Latest AIJAC Submission On
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Holocaust-Denial Literature: a Fourth Bibliography
City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research York College 2000 Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Fourth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki CUNY York College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/yc_pubs/25 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Fourth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki This bibliography is a supplement to three earlier ones published in the March 1994, Decem- ber 1996, and September 1998 issues of the Bulletin of Bibliography. During the intervening time. Holocaust revisionism has continued to be discussed both in the scholarly literature and in the mainstream press, especially owing to the libel lawsuit filed by David Irving against Deb- orah Lipstadt and Penguin Books. The Holocaust deniers, who prefer to call themselves “revi- sionists” in an attempt to gain scholarly legitimacy, have refused to go away and remain as vocal as ever— Bradley R. Smith has continued to send revisionist advertisements to college newspapers (including free issues of his new publication. The Revisionist), generating public- ity for his cause. Holocaust-denial, which will be used interchangeably with Holocaust revisionism in this bib- liography, is a body of literature that seeks to “prove” that the Jewish Holocaust did not hap- pen. Although individual revisionists may have different motives and beliefs, they all share at least one point: that there was no systematic attempt by Nazi Germany to exterminate Euro- pean Jewry. -
Holocaust Denial in Australia
ABSTRACT This paper explores the nature of Holocaust denial in Australia. It does so through a study of the beliefs and activities of the three organizations for whom Holocaust denial is a central belief: the Australian League of Rights, the Australian Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and the Adelaide Institute. Their activities, their international ties, and their relationship with the broader racist Right in Australia is considered. The paper concludes by reflecting on the future directions and responses to Holocaust denial. INTRODUCTION The nature of Australian Holocaust denial organizations, their activities, and their place in broader far Right circles is different from denial organizations in other countries. This is explained by the dominant role of the Australian League of Rights in far Right politics, the civil liberties origins of the Australian Civil Liberties Union, the lack of sizeable neo- Nazi groups in Australia, and the dominance of anti-Aboriginal and anti- Asian issues on the far Right agenda. In addition, unlike many European countries where denial is explained as a response to their wartime collaboration with the Nazis, this motive does not exist in Australia which fought against the Nazis and her allies. Although Holocaust denial is a fringe activity in Australia, it has significantly increased over the last two decades with a concomitant growth in collaboration between Australian and overseas Holocaust deniers. This is not just a Jewish concern for Holocaust deniers have become a leading element within the racist Right with whom they share a common worldview. This is because in addition to their antisemitism, Australian Holocaust deniers expound racist and xenophobic policies and views. -
Holocaust-Denial Literature: a Third Bibliography
City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research York College 1998 Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Third Bibliography John A. Drobnicki CUNY York College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/yc_pubs/26 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Third Bibliography John A. Drobnicki This bibliography is a supplement to two earlier ones published in the March 1994 and Decem- ber 1996 issues of the Bulletin of Bibliography. During the intervening time, Holocaust revision- ism has continued to be discussed in both the scholarly literature and the mainstream press. The Holocaust deniers, who prefer to call themselves “revisionists” in an attempt to gain scholarly le- gitimacy, have refused to go away and remain as vocal as ever— Bradley R. Smith has contin- ued to send revisionist advertisements to college newspapers, generating publicity for his cause. Holocaust-denial, which will be used interchangeably with Holocaust revisionism in this bib- liography, is a body of literature that seeks to “prove” that the Jewish Holocaust did not hap- pen. Although individual revisionists may have different motives and beliefs, they all share at least one point: that there was no systematic attempt by Nazi Germany to exterminate Euro- pean Jewry. Hence, they claim that the Holocaust is a “hoax” perpetrated by Jews (“Zionists”) in an attempt to blackmail the rest of the world for sympathy, money, and legitimacy for the state of Israel. -
Antisemitism Worldwide 2016
The Lester and Sally Entin Faculty of Humanities Moshe Kantor Database for the Study of Contemporary Antisemitism and Racism Antisemitism Worldwide 2016 General Analysis Draft European Jewish Congress Ze'ev Vered Desk for the Study of Tolerance and Intolerance in the Middle East, Stephen Roth Institute for the Study of Contemporary Antisemitism and Racism 1 The Lester and Sally Entin Faculty of Humanities Moshe Kantor Database for the Study of Contemporary Antisemitism and Racism Antisemitism Worldwide 2016 General Analysis Draft European Jewish Congress Ze'ev Vered Desk for the Study of Tolerance and Intolerance in the Middle East, Stephen Roth Institute for the Study of Contemporary Antisemitism and Racism 2 Editor Dina Porat, Head of the Kantor Center Kantor Center Researchers Irena Cantorovich – Post Soviet Region Lidia Lerner – Latin America Sarah Rembiszewski – Western Europe and Germany Mikael Shainkman – Scandinavia Raphael Vago – Hungary, Romania and Slovakia Contributors Esther Webman – Arab and Muslim Countries Michal Navoth - Greece Jean Yves Camus – (Observatoire des Radicalités Politiques, Fondation Jean Jaurès) - France Renee Dayan Shabot (Tribuna Israelita) - Mexico Julia Edthofer & Carina Klammer (FGA) - Austria Simon Erlanger (University of Lucerne) - Switzerland Stefano Gatti and Betti Guetta (CDEC, Osservatorio Antisemitismo) - Italy Amanda Hohman (B'nai Brith) – Canada Jeremy Jones (AIJAC) – Australia Joël Kotek (Sciences Po Paris) – Belgium Vyacheslav Likhachev (EAJC) - Ukraine Luiz Nazario - Brazil Rafal Pankowski (Never Again) - Poland Beatriz Rittigstein (CAIV) – Venezuela David Sacks (Board of Deputies) - South Africa Oren Segal (ADL) - USA Veronika Šternová (Prague Jewish Community) – Czech Republic Zbyněk Tarant (University of West Bohemia) - Czech Republic Mike Whine (CST) – United Kingdom Statistics and Data Analysis Haim Fireberg Webmaster Adrian Gruszniewski Language Editor Zelda Katz Copy Editor Talia Naamat Website http://kantorcenter.tau.ac.il/ The Kantor Center team would like to express its deep gratitude to all contributors. -
A Discourse Analysis of Holocaust Denial Web Sites
City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research College of Staten Island 2004 Rewriting the Holocaust Online: A Discourse Analysis of Holocaust Denial Web Sites Mark Aaron Polger City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/si_pubs/157 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Rewriting The Holocaust Online: A Discourse Analysis of Holocaust Denial Web Sites by Mark Aaron Polger A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in Sociology Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2004 ©Mark Aaron Polger 2004 Table of Contents Author’s Declaration ii Borrower’s Page iii Abstract iv Acknowledgements v Dedication vi Table of Contents vii Chapter One: Introduction 1 Why Holocaust Denial? 1 What is Holocaust Denial? 2 Where Does Holocaust Denial Flourish? 4 Definitions 5 Anti-Semitism 5 Digital Library 7 Discourse 8 Discourse Analysis 8 Hate Group 9 Historical Revisionism 9 Holocaust 11 Holocaust Trivialization 12 Legitimacy 14 Race 15 Zionism 16 The Holocaust Today 18 Thesis Questions 20 How do deniers attempt to attain legitimacy through their web pages? 20 What rhetorical strategies do they employ on their web sites? 21 Thesis Outline 22 Chapter Two: Literature Review 23 Holocaust Denial on the Internet 23 Holocaust -
The Web of Hate: an Exploratory Study of Holocaust Denial on the Net
THE WEB OF HATE: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF HOLOCAUST DENIAL ON THE NET Daniela Di Giacomo B.A. (Hon), University of Ottawa, 2002 D.E.C., CEGEP John Abbott, Ste. Anne de Bellevue, 1999 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS In the School of Criminology O Daniela Di Giacomo 2005 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2005 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. Simon Fraser University Ethics Approval The author, whose name appears on the title page of this work, has obtained human research ethics approval from the Simon Fraser University Office of Research Ethics for the research described in this work, or has conducted the research as a member of a project or course approved by the Ethics Office. A copy of the approval letter has been filed at the Theses Office of the University Library at the time of submission of this thesis or project. The original application for ethics approval and letter of approval is filed with the Office of Research Ethics. Inquiries may be directed to that Office. Bennett Library Simon Fraser University Burnaby, BC, Canada Holocaust denial is one manifestation of racist and antisemitic thought, the scope of which has increased dramatically over the last decade, especially on the Internet. This thesis applies an anti-racism framework to the study of Holocaust denial on the Internet with the objectives of identifying the key claims made by Holocaust deniers, the themes emerging from these claims, and how practitioners working in the fight against hate understand and identify the phenomenon of Holocaust denial. -
Antisemitism Report 2010 1 October 2009 – 30 September 2010
Executive Council of Australian Jewry Antisemitism Report 2010 1 October 2009 – 30 September 2010 THIS REPORT WAS WHOLLY RESEARCHED AND WRITTEN BY JEREMY JONES AM, TO ASSIST UNDERSTANDING OF ANTI-JEWISH VIOLENCE, VANDALISM, HARASSMENT AND PREJUDICE IN CONTEMPORARY AUSTRALIA Jeremy Jones is Director of International and Community Affairs, Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council and Honorary Life Member, Executive Council of Australian Jewry This document should not be reproduced or distributed, and the original work not quoted, without the express permission of the author. 140 William Street, East Sydney, NSW 2011, AUSTRALIA Phone: +61 2 9360 5415 Facsimile: +61 2 9360 5416 E-mail: [email protected] September 2010 REPORT ON ANTISEMITISM IN AUSTRALIA 1 October 2009– 30 September 2010 THIS REPORT WAS WHOLLY RESEARCHED AND WRITTEN BY JEREMY JONES AM, TO ASSIST UNDERSTANDING OF ANTI-JEWISH VIOLENCE, VANDALISM, HARASSMENT AND PREJUDICE IN CONTEMPORARY AUSTRALIA Jeremy Jones is Director of International and Community Affairs, Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council and Honorary Life Member, Executive Council of Australian Jewry This document should not be reproduced or distributed, and the original work not quoted, without the express permission of the author. 140 William Street, East Sydney, NSW 2011, AUSTRALIA Phone: +61 2 9360 5415 Facsimile: +61 2 9360 5416 E-mail: [email protected] November 2010 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 The Year in Review 3 1.2 Racism in Australia and Antisemitism 5 1.3 Forms of Antisemitism 6 2.0 COMMON -
Holocaust, Genocide and the Law
Holocaust, Genocide and the Law Spring 2006 Professor Michael Bazyler Whittier Law School Professor Stephen Feinstein University of Minnesota TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................1 1. Food For Thought....................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Death By Government - R.J. Rummel........................................................................................................ 2 3. The War Against The Jews - Lucy S. Dawidowicz.................................................................................... 5 4. The Destruction of The European Jews - Raul Hilberg.............................................................................. 6 5. Definition Of 'Genocide'............................................................................................................................. 8 6. Institute For The Study Of Genocide.......................................................................................................... 8 7. Modern Use and Misuse of Holocaust Terminology and Imagery........................................................... 10 a. PETA’s “Holocaust On Your Plate” Campaign................................................................................... 10 b. Holocaust comparisons resume ........................................................................................................... 14 c. After Peace: The First Palestinian-Israeli -
Holocaust-Denial Literature: a Fifth Bibliography
City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research York College 2002 Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Fifth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki CUNY York College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/yc_pubs/16 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Holocaust-Denial Literature; A Fifth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki This bibliography is a supplement to four earlier ones published in the March 1994, December 1996, September 1998, and December 2000 issues of the Bulletin of Bibliography. During the intervening time. Holocaust revisionism has continued to be discussed both in the scholarly lit- erature and in the mainstream press, especially due to the libel lawsuit filed by David-Irving against Deborah Lipstadt and Penguin Books and his subsequent appeal of that verdict. The Holocaust deniers, who prefer to call themselves “revisionists” in an attempt to gain scholarly legitimacy, have refused to go away and remain as vocal as ever— Bradley R. Smith has con- tinued to send revisionist advertisements to college newspapers, generating publicity for his cause. Holocaust denial, which will be used interchangeably with Holocaust revisionism in this bib- liography, is a body of literature that seeks to “prove” that the Jewish Holocaust did not hap- pen. Although individual revisionists may have different motives and beliefs, they all share at least one point: that there was no systematic attempt by Nazi Germany to exterminate Euro- pean Jewry. -
![Jones V Toben (Includes Explanatory Memorandum) [2002] FCA 1150 (17 September 2002)](https://docslib.b-cdn.net/cover/8221/jones-v-toben-includes-explanatory-memorandum-2002-fca-1150-17-september-2002-8648221.webp)
Jones V Toben (Includes Explanatory Memorandum) [2002] FCA 1150 (17 September 2002)
2/5/2019 Jones v Toben (includes explanatory memorandum) [2002] FCA 1150 (17 September 2002) Australasian Legal Information Institute Federal Court of Australia Jones v Toben (includes explanatory memorandum) [] FCA ( September ) Last Updated: September FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA [] FCA JONES v TOBEN EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM By this proceeding the applicant sought orders of the Court for the enforcement of determinations made by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission ("HREOC") on October . HREOC found that the respondent had engaged in conduct rendered unlawful by section C of the Racial Discrimination Act (Cth) ("the Racial Discrimination Act") by publishing on a website material that vilified Jews. The proceeding before the Court was finally determined on an application made by the applicant for summary judgment. The application for summary judgment was made approximately fourteen months after the proceeding was instituted in the Court. The Court has exercised its discretion to give judgment on the application for summary judgement because it was satisfied that the respondent was unwilling to co-operate with the Court and the applicant in bringing the proceeding to trial within an acceptable timeframe or at all. Although the respondent did not defend the application for summary judgment, the applicant was required to place evidence before the Court to justify the orders sought by him. The Court was satisfied on the evidence adduced by the applicant that the respondent, as director of the Adelaide Institute, has published material on the World Wide Web which is reasonably likely, in all of the circumstances, to offend, insult, humiliate and intimidate Jewish Australians or a group of Jewish Australians ("the offending material"). -
12.25.06 Holocaust Denial Laws and Other Legislation Criminalizing
12.25.06 Holocaust Denial Laws and Other Legislation Criminalizing Promotion of Nazism Prof. Michael J. Bazyler von Oppenheim Research Fellow International Institute for Holocaust Studies, Yad Vashem Professor of Law, Whittier Law School, California, USA www.michaelbazyler.com [email protected] I. Introduction As a result of the enormous suffering inflicted upon the world by the Nazi regime, and especially Europe, a number of European countries have enacted laws criminalizing both the denial of the Holocaust and the promotion of Nazi ideology. The aim of these laws is to prevent the resurrection of Nazism in Europe by stamping out at the earliest opportunity – or to use the phrase “to nip it in the bud” – any public reemergence of Nazi views, whether through speech, symbols, or public association. Individuals and groups today promoting Nazism, often called neo-Nazis, do not limit their ideology just to antisemitism. Part and parcel of their message also involves hatred of other minority groups, most often individuals of African, Arab and Asian descent, and immigrants from non-European nations. As a result, a number of the European laws banning neo-Nazi messages also ban racist and hate speech. Some also criminalize the denial of other genocides, most prominently the genocide of the Armenians. The anti-Nazi laws do not exist in every European country. Presently, the following European countries have some legislation criminalizing the Nazi message, including denial of the Holocaust: Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain and Switzerland. Holocaust denial is also illegal in Israel. -
Executive Council of Australian Jewry REPORT on ANTISEMITISM IN
Executive Council of Australian Jewry REPORT ON ANTISEMITISM IN AUSTRALIA 1 October 2007 – 30 September 2008 Researched and written by Jeremy Jones AM 2 THIS REPORT WAS WHOLLY RESEARCHED AND WRITTEN BY JEREMY JONES AM, TO ASSIST UNDERSTANDING OF ANTI-JEWISH VIOLENCE, VANDALISM, HARASSMENT AND PREJUDICE IN CONTEMPORARY AUSTRALIA Jeremy Jones is Director of International and Community Affairs, Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council and Honorary Life Member, Executive Council of Australian Jewry 146 Darlinghurst Road, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, AUSTRALIA Phone: +61 2 9360 5415 Facsimile: +61 2 9360 5416 E-mail: [email protected] November 2008 3 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 The Year in Review 5 1.2 Racism in Australia and Antisemitism 6 1.3 Forms of Antisemitism 7 2.0 COMMON THEMES IN ANTI-JEWISH RHETORIC 9 2.1 Introduction 9 2.2 “Jewish Power” 10 2.3 “International Jewish Conspiracy” 10 2.4 Holocaust Denial 11 2.5 Jewish/Nazi Analogy 12 2.6 Holocaust Denigration 12 2.7 Jews as “Un-Christian” and Judaism as “Anti-Christian” 13 2.8 Jewish Stereotypes 14 2.9 “Street” Antisemitism 14 2.10 The Effect of Vilification 14 3.0 INCIDENTS OF VIOLENCE, VANDALISM AND INTIMIDATION 17 3.1 Introduction 17 3.2 Reports for Year 1 October 2007 to 30 September 2008 17 3.3 Serious/Violent Incidents 18 3.4 Telephone Intimidation and Hate Mail 22 3.5 Graffiti 23 3.6 Hate Email 25 3.7 Leaflets, Posters and other Miscellaneous Harassment 27 4.0 ANTISEMITISM IN THE MEDIA AND THE COMMUNITY 29 4.1 Introduction 29 4.2 Political Parties 30 4.3 Mainstream Media 31