DOCSLIB.ORG

日本の調査団による遺跡調査一覧（2016 年 1 月〜 2016 年 12 月） Japanese Expeditions in 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
日本の調査団による遺跡調査一覧（2016 年 1 月〜 2016 年 12 月） Japanese Expeditions in 2016 日本の調査団による遺跡調査一覧（2016 年 1 月〜 2016 年 12 月） Japanese Expeditions in 2016 遺跡・調査地名 国名 調査代表者 調査機関 調査の種類 時期・時代 調査期間 Site Region Director Institution Research Type Age Research Period 東京大学総合研究博物館、アゼルバイジャン国 立科学アカデミー考古民族学研究所 西秋良宏、ファルハド・キリエフ ダムジリ アゼ ル バイジャン The University Museum, The University of 発掘調査 旧石器時代〜新石器時代 8月 NISHIAKI, Yoshihiro Damjili Azerbaijan Tokyo, Excavation Palaeolithic - Neolithic AUG GULIYEV, Farhad Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, Azerbaijan Academy of Sciences アラブ首長国連邦 ディバ海岸町跡 佐々木達夫 金沢大学 発掘調査 イスラーム時 代 1月〜2月 United Arab Dibba Coast site SASAKI, Tatsuo Kanazawa University Excavation Islamic period JAN - FEB Emirates 後期青銅器時代、後期鉄器時代、初期ロー 天理大学、立教大学ほか テル・レヘシュ イスラエ ル 桑原久男 発掘調査 マ時期 8月 Tenri University, Tel Rekhesh Israel KUWABARA, Hisao Excavation Late Bronze Age, Late Iron Age, Early AUG Rikkyo University, etc. Roman period イラク・クルディス スレマニ市周辺の先史時代遺跡 常木 晃 筑波大学 遺跡分布調査 旧石器時代〜新石器時代 9月〜10月 タン Prehistoric sites around Slemani TSUNEKI, Akira University of Tsukuba Survey Paleolithic - Neolithic SEP - OCT Iraq-Kurdistan 筑波大学、中部大学、国士舘大学 イラク・クルディス 西山伸一、常木 晃 測量調査・発掘調査 青銅器時代・鉄器時代（新アッシリア時代） ヤーシーン・テペ University of Tsukuba, 9月〜10月 タン NISHIYAMA, Shin'ichi Archaeological Survey Bronze Age and Iron Age (Neo-Assyrian Yasin Tepe Chubu University, SEP - OCT Iraq-Kurdistan TSUNEKI, Akira and Excavation period) Kokushikan University 東京大学総合研究博物館、イラン国立文化遺 産観光研究所 西 秋 良 宏 、ソニア・シドラング アンジリ イラン The University Museum, The University of 発掘調査 旧石器時代〜新石器時代 12 月〜 2017 年 1 月 NISHIAKI, Yoshihiro Anjiri Iran Tokyo, Excavation Palaeolithic - Neolithic DEC - JAN, 2017 日本の調査団による遺跡調査一覧（2016 年 1 月〜 12 月） SHIDRANG, Sonia Iranian Research Institute for Culutural Heritage and Tourism 東京大学総合研究博物館、ウズベキスタン国立 西 秋 良 宏 、 オタ ベ ク・アリプ ジャノフ 歴史博物館 カイナル・カマル ウズ ベ キスタン 発掘調査 新石器時代 7月〜8月 NISHIAKI, Yoshihiro The University Museum, The University of Kaynar Kamar Uzbekistan Excavation Neolithic JUL - AUG ARIPDJANOV, Otabek Tokyo, Uzbekistan State Museum of History 立正大学ウズベキスタン学術調査隊、ウズベキス タン科学アカデミー芸術学研究所 安田治 樹、シャキル・ピダエフ 発掘調査 カラ・テ ペ ウズ ベ キスタン Rissho University Uzbekistan Academic クシャン朝時代 9月 YASUDA, Haruki Excavation and Kara-tepe Uzbekistan Research Team, Kushan period SEP PIDAEV, Shakir Research The Fine Arts Research Scientific Institute of Academy of Arts of Uzbekistan 帝塚山大学、ウズベキスタン科学アカデミー考古 宇野隆夫、ベルディムロドフ・アム 学研究所 カ フィル ・ カ ラ 、 サ マ ル カ ンド ウズ ベ キスタン リデ ィン 発掘調査 7〜8世紀 8月〜9月 Tezukayama University, Kafir-Kala, Samarkand Uzbekistan UNO, Takao Excavation 7 - 8th centuries AUG - SEP The Institute of Archaeology of the BERDIMURODOV, Amridin Academy of Sciences of Uzbekistan 金沢大学、東日本国際大学エジプト考古学研究 所、早稲田大学エジプト学研究所 踏査・探査 北 サッカラ エ ジ プト 河合 望 Kanazawa University, Survey and 初期王朝時代〜新王国時代 5月、8月 North Saqqara Egypt KAWAI, Nozomu Institute of Egyptian Archaeology, Higashi geophysical Early Dynastic period - New Kingdom MAY, AUG Nippon International University, prospection Institute of Egyptology, Waseda University 179 西アジア考古学 第 18 号 （2017年） 180 遺跡・調査地名 国名 調査代表者 調査機関 調査の種類 時期・時代 調査期間 Site Region Director Institution Research Type Age Research Period 発掘調査・測量調査・ 前 1 千年紀（第 3 中間期〜プトレマイオス朝 アコリス エ ジ プト 川西宏幸 アコリス遺跡考古学調査団 踏査 期） 7月〜9月 Akoris Egypt KAWANISHI, Hiroyuki Akoris Archaeological Project Excavation, The first millennium BC (Third JUL - SEP Measurement, Survey Intermediate Period - Ptolemaic Era) アル＝コーカ地 区、ウセルハト墓（ 第 47 新王国時代、第 3 中間期、末期王朝時代、 号墓）およびその周辺地域 エ ジ プト 近藤二郎 早稲田大学エジプト学研究所 発掘調査 プトレマイオス朝時代 10 月〜 2017 年 1 月 The tomb of Userhat (TT47) and its Egypt KONDO, Jiro Institute of Egyptology, Waseda University Excavation New Kingdom, Third Intermediate OCT - JAN 2017 vicinity period, Late Dynasties, Ptolemaic Dynasty 遺跡分布調査・踏査 早稲田大学総合研究機構 コーム・アル＝ディバーゥ エ ジ プト 長谷川 奏 （物理探査・建築調査） ヘレニズム・ローマ時 代 8月〜9月 Comprehensive Research Organization, Kom al-Diba' Egypt HASEGAWA, So Geophysical and Hellenistic/Roman period AUG - SEP Waseda University architectural survey レネ・フリードマン、馬場匡浩 大英博物館、早稲田大学 ヒエラコンポリス エ ジ プト 発掘調査 先王朝時代 2月〜3月 FRIEDMAN, Renee The Brithish Museum, Hierakonpolis Egypt Excavation Predynastic period FEB - MAR BABA, Masahiro Waseda University 発掘調査・保存修復・ 東日本国際大学エジプト考古学研究所 組み立て復原 ギザ遺跡・クフ王第 2 の船 エ ジ プト 吉村作治 古王国時代 1月〜12月 Institute of Egyptian Archaeology, Higashi Excavation, Giza, the second boat of King Khufu Egypt YOSHIMURA, Sakuji Old Kingdom JAN - DEC Nippon International University Conservation and Reassembling 東日本国際大学エジプト考古学研究所 ギザ、西部墓地 エ ジ プト 吉村作治 踏査 古王国時代 8月 Institute of Egyptian Archaeology, Higashi Western cemetery at Giza Egypt YOSHIMURA, Sakuji Archaeological survey Old Kingdom AUG Nippon International University 東日本国際大学エジプト考古学研究所、早稲田 大学エジプト学研究所 アブ・シール南丘陵 エ ジ プト 吉村作治 発掘調査 青銅器時代〜イスラーム時代 8月 Institute of Egyptian Archaeology, Higashi Abusir South Egypt YOSHIMURA, Sakuji Excavation Bronze Age - Islamic period AUG Nippon International University, Institute of Egyptology, Waseda University バート遺跡群 オマーン 近藤康久 総合地球環境学研究所 発掘調査 青銅器時代〜イスラーム時代 1 月、12 月〜2017 年 1 月 Bat Oman KONDO, Yasuhisa Research Institute for Humanity and Nature Excavation Bronze Age - Islamic period JAN, DEC - JAN 2017 国士舘大学イラク古代文化研究所、中央アジア・ 大沼克彦、アイダ・アブディカノワ アメリカ 大 学 モ ル・ブラク キルギス 発掘調査 青銅器時代〜初期中世 8月 OHNUMA, Katsuhiko Institute for Cultural Studies of Ancient Mol Bulak Kyrgyz Excavation Bronze Age - Early Medieval AUG ABDYKANOVA, Aida Iraq, Kokushikan University, American University of Central Asia 帝京大学シルクロード学術調査団、キルギス共 和国国立科学アカデミー歴史文化遺産研究所 山内和也、バキット・アマンバエヴァ アク・ベ シム キルギス Teikyo University, 発掘調査 カラハン朝時代 4月〜5月 YAMAUCHI, Kazuya Ak-Beshim Kyrgyz Institute of History and Cultural Heritage, Excavation Kara Khanid period APR - MAY AMANBAEVA, Bakit National Academy of Science, Kyrgyz Republic ワディ・シャルマ遺跡群 サウジアラビア 藤井純夫 金沢大学 発掘調査 銅石器時代〜前期青銅器時代 3月、12月 Wadi Sharma Sites Saudi Arabia FUJII, Sumio Kanazawa University Excavation Chalcolithic - Early Bronze Age MAR, DEC 中近東文化センター附属アナトリア考古学研究所 カ マ ン・カレ ホ ユック トルコ 大村幸弘 Japanese Institute of Anatolian 発掘調査 前期青銅器時代〜鉄器時代 6月〜9月 Kaman-Kalehöyük Turkey OMURA, Sachihiro Archaeology, The Middle Eastern Culture Excavation Early Bronze - Iron Age JUN - SEP Center in Japan 中近東文化センター附属アナトリア考古学研究所 新石器時代〜ビザンツ/ オスマン時代 クルシェヒル、ヨズガット県 トルコ 大村幸弘 Japanese Institute of Anatolian 遺跡踏査 11 月 Neolithic - Byzantine/Ottoman Empire Kırşehir, Yozgat Provinces Turkey OMURA, Sachihiro Archaeology, The Middle Eastern Culture Archaeological survey NOV periods Center in Japan 遺跡・調査地名 国名 調査代表者 調査機関 調査の種類 時期・時代 調査期間 Site Region Director Institution Research Type Age Research Period 中近東文化センター附属アナトリア考古学研究所 ヤッス ホ ユック トルコ 大村正子 Japanese Institute of Anatolian 発掘調査 前期青銅器時代〜鉄器時代 8月〜11月 Yassıhöyük Turkey OMURA, Masako Archaeology, The Middle Eastern Culture Excavation Early Bronze - Iron Age AUG - NOV Center in Japan 紺谷亮一、フィクリ・クラックオウル ノートルダム清心女子大学、アンカラ大学 カイセリ県 トルコ 踏査 新石器時代〜イスラーム時代 8月〜10月 KONTANI, Ryoichi Notre Dame Seishin University, Kayseri Turkey Survey Neolithic - Islamic periods AUG - OCT KULAKOĞLU, Fikri Ankara University 紺谷亮一、フィクリ・クラックオウル ノートルダム清心女子大学、アンカラ大学 キュルテペ 北トレンチ トルコ 発掘調査 前期青銅器時代 8月〜9月 KONTANI, Ryoichi Notre Dame Seishin University, Kültepe, Northern trench Turkey Excavation Early Bronze Age AUG - SEP KULAKOĞLU, Fikri Ankara University 中近東文化センター附属アナトリア考古学研究所 ビ ュクリュカレ トルコ 松村公仁 Japanese Institute of Anatolian 発掘調査 中期青銅器時代〜鉄器時代 4月〜6月 Büklükale Turkey MATSUMURA, Kimiyoshi Archaeology, The Middle Eastern Culture Excavation Middle Bronze Age - Iron Age APR-JUN Center in Japan ワ ー デ ィー ・ アッ＝ サ イ ル バハレーン 後藤 健 日本バハレーン考古学調査団 発掘調査 前期ディルムン時代 1月 Wadi as-Sail Bahrain GOTOH, Takeshi Japanese Archaeological Team in Bahrain Excavation Early Dilmun JAN 慶應義塾大学、パレスチナ自治政府観光考古省 杉本智俊、ハムダン・タハ ベ イ ティン パレスチナ Keio University, 発掘調査 ビザンツ時代〜マムルーク時代 8月 SUGIMOTO, David T. Beitin Palestine Palestine National Authority, Ministry of Excavation Byzantine - Mamluk periods AUG TAHA, Hamdan Tourism and Antiquities ハラアト・ジュハイラ遺跡群 ヨルダン 藤井純夫 金沢大学 発掘調査 先土器新石器時代 B 期 6月、8月〜9月 Harrat Juhayra Sites Jordan FUJII, Sumio Kanazawa University Excavation PPNB JUN, AUG - SEP 国士舘大学イラク古代文化研究所 ウム・カイス ／ ガダラ ヨルダン 松本 健 保存修復 ローマ時代（2 世紀） 1月〜12月 Kokushikan University, The Instiute for Umm Qais / Gadara Jordan MATSUMOTO, Ken Conservation Roman Period (2nd century AD) JAN - DEC Cultural Studies of Ancient Iraq カルハ山（トール・ハマル、ワディ・アガル、 日本の調査団による遺跡調査一覧（2016 年 1 月～ 12 月） トール・ファワズ 、トール・アエイド） ヨルダン 門脇誠二 名古屋大学 発掘調査 上部旧石器時代 7月〜8月 Jebel Qalkha (Tor Hamar, Wadi Jordan KADOWAKI, Seiji Nagoya University Excavation Upper Palaeolithic JUL - AUG Aghar, Tor Fawaz, Tor Aeid) レバノン南部地域（ベカー高原南端およ 西山伸一、ジャニン・アブドゥル＝ びマルジュアイユーン地区） レバノン大学、中部大学 レ バノン マッシ ー ハ 考古学踏査 青銅器・鉄器時代〜イスラーム時代 8月 South Lebanon Area (the Southern Lebanese University, Lebanon NISHIYAMA, Shin'ichi Archaeological Survey Bronze/Iron Age - Islamic period AUG Beqaa Valley and the Marjayoun Chubu University ABDUL MASSIH, Jeanine areas) 181.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reviews Reconfiguring the Silk Road. New
    Reviews Reconfiguring the Silk Road. New Research on East-West Exchange in Antiquity. The Papers of a Symposium Held at the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology March 19, 2011. Ed. Victor H. Mair; Jane Hickman. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Mu- seum of Archaeology and Anthropology, 2014. xvi + 104 pp. ISBN-13? 978-1-934536-68-1. he “Silk Road” as we thought we knew it has been sion of the silk roads (which were many and included T subject to “reconfiguring” for a good many years importantly maritime routes) should not just focus now, thanks in no small part to the prodigious efforts on Rome and China. The earlier history of western of Victor Mair, the convener of the symposium whose Asia and northeast Africa are important, as the evi- papers he and his colleague Jane Hickman (editor of dence for Eurasian exchange under the Achaemenids the Penn Museum’s excellent Expedition magazine) and Alexander’s successors makes very clear. Little of have edited into this attractively presented book. The this is news, but to have it emphasized in this way is occasion for the symposium was the exhibition of ar- valuable. tefacts excavated in Xinjiang which Mair organized The distinguished historian of Late Antiquity Peter and whose last stop on its U.S. tour was Philadelphia.1 Brown reminds readers how some of the most im- It is difficult to imagine a more appropriate and dis- portant early explorations of the Silk Road a century tinguished group of presenters, whose papers are here ago were inspired by the effort to find Late Antiquity published.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hephthalite Numismatics
    THE HEPHTHALITE NUMISMATICS Aydogdy Kurbanov 1. Introduction Arabic – Haital, Hetal, Heithal, Haiethal, Central Asia and neighbouring countries have a Heyâthelites. In Arabic sources the Hephtha- very old and rich history. A poorly-studied and in- lites, though they are mentioned as Haitals, tricate period of this region is the early medieval are sometimes also refered to as Turks. period (4th - 6th centuries AD). During this time, In the 4th - 6th centuries AD the territory of Cen- “The Great movement of peoples”, the migration tral Asia included at least four major political en- of nomadic peoples (Huns) from Asia to Europe, tities, among them Kushans, Chionites, Kidarites, took place. In South and Central Asia, great em- and Hephthalites. Discussions about the origins pires existed, including Sasanian Iran, Gupta and of these peoples still continue. Ideas vary from some small states. Across Central Asia, mysteri- the Hephthalites considered as part of the Hun ous new peoples appeared: the Hephthalites, the confederation to different other origins. It is also Kidarites and the Chionites, among others. Their uncertain whether the Hephthalites, the Kidarites origins are still debated. Some scholars suppose and the Chionites had a common or different ori- that they were part of a Hun confederation, while gins – that is, are they three branches of the same others suppose they had different origins. ethnic group or are they culturally, linguistically, Generally, the early research on the Hephthalites and genetically distinct from one another? was based only on written sources. They were The Hephthalites are well represented in their mentioned for the fi rst time in AD 361 at the siege coins.
    [Show full text]
  • Ai Khanoum After 145 Bc the Post-Palatial Occupation*
    Ancient Civilizations from Scythia to Siberia 24 (2018) 354-419 brill.com/acss Ai Khanoum after 145 bc The Post-Palatial Occupation* Laurianne Martinez-Sève** University of Lille [email protected] Abstract The attack that caused the ruin of Ai Khanoum around 145 BC was a key event of its history. This was the beginning of the so-called post-palatial period, which is often considered of short duration. The article intends to provide a general study of this last stage of the history of the city, taking into account the information already published, but also the new evidence resulting from the ongoing study of its main sanctuary (henceforth the Sanctuary). The few inhabitants of Ai Khanoum still living in the city after 145 BC reoccupied its private and public buildings and were engaged in the recovering of all the riches of the former Graeco-Bactrian capital. They exploited the stone materials, the metallic objects, the furniture and even reused the ceramics abandoned in the town. The Sanctuary remained in activity for a while, under the control of an authority who undertook maintenance operations, but the religious conceptions of the population underwent some major changes. This study also enables to review the common assumptions regarding the role played by nomadic people during this period. Keywords Hellenistic Bactria – Ai Khanoum – Post-palatial period – the Temple with Indented Niches – cults – recovering activities – Yuezhi – Sakā * I wish to thank F. Grenet, G. Lecuyot, B. Lyonnet, M. Minardi, C. Rapin and S. Watson for their accurate assistance and comments. But I alone am responsible for the opinions expressed in the paper.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 the Kushano-Sasanian Kingdom
    ISBN 978-92-3-103211-0 State organization and administration 4 THE KUSHANO-SASANIAN KINGDOM* A. H. Dani and B. A. Litvinsky Contents State organization and administration .......................... 107 Economy, society and trade ............................... 112 Religious life ...................................... 113 Cities, architecture, art and crafts ............................ 115 Languages and scripts .................................. 121 In the early centuries of the Christian era the names of two great empires stand out boldly in the history of Central Asia. The first was Kushanshahr, named after the Great Kushan emperors, who held sway from the Amu Darya (Oxus) valley to the Indus and at times as far as the Ganges. Here flourished the traditions of the Kushans, who had brought together the political, economic, social and religious currents of the time from the countries with which they had dealings (see Chapter 7). The second great empire (which rose to challenge Kushan power) was Eranshahr, which expanded both westward and eastward under the new Sasanian dynasty. Its eastern advance shook Kushan power to its foundation. State organization and administration According to Cassius Dio (LXXX, 4) and Herodian (VI, 2.2), Ardashir I (226– 241), who waged many wars, intended to reconquer those lands which had originally belonged to the Persians. He defeated the Parthian kings and conquered Mesopotamia – an event which led to his wars with the Romans. It is more difficult to judge his conquests in the east. According to the inscription of Shapur I (241–271) at Naqsh-i Rustam, ‘under the rule of * See Map 2. 107 ISBN 978-92-3-103211-0 State organization and administration shahanshah [king of kings] Ardashir’ were Satarop, king of Abrenak (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Castles, Walls, Fortresses. the Sasanian Effort to Defend the Territory
    HISTORIA I ŚWIAT, nr 9 (2020) ISSN 2299 - 2464 Meysam LABBAF-KHANIKI (University of Tehran, Iran) Castles, Walls, Fortresses. The Sasanian Effort to Defend the Territory https://doi.org/10.34739/his.2020.09.03 Abstract: Defensive structures have been applied as the permanent elements of the Iranian urbanism, from the first phases of sedentism in the Neolithic period onwards. Following the Iranian tradition in architecture, Sasanian fortifications having local features were constructed in adaptation with the regional circumstances. Nevertheless, we can find some similarities in the components of the defensive installations. The defensive structures located within the Sasanian territory turned Iran into the unconquerable fortress providing Sasanians with military, political, cultural, and economic dominance over a vast area of the ancient world for more than four centuries. Key words: Fortress, Defensive Fortifications, Sasanian Period, Iran, Linear Walls Introduction Castles and defensive buildings have been playing an important role in the Iranian history of architecture. As an architectural tradition, almost all the historical settlements in Iran have been enclosed by the massive walls which were occasionally equipped with watchtowers and forts and because of the defensive appearance of the settlements, the modern Iranian villagers call still their settlements ‘Qal‘eh’ meaning castle in Persian. Due to the continuous tradition of defensive architecture over history, it is difficult to apply comparative methods to estimate the date of enclosing or linear walls, towers, and forts. On the other hand, the defensive structures were commonly erected over the ruins of ancient structures and therefore includes the various portions dating back to the different phases.
    [Show full text]
  • Karakoram Himalayas and Central Asia. the Buddhist Connection
    RUDN Journal of World History 2018 Vol. 10 No 2 109–125 Вестник РУДН. Серия: ВСЕОБЩАЯ ИСТОРИЯ http://journals.rudn.ru/world-history DOI: 10.22363/2312-8127-2018-10-2-109-125 KARAKORAM HIMALAYAS AND CENTRAL ASIA. THE BUDDHIST CONNECTION K. Warikoo Jawaharlal Nehru University New Delhi 110067, INDIA The Karakoram-Himalayan region is the cradle from where ancient Indian culture in- cluding Buddhism spread to different directions in Central Asia, East Asia and South East Asia. Gilgit, Chilas, Chitral, Baltistan, Ladakh, Zanskar and other frontier areas have been important mileposts on the famous Silk Route. Buddhist savants from India contributed to the spread of Buddhism in Central Asia and East Asia. One of the eminent scholars was Kumarajiva (344–413 AD) who broke political, geographical, cultural and linguistic barriers for propaga- tion of Buddhism. Hieun Tsiang mentions four important centres of Buddhism in Central Asia – Shan-shan (Kroraina), Khotan, Kucha and Turfan. Kashmir played an important role in intro- ducing Buddhism to Khotan, which in turn played a key role in the transmission of Buddhism to China. Several important places on the Silk Route system such as Kucha, Balkh, Bamiyan, Khotan, Kashgar etc. developed into important centres of Buddhism when parts of Central Asia and north-western India were integrated into a single kingdom under the Kushans.) Keywords: Karakoram-Himalayas, Gilgit, Chilas, Chitral, Baltistan, Zanskar, Ladakh, Kashmir, Kucha, Kashgar, Khotan, Buddhism, Kumarajiva, Hiuen Tsianmg, Lotus Sutra, Kan- ishka, Palola Sahis) Introduction. Abutting the borders of Afghanistan, China, Pakistan and India and being situated in close proximity to Central Asia, the Karakoram-Himalayan region has been an important constituent of India’s trans-Himalayan communica- tion network in the continent and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Cal and Archaeometrical Information on the Excavation of Kara Tepe. Evanthia Tsantini, Verònica Martínez and Josep M Gurt
    IPAEB. Volume I Results of all the available archaeologi- cal and archaeometrical information on the excavation of Kara Tepe. Evanthia Tsantini, Verònica Martínez and Josep M Gurt Archaeometrical estudy of ceramic material from kiln 2 Introduction In Uzbekistan a number of archaeometrical studies were done during the 1980’s and early 90’s using chemical and mineralogical analysis, notably by S. V. Vivdenko and A. Abdurazakov. The first analysed shards from a number of sites mostly dated to the Iron Age but also from the Kushan period at Jalangtush Tepe [Vivdenko 1987, 1987a, 1990, 1992, 1993, 1994 and 1996]. Abdurazakov also analysed a few sherds, mainly dated to the Bronze Age but including some from the Kushan period at sites such as Mirzakul’ Tepe and Talashkan Tepe [Abdurazakov, Bezborodov et alii. 1963, Abdurazakov 1988, Abdurazakov 1996, Abdurazakov, Dzhalalova 1986, Abdurazakov 1987]. None of this work had the necessary continuation neither was based on the definition of Reference Groups (RG) of Paste Compositional Reference Units (PCRU) which is a fundamental process in the mark of provenience studies in order to attempt to locate the origin or the production site where the pottery was made [Picon, 1984; Buxeda et al.,1995]. The present work is centred to the study of production and possible local distribution of ceramics dated in the Kushan period sampled at one of the ceramic kilns of Kara Tepe (Table 1) (Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8). It aims, also, to study the technological aspects of fabrication of these ceramics. In order to cover these subjects an archaeometric study of a total of 50 samples (Table 1) has been carried out by applying chemical and mineralogical techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracta Iranica, Volume 37-38-39 | 2018, « Comptes Rendus Des Publications De 2014-2016 » [En Ligne], Mis En Ligne Le 10 Mars 2018, Consulté Le 01 Novembre 2020
    Abstracta Iranica Revue bibliographique pour le domaine irano-aryen Volume 37-38-39 | 2018 Comptes rendus des publications de 2014-2016 Édition électronique URL : http://journals.openedition.org/abstractairanica/42410 DOI : 10.4000/abstractairanica.42410 ISBN : 1961-960X ISSN : 1961-960X Éditeur : CNRS (UMR 7528 Mondes iraniens et indiens), Éditions de l’IFRI Référence électronique Abstracta Iranica, Volume 37-38-39 | 2018, « Comptes rendus des publications de 2014-2016 » [En ligne], mis en ligne le 10 mars 2018, consulté le 01 novembre 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/abstractairanica/42410 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/abstractairanica. 42410 Ce document a été généré automatiquement le 1 novembre 2020. Tous droits réservés 1 NOTE DE LA RÉDACTION Ce numéro triple d'Abstracta Iranica 37-38-39 s'ouvre quelques mois après la clôture du numéro triple 34-35-36. Ce nouveau numéro, qui recense les publications de 2014-2015-2016, est comme le précédent un numéro « ouvert » présentant les recensions reçues depuis plusieurs mois et il restera ouvert jusqu'en décembre 2018, date à laquelle démarrera le numéro suivant. Nous espérons ainsi retrouver notre rythme habituel de publications des recensions en résorbant le retard imposé par des éléments externes et internes à la revue. Dorénavant, le principe de numéro « ouvert » reste valable pour tous les numéros futurs et la mise en ligne sera opérée plusieurs fois par an, par paquet de 100 à 200 comptes rendus. De la sorte les recensions adressées par les contributeurs seront disponibles en ligne quelques mois plus tard. Plus de visibilité et une plus grande rapidité et, par conséquent, une meilleure diffusion devraient refaire d'Abstracta Iranica une référence indispensable de l'information et de la critique de l'ensemble des publications sur le monde iranien.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hephthalites: Archaeological and Historical Analysis
    THE HEPHTHALITES: ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL ANALYSIS Written by AYDOGDY KURBANOV PhD thesis submitted to the Department of History and Cultural Studies of the Free University, Berlin 2010 Supervisors: PD Dr. N. Boroffka Prof. Dr. R. Bernbeck Members of Commission: Prof. Dr. S. Hansen Prof. Dr. S. Pollock Dr. H.-J. Nüsse The date of the examination: 12.02.2010 TO MY PARENTS “The information coming from remote countries and foreign languages are subject to corruption and misunderstanding and, moreover, concerning very ancient time. So we do not know what is certain. (Thus) it is impossible to decide (the origin of the Hephthalites)” Wei Jie (7th century AD) C O N T E N T S 1. Introduction 2. Research history and methodic problems 2.1. Research history 2.2. Methodic problems 3. Archaeological sites and materials 4. Numismatics 5. Written sources 6. A history of the Hephthalites 6.1. Origins 6.2. Military history & wars 6.3. Socio-political structure and state 6.4. Linguistics 6.5. Religion 6.6. Change of ethnic identity Literature Illustrations ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many people have helped me during the work on my PhD thesis. I would like to thank first of all PD Dr. N. Boroffka for enormous help in editing and proofreading the draft version, for his patience and comments, and Prof. R. Bernbeck who helped to bring this work into its current form. I am very grateful to Prof. S. Hansen for his advice and particularly for the conditions of work in the Eurasia Department of the German Archaeological Institute, which offered me good possibilities to finish this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinship and Religious Identities in Medieval Central Asia (8Th-13Th C
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations Arts & Sciences Spring 5-15-2018 Kinship and Religious Identities in Medieval Central Asia (8th-13th c. CE): Tracing Communities of Mortuary Practice and Biological Affinity Elissa Anne Bullion Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds Part of the Biological and Physical Anthropology Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Bullion, Elissa Anne, "Kinship and Religious Identities in Medieval Central Asia (8th-13th c. CE): Tracing Communities of Mortuary Practice and Biological Affinity" (2018). Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1516. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds/1516 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Arts & Sciences at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS Department of Anthropology Dissertation Examination Committee: Michael D. Frachetti, Chair Kari Allen Sarah Baitzel Tristram R. Kidder Erik Trinkaus Hayrettin Yucesoy Kinship and Religious Identities in Medieval Central Asia (8th-13th c. CE): Tracing Communities of Mortuary Practice and Biological Affinity
    [Show full text]
  • Early Buddhist Art of China and Central Asia
    EARLY BUDDHIST ART OF CHINA AND CENTRAL ASIA VOLUME ONE Later Han, Three Kingdoms and Western Chin in China and Bactria to Shan-shan in Central Asia BY MARYLIN MARTIN RHIE BRILL LEIDEN • BOSTON • KOLN 1999 CONTENTS Acknowledgements xiii Preface by Erik Ziircher xv Abbreviated List of Illustrations, Maps and Drawings xvii Introduction xxxv PART I THE BEGINNINGS OF BUDDHISM AND BUDDHIST ART IN CHINA CHAPTER ONE: The Han Dynasty (206 B.C-220 A.D.) 5 I. The Opening of China to the West 5 A. The Former Han Period (206 B.C.-8 A.D.) 5 B. The Later Han Period (25-220 A.D.) 11 II. Written Evidences of Buddhism 13 III. Translators and Translations of Buddhist Texts 22 IV. Buddhist Art 27 A. K'ung-wang Shan (Kiangsu) 27 1. Images of Popular Religious Belief 29 2. Buddhist Images 33 3. Other Images 39 4. Technique and Historical Conditions 42 5. Conclusions 45 B. Evidences from Tombs in Szechwan and Kansu 47 1. Cave Tomb No. IX at Ma Hao 47 2. Buddha Images on "Money Trees" 56 a. Ceramic money tree base from P'eng shan 56 b. Buddhas on the money tree from Mien-yang 59 3. The Pagoda Relief Tile from Shih-fang 61 4. The Tomb at Lei-t'ai, Wu Wei 64 C. Miniature Bronze Shrine (Asian Art Museum) 67 VIII CONTENTS D. Harvard Flame-shouldered Buddha 71 1. Descriptive and Comparative Analysis of Technique and Style . 73 2. Considerations of Dating, Provenance, Iconography, Historical Circumstances and Interpretation 89 V. Conclusions 94 CHAPTER TWO: Period of the Three Kingdoms and the Western Chin (A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Silk Road Vol 12 2014
    ISSN 2152-7237 (print) ISSN 2153-2060 (online) The Silk Road Volume 12 2014 Contents Silk Road Dress in a Chinese Tomb: Xu Xianxiu and Sixth-Century Cosmopolitanism, by Kate A. Lingley .......................................................................................................................... 1 Images of the Early Turks in Chinese Murals and Figurines from the Recently-Discovered Tomb in Mongolia, by Sergey A. Yatsenko ................................................................................................................... 13 Connections between Central Asia and the Northern Littoral of the Black Sea: the Evidence from Objects with Tamgas, by Sergey V. Voroniatov ................................................................................................................. 25 Some Examples of Central Asian Decorative Elements in Ajanta and Bagh Indian Paintings, by Matteo Compareti ................................................................................................................... 39 The Afrasiab Murals: a Pictorial Narrative Reconsidered, by Guitty Azarpay ........................................................................................................................ 49 The Performance of Pain and Remembrance in Late Ancient Iran, by Touraj Daryaee and Soodabeh Malekzadeh ..................................................................... 57 Russo-Polovtsian Dynastic Contacts as Reflected in Genealogy and Onomastics, by Anna Litvina and Fjodor Uspenskij .............................................................................
    [Show full text]