The Israeli Spy Network That Jonathan Pollard Left Behind

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Israeli Spy Network That Jonathan Pollard Left Behind Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 25, Number 44, November 6, 1998 The Israeli spy network that Jonathan Pollard left behind by Joseph Brewda When Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu demanded miliating fiasco jeopardized U.S. interests throughout the that President Bill Clinton release imprisoned Israeli spy Jon- region, all to fulfill Israeli objectives of keeping its Arab athan Pollard before signing an agreement with the Palestin- neighbors enmired in war. The raid could never have occurred ians at the Wye Plantation summit in October, he had several except for two factors: massive intelligence conduited into objectives in mind. For one, Netanyahu wanted to pin the the U.S. government which falsely claimed that the factory blame for the hoped-for summit failure on Clinton, by making was a chemical warfare manufacturing site, and high-level an impossible demand. According to Joseph diGenova, the Israeli agents-in-place lobbying for the strike. U.S. Attorney who prosecuted Pollard, Pollard was involved EIR has long been concerned with the serious threat to in “the largest physical compromise of United States classi- U.S. national security posed by Israeli espionage. In what fied information in the 20th century,” an assessment backed follows, we review some of our investigations into the Pollard by then-Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger, who sent ring, notably as first reported in our 1986 Special Report, a memo to the court following Pollard’s 1986 conviction, “Moscow’s Secret Weapon: Ariel Sharon and the Israeli Ma- demanding that he serve life without parole. Major factions fia.” As one aspect of that investigation, EIR examined what within the U.S. intelligence establishment share that as- was dubbed the “X Committee,” the Israeli spy ring which sessment. got Pollard his job. But, blowing up the summit was not Netanyahu’s only objective. He also wanted to reassure the vast number of other Not a mole, but mole hills Pollards operating within all levels of the U.S. government’s When the FBI arrested U.S. Naval Intelligence civilian bureaucracy, that they won’t be abandoned, as Pollard ap- analyst Jonathan Pollard in November 1985 outside of his pears to have been, if they are caught. In fact, the spy ring office in Suitland, Maryland, U.S investigators had crucial that placed Pollard in U.S. Navy Intelligence has never been evidence that Israel was stealing U.S. intelligence secrets. apprehended, and is one of Israel’s most precious “crown But, more importantly, they knew Pollard was not acting jewels.” alone. The continuing importance of this ring has occasionally Among the immediate questions investigators posed, was come to light. In January 1997, for example, the National how Pollard secured what seemed to be a specially created Security Agency intercepted a phone call from a Mossad of- position in the Naval Investigative Service’s new Anti-Ter- ficer at the Israeli Embassy in Washington to Mossad chief rorist Alert Center, which gave him completely unnecessary Danny Yatom, asking whether he should access Secretary access to extremely sensitive documents from all agencies of of State Warren Christopher’s secret letters to Palestinian the U.S. government. Moreover, they determined that even a Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat though “Mega,” identified routine background check would have revealed that Pollard as an Israeli mole within Clinton’s inner circle. According to had bragged of being a Mossad agent since college, and that a leak to the U.S. press, Yatom reprimanded the agent for his father, Notre Dame microbiologist Morris Pollard, had even thinking of assigning the mole such a low-level task. worked closely with Israel’s scientific intelligence establish- U.S. investigators into “Mega” are also examining how the ment since the 1940s. In other words, Pollard had patrons. leak, which blew their top secret investigation, occurred. Ac- The cost of Pollard’s espionage was enormous. According cording to the U.S. and European media, “Mega” even suc- to Federal prosecutors, Pollard forwarded tens of thousands ceeded in taping Clinton’s phone, including tapping several of pages of highly sensitive, classified documents to his con- hours of his conversations with Monica Lewinsky. trollers in Lekem, the Israeli Defense Ministry’s scientific The disastrous U.S. bombing raid on a civilian pharma- intelligence agency. At the time, that agency was run by Rafi ceutical factory in Khartoum, Sudan, on Aug. 21, 1998, pro- Eytan, a longtime aide of Israeli Foreign Minister Gen. Ariel vides another insight into Israel’s spy ring in action. The hu- Sharon, who, among his other exploits, stole the uranium from EIR November 6, 1998 Investigation 55 © 1998 EIR News Service Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission strictly prohibited. a Westinghouse plant in Apollo, Pennsylvania, used to make tors, that the so-called “X Committee” which planted Pollard, Israel’s first nuclear bomb. had its base of operations within a fiercely “anti-Communist” Worse, while Pollard and his supporters said his spying civilian network within the Defense Department. Members was necessary to help protect Israel from its hostile neigh- of that network had been posted there despite their known ties bors, Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir forwarded many to Israeli intelligence. While many members of this network of the documents stolen by Pollard, to the Soviet Union. quietly left government in the aftermath of Pollard’s 1985 Shamir wanted Soviet Jews in exchange. It was also clear arrest and the 1986 Iran-Contra affair, overall, the network that Pollard was directed to steal documents with such trad- has remained in place, although not necessarily based at the ing purposes in mind. For example, why would Israel need Defense Department. the list of names of CIA agents operating in South Africa According to several EIR sources, Israel’s spy ring has that Pollard stole? And all this, at a time when the Reagan been massively expanded more recently by other agents who administration had already given Israel astonishing access do not display the “anti-Communist” fervor that was such a to U.S. classified information, supposedly necessary to com- useful cover during the Reagan years, but instead profess the bat the Soviet threat. “liberal” and “globalist” views considered more attractive As the investigation proceeded, more details emerged today. Without such liberal camouflage, these sources say, showing the far-reaching extent of the network, including the Israeli spy ring would never have been able to penetrate the its ties to leading U.S. Zionist organizations. highest level of the Clinton administration, and there would For one, investigations revealed that at least one of the never have been a “Mega.” persons who recommended Pollard for his job was his former Meanwhile, the “anti-Communist” division within the old professor at the Fletcher School of Diplomacy at Tufts Uni- Pollard network, which has largely moved out of the Execu- versity, the Oxford-trained Sovietologist, Uri Ra’anan. Pro- tive branch, has taken over the “Conservative Revolution” fessor Ra’anan was not just any academic. Since the 1960s, network of Congressmen and evangelical Protestants running when he first arrived in the United States as an Israeli con- the anti-Clinton witch-hunt today; for example, Pollard’s for- sular official in New York, Ra’anan has played a crucial mer attorney, Ted Olson, who has openly justified Pollard’s intermediary role between U.S. and Israeli intelligence relat- spying in the U.S. press. Olson is a former law partner of ing to allegedly shared anti-Soviet concerns. Ra’anan’s first independent counsel Kenneth Starr, and personally organized major assignment was to revamp the B’nai B’rith Anti- and sponsored at his own Washington area home, the media Defamation League’s (ADL) intelligence department, to bet- and prosecutors “salon” running the anti-Clinton campaign. ter serve Israeli needs. He also established an anti-Soviet One of Olson’s top collaborators in that venture is American intelligence cell at Edgar Bronfman’s American Jewish Con- Spectator foreign editor Michael Ledeen, who was implicated gress. in both the Iran-Contra and Pollard affairs. Ra’anan’s actions at the ADL and American Jewish Con- Below, we focus on just two of the most important opera- gress were so egregious that they helped provoke Sen. Wil- tives that investigators consulted by EIR have cited as top liam Fulbright (D-Ark.) into convening public hearings into members of the Reagan administration “X Committee” who Israeli espionage in 1963, and led to a 1967 civil lawsuit continue to push Israeli interests over those of the United by a disenchanted ADL official, Saul Joftes, who charged States: Stephen Bryen and Richard Perle. As important as Ra’anan and the group with spying for Israel. But Ra’anan both operatives are, they are merely indicative of the deeper emerged unscathed, and he later nominally left Israeli gov- problem: a vast Israeli spy ring penetrating all layers of the ernment service to teach Russian history at several U.S. uni- U.S. government bureaucracy, active within both the admin- versities. istration and its Republican-centered opposition. As a result of Ra’anan’s groundwork, Israel had no prob- lem in placing Ruth Sella, the wife of Pollard’s Lekem Richard Perle controller, Air Force Gen. Aviem Sella, in the ADL’s Legal Currently at the Washington office of the Jerusalem-based Department, during the period that the couple supervised Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies Pollard’s spying. Mrs. Sella worked particularly closely with (IASPS), Richard Perle is the acknowledged top U.S. strate- the head of the ADL Legal Department, Arnold Forster, gist of the Netanyahu regime.
Recommended publications
  • Israel: Background and U.S
    Israel: Background and U.S. Relations Casey L. Addis Analyst in Middle Eastern Affairs February 14, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33476 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Israel: Background and U.S. Relations Summary On May 14, 1948, the State of Israel declared its independence and was immediately engaged in a war with all of its neighbors. Armed conflict has marked every decade of Israel’s existence. Despite its unstable regional environment, Israel has developed a vibrant parliamentary democracy, albeit with relatively fragile governments. The most recent national elections were held on February 10, 2009, ahead of schedule. Although the Kadima Party placed first, parties holding 65 seats in the 120-seat Knesset supported opposition Likud party leader Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu, who was designated to form a government. Netanyahu’s coalition includes his own Likud, Yisrael Beiteinu (Israel Our Home), Shas, Habayet Hayehudi (Jewish Home), the United Torah Judaism (UTJ), and the new Ha’atzmout (Independence) party. The coalition controls 66 of 120 Knesset seats. Israel has an advanced industrial, market economy with a large government role. Israel’s foreign policy is focused largely on its region, Europe, and the United States. Israel’s foreign policy agenda begins with Iran, which it views as an existential threat due to Tehran’s nuclear ambitions and support for terrorism. Achieving peace with its neighbors is next. Israel concluded peace treaties with Egypt in 1979 and Jordan in 1994, but not with Syria and Lebanon. Recent unrest in Egypt is rekindling latent anxiety in Israel about the durability of the peace treaty Egypt and Israel have relied upon for 30 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Jabotinsky Institute in Israel Peres, Netanyahu and Edelstein Praise
    Jabotinsky Institute in Israel Published by the Hon. Chairman Jabotinsky Institute in Israel Mr. Yitzhak Shamir Z"L Founder and first director: Former Prime Minister of Israel ז"ל Joseph Pa'amoni Volume 52 Octobre 2013 ראש הממשלה בנימין נתניהו מעיין בכרך "לאומיות ליברלית" מאת Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu looks through volume ז'בוטינסקי, שהגישו לו )משמאל( ד"ר קרני רובין־ז'בוטינסקי, יוסי Liberal Nationalism, given to him by members of Institute אחימאיר, מרדכי שריג וכן עמירם בוקשפן. .Executive Board Peres, Netanyahu and Edelstein Praise New Volume of the Works of Jabotinsky - Liberal Nationalism “Your renewed publication of the Works of Jabotinsky, edited the new book, that he has had the honor of reading a number by Prof. Arye Naor and translated by Peter Kriksunov and of Jabotinsky’s works in their original language—Russian. He Hamutal Bar-Yosef, marks an important theoretical stratum lauded the Jabotinsky Institute for this project and stated that there in the research of Jabotinsky’s doctrine,” wrote President was a great need to aid the Institute to continue this praiseworthy Shimon Peres in a thank-you letter to the director general endeavor. of the Jabotinsky Institute in Israel for the book Liberal Liberal Nationalism, the first volume in the new series of Nationalism by Ze’ev Jabotinsky. Jabotinsky’s ideological works, is edited by Professor Arye Naor. Currently the book is being produced by the Jabotinsky Institute Peres added, “The reader of Jabotinsky’s writings cannot help but be in an annotated edition featuring new translations to Hebrew from moved by the liberalism so inherent in his doctrine, by Jabotinsky’s such languages as Russian, Yiddish and English.
    [Show full text]
  • Case #2 United States of America (Respondent)
    Model International Court of Justice (MICJ) Case #2 United States of America (Respondent) Relocation of the United States Embassy to Jerusalem (Palestine v. United States of America) Arkansas Model United Nations (AMUN) November 20-21, 2020 Teeter 1 Historical Context For years, there has been a consistent struggle between the State of Israel and the State of Palestine led by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). In 2018, United States Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced that the U.S. embassy located in Tel Aviv would be moving to the city of Jerusalem.1 Palestine, angered by the embassy moving, filed a case with the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in 2018.2 The history of this case, U.S. relations with Israel and Palestine, current events, and why the ICJ should side with the United States will be covered in this research paper. Israel and Palestine have an interesting relationship between war and competition. In 1948, Israel captured the west side of Jerusalem, and the Palestinians captured the east side during the Arab-Israeli War. Israel declared its independence on May 14, 1948. In 1949, the Lausanne Conference took place, and the UN came to the decision for “corpus separatum” which split Jerusalem into a Jewish zone and an Arab zone.3 At this time, the State of Israel decided that Jerusalem was its “eternal capital.”4 “Corpus separatum,” is a Latin term meaning “a city or region which is given a special legal and political status different from its environment, but which falls short of being sovereign, or an independent city-state.”5 1 Office of the President, 82 Recognizing Jerusalem as the Capital of the State of Israel and Relocating the United States Embassy to Israel to Jerusalem § (2017).
    [Show full text]
  • AJI 115 2 Contemporary 309..347
    334 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW Vol. 115:2 undisclosed lobbying for a pro-Russian politician and political party in Ukraine.”36 Trump also granted a full pardon to Paul Erickson, who is the former boyfriend of Russian agent Maria Butina and was convicted of a financial crime as a result of the Mueller investigation.37 Additionally, on his last day in office, Trump pardoned Aviem Sella, an Israeli citizen who recruited former U.S. Navy intelligence analyst Jonathan Pollard to spy for Israel in the 1980s.38 The White House noted that “the Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli Ambassador to the United States Ron Dermer, the United States Ambassador to Israel David Friedman, and Miriam Adelson” supported the request and that Israel “has issued a full and unequivocal apology [for its involvement], and has requested the pardon in order to close this unfortunate chapter in U.S.-Israel relations.”39 Also notable are pardons Trump ultimately did not issue. In particular, Trump chose not to pardon WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, whose extradition to the United States on espi- onage charges a British judge recently blocked.40 Trump also did not pardon himself, his adult children, his son-in-law Jared Kushner, his personal attorney Rudolph W. Giuliani, or participants in the January 6, 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol building.41 INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW U.S. Arrest of Former Mexican Defense Minister on Drug Charges Poses Challenges for Future Counter-Narcotics Cooperation doi:10.1017/ajil.2021.14 In October 2020, the United States arrested former Mexican Defense Secretary General Salvador Cienfuegos Zepeda on drug conspiracy charges, accusing him of accepting bribes to aid a Mexican cartel in evading law enforcement and transporting drugs into the United 36 Trump Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Order to End Travel Curbs on Muslims
    basketball THE FIRST ENGLISH LANGUAGE DAILY IN FREE KUWAIT markets Pages 15 & 16 Established in 1977 / www.arabtimesonline.com Page 10 THURSDAY, JANUARY 21, 2021 / JUMADA AL THANI 8, 1442 AH emergency number 112 NO. 17593 16 PAGES 150 FILS WEDNESDAY: PROCESS STARTS TO REJOIN IRAN N-DEAL Order to end travel curbs on Muslims Opinion Brotherhood starts and ends in Tunisia By Ahmed Al-Jarallah Editor-in-Chief, the Arab Times WHEN the Tunisian uprising kicked off towards the end of 2010, it was cheered by the Muslim Brotherhood Group, the Mullah regime and the US Obama administration, which out of joy called it “The Arab Spring”. However, soon it came clear that the trio were marking their territory and had distrib- uted their roles in the new game of nations. While the White House was pressuring the Arab countries to preserve what it called “freedom of opinion and expression” and allow demonstrations, the Muslim Brotherhood Group worked on urging its branches in Egypt, Syria, Libya, Mo- rocco and the Gulf states to organize more protests. The role of the Mullah regime was to dispatch its gangs to some coun- tries where it has an organized network of agents, in order to destabilize those countries and carry out terrorist and sabotage operations. This is how the threads of the conspiracy were woven. The choice of Egypt was not a second stop for the saboteurs, as it is the bastion of Arab regional security. In other words, if it falls, it becomes easy to reach the rest of the Arab countries, especially the Gulf countries, which the Muslim Brotherhood Group and the Iranians considered as the grand prize for who- ever manages to control them.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensions of Remarks Section
    May 14, 1997 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð Extensions of Remarks E911 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS HUMANITARIAN AIDÐCHIAPAS, who one day we hope will be officially leading religious values. In accordance with custom MEXICO China. But today he is someone who struggles over several thousand years, they wanted to just to stay alive during his second 14-year carry out the reform by themselves. They did not like the idea of being reformed by HON. SAM JOHNSON prison sentence. He is sick. He has lost all of foreigners or foreigner-like Han people (KMT OF TEXAS his teeth. And yet he still displays incredible managed to respect this tradition so that re- courage. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES lations between KMT and Tibet were more Soon after the Tiannanmen Square mas- harmonious). Tuesday, May 13, 1997 sacre, in an incredible display of courage, Wei During the early 1950s, the Chinese Com- Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Speaker, Jingsheng wrote to Deng Xiaoping stating: munist Party was at its height. Like all So, now that you've successfully carried other communist parties, it had little re- as our relationship with Mexico becomes more spect for sovereignty and national self-deter- and more important to the economic well- out a military coup to deal with a group of unarmed and politically inexperienced stu- mination. Meanwhile, India, which just being of our Nation, I would like to bring to gained independence from British rule, could this body's attention the sacrificial effort of 48 dents and citizens, how do you feel? * * * I've long known that you are precisely the kind hardly afford to help Tibet in its struggle young men, who at their own expense and of idiot to do something foolish like this, against the Chinese Communist Party.
    [Show full text]
  • The President's News Conference with Prime Minister Ariel Sharon Of
    Administration of George W. Bush, 2003 / July 29 995 I have enclosed a copy of the Executive bors. If we are ever to reach our common Order I have issued. This Order becomes ef- goal of two states living side by side in peace fective at 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time and security, leaders must assume responsi- on July 29, 2003. bility. The Prime Minister is assuming re- Sincerely, sponsibility. All parties agree that a fundamental obsta- George W. Bush cle to peace is terrorism, which can never be justified by any cause. Last month in NOTE: Identical letters were sent to J. Dennis Hastert, Speaker of the House of Representatives, Aqaba, Prime Minister Abbas committed to and Richard B. Cheney, President of the Senate. a complete end to violence and terrorism. H.R. 2330, approved July 28, was assigned Public The Palestinian Authority must undertake Law No. 108–61. sustained, targeted, and effective operations to confront those engaged in terror and to dismantle terrorist capabilities and infra- The President’s News Conference structure. We’re determined to help Prime With Prime Minister Ariel Sharon of Minister Abbas as he works to end terror and Israel establish the rule of law that will protect July 29, 2003 Israelis and Palestinians alike. Today I urge Arab states to follow through President Bush. Good day. I’m pleased on the pledges made in Sharm el-Sheikh to to welcome Prime Minister Ariel Sharon actively contribute to these efforts and to re- back to the White House. I think you said ject the culture of extremism and violence this is our eighth meeting—— from whatever source or place.
    [Show full text]
  • Jonathan Pollard: Background and Considerations for Presidential Clemency
    Order Code RS20001 Updated January 31, 2001 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Jonathan Pollard: Background and Considerations for Presidential Clemency Richard A. Best, Jr. Specialist in National Defense Clyde Mark Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs Foreign Affairs and National Defense Division Summary Jonathan Jay Pollard and his wife, Anne Henderson Pollard, were arrested in 1985 on charges of spying for Israel. Pollard pleaded guilty and received a life sentence, and remains in prison. Anne Henderson Pollard received a five-year sentence, and was released early in 1989. At first, the Israeli government claimed Pollard’s activities were not sanctioned by the Israeli government and were part of a rogue operation, but the Israeli government granted citizenship to Pollard in 1996, and admitted that Pollard was spying for the government of Israel in 1998. Israeli Prime Ministers on several occasions requested that President Clinton grant clemency to Pollard, but the Clinton Administration ended without a reprieve. It is likely that the Israeli government will raise the issue again and some U.S. groups continue to advocate Pollard’s release. At issue is the question: should the President grant clemency to Jonathan Pollard? Those supporting clemency argue that Pollard has served long enough, that he spied for a friendly nation, not an enemy, that his release will help the peace process, and that the United States reneged on the plea agreement. Those who oppose clemency argue that Pollard’s spying exposed U.S. intelligence methods and personnel, that the Pollard case is not related to the peace process, that who he spied for is irrelevant, and that the judges’ sentence was justified by the magnitude of the crime.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Jonathan Pollard's Release Means Little by David Makovsky
    MENU Policy Analysis / Articles & Op-Eds Why Jonathan Pollard's Release Means Little by David Makovsky Jul 28, 2015 Also available in Arabic ABOUT THE AUTHORS David Makovsky David Makovsky is the Ziegler distinguished fellow at The Washington Institute and director of the Koret Project on Arab-Israel Relations. Articles & Testimony Given the current state of the region, close U.S.-Israeli security and intelligence cooperation is more vital than ever, but repairing the rift between the two governments will require much more than symbolic gestures. lthough the Israelis have demanded his release for decades, the imminent parole of convicted Israeli spy A Jonathan Pollard after almost 30 years in prison is not likely to put even a dent in the iciness between President Obama and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu surrounding the Iran nuclear deal. And that is evidence of just how far Washington and Jerusalem have to go before they can get to the place both countries desperately need to be: cooperating closely to deal with a volcanic Middle East. The U.S. and Israel simply do not have the luxury of continued rancor, no matter what happens to the Iran deal. Whether it is a question of monitoring Iran, holding it to account or managing Islamist chaos throughout the region, the two countries are compelled to cooperate in security and intelligence matters. As for Pollard, his parole should be seen as little more than a footnote. While the Department of Justice said the U.S. would favor Pollard's parole, the White House was very careful not to trumpet this move as a gesture to Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the U.S. Attorneys
    Bicentennial Celebration of the United States Attorneys 1789 - 1989 "The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done. As such, he is in a peculiar and very definite sense the servant of the law, the twofold aim of which is that guilt shall not escape or innocence suffer. He may prosecute with earnestness and vigor– indeed, he should do so. But, while he may strike hard blows, he is not at liberty to strike foul ones. It is as much his duty to refrain from improper methods calculated to produce a wrongful conviction as it is to use every legitimate means to bring about a just one." QUOTED FROM STATEMENT OF MR. JUSTICE SUTHERLAND, BERGER V. UNITED STATES, 295 U. S. 88 (1935) Note: The information in this document was compiled from historical records maintained by the Offices of the United States Attorneys and by the Department of Justice. Every effort has been made to prepare accurate information. In some instances, this document mentions officials without the “United States Attorney” title, who nevertheless served under federal appointment to enforce the laws of the United States in federal territories prior to statehood and the creation of a federal judicial district. INTRODUCTION In this, the Bicentennial Year of the United States Constitution, the people of America find cause to celebrate the principles formulated at the inception of the nation Alexis de Tocqueville called, “The Great Experiment.” The experiment has worked, and the survival of the Constitution is proof of that.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. to Free Israeli Spy Jonathan Pollard in November
    U.S. to Free Israeli Spy Jonathan Pollard in November Washington, July 29 (RHC)-- The United States is granting parole to Jonathan Pollard after three decades of imprisonment on charges of spying for Israel. Pollard, a former U.S. Naval intelligence analyst who spied for the Tel Aviv regime, will be freed from life sentence, his lawyers announced on Tuesday. The decision, made unanimously by the three members of the Parole Commission, was later confirmed by the U.S. Justice Department. The spy, who had tried to gain asylum at the Israeli embassy in Washington, is slated to be set free on November 21st. The Tel Aviv regime considers Pollard an Israeli agent and has granted him citizenship. "After decades of effort, Jonathan Pollard will finally be released," Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a statement. "Throughout his time in prison, I consistently raised the issue of his release in my meetings and conversations with the leadership of successive U.S. administrations. We are looking forward to his release." Other Israeli officials also reacted to the announcement, with Israeli Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked, saying: "Thirty years of suffering will come to an end this November; not though kindness but through the law." Pollard was convicted of passing classified information to Israel and he has been jailed since 1987. A recent poll showed that the majority of Americans oppose the provision of any special compensation to Israel for its concern over a nuclear agreement with Iran. The poll by Google Consumer Surveys found that 67.8 percent of Americans oppose any sort of compensation to Israel, while only 12.8 percent support it.
    [Show full text]
  • Sh'ma Ed, "I Feel Distress for You My Brother Jonathan." I I I Have Learned Much from Jonathan, "My Brother"
    biblical David and Jonathan; of Jonathan, David lament- , Sh'ma ed, "I feel distress for you my brother Jonathan." i i I have learned much from Jonathan, "my brother". He ! a journal of Jewish responsibility has taught me much about Jewish pride, about admit- 23/453 APRIL 30, 1993 ting wrong in the most difficult of circumstances, about inner strength in the face of unbearable prison condi- tions. about going on and believing in our people even as certain segments of the American Jewish leadership and, in earlier years the Israeli government, abandoned him. Over the course of these years, I've tried to step back to reflect on Jonathan's human condition. What follows is an attempt to connect with Jonathan's soul, to under- stand his inner feelings and to articulate what I believe to be Jonathan's sentiments on some of the key issues and conflicts he faces. For those in government who may read this piece, let it be said clearly, none of the thoughts here are Jonathan's unless otherwise indicated. One can only truly understand the moral dilemma Jona- than Pollard faced as a U.S. Naval Intelligence officer when one takes into account the background of his With jonathan pollard early years. Avi Weiss "If Not Me, Who?" When Jonathan Pollard first asked me to serve as his Jonathan Pollard was raised in a family where loyalties personal rabbi in May of 1987, 1 did so with a sense of as a Jew and as an American were one. Jonathan was rabbinic responsibility.
    [Show full text]