while this update does not. Some of the updated functions were assigned weighted scores on a scale of 3 (high) to 1 (low) similar to the scoring used in the 2010 plan. A natural area was also given points for Terrestrial Ecology Enhancement Strategy (TEES) special status habitats and City of Portland At-Risk Species. The functions included are: (see attached memo for details): Streams: Perennial, non-perennial and within 100 feet of the natural area.
    [Show full text]
  • MASTER PLAN Gabbert Butte Nature Park June 2019
    MASTER PLAN Gabbert Butte Nature Park June 2019 oregonmetro.gov/parks greshamoregon.gov/parks Metro Council President Hello, We’re Metro – nice to meet you. Lynn Peterson In a metropolitan area as big as Portland, we can do a lot of things better together. Join us to help Metro Councilors the region prepare for a happy, healthy future. Shirley Craddick, District 1 Christine Lewis, District 2 Stay in touch with news, stories and Craig Dirksen, District 3 things to do. Juan Carlos Gonzalez, District 4 Sam Chase, District 5 oregonmetro.gov/parksandnaturenews Bob Stacey, District 6 Auditor Brian Evans Follow oregonmetro City Council Shane Bemis, Mayor Jerry W. Hinton Eddy Morales Karylinn Echols Mario Palmero David Widmark Janine Gladfelter Follow cityofgresham Acknowledgments Stakeholder Advisory Committee Whitney Bailey (East Multnomah Soil and Water Conservation District) Regina Blake (East County Windwalkers) Jim Buck (Gresham Butte Neighborhood Association) Kat Conard (neighbor) Louise Dix (East County Windwalkers) Jason Howard (Johnson Creek Watershed Council) Isatou Jallow (Connect with Nature) Ruth Jensen (Connect with Nature) Francis Kham (Connect with Nature) Micah Meskel (Portland Audubon) Daisy Nguyen (Connect with Nature) Phil Nosler (neighbor, West Bliss Butte site steward) Brent Sullivan (Northwest Trail Alliance) Hoan Tran (Connect with Nature) Gabbert Butte Nature Park Master Plan iii Executive summary The East Buttes natural areas form large patches of upland forest from Gresham to Happy Valley. The natural areas span two counties and bridge the Johnson Creek and Clackamas River watersheds. They protect headwater streams that feed these rivers, including a significant part of Johnson Creek’s watershed. The Connect with The region’s most urban stream, Johnson Creek is a focus of salmon and lamprey recovery and the forests in the East Buttes Nature initiative led are critical to this effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Earth Hazards of The
    Chapter 10: Earth Hazards of the weather • the measure Western US of short-term conditions of the atmosphere such as temperature, wind speed, and Natural hazards are events that result from natural processes and that humidity. have signifi cant impacts on human beings. Extreme weather conditions or geologic activity can cause substantial short-term or long-term changes to our environment. These changes can infl uence crops, homes, infrastructure, and plates • large, rigid pieces of the atmosphere. The 4.6-billion-year-old Earth has experienced many of these the Earth’s crust and upper natural changes, and it has always adjusted accordingly. mantle, which move and interact with one another at their boundaries. The Western United States is located at the junction of three tectonic plates: the Pacifi c, the Juan de Fuca, and the North American. The movement of these plates, even though it occurs on the scale of millimeters per year, makes the Western US a dynamic landscape. The dramatic result is a dizzying assortment subduction • the process of natural hazards such as earthquakes, tsunamis, landslides, and volcanoes. by which one plate moves The Pacifi c plate is subducting under Alaska, creating the volcanoes of the under another, sinking into the mantle. Aleutian Islands. The Juan de Fuca plate is subducting under Washington, Oregon, and Northern California, creating the Cascade volcanoes, and the Pacifi c plate is grinding past the North American plate along the famous San Andreas Fault. At the same time, the Basin and Range province, which includes fault • a fracture in the Earth’s nearly the entire state of Nevada, is being stretched and faulted by plate crust in which the rock on one side of the fracture moves movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Portland Harbor RI/FS Final Remedial Investigation Report February 8, 2016
    Portland Harbor RI/FS Final Remedial Investigation Report February 8, 2016 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING This section describes the current and historical physical characteristics and human uses of the Portland Harbor Superfund Site (Site). Physical characteristics of the Site include meteorology, regional geology and hydrogeology, surface water hydrology, the physical system (which includes bathymetry, sediment characteristics, and hydrodynamics and sediment transport), habitat, and surface features. Human characteristics of the Site that are discussed here include historical and current land and river use, the municipal sewer system, and human access and use. In addition to providing context to the RI sampling and analysis, the factors presented in this section are considered in the refinement of the study area-wide CSM, which is presented in Section 10. Section 3.1 focuses primarily on the physical setting within the study area (RM 1.9 to 11.8). However, the physical features of the Willamette River from Willamette Falls (RM 26) to the Columbia River (RM 0), as well as the upstream portion of Multnomah Channel, are discussed as needed to place the study area’s physical characteristics into a regional context. The Willamette River basin has a drainage area of 11,500 square miles and is bordered by foothills and mountains of the Cascade and Coast ranges up to 10,000 ft high to the south, east, and west (Trimble 1963). The main channel of the Willamette forms in the southern portion of the valley near Eugene, at the convergence of the Middle and Coast forks. It flows through the broad and fertile Willamette Valley region and at Oregon City flows over the Willamette Falls and passes through Portland before joining the Columbia River (Map 3.1-1).
    [Show full text]
  • Scouters Mountain Nature Park FIELD GUIDE
    Scouters Mountain Nature Park FIELD GUIDE Fir trees sway overhead and songbirds years ago. Metro acquired this site in 2011 chirp as you travel up the narrow road to and, spent three years restoring its 100 Scouters Mountain, creating a pervasive acres of mature Douglas fir, big leaf maple feeling of deep, sheltering woods. Near the and Oregon white oak forest to make way top of the road, a plateau offers stunning for the region’s newest nature park. About views of Mt. Hood on clear days. After you half of the forest includes trees more than visit, you’ll see why thousands of Boy a century old, with some that have grown Scouts made this journey over the years to here for more than 220 years. Metro has camp and explore here; Scouters feels like removed invasive weeds from the a very special place. If you look closely at mountain’s northern slopes and planted the picnic shelter at the top of the park, some 30,000 native trees and shrubs. The you will spot salvaged beams from the forest will continue to be monitored for legendary Chief Obie Lodge — the site of years to come. many weddings, community events and summer camps before it closed in 2004. Restoration efforts have helped create an amazing new nature park to explore, as Rising more than 700 feet above the well as habitat for sensitive species such as growing communities of Happy Valley and migratory birds. Listen for their calls as Pleasant Valley, Scouters Mountain gives you hike the park’s twisting trails, taking you an opportunity to explore an extinct you past huge Douglas firs.
    [Show full text]
  • A 68-Unit Apartment Community
    A 68-Unit Apartment Community Portland, OR OFFERING MEMORANDUM EXCLUSIVELY REPRESENTED BY Jordan A. Carter Clay Newton Executive Vice President Executive Vice President Shareholder Shareholder 503.221.2280 503.721.2719 [email protected] [email protected] Tyler Linn Vice President TABLE OF 503.221.2702 [email protected] kiddermathews.com CONTENTS The information contained herein is proprietary and strictly confidential. It is intended to be reviewed only by the party receiving it from Kidder Mathews and should not be made available to any other person or entity without the written consent of Kidder Mathews. Section 1 This information has been prepared to provide summary, unverified information to prospective purchasers, and to establish only a preliminary level of interest in the subject property. The information contained herein is not a substitute for a thorough due diligence investigation. Executive Summary Kidder Mathews has not made any investigation, and makes no warranty or representation, with respect to the income or expenses for the subject property, the future projected financial performance of the property, the size and square footage of the property and improvements, the presence or absence of contaminating substances, PCB’s or asbestos, the compliance with State and Federal regulations, the physical condition of the improvements thereon, or the financial condition or business prospects of any tenant, or any tenant’s plans or intentions to continue its occupancy of the subject property. The information contained in this Marketing Brochure has Section 2 been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable; however, Kidder Mathews has not verified, and will not verify, any of the information contained herein, nor has Kidder Mathews conducted any investigation regarding these matters and makes no warranty or representation whatsoever regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geological Newsletter “News of the Geological Society of the Oregon Country”
    The Geological Newsletter “News of the Geological Society of the Oregon Country” Volume 79, Number 1 January/February 2013 The Geological Society of the Oregon Country Past Presidents: P.O. Box 907, Portland, OR 97207-0907 Rik Smoody - 360/546-2019 www.gsoc.org [email protected] 2011 - 2012 Administration: Larry Purchase – 360/254-5635 President: [email protected] Jane Walpole – 503/590-7501 Newsletter Editor and Calendar: [email protected] Carol Hasenberg – 503/522-4249 Vice-President: [email protected] John Piccininni – 503/284-9674 Website: [email protected] Janet Rasmussen − 541/753-0774 Secretary [email protected] Paul Edison-Lahm – 971/404-6064 Business Manager: [email protected] Jan Kem – 503/799-6871 Treasurer [email protected] Dawn Juliano (2 years) - 503/367-7708 Assistant Business Manager: [email protected] Anne O’Neill - 503/477-7827 Directors: [email protected] Tara Schoffstall (1 year) – 503/513-6925 Field Trip Committee Chair [email protected] Dave Olcott– 503/695-5219 Julia Lanning (2 years) – 503/201-8022 [email protected] [email protected] Janet Rasmussen (3 years) − 541/753-0774 VISITORS WELCOME AT ALL MEETINGS [email protected] CALENDAR prepared by Wang, Chris Goldfinger (OSU), and Kent Yu, (OSSPAC ). January/February Friday evening talk, February 8, 2013, at 7:30 p.m., in Activities Room S17, Cramer Hall, 1721 SW Broadway Ave. (between Montgomery and Mill Sts.), Portland State Friday evening talk, January 11, 2013, at 7:30 p.m., in University. Speaker Casie Davidson, environmental Room S17, Cramer Hall, 1721 SW Broadway Ave. researcher at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (between Montgomery and Mill Sts.), Portland State (PNNL), will present “Wind Energy Meets PNW University.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Work Plan
    Beneficial Ground Water Use Determination Former Troh Landfill Property 10010 SE Vradenburg Road Happy Valley, Oregon August 16, 2014 Prepared for: The Holt Group / Holt Homes 2601 NE 163rd Court Vancouver, Washington 98684 Prepared by: Creekside Environmental Consulting, LLC 21790 Southwest Chehalis Court Tualatin, Oregon 97062 T. (503) 692-8118 and P.O. Box 14488 Portland, Oregon 97293 T. 503-452-5561 E. [email protected] LYNN D GREEN Exp. 1/31/2016 Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Background ................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Purpose .......................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Scope .............................................................................................................. 5 2.0 SITE SETTING ............................................................................................................ 6 2.1 Description and Location ............................................................................. 6 2.2 Climate ........................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Topography .................................................................................................... 9 2.4 Cultural Setting .............................................................................................. 9 2.5 Regional Geologic
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Geology, December 1999
    WASHINGTON VOL. 27, NO. 2/3/4 DECEMBER 1999 RESOURCES GEOLOGY NATURAL IN THIS ISSUE z Geology of Steamboat Rock, Grand Coulee, Washington, p. 3 z Observations of glacial, geomorphic, biologic, and mineralogic developments in the crater of Mount St. Helens, Washington, p. 9 z Augite crystals from Doty Hills, Lewis County, Washington, p. 20 z Some notable finds of Columbian Mammoths from Washington State, p. 23 z July 2, 1999, Satsop earthquake, p. 28 z Do we really need another wake-up call?, p. 29 z Earth Connections, p. 30 The Future of Washington Geology WASHINGTON We apologize for our sporadic publication schedule over the GEOLOGY last two years. Budget cuts and understaffing have taken their Vol. 27, No. 2/3/4 toll. Starting with the year 2000, we plan to issue Washington December 1999 Geology three times a year—in March, July, and November. Is- sues will be smaller, but we plan to keep the same high stan- dards. We will still be looking for articles on various facets of Washington Geology (ISSN 1058-2134) is published four times each year by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, the geology of Washington that appeal to both the professional Division of Geology and Earth Resources. This publication is free upon geologist and the interested amateur. We do not charge for pub- request. The Division also publishes bulletins, information circulars, lication, but neither do we pay the author. Instead, authors re- reports of investigations, geologic maps, and open-file reports. A list of ceive 20 complimentary copies of the issue containing their these publications will be sent upon request.
    [Show full text]
  • CLACKAMAS COUNTY, OREGON and INCORPORATED AREAS Volume 1 of 3
    CLACKAMAS COUNTY, OREGON AND INCORPORATED AREAS Volume 1 of 3 Community Community Name Number BARLOW, CITY OF 410013 CANBY, CITY OF 410014 DAMASCUS, CITY OF 410006 *ESTACADA, CITY OF 410016 GLADSTONE, CITY OF 410017 HAPPY VALLEY, CITY OF 410026 *JOHNSON CITY, CITY OF 410267 LAKE OSWEGO, CITY OF 410018 MILWAUKIE, CITY OF 410019 *MOLALLA, CITY OF 410020 OREGON CITY, CITY OF 410021 RIVERGROVE, CITY OF 410022 SANDY, CITY OF 410023 WEST LINN, CITY OF 410024 WILSONVILLE, CITY OF 410025 CLACKAMAS COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 415588 *Non-floodprone EFFECTIVE: JUNE 17, 2008 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 41005CV001A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Old Zone New Zone A1 through A30 AE V1 through V30 VE B X C X Part or all of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the Flood Insurance Study. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current Flood Insurance Study components. TABLE OF CONTENTS – Volume 1 Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of Study................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]