DOCSLIB.ORG

Changing Lives with Next Generation Peptide Therapeutics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Changing lives with next generation peptide therapeutics Zealand Pharma Corporate Presentation May 2019 Forward-looking statements This presentation contains information pertaining to Zealand Pharma A/S (“Zealand"). Neither Zealand nor its management, directors, employees or representatives make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of any of the information contained in this presentation or any other information transmitted or made available to the viewer or recipient hereof, whether communicated in written or oral form. This presentation does not constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, an offer to sell or issue or the solicitation of an offer to buy or acquire Zealand securities, in any jurisdiction, or an inducement to enter into investment activity, nor shall there be any sale of Zealand securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction. No part of this presentation, nor the fact of its distribution, should form the basis of, or be relied on in connection with, any contract or commitment or investment decision whatsoever. This presentation contains forward-looking statements that reflect management's current views with respect to Zealand's product candidates' development, clinical and regulatory timelines and anticipated results, market opportunity, potential financial performance and other statements of future events or conditions. Although Zealand believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, no assurance can be given that such expectations will prove to have been correct. Accordingly, results could differ materially from those set out in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, many of which are beyond Zealand’s control. No reliance should be made on such forward-looking statements. Zealand does not intend to update the presentation, including the forward-looking statements contained therein, following distribution, beyond what is required by applicable law or applicable stock exchange regulations if and when circumstances arise that lead to changes compared to the date when these statements were provided. 1 Zealand Pharma in brief Danish Biotech Leading Peptide Platform Three Phase 3 Programs Founded in Copenhagen (HQ) in 1998, A world leading peptide platform, Accelerating several late stage opened U.S. subsidiary 2018 with two medicines on the market programs to launch new products into major markets in 2 to 4 years Expanding Capabilities Experienced Team Dual Nasdaq Listing Transforming into a fully integrated 153 employees of which Traded in Copenhagen biotech company with 87% are in R&D and New York (ZEAL) U.S. commercial organization 2 We change lives with next generation peptide therapeutics Changing Transforming Engaging Approaching Lives Peptides Partnerships Commercialization We work every day with We leverage our 20 years of We engage with development We are building a fully patient communities and experience discovering and and commercial partners to integrated commercial thought leaders to change the developing peptide drugs to enhance innovation and organization with U.S. lives of people with severe transform peptide projects into expand opportunities across operations to market our own medical conditions next generation therapeutics markets and therapeutics areas therapies for rare diseases 3 Developing next generation peptide therapeutics Sources of innovation The Zealand peptide platform Therapeutic opportunities GLP-2 GLP-1 analog analog Peptide libraries Novel peptide drug candidates GLP-1/Glu Glucagon agonist • Physical stability analog Amylin analog • Chemical stability Bio-active peptides GIP • Solubility analog GLP-1/GLP-2 • Potency agonist GIP/GLP-1 Venoms agonist Ion channel blockers Complement C3 inhibitor 4 Optimizing value through internal drug development and partnerships Academic and Contract Research Contract Manufacturing Optimizing Scientific Institutions Organizations (CROs) Organizations (CMOs) Distribution Partners execution across the value chain Internal Drug Development Maintaining full control and value potential Peptide Early and Late Stage Approved Research Platform Drug Development Medicines to Patients Expanding the innovation platform Drug development in Strategic Partnerships 5 2019 Objectives Accelerate our late-stage pipeline • Glepaglutide for short bowel syndrome: 60-80 patients enrolled in Phase 3, on track for 2020 results • Dasiglucagon HypoPal® rescue pen: Clinical program completion and NDA submission to the FDA • Dasiglucagon for dual-hormone pumps: Phase 2 completion • Dasiglucagon for congenital hyperinsulinism: Phase 3 program advancement Advance our early pipeline • Once-weekly GLP-1/GLU: Phase 1 clinical results for obesity/type 2 diabetes1 • Once-weekly Amylin analog: Phase 1 trial initiation for obesity/type 2 diabetes2 • Long-acting GLP-1/GLP-2 dual agonist (ZP7570) for SBS: Phase 1 trial initiation • Complement C3 inhibitor: Pre-clinical development towards Phase 1 initiation in 20203 Expand our strong financial and • Value-adding partnerships for selected fully-owned drug candidates concluded organizational position • Organizational preparedness for commercialization and expansion of U.S. presence • Disciplined financial management with tight cost control 6 1 Partnered with Boehringer Ingelheim. Zealand eligible for EUR 365m in outstanding milestones; 2 Partnered with Boehringer Ingelheim. Zealand eligible for EUR 283m in outstanding milestones. 3 Partnered with Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Zealand eligible for USD 610m in outstanding milestones. Three Phase 3 programs and a promising early pipeline Product Candidate Indication Pre-clinical Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Registration Glepaglutide GLP-2 Analog Short bowel syndrome ZP7570 GLP-1/GLP-2 Dual Agonist Short bowel syndrome Dasiglucagon HypoPal® Rescue Pen Severe hypoglycemia Dasiglucagon Rare Diseases Congenital hyperinsulinism Dasiglucagon Dual-hormone Pump Therapy Diabetes management GLP-1/GLU Dual Agonist Obesity/Type 2 diabetes1 Amylin Analog Obesity/Type 2 diabetes2 Complement C3 Inhibitor Undisclosed3 GIP/GLP-1/Glucagon Mono/Dual/Triple Undisclosed Ion Channel Blockers Undisclosed 7 1 Partnered with Boehringer Ingelheim. Zealand eligible for EUR 365m in outstanding milestones; 2 Partnered with Boehringer Ingelheim. Zealand eligible for EUR 283m in outstanding milestones. 3 Partnered with Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Zealand eligible for USD 610m in outstanding milestones. Marianne lives with short bowel syndrome and is dependent on daily parenteral support 8 Short bowel syndrome is a chronic and debilitating disease affecting up to 40,000 people in the U.S. and Europe1,2 Rare and severe disease Normal person SBS patient Impaired intestinal absorption, Length of Length of diarrhea and metabolic complications3 gastrointestinal tract gastrointestinal tract ~ 8.5 m /~ 25 ft < 2 m /~ 6.5 ft5 Life-long dependency Complex parenteral support to survive and risk of life-threatening infections and extra-organ impairment4 Need for better treatments Faster and reliable treatment for reduction of parenteral support needs 1 Jeppesen P. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs; 1:515-25; 2 Transparency Market Research; Short Bowel Syndrome Market, 2017; 3 Amiot A et al. Clin Nutr 2013;32:368–74; Boland E et al. Am J Surg 2010;200:690–3; 4 Torres C. Current Paediatr 2006;16:291–7; Bielawska B. 9 Nutrients 2017;9:466–79; Pironi L et al. Clin Nutr 2016;352:247–307; Hofstetter S et al. Curr Med Res Opin 2013;29:495–504; 5 Jeppesen PB. J Parenteral Enteral Nutr. 2014;38 (supplement 1):8S-13S. Zealand data on file; ZP-SBS User Research Glepaglutide: a long-acting GLP-2 analog for treatment of short bowel syndrome We aspire to reduce the Effective and well-tolerated in Phase 2, suggesting a fast and reliable treatment1 burden of living with short bowel syndrome by offering Unique drug profile with effective half-life of ~50 hours glepaglutide as a best-in- class GLP-2 treatment Targets once-weekly dosing in an autoinjector Phase 3 ongoing with results expected in 2020 For illustration only 10 1 Zealand Pharma corporate announcement – No. 21/2017 and No. 5/2018 Superior effect of glepaglutide in pre-clinical intestinal models GLP-2 increases intestinal weight Glepaglutide increases intestinal length3 200 80 ** ** ** ** 60 150 40 100 (cm) 20 50 Small Intestinal length Intestinal Small (% over vehicle) increase Small Intestine Wet Intestine Weight Small 0 0 Low High Veh 1 mg/kg 3 mg/kg 10 mg/kg Veh 10 mg/kg Dose 26 w dosing 6 w recovery Apraglutide (30/300 nmol/kg/day) 1 1 Teduglutide (30/300 nmol/kg/day) 26 week dosing followed by 6 week recovery in Wistar rats Glepaglutide (22/225 nmol/kg/day) 2 Data presented Glerup et al., 2018 at UEGW (P0586) Teduglutide (25/250 nmol/kg/day) 2 1- 5 days dosing SD rats. Extracted from Hargrove et al., DDW poster 2011 (Sa1376) 2- 7 day dosing in Wistar rats. Data on file at Zealand (studies 10-176, 11-019 ) 11 1 Extracted from Hargrove et al., DDW poster 2011 (Sa1376). 5 days dosing in SD rats; 2 Zealand data on file (studies 10-176, 11-019). 7 days dosing in Wistar rats; 3 Glerup et al., 2018 at UEGW (P0586) dosing in dogs. Strong Phase 2 data with increases in intestinal absorption following 3 weeks glepaglutide treatment Change in wet weight absorption (g/day)1 Clear dose-response on multiple endpoints1 • Increase in
Recommended publications
  • Semaglutide Versus Liraglutide for Treatment of Obesity

    Semaglutide Versus Liraglutide for Treatment of Obesity

    Archives of Diabetes & Obesity DOI: 10.32474/ADO.2021.03.000162 ISSN: 2638-5910 Review Article Semaglutide versus liraglutide for treatment of obesity Nasser Mikhail* *Department of Medicine, Endocrinology Division, David-Geffen UCLA Medical School, USA *Corresponding author: Nasser Mikhail, Endocrinology Division, Department of Medicine, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, David- Geffen UCLA Medical School, CA, USA Received: April 02, 2021 Published: April 19, 2021 Abstract Background: Once weekly (OW) semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) currently under evaluation for treatment of obesity at a dose of 2.4 mg OW. Objective Methods : To compare weight-loss efficacy and safety of once daily (OD) liraglutide 3.0 mg versus OW semaglutide 2.4 mg. : Pubmed research up to March 31, 2021. Randomized trials, pertinent animal studies, and reviews are included. Search Results terms were glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, weight loss, obesity, liraglutide, semaglutide, efficacy, safety. semaglutide 2.4 mg. However, marked resemblance between trials in terms of study protocols and subjects’ characteristics may allow indirect: No comparison. head to head In clinical trials are trials available of OW tosemaglutide, provide direct this comparison drug was consistently of efficacy ofassociated OD liraglutide with greater 3.0 mg weightversus lossOW than in trials of OD liraglutide. Thus, placebo-corrected percentage weight reduction was -10.3 to -12.4% and -5.4% with OW semaglutide and OD liraglutide, respectively. In patients with type 2 diabetes, corresponding weight reduction was less pronounced with both drugs being -6.2% and -4.3% with OW semaglutide and OD liraglutide, respectively.
  • GLP-1 Receptor Agonists

    GLP-1 Receptor Agonists

    Cognitive Vitality Reports® are reports written by neuroscientists at the Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF). These scientific reports include analysis of drugs, drugs-in- development, drug targets, supplements, nutraceuticals, food/drink, non-pharmacologic interventions, and risk factors. Neuroscientists evaluate the potential benefit (or harm) for brain health, as well as for age-related health concerns that can affect brain health (e.g., cardiovascular diseases, cancers, diabetes/metabolic syndrome). In addition, these reports include evaluation of safety data, from clinical trials if available, and from preclinical models. GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Evidence Summary GLP-1 agonists are beneficial for patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity. Some evidence suggests benefits for Alzheimer’s disease. It is unclear whether it is beneficial for individuals without underlying metabolic disease. Semaglutide seems to be most effective for metabolic dysfunction, though liraglutide has more preclinical data for Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroprotective Benefit: Evidence from many preclinical studies and a pilot biomarker study suggest some neuroprotective benefits with GLP-1 agonists. However, whether they may be beneficial for everyone or only a subset of individuals (e.g. diabetics) is unclear. Aging and related health concerns: GLP-1 agonists are beneficial for treating diabetes and cardiovascular complications relating to diabetes. It is not clear whether they have beneficial effects in otherwise healthy individuals. Safety: GLP-1 agonists are generally safe for most people with minor side effects. However, long-term side effects are not known. 1 Availability: Available Dose: Varies - see Chemical formula: C172H265N43O51 (Liraglutide) as a prescription chart at the end of MW: 3751.262 g/mol medicine.
  • Combining a Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist with Basal Insulin: the Why and How

    Combining a Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist with Basal Insulin: the Why and How

    Combining a Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist with Basal Insulin: The Why and How Case Study Mary is a 61 year-old female diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) 8 years ago. She was initially managed with the combination of lifestyle modification and metformin. Since that time she was treated with a sulfonylurea, but it was discontinued due to symptomatic hypoglycemia. She was also treated with pioglitazone, but significant fluid retention led to it discontinuation. A year-and-a- half ago, basal insulin was added to her lifestyle and metformin management. She now administers 52 units (0.62 units/kg) once daily at bedtime. Since starting basal insulin, she has experienced 3 episodes of mild hypoglycemia. Since her diagnosis, Mary’s HbA1c has never been <7.0%; her current HbA1c is 7.9%. Over the past month, her fasting plasma glucose (FPG) has ranged from 103 mg/dL to 136 mg/dL and her postprandial glucose (PPG) from 164 mg/dL to 213 mg/dL. She has gained 2.6 kg since starting basal insulin and her body mass index is now 31 kg/m2. Her blood pressure is 134/82 mmHg. She experiences occasional tingling in her feet. Eye examination reveals grade 1 retinopathy. Current medications are: metformin 1000mg twice daily, basal insulin 52 units once daily at bedtime, and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg once daily. Her family physician notes that Mary’s FPG is reasonably well-controlled, yet her HbA1c and PPG remain elevated. He is also concerned about her episodes of hypoglycemia and weight gain and the evidence indicating microvascular damage.
  • Performance of the Insulin-Only Ilet Bionic Pancreas and The

    Performance of the Insulin-Only Ilet Bionic Pancreas and The

    e118 Diabetes Care Volume 44, June 2021 Performance of the Insulin-Only Luz E. Castellanos,1 Courtney A. Balliro,1 Jordan S. Sherwood,1 Rabab Jafri,1 iLet Bionic Pancreas and the Mallory A. Hillard,1 Evelyn Greaux,1 Rajendranath Selagamsetty,2 Hui Zheng,3 Bihormonal iLet Using Firas H. El-Khatib,2 Edward R. Damiano,2,4 and Dasiglucagon in Adults With Type Steven J. Russell1 1 Diabetes in a Home-Use Setting Diabetes Care 2021;44:e118–e120 | https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-1086 Reductions in blood glucose levels in with insulin lispro (Eli Lilly) or aspart (Table 1). The mean CGM glucose and people with diabetes are often achieved (Novo Nordisk), the bihormonal iLet for time in range (70–180 mg/dL) were 149 at the expense of increased hypoglyce- 7dayswithdasiglucagon(4mg/mL) ±13mg/dLand72±8%,respectively,in mia. A novel approach is to automati- and insulin lispro or aspart, or both, us- the insulin-only period, and 139 ± 11 cally deliver microdose glucagon when ing the same glucose target (110 mg/ mg/dL and 79 ± 9%, respectively, in the automation of insulin delivery alone is dL), in random order. There were no re- bihormonal period. The mean daily car- not sufficient to prevent hypoglycemia. strictions on diet or exercise. The prima- bohydrates consumed to prevent or The approach requires a bihormonal de- ry outcomes were prespecified iLet treat hypoglycemia were 16 ± 13 g and vice and a stable form of glucagon or operational thresholds. The key second- 18 ± 21 g in the insulin-only and bihor- glucagon analog.
  • A 26-Week Randomized Controlled Trial of Semaglutide Once Daily Versus Liraglutide and Placebo in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

    A 26-Week Randomized Controlled Trial of Semaglutide Once Daily Versus Liraglutide and Placebo in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

    1926 Diabetes Care Volume 41, September 2018 Ildiko Lingvay,1 Cyrus V. Desouza,2 A 26-Week Randomized Katarina S. Lalic,3 Ludger Rose,4 Thomas Hansen,5 Jeppe Zacho,5 and Controlled Trial of Semaglutide Thomas R. Pieber6 EMERGING THERAPIES: DRUGS AND REGIMENS Once Daily Versus Liraglutide and Placebo in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Suboptimally Controlled on Diet and Exercise With or Without Metformin Diabetes Care 2018;41:1926–1937 | https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-2381 OBJECTIVE To investigate the efficacy and safety of once-daily semaglutide in comparison with once-daily liraglutide and placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This 26-week, multicenter, double-blind trial involved patients diagnosed with 1University of Texas Southwestern Medical Cen- type 2 diabetes with HbA1c 7.0–10.0% (53–86 mmol/mol) and treated with diet ter at Dallas, Dallas, TX and exercise with or without metformin. Patients were randomized 2:2:1 to once- 2University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, daily semaglutide, liraglutide, or placebo in one of four volume-matched doses NE 3Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, and (semaglutide 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, or 0.3 mg and liraglutide 0.3, 0.6, 1.2, or 1.8 mg, with Clinic for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic both compared within each volume-matched dose group). Primary end point was Diseases, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26. 4Institute for Diabetes Research in Munster,¨ RESULTS Munster,¨ Germany 5Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark In total, 705 randomized patients were exposed to trial products.
  • A Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Exenatide Once Weekly with Other GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

    A Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Exenatide Once Weekly with Other GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

    Diabetes Ther DOI 10.1007/s13300-016-0155-1 REVIEW A Network Meta-analysis Comparing Exenatide Once Weekly with Other GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Sheena Kayaniyil . Greta Lozano-Ortega . Heather A. Bennett . Kristina Johnsson . Alka Shaunik . Susan Grandy . Bernt Kartman To view enhanced content go to www.diabetestherapy-open.com Received: December 17, 2015 Ó The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com ABSTRACT treatment of adults with T2DM inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy. Introduction: Exenatide is a glucagon-like Methods: A systematic literature review was peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), conducted to identify randomized controlled approved for treatment of type 2 diabetes trials (RCTs) that investigated GLP-1 RAs mellitus (T2DM). There is limited direct (albiglutide, dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, evidence comparing the efficacy and and lixisenatide) at approved doses in the tolerability of exenatide 2 mg once weekly United States/Europe, added on to metformin (QW) to other GLP-1 RAs. A network only and of 24 ± 6 weeks treatment duration. meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to A Bayesian NMA was conducted. estimate the relative efficacy and tolerability of Results: Fourteen RCTs were included in the exenatide QW versus other GLP-1 RAs for the NMA. Exenatide QW obtained a statistically significant reduction in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) relative to lixisenatide 20 lg once daily. No other comparisons of exenatide QW Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-016-0155-1) to other GLP-1 RAs were statistically significant contains supplementary material, which is available to for change in HbA1c.
  • Subcutaneous Semaglutide, Dulaglutide and Liraglutide 1.2Mg for the Treatment of Type

    Subcutaneous Semaglutide, Dulaglutide and Liraglutide 1.2Mg for the Treatment of Type

    North Central London Joint Formulary Committee Factsheet Subcutaneous SEMAGLUTIDE▼ (Ozempic®), DULAGLUTIDE▼ (Trulicity®) and LIRAGLUTIDE 1.2mg (Victoza®) Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Start date: December 2019 Review date: August 2022 Document Control Date Version Action July 2016 1.0 New guideline August 2019 1.1 Subcutaneous semaglutide added as the preferred GLP-1 receptor agonist November 2019 1.2 Supply quantities added Agreed by NCL Shared Care Group: December 2019 FACTSHEET TO FACILITATE PRESCRIBING PLEASE NOTE THIS IS NOT A SHARED CARE GUIDELINE, NOR IS IT A FULL SUMMARY OF DRUG INFORMATION. ALWAYS REFER TO THE MOST RECENT BNF AND/OR SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS. Disclaimer This Fact Sheet is registered at North Central London (NCL) Joint Formulary Committee (JFC) and is intended solely for use by healthcare professionals to aid the treatment of patients within NCL. However, this fact sheet is for guidance only, its interpretation and application remains the responsibility of the individual clinician. If in doubt, contact a senior colleague or expert. Clinicians are advised to refer to the manufacturer’s current prescribing information before treating individual patients. The authors and NCL JFC accept no liability for use of this information from this beyond its intended use. While we have tried to compile accurate information in this document, and to keep it updated in a timely manner, we cannot guarantee that it is fully complete and correct at all times. If you identify information within this document that is inaccurate, please report this to the [email protected]. If a patient is harmed as a consequence of following this document, please complete a local incident report and inform [email protected].
  • Victoza® (Liraglutide) Injection LEADER: Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results

    Victoza® (Liraglutide) Injection LEADER: Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results

    Novo Nordisk Victoza® (liraglutide) NDA 22341 S-027 Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drug Advisory Committee, June 20, 2017 Victoza® (liraglutide) injection LEADER: Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results NDA 22341 S-027 Briefing Document Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drug Advisory Committee June 20, 2017 Advisory Committee Briefing Materials: Available for Public Release Novo Nordisk Victoza® (liraglutide) NDA 22341 S-027 Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drug Advisory Committee, June 20, 2017 2 of 95 1 Executive summary Introduction Liraglutide is an analog with 97% homology to human glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and acts as a GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA). Liraglutide (Victoza®) obtained marketing authorization in the United States (US) in 2010 and is currently approved in over 100 countries worldwide. In the US, Victoza® (for subcutaneous injection 1.2 mg and 1.8 mg once-daily) is indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as mono- or combination therapy.1 The exposure to Victoza® in the post-marketing setting is extensive; as of 30 June 2016, the cumulative exposure was estimated to be greater than 6 million patient-years of exposure to Victoza®. The LEADER trial (Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results) was a cardiovascular outcomes trial designed and conducted to determine the effect and long-term safety of liraglutide versus placebo on cardiovascular outcomes as
  • GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Reference Number: CP.HNMC.16 Effective Date: 11.16.16 Last Review Date: 11.17 Revision Log Line of Business: Medicaid – Medi-Cal

    GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Reference Number: CP.HNMC.16 Effective Date: 11.16.16 Last Review Date: 11.17 Revision Log Line of Business: Medicaid – Medi-Cal

    Clinical Policy: GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Reference Number: CP.HNMC.16 Effective Date: 11.16.16 Last Review Date: 11.17 Revision Log Line of Business: Medicaid – Medi-Cal See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information. Description The following are GLP-1 Receptor Agonists requiring prior authorization: lixisenatide (Adlyxin™), Exenatide Extended-Release (Bydureon®), Exenatide (Byetta®), Pramlintide Acetate (Symlin®), Albiglutide (Tanzeum®), Dulaglutide (Trulicity®), Liraglutide (Victoza®), Liraglutide and insulin degludec (Xultophy®),Insulin glargine and lixisenatide (Soliqua®). FDA approved indication Adlyxin, Bydureon, Byetta, Tanzeum, Trulicity, Victoza are indicated: As an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Adlyxin limitation of use: Has not been studied in patients with chronic pancreatitis or a history of unexplained pancreatitis. Consider other antidiabetic therapies in patients with a history of pancreatitis. Not for treatment of type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. Has not been studied in combination with short acting insulin. Has not been studied in patients with gastroparesis and is not recommended in patients with gastroparesis. Bydureon limitation of use: Not recommended as first-line therapy for patients inadequately controlled on diet and exercise. Should not be used to treat type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. Use with insulin has not been studied and is not recommended. Has not been studied in patients with a history of pancreatitis. Consider other antidiabetic therapies in patients with a history of pancreatitis. Byetta limitation of use: Not a substitute for insulin. Byetta should not be used for the treatment of type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis.
  • Efficacy and Safety of Taspoglutide Versus Sitagliptin

    Efficacy and Safety of Taspoglutide Versus Sitagliptin

    Diabetes Ther (2012) 3:13 DOI 10.1007/s13300-012-0013-8 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Efficacy and Safety of Taspoglutide Versus Sitagliptin for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T-Emerge 4 Trial) Richard M. Bergenstal • Adriana Forti • Jean-Louis Chiasson • Michael Woloschak • Mark Boldrin • Raffaella Balena To view enhanced content go to www.diabetestherapy-open.com Received: August 9, 2012 / Published online: November 9, 2012 Ó The Author(s) 2012. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com ABSTRACT sitagliptin or placebo, as adjunct to metformin, in patients with inadequately Introduction: The efficacy and safety of controlled type 2 diabetes. taspoglutide, a long-acting human glucagon- Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, like peptide-1 analog, were compared with double-dummy, parallel-group trial, patients were randomized to taspoglutide 10 mg once For the T-emerge 4 Study Group. weekly (QW), 20 mg QW, 100 mg sitagliptin Study investigators listed in the Appendix. once daily (QD), or placebo for 24 weeks, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00754988. followed by 28-week short-term and 104-week long-term extension periods. The primary R. M. Bergenstal (&) endpoint was change in glycosylated Park Nicollet International Diabetes Center, hemoglobin (HbA ) after 24 weeks. Minneapolis, MN 55416, USA 1c e-mail: [email protected] Results: In this study, 666 patients (baseline HbA , 7.96% [SD, 0.87]; fasting plasma glucose, A. Forti 1c Universidade Federal do Ceara´, Fortaleza, Brazil 9.61 mmol/L [2.56]; body weight, 92.4 kg [19.3]) were randomized to taspoglutide 10 mg J.-L. Chiasson Centre de Recherche, Centre Hospitalier de QW (n = 190), 20 mg QW (n = 198), l’Universite´ de Montre´al, Universite´ de Montre´al, 100 mg sitagliptin QD (n = 185), or placebo Montreal, QC H2Q 1T8, Canada (n = 93) for 24 weeks.
  • Study Protocol

    Study Protocol

    CLINICAL TRIAL REPORT ZP4207-17086 (ZEA-DNK-02170) 16.1 TRIAL INFORMATION 16.1.1 PROTOCOL AND PROTOCOL AMENDMENTS This appendix includes Document Date, Version Clinical trial protocol Version 1.0, 08 June 2018 (valid in Slovenia and the USA) Version 3.0, 08 January 2019 (valid in Germany) Section 16.1.1: Protocol and Protocol Amendments Clinical Trial Protocol, final version 1.0 ZP4207-17086 (ZEA-DNK-02170) Clinical Trial Protocol A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-arm trial to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of dasiglucagon relative to placebo and GlucaGen® when administered as a rescue therapy for severe hypoglycemia in children with T1DM treated with insulin Sponsor code: ZP4207-17086 Synteract: ZEA-DNK-02170 EudraCT number: 2018-000892-33 Coordinating investigator: Prof. Dr. med. Thomas Danne Allgemeine Kinderheilkunde Diabetologie, Endokrinologie, Klinische Forschung Diabeteszentrum für Kinder und Jugendliche AUF DER BULT Kinder- und Jugendkrankenhaus Janusz-Korczak-Allee 12 30173 Hannover Germany Sponsor: Zealand Pharma A/S Smedeland 36 2600 Glostrup, Copenhagen Denmark Version: final version 1.0 Date: 08 June 2018 GCP statement This trial will be performed in compliance with Good Clinical Practice, the Declaration of Helsinki (with amendments) and local legal and regulatory requirements. 08 June 2018 CONFIDENTIAL Page 1/55 Zealand Pharma A/S ClinicalTrial Prolocol, final ve¡sion 1.0 zP 42A7 -1 7 A 86 (ZEA-DN K-02 1 L Slgnature¡ and agreoment wlth protocot Tltle: phase A 3, ¡andomized, double-blind, placebo- and aclivg-controlled, parallel-arm trial to assess the efficac¡ safety, and pharmacoítinetics of dasiglucagon rela¡ve to placebo and GlucaGeno when edministered as a rescue thêrapy for sevãre triposivcemia ¡n children w¡th TlDM treated with insulin we, the undersigned, agroe to conduct lhls trlal according to lhe Trlal protocol.
  • Weekly Semaglutide Vs. Liraglutide Efficacy Profile: a Network Meta

    Weekly Semaglutide Vs. Liraglutide Efficacy Profile: a Network Meta

    healthcare Systematic Review Weekly Semaglutide vs. Liraglutide Efficacy Profile: A Network Meta-Analysis Hassan A. Alsugair 1,* , Ibrahim F. Alshugair 2 , Turki J. Alharbi 1,*, Abdulaziz M. Bin Rsheed 1 , Ayla M. Tourkmani 1 and Wedad Al-Madani 3 1 Family Medicine Department, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh 12624, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] (A.M.B.R.); [email protected] (A.M.T.) 2 Orthopedic Surgery Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh 12746, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] 3 General Authority of Statistics, Riyadh 11481, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] (H.A.A.); [email protected] or [email protected] (T.J.A.); Tel.: +966-114777714-40438 (T.J.A.) Abstract: Introduction: Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) is a class of hypo- glycemic medications. Semaglutide once-weekly (QW) and liraglutide once-daily (OD) significantly improved glycemic control compared to placebo. To date, no long-term phase III trials directly comparing semaglutide and liraglutide are available. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to compare the long-term efficacy of semaglutide and liraglutide. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception until June 2019 to identify relevant articles. Nine long-term randomized controlled trials comparing once-weekly semaglutide or liraglutide with placebo or other active comparisons were identified. The outcomes of interest were changes in HbA1c and weight after 52 weeks. A Bayesian framework and NMA were used for data synthesis. Citation: Alsugair, H.A.; This is a sub-study of the protocol registered in PROSPERO (number CRD42018091598).