DOCSLIB.ORG

NATO's Response to Hybrid Threats

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NATO's Response to Hybrid Threats NATO’s Response to Hybrid Threats Guillaume Lasconjarias and Jeffrey A. Larsen Editors Foreword by General Philip Breedlove Supreme Allied Commander Europe Founded in 1951, the NATO Defense College (NDC) was established to contribute to the effectiveness and cohesion of the Atlantic Alliance through its role as a major centre of education, study and research on Euro-Atlantic security issues. The NDC Research Division serves as a key forum for discussion and objective analysis of contemporary NATO policy challenges, as well as a central pillar of the College’s outreach activities. NATO’s Response to Hybrid Threats Edited by Guillaume Lasconjarias and Jeffrey A. Larsen Foreword by General Philip M. Breedlove Supreme Allied Commander Europe NATO DEFENSE COLLEGE NATO Defense College Cataloguing in Publication-Data: “NATO’s Response to Hybrid Threats” (NATO Defense College “NDC Forum Papers Series”) Forum Paper 24 Edited by Guillaume Lasconjarias and Jeffrey A. Larsen Copy-editing: Claudia A. Vitiello Cover photo by “[David Orcea] @ 123RF.com” Cover design by Jeffrey A. Larsen and Lucia Valeriani ISBN: 978-88-96898-12-3 The views expressed in this NDC Forum Paper are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the NATO Defense College, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or any of the institutions represented by the contributors. The Research Division (RD) of the NATO Defense College provides NATO’s senior leaders with sound and timely analysis and recommendations on current issues of particular concern for the Alliance. Papers produced by the Research Division convey NATO’s position to the wider audience of the international strategic community and contribute to strengthening of the transatlantic link. The RD’s civil and military researchers come from a variety of disciplines and interests covering a broad spectrum of security-related issues. They conduct research on topics which are of interest to the political and military decision-making bodies of the Alliance and its member states. Portions of this NDC Forum Paper may be quoted or reprinted without special permission for academic purposes, provided that a standard source credit line is included. © NDC 2015 all right reserved Limited copies of this NDC Forum Paper are available and may be obtained directly from NATO Defense College, Research Division Via Giorgio Pelosi, 1 - 00143 Rome, Italy Fax +39-06-50 52 57 97 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ndc.nato.int https://twitter.com/NDC_Research https://facebook.com/NDC_Research Printed and bound by DeBooks Italia srl V.le G. Mazzini 41, 00195 Rome, Italy www.debooks.us iii Table of Contents List of Figures, Maps, and Images vi Contributors vii List of Acronyms xvii Foreword General Philip M. Breedlove xxi Preface Major General Janusz Bojarski xxvii Acknowledgements xxix 1 Introduction: A New Way of Warfare 1 Guillaume Lasconjarias and Jeffrey Larsen A New Strategic Dimension: Russia as a Geopolitical Game-Changer 15 2 What Mid-Term Future for Putin’s Russia? 17 Stéfanie Babst 3 Cold War Déjà Vu? NATO, Russia and the Crisis in Ukraine 41 Roger McDermott, Heidi Reisinger, and Brooke Smith-Windsor 4 Back to the Future? Russia’s Hybrid Warfare, Revolutions in Military Affairs, and Cold War Comparisons 49 Diego A. Ruiz Palmer 5 Russia’s 2014 Military Doctrine and Beyond: Threat Perceptions, Capabilities and Ambitions 73 Polina Sinovets and Bettina Renz iv A New Type of Warfare 93 6 Hybrid Warfare in the Strategic Spectrum: An Historical Assessment 95 Élie Tenenbaum 7 Russia’s Hybrid Warfare: Waging War below the Radar of Traditional Collective Defence 113 Heidi Reisinger and Alexander Golts 8 Russia’s Approach to Conflict: Implications for NATO’s Deterrence and Defence 137 Dave Johnson Case Studies 161 9 Hybrid Warfare: Iranian and Russian Versions of “Little Green Men” and Contemporary Conflict 163 Hall Gardner 10 Energy as a Tool of Hybrid Warfare 189 Michael Rühle and Julijus Grubliauskas 11 The Transnistrian Conflict in the Context of Ukrainian Crisis 201 Inessa Baban 12 Hybrid or Not: Deterring Russia’s Ways of Warfare in the Baltics - The Case of Estonia 219 Henrik Praks 13 An End-of-Time Utopia: Understanding the Narrative of the Islamic State 243 Jean-Loup Samaan v NATO’s Adaptation to Hybrid Warfare 255 14 NATO’s Hybrid Flanks: Handling Unconventional Warfare in the South and the East 257 Guillaume Lasconjarias and Andreas Jacobs 15 Player at the Sidelines: NATO and the Fight against ISIL 277 Andreas Jacobs and Jean-Loup Samaan 16 NATO’s Very High Readiness Joint Task Force: Can the VJTF give new élan to the NATO Response Force? 295 Jan Abts 17 Nuclear Implications of the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict 309 Karl-Heinz Kamp 18 Conclusion: Is Hybrid Warfare Really New? 321 Keir Giles vi List of Figures, Maps and Images Figures 8.1. Crisis/conflict phases 8.2. Characteristics of modern conflict Maps 10.1. Eastern Ukraine’s energy infrastructure map 11.1. The Republic of Moldova’s Transnistrian region 12.1. Map of the Caliphate according to Islamic State militants Images 13.1. Imaginary view of the final battle, according to Islamic State 13.2. Cover of the Islamic State propaganda magazine, Dabiq vii Contributors Jan Abts, Colonel in the Belgian Army, serves as faculty advisor at the NATO Defence College. He holds master degrees in Political, Social and Military Sciences from the Belgian Royal Military Academy and the Free University Brussels. Prior to his current assignment he served in various positions at the strategic level in SHAPE, at NATO Headquarters, and in the Belgian Defence Staff. He served as a staff officer in the 3rd (U.S.) Infantry Division and was the first commanding officer of the Belgian ISTAR Battalion. Inessa Baban is a former NDC Research Fellow. She worked as a postdoctoral fellow at the Institute for Strategic Research at the French Military Academy and as an external consultant at the Joint Center for concepts, doctrines and experimentations (French Ministry of Defense). She holds a PhD in Political Geography from the Paris-Sorbonne University. During her PhD studies she was a Visiting Research Fellow at the Centre for Strategic Studies under the president of Azerbaijan and worked as contractor at the United Nations Development Program-Baku Office. Stéfanie Babst is Head of the Strategic Analysis Capability section supporting the NATO Secretary General and the Chairman of NATO Military Committee in Brussels. She leads a team that advises the two most senior leaders of the transatlantic Alliance on strategic and global security challenges and risks to NATO and provides them with policy recommendations on how the Alliance and its members could prepare for and respond to them. Prior to joining NATO’s Public Diplomacy Division in 1999, Dr. Babst represented Germany as delegate of the OSCE Election Monitoring Mission in Moscow and Rostov. She holds a master’s degree from Kiel University and a PhD from Harvard. viii Major General Janusz Bojarski is Commandant of the NATO Defense College in Rome. He began his military career as a signals officer in the Polish Air Force. He served as the Assistant Defence, Military, Naval and Air Attaché to the Polish Embassy in Paris, and as the Defence and Air Attaché to the Polish Embassy in Washington D.C. He was subsequently Director of the Personnel Department of the Polish MOD, and Military Representative of Poland to NATO and the EU. Major General Bojarski holds a masters degree in National Resource Strategy from the U.S. National Defense University, and a degree in Pedagogy from the Warsaw Military Academy. He has received numerous honours and awards. General Philip M. Breedlove is Commander, Supreme Allied Command, Europe, SHAPE, Belgium and U.S. European Command, Stuttgart, Germany. General Breedlove has been assigned to numerous operational, command and staff positions, and has completed nine overseas tours, including two remote tours. He has commanded a fighter squadron, an operations group, three fighter wings, and a numbered air force. Additionally, he has served as Vice Chief of Staff of the U.S. Air Force; Operations Officer in the Pacific Command Division on the Joint Staff; Executive Officer to the Commander of Headquarters Air Combat Command; Senior Military Assistant to the Secretary of the Air Force; Vice Director for Strategic Plans and Policy on the Joint Staff; Commander, U.S. Air Forces in Europe; Commander, U.S. Air Forces Africa; Commander, Air Component Command, Ramstein; and Director, Joint Air Power Competence Centre, Kalkar, Germany. He is a command pilot with over 3,500 flying hours, and holds masters degrees from Arizona State University and the U.S. National War College. Roger McDermott is a Senior Fellow in Eurasian Military Studies at the Jamestown Foundation based in Washington, DC; Senior International Fellow at the Foreign Military Studies Office, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas; and an Affiliated Senior Analyst at the Danish Institute for International Studies in Copenhagen. He is a specialist in Russian and Central Asian defence and security and publishes widely in both academic journals and articles tailored toward the policy community. ix Hall Gardner is Professor and Chair of the Department of International and Comparative Politics at the American University of Paris. His books include: Crimea, Global Rivalry, and the Vengeance of History (2015); The Failure to Prevent World War I (2015); NATO Expansion and U.S. Strategy in Asia (2013); and The Ashgate Research Companion to War(2012). He participated in Track II diplomacy with the East-West Institute after the 2008 Georgia-Russia war and with the Geneva Center for Security Policy in 2015 on Indo-Pacific disputes. He is a member of the World Association of International Studies (WAIS) founded at Stanford University. Keir Giles is an Associate Fellow of Chatham House’s International Security Department and Russia and Eurasia Programme.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Minsk II a Fragile Ceasefire
    Briefing 16 July 2015 Ukraine: Follow-up of Minsk II A fragile ceasefire SUMMARY Four months after leaders from France, Germany, Ukraine and Russia reached a 13-point 'Package of measures for the implementation of the Minsk agreements' ('Minsk II') on 12 February 2015, the ceasefire is crumbling. The pressure on Kyiv to contribute to a de-escalation and comply with Minsk II continues to grow. While Moscow still denies accusations that there are Russian soldiers in eastern Ukraine, Russian President Vladimir Putin publicly admitted in March 2015 to having invaded Crimea. There is mounting evidence that Moscow continues to play an active military role in eastern Ukraine. The multidimensional conflict is eroding the country's stability on all fronts. While the situation on both the military and the economic front is acute, the country is under pressure to conduct wide-reaching reforms to meet its international obligations. In addition, Russia is challenging Ukraine's identity as a sovereign nation state with a wide range of disinformation tools. Against this backdrop, the international community and the EU are under increasing pressure to react. In the following pages, the current status of the Minsk II agreement is assessed and other recent key developments in Ukraine and beyond examined. This briefing brings up to date that of 16 March 2015, 'Ukraine after Minsk II: the next level – Hybrid responses to hybrid threats?'. In this briefing: • Minsk II – still standing on the ground? • Security-related implications of the crisis • Russian disinformation
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia
    Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia Niklas Nilsson SILK ROAD PAPER January 2018 Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia Niklas Nilsson © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center American Foreign Policy Council, 509 C St NE, Washington D.C. Institute for Security and Development Policy, V. Finnbodavägen 2, Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden www.silkroadstudies.org “Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia” is a Silk Road Paper published by the Central Asia- Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program, Joint Center. The Silk Road Papers Series is the Occasional Paper series of the Joint Center, and addresses topical and timely subjects. The Joint Center is a transatlantic independent and non-profit research and policy center. It has offices in Washington and Stockholm and is affiliated with the American Foreign Policy Council and the Institute for Security and Development Policy. It is the first institution of its kind in Europe and North America, and is firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. The Joint Center is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development in the region. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion regarding the region. The opinions and conclusions expressed in this study are those of
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Hybrid Warfare
    Research Paper Research Division – NATO Defense College, Rome – No. 105 – November 2014 Russia’s Hybrid Warfare Waging War below the Radar of Traditional Collective Defence by H. Reisinger and A. Golts1 “You can’t modernize a large country with a small war” Karl Schlögel The Research Division (RD) of the NATO De- fense College provides NATO’s senior leaders with “Ukraine is not even a state!” Putin reportedly advised former US President sound and timely analyses and recommendations on current issues of particular concern for the Al- George W. Bush during the 2008 NATO Summit in Bucharest. In 2014 this liance. Papers produced by the Research Division perception became reality. Russian behaviour during the current Ukraine convey NATO’s positions to the wider audience of the international strategic community and con- crisis was based on the traditional Russian idea of a “sphere of influence” and tribute to strengthening the Transatlantic Link. a special responsibility or, stated more bluntly, the “right to interfere” with The RD’s civil and military researchers come from countries in its “near abroad”. This perspective is also implied by the equally a variety of disciplines and interests covering a 2 broad spectrum of security-related issues. They misleading term “post-Soviet space.” The successor states of the Soviet conduct research on topics which are of interest to Union are sovereign countries that have developed differently and therefore the political and military decision-making bodies of the Alliance and its member states. no longer have much in common. Some of them are members of the European Union and NATO, while others are desperately trying to achieve The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the this goal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Year in Elections, 2013: the World's Flawed and Failed Contests
    The Year in Elections, 2013: The World's Flawed and Failed Contests The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Norris, Pippa, Richard W. Frank, and Ferran Martinez i Coma. 2014. The Year in Elections 2013: The World's Flawed and Failed Contests. The Electoral Integrity Project. Published Version http://www.electoralintegrityproject.com/ Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11744445 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA THE YEAR IN ELECTIONS, 2013 THE WORLD’S FLAWED AND FAILED CONTESTS Pippa Norris, Richard W. Frank, and Ferran Martínez i Coma February 2014 THE YEAR IN ELECTIONS, 2013 WWW. ELECTORALINTEGRITYPROJECT.COM The Electoral Integrity Project Department of Government and International Relations Merewether Building, HO4 University of Sydney, NSW 2006 Phone: +61(2) 9351 6041 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.electoralintegrityproject.com Copyright © Pippa Norris, Ferran Martínez i Coma, and Richard W. Frank 2014. All rights reserved. Photo credits Cover photo: ‘Ballot for national election.’ by Daniel Littlewood, http://www.flickr.com/photos/daniellittlewood/413339945. Licence at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0. Page 6 and 18: ‘Ballot sections are separated for counting.’ by Brittany Danisch, http://www.flickr.com/photos/bdanisch/6084970163/ Licence at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0. Page 8: ‘Women in Pakistan wait to vote’ by DFID - UK Department for International Development, http://www.flickr.com/photos/dfid/8735821208/ Licence at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Enforcement of Court Decisions
    01 July – 30 September 2020 QUARTERLY REPORT REPORT FOCUS: NON-ENFORCEMENT OF COURT DECISIONS THE BOC IS FUNDED through the Multi-donor Account for Ukraine set up at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) in 2014. The donors of the Multi-donor Account for Ukraine include: the European the Netherlands Union Denmark Norway Finland Poland France Sweden Germany Switzerland Italy the United Kingdom Japan the United States 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword of the Business Ombudsman 04 Q3 2020 at a glance 06 1. COMPLAINTS TRENDS 08 1.1. Volume and nature of complaints received 08 1.2. Timelines of the preliminary review of complaints 13 1.3. Number of investigations conducted and grounds for dismissing complaints 13 1.4. Timelines of conducting investigations 15 1.5. State bodies subject to the most complaints 16 1.6. Geographical distribution of complaints received 18 1.7. Complainants’ portrait 19 1.8. Report focus: non-enforcement of court decisions 22 1.9. Feedback 30 2. SUMMARY OF KEY MATTERS AND FOLLOW-UP OF RECOMMENDATIONS 32 2.1. Information on closed cases and recommendations provided 32 2.2. Systemic issues identified and solved 38 2.3. Summary of important investigations 40 3. COOPERATION WITH STAKEHOLDERS 68 3.1. The status of the draft law #3607 “On the Business Ombudsman Institution in Ukraine” 68 3.2. Cooperation with state bodies 71 3.3. Regional webinars with the Ministry for Development of Economy, Trade and Agriculture 72 3.4. Knowledge webinars with ACC and UNBA 73 3.5. Public outreach and communications 75 The BOC and the Council are used interchangeably throughout the text to refer to the Business Ombudsman Council.
    [Show full text]
  • The EU and Belarus – a Relationship with Reservations Dr
    BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION EDITED BY DR. HANS-GEORG WIECK AND STEPHAN MALERIUS VILNIUS 2011 UDK 327(476+4) Be-131 BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION Authors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Dr. Vitali Silitski, Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann, Andrei Yahorau, Dr. Svetlana Matskevich, Valeri Fadeev, Dr. Andrei Kazakevich, Dr. Mikhail Pastukhou, Leonid Kalitenya, Alexander Chubrik Editors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Stephan Malerius This is a joint publication of the Centre for European Studies and the Konrad- Adenauer-Stiftung. This publication has received funding from the European Parliament. Sole responsibility for facts or opinions expressed in this publication rests with the authors. The Centre for European Studies, the Konrad-Adenauer- Stiftung and the European Parliament assume no responsibility either for the information contained in the publication or its subsequent use. ISBN 978-609-95320-1-1 © 2011, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., Sankt Augustin / Berlin © Front cover photo: Jan Brykczynski CONTENTS 5 | Consultancy PROJECT: BELARUS AND THE EU Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck 13 | BELARUS IN AN INTERnational CONTEXT Dr. Vitali Silitski 22 | THE EU and BELARUS – A Relationship WITH RESERvations Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann 34 | CIVIL SOCIETY: AN analysis OF THE situation AND diRECTIONS FOR REFORM Andrei Yahorau 53 | Education IN BELARUS: REFORM AND COOPERation WITH THE EU Dr. Svetlana Matskevich 70 | State bodies, CONSTITUTIONAL REALITY AND FORMS OF RULE Valeri Fadeev 79 | JudiciaRY AND law
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Airborne Troops Descend
    fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/oewatch Vol. 4 Issue #4 April 2014 Foreign Military Studies Office OE WATCH FOREIGN NEWS & PERSPECTIVES OF THE OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT LAND POWER RUSSIA AFRICA 4 A Glimpse of the Russian Rapid Reaction Force 39 U.S. Military Assistance Pays Off in Africa: In the Crimea? Somali Army and AMISOM Liberate Strategic Town 6 Russian Military in Crimea: 40 French Expeditionary Forces and African Armies Convoys from the North Caucasus and Land Mines Turning the Tide Against Extremists 8 Ukraine Crisis Reverberates in Russia: 41 Nigerian Special Forces Strike Crucial Blow the Caucasus Connection to Boko Haram Land Operation 10 Russian Airborne Troops Descend 42 Nigeria: Disbanding of Joint Task Force was a 12 Baltic View of Crimea Mistake 14 Polite Green Men in Crimea-Origins 43 Nigeria Ramps up Military Production Capabilities 15 Russia’s Use of Strategic Landpower during the Crimean Crisis: the Media LATIN AMERICA 17 Russian Military Mulls Further Organizational 45 War Imagined between Colombia and Venezuela Reforms 47 Colombian Land-Power 23 Much Ado about Russian SOCOM 25 Russian Federation Ground Forces and UAVs INDO-PACIFIC ASIA 49 Regional Ground Forces Exercise Programs TURKEY in the Indo-Pacific on the Rise 27 A Look at the Turkish Land Forces Command’s Modernization Efforts CHINA 28 Weapons Systems of the Turkish Land 52 Chinese Special Operations – Viewed with Forces’ Maneuver Units Increasing Importance 29 Turkish Land Forces Command’s Air 54 The Mission, Motives and Morale of China’s Defense and Military Aircraft
    [Show full text]
  • Info Document on Nato Summit
    214 SESA 18 E Original: English Annual Session KEY OUTCOMES OF THE SUMMIT OF NATO HEADS OF STATE AND GOVERNMENT HELD IN BRUSSELS, BELGIUM, ON 11-12 JULY 2018 Information document www.nato-pa.int October 2018 214 SESA 18 E TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 II. NATO’S MISSION & VALUES .............................................................................. 2 III. THREAT ENVIRONMENT.................................................................................... 3 IV. PRIORITIES ......................................................................................................... 3 A. BURDEN SHARING ............................................................................................. 3 B. DETERRENCE AND COLLECTIVE DEFENCE, AND RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA ................................................................................................................ 7 1. Relations with Russia ........................................................................................... 7 2. Collective Defence and Deterrence ...................................................................... 7 C. PROJECTING STABILITY AND COMBATTING TERRORISM .......................... 10 D. MODERNISING THE ALLIANCE ....................................................................... 11 E. NATO-EU COOPERATION ................................................................................ 12 V. 70TH ANNIVERSARY AND 2019 .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Kremlin's Irregular Army: Ukrainian Separatist Order of Battle
    THE KREMLIN’S IRREGULARY ARMY: UKRAINIAN SEPARATIST ORDER OF BATTLE | FRANKLIN HOLCOMB | AUGUST 2017 Franklin Holcomb September 2017 RUSSIA AND UKRAINE SECURITY REPORT 3 THE KREMLIN’S IRREGULAR ARMY: UKRAINIAN SEPARATIST ORDER OF BATTLE WWW.UNDERSTANDINGWAR.ORG 1 Cover: A Pro-Russian separatist sits at his position at Savur-Mohyla, a hill east of the city of Donetsk, August 28, 2014. REUTERS/Maxim Shemetov. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing or from the publisher. ©2017 by the Institute for the Study of War. Published in 2017 in the United States of America by the Instittue for the Study of War. 1400 16th Street NW, Suite 515 | Washington, DC 20036 understandingwar.org 2 Franklin Holcomb The Kremlin’s Irregular Army: Ukrainian Separatist Order of Battle ABOUT THE AUTHOR Franklin Holcomb is a Russia and Ukraine Research Analyst at the Institute for the Study of War where he focuses on the war in Ukraine, Ukrainian politics, and Russian foreign policy in Eastern Europe. His current research focuses on studying the development of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the Russian-backed separatist formations operating in Eastern Ukraine, as well as analyzing Russian political and military activity in Moldova, the Baltic, and the Balkans. Mr. Holcomb is the author of “The Order of Battle of the Ukrainian Armed Forces: A Key Component in European Security,” “Moldova Update: Kremlin Will Likely Seek to Realign Chisinau”, “Ukraine Update: Russia’s Aggressive Subversion of Ukraine,” as well as ISW’s other monthly updates on the political and military situation in Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine: White Book 2005
    Ministry of Defence of Ukraine WHITE BOOK 2005 DEFENCE POLICY OF UKRAINE KYIV • 2006 The White Book 2005: Defence Policy of Ukraine annual publication was prepared by a group of authors from the Ministry of Defence and the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Translation: Rozmai Media Center Editors: Vadim KASTELLI, James GREENE, David JONES, Victor BALABIN, Oleksiy MELNIK, Mykola SUNGUROVSKIY, Oleg CHERNYSHOV The White Book is published annually according to the Law of Ukraine “On Democratic Civilian Control over Military Organisation and Law Enforcement Agencies of the State”, with the aim to regularly inform the society on activities of the Armed Forces of Ukraine as well as the defence policy of the State, and its challenges and solutions. This first publication of The White Book 2005: Defence Policy of Ukraine is dedicated to challenges in reform and development of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The publication highlights current state of the Armed Forces and priority areas for further military development, stipulated in the new State Programme of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Development for 2006-2011. The publication may be found useful for civilian and military experts in the fields of military development, defence and security policy, as well as for journalists, teachers and students of specialised educational institutions and to all interested in the state and development of the defence policy of Ukraine. The White Book is published with financial support from the Embassies of Great Britain, USA and NATO’s Centre of Information and Documentation. ISBN 966-7272-75-3 © Zapovit Publishing house, 2006 © Layout & design: Alexandr MOSKALENKO, 2006 WHITE BOOK n 2005 3 THE PRESIDENT OF UKRAINE, SUPREME COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF OF THE ARMED FORCES OF UKRAINE PREFACE TO THE INTERNATIONAL EDITION OF THE UKRAINIAN WHITE BOOK ON DEFENCE POLICY The Ukrainian Armed Forces have a long and proud tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Paper Research Division – NATO Defense College, Rome – No
    Research Paper Research Division – NATO Defense College, Rome – No. 122 – December 2015 The Transnistrian Conflict in the Context of the Ukrainian Crisis by Inessa Baban1 Until recently, relatively little was known about the Transnistrian conflict that has been undermining the territorial integrity and sovereignty of the Republic of Moldova since the collapse of the Soviet Union. The The Research Division (RD) of the NATO De- fense College provides NATO’s senior leaders with waves of enlargement towards the East of NATO and the European sound and timely analyses and recommendations on current issues of particular concern for the Al- Union drew attention to Transnistria, which has been seen as one of the liance. Papers produced by the Research Division convey NATO’s positions to the wider audience “frozen conflict zones” in the post-Soviet area alongside Abkhazia, South of the international strategic community and con- tribute to strengthening the Transatlantic Link. Ossetia and Nagorno-Karabakh. However, the Transnistrian issue has The RD’s civil and military researchers come from not been perceived as a serious threat to Euro-Atlantic security because a variety of disciplines and interests covering a broad spectrum of security-related issues. They no outbreaks of large-scale hostilities or human casualties have been conduct research on topics which are of interest to the political and military decision-making bodies reported in the region since the 1990s. Beyond a few small incidents in of the Alliance and its member states. the demilitarized zone, the 1992 ceasefire has been respected for more The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the than two decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF in New Window
    Research Paper Research Division – NATO Defense College, Rome – No. 121 – November 2015 Russia’s Renewed Military Thinking: Non-Linear Warfare and Reflexive Control by Can Kasapoglu1 Introduction: A Renewed Russian Military Thinking Since the Russo – Georgian War in 2008, the Russian Armed Forces’ new way of warfighting has been drawing attention. Especially following the The Research Division (RD) of the NATO De- fense College provides NATO’s senior leaders with Crimean campaign, which ended up with the illegal annexation of the sound and timely analyses and recommendations peninsula in March 2014, and given Moscow’s ongoing open and covert on current issues of particular concern for the Al- liance. Papers produced by the Research Division military activities in Eastern Ukraine and recently in Syria, many experts convey NATO’s positions to the wider audience of the international strategic community and con- started to focus their assessments on what they call Russia’s hybrid, or non- tribute to strengthening the Transatlantic Link. linear, warfare. On the other hand, there are also some voices in the Western The RD’s civil and military researchers come from strategic community advancing the analysis that Moscow’s understanding a variety of disciplines and interests covering a broad spectrum of security-related issues. They of non-linear warfare is simply an “attempt to catch up conceptually to the conduct research on topics which are of interest to the political and military decision-making bodies realities of modern war with which the United States has been grappling for of the Alliance and its member states. 2 over a decade in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere.” The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Indeed, the Russian and the Western understandings of hybrid warfare North Atlantic Treaty Organization or the NATO Defense College.
    [Show full text]