DOCSLIB.ORG

2013 Myanmar ERF Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2013 Myanmar ERF Annual Report Emergency Response Fund Myanmar Photo Credit: OCHA Annual Report 2013 Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs Emergency Response Fund – Myanmar Annual Report 2013 Note from the Humanitarian Coordinator The Emergency Response Fund for Myanmar, NGOs directly. Because these local NGOs are formerly known as the Humanitarian Multi- often the most cost effective, I will continue to Stakeholder Fund, provides me, as Humanitarian support the Fund’s strategy to prioritise local NGOs Coordinator, with a rapid and flexible funding for direct implementation of ERF projects whenever instrument to respond to small scale emergencies possible. and gaps in the core humanitarian response with Looking ahead to 2014, I expect the ERF to grow in timely assistance for the people in need. size, including the number of projects funded, level During 2013, the ERF provided $1.8 million to five of funding provided, and the number of people projects to cover critical gaps in the humanitarian reached with humanitarian assistance. The ERF response that were not being addressed by other will continue implementation of the reforms donors. For example, although the disposal of introduced during 2013, such as the strengthening waste from overflowing latrines in Sittwe IDP camps of the governance mechanisms and needs-based had been highlighted by the WASH cluster as prioritization of projects, and take steps to develop a essential to preventing the spread of disease, no risk management framework to increase the project to dispose of the excreta had received donor transparency and accountability of the Fund. funding. To fill this gap, the ERF provided $472,000 I take this opportunity to extend my sincere to launch a response, and as a result more than 30 appreciation for the generous support provided by per cent of the latrines in Sittwe camps had been Australia, Sweden and the United Kingdom to the emptied and the waste treated by the end of 2013. Emergency Response Fund since 2007. Both the To ensure that the ERF has the resources recipients of humanitarian assistance and our necessary to continue to address this kind of urgent implementing partners benefit greatly from their un-met humanitarian need, the Fund should be cooperation and confidence. I would like to express expanded with additional donor support in 2014. my sincere gratitude to all humanitarian partners for their engagement and continued support. It has In addition to providing timely humanitarian been possible to address urgent humanitarian response, the ERF has built partnerships with civil needs of the people in Myanmar due to the joint society and increased capacity of local and efforts and commitment of all the stakeholders of community organisations through planning and the Myanmar Emergency Response Fund. implementing humanitarian projects. Much of the improved timeliness in the response provided by the ERF can be attributed to the greater participation and involvement of the clusters in the selection and recommendation of projects to be funded. Myanmar NGOs are often the only organisations which provide assistance directly to the people in need, especially in isolated or “hard to reach” areas. Renata Lok-Dessallien Despite this fact, few donors fund the national Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator Cover photos: Several residents of IDP camps in Sittwe, Rakhine State, including a Rakhine family (top) and Muslim children (bottom). (OCHA) Emergency Response Fund – Myanmar Annual Report 2013 Table of Contents NOTE FROM THE HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................................................1 HUMANITARIAN CONTEXT ...................................................................................................................................2 COUNTRY MAP .......................................................................................................................................................3 INFORMATION ON CONTRIBUTIONS ...................................................................................................................4 FUND OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................................................5 RESULTS OF ERF PROJECTS IMPLEMENTED DURING 2013 ........................................................................................6 OVERVIEW OF THE EDUCATION SECTOR ...................................................................................................................6 OVERVIEW OF THE HEALTH SECTOR .........................................................................................................................8 OVERVIEW OF THE LIVELIHOODS (EARLY RECOVERY) SECTOR ..................................................................................9 OVERVIEW OF THE NON-FOOD ITEMS (NFI) SECTOR .............................................................................................. 10 OVERVIEW OF THE WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE (WASH) SECTOR ............................................................... 10 PROJECT MONITORING ..................................................................................................................................... 12 MAINSTREAMING GENDER CONSIDERATION ................................................................................................ 13 RISK MANAGEMENT ........................................................................................................................................... 14 ACHIEVEMENTS AND CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................ 15 ANNEX I: GLOSSARY .......................................................................................................................................... 18 ANNEX II: ADVISORY BOARD MEMBERSHIP (AS AT END 2013) .................................................................. 19 ANNEX III: PROJECTS FUNDED IN 2013 ........................................................................................................... 20 ANNEX IV: PROJECTS IMPLEMENTED DURING 2013 .................................................................................... 21 Emergency Response Fund – Myanmar Annual Report 2013 Executive Summary The Myanmar Emergency Response Fund (ERF) WASH sector and Education sector coordinators, continues to play an important role in providing the majority of proposals received and 81 per cent essential humanitarian assistance to vulnerable of funding allocated was to these two sectors. people affected by conflict in Myanmar. During Activities in the Livelihoods and NFI sectors were 2013, the ERF received US$762,079 in new also supported during 2013. Of the five projects contributions and allocated $1.78 million to five approved in 2013, two projects were for Kachin and projects to cover critical gaps in the overall three for Rakhine. humanitarian response in Kachin and Rakhine The programmatic results shown in this 2013 ERF States. The total number of beneficiaries from ERF- annual report come from five projects which were funded projects implemented during 2013 was implemented during 2013, which are not all of the approximately 116,000. same projects that were funded during 2013. One The ERF has become an important tool of the project which was funded at the end of 2012 was Humanitarian Coordinator (HC) to provide urgent implemented only in 2013, and one project funded response to unmet humanitarian needs. Myanmar at the end of 2013 will be implemented only in 2014. remains vulnerable to a wide range of crises, both The total cost of the five projects reporting the natural and man-made which cause large-scale results included in this report was $2.0 million. human suffering, including the displacement of hundreds of thousands of people. Inter-communal The HMSF becomes an ERF violence in Rakhine State in 2012 resulted in the In 2007, the HC established a small fund to provide displacement of 140,000 people across Rakhine, assistance to vulnerable people living in the “hard to and additional needs of other conflicted affected reach” areas outside of Government control. This people. In Kachin, the conflict between armed Fund, known as the Humanitarian Multi-Stakeholder groups and the Myanmar Government has resulted Fund (HMSF), was one of the only channels that in the continued displacement of approximately provided assistance to these isolated populations, 100,000 IDPs in camps or with host families. as UN agencies and international non-governmental organisations (NGOs) were not able to access Donor support for the ERF these “hard to reach” areas. Between 2007 and 2013, the ERF received $7.9 million Due to the politically sensitive operational in contributions from three donors: Australia, Sweden, environment, the HMSF remained small, funding and the United Kingdom. Largely due to the Fund’s low only five projects during the first four years of the profile, the ERF has not received additional consistent Fund's existence. or predictable donor support during these years. In 2013, the HMSF expanded to Rakhine, and In 2013, the ERF received one contribution of began to fund more "traditional" ERF-type $762,079 from Sweden. All allocations made to emergency humanitarian assistance projects, in projects during the year came from the $2.2 million areas that were not "hard to reach." To formalise carried over from 2012. To remain a viable
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Acknowledgments
    FACTORS AFFECTING COMMERCIALIZATION OF THE RURAL LIVESTOCK SECTOR Acknowledgments Thisresearch study was led by U Kyaw Khine & Associates with the assistance of the field survey team of the FSWG members organizations. The research team would like to express sincere thanks to Dr Ohnmar Khaing (FSWG Coordinator), Dr. Min Ko Ko Maung, (Deputy Coordinator), and Mr. Thijs Wissink (Programme Advisor) for their kind and effective support for the research. The team is especially grateful to Daw Yi Yi Cho (M&E Officer) for providing logistical and technical support along with study design, data collection, analysis, and report writing. Finally, this research would not have been possible without the valuable participation and knowledge imparted by all the respondents from the villages of Pauktaw and Taungup Townships and focus group discussion (FGD) participants. The research team would like to acknowledge the experts and professors from respective institutions concerned with livestock who willingly agreed to take part in the FGDs. We are greatly indebted to them. 1 FACTORS AFFECTING COMMERCIALIZATION OF THE RURAL LIVESTOCK SECTOR Ensure adequate financial and human resources to village volunteers for veterinary extension services to cover all rural areas Upgrade local pig breeds with improved variety for better genetic performance in rural livestock production Attract private sector investment to finance all livestock support infrastructure, such as cold chain, cold storage, animal feed mills, veterinary drugs, and meat and
    [Show full text]
  • Sector Map UNICEF Location of Protection Actors Across General
    Myanmar Information Management Unit Location/Presence of Protection Actors Across General Protection Sector 96°0'E 97°0'E 98°0'E Nanyun BHUTAN INDIA CHINA Ü LAOS Tsawlaw Sumprabum THAILAND Tanai Kachin Hkamti Injangyang 26°0'N 26°0'N Chipwi KBC camp (! Chipwi Hpakant Myitkyina Hpare Hkyer - BP6 Sai Nai Baptish Church, Maw Shan Vil., Seki Mu (! (! Man Hkring Baptist Church 5 Ward Baptist Church(lon Khin) Baptist Church, Naung Hmee VT Njang Dung Baptist Church Baptist Church, Hmaw Si Sar(Lon Khin) 5 Ward RC Church(lon Khin) Shatapru Sut Ngai Tawng (! Lisu Baptist Church, Maw Wan Ward (!(! Dhama Rakhita, Nyein Chan Tar Yar Ward(Lon Khin) Tat Kone Emanuel Church (!(! (! Tat Kone Baptist Church AG Church, Maw Wan AG Church, Hmaw Si Sa (!(! (! (! (! Tat Kone COC Baptist / Tat Kone Htoi San Pan Wa (! Nam Ma Phyit, COC (! Nga Pyaw Taw Baptist Nursery School (!(! Nant Ma Hpit Catholic Church Tat Kone San Pya Baptist Church Chin Church, Seik Mu (!(! Tat Kone Galile Baptist Church Pa Dauk Myaing(Pa La Na) Maw Wan, Mu-yin Baptist Church Nan Kway St. John Catholic Church Shwe Zet Baptist Church Lisu Baptist Church, Maw Shan Vil,. Seik Mu Hmaw Wan, Anglican Hlaing Naung Baptist (! Jan Mai Kawng Baptist Church Shatapru Thida Aye Baptist Church Yumar Baptist Church Jan Mai Kawng Catholic Church (! Maina AG Church Ward 2 Sai Taung Baptist Church, Seik Mu Du Kahtawng Qtr. 5 Maina Catholic Church (St. Joseph) Rawan Baptist Church, Maw Shan Vil., Seik Mu Du Kahtawng Qtr. 4 (! Maina KBC (Bawng Ring) (! Shing Jai (!(! (! (! (! Myay Myint Baptist Church (! (! (! (!(! Maina Lawang Baptist Church (!(!(! (! (!(! Maw Hpawng Hka Nan Baptist Church (!.! Du Kahtawng Qtr.
    [Show full text]
  • Rakhine State, Myanmar
    World Food Programme S P E C I A L R E P O R T THE 2018 FAO/WFP AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SECURITY MISSION TO RAKHINE STATE, MYANMAR 12 July 2019 Photographs: ©FAO/F. Del Re/L. Castaldi and ©WFP/K. Swe. This report has been prepared by Monika Tothova and Luigi Castaldi (FAO) and Yvonne Forsen, Marco Principi and Sasha Guyetsky (WFP) under the responsibility of the FAO and WFP secretariats with information from official and other sources. Since conditions may change rapidly, please contact the undersigned for further information if required. Mario Zappacosta Siemon Hollema Senior Economist, EST-GIEWS Senior Programme Policy Officer Trade and Markets Division, FAO Regional Bureau for Asia and the Pacific, WFP E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Please note that this Special Report is also available on the Internet as part of the FAO World Wide Web www.fao.org Please note that this Special Report is also available on the Internet as part of the FAO World Wide Web www.fao.org at the following URL address: http://www.fao.org/giews/ The Global Information and Early Warning System on Food and Agriculture (GIEWS) has set up a mailing list to disseminate its reports. To subscribe, submit the Registration Form on the following link: http://newsletters.fao.org/k/Fao/trade_and_markets_english_giews_world S P E C I A L R E P O R T THE 2018 FAO/WFP AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SECURITY MISSION TO RAKHINE STATE, MYANMAR 12 July 2019 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME Rome, 2019 Required citation: FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 3 Public Map of Rakhine State
    ICC-01/19-7-Anx3 04-07-2019 1/2 RH PT Annex 3 Public Map of Rakhine State (Source: Myanmar Information Management Unit) http://themimu.info/sites/themimu.info/files/documents/State_Map_D istrict_Rakhine_MIMU764v04_23Oct2017_A4.pdf ICC-01/19-7-Anx3 04-07-2019 2/2 RH PT Myanmar Information Management Unit District Map - Rakhine State 92° EBANGLADESH 93° E 94° E 95° E Pauk !( Kyaukhtu INDIA Mindat Pakokku Paletwa CHINA Maungdaw !( Samee Ü Taungpyoletwea Nyaung-U !( Kanpetlet Ngathayouk CHIN STATE Saw Bagan !( Buthidaung !( Maungdaw District 21° N THAILAND 21° N SeikphyuChauk Buthidaung Kyauktaw Kyauktaw Kyaukpadaung Maungdaw Mrauk-U Salin Rathedaung Mrauk-U Minbya Rathedaung Ponnagyun Mrauk-U District Sidoktaya Yenangyaung Minbya Pwintbyu Sittwe DistrictPonnagyun Pauktaw Sittwe Saku !( Minbu Pauktaw .! Ngape .! Sittwe Myebon Ann Magway Myebon 20° N RAKHINE STATE Minhla 20° N Ann MAGWAY REGION Sinbaungwe Kyaukpyu District Kyaukpyu Ma-Ei Kyaukpyu !( Mindon Ramree Toungup Ramree Kamma 19° N 19° N Bay of Bengal Munaung Toungup Munaung Padaung Thandwe District BAGO REGION Thandwe Thandwe Kyangin Legend .! State/Region Capital Main Town !( Other Town Kyeintali !( 18° N Coast Line 18° N Map ID: MIMU764v04 Township Boundary Creation Date: 23 October 2017.A4 State/Region Boundary Projection/Datum: Geographic/WGS84 International Boundary Data Sources: MIMU Gwa Base Map: MIMU Road Boundaries: MIMU/WFP Kyaukpyu Place Name: Ministry of Home Affairs (GAD) Gwa translated by MIMU Maungdaw Mrauk-U Email: [email protected] Website: www.themimu.info Sittwe Ngathaingchaung Copyright © Myanmar Information Management Unit Kilometers !( Thandwe 2017. May be used free of charge with attribution. 0 15 30 60 Yegyi 92° E 93° E 94° E 95° E Disclaimer: The names shown and the boundaries used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations..
    [Show full text]
  • Demographic Characteristic S and Road Network on the Spread of Coronavirus Pandemic in Rakhine State
    THE IMPACT OF DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS AND ROAD NETWORK ON THE SPREAD OF CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC IN RAKHINE STATE: USING GEOSPATIAL TECHNIQUES Mu Mu Than (1), Khin Mar Yee (2), Tin Tin Mya (3), Thida Win (4) 1 Sittway University, Rakhine State, Myanmar 2 Myeik University, Tanintharyi Region, Myanmar 3 Pathein University, Ayeyarwady Region, Myanmar 4 East Yangon University, Yangon Region, Myanmar [email protected] KEY WORDS: connectivity, demographic characteristics, confirmed cases, factor 1. INTRODUCTION analysis, interaction Rakhine State has 5 districts in which 17 ABSTRACT: Demographic characteristics townships and 3sub-townships are included. give communities information for the past, Percentage of urban population is 17%. It has present and future plan and services. more rural nature. Total number of population Demographic data and connectivity of road in Rakhine State is 3,188,807 (2014 Census). It has an area of 36,778.1 Km2. Population network impact how far people travel and 2 what they do. The spread of COVID-19 cases density is 86.7 per km . It faces the Bay of in the state deals with these data. Bengal on the west, Bangladesh in the northwest and the India in the north. In the In the 31st August 2020 COVID-19 east it is bordered by state and regions of the confirmed cases across the state had risen to country (Figure 1). Waterway is important to 350 cases. This is more than that of Yangon the transportation of people and goods in the Region. The researchers are interested in the middle and northern part of the states to reasons for that.
    [Show full text]
  • Rakhine Humanitarian Response February 2013
    GBV AoR RRT_Rakhine Humanitarian Response_February 2013 Rapid Assessment Protection situation of Women and Girls --Rakhine Humanitarian Response GBV is a life-threatening protection issue primarily affecting women and children. All humanitarian actors have a responsibility to take action from the earliest stages of an emergency to prevent GBV and provide appropriate assistance to survivors. --IASC Guidelines for Gender-Based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Settings, 2005-- 1. Objective The main objective of this rapid assessment is to identify the protection needs of women and girls living in the IDP camps, although it also tried to explore further on protection issues related to men and boys, but due to limitations in time and source of information, it focuses on risks and threats identified and faced by women. The assessment was lead by the GBV AoR Advisor1 on mission to Myanmar, in collaboration with UNFPA, UNHCR and DRC. It is based mainly on information gathered through focus group discussions (FGDs) with IDP women, direct observations from the interviewers, and information collected from key service providers. Due to the available logistical support, the information was collected primarily from the Sittwe, Pauktaw and Myebon camps. A total of 18 FGDs were conducted in 11 locations, including Muslim IDPs, Rakhine IDPs and the Muslim host community2. Other locations will be assessed and further findings will be included in future reports. This report does not provide information on the current prevalence of gender based violence (GBV) in the affected areas, but it assesses risks and threats, and identifies entry points for programming on GBV prevention and response.
    [Show full text]
  • MYANMAR, RAKHINE STATE: COVID-19 Situation Report No
    MYANMAR, RAKHINE STATE: COVID-19 Situation Report No. 08 1 September 2020 This report, which focuses on the recent surge in COVID-19 cases in Rakhine, is produced by OCHA Myanmar covering the period of 10 to 31 August, in collaboration with Inter-Cluster Coordination Group and wider humanitarian partners. The next report will be issued on or around 18 September. HIGHLIGHTS • A total of 393 locally transmitted cases have been reported across Rakhine between 16 August and 1 September, bringing to 409 the number of cases in 16 townships since 18 May. Across the country, 887 cases, six fatalities and 354 recoveries have been reported. • The recent surge in local transmission includes COVID-19 positive cases among the personnel of the United Nations agencies and international non-governmental organizations (INGO). • No cases have been reported in camps or sites for internally displaced people (IDPs) as of 31 August, while displaced persons who had been in contact with COVID-19 confirmed cases were placed in quarantine and tested. • Sittwe General Hospital, where most COVID-19 confirmed cases are being treated, remains the primary treatment facility for Rakhine. Efforts to increase treatment capacities continue. • The Rakhine State Government has introduced various COVID-19 measures since 16 August, including a state-wide “stay-at-home” order and other measures aimed at preventing the local transmission. • Humanitarian actors are assessing the impact of the recently introduced COVID-19 measures on operations, including COVID-19 preparedness and response activities. SITUATION OVERVIEW 409 16 393 887 157K Cases in Rakhine Townships Locally transmitted Cases countrywide Total tests conducted countrywide SURGE IN LOCAL TRANSMISSION: Since 16 August, when the Ministry of Health and Sports (MoHS) confirmed a new COVID-19 case in Sittwe - the first case of local transmission reported in almost a month country-wide - the number of locally transmitted cases has continued to increase in Rakhine State.
    [Show full text]
  • MYANMAR: IDP Sites in Rakhine State (April 2015) Kanpetlet
    MYANMAR: IDP Sites in Rakhine State (April 2015) Kanpetlet Mu Hti Pa Da Kar Ywar Thit Sar KaingKyaw U Let Hpweit Kya Tin May Done Ku Lar Kyauk Twe ChaungKyaung Taung Kyun Taung Wet Kyein CHINA Thea Chaung Hpar Ri Min Gyi (Ku Lar) Kyauk See Thea Chaung Maw La Bi Min Gyi (Tu Lar Tu Li) Wet Kyein (Myo) Nan Tha Yway San Kar Pin Yin (Myo) Pe Tha Htu Leik Ya Zone Karr Yar Kyet Kyein Pe Lun Kha Mway Pauk Kyat Wa Leik Ya (South) Oe Hpyu (Thet + Myo)Oh Byu Sa Hone Kha Mway San Kar Pin Yin Saung Paing Nyar Hmaing Sa Ri Kyun Pauk Sin Oe Bo Bar Kyway Chaung RakhineKyway Chaung Ku Lar Sin Ma U Kaing Ree Dar Mee Wa Kyun Pauk Pyu Su Kyun Pauk Ku Lar Doe Tan Sin Hpyu Taung Done Paik Sa Hone Gyin Khar Say Ah Lel Baw Da Li Baw Da Li (2) Nga/Hta Yan Mon Than Pyin Myo Mi ChaungKyein Chaung Goke Pi Pauk Kyat CHINA Kyun Pauk Ywar Haung Hpaw Ti Kaung In Chaung Pan Kone Ma Seik Ta Ra Kyauk Tan Myaw Chaung Myar Zin INDIA Nga Thaing ChaungThan Pu Yar BUTHIDAUNG Mun Htaunt Kyun Gaung Sin Thay Pyin Mi Kyaung Tet Ba Ho Pyin Ywar Thit Taung Yin Ah Htet Thet Tin Yae Myet Ba Ho Pyin Ywar Haung Baw Di Kaing Chaung Chay Than Hmyar Ah Htet Pyu Ma Sa Bai Kone San Kar Taung Pyaung Pyit Doe Tan Saung Tu Than Hmyar Kun Zwe Zee Hton RakhineTaung Gyi Yin Thein Taung Auk Thet Tin Ngar Sar Kyu Yin Ma Zee Hton Pi Ywet RakhineYae Chan Myo Thit Pan Be Chaung Ku Lar Pein Hne Chaung Ku Lar Chaung Kyin Gyi Laung Shey Nyaung Pin Hla Nga Khu Ya Leik Aing Maung Hnit Ma Kyein Chaung Ku Lar Chaung Kywe Ta Ma Thar Si Myo Ah Nauk Pyin Sa Par Seik Kat Pa KaungLu Ban Pyin Pauk Taw Pyin Kyar
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar Humanitarian Situation Report #2
    Myanmar Humanitarian Situation Report #2 © UNICEF/2018/Htet Win Arkar SITUATION IN NUMBERS 4 May 2018 Highlights 319,000 During the month of April, increased fighting in Kachin State displaced children in need of humanitarian assistance an estimated 5000 civilians. (37% of total people in need) Access to people in need in conflict-affected areas remains extremely challenging. 863,000 people in need Between 24-26 April, UNICEF delivered 3,601 hygiene kits benefitting (2018 Humanitarian Needs Overview) over 20,600 people in Muslim, Rakhine and Hindu communities in Maungdaw District. UNICEF Myanmar HAC UNICEF is working with interagency colleagues to update the Appeal 2018 preparedness and response planning for the upcoming cyclone season US$ 31,780,000 with a focus on Rakhine State. UNICEF Myanmar received generous funding support from Denmark, Funds Received 2018 Japan and the United States; however, significant funding gap of US$ US$ 7,342,864 19 million remains. Without additional funds, UNICEF will not be able to address the essential needs of children, women and men across parts of Rakhine, Kachin and Shan States. UNICEF’s Response with Partners Funding Status 2018: UNICEF Cluster/Sector Funds received: $7.3m Cluster / UNICEF Total Total Sector Target Results* Results* Carry-forward : Target $5.5m Nutrition: # of children under 5 with SAM admitted to 9,000 347 10,600 751 2018 funding therapeutic care requirement: Health: # children and women $31.8m provided with access to health 135,000 40,107 care services WASH: # people accessing Funding Gap: 117,570 44,928 508,978 184,493 sufficient water $19m Child Protection: # children 246,950 129,420 274,475 131,895 with access to PSS Education: # children accessing Note: Carry forward funding includes funding for activities in pre-primary/primary learning 37,000 12,482 60,850 35,221 Kachin, Shan and Rakhine as well as $1.5 million for ongoing school reconstruction in response to 2015 flooding in Rakhine.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Restricted
    Rakhine Health Cluster Mobile Clinic Status N N N N ' ' ' ' 0 0 92°30'E 93°0'E 93°30'E 0 92°30'E 93°0'E 93°30'E 0 3 3 3 3 ° ° ° ° 1 1 Bangladesh 1 Bangladesh 1 2 2 July 2018 2 July 2019 2 MAUNGDAW MAUNGDAW TOWNSHIP Paletwa TOWNSHIP Paletwa CHIN STATE CHIN STATE SITTWE TOWNSHIP SITTWE TOWNSHIP BUTHIDAUNG TOWNSHIP N N N N ' ' ' BUTHIDAUNG TOWNSHIP ' 0 0 0 0 ° ° ° ° 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 KYAUKTAW TOWNSHIP KYAUKTAW TOWNSHIP Buthidaung Sittwe Buthidaung Sittwe Maungdaw Kyauktaw Maungdaw Kyauktaw RESTRICTED MRAUK-U TOWNSHIP MRAUK-U TOWNSHIP Mrauk-U DRAFT Mrauk-U RATHEDAUNG RATHEDAUNG PONNAGYUN PONNAGYUN TOWNSHIP RAKHINE STATE TOWNSHIP RAKHINE STATE N TOWNSHIP N N TOWNSHIP N ' ' ' ' 0 0 0 0 3 Rathedaung 3 3 Rathedaung 3 ° ° ° ° 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 Mobile clinics MINBYA TOWNSHIP Mobile clinics MINBYA TOWNSHIP Minbya 274 Ponnagyun Minbya 100 Ponnagyun Government Government 116 PAUKTAW PAUKTAW TOWNSHIP 1 TOWNSHIP Joint ANN TOWNSHIP SITTWE Joint SITTWE ANN TOWNSHIP Pauktaw Pauktaw TOWNSHIP TOWNSHIP 7 6 4 Sittwe Sittwe 1 4 5 Non Government Non Government N N N N ' Myebon ' ' Myebon ' 0 0 0 0 ° ° ° ° 0 81 39 12 0 0 0 2 2 2 54 21 8 2 Legend MYEBON TOWNSHIP MYEBON TOWNSHIP Clinic Provider Type Map ID: MIMU1546v04 Creation Date: 17 September 2019 Government Paper Size: A3 Joint Projection/Datum: Geographic/WGS84 Data Source: Non-Government Health Cluster (Rakhine State) Base map: MIMU Visit frequency per month July 2018 July 2019 Clinics not displayed in the maps because of missing geographic No Township Mobile Vistits/ Mobile Vistits/ < 4 visits coordinates: 9 locations in 2018 and 6 locations in 2019 N N N Clinics Month Clinics Month N ' Place Names: General Administration Department (GAD) and field ' ' ' 0 0 0 0 3 sources.Place names on this product are in line with the general 3 3 3 ° ° ° 1 Sittwe 92 404 56 328 ° 9 4 - 8 visits cartographic practice to reflect the names of such places as 9 9 9 1 KYAUKPYU TOWNSHIP 1 1 2 Buthidaung 64 85 6 8 KYAUKPYU TOWNSHIP 1 designated by the government concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette of FRIDAY, 6Th APRIL, 1951
    39195 1881 SECOND SUPPLEMENT TO The London Gazette OF FRIDAY, 6th APRIL, 1951 Registered as a Newspaper THURSDAY, 12 APRIL, 1951 .The War Office, 1951. OPERATIONS IN BURMA FROM 12th NOVEMBER, 1944, TO 15th AUGUST, 1945 NOTE.—A set of maps for this Despatch is on separate sale at Is. Od. net. This set of maps also covers the operations described in the other Army and Air Despatches of the Burma Campaign from 16th November, 1943 to 12th September, 1945. The following Despatch was submitted to the Finally, I have attached a table of contents Secretary of State for War on the 4th of the Despatch and two other Appendices to February, 1947, by LIEUTENANT- which reference is made in the body of the GENERAL SIR OLIVER LEESE, Bart., Despatch. K.C.B., C.B.E., D.S.O., Commander-in- PART I Chief, Allied Land Forces, South-East NARRATIVE OF OPERATIONS Asia. SECTION I (paras. 2-18) THE SITUATION ON INTRODUCTION TAKING OVER COMMAND Location of my H.Q.: Constitution of the 1. This Despatch covers the period from the command: Note on the topography and climate 12th November, 1944, on which date I of Burma: The task: Strategic plans already assumed the appointment of Commander-in- in existence: The new directive. chief, Allied Land Forces, South-East Asia, to the 15th August, 1945, when the Japanese 2. I took over 11 Army Group from General surrendered and when I relinquished my Sir George Giffard on the 12th November, appointment. I have included the planning 1944, with the new title of Commander-in- for subsequent operations, as it was initiated Chief, Allied Land Forces, South-East Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Post Distribution Monitoring Report Life-Saving Food Assistance to Idps in Kachin, Rakhine and Shan States
    Fighting Hunger Worldwide 2015 Post Distribution Monitoring Report Life-Saving Food Assistance to IDPs in Kachin, Rakhine and Shan States Table of contents List of tables and figures p.3 Executive summary p.4 Introduction p.5 Household demographics p.9 Household weekly income p.9 Distribution process p.11 Protection and gender p.16 Household consumption and use of the ration p.19 Recommendations p.26 2 List of tables and figures Figure 1: List of camps/villages sampled in Kachin and number of households sampled in each camp/village Figure 2: List of camps/villages sampled in northern Shan and number of households sampled in each camp/village Figure 3: List of camps/villages sampled in Rakhine and number of households sampled in each camp/village Figure 4: Number of income earners in the household the week preceding the interview Figure 5: Main income generating activity the week preceding the household interview Figure 6: Households with no source of income the week preceding the interview (in %) Figure 7: % of households reporting to know that their entitlements of food assistance were Figure 8: Gender of the person collecting the food at the distribution point Figure 9: Time spent at the distribution site Figure 10: Who distributed food Figure 11: Women’s presence in FMCs Figure 12: Households reporting knowing the existence of a complaint mechanism Figure 13: Households’ satisfaction on quantity and quality of the food items provided in % Figure 14: Use of the ration in Kachin, in % of the ration provided Figure 15: Use of the ration
    [Show full text]