Elected Officials
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chapter 9 Quiz
Name: ___________________________________ Date: ______________ 1. The diffusion of authority and power throughout several entities in the executive branch and the bureaucracy is called A) the split executive B) the bureaucratic institution C) the plural executive D) platform diffusion 2. A government organization that implements laws and provides services to individuals is the A) executive branch B) legislative branch C) judicial branch D) bureaucracy 3. What is the ratio of bureaucrats to Texans? A) 1 bureaucrat for every 1,500 Texas residents B) 1 bureaucrat for every 3,500 Texas residents C) 1 bureaucrat for every 4,000 Texas residents D) 1 bureaucrat for every 10,000 Texas residents 4. The execution by the bureaucracy of laws and decisions made by the legislative, executive, or judicial branch, is referred to as A) implementation B) diffusion C) execution of law D) rules 5. How does the size of the Texas bureaucracy compare to other states? A) smaller than most other states B) larger than most other states C) about the same D) Texas does not have a bureaucracy 6. Standards that are established for the function and management of industry, business, individuals, and other parts of government, are called A) regulations B) licensing C) business laws D) bureaucratic law 7. What is the authorization process that gives a company, an individual, or an organization permission to carry out a specific task? A) regulations B) licensing C) business laws D) bureaucratic law 8. The carrying out of rules by an agency or commission within the bureaucracy, is called A) implementation B) rule-making C) licensing D) enforcement 9. -
Politics 1-6 Commentary 6-7 FORUM Duly Noted 8
CONTENTS Politics 1-6 Commentary 6-7 FORUM Duly Noted 8 JULY 15, 1974 Vol. X, No. 14 50 CENTS POLITICS: REPORTS islation, but the implementation now under way of the new law's rules is still a controversial topic. COLORADO Daniels, a Denver businessman and part-owner of the Utah Stars basket Furthermore, there is some danger ball team, has drawn the bulk of his that the burning issue of the upcoming In only six states this year, incum support from state and Denver party Denver congressional race may spill bent governors will face or have faced leaders. Competition between the two over into state politics. A bitter fight serious primary challenges. GOP aspirants perhaps peaked in is expected between U.S. Rep. Patricia In South Dakota and Texas, respec Denver June 1 when delegates to the Schroeder (D) and State Rep. Frank tively, Democratic incumbents annihi state assembly were chosen. Daniels Southworth. Southworth, president of lated more liberal challengers with sur needed a strong showing from his the Denver Board of Education, is an prising ease. In Florida, Gov. Reubin Denver supporters but failed to get outspoken opponent of school busing Askew (D) is expected to have the it. In the pre-meeting acrimony, Den and is expected to make it his major same success, but in Oklahoma, the ver GOP Chairman James Aspinal, a issue. The publicity given busing could politi~allife expectancy of Gov. David Daniels backer, denied Denver GOP conceivably complicate the state guber Hall (D), embattled by investigations Secretary Mary Hofstra, a Vanderhoof natorial race as well. -
Jesse M. Unruh Interviewer: Dennis O’Brien Date of Interview: June 18, 1969 Place of Interview: Sacramento, California Length: 15 Pp
Jesse M. Unruh Oral History Interview –RFK #1, 6/18/1969 Administrative Information Creator: Jesse M. Unruh Interviewer: Dennis O’Brien Date of Interview: June 18, 1969 Place of Interview: Sacramento, California Length: 15 pp. Biographical Note Unruh, Jesse M.; Chairman, John F. Kennedy [JFK] Presidential Campaign, California, 1960; Chairman, Robert F. Kennedy Presidential Campaign, California, 1968. Unruh discusses his perceptions of JFK, JFK’s campaign staff, and the Democratic National Convention held in California (1960), among other issues. Access Restrictions No restrictions. Usage Restrictions Copyright of these materials has been passed to the United States Government upon the death of the interviewee. Users of these materials are advised to determine the copyright status of any document from which they wish to publish. Copyright The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excesses of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. The copyright law extends its protection to unpublished works from the moment of creation in a tangible form. -
Stanley Mosk: a Federalist for the 1980'S Arthur J
Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly Volume 12 Article 6 Number 3 Spring 1985 1-1-1985 Stanley Mosk: A Federalist for the 1980's Arthur J. Goldberg Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_constitutional_law_quaterly Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Arthur J. Goldberg, Stanley Mosk: A Federalist for the 1980's, 12 Hastings Const. L.Q. 395 (1985). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_constitutional_law_quaterly/vol12/iss3/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLES Stanley Mosk: A Federalist for the 1980's By ARTHUR J. GOLDBERG* Introduction The era of the Burger Court has been marked by significant erosions of the safeguards set forth in the Bill of Rights.1 A number of the Court's decisions have overturned or circumscribed important Warren Court opinions, particularly in the area of civil rights and civil liberties.2 This trend has been criticized sharply by several members of the Court who-contrary to long-standing practice-have "gone public" to air their views.3 * Former Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. Distinguished Professor of Law Emeritus, Hastings College of the Law. The author is grateful for the assistance of Meredith J. Watts, a member of the California Bar and a former editor of the Hastings ConstitutionalLaw Quarterly, in the preparation of this article. -
United States V. Mandel: the Mail Fraud and En Banc Procedural Issues
Maryland Law Review Volume 40 | Issue 4 Article 5 United States v. Mandel: the Mail Fraud and en Banc Procedural Issues Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr Part of the Civil Procedure Commons Recommended Citation United States v. Mandel: the Mail Fraud and en Banc Procedural Issues, 40 Md. L. Rev. 550 (1981) Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr/vol40/iss4/5 This Casenotes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maryland Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Note UNITED STATES v. MANDEL: THE MAIL FRAUD AND EN BANC PROCEDURAL ISSUES INTRODUCTION When Governor Marvin Mandel and his five codefendants were convicted of mail fraud1 and racketeering,2 Maryland politics seemed hopelessly corrupt. In a space of five years Marylanders had seen one of their United States senators, their former governor, and then their sitting governor haled into federal court on criminal charges.3 Yet United States v.Mandel 4 is disturbing, not merely because it suggests that Marylanders again were victimized by one of their top 1. 18 U.S.C. § 1341 provides in pertinent part: Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises . for the purpose of executing -
Pre Rce Srategy: No Hel F,Mr
Statesman~~~~~~~~ .j6A PrI VOLUME 16 NUMBER 14 STONY BRkOOK. N.Y. ____ TU ESDAYI, OCTOB ER 31, 1972 Pre RCe Srategy: No Hel F,Mr By HOWIE BRANDSTEIN whole night to ponder such thoughts. What does a runner think about the night before In what Pat runner Ralph Egyud characterized .a race? Pre-race strategy, unlike the lengthy as something akin to the "high school cattle races" prepratins involved in something like football, is held weekly at Van Cortlandt Park, 140 "runners a relatively simple matter for the runner. from 17 schools were slated to go off at the gun '.'Know thyself, says Jim Smith, coach of the the following day at the Albany Invitationals. The Stony Brook cross country team. '"Run faster," five mile course, described in a brochure as "35% says Moe Davis, former track grioat. ma11cadam,. 65% 'dirt, gravel, and grass,"" gently It all comes down to the same thing, really. If winds around Albany's man-made pond in a figure' you're good, you're good (the opposite holds, too) eight. The campus itself - with its "Espider web" of and whether you plan to wear a Dave Wottle hat or spiraling arches and enormous symmetrical a -leopard-skin jock won't make any difference. quandrangles - is an interesting, if not surrealistic, And when the Patriots finally disembarked at a background for a race. hotel opposite the Albany campus, they had a (Continued on page 15), I (S(...To Set Lp A Bargaininas Group So That Students Can Get a Fair New York State Housing Contract." See Page' 5 Dorm Cooking Renovations Sow Efct *A STAGIOBNTONo apns disappo ntment was what Sandra Weeden's women's tenn's team team to victory. -
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT PROCEEDINGS BEFORE the SUPREME COURT of the UNITED STATES Me
mmIltllfel m § mm wmBwMM OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Me DKT/CASE NO. MARGARET R. BROWN, ET AL., Appellants v. TITLE THYRA THOMSON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF WYOMING, ET AL PLACE Washington, D. C. DATE March 21, 1983 PAGES 1 thru 42 5 ALDERSON REPORTING (202) 628-9300 440 FIRST STREET, N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20001 1 IN TH 5 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 2 ------------------- -x 3 MARGARET R. BROWN, ET AL., i 4 Appellants : 5 v « • Me. 82 — 63 6 THYRA THOMSON, SECRETARY OF STATE 1 7 OF WYOMING, ET AL, l 8 ------------------- -x 9 Washington, O.C. 10 Monday, March 21, 1983 11 The above-antitled matter came on for oral 12 argument before the Supreme Court of the Unitad States 13 at 10104 a.m. 14 APPEARANCESi 15 SUELLEN L. DAVIDSON, ESC., Cheyanre, Wyoming} 16 on behalf cf the Appellant. 17 RANCALL T. CCX, ESC., Assistant Attorney General of 18 Wyoming, Cheyenne, Wyoming, on behalf of the Appellees. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. 440 FIRST ST., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20001 (202) 628-9300 1 £ 2 n n h n 2 3 SUELLEN L. DAVIDSCN, cow. 4 on behalf of the Appellant 3 5 RANDALL T. COX, ESQ. 6 o n behalf of the State of Wyoming 23 7 SUELLEN L. DAVIDSCN, ESQ. 8 on behalf of the Appellant -- rebuttal 39 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC. -
Samuel Ernest Vandiver, Jr
OH Vandiver 01C Samuel Ernest Vandiver, Jr. interviewed by Mel Steeley and Ted Fitzsimmons Date: 6/25/86 Cassettes #439 (56 minutes) COPY OF ORIGINAL INTERVIEW ORIGINAL AT WEST GEORGIA UNIVERSITY Side One Fitzsimmons: Governor, we were talking about the integration of the university, and you said in making a decision you talked to a number of people, and among them Senator [Richard Brevard, Jr.] Russell. What was his advice? Vandiver: Well, I think you probably know what his situation was. He had fought these battles in the Senate for many, many years. And, of course, he knew from his practice of law and his familiarity with the law that I had no choice except to follow the law. That I couldn't, if I had defied the court, then I had no choice except to try to get the state of Georgia to secede again from the Union. And we'd tried that once and hadn't done too well that time. And so he knew that I had no choice. One thing that Betty [Sybil Elizabeth] Vandiver and I have talked about a great deal was her father was a federal judge; he was a judge of the northern district of Georgia. And he never had to deal with this situation. He knew it was probably coming, but he became ill with cancer, and he died in 1955 before this situation ever came before his court. And we've thought about it many times, that the Lord was kind to him. He would have had to rule in such a way that it would have been extremely difficult for him. -
Interview Transcript
Transcription: Richard Overton ________________________________________________________________ First of all good morning, and thank you for letting us be here today to interview you. It’s an honor for us and for our program. I want to start by letting folks listening or watching that today is Thursday, September 12th, 2013. My name is James Crabtree and you are Mr. Richard Overton, and we are at your home in Austin, Texas. So that way anybody listening to this knows when and where we did this interview. Sir, thank you again for letting us be here. The first question I always like to ask veterans is please tell us a little bit about your childhood and your life before you went into the military Richard Overton: Well, I’ll tell you I was out in the country then. Where were you born? Richard Overton: I was born out between Bastrop and Lockhart, at the same area Conn is. Did you grow up on a farm or did you grow up in town? Richard Overton: I started growing up in the country, and left there and went to Taylor. After that I went to Dallas. Did you come from a large family? Did you have a lot of siblings? Richard Overton: I had six sisters and four brothers. I was the fourth brother, and all dead except me. What was it like having that many siblings? Richard Overton: It was lovely, but I had to take care of ‘em. My daddy died way back in the 20s I think, somewhere back in there. But anyway, I had to take care of my mother and the other family. -
Hugh M. Gillis Papers
Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Finding Aids 1995 Hugh M. Gillis papers Zach S. Henderson Library. Georgia Southern University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/finding-aids Part of the American Politics Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Zach S. Henderson Library. Georgia Southern University, "Hugh M. Gillis papers" (1995). Finding Aids. 10. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/finding-aids/10 This finding aid is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Finding Aids by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HUGH M. GILLIS PAPERS FINDING AID OVERVIEW OF COLLECTION Title: Hugh M. Gillis papers Date: 1957-1995 Extent: 1 Box Creator: Gillis, Hugh M., 1918-2013 Language: English Repository: Zach S. Henderson Library Special Collections, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA. [email protected]. 912-478-7819. library.georgiasouthern.edu. Processing Note: Finding aid revised in 2020. INFORMATION FOR USE OF COLLECTION Conditions Governing Access: The collection is open for research use. Physical Access: Materials must be viewed in the Special Collections Reading Room under the supervision of Special Collections staff. Conditions Governing Reproduction and Use: In order to protect the materials from inadvertent damage, all reproduction services are performed by the Special Collections staff. All requests for reproduction must be submitted using the Reproduction Request Form. Requests to publish from the collection must be submitted using the Publication Request Form. Special Collections does not claim to control the rights to all materials in its collection. -
Directory of State and Local Government
DIRECTORY OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT Prepared by RESEARCH DIVISION LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL BUREAU 2020 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Please refer to the Alphabetical Index to the Directory of State and Local Government for a complete list of agencies. NEVADA STATE GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART ............................................. D-9 CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION ............................................................................................. D-13 DIRECTORY OF STATE GOVERNMENT CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS: Attorney General ........................................................................................................................ D-15 State Controller ........................................................................................................................... D-19 Governor ..................................................................................................................................... D-20 Lieutenant Governor ................................................................................................................... D-27 Secretary of State ........................................................................................................................ D-28 State Treasurer ............................................................................................................................ D-30 EXECUTIVE BOARDS ................................................................................................................. D-31 NEVADA SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION -
Urge Partners in Iran Deal to Uphold It Despite Trump
Urge Partners in Iran Deal to Uphold It Despite Trump To: The governments of Germany, Russia, UK, France and China CC: Federica Mogherini, High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy We urge you to uphold the Iran nuclear deal and insist on full economic relations with Iran. Name City State Country Comment Sorry our president Trump is not on the right page. - We urge you to Sharon Fortunak St Paul MN US uphold the Iran nuclear deal and insist on full economic relations with Iran. Thank you. Gregory Manore Northville MI US The Iran nuclear deal is vital in helping to bring peace to the Middle Amory Jewett Holland MI US East. Mr. Trump has made a very serious mistake by withdrawing from the agreement. Carsten Whimster Berlin ot DE Martha Kransdorf Ann Arbor MI US Martin Balk Quitman TX US Even thoough the "administration" is not supportive, courageous B Erich Richards Beaverton OR US countries around the world will still be. Thanks. Sarah Lanzman Dyke VA US Sadly, Trump does not represent the majority of Americans. Many David Mayer Olympia WA US of us are sickened by his actions and his words. Please do all you can to uphold this agreement. Donald Shaw St. Petersburg FL US Chris Drumright MUrfreesboro TN US Resist the unilateral and capricious actions of the current US Jason Allen Portland OR US administration and empress the world body's focus on peace and world stability. RootsAction.org 1 / 552 Name City State Country Comment Kathy Luedtke Momence IL US Laura Hanks Milwaukie OR US Please continue the Iran deal in spite of Trump's betrayal.