DOCSLIB.ORG

Damascus Natural Features Inventory Natural Resources Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Damascus Natural Features Inventory Natural Resources Report DAMASCUS NATURAL FEATURES INVENTORY NATURAL RESOURCES REPORT Prepared for: CITY OF DAMASCUS 19920 SE Highway 212 Damascus, Oregon 97089 Prepared by: WINTERBROOK PLANNING 310 SW Fourth Ave., Suite 1100 Portland, Oregon 97204 July 2007 Plan Update Adopted by City Council on X, 2013 Damascus Natural Features Inventory Goal 5 Natural Resources Report July 2007 Damascus Natural Features Inventory Natural Resources Report Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Summary of Findings ................................................................................................................... 2 Wetlands ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Riparian Corridors ...................................................................................................................... 3 Wildlife Habitat .......................................................................................................................... 3 Groundwater Resources .............................................................................................................. 4 Scenic Waterways ....................................................................................................................... 4 Study Area Overview .................................................................................................................... 4 Climate ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Topography ................................................................................................................................. 6 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................... 6 Geology ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Soils............................................................................................................................................. 8 Public Involvement and Agency Coordination .......................................................................... 9 Public Involvement ..................................................................................................................... 9 Agency Coordination ................................................................................................................ 11 Wetlands ...................................................................................................................................... 12 Inventory Methods .................................................................................................................... 12 Review of Existing Information .......................................................................................................... 13 Field Inventory ................................................................................................................................... 13 Wetland Function and Condition Assessment .................................................................................... 14 Mapping Procedures .......................................................................................................................... 16 Inventory Results ...................................................................................................................... 17 Wetland Classes ................................................................................................................................. 17 Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 20 Wetland Assessment Results .................................................................................................... 21 Significant Wetlands Determination ......................................................................................... 25 Riparian Corridors ..................................................................................................................... 26 Inventory Methods .................................................................................................................... 26 Review of Existing Information .......................................................................................................... 27 Field Inventory ................................................................................................................................... 29 Functional Assessment and Significance Determination ................................................................... 29 Inventory Results ...................................................................................................................... 31 Riparian Corridor Assessment Results ..................................................................................... 34 Damascus Natural Features Inventory Goal 5 Natural Resources Report July 2007 Significant Riparian Corridor Determination ........................................................................... 36 Wildlife Habitat ........................................................................................................................... 37 Inventory Methods .................................................................................................................... 37 Review of Existing Information .......................................................................................................... 37 Field Inventory ................................................................................................................................... 38 Inventory Results ...................................................................................................................... 40 Assessment Summary.......................................................................................................................... 43 Significant Habitat Determination ............................................................................................ 45 Groundwater Resources ............................................................................................................. 47 Inventory Methods .................................................................................................................... 47 Inventory Results ...................................................................................................................... 48 Significant Groundwater Resource Determination ................................................................... 49 Oregon Scenic Waterways ......................................................................................................... 50 Overview ................................................................................................................................... 50 Significant Oregon Scenic Waterway Determination ............................................................... 50 Implementation Options............................................................................................................ 50 Appendices Appendix A. Definitions Appendix B. References Appendix C: Wetland Characterization Sheets Appendix D: Wetland Assessment Summary Sheets Appendix E: OFWAM Summary Sheets Appendix F: Wetland Data Sheets Appendix G: Riparian Corridor Summary Sheets Appendix H: Wildlife Habitat Assessment Summaries Appendix I: Clackamas River Scenic Waterway Management Program and Background Report Appendix J: Wetland Staff Qualifications Tables Table 1. Rainfall averages and actual levels for the 2006-2007 Water Year. Table 2. Daily Rainfall, February through April, 2007. Damascus Natural Features Inventory Goal 5 Natural Resources Report July 2007 Table 3. Damascus Sub-basins and Acreages Table 4. Damascus Soil Characteristics Table 5. Wetland Size by Subwatershed Table 6. Wetland Cowardin Classifications Table 7. Wetland Hydrogeomorphic Classifications Table 8. Wetlands by Subwatershed Table 9. OFWAM Wetland Assessment and LSW Results Table 10. Wetland Assessment Results for Key Wetland Functions Table 11. Watersheds, Subwatersheds, and Acres within Damascus Table 12. Riparian Site Characteristics, Length and Area Table 13. Riparian Functional Assessment Summary Table 14. Riparian Functional Assessment Results Table 15. Summary of Habitat Site Characteristics Table 16. Habitat Assessment Summary Figures Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. Soil Types within Damascus Figure 3. Wetland and Water Resource Inventory Figure 4. Wildlife Habitat and Riparian Corridors Figure 5. Groundwater Inventory Figure 6. Oregon Scenic Waterway Damascus Natural Features Inventory Goal 5 Natural Resources Report July 2007 Damascus Natural Features Inventory Goal 5 Natural Resources Report July 2007 Introduction In 2006, The City of Damascus, through a Goal 5 Planning grant from the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development, retained a consultant team led by Winterbrook Planning to conduct an inventory of natural resources within the city limits In 2012 the City Council funded an update the Natural Resources Inventory in response to concerns of accuracy of the original. In 2012 the City asked each property owner with a mapped natural
Load more

Recommended publications
  • East Buttes, Terraces, and Wetlands Conservation
    EAST BUTTES, TERRACES AND WETLANDS CONSERVATION PLAN INVENTORY, ANALYSIS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE PROTECTION OF EAST PORTLAND NATURAL, SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE RESOURCES Adopted by City Council May 26, 1993 Effective June 25, 1993 Ordinance No. 166572 Bureau of Planning Portland, Oregon July 1993 Portland City Council Vera Katz, Mayor Earl Blumenauer, Commissioner Charlie Hales, Commissioner Gretchen Kafoury, Commissioner Michael Lindberg, Commissioner Portland Planning Commission w. Richard Cooley, President Richard Michaelson, Vice President Joan Brown-Kline Jean DeMaster Bruce Fong Margaret Kirkpatrick Vivian Parker Paul Schubach Doug Van Dyk To help ensure equal access to information, the Portland Planning Bureau offers the following services: • Interpreter (two working days notice required); • Accessible meeting places; • Audio Loop equipped hearing rooms in City Hall and the Portland Building; and • Planning documents printed in large type sizes (two working days notice required). For more information, please call 823-7709 or 823-6868. EAST BUTTES, TERRACES AND WETLANDS CONSERVATION PLAN Adopted by City Council May 26, 1993 Effective June 25, 1993 Ordinance No. 166572 Bureau of Planning Charlie Hales, Commissioner-in-Charge Robert E. Stacey, Jr., Planning Director Robert E. Clay, Chief Planner, Long Range Planning and Urban Design Project Staff Tim Brooks, Project Manager Beth White, Planning Assistant Project Assistance Duncan Brown, Senior Planner Tom McGuire, City Planner Ralph Thomas Rogers, Urban Ecologist Geoff Sauncy, Graphic
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Areas Restoration Plan October 2010
    Natural Areas Restoration Plan October 2010 Update: March 2015 Natural Areas Restoration Plan Update March 18, 2015 Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) completed the first system wide Natural Areas Restoration Plan (plan) in October 2010. The plan was completed as a requirement for Salmon Safe certification. It established restoration goals and strategies, management priorities and implementation actions. It is currently used to set restoration priorities (staff effort and funding) for natural areas. The plan stated that there would be a review and update every 3-5 years. The 2014 update modified the functional methodology and revised the weighting to remove the emphasis on salmonids and their habitat needs. The 2014 Natural Area Management Priority Matrix changes are based on the updated natural resource function methodology and ecological health determined by the best professional judgment of the ecologist managing the site. The goals, strategies and implementation actions remain the same. This updates also includes the natural area properties purchased since 2010. Methodology Update The methodology update evaluated additional functions and created a new weighting system. The original plan weighted functions associated with salmon habitat the highest while this update does not. Some of the updated functions were assigned weighted scores on a scale of 3 (high) to 1 (low) similar to the scoring used in the 2010 plan. A natural area was also given points for Terrestrial Ecology Enhancement Strategy (TEES) special status habitats and City of Portland At-Risk Species. The functions included are: (see attached memo for details): Streams: Perennial, non-perennial and within 100 feet of the natural area.
    [Show full text]
  • MASTER PLAN Gabbert Butte Nature Park June 2019
    MASTER PLAN Gabbert Butte Nature Park June 2019 oregonmetro.gov/parks greshamoregon.gov/parks Metro Council President Hello, We’re Metro – nice to meet you. Lynn Peterson In a metropolitan area as big as Portland, we can do a lot of things better together. Join us to help Metro Councilors the region prepare for a happy, healthy future. Shirley Craddick, District 1 Christine Lewis, District 2 Stay in touch with news, stories and Craig Dirksen, District 3 things to do. Juan Carlos Gonzalez, District 4 Sam Chase, District 5 oregonmetro.gov/parksandnaturenews Bob Stacey, District 6 Auditor Brian Evans Follow oregonmetro City Council Shane Bemis, Mayor Jerry W. Hinton Eddy Morales Karylinn Echols Mario Palmero David Widmark Janine Gladfelter Follow cityofgresham Acknowledgments Stakeholder Advisory Committee Whitney Bailey (East Multnomah Soil and Water Conservation District) Regina Blake (East County Windwalkers) Jim Buck (Gresham Butte Neighborhood Association) Kat Conard (neighbor) Louise Dix (East County Windwalkers) Jason Howard (Johnson Creek Watershed Council) Isatou Jallow (Connect with Nature) Ruth Jensen (Connect with Nature) Francis Kham (Connect with Nature) Micah Meskel (Portland Audubon) Daisy Nguyen (Connect with Nature) Phil Nosler (neighbor, West Bliss Butte site steward) Brent Sullivan (Northwest Trail Alliance) Hoan Tran (Connect with Nature) Gabbert Butte Nature Park Master Plan iii Executive summary The East Buttes natural areas form large patches of upland forest from Gresham to Happy Valley. The natural areas span two counties and bridge the Johnson Creek and Clackamas River watersheds. They protect headwater streams that feed these rivers, including a significant part of Johnson Creek’s watershed. The Connect with The region’s most urban stream, Johnson Creek is a focus of salmon and lamprey recovery and the forests in the East Buttes Nature initiative led are critical to this effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Clatsop Butte Park Master Plan
    Clatsop Butte Park Master Plan March 2009 Clatsop Butte Park Master Plan December 2008 Acknowledgments Project Advisory Committee (PAC) Consultant Team Mark Brown, Hawthorne Ridge Homeowners’ Association Walker Macy Landscape Architects and Planners Lorraine Gonzales, MacGregor Heights Homeowners’ Association Mauricio Villarreal, Principal-in-charge Paul Grosjean, Vice Chair, Pleasant Valley Neighborhood Association Eric Bode, Managing Principal Chad Sorenson, Neighbor Colleen Wolfe, Project Manager Jon Simonson, Neighbor Gary Datka, Project Designer Vainu Rao, Neighbor Ken Pirie, Planner Bob Sallinger, Portland Audubon Society Monica Klau, Report Designer Matt Clark, Greg Ciannella, Johnson Creek Watershed Council Jeanne Lawson Associates, Public Involvement Specialists Bill Hawkins, Portland Parks Board Christine Egan, Project Manager Stacy Fleck, Teacher, Centennial High School Shareen Rawlings, Project Coordinator Pacific Habitat Services, Wetland and Habitat Analysis Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) John van Staveren, Principal Andre Ashley, Sports Supervisor; Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) Grummel Engineering, Civil Engineering Louie Guerrero, Operations Manager; PP&R Bob Grummel, Principal Kathleen Murrin, Zone Manager; PP&R Emily Roth, Natural Resources Planner; PP&R Brett Horner, Strategic Projects Manager; PP&R Doug Brenner, East Portland Services Manager; PP&R Portland Parks & Recreation Jennifer Antak, JC Team; Bureau of Environmental Services (BES) 1120 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 1302 Lydia Neill, Construction Supervisor;
    [Show full text]
  • GABBERT BUTTE NATURE PARK Hello,Gresham We’Re Parks Metro and Trails
    GABBERT BUTTE NATURE PARK Hello,Gresham We’re parks Metro and trails The second-largest city in the Portland metropolitan area, Gresham is home to just over 108,000 residents DRAFT 10-3-2016 and diverse natural features, including wetlands, riparian areas, forested uplands and buttes. Over the last 150 years, Gresham’s landscape has changed from a quiet berry-farming community to a busy city with a wide variety of neighborhoods. Today, one of the most noticeable vestiges of the forestry and agricultural economy that remain are the upland open space buttes. Open space preservation Gresham has a long history of public support for protecting its diverse natural features. The earliest Gabbert Butte preservation and park planning dates back to the 1990 City of Gresham Open Space Bond Measure, where Gresham voters approved $10.3 million in general-obligation bonds to purchase park sites, wetlands, buttes, greenways and creek corridors for preservation. Significantly, Gresham’s was the first open-space bond measure approved by any community in the Portland metropolitan area. Restoration Throughout the city, restoration work is helping to improve water quality, minimize erosion and property loss, reduce flood damage and boost diversity of plant and animal life. Restoration projects in natural areas help return the ecosystem to a healthy, functioning condition. In the East Buttes, the city has focused restoration efforts on removing invasives and planting native plants. Restoration of City owned land near Butler Road included planting 5,000 forbs, rushes, shrubs, and trees. GABBERT BUTTE NATURE PARK Project overview Project Goals Opportunities to weigh in Protect habitat and water quality Open houses, and on-line surveys at DRAFT 10-3-2016 and provide meaningful and safe three milestones experiences of nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Scott / Scouters Mountain Trail Loop Master Plan
    Mount Scott / Scouters Mountain Trail Loop Master Plan February 2014 North Clackamas Parks and Recreation District | Portland Parks & Recreation | City of Happy Valley | Clackamas County Prepared for: Metro Sustainability Center North Clackamas Parks and Recreation District City of Happy Valley Portland Parks & Recreation Clackamas County Prepared by: Otak, Inc. Alta Planning+Design 808 SW Third Avenue, Suite 300 711 SE Grand Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204 Portland, Oregon 97214 503.287.6825 503.230.9862 www.otak.com www.altaplanning.com David Haynes George Hudson Mandy Flett Karen Vitkay Brad Swearingen Plans and Appendices will be available online at Metro and partner websites. CDs of plans are available at cost from Metro. A printed version will be placed in local libraries. Mount Scott / Scouters Mountain Trail Loop Master Plan February 2014 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland, Oregon 97232 Mel Huie, Project Manager 503.797.1731 [email protected] Portland Parks & Recreation North Clackamas Parks and Recreation District 1120 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 1302 150 Beavercreek Road Portland, Oregon 97204 Oregon City, Oregon 97045 503.823.6007 503.742.4348 www.portlandoregon.gov/parks www.ncprd.com Clackamas County City of Happy Valley 150 Beavercreek Road 16000 SE Misty Drive Oregon City, Oregon 97045 Happy Valley, Oregon 97086 503.742.4500 503.783.3800 www.clackamas.us www.ci.happy-valley.or.us Printed on Recycled Paper A CKNOWLEDGEMENTS Metro Mel Huie, Regional Trails Coordinator and Project Manager Heather Coston Kate Holleran Leslie Knight
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Arguments for Protecting the Natural Resources of the East Buttes Area in Southeast Portland
    Economic Arguments for Protecting the Natural Resources of the East Buttes Area in Southeast Portland FINAL REPORT May 2009 99 W. 10th Avenue, Suite 400 Eugene, OR 97401 Phone: 541-687-0051 www.econw.com © ECONorthwest 2009 CONTACT INFORMATION This report was prepared by Ed MacMullan and Sarah Reich of ECONorthwest (ECO), with assistance from Julie Wilson and Libby Smith of EnviroIssues, for the City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services (BES). We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of the many individuals who provided us with information and insight, including: Ry Thompson – BES Columbia Slough Watershed Group Deborah Lev – Portland Parks & Recreation Roberta Jortner – Bureau of Planning & Sustainability Kevin Martin – Bureau of Planning & Sustainability Maggie Skendarian - BES Johnson Creek Watershed Group Frank Wildensee - BES Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Group Dawn Uchiyama - BES Stormwater Group Sean Bistoff - BES Johnson Creek Watershed Group Emily Hauth - Sustainable Stormwater Management Program Jennifer Antak - BES Johnson Creek Watershed Group Ali Young - BES Johnson Creek Watershed Group Marie Johnson - BES Johnson Creek Watershed Group Mike Rosen - BES Watershed Division ECO specializes in the economic and financial analysis of public policy. ECO has analyzed the economics of resource-management, land-use development, and growth-management issues for municipalities, state and federal agencies, and private clients for more than 30 years. For more information, please contact: Ed MacMullan Sarah Reich [email protected] [email protected] ECONorthwest 99 W. 10th Ave., Suite 400 Eugene, Oregon 97401 541-687-0051 ECONorthwest East Buttes Economic Analysis i TABLE OF CONTENTS Contact Information i Table of Contents ii Executive Summary iv I.
    [Show full text]
  • Portland Plant List
    PORTLAND PLANT LIST June 2016 Portland City Council Bureau of Planning and Sustainability Charlie Hales, Mayor Susan Anderson, Planning and Sustainability Director Nick Fish, Commissioner Joseph Zehnder, Chief Planner Amanda Fritz, Commissioner Steve Novick, Commissioner Dan Saltzman, Commissioner Adopted by Portland City Council Administrative rule update, Bureau of November, 13, 1991 Planning and Sustainability April 13, 2011 Effective December 13, 1991 Effective May 13, 2011 Ordinance No. 164838 Ordinance No. 184521 Amended May 26, 1993 Effective July 1, 2011 Ordinance No. 166572; September 21, 1994 Ordinance No. 184524 Ordinance No. 168154; March 19, 1997 Administrative rule update, Bureau of Ordinance No. 171000; June 24, 1998; Planning and Sustainability March 23, 2004; June 2009 Effective June 27, 2016 Re-established as administrative rule by The Portland native plants policy was selected as a City Council February 10, 2010 semifinalist for the 1993 Innovations in State Effective July 1, 2010 and Local Government Awards sponsored by the Ford Foundation and The JFK School of Ordinance No. 183534 Government at Harvard University. The Bureau of Planning and Sustainability is committed to providing meaningful access. For accommodations, modifications, translation, interpretation or other services, please contact at 503-823-7700 or use City TTY 503-823-6868, or Oregon Relay Service: 711. Traducción o | ترجمة تحريرية أو شفهية | interpretación | Chuyển Ngữ hoặc Phiên Dịch | 翻译或传译 | Письменный или устный перевод | Traducere sau Interpretare 翻訳または通訳 ii Письмовий або усний переклад | | Turjumida ama Fasiraadda | ການແປພາສາ 꺼ື ການອະທິບາຍ — 503-823-7700. Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1 – 1 Modification of the Portland Plant List ............................. 1 – 3 How to Use the Lists ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Condition and Capacity
    Infrastructure Condition and Capacity PORTLAND PLAN BACKGROUND REPORT FALL 2009 Infrastructure Acknowledgments Condition and Capacity Bureau of Planning and Sustainability (BPS) PROSPERITY AND BUSINESS SUCCESS Mayor Sam Adams, Commissioner-in-charge Susan Anderson, Director SUSTAINABILITY AND THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Joe Zehnder, Chief Planner Steve Dotterrer, Principal Planner Eric Engstrom, Principal Planner DESIGN, PLANNING AND PUBLIC SPACES Gil Kelley, Former Director, Bureau of Planning Primary Authors NEIGHBORHOODS & HOUSING Bob Glascock, Senior Planner, BPS Michelle Kunec, Management Analyst, BPS TRANSPORTATION, TECHNOLOGY AND ACCESS Contributors Gary Odenthal, Technical Services Manager, BPS Carmen Piekarski, GIS Analyst, BPS EDUCATION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT Technical Advisors Members of the Citywide Systems Team and the HUMAN HEALTH, FOOD AND PUBLIC SAFETY City Asset Managers Group played key roles in the development of this report, including: Bureau of Environmental Services QUALITY OF LIFE, CIVIC ENGAGEMENT AND EQUITY Virgil Adderley, Principal Engineer Susan Aldrich, Capital Improvement Program Manager ARTS, CULTURE AND INNOVATION Lester Lee, System Planning Manager Ning Mao, Supervising Engineer, Asset Systems Management Bureau of Transportation Courtney Duke, Senior Transportation Planner John Gillam, Supervising Planner Jamie Waltz, Transportation Asset Manager Portland Parks & Recreation Sue Donaldson, Planner, (formerly) Nancy Gronowski, Senior Planner Portland Water Bureau Additional Technical Advisors Greg Drechsler,
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Hills Protection Plan
    NORTHWEST HILLS NATURAL AREAS PROTECTION PLAN INVENTORY, ANALYSIS AND REGULATIONS for the PROTECTION OF WETLANDS, WATER BODIES, FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITATS, OPEN SPACE AND NATURAL AREAS Adopted by City Council July 31, 1991 Effective July 31, 1991 Ordinance No. 164517 Bureau of Planning Portland, Oregon March, 1992 Portland City Council J. E. Bud Clark, Mayor Earl Blumenauer, Commissioner Dick Bogle, Commissioner Gretchen Kafoury, Commissioner Michael Lindberg, Commissioner Portland Planning Commission Martha Peck Andrews, President Richard Cooley, Vice President Stan Amy Estill Deitz Margaret Kirkpatrick Richard Michaelson Chet Orloff Vivian Parker To obtain large-print version of this document, please call 796-7709 Printed on recycled paper NORTHWEST HILLS NATURAL AREAS PROTECTION PLAN Adopted by City Council July 31, 1991 Effective July 31, 1991 Ordinance No. 164517 Bureau of Planning Gretchen Kafoury, Commissioner-In-Charge Robert E. Stacey, Jr., Planning Director Robert E. Clay, Chief Planner, Long Range Planning and Urban Design Project Staff Tim Brooks, Project Manager Damian Syrnyk, City Planner Geoff Sauncy, Graphic Illustrator Jeff Mihelich, Planning Intern Project Assistance Duncan Brown, Senior Planner Al Burns, City Planner Gail Curtis, City Planner Bob Glascock, City Planner Marge Hamlin, Word Processing Operator Esther Lev, Consulting Biologist Cary Pinard, Senior Planner CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE • RELATION TO OTHER NATURAL AREA PROJECTS • ORGANIZATION OF THE PLAN • 2 Purpose The Northwest Hills Natural Areas Protection Plan provides the inventory, analysis, and recommendations for protection of significant natural resources located on the eastern slope of Portland’s Northwest Hills. The project study area covers 6,000 acres stretching west from N.W. St. Helens Road and the Willamette Greenway up to N.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Johnson Creek Volunteer Parks Naturalist Handbook 2018
    Johnson Creek Volunteer Parks Naturalist Handbook 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS About JCWC and PP&R • Contact information • Who We Are o Johnson Creek Watershed Council o Portland Parks & Recreation Volunteer Parks Naturalist Program Information • Overview and Expectations of Volunteer Parks Naturalist Program • Volunteer Park Steward Program Team Members About the Natural Areas • Johnson Creek Watershed Overview • Locator Maps • Natural Area information: o Beggar’s-tick Wildlife Refuge o Brannen Property o (The) Buttes Natural Area o Clatsop Butte Nature Park o Cottonwood Creek Natural Area o Deardorff Creek Natural Area o Errol Heights Natural Area o Foster Floodplain and adjacent Springwater Corridor trail o Indian Creek Natural Area o Johnson Creek Park o Kingsley D. Bundy Park o Mitchell Creek Natural Area o Powell Butte Nature Park o Tideman Johnson Park o Veteran’s Creek Natural Area o Wahoo Natural Area Volunteer Park Naturalist Documentation • Report Form link: to be provided during training • iNaturalist Project link: to be provided during training • PP&R Volunteer Application, PP&R Criminal Background Check, PP&R Code of Conduct and the Media Policy will be completed during the Volunteer Park Naturalist training. Additional Resources • Regional Guides (books & websites) • Winter twig identification • Invasive species information CONTACT INFORMATION Courtney Beckel Johnson Creek Watershed Council Volunteer & Outreach Coordinator [email protected] office: 503.652.7477 Contact regarding: JCWC website; training or summer potluck; sharing
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Connectivity Modeling for the Northern Red-Legged Frog in the Portland Metropolitan Area, Oregon" (2020)
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 5-22-2020 Wildlife Connectivity Modeling for the Northern Red- legged Frog in the Portland Metropolitan Area, Oregon Amanda Hilary Temple Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Geography Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Temple, Amanda Hilary, "Wildlife Connectivity Modeling for the Northern Red-legged Frog in the Portland Metropolitan Area, Oregon" (2020). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 5432. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.7305 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Wildlife Connectivity Modeling for the Northern Red-legged Frog in the Portland Metropolitan Area, Oregon by Amanda Hilary Temple A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geography Thesis Committee: Martin Lafrenz, Chair Catherine de Rivera Geoffrey Duh Portland State University 2020 © 2020 Amanda Hilary Temple i Abstract Effective habitat connectivity tools that use GIS data perform well in remote areas but may not be as dependable in urban environments. My goal was to study uses and limitations of a conservation management tool in development, the Metro Regional Habitat Connectivity Toolkit, which evaluates connectivity for and permeability of wildlife movement. Habitat quality scores are generated from GIS-derived and field collected data such as connectivity patch/matrix characteristics, water source, vegetation, other structural components, wildlife observations, and human disturbance at survey sites.
    [Show full text]