DOCSLIB.ORG

The Human GLP-1 Analogs Liraglutide and Semaglutide: Absence of Histopathological Effects on the Pancreas in Nonhuman Primates

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Human GLP-1 Analogs Liraglutide and Semaglutide: Absence of Histopathological Effects on the Pancreas in Nonhuman Primates 2486 Diabetes Volume 63, July 2014 Carsten F. Gotfredsen, Anne-Marie Mølck, Inger Thorup, Niels C. Berg Nyborg, Zaki Salanti, Lotte Bjerre Knudsen, and Marianne O. Larsen The Human GLP-1 Analogs Liraglutide and Semaglutide: Absence of Histopathological Effects on the Pancreas in Nonhuman Primates Diabetes 2014;63:2486–2497 | DOI: 10.2337/db13-1087 Increased pancreas mass and glucagon-positive ade- and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists nomas have been suggested to be a risk associated (GLP-1RAs). This concern is partly based on the well- with sitagliptin or exenatide therapy in humans. Novo described effect of GLP-1 to induce growth of pancre- Nordisk has conducted extensive toxicology studies, atic b-cells (1). Both drug classes increase effective including data on pancreas weight and histology, in GLP-1 levels, but to a different degree, and have different Cynomolgus monkeys dosed with two different human modes of action; thus, it is important to differentiate glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists. In a between them, particularly when considering mechanistic 52-week study with liraglutide, a dose-related increase hypotheses for potential safety concerns or signals. GLP- in absolute pancreas weight was observed in female 1RAs mediate their effects directly through the GLP-1R monkeys only. Such dose-related increase was not (2,3). Although increased levels of GLP-1 and glucose- found in studies of 4, 13, or 87 weeks’ duration. No dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) are considered treatment-related histopathological abnormalities were important parts of the mechanism of action of DPP-4is observed in any of the studies. Quantitative histology of (4), DPP-4 is known to degrade many other hormones (5). PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS the pancreas from the 52-week study showed an in- DPP-4is have been shown to increase GLP-1, GIP, and crease in the exocrine cell mass in liraglutide-dosed peptide YY (6,7). This complicates the understanding of animals, with normal composition of endocrine and exo- crine cellular compartments. Proliferation rate of the both desired and potentially undesired effects of this class exocrine tissue was low and comparable between of compounds. Within GLP-1RAs, differences exist in groups. Endocrine cell mass and proliferation rates were safety-related parameters. One subgroup is the exendin- – unaltered by liraglutide treatment. Semaglutide showed 4 based drugs with exenatide and lixisenatide, which are no increase in pancreas weight and no treatment- structurally distinct from human GLP-1. Owing to the low related histopathological findings in the pancreas after amino acid homology to native human GLP-1, these med- 13 or 52 weeks’ dosing. Overall, results in 138 nonhuman ications are associated with an increased number of im- primates showed no histopathological changes in the mune reactions that are, however, all of a relatively mild pancreas associated with liraglutide or semaglutide, form, that is, mostly antibody development, injection two structurally different GLP-1 receptor agonists. site nodules, and loss of efficacy (8,9). The other sub- group is based on human GLP-1 and contains liraglutide, Pancreas safety has become a subject of much debate con- taspoglutide, and larger covalently conjugated molecules cerning dipeptidylpeptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (DPP-4is) such as albiglutide and dulaglutide. Clinical development Diabetes Research Unit, Novo Nordisk, Måløv, Denmark © 2014 by the American Diabetes Association. See http://creativecommons.org Corresponding author: Lotte Bjerre Knudsen, [email protected]. /licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details. Received 11 July 2013 and accepted 18 February 2014. See accompanying article, p. 2219. This article contains Supplementary Data online at http://diabetes .diabetesjournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.2337/db13-1087/-/DC1. diabetes.diabetesjournals.org Gotfredsen and Associates 2487 of taspoglutide was stopped due to severe immune-related RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS side effects, with cases of anaphylactic shock, possibly The research design and methods for liraglutide stud- fi caused by the formulation (8,10). No such ndings have ies in Cynomolgus monkeys have been described pre- – been reported with other GLP-1 based analogs. viously (13). All animals were examined daily for Semaglutide is a once-weekly GLP-1 analog that is in clinical signs in the in-life phase. Studies with sema- phase 3 clinical development (11). Where liraglutide is glutide were generally performed similarly, and both acylated with a palmitic acid and has an extra amino followed international guidelines provided by Interna- acid as a spacer between the palmitic acid and the Lys26, tional Conference of Harmonization. Dose levels, du- where the fatty acid is attached, semaglutide is acylated ration, and group sizes for all studies are described in with a stearic diacid at Lys26 but has a much larger syn- Fig. 1. Compounds were administered as subcutaneous thetic spacer and is, furthermore, modified for DPP-4 sta- injections. bility in position 8, where the amino acid a-aminobutyric acid has been introduced. Body Weight and Pancreas Weight In support of drug development and regulatory ap- Terminal body weight was obtained in sedated animals proval for treatment of chronic diseases, repeat dose immediately before they were killed. The entire pancreas toxicity and carcinogenicity studies are conducted. These of each animal was examined macroscopically for any ab- studies are performed at different dosing durations to normalities, excised, cleaned of fat and connective tissue, support the different phases of clinical development and and weighed. with doses aiming to obtain exposure several multiples higher than the clinically relevant exposure with the aim Tissue Preparation to identify potential drug-related organ toxicity and A transverse section from themidpartofthepancreas carcinogenicity. Repeat dose toxicity studies are typically from all animals was sampled, and this section and the fi conducted in a rodent and a nonrodent species. For rest of the pancreata were xed in 10% neutral buffered liraglutide and semaglutide, Cynomolgus monkeys were formalin for at least 48 h. The sections were dehydrated fi chosen as the nonrodent species. Repeat dose toxicity and paraf n-embedded according to standard histopath- studies in nonhuman primates are designed to screen ological procedures. According to international standard for potential hazards and are not designed or statistically practices, one section per animal was cut at a nominal thickness of 4–5 mm and stained with hematoxylin and powered for identification of differences in the incidence eosin (17). The slides were read unblinded because this is or severity of individual organ changes. The number of recommended by toxicopathology experts as a way to nonhuman primates per group is limited to three to five increase the chance of separating subtle changes from for ethical reasons (12). Because of the statistical limita- normal background changes (18). Further details of tions, standardization of the examinations is critical: If the methodology have been previously described (13). pathological findings are identified at a frequency or se- The pancreas specimens from animals killed at termina- verity exceeding those in the in-study control group, they tion of dosing in the 52-week liraglutide study were are often compared with historical control data to assist a fi fi evaluated by quantitative histology (all groups for -cells interpreting the signi cance of the nding. This principle and Ki-67, and only vehicle and high-dose groups for b-, fi also applies to organ weights. Histopathological ndings d-, pancreatic polypeptide [PP], ductal, and acinar cells). in the pancreas from the repeat-dose studies in rodents The cranial and caudal remnants were sectioned longi- and nonhuman primates and from carcinogenicity studies tudinally, cut into ;40 pieces, and distributed to four in rodents with liraglutide have been published previously capsules, with one-fourth in each, according to the (13). Liraglutide was not found to have a causal relation- smooth fractionator principle (19,20). Processing and fi ship to any histopathological ndings. staining for detection of b-, a-, d-, and PP cells was Some studies in rats and mice have shown an increased done as previously described (21). The reactivity of the pancreas weight induced by DPP-4is or GLP-1RAs (14,15), primary antibodies to insulin, glucagon, somatostatin, and a recent ex vivo study with human pancreata sug- and PP in monkey pancreas had been tested indi- gested an increase in glucagonomas as well as increased vidually to validate the method. Costaining for duct pancreas weight (16). Here, pancreas weight in Cynomol- plus acinar cells using mouse anti–CK-7 (Dako, Glostrup, gus monkeys is reported for liraglutide in toxicology stud- Denmark) and rabbit anti–a-amylase (Calbiochem, Darm- ies with 4, 13, 52, and 87 weeks’ dosing, and for stadt, Germany) plus Ki-67 using polyclonal rabbit semaglutide in toxicology studies with 13 and 52 weeks’ anti–Ki-67 (Novus Europe, Cambridge, U.K.) followed dosing, as well as a full histopathological evaluation of thesameprinciplesasabove.Stainedslideswere these same studies, except the 87 weeks’ study, which scanned in a Hamamatsu NanoZoomer 2.0-HT (Hamamatsu, has been reported previously (13). For liraglutide, a full Hamamatsu City, Japan). Images were subsequently ana- quantitative histological assessment of the endocrine as lyzed automatically
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Semaglutide Versus Liraglutide for Treatment of Obesity
    Archives of Diabetes & Obesity DOI: 10.32474/ADO.2021.03.000162 ISSN: 2638-5910 Review Article Semaglutide versus liraglutide for treatment of obesity Nasser Mikhail* *Department of Medicine, Endocrinology Division, David-Geffen UCLA Medical School, USA *Corresponding author: Nasser Mikhail, Endocrinology Division, Department of Medicine, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, David- Geffen UCLA Medical School, CA, USA Received: April 02, 2021 Published: April 19, 2021 Abstract Background: Once weekly (OW) semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) currently under evaluation for treatment of obesity at a dose of 2.4 mg OW. Objective Methods : To compare weight-loss efficacy and safety of once daily (OD) liraglutide 3.0 mg versus OW semaglutide 2.4 mg. : Pubmed research up to March 31, 2021. Randomized trials, pertinent animal studies, and reviews are included. Search Results terms were glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, weight loss, obesity, liraglutide, semaglutide, efficacy, safety. semaglutide 2.4 mg. However, marked resemblance between trials in terms of study protocols and subjects’ characteristics may allow indirect: No comparison. head to head In clinical trials are trials available of OW tosemaglutide, provide direct this comparison drug was consistently of efficacy ofassociated OD liraglutide with greater 3.0 mg weightversus lossOW than in trials of OD liraglutide. Thus, placebo-corrected percentage weight reduction was -10.3 to -12.4% and -5.4% with OW semaglutide and OD liraglutide, respectively. In patients with type 2 diabetes, corresponding weight reduction was less pronounced with both drugs being -6.2% and -4.3% with OW semaglutide and OD liraglutide, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
    Cognitive Vitality Reports® are reports written by neuroscientists at the Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF). These scientific reports include analysis of drugs, drugs-in- development, drug targets, supplements, nutraceuticals, food/drink, non-pharmacologic interventions, and risk factors. Neuroscientists evaluate the potential benefit (or harm) for brain health, as well as for age-related health concerns that can affect brain health (e.g., cardiovascular diseases, cancers, diabetes/metabolic syndrome). In addition, these reports include evaluation of safety data, from clinical trials if available, and from preclinical models. GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Evidence Summary GLP-1 agonists are beneficial for patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity. Some evidence suggests benefits for Alzheimer’s disease. It is unclear whether it is beneficial for individuals without underlying metabolic disease. Semaglutide seems to be most effective for metabolic dysfunction, though liraglutide has more preclinical data for Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroprotective Benefit: Evidence from many preclinical studies and a pilot biomarker study suggest some neuroprotective benefits with GLP-1 agonists. However, whether they may be beneficial for everyone or only a subset of individuals (e.g. diabetics) is unclear. Aging and related health concerns: GLP-1 agonists are beneficial for treating diabetes and cardiovascular complications relating to diabetes. It is not clear whether they have beneficial effects in otherwise healthy individuals. Safety: GLP-1 agonists are generally safe for most people with minor side effects. However, long-term side effects are not known. 1 Availability: Available Dose: Varies - see Chemical formula: C172H265N43O51 (Liraglutide) as a prescription chart at the end of MW: 3751.262 g/mol medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • A 26-Week Randomized Controlled Trial of Semaglutide Once Daily Versus Liraglutide and Placebo in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
    1926 Diabetes Care Volume 41, September 2018 Ildiko Lingvay,1 Cyrus V. Desouza,2 A 26-Week Randomized Katarina S. Lalic,3 Ludger Rose,4 Thomas Hansen,5 Jeppe Zacho,5 and Controlled Trial of Semaglutide Thomas R. Pieber6 EMERGING THERAPIES: DRUGS AND REGIMENS Once Daily Versus Liraglutide and Placebo in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Suboptimally Controlled on Diet and Exercise With or Without Metformin Diabetes Care 2018;41:1926–1937 | https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-2381 OBJECTIVE To investigate the efficacy and safety of once-daily semaglutide in comparison with once-daily liraglutide and placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This 26-week, multicenter, double-blind trial involved patients diagnosed with 1University of Texas Southwestern Medical Cen- type 2 diabetes with HbA1c 7.0–10.0% (53–86 mmol/mol) and treated with diet ter at Dallas, Dallas, TX and exercise with or without metformin. Patients were randomized 2:2:1 to once- 2University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, daily semaglutide, liraglutide, or placebo in one of four volume-matched doses NE 3Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, and (semaglutide 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, or 0.3 mg and liraglutide 0.3, 0.6, 1.2, or 1.8 mg, with Clinic for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic both compared within each volume-matched dose group). Primary end point was Diseases, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26. 4Institute for Diabetes Research in Munster,¨ RESULTS Munster,¨ Germany 5Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark In total, 705 randomized patients were exposed to trial products.
    [Show full text]
  • OZEMPIC (Semaglutide) Injection, for Subcutaneous Use Initial U.S
    HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙CONTRAINDICATIONS∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ These highlights do not include all the information needed to use Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or in patients OZEMPIC® safely and effectively. See full prescribing information with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia syndrome type 2 (4). for OZEMPIC. Known hypersensitivity to OZEMPIC or any of the product components (4). OZEMPIC (semaglutide) injection, for subcutaneous use Initial U.S. Approval: 2017 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙ Pancreatitis: Has been reported in clinical trials. Discontinue promptly if WARNING: RISK OF THYROID C-CELL TUMORS pancreatitis is suspected. Do not restart if pancreatitis is confirmed (5.2). See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. Diabetic Retinopathy Complications: Has been reported in a clinical trial. Patients with a history of diabetic retinopathy should be monitored (5.3). In rodents, semaglutide causes thyroid C-cell tumors. It is Never share an OZEMPIC pen between patients, even if the needle is unknown whether OZEMPIC causes thyroid C-cell tumors, changed (5.4). including medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), in humans as Hypoglycemia: When OZEMPIC is used with an insulin secretagogue or the human relevance of semaglutide-induced rodent thyroid C- insulin, consider lowering the dose of the secretagogue or insulin to reduce cell tumors has not been determined (5.1, 13.1). the risk of hypoglycemia (5.5). OZEMPIC is contraindicated in patients with a personal or Acute Kidney Injury: Monitor renal function in patients with renal family history of MTC or in patients with Multiple Endocrine impairment reporting severe adverse gastrointestinal reactions (5.6). Neoplasia syndrome type 2 (MEN 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Albiglutide Needs Greater Accuracy from Remaining Shots on Goal
    November 18, 2011 Albiglutide needs greater accuracy from remaining shots on goal Evaluate Vantage Victoza is looking increasingly bullet-proof. Novo Nordisk’s once-daily GLP-1 agonist proved superior to GlaxoSmithKline’s once-weekly version, albiglutide, in reducing blood glucose while also showing significant weight loss advantages in type II diabetics. This follows a similar win for Victoza against Amylin Pharmaceuticals’ once-weekly challenger in Bydureon (Amylin scores own goal in Bydureon vs Victoza head-to- head study, March 3, 2011). Albiglutide still has a number of shots on goal – data this week from the Harmony 7 trial was the first from eight phase III studies all nearing completion – with a head-to-head against Merck & Co’s DPP-IV inhibitor Januvia probably the most significant in terms of determining albiglutide’s future role and potential in the diabetes market. Although expectations have never been that high, Glaxo’s product had an opportunity to capitalise on the setbacks to Byetta, Bydureon and Roche’s once-weekly taspoglutide – this first trial read out suggests that opportunity will be limited at best or missed altogether. Playing catch up Glaxo’s decision almost three years ago to embark on an extensive phase III programme for albiglutide, branded Syncria at the time, was seen as a bit of a gamble (Glaxo makes brave decision with phase III trials for Syncria, February 17, 2009). Safety concerns about Amylin’s twice-daily Byetta, the only approved GLP-1 agonist at the time, and the fact albiglutide had a lot of ground to make up on Bydureon and taspoglutide, suggested an uphill struggle for Glaxo’s product which was licensed from Human Genome Sciences in 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Subcutaneous Semaglutide, Dulaglutide and Liraglutide 1.2Mg for the Treatment of Type
    North Central London Joint Formulary Committee Factsheet Subcutaneous SEMAGLUTIDE▼ (Ozempic®), DULAGLUTIDE▼ (Trulicity®) and LIRAGLUTIDE 1.2mg (Victoza®) Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Start date: December 2019 Review date: August 2022 Document Control Date Version Action July 2016 1.0 New guideline August 2019 1.1 Subcutaneous semaglutide added as the preferred GLP-1 receptor agonist November 2019 1.2 Supply quantities added Agreed by NCL Shared Care Group: December 2019 FACTSHEET TO FACILITATE PRESCRIBING PLEASE NOTE THIS IS NOT A SHARED CARE GUIDELINE, NOR IS IT A FULL SUMMARY OF DRUG INFORMATION. ALWAYS REFER TO THE MOST RECENT BNF AND/OR SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS. Disclaimer This Fact Sheet is registered at North Central London (NCL) Joint Formulary Committee (JFC) and is intended solely for use by healthcare professionals to aid the treatment of patients within NCL. However, this fact sheet is for guidance only, its interpretation and application remains the responsibility of the individual clinician. If in doubt, contact a senior colleague or expert. Clinicians are advised to refer to the manufacturer’s current prescribing information before treating individual patients. The authors and NCL JFC accept no liability for use of this information from this beyond its intended use. While we have tried to compile accurate information in this document, and to keep it updated in a timely manner, we cannot guarantee that it is fully complete and correct at all times. If you identify information within this document that is inaccurate, please report this to the [email protected]. If a patient is harmed as a consequence of following this document, please complete a local incident report and inform [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Diabetes Recommendations and Tier Coverage Chart
    DIABETES RECOMMENDATIONS AND TIER COVERAGE CHART The American Diabetes Association guidelines for 2020, recommend metformin as the preferred initial treatment for type 2 diabetes (T2DM) along with weight management and physical activity. In patients who have established ASVD or at high risk, CKD, or HF, a SGLT2i or GLP-1 receptor with proven efficacy is recommended independent of A1C. • ASCVD dominates: o GLP-1RA with proven CVD benefit (dulaglutide, liraglutide, injectable semaglutide) OR o SGLT2i with proven CVD benefit (canagliflozin, empagliflozin) if adequate eGFR • HF or CKD dominates: o SGLT2i with evidence of reducing HF and/or CKD progression (empagliflozin, canagliflozin, dapagliflozin) if adequate eGFR OR o If SGLT2i intolerant/contraindicated or eGFR is inadequate, then GLP-1RA with proven CVD benefit In individuals without established cardiovascular disease, pharmacological treatment should be patient-centered taking into account side-effects, cost, impact on weight, risk of hypoglycemia, and other patient preferences. For more detailed information regarding ADA recommendations for pharmacological agents to treat T2DM click here. The following chart is a list of oral and injectable diabetes medications listed by class with their respective A1C reduction and insurance coverage and/or coverage requirements for BCBS, HPHC, Tufts, TMP, and MassHealth. Tufts Medicare Medications BCBSMA HPHC Tufts Preferred MassHealth Biguanides A1C reduction: 1-1.5% metformin Tier 1 Tier 1;2 Tier 1 Tier 1 Covered Glucoghage (metformin) NC NC NC;Tier
    [Show full text]
  • Victoza® (Liraglutide) Injection LEADER: Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results
    Novo Nordisk Victoza® (liraglutide) NDA 22341 S-027 Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drug Advisory Committee, June 20, 2017 Victoza® (liraglutide) injection LEADER: Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results NDA 22341 S-027 Briefing Document Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drug Advisory Committee June 20, 2017 Advisory Committee Briefing Materials: Available for Public Release Novo Nordisk Victoza® (liraglutide) NDA 22341 S-027 Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drug Advisory Committee, June 20, 2017 2 of 95 1 Executive summary Introduction Liraglutide is an analog with 97% homology to human glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and acts as a GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA). Liraglutide (Victoza®) obtained marketing authorization in the United States (US) in 2010 and is currently approved in over 100 countries worldwide. In the US, Victoza® (for subcutaneous injection 1.2 mg and 1.8 mg once-daily) is indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as mono- or combination therapy.1 The exposure to Victoza® in the post-marketing setting is extensive; as of 30 June 2016, the cumulative exposure was estimated to be greater than 6 million patient-years of exposure to Victoza®. The LEADER trial (Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results) was a cardiovascular outcomes trial designed and conducted to determine the effect and long-term safety of liraglutide versus placebo on cardiovascular outcomes as
    [Show full text]
  • Combination Use of Insulin and Incretins in Type 2 Diabetes
    Canadian Agency for Agence canadienne Drugs and Technologies des médicaments et des in Health technologies de la santé CADTH Optimal Use Report Volume 3, Issue 1C Combination Use of Insulin and July 2013 Incretins in Type 2 Diabetes Supporting Informed Decisions This report is prepared by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH). The report contains a comprehensive review of the existing public literature, studies, materials, and other information and documentation (collectively the “source documentation”) available to CADTH at the time of report preparation. The information in this report is intended to help Canadian health care decision-makers, health care professionals, health systems leaders, and policy-makers make well-informed decisions and thereby improve the quality of health care services. The information in this report should not be used as a substitute for the application of clinical judgment in respect of the care of a particular patient or other professional judgment in any decision-making process, nor is it intended to replace professional medical advice. While CADTH has taken care in the preparation of this document to ensure that its contents are accurate, complete, and up to date as of the date of publication, CADTH does not make any guarantee to that effect. CADTH is not responsible for the quality, currency, propriety, accuracy, or reasonableness of any statements, information, or conclusions contained in the source documentation. CADTH is not responsible for any errors or omissions or injury, loss, or damage arising from or relating to the use (or misuse) of any information, statements, or conclusions contained in or implied by the information in this document or in any of the source documentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy and Safety of Taspoglutide Versus Sitagliptin
    Diabetes Ther (2012) 3:13 DOI 10.1007/s13300-012-0013-8 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Efficacy and Safety of Taspoglutide Versus Sitagliptin for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T-Emerge 4 Trial) Richard M. Bergenstal • Adriana Forti • Jean-Louis Chiasson • Michael Woloschak • Mark Boldrin • Raffaella Balena To view enhanced content go to www.diabetestherapy-open.com Received: August 9, 2012 / Published online: November 9, 2012 Ó The Author(s) 2012. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com ABSTRACT sitagliptin or placebo, as adjunct to metformin, in patients with inadequately Introduction: The efficacy and safety of controlled type 2 diabetes. taspoglutide, a long-acting human glucagon- Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, like peptide-1 analog, were compared with double-dummy, parallel-group trial, patients were randomized to taspoglutide 10 mg once For the T-emerge 4 Study Group. weekly (QW), 20 mg QW, 100 mg sitagliptin Study investigators listed in the Appendix. once daily (QD), or placebo for 24 weeks, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00754988. followed by 28-week short-term and 104-week long-term extension periods. The primary R. M. Bergenstal (&) endpoint was change in glycosylated Park Nicollet International Diabetes Center, hemoglobin (HbA ) after 24 weeks. Minneapolis, MN 55416, USA 1c e-mail: [email protected] Results: In this study, 666 patients (baseline HbA , 7.96% [SD, 0.87]; fasting plasma glucose, A. Forti 1c Universidade Federal do Ceara´, Fortaleza, Brazil 9.61 mmol/L [2.56]; body weight, 92.4 kg [19.3]) were randomized to taspoglutide 10 mg J.-L. Chiasson Centre de Recherche, Centre Hospitalier de QW (n = 190), 20 mg QW (n = 198), l’Universite´ de Montre´al, Universite´ de Montre´al, 100 mg sitagliptin QD (n = 185), or placebo Montreal, QC H2Q 1T8, Canada (n = 93) for 24 weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Semaglutide Vs. Liraglutide Efficacy Profile: a Network Meta
    healthcare Systematic Review Weekly Semaglutide vs. Liraglutide Efficacy Profile: A Network Meta-Analysis Hassan A. Alsugair 1,* , Ibrahim F. Alshugair 2 , Turki J. Alharbi 1,*, Abdulaziz M. Bin Rsheed 1 , Ayla M. Tourkmani 1 and Wedad Al-Madani 3 1 Family Medicine Department, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh 12624, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] (A.M.B.R.); [email protected] (A.M.T.) 2 Orthopedic Surgery Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh 12746, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] 3 General Authority of Statistics, Riyadh 11481, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] (H.A.A.); [email protected] or [email protected] (T.J.A.); Tel.: +966-114777714-40438 (T.J.A.) Abstract: Introduction: Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) is a class of hypo- glycemic medications. Semaglutide once-weekly (QW) and liraglutide once-daily (OD) significantly improved glycemic control compared to placebo. To date, no long-term phase III trials directly comparing semaglutide and liraglutide are available. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to compare the long-term efficacy of semaglutide and liraglutide. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception until June 2019 to identify relevant articles. Nine long-term randomized controlled trials comparing once-weekly semaglutide or liraglutide with placebo or other active comparisons were identified. The outcomes of interest were changes in HbA1c and weight after 52 weeks. A Bayesian framework and NMA were used for data synthesis. Citation: Alsugair, H.A.; This is a sub-study of the protocol registered in PROSPERO (number CRD42018091598).
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Dr Naomi Achong Endocrinologist MBBS(Hons) Bsc FRACP Phd Overview
    Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Dr Naomi Achong Endocrinologist MBBS(Hons) BSc FRACP PhD Overview • Overview of T2DM & glycaemic targets • Treatment after metformin – newer agents on the market • SGLT2 inhibitors • DPP4 agonists • GLP1 antagonists • Insulin options • Newer options – coformulation Diagnosis • ADS position statement • Criteria: • HbA1c > 6.5% • Fasting glucose > 7mmol/L. • Random glucose > 11.1mmol/L • GTT showing fasting > 7 or 2hr > 11.1mmol/L • Patients with IGT have an increased risk of death and vascular disease (regardless of progression to diabetes) as well as microvascular complications • Risk of progression to T2DM is reduced by 58% with lifestyle modification and 31% with metformin 1.The DECODE Study. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161:397-405 2. Singleton JR et al. Diabetes 2003;52(12):2867-2873 3. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. N Engl J Med 2002; 346:393-403 Optimising health outcomes in diabetes • Glucose control • Smoking cessation • Blood pressure control • Lipid management with priority to statins • Some circumstances, antiplatelet therapy ADA/EASD – 2015 position statement • Glycaemic targets need to be individualised • Based on modifiable and non-modifiable factors 1. Inzucchi S.E., Bergenstal R.M., Buse J.B., Diamant M., Ferrannini E., Nauck M. et al Diabetologia. 2015; 58: 429-442 1. Inzucchi S.E. et al. Diabetologia. 2015; 58: 429-442 Importance of glycaemic control GOOD GLYCAEMIC CONTROL Reduces diabetes-related complications Reduces total diabetes-related costs UKPDS1 Retrospective database analysis2 1% mean HbA1c reduction results in: HbA1c ≤7% continuously for 1 year results in . 37% 14% 21% 25% Which included: Myocardial 22% lower diabetes infarction medical costs Diabetes-related 28% lower diabetes mortality Diabetes-related pharmacy costs treatment costs Microvascular complications .
    [Show full text]