David Fort Godshalk. Veiled Visions: The 1906 Race Riot and the Reshaping of American Race Relations. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2005. xvi + 384 pp. $59.95, cloth, ISBN 978-0-8078-2962-2.

Reviewed by Keith Volanto

Published on H-South (November, 2006)

September 2006 marks the hundredth an‐ in a deliberately infammatory style geared to‐ niversary of the horrifc Atlanta race riot. In wards inciting the emotions of its readers. Veiled Visions, historian David Godshalk goes be‐ In these early chapters, Godshalk also intro‐ yond merely retelling the details of the racial mas‐ duces readers to the views of preeminent African sacre. Instead, the author provides the frst book- American leaders amid the deteriorating racial length analysis of this tumultuous riot's far-reach‐ climate. It was in Atlanta ten years earlier, the au‐ ing efects on the city of Atlanta and American thor reminds us, that Booker T. Washington deliv‐ race relations. ered his famous Exposition Address outlining his The book's opening three chapters portray At‐ accommodationist approach to the denial of black lanta in 1906 as a rapidly growing commercial civil rights: if focused on hard hub, receiving a constant infux of new white and work, maintained their sobriety, and followed a black rural migrants. Along with this frenetic ac‐ proper moral code of conduct, white prejudices tivity came marginalization of the white working would gradually dissipate and blacks would gain class, increased commingling of the races, and a their proper place in southern society as social host of local newspapers locked in such a desper‐ equals. This view had already been challenged ate competition for white readership that they re‐ during the pre-riot years by a group of local black sorted to race baiting in order to increase sales. intellectuals led by Atlanta University professor Throughout the summer of 1906, Atlanta's papers W. E. B. Du Bois. Before the riot, however, their continuously reported instances of local black-on- protests were largely limited to the written word white crime, especially stories of women claiming and organizing into small groups to spread their to have been raped by black men. Oftentimes, message of nonacceptance of the status quo post‐ mere allegations were presented as determined bellum. fact. Further, the papers presented these reports And then the riot came. Godshalk's fourth chapter details all the bitter elements of the con‐ H-Net Reviews fagration. On a Saturday afternoon (September though only among white and black elites. The 22), local whites in the Five Points section of racial violence hurt Booker T. Washington's agen‐ downtown Atlanta erupted upon hearing new re‐ da nationally among many infuential racial pro‐ ports of yet another white woman claiming to gressives. The riot convinced many white north‐ have been violated by a black assailant. Young ern supporters, especially The Nation publisher whites, primarily working-class men (though sup‐ Oswald Garrison Villard, that Washington's ac‐ plemented with many middle- and upper-class commodationist approach was no longer valid. adults) began to rampage through Five Points Villard increasingly criticized Washington and be‐ searching for black quarry in an irrational at‐ gan to support direct agitation for black rights, tempt to "impose their own visions of order on a though always resolutely distancing himself from rapidly changing city" (p. 88). The rioters focused any advocacy of violence. W. E. B. Du Bois was special attention on blacks riding the downtown also radicalized by the event. Though he had been streetcars. From Five Points, the crowd fanned disafected with Washington's views for some out along side streets and began to attack black time, Du Bois was so agitated by the rampage that businesses and their employees. Throughout the he eventually left Atlanta. Soon, he joined Villard evening, local police were either unable, or un‐ and others to form the NAACP in an efort to agi‐ willing, to turn back the rioters. Order was not re‐ tate for change on racial matters through litiga‐ stored on this frst night of violence until 3:00 a.m. tion and federal legislation. Sunday morning, when the militia fnally arrived Godshalk convincingly shows that while about the same time as a deluge from a timely Booker T. Washington's star was falling among rainstorm. many disafected black leaders and former white For the next several days, most downtown allies, his approach to resolving racial confict at commerce ceased as blacks refused to return to the local level through white and black elite dis‐ work, preferring to stay home to defend their course and deal making began to take hold in At‐ families and property. Over the next two nights, lanta. The author relates how mob violence ap‐ gangs of whites continued to roam the streets in palled many white civic leaders. Destruction of search of black victims. On Sunday and Monday private property, business shutdowns, and fear of nights, armed whites marched into two separate negative publicity, not to mention the possibility black neighborhoods, but were repulsed in both of black retaliatory attacks, led them to seek out instances by armed black defenders. The violence cooperative black leaders. The white leaders fnally abated by Tuesday morning. The damage pledged to do their part in controlling the roguish was extensive. Conservative estimates list over elements of their community, if the black elites (in twenty-fve blacks (and two whites) killed and one instance Godshalk refers to them as "collabo‐ over one hundred wounded. Untold property and rators," p. 1) would strive to do the same while business losses were coupled with a major stain forsaking agitation on civil rights matters. on Atlanta's image as a racially progressive city. The author focuses on Rev. Henry Hugh Proc‐ Chapters 5-11 deal with the riot's legacy and tor as a prime example of a black community make up the core of the book. Godshalk blends leader with whom the white civic leaders were secondary sources with a wide array of relevant able to break bread. Though a close friend of private papers of the principal players involved to W.E.B. Du Bois and a sympa‐ detail how the riot divided the black community, thizer before the riot, Proctor abandoned protest greatly upset many white Atlanta civic leaders, in the post-riot years in favor of interracial dia‐ and paved the way for local interracial dialogue, logue with white leaders. Godshalk shows how

2 H-Net Reviews

Proctor began to accommodate white elites on book. Specifcally, there are too many instances law and order issues as well as civil rights mat‐ when the author uses an individual's race as an ters. In return, he was able to use his access to the adjective when clarifcation is clearly not neces‐ white power structure to expand his infuence sary. Godshalk often refers to W. E. B. Du Bois, for within the black community by acting as a broker example, as "the black professor" (p. 160). Other on a variety of civic matters (in addition to secur‐ individuals are frequently described as "the white ing vital funding for his church). Beginning with speaker" (p. 128), "the white lawyer" (p. 154), "the Proctor, many other local black elites spoke out black religious leader" (p. 174), or "the black jour‐ publicly against black criminals and confronta‐ nalist" (p. 174). These word choices reappear so tional forms of civil rights agitation. In return, often that it detracts from the narrative. these black leaders were rewarded with an ele‐ Nevertheless, this frst comprehensive efort vated status and symbolic participation in public to explore the long-term local and national impact afairs, while the black community was largely of the Atlanta race riot is a solid contribution to able to avoid further grand racial conficts with southern history and to the history of American local whites. race relations. In his fnal chapter, Godshalk reveals how the Atlanta tradition of biracial elite discourse has worked to dampen racial violence, but at the cost of delayed social integration and persistent pover‐ ty. During the 1950s and 1960s, for example, a se‐ ries of quiet negotiated agreements between white and black elites led to Atlanta avoiding ma‐ jor turmoil during the active phase of the Civil Rights Movement. The city's schools desegregated without violence, but educational integration took place at a glacial pace. Lunch counters and other forms of public accommodations were likewise lethargically integrated before the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Further, the wages of racial peace remain high, down to the present day. Atlanta remains a highly stratifed city with tremendous economic disparity. It has the highest residential segrega‐ tion index of any major U.S. urban area, while only four major American cities have a higher poverty rate. Thus, the author concludes: "At‐ lanta's biracial traditions hushed the white racial hatreds of the past, but only at the cost of veiling promising black visions of America's future" (p. 278). Overall, both the research and the clarity of argument are solid. The only criticism I wish to register is a minor one involving a rather annoy‐ ing choice of prose recurring throughout the

3 H-Net Reviews

If there is additional discussion of this review, you may access it through the network, at https://networks.h-net.org/h-south

Citation: Keith Volanto. Review of Godshalk, David Fort. Veiled Visions: The and the Reshaping of American Race Relations. H-South, H-Net Reviews. November, 2006.

URL: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=12548

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.

4