DOCSLIB.ORG

CONSTITUTION of the CONSERVATIVE PARTY ETHICS, CONDUCT and STANDARDS Schedule 10 P.72 PART XIIII P.17 COMMENCEMENT PROVISIONS CHANGES to the CONSTITUTION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CONSTITUTION of the CONSERVATIVE PARTY ETHICS, CONDUCT and STANDARDS Schedule 10 P.72 PART XIIII P.17 COMMENCEMENT PROVISIONS CHANGES to the CONSTITUTION !!! "#$%&'&(&'#$!"#$%&'&(&'#$!!!!! #)!&*+!#)!&*+!!!!! "#$%+,-.&'-+!/.,&0 First published February 1998 Amended October 1999 Amended July 2002 Amended July 2004 Amended April 2009 Including Schedules 7 and 7A (The Rules of Conservative Party Constituency Associations and Federations) ! 123433! Printed by Conservative Party, 30 Millbank, Westminster. SW1P 4DP Promoted by Alan Mabbutt on behalf of the Conservative Party both at 30 Millbank, Westminster. SW1P 4DP www.Conservatives.com 1 2 INDEX PART I p.5 SCHEDULES NAME, PURPOSE, OBJECTS AND VALUES Schedule 1 p.18 PART II P.5 INTERPRETATION MEMBERSHIP Schedule 2 p.19 PART III p.6 RULES FOR THE ELECTION OF THE LEADER LEADERSHIP Schedule 3 p.20 PART IV p.6 THE NATIONAL CONSERVATIVE THE BOARD OF THE CONSERVATIVE CONVENTION PARTY Schedule 4 p.22 PART V p.8 PARTY CONFERENCES THE NATIONAL CONSERVATIVE CONVENTION Schedule 5 p.24 PART VI p.9 AREA COUNCILS, AREA MANAGEMENT AREA COUNCILS, AREA MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVES AND REGIONAL CO- EXECUTIVES AND REGIONAL CO- ORDINATORS ORDINATORS Schedule 6 p.26 PART VII p.10 FURTHER RULES OF THE PARTY CONSTITUENCY ASSOCIATIONS Schedule 7 p.29 PART VIII p.13 RULES OF THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY THE CONSERVATIVE POLICY FORUM CONSTITUENCY ASSOCIATIONS PART IX p.14 Schedule 7A p.47 RECOGNISED ORGANISATIONS RULES OF THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY FEDERATIONS PART X p.15 PARTY CONFERENCES Schedule 8 p.69 THE SCOTTISH CONSERVATIVE & UNIONIST PART XI p.15 PARTY AND THE WELSH CONSERVATIVE PARTY FURTHER RULES OF THE PARTY Schedule 9 p.71 PART XII p.15 CHANGES TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY ETHICS, CONDUCT AND STANDARDS Schedule 10 p.72 PART XIIII p.17 COMMENCEMENT PROVISIONS CHANGES TO THE CONSTITUTION PART XIV p.17 COMMENCEMENT PROVISIONS PART XV p.17 INTERPRETATION 3 4 CONSTITUTION OF THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY PART I NAME, PURPOSE, OBJECTS AND VALUES 1 This is the Constitution of a political party which shall be known as “The Conservative and Unionist Party” (referred to in this Constitution as “the Party”). 2 Its purpose is to sustain and promote within the Nation the objects and values of the Conservative Party. PART II MEMBERSHIP 3 The Party is a political Party for the Nation, open to all who share its objects and values and who undertake to be bound by this Constitution. The Party shall consist of its Members. Membership of the Conservative Party is not compatible with Membership of or association with any other registered political party. 4 Its Members shall comprise: 4.1 Individuals (referred to in this Constitution as “Party Members”); 4.2 Constituency Associations, whose members shall only comprise Party Members; 4.3 Recognised Organisations, whose members shall only comprise Party Members, (other than expressly provided by the Board) being other organisations recognised by the Board. 4.4 The Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party, and its members (referred to in this Constitution as “Scottish Party Members”) subject to the provisions of Schedule 8. 5 Party Members, Constituency Associations, Recognised Organisations and (to the extent provided by Article 77 and Schedule 8 herein) The Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party and Scottish Party Members 5.1 shall each agree in the manner prescribed by the Board to be bound by this Constitution; and 5.2 shall work to sustain and promote the objects and values of the Party; and 5.3 shall pay such subscriptions (in the case of individuals) or affiliation fees (in the case of other Members) as shall be determined from time to time by the Board having regard to the recommendations of the Committee on Membership. 6 Subscriptions from individuals shall be received either by the Party or a Constituency Association. Subscriptions shall be received in relation to both the Party subscription and the Constituency Association subscription in the proportionate amounts (and shall belong to the Party and the Constituency Associations in such amounts) as determined from time to time by the Board in consultation with the Committee on Membership. 7 The payment by individuals to the Party or a Constituency Association of subscriptions shall, subject to Article 17.7 confer the following entitlements: 7.1 in relation to the Party, to be a Party Member; and 7.2 in relation to the Constituency Association which has received his subscription, (either directly or indirectly) to be a member of that Constituency Association. 8 A Party Member may apply to be a member of a Constituency Association notwithstanding that he is already a member of another Constituency Association provided that 8.1 a Constituency Association shall be obliged to account to the Party for the Party’s proportion of any subscription received by it from any Party Member who is a member of more than one Constituency Association; 8.2 a Party Member who is a member of more than one Constituency Association shall not be entitled to more than one vote in any election within the Party. 9 The names of Members shall be entered on the Party’s National Membership List which shall be kept, administered and up-dated from day to day by the Committee on Membership of the Board. Inclusion in the National Membership List shall be conclusive as to the membership of the Party. 5 PART III LEADERSHIP 10 There shall be a Leader of the Party (referred to in this Constitution as “the Leader”) drawn from those elected to Parliament, who shall be elected by the Party Members and Scottish Party Members in accordance with the provisions of Schedule 2. 11 The Leader shall determine the political direction of the Party having regard to the views of Party Members and the Conservative Policy Forum. PART IV THE BOARD OF THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY 12 There shall be established and maintained a Board of the Conservative Party (referred to in this constitution as “the Board”) which shall be the supreme decision-making body in matters of Party organisation and management. The Board shall consist of 12.1 The Chairman of the Conservative Party (“the Chairman of the Board”) who shall be appointed by the Leader and who will chair the Board in the absence of the Leader and act as the Leader’s representative on it; 12.2 Two Deputy Chairmen, 12.2.1 One of whom shall be Chairman of the National Conservative Convention and who, in the absence of the Chairman of the Board and the Leader, shall chair the Board; and 12.2.2 One of whom shall be appointed by the Leader; 12.3 Four further members elected by the National Conservative Convention (in addition to the Chairman of the National Conservative Convention), in accordance with the provisions contained within Schedule 3; 12.4 The elected Chairman of the 1922 Committee; 12.5 The Chairman of the Association of Conservative Peers; 12.6 The elected Deputy Chairman of the Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party; 12.7 The elected Chairman of the Welsh Conservative Party; 12.8 The elected Chairman of the Conservative Councillors Association; 12.9 The Treasurer of the Party, who shall be appointed by the Leader; 12.10 Up to one further member who may, from time to time, be nominated by the Leader subject to endorsement by the Board; 12.11 A senior member of the professional staff of the Party, who shall be nominated to serve on the Board by the Chairman of the Board. 12.12 The Board may make one further appointment to its number, subject to the approval of the Leader. 12.13 Three Members of Parliament to be elected by the Members of the Parliamentary Party under rules determined by the Executive Committee of the 1922 Committee after Consultation with the Board. 13 The Board shall meet not less than six times each year. The Leader shall be invited to attend all meetings of the Board. 14 The quorum for any meeting of the Board will be eight. 15 The Board shall appoint a Secretary to the Board who shall support the Board in its proper and efficient administration and shall be Secretary of the National Convention. 16 The Board shall agree rules concerning the notice to be given in respect of ordinary and emergency meetings of it, and rules governing the circulation in advance of briefing and other papers. 17 The Board shall have power to do anything which in its opinion relates to the management and administration of the Party. It shall oversee all activities within the Party and in particular be responsible for – 17.1 the development and implementation of the strategies for the Party, for its campaigning, organisation, membership, and fund-raising at a National, European and local level; 6 PART IV - THE BOARD OF THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY (cont.) 17.2 the review and approval of the Party’s annual budgets, the monitoring of financial performance and the production and publication of annual accounts; 17.3 the appointment of senior staff within the Party; 17.4 the administration of the National Membership List in accordance with the provisions of Article 19.1 and Schedule 6; 17.5 the maintenance of the Approved Lists of Candidates in accordance with the provisions of Article 19.2 and Schedule 6; 17.6 the oversight of the management and administration of Constituency Associations, including the power to recognise Federations or other groupings of Constituency Associations; 17.7 the cancellation or refusal of membership, in its absolute discretion, of any Party Member or prospective Party Member; 17.8 the replacement or removal from office of any Officer of a Constituency Association or Recognised Organisation in accordance with the provisions of Schedule 6; 17.9 the establishment of a new or replacement Constituency Association in accordance with the provisions of Schedule
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Haessly, Katie (2010) British Conservative Women Mps
    British Conservative Women MPs and ‘Women’s Issues’ 1950-1979 Katie Haessly, BA MA Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2010 1 Abstract In the period 1950-1979, there were significant changes in legislation relating to women’s issues, specifically employment, marital and guardianship and abortion rights. This thesis explores the impact of Conservative female MPs on these changes as well as the changing roles of women within the party. In addition there is a discussion of the relationships between Conservative women and their colleagues which provides insights into the changes in gender roles which were occurring at this time. Following the introduction the next four chapters focus on the women themselves and the changes in the above mentioned women’s issues during the mid-twentieth century and the impact Conservative women MPs had on them. The changing Conservative attitudes are considered in the context of the wider changes in women’s roles in society in the period. Chapter six explores the relationship between women and men of the Conservative Parliamentary Party, as well as men’s impact on the selected women’s issues. These relationships were crucial to enhancing women’s roles within the party, as it is widely recognised that women would not have been able to attain high positions or affect the issues as they did without help from male colleagues. Finally, the female Labour MPs in the alteration of women’s issues is discussed in Chapter seven. Labour women’s relationships both with their party and with Conservative women are also examined.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011-2012, Vol. 27
    2011-2012 NORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY PERSPECTIVES IN HISTORY VOLUME XXVII, 2011-2012 PERSPECTIVES IN HISTORY VOLUME Perspectives in History VOL. XXVII, 2011-2012 PHI ALPHA THETA ALPHA BETA PHI CHAPTER XXVIIPHI ALPHA THETA JOURNAL OF ALPHA BETA PHI CHAPTER OF PHI ALPHA THETA Officers Perspectives in Alpha Beta Phi Chapter History 2011-2012 James Lupo .................................President Ex-officio EDITOR Alexandra Barrett ......................President Kevin J. Leibach Caitlin Stylinski Hazelip ...........Vice President ASSISTANT EDITORS Matthew Chalfant ......................Treasurer Aaron Sprinkles Vincent Fraley ............................Historian Sheryn Labate Shane Winslow ..........................Secretary FACULTY ADVISOR Kevin Leibach .............................Journal Editor William Landon Kari Becker .................................Wellness Officer Perspectives in History is an annual scholarly publication of the Depart- ment of History and Geography at Northern Kentucky Unviersity (NKU). Opinions expressed by contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of the NKU Board of Regents, the faculty of the university, or of the student editors of the journal. Manuscripts are welcome from students and faculty in the Commonwealth of Kentucky. Send all articles, essays, and reviews to: Northern Kentucky University History/Geography Department Highland Heights, KY 41099 This publication was prepared by Northern Kentucky University and printed with state funds (KRS 57.375). Northern Kentucky University is committed to building a diverse faculty and staff for employment and promotion to ensure the highest quality of workforce and to foster an environment that embraces the broad range of human diversity. The university is committed to equal employment opportunity, affirmative action, and eliminating discrimination. This commitment is consistent with an intellectual community that celebrates individual differences and diversity as well as being a matter of law.
    [Show full text]
  • Going, Going, Gone: How Safe Is David Cameron?
    Going, Going, Gone: How Safe is David Cameron? democraticaudit.com /2016/06/03/going-going-gone-how-safe-is-david-cameron/ By Democratic Audit UK 2016-6-3 Last weekend, rumors were once again abound of plots to remove David Cameron as leader. Ben Worthy assesses the Prime Minister’s position in light of the latest threat, and writes that although it appears probable he will survive attempts to topple him in the short-term, the plots, rumours and rebellion will continue. David Cameron at first Cabinet meeting in 2010. Credit: Crown Copyright The UK’s EU referendum has turned into a series of threats against Cameron himself. The weekend was dominated by swirling rumours about Conservative MPs plotting to remove their leader with talk of plots of 50 MPs, (metaphorical) ‘stabbing in the front’ and letters to the 1922 committee. This isn’t the first time Cameron has faced challenges to his position. So how safe is he now? The rules for triggering an election for a Conservative party leader are clear. To ‘secure a confidence vote, 15% of Conservative Members of Parliament (“in receipt of the Conservative Whip”) must submit a request for such a vote, in writing, to the Chairman of the 1922 Committee’. This means 50 MPs need to sign a letter. There are 330 Conservative whipped MPs in the House of Commons. It is estimated that around 110 are definitely Brexit versus 128 MPs for Remain with the rest unknown. There are likely enough unhappy MPs to get 50 signatures on a letter. How these numbers may translate into a leadership election is less clear.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicaragua | Freedom House
    Nicaragua | Freedom House http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2012/nicaragua About Us DONATE Blog Contact Us REGIONS ISSUES Reports Programs Initiatives News Experts Events Donate FREEDOM IN THE WORLD Nicaragua Nicaragua Freedom in the World 2012 OVERVIEW: 2012 In November 2011, President Daniel Ortega was re-elected by an SCORES overwhelming margin and his party, the Sandanista National Liberation Front, won a two-thirds majority in the National Assembly. There were STATUS concerns about the legality of Ortega’s candidacy, as well as transparency issues and other irregularities during the election. Partly Although international observers found no evidence of widespread fraud, serious concerns remained about the politicization of institutions and the Free rule of law. FREEDOM RATING The independent Republic of Nicaragua was established in 1838, 17 years 4.5 after the end of Spanish rule. Its subsequent history has been marked by CIVIL LIBERTIES internal strife and dictatorship. The Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN), a leftist rebel group, overthrew the authoritarian regime of the Somoza 4 family in 1979. The FSLN then moved to establish a left-wing government, leading to a civil war. The United States intervened, in part by supporting POLITICAL RIGHTS irregular rebel forces known as the contras. In 1990, National Opposition Union presidential candidate Violeta Chamorro 5 defeated the FSLN’s Daniel Ortega in free and open elections, leading to a peaceful transfer of power. Before leaving office, however, the Sandinistas revised laws and sold off state property to party leaders, ensuring that they would retain political and economic clout. Former Managua mayor Arnoldo Alemán of the Liberal Constitutionalist Party (PLC) defeated Ortega in the 1996 presidential election, but he was accused of corruption throughout his ensuing presidency.
    [Show full text]
  • 30/Spring 2001
    Peelites Tony Little examines the part played by the renegade Conservatives – the Peelites – in the creation of the Liberal Party. ‘‘HisHis FriendsFriends SatSat onon thethe BenchesBenches Opposite’Opposite’ In the Journal’s special issue on defectors (Journal of Although Lord Palmerston had been a part of the Liberal Democrat History , winter –), one Aberdeen coalition, his semi-detached position and group significant to the development of the modern pugnacious character made him the inevitable war Liberal Party was omitted – the Peelites. Here, by leader and he was the prime beneficiary of the pe- way of a review of Professor Angus Hawkins’ book, tering out of the war shortly after he had acceded to Parliament, Party and the Art of Politics in Britain, – the premiership. However, Palmerston had only (Macmillan, ), I aim to show the part played been able to form his government by treading on by these renegade Conservatives in the creation of the toes of oversensitive Peelites such as Gladstone, the modern Liberal Party. and without resolving a long-running quarrel with The formation of the Liberal Party is often dated Lord John Russell. to the meeting in Willis’s Rooms on June . It is at this point that Hawkins takes up the story. This meeting brought together Whigs, Liberals, The problem he poses is that, while, in Kitson’s Radicals and Peelites to defeat Lord Derby. It ush- words, it is not ‘very easy to say what specific opin- ered in a Liberal government under Lord ions were uniquely organised in the middle of the Palmerston which served until Palmerston’s death in century by the Conservative Party’, the forces that and paved the way for Gladstone’s great re- came together to oppose Derby suffered from a su- forming government of –.
    [Show full text]
  • 301-United Kingdom: the Conservative Party *Note: All Code Justifications Which Appear in ALL CAPS Were Part of the Original ICPP Project (Janda, 1980)
    #301-United Kingdom: The Conservative Party *Note: All code justifications which appear in ALL CAPS were part of the original ICPP project (Janda, 1980). All other code justifications were subsequently provided by those credited after said justification. Variable 9.01: Nationalization of Structure 1950-1990: 5 CONSERVATIVE PARTY WAS ORGANIZED INTO TWELVE AREA COUNCILS IN ENGLAND AND WALES AND TWO DIVISIONS IN SCOTLAND. AREA COUNCILS MET FROM TWO TO FOUR TIMES YEARLY, WHILE AREA EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES FUNCTIONED IN THE INTERIM. AN AGENT OF THE CENTRAL OFFICE REPRESENTED THE INTERESTS OF THE NATIONAL PARTY, ACTING AS HONORARY SECRETARY FOR THE AREA COUNCIL. THESE REGIONAL ORGANIZATIONS IN THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY, WHICH HAD NO RESTRICTIONS ON THE TOPICS THEY COULD DISCUSS, EXERCISED SOMEWHAT MORE INDEPENDENCE OF ACTION THAN THEIR COUNTERPARTS IN THE LABOUR PARTY. (JANDA, 1980: 209) Norton notes that, "In terms of its internal organization, the party is hierarchical." (Norton, 1991:136) The hierarchy runs from the national organs through eleven regional offices in England, one in Wales and two in Scotland. Concerning the hierarchy and flow of authority, Kelly notes that even at the Conservative Local Government Conference and Exhibition, matters were arranged and managed at the national level. (Kelly,1989:58-9) [By Paul Sum] The Conservative Party in its 1974 Manifesto (Craig, 1975: 446), agreed the following: "In Scotland, we will: set up a Scottish Assembly; give the Secretary of State for Scotland, acting with the Scottish assembly, the power to decide how to spend Scotland's share of the U.K. budget; establish a Scottish development fund to provide substantial help with both the new problems created by oil, and with Scotland's old deprived areas; transfer the Oil Division of the Department of Energy to Scotland." [By Renata Chopra] As described in the Conservative Party publication The Right Approach (1976), Scotland feels that the Parliament and the government are out of touch with its needs.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Choose a Political Party
    FastFACTS How to Choose a Political Party When you sign up to vote, you can join a political party. A political party is a group of people who share the same ideas about how the government should be run and what it should do. They work together to win elections. You can also choose not to join any of the political parties and still be a voter. There is no cost to join a party. How to choose a political party: • Choose a political party that has the same general views you do. For example, some political parties think that government should No Party Preference do more for people. Others feel that government should make it If you do not want to register easier for people to do things for themselves. with a political party (you • If you do not want to join a political party, mark that box on your want to be “independent” voter registration form. This is called “no party preference.” Know of any political party), mark that if you do, you may have limited choices for party candidates in “I do not want to register Presidential primary elections. with a political party” on the registration form. In • You can change your political party registration at any time. Just fill California, you can still out a new voter registration form and check a different party box. vote for any candidate in The deadline to change your party is 15 days before the election. a primary election, except If you are not registered with a political party and for Presidential candidates.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Rule-Of-Law.Pdf
    RULE OF LAW Analyze how landmark Supreme Court decisions maintain the rule of law and protect minorities. About These Resources Rule of law overview Opening questions Discussion questions Case Summaries Express Unpopular Views: Snyder v. Phelps (military funeral protests) Johnson v. Texas (flag burning) Participate in the Judicial Process: Batson v. Kentucky (race and jury selection) J.E.B. v. Alabama (gender and jury selection) Exercise Religious Practices: Church of the Lukumi-Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah (controversial religious practices) Wisconsin v. Yoder (compulsory education law and exercise of religion) Access to Education: Plyer v. Doe (immigrant children) Brown v. Board of Education (separate is not equal) Cooper v. Aaron (implementing desegregation) How to Use These Resources In Advance 1. Teachers/lawyers and students read the case summaries and questions. 2. Participants prepare presentations of the facts and summaries for selected cases in the classroom or courtroom. Examples of presentation methods include lectures, oral arguments, or debates. In the Classroom or Courtroom Teachers/lawyers, and/or judges facilitate the following activities: 1. Presentation: rule of law overview 2. Interactive warm-up: opening discussion 3. Teams of students present: case summaries and discussion questions 4. Wrap-up: questions for understanding Program Times: 50-minute class period; 90-minute courtroom program. Timing depends on the number of cases selected. Presentations maybe made by any combination of teachers, lawyers, and/or students and student teams, followed by the discussion questions included in the wrap-up. Preparation Times: Teachers/Lawyers/Judges: 30 minutes reading Students: 60-90 minutes reading and preparing presentations, depending on the number of cases and the method of presentation selected.
    [Show full text]
  • Disraeli and Gladstone: Opposing Forces by Robert Blake
    Disraeli and Gladstone: Opposing Forces By Robert Blake Disraeli and Gladstone were both politicians of extraordinary ability - but their personalities clashed and they heartily loathed each other. Robert Blake, the British constitutional historian, compares their political careers, and charts their stormy relationship. Mutual dislike In the general election of 1 April 1880, the Conservative party under Benjamin Disraeli was crushingly defeated by the Liberals (known as Whigs) - under William Gladstone. Lord Granville, a moderate Whig, wrote to Queen Victoria who would, he knew, be bitterly disappointed by the decision of the electorate: 'Lord Beaconsfield [Disraeli] and Mr Gladstone are men of extraordinary ability; they dislike each other more than is usual among public men. Of no other politician Lord Beaconsfield would have said in public that his conduct was worse than those who had committed the Bulgarian atrocities. He has the power of saying in two words that which drives a person of Mr Gladstone's peculiar temperament into a state of great excitement.' There is no doubt that the two statesmen hated each other. There is no doubt that the two statesmen hated each other. Disraeli referred to his rival in a letter to Lord Derby as '...that unprincipled maniac Gladstone - extraordinary mixture of envy, vindictiveness, hypocrisy and superstition'. And Gladstone more moderately said of his old enemy, 'the Tory party had principles by which it would and did stand for bad and for good. All this Dizzy destroyed'. When Lord Granville wrote to Queen Victoria, Disraeli, born in 1804, had one more year to live; Gladstone, who was born in 1810, had another eighteen.
    [Show full text]
  • Mrs. Thatcher's Return to Victorian Values
    proceedings of the British Academy, 78, 9-29 Mrs. Thatcher’s Return to Victorian Values RAPHAEL SAMUEL University of Oxford I ‘VICTORIAN’was still being used as a routine term of opprobrium when, in the run-up to the 1983 election, Mrs. Thatcher annexed ‘Victorian values’ to her Party’s platform and turned them into a talisman for lost stabilities. It is still commonly used today as a byword for the repressive just as (a strange neologism of the 1940s) ‘Dickensian’ is used as a short-hand expression to describe conditions of squalor and want. In Mrs. Thatcher’s lexicon, ‘Victorian’ seems to have been an interchangeable term for the traditional and the old-fashioned, though when the occasion demanded she was not averse to using it in a perjorative sense. Marxism, she liked to say, was a Victorian, (or mid-Victorian) ideo1ogy;l and she criticised ninetenth-century paternalism as propounded by Disraeli as anachronistic.2 Read 12 December 1990. 0 The British Academy 1992. Thanks are due to Jonathan Clark and Christopher Smout for a critical reading of the first draft of this piece; to Fran Bennett of Child Poverty Action for advice on the ‘Scroungermania’ scare of 1975-6; and to the historians taking part in the ‘History Workshop’ symposium on ‘Victorian Values’ in 1983: Gareth Stedman Jones; Michael Ignatieff; Leonore Davidoff and Catherine Hall. Margaret Thatcher, Address to the Bow Group, 6 May 1978, reprinted in Bow Group, The Right Angle, London, 1979. ‘The Healthy State’, address to a Social Services Conference at Liverpool, 3 December 1976, in Margaret Thatcher, Let Our Children Grow Tall, London, 1977, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy
    Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy How do democracies form and what makes them die? Daniel Ziblatt revisits this timely and classic question in a wide-ranging historical narrative that traces the evolution of modern political democracy in Europe from its modest beginnings in 1830s Britain to Adolf Hitler’s 1933 seizure of power in Weimar Germany. Based on rich historical and quantitative evidence, the book offers a major reinterpretation of European history and the question of how stable political democracy is achieved. The barriers to inclusive political rule, Ziblatt finds, were not inevitably overcome by unstoppable tides of socioeconomic change, a simple triumph of a growing middle class, or even by working class collective action. Instead, political democracy’s fate surprisingly hinged on how conservative political parties – the historical defenders of power, wealth, and privilege – recast themselves and coped with the rise of their own radical right. With striking modern parallels, the book has vital implications for today’s new and old democracies under siege. Daniel Ziblatt is Professor of Government at Harvard University where he is also a resident fellow of the Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies. He is also currently Fernand Braudel Senior Fellow at the European University Institute. His first book, Structuring the State: The Formation of Italy and Germany and the Puzzle of Federalism (2006) received several prizes from the American Political Science Association. He has written extensively on the emergence of democracy in European political history, publishing in journals such as American Political Science Review, Journal of Economic History, and World Politics.
    [Show full text]