DOCSLIB.ORG

Cyclical Visits to Mars Via Astronaut Hotels

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cyclical Visits to Mars Via Astronaut Hotels Cyclical Visits to Mars via Astronaut Hotels Phase I Final Report Global Aerospace Corporation 30 November 2000 Universities Space Research Association Research Grant No.: 07600-049 GAC Report 510-04911-007 Global Aerospace Corporation 711 W. Woodbury Road, Suite H Altadena, CA 91001-5327 USA Telephones: +1 (626) 345-1200 (626) 303-9500, Fax (626) 296-0929 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.gaerospace.com Abstract Global Aerospace Corporation is developing a revolutionary concept for an overall interplanetary rapid transit system architecture for human transportation between Earth and Mars which supports a sustained Mars base of 20 people circa 2035. This innovative design architecture relies upon the use of small, highly autonomous, solar-electric-propelled space ships, we dub Astrotels for astronaut hotels and hyperbolic rendezvous between them and the planetary transport hubs using even smaller, fast-transfer, aeroassist vehicles we shall call Taxis. Astrotels operating in cyclic orbits between Earth, Mars and the Moon and Taxis operating on rendezvous trajectories between Astrotels and transport hubs or Spaceports will enable low-cost, low-energy, frequent and short duration trips between these bodies. This proposed effort provides a vision of a far off future which establishes a context for near-term technology advance, systems studies, robotic Mars missions and human spaceflight. In this fashion Global Aerospace Corporation assists the NASA Enterprise for Human Exploration and Development of Space (HEDS) in all four of its goals, namely (1) preparing to conduct human missions of exploration to planetary and other bodies in the solar system, (2) expanding scientific knowledge (3) providing safe and affordable access to space, and (4) establishing a human presence in space. Key elements of this innovative, new concept are the use of: − Five month human flights between Earth and Mars on cyclic orbits, − Small, highly autonomous human transport vehicles or Astrotels, − In cyclic orbits between Earth and Mars − Solar Electric Propulsion for orbit corrections − Untended for more than 20 out of 26 months − No artificial gravity − Fast-transfer, aeroassist vehicles, or Taxis, between Spaceports and the cycling Astrotels, − Low energy, long flight-time orbits and unmanned vehicles for the transport of cargo, − in situ resources for propulsion and life support − Environmentally safe, propulsion/power technology Study Participants Global Aerospace Corporation (GAC) Dr. Kim M. Aaron Dale R. Burger Dr. Angus D. McRonald Kerry T. Nock, Principal Investigator and NIAC Fellow Susan L. Nock Brenda Wistor-Linfield Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) Alan L. Friedlander Mark K. Jacobs Jerry A. Rauwolf Planetary Resource Utilization Consultant Dr. Michael B. Duke Solar Electric Propulsion Technical Advisor Dr. John R. Brophy, Jet Propulsion Laboratory ii Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 CYCLICAL VISITS TO MARS VIA ASTRONAUT HOTELS..................................................................................... 9 1.2 WHAT MAKES THIS CONCEPT REVOLUTIONARY?.......................................................................................... 10 1.3 CONCEPT OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................................................... 12 1.4 POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANCE TO NASA.............................................................................................................. 13 1.5 PAST MARS STUDIES AND CURRENT RELEVANT TECHNOLOGY AND ACTIVITIES......................................... 14 1.6 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................................... 15 2CONCEPT ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY..................................................................... 17 2.1 SUMMARY OF PHASE I TASKS ......................................................................................................................... 17 2.1.1 Task 1 Conceptual Design Requirements and Assumptions............................................................... 17 2.1.2 Task 2 Celestial Mechanics ................................................................................................................. 17 2.1.3Task 3 Conceptual Transportation System Architecture Design....................................................... 17 2.1.4 Task 4 Transportation System Costs ................................................................................................... 17 2.1.5 Task 5 Planning and Reporting........................................................................................................... 17 2.2 SUMMARY OF WORK ACCOMPLISHED ............................................................................................................ 17 2.2.1 Task 1 Conceptual Design Requirements and Assumptions............................................................... 18 2.2.2 Task 2 Celestial Mechanics ................................................................................................................. 18 2.2.3Task 3 Conceptual Transportation System Architecture Design....................................................... 18 2.2.4 Task 4 Transportation System Costs ................................................................................................... 18 2.2.5 Task 5 Planning and Reporting........................................................................................................... 18 3 KEY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................................... 19 3.1 DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................................................... 19 3.1.1 Mars Base.............................................................................................................................................. 19 3.1.2 Astrotels................................................................................................................................................. 19 3.1.3 Spaceport............................................................................................................................................... 19 3.1.4 Taxi ........................................................................................................................................................ 19 3.1.5 Shuttle .................................................................................................................................................... 19 3.1.6 Lunar and Phobos Propellant Tankers ................................................................................................ 20 3.1.7 Freighter................................................................................................................................................ 20 3.1.8 Propellant Augmentation Tanks (PATs)............................................................................................... 20 3.1.9 In situ Resource Production Plants...................................................................................................... 20 3.2 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ASSUMPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS .................................................................. 20 3.2.1 Assumptions........................................................................................................................................... 20 3.2.1.1 Timeframe of Mars Base ................................................................................................................................... 20 3.2.1.2 Mars Base........................................................................................................................................................... 20 3.2.1.3 Mars Base Contingent........................................................................................................................................ 21 3.2.1.4 Lunar Base ......................................................................................................................................................... 21 3.2.1.5 Technology Horizon .......................................................................................................................................... 21 3.2.1.6 State of Scientific Knowledge........................................................................................................................... 21 3.2.1.7 Space Station...................................................................................................................................................... 21 3.2.1.8 Robotics and Automation .................................................................................................................................. 21 3.2.1.9 Cargo Transport ................................................................................................................................................. 22 3.2.1.10 Spaceports.......................................................................................................................................................... 22 3.2.1.11 Astrotel .............................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rocket Propulsion Fundamentals 2
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140002716 2019-08-29T14:36:45+00:00Z Liquid Propulsion Systems – Evolution & Advancements Launch Vehicle Propulsion & Systems LPTC Liquid Propulsion Technical Committee Rick Ballard Liquid Engine Systems Lead SLS Liquid Engines Office NASA / MSFC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted, unless for course participation and to a paid course student, in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of AIAA and/or course instructor. Contact the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Professional Development Program, Suite 500, 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, VA 20191-4344 Modules 1. Rocket Propulsion Fundamentals 2. LRE Applications 3. Liquid Propellants 4. Engine Power Cycles 5. Engine Components Module 1: Rocket Propulsion TOPICS Fundamentals • Thrust • Specific Impulse • Mixture Ratio • Isp vs. MR • Density vs. Isp • Propellant Mass vs. Volume Warning: Contents deal with math, • Area Ratio physics and thermodynamics. Be afraid…be very afraid… Terms A Area a Acceleration F Force (thrust) g Gravity constant (32.2 ft/sec2) I Impulse m Mass P Pressure Subscripts t Time a Ambient T Temperature c Chamber e Exit V Velocity o Initial state r Reaction ∆ Delta / Difference s Stagnation sp Specific ε Area Ratio t Throat or Total γ Ratio of specific heats Thrust (1/3) Rocket thrust can be explained using Newton’s 2nd and 3rd laws of motion. 2nd Law: a force applied to a body is equal to the mass of the body and its acceleration in the direction of the force.
    [Show full text]
  • 20140002716.Pdf
    Liquid Propulsion Systems – Evolution & Advancements Launch Vehicle Propulsion & Systems LPTC Liquid Propulsion Technical Committee Rick Ballard Liquid Engine Systems Lead SLS Liquid Engines Office NASA / MSFC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted, unless for course participation and to a paid course student, in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of AIAA and/or course instructor. Contact the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Professional Development Program, Suite 500, 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, VA 20191-4344 Modules 1. Rocket Propulsion Fundamentals 2. LRE Applications 3. Liquid Propellants 4. Engine Power Cycles 5. Engine Components Module 1: Rocket Propulsion TOPICS Fundamentals • Thrust • Specific Impulse • Mixture Ratio • Isp vs. MR • Density vs. Isp • Propellant Mass vs. Volume Warning: Contents deal with math, • Area Ratio physics and thermodynamics. Be afraid…be very afraid… Terms A Area a Acceleration F Force (thrust) g Gravity constant (32.2 ft/sec2) I Impulse m Mass P Pressure Subscripts t Time a Ambient T Temperature c Chamber e Exit V Velocity o Initial state r Reaction ∆ Delta / Difference s Stagnation sp Specific ε Area Ratio t Throat or Total γ Ratio of specific heats Thrust (1/3) Rocket thrust can be explained using Newton’s 2nd and 3rd laws of motion. 2nd Law: a force applied to a body is equal to the mass of the body and its acceleration in the direction of the force. F ma 3rd Law: For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept Design of a Split Flow Liquid Hydrogen Turbopump
    Air Force Institute of Technology AFIT Scholar Theses and Dissertations Student Graduate Works 3-17-2008 The Concept Design of a Split Flow Liquid Hydrogen Turbopump Michael A. Arguello Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.afit.edu/etd Part of the Aerospace Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Arguello, Michael A., "The Concept Design of a Split Flow Liquid Hydrogen Turbopump" (2008). Theses and Dissertations. 2672. https://scholar.afit.edu/etd/2672 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Graduate Works at AFIT Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of AFIT Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Equation Chapter 1 Section 1 THE CONCEPT DESIGN OF A SPLIT FLOW LIQUID HYDROGEN TURBOPUMP THESIS Michael A. Arguello, Captain, USAF AFIT/GAE/ENY/08-M01 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR UNIVERSITY AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. AFIT/GAE/ENY/08-M01 THE CONCEPT DESIGN OF A SPLIT FLOW LIQUID HYDROGEN TURBOPUMP THESIS Presented to the Faculty Department of Aeronautical Engineering Graduate School of Engineering and Management Air Force Institute of Technology Air University Air Education and Training Command In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Aeronautical Engineering Michael A.
    [Show full text]
  • CECE: Expanding the Envelope of Deep Throttling Technology in Liquid Oxygen/Liquid Hydrogen Rocket Engines for NASA Exploration Missions
    CECE: Expanding the Envelope of Deep Throttling Technology in Liquid Oxygen/Liquid Hydrogen Rocket Engines for NASA Exploration Missions Victor J. Giuliano1, Timothy G. Leonard2, and Randy T. Lyda3 Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne, West Palm Beach, FL 33410 and Tony S. Kim4 NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL 35812 As one of the first technology development programs awarded by NASA under the Vision for Space Exploration, the Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne (PWR) Deep Throttling, Common Extensible Cryogenic Engine (CECE) program was selected by NASA in November 2004 to begin technology development and demonstration toward a deep throttling, cryogenic engine supporting ongoing trade studies for NASA’s Lunar Lander descent stage. The CECE program leverages the maturity and previous investment of a flight-proven hydrogen/oxygen expander cycle engine, the PWR RL10, to develop and demonstrate an unprecedented combination of reliability, safety, durability, throttlability, and restart capabilities in high- energy, cryogenic, in-space propulsion. The testbed selected for the deep throttling demonstration phases of this program was a minimally modified RL10 engine, allowing for maximum current production engine commonality and extensibility with minimum program cost. Four series of demonstrator engine tests have been successfully completed between April 2006 and April 2010, accumulating 7,436 seconds of hot fire time over 47 separate tests. While the first two test series explored low power combustion (chug) and system instabilities, the third test series investigated and was ultimately successful in demonstrating several mitigating technologies for these instabilities and achieved a stable throttling ratio of 13:1. The fourth test series significantly expanded the engine’s operability envelope by successfully demonstrating a closed-loop control system and extensive transient modeling to enable lower power engine starting, faster throttle ramp rates, and mission-specific ignition testing.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of an Oxygen Turbopump for a Dual Expander Cycle Rocket Engine
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by AFTI Scholar (Air Force Institute of Technology) Air Force Institute of Technology AFIT Scholar Theses and Dissertations Student Graduate Works 3-2008 Design of an Oxygen Turbopump for a Dual Expander Cycle Rocket Engine William S. Strain Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.afit.edu/etd Part of the Propulsion and Power Commons Recommended Citation Strain, William S., "Design of an Oxygen Turbopump for a Dual Expander Cycle Rocket Engine" (2008). Theses and Dissertations. 2691. https://scholar.afit.edu/etd/2691 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Graduate Works at AFIT Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of AFIT Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DESIGN OF AN OXYGEN TURBOPUMP FOR A DUAL EXPANDER CYCLE ROCKET ENGINE THESIS William S. Strain, Captain, USAF AFIT/GAE/ENY/08-M26 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR UNIVERSITY AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. AFIT/GAE/ENY/08-M26 DESIGN OF AN OXYGEN TURBOPUMP FOR A DUAL EXPANDER CYCLE ROCKET ENGINE THESIS Presented to the Faculty Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Graduate School of Engineering and Management Air Force Institute of Technology Air University Air Education and Training Command In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Aeronautical Engineering William S.
    [Show full text]
  • METZTLI Report, Would Like to Express Our Sincere Thanks to Those Individuals and Organisations That Supported Us, in Particular
    i The International Space University (ISU), France Host of the 2003 Summer Session Programme 7th July – 6th September 2003 Front Cover: ‘… the Clavius Crater, Tycho, and the surface of the Moon’ Inside Front Cover: Adapted from Apollo 11 image of the Moon Back Cover: ‘… the ISS approaching an orbital sunset’ Source of all Images: NASA Archives International Space University Strasbourg Central Campus Parc d'Innovation 1 rue Jean-Dominique Cassini 67400 Illkirch-Graffenstaden France Tel: +33 (0)3 88 65 54 30 Fax: +33 (0)3 88 65 54 47 www.isunet.edu The International Space University, Copyright 2003 ii Dedication For all past, present, and future explorers iii List of Authors Surname Name Country of Origin Current Occupation Abiko Satoko Japan Ph.D. Student in Space Robotics Tohoku University, Japan Amaldi Andrea Italy Project Controller, ESA Human Spaceflight Dir. The Netherlands Barr Yael Israel Medical Doctor Israeli Aerospace Medicine Institute, Israel Belin de Eric France Ph.D. Student Space Cardiovascular Physiology Chantemèle Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, France Bonnewijn Sabrina Belgium Mechanical Engineer (Aerospace and Aeronautics) Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium Chen Diane Canada Software Product Assurance Engineer MD Robotics, Canada Dewhurst Brian USA Staff Officer, Board on Physics and Astronomy National Research Council, USA Eley Serena USA B.Sc. in Physics California Institute of Technology, USA Englund Dirk Germany/USA Ph.D. Student in Applied Physics Stanford University, USA Faiyetole Ayodele Nigeria Student, Master of Space Studies 2003-2004 International Space University, France Fontaine Sylvie France Design Engineer, Ariane 5 Solid Propellant Booster Systems, EADS Space Transportation, Bordeaux, France Gebic Kemal Turkey Master’s Space Technologies Application, France; Graduate Physics, France; Graduate Astronomy, Turkey Grafe Mathias Germany M.Sc.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Status of the Pratt & Whitney RL60 Engine
    Program Status of the Pratt & Whitney RL60 Engine J.R. Bullock, M. Popp, J.R. Santiago Pratt & Whitney Space Propulsion P.O. Box 109600 West Palm Beach, Florida 33410-9600 Abstract Introduction Pratt & Whitney’s RL10 engine, in a variety of There are two versions of the RL10 in models, has been the cryogenic powerplant for production at Pratt & Whitney at this time. The high-energy upper stages in US expendable RL10A-4 powers both the single engine version launch vehicles for over thirty years. In and the dual engine version of the Centaur upper preparation for future vehicle upgrades, Pratt & stage for the Lockheed Martin Atlas II, Atlas III Whitney has started the development of a next and Atlas V vehicles. The RL10B-2 powers the generation cryogenic upper stage engine upper stage of both the Delta III and Delta IV providing higher performance while maintaining vehicles, built by Boeing. As of this writing, 492 the same installation envelope as the RL10. The RL10’s have been produced and have an Pratt & Whitney RL60 is an advanced liquid accumulated 636 in-space firings. oxygen/liquid hydrogen (LOX/LH2) expander cycle engine incorporating several key Payloads have continued to grow in mass over technologies to increase performance and the history of expendable vehicles, both because operability while maintaining RL10 reignition of need and because of improved vehicle capability, life and reliability. capability. The new expendable vehicles have been developed to offer increased payload Engine performance is characterized by a thrust capability at lower launch costs, while range of 40 to 60 k-lbf, with a 10% growth incorporating improvements in reliability and margin, and a specific impulse of 465 seconds.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Thermal Propulsion:Stennis Space Center System Overview and Ground Test Strategy Presented By: David Coote, NASA/SSC
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20170011172 2019-06-12T09:01:31+00:00Z Space Technology Mission Directorate Game Changing Development Program National Aeronautics and Space Administration Low Enriched Uranium (LEU) Nuclear Thermal Propulsion:Stennis Space Center System Overview and Ground Test Strategy Presented by: David Coote, NASA/SSC JANNAF Programmatic and Industrial Base Testing and Evaluation Technical Interchange Meeting Kennedy Space Center, FL November 8, 2017 Background How Does Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) Work? SPACE TECH’S GAME CHANGING DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Propellant heated directly by a nuclear reactor and thermally expanded/accelerated through a nozzle Low molecular weight propellant – typically Hydrogen Specific Impulse directly related to exhaust temperature, e.g.: 2850K exhaust temperature translates to ~900 sec Isp Major Elements of a Nuclear Thermal Rocket XE-Prime Nuclear Thermal JANNAF PIB T&E TIM 2 at KSC (08-Nov-17) Rocket Prototype Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) Game Changing Development Project Overview Project Description: • Determine Low Enriched Uranium (LEU) NTP feasibility and affordability, with good cost and schedule confidence, prior to a decision to proceed with full scale development. • Demonstrate the technology that enables the development of high temperature, minimum erosion/fission product release fuel elements (FE) using LEU. • Leverages government, industry and academic expertise and existing facilities. Roles and Responsibilities • MSFC: PM, SE & Analysis Lead, Cryo ConOps Lead, FE Testing • GRC: Cryocooler Testing, Cryo ConOps Support, Sys. Analysis Support • SSC: Rocket Exhaust Capture System DDT&E • KSC: Ground Processing ConOps / Propellant Densification • Aerojet Rocketdyne: LEU Engine Analysis • AMA: Engine Cost Lead • Aerospace: Engine Cost Independent Review • BWXT: Fuel Element / Reactor Design/Fabrication • DOE: FE / Reactor Design and Fabrication Support Full Funding Profile (all years): FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 Total • Budget vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Single-Shaft Turbopumps in Liquid Propellant Rocket Engines
    42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit AIAA 2006-4377 9 - 12 July 2006, Sacramento, California Single-Shaft Turbopumps in Liquid Rocket Engines Y. Demyanenko1, A. Dmitrenko2, V. Rachuk3, A.Shostak4 Konstruktorskoe Buro Khimavtomatiyi, Voronezh, Russia A. Minick5, R. Bracken, M. Buser Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne, West Palm Beach, USA The article describes the evolution of design of main turbopump assemblies (TPA) in liquid rocket engines (LREs) developed by Chemical Automatics Design Bureau (KBKhA). The merits and limitations of single-shaft and double-shaft TPA configurations are analyzed. The major design distinctions of single shaft TPAs are: − the execution of fuel and oxidizer pumps and turbine in a single unit; − a mechanical link of pump rotors and the utilization of a single common turbine; − identical rotation speeds of pump rotors. Separate oxidizer and fuel TPAs with different rotation speeds and dedicated turbines are classified as double-shaft TPAs. Single-shaft and double-shaft TPA configurations implemented in the RD-120, SSME and RD-0146 engines are described. The criteria used in selecting single-shaft and double-shaft TPA configurations are provided. Progress achieved in the area of hydrogen TPA development is demonstrated based on hydrogen TPAs developed at KBKhA at various times for two engines of similar thrust class: the RD-0410 nuclear rocket engine (NRE) and expander cycle-based RD- 0146 liquid rocket engine. Key hydrogen TPA technologies, like powder metallurgy and techniques that ensure operability of rotors between 2nd and 3rd critical speeds, are described. Utilizing powder metallurgy, KBKhA was able to raise fracture speed of impellers in a hydrogen environment up to 930 m/sec and fracture speed of turbine rotors at normal temperature up to 810 m/sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of a Dual-Expander Aerospike Nozzle Rocket
    DESIGN OF A DUAL-EXPANDER AEROSPIKE NOZZLE ROCKET ENGINE by ERIC STEPHEN MCVAY RICHARD D. BRANAM, COMMITTEE CHAIR JOHN BAKER PATRICK R. LECLAIR A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics in the Graduate School of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2016 Copyright Eric Stephen McVay 2016 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT The University of Alabama’s Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics Department is developing a computational dual-expander aerospike nozzle (DEAN) upper stage rocket engine to demonstrate the engine’s performance capabilities and to establish a model by which the DEAN can be built. This research expands the base model developed by the Air Force Institute of Technology to more accurately represent the physics involved in both the fluid flow and geometrical properties of the engine. The DEAN engine was modeled using NASA’s Numerical Propulsion System Simulation (NPSS) and Chemical Equilibrium with Applications (CEA) software. The methodology implemented in this research was validated by modeling the RL- 10A-3-3A upper stage engine in NPSS and comparing resulting outputs with NASA’s ROCket Engine Transient Simulator (ROCETS) analysis. The DEAN uses liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen as its propellant and is being designed to produce a thrust of 30,000 [lbf] and a specific impulse of at least 465.5 [s], at an oxidizer-to-fuel ratio of 5.88, while also remaining within the size envelope of the RL-10B-2 upper stage engine. The performance and size objectives were established to meet the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) Advanced Upper Stage Engine Program (AUSEP) need for an upper stage rocket engine to replace the aging RL-10 series engines that have been in production since the 1960s.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of an Oxygen Turbopump for a Dual Expander Cycle Rocket Engine
    DESIGN OF AN OXYGEN TURBOPUMP FOR A DUAL EXPANDER CYCLE ROCKET ENGINE THESIS William S. Strain, Captain, USAF AFIT/GAE/ENY/08-M26 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR UNIVERSITY AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. AFIT/GAE/ENY/08-M26 DESIGN OF AN OXYGEN TURBOPUMP FOR A DUAL EXPANDER CYCLE ROCKET ENGINE THESIS Presented to the Faculty Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Graduate School of Engineering and Management Air Force Institute of Technology Air University Air Education and Training Command In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Aeronautical Engineering William S. Strain, BS Captain, USAF March 2008 APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED AFIT/GAE/ENY/08-M26 DESIGN OF AN OXYGEN TURBOPUMP FOR A DUAL EXPANDER CYCLE ROCKET ENGINE William S. Strain, BS Captain, USAF Approved: ____________________________________ ________ Richard D. Brannam, Maj, USAF (Chairman) Date ____________________________________ ________ Robert B. Greendyke (Member) Date ____________________________________ ________ Paul I. King (Member) Date Acknowledgments I would like to express my sincere appreciation to my faculty advisor, Maj Richard Branam, for his guidance and support throughout the course of this thesis effort. The insight, experience and help was greatly appreciated. I would also like to thank Capt Michael Arguello for his help with aesthetic issues and for serving as a sounding board during the design process.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation
    Federal Aviation Administration 2007 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts: Vehicles, Technologies, and Spaceports January 2007 HQ-002407.INDD 2007 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts About FAA/AST About the Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA/AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 49 United States Code, Subtitle IX, Chapter 701 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA/AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA/AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA/AST’s web site at http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/. Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation i About FAA/AST 2007 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. ii Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation 2007 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts Contents Table of Contents Introduction . .1 Space Competitions . .1 Expendable Launch Vehicle Industry . .2 Reusable Launch Vehicle Industry .
    [Show full text]