DOCSLIB.ORG

The European Journal • July 1999

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The European Journal • July 1999 Volume 6 Number 8 July 1999 £2.50 The European Journal The Journal of the European Foundation Michael Gove Britain and Europe under Blair & Prof. Paul Ormerod, Michael Colvin, MP, Vàclav Klaus and Prof. Deepak Lal & The ‘New’ Deal: Tory MEPs and the EPP The European Foundation 61 Pall Mall, London SW1Y 5HZ Chairman: William Cash, MP JULY 1999 VOLUME 6 NUMBER 8 THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL The Journal of the European Foundation Contents For reference, numbers on pages are as in the printed copy Original PDF Articles below are hyperlinked – use the hand icon, point and click Page Page. Editorial 23 Bill Cash, MP A European Army? 34 Michael Colvin, MP Britain and Europe under Blair 56 Michael Gove A Currency for Jobs? 78 Professor Paul Ormerod Conservative MEPs and the European People’s Party: Time for Divorce 10 11 Jonathan Collett & Martin Ball Poll Data: Analysis of the European Elections 14 15 Tony L o dg e EMU and Globalisation 16 17 Professor Deepak Lal EMU: The Czech Perspective 19 20 Professor Vàclav Klaus Will Europe Work 20 21 by David Smith Reviewed by Charlie Methven Conservative MEPs and the European People’s Party: Time for Divorce 21 22 by Jonathan Collett & Martin Ball Reviewed by Allan Lloyd The UK and the Euro – Better out than in? 22 23 by Graeme Leach Reviewed by Russell Lewis Eurowatch 23 24 Lynette Swift The Rule of Law 24 25 David Radlett The Cologne Summit 26 27 Editor: Tony Lodge Publisher: The European Foundation, 61 Pall Mall, London SW1Y 5HZ Telephone: +44 (0) 20 7930 7319 Facsimile: +44 (0) 20 7930 9706 E-mail: [email protected] ISSN 1351–6620 For subscription and advertising enquiries, please contact the editorial office. A subscription form is printed on the inside back cover. The European Journal is published by The European Foundation. Views expressed in this publication are those of the authors themselves, not those of The European Journal or The European Foundation. Feature articles and letters should be sent to the Editor at the address above, if possible on 3.5" IBM compatible disks which will be returned to the authors. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means or stored in a retrieval system without the written permission of the publisher. Typesetting by Nelson & Pollard, Oxford The Next Steps – After the European Elections n my last Editorial I urged readers to vote The connection between the European issue and the IConservative in the European elections because the domestic agenda must be spelt out now. No political Conservatives had the most Euro-realist policies. The party has been prepared to do this for decades, neither Conservative Party scored a notable success for which on the constitutional nor on the economic front. William Hague deserves great credit, although In recent months I have repeatedly called on Tony personally I would have ruled out the single currency Blair in the House to explain the constitutional for good. connection in a White Paper, as readers know, but he However, as I also indicated, we now have to build has adamantly and publicly refused to do so. on this success. It was no accident that UKIP gained On the economic front we see from Anthony King’s three seats and 8% of the poll. Many who voted UKIP articles in the Daily Telegraph on 3rd July which accom- could well have voted Conservative had our message panied the Gallup poll that Labour supporters are now had more muscle: i.e., single market, yes, but never to turning against the euro, even as the Conservative Party the single currency. remains marooned at 27%. Traditional Labour voters The Daily Telegraph Gallup poll published on 3rd are becoming increasingly disenchanted, as we know July reinforces the case I have been urging for years. It from the local government, European and other recent asked, “If a referendum were held, how would you elections but have not shifted when it comes to vote?” 66% are against joining (and please note that questions related to a General Election. Much of this the question did not say “now”), which is 10% up on disenchantment, for example in relation to classroom the last six months. However, only 27% said that they sizes, hospital waiting lists and local government would vote Conservative in a General Election now. expenditure, comes from the constraints on public This paradox is at the very centre of gravity of expenditure caused by Gordon Brown’s shadowing of British politics and cannot remain unresolved, given the Maastricht criteria but which is unexplained by any the fact that the issue on both questions is about who political party. governs Britain and the very nature of our democracy. The Conservative Party could gain great electoral There is a rational explanation, which is that voters advantage if they explained this but they do not. If they do not see the connection between the European repudiated the Maastricht Treaty as they have the ERM, issue and the domestic agenda any more now than they could then reveal and exploit the connection and they did at the last General Election, which was return real choice to the voters but without opening the intimately bound up with the disaster they floodgates of unnecessary public expenditure. experienced with the ERM. This hit their confidence All of this requires a continuous open public debate in the Government’s domestic economic competence with fully explained information. The debate held by which was never explained as being connected with the Foundation on 15th July is an example of how this the European issue as such (although some of us should be done and is an object lesson to the media strenuously argued that it was), but the political (including particularly the BBC) by providing a live establishment with its propaganda machine would platform with cross examination between the not come clean. protagonists. A video of the debate is being produced. The situation remains the same but is now even Although the European Foundation does not more acute because, thanks to the Maastricht Treaty, remotely share his views, all credit to Lord (David) the weak euro with all its problems is now up and Simon for insisting on just such a public debate, as running, not to mention the collapse of the revealed in Sunday Business on 4th July. Greg Dyke, Commission and myriad other disastrous European Editor in Chief – take note! policies familiar to readers of the Journal. Bill Cash, July 1999 JUMP TO CONTENTS 2 The European Journal • July 1999 A European Army? by Michael Colvin, MP he Anglo–French St Malo Likely allies for Britain in rejecting it are The debate about whether European TDeclaration of December 1998 said in the European countries with neutral status forces are primarily for NATO operations or paragraph one that it will be important to – Ireland, Denmark, Austria, Sweden and for European operations is a false one. We achieve full and rapid implementation of Finland. know that by strengthening Europe’s the Amsterdam provisions on Common What our Secretary of State, Mr George military contributions, we can provide Foreign and Security Polity (CFSP). This Robertson, said to the WEU Assembly on effective underpinning for our foreign and means framing a common defence policy so 1st December was that the Europeans could security policy, which must remain based that the European Union can have the play a fuller role in contributing to our joint on a North Atlantic charter. capacity for autonomous action, backed up security but what, he asked, does this means Shortly after the Secretary of State for by credible military forces, the means to in practice. Defence made his speech, I was the only decide to use them and a readiness to do so, delegate present to vote against ‘TIME FOR in order to respond to international crises. DEFENCE: A PLAN FOR ACTION’ The Declaration reiterated member The debate about proposed by the Assembly of the WEU, to states’ commitment to the mutual security be considered later by the Council of obligation in Article 5 of the Washington whether European forces Ministers. The most common word Treaty and Article V of the Brussels Treaty, running through the document was but this was easier to do when NATO and are primarily for NATO ‘integration’. While the plan acknowledged the Western European Union (WEU) operations or for the weakness shown by European countries nations within it were restrictive to as a result of their governments’ having to defensive operations. European operations depend on the security guarantees provided The experiences of first Bosnia, and now by the United States through NATO, it did Kosovo, show how difficult it is to get agree- is a false one not point out that it would require a ment among member states when offensive reconsideration of the current policies action may be required vis-à-vis the advocated by the Finance Ministers of the deployment of ground forces in Kosovo. The Government’s aim is quite simple. It member states to increase their defence Perhaps more significantly, Alliance is to enable the European Union to have a budgets – just as has now recently happened disagreements over Operation Desert Fox more united and influential voice, in the United States of America. in Iraq earlier this year revealed the gap articulated with greater speed and At the Madrid Summit in 1997, NATO between a number of the European allies, coherence through the CFSP and backed leaders reaffirmed the concept of a Euro- on the one hand, and Britain and America up, when the need arises, with effective and pean Security and Defence Identity (ESDI) on the other.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download (515Kb)
    European Community No. 26/1984 July 10, 1984 Contact: Ella Krucoff (202) 862-9540 THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: 1984 ELECTION RESULTS :The newly elected European Parliament - the second to be chosen directly by European voters -- began its five-year term last month with an inaugural session in Strasbourg~ France. The Parliament elected Pierre Pflimlin, a French Christian Democrat, as its new president. Pflimlin, a parliamentarian since 1979, is a former Prime Minister of France and ex-mayor of Strasbourg. Be succeeds Pieter Dankert, a Dutch Socialist, who came in second in the presidential vote this time around. The new assembly quickly exercised one of its major powers -- final say over the European Community budget -- by blocking payment of a L983 budget rebate to the United Kingdom. The rebate had been approved by Community leaders as part of an overall plan to resolve the E.C.'s financial problems. The Parliament froze the rebate after the U.K. opposed a plan for covering a 1984 budget shortfall during a July Council of Ministers meeting. The issue will be discussed again in September by E.C. institutions. Garret FitzGerald, Prime Minister of Ireland, outlined for the Parliament the goals of Ireland's six-month presidency of the E.C. Council. Be urged the representatives to continue working for a more unified Europe in which "free movement of people and goods" is a reality, and he called for more "intensified common action" to fight unemployment. Be said European politicians must work to bolster the public's faith in the E.C., noting that budget problems and inter-governmental "wrangles" have overshadolted the Community's benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Theresa May - the Prime Minister
    Contents Theresa May - The Prime Minister .......................................................................................................... 5 Nancy Astor - The first female Member of Parliament to take her seat ................................................ 6 Anne Jenkin - Co-founder Women 2 Win ............................................................................................... 7 Margaret Thatcher – Britain’s first woman Prime Minister .................................................................... 8 Penny Mordaunt – First woman Minister of State for the Armed Forces at the Ministry of Defence ... 9 Lucy Baldwin - Midwifery and safer birth campaigner ......................................................................... 10 Hazel Byford – Conservative Women’s Organisation Chairman 1990 - 1993....................................... 11 Emmeline Pankhurst – Leader of the British Suffragette Movement .................................................. 12 Andrea Leadsom – Leader of House of Commons ................................................................................ 13 Florence Horsbrugh - First woman to move the Address in reply to the King's Speech ...................... 14 Helen Whately – Deputy Chairman of the Conservative Party ............................................................. 15 Gillian Shephard – Chairman of the Association of Conservative Peers ............................................... 16 Dorothy Brant – Suffragette who brought women into Conservative Associations ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Politics and the British Voter Chapter Five
    PERFORMANCE POLITICS AND THE BRITISH VOTER CHAPTER FIVE by Harold D. Clarke David Sanders Marianne C. Stewart Paul Whiteley Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, in press NOT FOR QUOTATION OR CITATION WITHOUT AUTHORS' EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION 2 CHAPTER FIVE ELECTORAL CHOICES Version: Production This chapter analyses party choice and turnout in Britain’s 2005 general election. As discussed in Chapters Three and Four, the context in which this contest was held was quite different than that of the preceding, 2001, general election. At that time, Labour had been in a very strong position. The economy was vibrant, a sizable plurality of voters identified themselves as Labour partisans, and the issue agenda was dominated by public services such as the National Health Service and education, issues that Labour traditionally had claimed as its own. Labour Leader, Tony Blair, not especially popular, was more warmly received than his principal competitor, Conservative Leader, William Hague. However, by 2005, public opinion had shifted, and judgments about the performance of Prime Minister Blair and his New Labour government had become considerably more negative. Although the electoral system remained biased in Labour's favour, and most opinion polls showed the party holding a modest lead over the Conservatives, the party's 2005 electoral prospects were clearly more uncertain than they been four years earlier. Labour would likely win more seats than its rivals, but a hung parliament was a real possibility. In this chapter, we employ BES data to document the mix of public beliefs, attitudes and opinions that governed electoral choice in 2005. We then examine the explanatory power of rival models of party choice to understand the forces that affected voting behavior in 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Spotlight on America
    DANIEL FINKELSTEIN LOUISE MENSCH celebrates the modern on what the Tories are conservatism of Martin doing wrong and Chris The Luther King Christie’s doing right Progressive Conscience Spotlight on America Bush adviser David Frum issues a warning for Cameron and tells Bright Blue his regrets “Iraq: it’s on my mind all the time. Every day.” senator olympia snowe | iain martin | jesse norman | stephen pollard J1025 The Progressive Conscience COVER.indd 1-2 23/09/2013 12:24 AMERICA BOOKS AND ARTS Contents Opening an American mind Brooks Newmark, the American-born MP and KATE MALTBY is the Editor of Contributors EditorialVice-President of the Harvard Alumni Association, The Progressive Conscience. NIGEL CAMERON is CEO of the tells British students to head to the Ivy League Center for Policy on Emerging Technologies Justin Timberlake brought sexy back. Sir Thomas Wyatt of The Progressive Conscience takes ‘America’ as its theme. I’m LUKE COFFEY is the Margaret brought sonnets back. As of the Labour Party conference, Ed particularly proud that Olympia Snowe has drawn on her long Thatcher Fellow at The Heritage course in Britain is generally broken This ultimately leads to a very P18 P29 P32 Foundation Miliband is ‘bringingBROOKS NEWMARK socialism has back’. served For the third time, per- career as a deal-brokering Republican Senator to write for us as a Government Whip, Lord down into three terms over a three year different undergraduate experience. OLIVER COOPER is the Chairman haps, it’s good news for Tories. on cross-party dialogue. Daniel Finkelstein, Stephen Pollard Commissioner HM Treasury, period – although Scottish courses tend I found the student bodies at both of Conservative Future But is he? George W Bush’s economic advisor, David Frum, and Iain Martin lend us their expertise on lessons from recent 03 Editorial 18 David Frum: After Bush and was a Member of the to involve a four year degree.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Summary of Findings from Report Commissioned by the Conservative
    Summary of Findings from Report Commissioned by the Conservative and Unionist Party from Clifford Chance into Allegations of Bullying, Harassment and Inappropriate Behaviour and into the Knowledge of and Response to those Allegations by Conservative Campaign Headquarters (CCHQ) The Party, on 8 December 2015, commissioned Clifford Chance LLP (CC) to conduct an independent investigation and report to the Conservative Party Board. This document sets out the findings of that report (the Report). CC's investigative process has been certified by Lord Pannick QC, who is satisfied that the process followed to produce the Report was fair, objective, appropriate and comprehensive. At the time the Report was commissioned, the Party committed to publishing the Report’s findings. The Party respects the rights of confidentiality and privacy of those involved in the events which the Report has considered and therefore the findings are presented in a manner that ensures that, so far as possible, no complainant or witness (other than senior CCHQ staff) can be identified. In order to achieve this, it is necessary not only to omit any such person’s name but also to avoid referencing any other details (such as dates, locations and details of alleged incidents) that might allow such person to be identified. This summary of the Report’s findings focuses on allegations that were reported or were alleged to have been reported to CCHQ. It does not include any instances of allegations of bullying, harassment and other inappropriate behaviour that are not alleged to have been reported to CCHQ and evidence relating to the circumstances leading up to Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 Election Candidates | European Parliament Information Office in the United Kin
    1999 Election Candidates | European Parliament Information Office in the United Kin ... Page 1 of 10 UK Office of the European Parliament Home > 1999 > 1999 Election Candidates Candidates The list of candidates was based on the information supplied by Regional Returning Officers at the close of nominations on 13 May 2004. Whilst every care was taken to ensure that this information is accurate, we cannot accept responsibility for any omissions or inaccuracies or for any consequences that may result. Voters in the UK's twelve EU constituencies will elect 78 MEPs. The distribution of seats is as follows: Eastern: 7 East Midlands: 6 London: 9 North East: 3 North West: 9 South East: 10 South West: 7 West Midlands: 7 Yorkshire and the Humber: 6 Scotland: 7 Wales: 4 Northern Ireland: 3 Eastern LABOUR CONSERVATIVE 1. Eryl McNally, MEP 1. Robert Sturdy, MEP 2. Richard Howitt, MEP 2. Christopher Beazley 3. Clive Needle, MEP 3. Bashir Khanbhai 4. Peter Truscott, MEP 4. Geoffrey Van Orden 5. David Thomas, MEP 5. Robert Gordon 6. Virginia Bucknor 6. Kay Twitchen 7. Beth Kelly 7. Sir Graham Bright 8. Ruth Bagnall 8. Charles Rose LIBERAL DEMOCRAT GREEN 1. Andrew Duff 1. Margaret Elizabeth Wright 2. Rosalind Scott 2. Marc Scheimann 3. Robert Browne 3. Eleanor Jessy Burgess 4. Lorna Spenceley 4. Malcolm Powell 5. Chris White 5. James Abbott 6. Charlotte Cane 6. Jennifer Berry 7. Paul Burall 7. Angela Joan Thomson 8. Rosalind Gill 8. Adrian Holmes UK INDEPENDENCE PRO EURO CONSERVATIVE PARTY 1. Jeffrey Titford 1. Paul Howell 2. Bryan Smalley 2.
    [Show full text]
  • John Curtice, Stephen Fisher, Robert Ford and Patrick English
    APPENDIX 1: THE RESULtS ANaLYSED John Curtice, Stephen Fisher, Robert Ford and Patrick English The outcome of the 2017 election seems to pose a serious challenge to claims about the decline of Britain’s two-party system. No less than 84.5% of the UK-wide vote was cast for either the Conservatives or Labour, well above the proportion at any election since 1970. At 2.88, the effective number of parties in the electorate (as conventionally calculated) is still somewhat above two, but is now well down on the figure of 3.71 that pertained as recently as 2010.1 But the term ‘two-party system’, is often used to imply more than two parties dominating the vote. Amongst other things, it is also taken to refer to a system in which power and ministerial office alternate between the Conservatives and Labour, one of whom, thanks to the electoral system, always enjoys an overall majority in the House of Commons. But in 2017 no single party secured an overall major- ity, and the election resulted in a minority Conservative government backed by a ‘confidence and supply’ arrangement with the DUP. This fol- lows an election in 2010 which also resulted in a hung parliament (and the formation of the country’s first post-war coalition) and another in 2015 that gave the Conservatives a majority of just 12, a majority that in precipi- tating the early 2017 ballot Theresa May indicated was too small. There is another reason to question whether the outcome of the 2017 election necessarily represented a return to some kind of ‘normality’.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Divisions in the European Parliament
    THE AUTHORS Gawain Towler was Conservative candidate in Glasgow Maryhill in the 2001 General Election. He has worked in the European Parliament for two years, and is the Commonwealth Editor of the World Parliamentarian Magazine. He is a member of the Bow Group and a former Vice-Chairman of the Conservative Graduates. Emmanuel Bordez is a staff member for the French unattached MEPs. After graduating in Political Science (Université de Bordeaux), he worked in local government in France in a senior advisory capacity. He has advised French eurosceptic MEPs (including P. de Villiers of Mouvement pour la France) since 1994. This paper represents his personal view. Dr Lee Rotherham was Conservative Candidate in St Helens South in the 2001 General Election. He is Secretary of Conservatives Against a Federal Europe, and has been Special Adviser on European Affairs to three successive Shadow Foreign Secretaries. The aim of the Centre for Policy Studies is to develop and promote policies that provide freedom and encouragement for individuals to pursue the aspirations they have for themselves and their families, within the security and obligations of a stable and law-abiding nation. The views expressed in our publications are, however, the sole responsibility of the authors. Contributions are chosen for their value in informing public debate and should not be taken as representing a corporate view of the CPS or of its Directors. The CPS values its independence and does not carry on activities with the intention of affecting public support for any registered political party or for candidates at election, or to influence voters in a referendum.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Southampton in Hampshire
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Southampton in Hampshire Report to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions July 2000 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND This report sets out the Commission’s final recommendations on the electoral arrangements for the city of Southampton in Hampshire. Members of the Commission are: Professor Malcolm Grant (Chairman) Professor Michael Clarke CBE (Deputy Chairman) Peter Brokenshire Kru Desai Pamela Gordon Robin Gray Robert Hughes CBE Barbara Stephens (Chief Executive) © Crown Copyright 2000 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no: 165 ii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page LETTER TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE v SUMMARY vii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 5 3 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 9 4 RESPONSES TO CONSULTATION 11 5 ANALYSIS AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 13 6 NEXT STEPS 29 APPENDIX A Draft Recommendations for Southampton (January 2000) 31 A large map illustrating the proposed ward boundaries for Southampton is inserted inside the back cover of this report. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND iii iv LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Local Government Commission for England 25 July 2000 Dear Secretary of State On 20 July 1999 the Commission began a periodic electoral review of Southampton under the Local Government Act 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Roads Lead Away from Rome
    All Roads Lead Away From Rome A Liberal Theory of International Regimes by Mareike Kleine Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades des Dr. phil. / Ph.D. eingereicht im September 2009 am Otto-Suhr-Institut für Politikwissenschaft Fachbereich für Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften Freie Universität Berlin Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Thomas Risse Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Andrew Moravcsik Mentor im Rahmen der BTS: Prof. Dr. Robert O. Keohane Acknowledgement This dissertation would not have been possible without the extraordinary support of my three advisors: Thomas Risse, Andy Moravcsik, and Bob Keohane. I am especially grateful to Andy for his continuous encouragement and, most of all, for his friendship. Ich widme die Dissertation dem Angedenken meiner lieben Eltern. Princeton, September 2009 2 Table of Contents Graphs, Figures and Tables 4 Abbreviations 6 Theory Chapter 1 – Introduction 9 Chapter 2 – Liberal Regime Theory 23 Part I – The Informal Norm of Discretion in EC Decision-Making 1958-2001 Chapter 3 – Formal and Informal Practices 54 Chapter 4 – Agenda Setting 75 Chapter 5 – Voting 115 Chapter 6 – Implementation 158 Part II – Auxiliary Institutions in EC Decision-Making Chapter 7 – Moral Hazard and Auxiliary Institutions 185 Chapter 8 – The Evolution of the Council Presidency 200 Chapter 9 – The Presidency Bias 214 Chapter 10 – The Presidency as an Adjudicator 230 Conclusion Chapter 11 – Conclusion and Extension 265 Appendix Primary Sources 279 Bibliography 281 Curriculum Vitae 304 3 Graphs, Figures and Tables Graphs Graph 1: Commission’s reliance on governmental expertise 1963-1969………………………...… 90 Graph 2: Council legal acts 1958-2001…………………………………………………………...... 116 Graph 3: Consensus decision-making in the Council 1994-2001…………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Becoming a Conservative Councillor
    A GUIDE TO BECOMING A CONSERVATIVE COUNCILLOR A guide to becoming a Conservative councillor CONTENTS Foreword 4 A note from the CCA Chairman 5 The role of a councillor: Introduction 6 Decision-making 6 Representation 7 Staying in touch 8 Helping your constituents 9 Eligibility 9 What do councils do? 10 10 top tips for new councillors 10 Getting elected 1 What to expect once you have been elected: 14 The term of office 14 The Code of Conduct 14 Training 14 Support 15 The time commitment 15 The financial cost 16 Your role within the Conservative Party 17 Conclusion 17 Councillor profiles 18 Becoming a Parish councillor: Introduction 21 Getting elected 21 What do Parish councils do? 22 Eligibility 22 Your role as a Parish councillor 2 What to expect once you have been elected 2 Conclusion 24 Parish councillor profile 24 About the Conservative Councillors’ Association 25 Useful information 26 Useful websites 27 8th Edition. October 2009. All information within this booklet is correct at the time of going to print A guide to becoming a Conservative councillor FOREWORD Now is a really exciting time to be a Conservative councillor. As an elected representative for your community you can make a real difference, and up and down the country Conservative councillors are already doing that. Independent research shows that Conservative run councils deliver the cleanest streets, the highest recycling and composting rates and the best ‘quality of life’ ratings. As a Party we recognise and value the role of elected councillors, which is why we want to give local government more powers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of the Black Vote in 2015
    POWER OF THE BLACK VOTE IN 2015 The Changing Face of England & Wales Parliamentary seats and their voters Sponsored by Table of Contents 3 Foreword - Simon Woolley 4-5 Executive Summary 6-7 List of Marginal Seats Measured by BME Impact 8 Voting and turnout 9 Methodology 10 BME Population 11 Individual BME Communities 12 Labour’s Challenge 13 Conservative’s Opportunity 14 Lib Dem’s Watershed 15 MP’s Vulnerable to BME Vote 16-63 Analysis of Parliamentary Seats © Operation Black Vote - August 2013 Researched, written and designed by Lester Holloway 2Assistance from Louise Alexander Changing Face of Britain Foreword lack and minority ethnic unemployment, education, Bvoters have been handed health and housing. the greatest opportunity ever What is also interesting about to effectively engage in British this data is the shift of where politics. BME political power has been. In Our groundbreaking research the past it was almost exclusively clearly shows that the BME vote in urban, inner city areas which could easily decide over 160 seats. barely changed political hands. The Coalition Government has Today this change is not only oc- governed the UK with a working curring in urban areas such as majority of just 83 seats. The data Croydon, Harrow and Ealing but that we are publishing therefore also outside urban areas, such speaks volumes; In a 168 marginal as Corby, Rossendale & Darwin, seats the BME electorate is larger Cheadle and Loughborough. than the majority in which the With this report we relish the seat was won. The BME electorate challenge to inspire an often cyni- could influence an even greater cal electorate to engage as never number of seats if, as predicted, before, and simultaneously to the election contest becomes ever inform our political leaders that tighter.
    [Show full text]