DOCSLIB.ORG

Antisemitism Report 2010 1 October 2009 – 30 September 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Executive Council of Australian Jewry Antisemitism Report 2010 1 October 2009 – 30 September 2010 THIS REPORT WAS WHOLLY RESEARCHED AND WRITTEN BY JEREMY JONES AM, TO ASSIST UNDERSTANDING OF ANTI-JEWISH VIOLENCE, VANDALISM, HARASSMENT AND PREJUDICE IN CONTEMPORARY AUSTRALIA Jeremy Jones is Director of International and Community Affairs, Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council and Honorary Life Member, Executive Council of Australian Jewry This document should not be reproduced or distributed, and the original work not quoted, without the express permission of the author. 140 William Street, East Sydney, NSW 2011, AUSTRALIA Phone: +61 2 9360 5415 Facsimile: +61 2 9360 5416 E-mail: [email protected] September 2010 REPORT ON ANTISEMITISM IN AUSTRALIA 1 October 2009– 30 September 2010 THIS REPORT WAS WHOLLY RESEARCHED AND WRITTEN BY JEREMY JONES AM, TO ASSIST UNDERSTANDING OF ANTI-JEWISH VIOLENCE, VANDALISM, HARASSMENT AND PREJUDICE IN CONTEMPORARY AUSTRALIA Jeremy Jones is Director of International and Community Affairs, Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council and Honorary Life Member, Executive Council of Australian Jewry This document should not be reproduced or distributed, and the original work not quoted, without the express permission of the author. 140 William Street, East Sydney, NSW 2011, AUSTRALIA Phone: +61 2 9360 5415 Facsimile: +61 2 9360 5416 E-mail: [email protected] November 2010 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 The Year in Review 3 1.2 Racism in Australia and Antisemitism 5 1.3 Forms of Antisemitism 6 2.0 COMMON THEMES IN ANTI-JEWISH RHETORIC 9 2.1 Introduction 9 2.2 ―Jewish Power‖ 10 2.3 ―International Jewish Conspiracy‖ 10 2.4 Holocaust Denial 11 2.5 Jewish/Nazi Analogy 13 2.6 Holocaust Denigration 13 2.7 Jews as ―Un-Christian‖ and Judaism as ―Anti-Christian‖ 14 2.8 Jewish Stereotypes 15 2.9 ―Street‖ Antisemitism 15 2.10 The Effect of Vilification 15 3.0 INCIDENTS OF VIOLENCE, VANDALISM AND INTIMIDATION 17 3.1 Introduction 17 3.2 Reports for Year 1 October 2008 to 30 September 2009 17 3.3 Serious/Violent Incidents 18 3.4 Telephone Intimidation and Hate Mail 21 3.5 Graffiti 22 3.6 Hate Email 23 3.7 Leaflets, Posters and other Miscellaneous Harassment 24 4.0 ANTISEMITISM IN THE MEDIA AND THE COMMUNITY 27 4.1 Introduction 27 4.2 Mainstream Society 31 1 4.3 Middle East Politics 39 5.0 MUSLIM AND ARAB SOURCES 44 6.0 THE LEFT 55 7.0 CHRISTIANITY 61 8.0 ON-LINE MEDIA 63 8.1 General Issues 63 8.2 Websites Based in Australia 64 8.3 Electronic E-Mail, Newsgroups, Lists and Clubs 67 9.0 ANTISEMITIC ORGANISATIONS AND PUBLICATIONS 70 9.1 Introduction 70 9.2 One Nation 73 9.3 The Australian League of Rights 75 9.4 Neo-Nazis/White Supremacists 76 9.5 The Adelaide Institute and Toben.biz 81 9.6 The Australian Civil Liberties Union 92 9.7 Bible Believers 92 9.8 The LaRouche Cult 97 9.9 Far Right ―Creativity‖ and Quasi-Christian ―Churches‖ 100 9.10 Miscellaneous Activists 104 9.11 ―New Age‖ Groups 109 10.0 RESPONSES TO ANTISEMITISM 110 10.1 Introduction 110 10.2 Political Leadership 110 10.3 Moral Leadership 111 10.4 Education 111 10.5 The Racial Hatred Act, 1995 113 10.6 State and Territory Anti-Racism Laws and Criminal Law 114 10.7 Media 114 7.7.1 The Australian Press Council 114 7.7.2 The Australian Broadcast Authority 114 7.7.3 Federation of Australian Commercial Television Stations 115 7.7.4 Right of Reply 115 10.8 Other Sanctions 115 APPENDIX 1 Report on Antisemitism in Australia 2009 116 APPENDIX 2 Selected Serious Incidents of Anti-Jewish Assaults and Harassment 1990-2010 121 APPENDIX 3 The Last Word: Transparency 126 APPENDIX 4 The Last Word: Community standards 128 APPENDIX 5 The Last Word: Bigotry's Facilitators 130 APPENDIX 6 The Last Word: Quick Off The Mark 132 APPENDIX 7ATTORNEY-GENERAL, HON ROBERT McCLELLAND MP SPEECH TO THE CYBER RACISM SUMMIT, SYDNEY, TUESDAY, 27 APRIL 2010 134 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Year in Review During recent years, there has been a great deal of discussion and debate internationally on a perceived rise in antisemitic prejudices and anti-Jewish activity. The end of the Cold War did not bring a new civility to inter civilisational dialogue, but has seen a flourishing of crude ethno-nationalisms, intensifying of racist rhetoric and, all too often, failure of political will to confront antisemitism. Serious historical and philosophical works have explored the tenuous place of Jews who identify as such in the New Europe, while distance in time and emotional estrangement from the Nazis‘ Genocide has allowed public discourse to be conducted in a manner almost unimaginable during the late 20th century. The constant stream of overt antisemitism from the Arab Middle East, as well as from other identifiably Moslem sources, has not been effectively countered. To some extent, it has been both tolerated and conscripted by sections of the political left who see themselves as engaged in struggles against some or all of the USA, capitalism, the legacy of colonialism or amorphous ―establishments‖. Antisemitism from far-right wing sources continued to be propagated and some traditional anti-Jewish tropes emerged with slight variations so as to appeal to contemporary audiences. While perceptions of the place of Israel in the international body politic plays some part in informing discussions relating to Jews and to antisemitism, it is a gross oversimplification to treat Israeli policies, Zionism or the relationship of Jews to Israel as the driving force or most compelling influence on this situation. Having been a participant in a number of international meetings, including the notorious NGO Forum at the United Nations‘ 2001 World Conference Against Racism, Asia/Pacific Regional Interfaith Dialogues, International Jewish-Muslim and Jewish-Christian dialogues and many formal discussions in Australia for more than twenty years, the author of this paper is well aware of the problems, dangers and challenges presented by individuals, organisations and some State actors who promote one or more antisemitic tropes to further local, national and even global political agendas, This Report considers the presence of antisemitism in Australia in 2010, which should be understood as a local phenomenon and also in a broader, international context. It also covers a distinct 12 month period, which also can be constructively contrasted with preceding reporting. In Australia, in 2010, to accuse any person or organisation of antisemitism is to allege that their behaviour is antisocial and unacceptable. Unlike in some contemporary societies, no one with aspirations to public credibility admits to holding antisemitic views or to associating with openly antisemitic organisations. Individuals and organisations associated with the political left who promote extreme anti-Israeli racism, which sometimes included offensive and gratuitous anti-Jewish imagery, are keen to assert that they are not antisemitic and even some far-right and neo-Nazi groups publicly profess to be "anti-Zionist" rather than anti- Jewish, although the material they distribute can give the lie to any such distinction. Promoters of often-crude anti-Jewish conspiracy theories, including Holocaust deniers who allege that the Holocaust is a Jewish confidence trick played on gullible Christians as one part of a raft of anti-Jewish slurs, generally claim they are only "researching" historical or topical subjects. 3 It is worthwhile, in any assessment of antisemitism in Australia today, to consider the observations of the Community Security Trust, the English experts on contemporary anti- Jewish activity and discourse. The Executive Summary of their ―Antisemitic Discourse in Britain in 2009‖ included these comments ― Explicit antisemitism about Jews is rare in mainstream British discourse. It is, however, disturbingly common for older antisemitic conspiracy themes to be evoked by modern depictions of ―Zionism‖ and ―Zionist‖. Antisemitism is a matter of concern for British Jews, and many other observers, but it does not prevent Jews from leading a full life as British citizens. Rhetoric against ―Zionism‖, ―Zionists‖ or ―pro-Israelis‖ is fostering hostility against British Jews and their representative bodies. In 2009, the Gaza conflict caused Israel to be compared to Nazi Germany and its supporters to be compared to Nazis. Previously a fringe phenomenon, the Nazi comparison is now widespread and also appears in mainstream media. This causes significant upset to Jews and is an antisemitic abuse of the memory of the Holocaust. The play “Seven Jewish Children” typified the emerging trend to depict Israel and Zionism as a mass Jewish psychological reaction to the trauma of the Holocaust. The ugliest medieval accusation, the Blood Libel, claiming that Jews steal children in order to use their blood, was strikingly revived in 2009. This feature of medieval village antisemitism now returned as a shocking example of antisemitic rumours in today‘s global village. Two senior journalists at The Independent newspaper wrote separately about the supposed power of America‘s ―Jewish‖ lobby. It is quite common for The Independent and Guardian newspapers, in particular, to depict a dominant US ―Zionist‖ lobby in America: which risks reflecting and encouraging antisemitic Jewish conspiracy allegations. The term ―criticism of Israel‖ continued to be used as a catch-all defence against the raising of Jewish concerns about antisemitic manifestations, public speakers, groups, websites, agitprop and other phenomena.‖ Much of this is reflected in Australian society. The period in review included the 2010 Federal Election, which passed without any notable change in the prevalence of antisemitic acts. Despite efforts by anti-Jewish groups and individuals, matters of specific concern to Australian Jewry, such as community security and funding support for Jewish education, were discussed publicly in a manner which was generally free of prejudice.
Recommended publications
  • Dear Prime Minister, We Note with Concern the Increasingly Violent

    Dear Prime Minister, We Note with Concern the Increasingly Violent

    Dear Prime Minister, We note with concern the increasingly violent rhetoric directed towards Julian Assange of WikiLeaks. “We should treat Mr Assange the same way as other high-value terrorist targets: Kill him,” writes conservative columnist Jeffrey T Kuhner in the Washington Times. William Kristol, former chief of staff to vice president Dan Quayle, asks, “Why can’t we use our various assets to harass, snatch or neutralize Julian Assange and his collaborators, wherever they are?” “Why isn’t Julian Assange dead?” writes the prominent US pundit Jonah Goldberg. “The CIA should have already killed Julian Assange,” says John Hawkins on the Right Wing News site. Sarah Palin, a likely presidential candidate, compares Assange to an Al Qaeda leader; Rick Santorum, former Pennsylvania senator and potential presidential contender, accuses Assange of “terrorism”. And so on and so forth. Such calls cannot be dismissed as bluster. Over the last decade, we have seen the normalisation of extrajudicial measures once unthinkable, from ‘extraordinary rendition’ (kidnapping) to ‘enhanced interrogation’ (torture). In that context, we now have grave concerns for Mr Assange’s wellbeing. Irrespective of the political controversies surrounding WikiLeaks, Mr Assange remains entitled to conduct his affairs in safety, and to receive procedural fairness in any legal proceedings against him. As is well known, Mr Assange is an Australian citizen. We therefore call upon you to condemn, on behalf of the Australian Government, calls for physical harm to be inflicted upon Mr Assange, and to state publicly that you will ensure Mr Assange receives the rights and protections to which he is entitled, irrespective of whether the unlawful threats against him come from individuals or states.
  • Holocaust-Denial Literature: a Fourth Bibliography

    Holocaust-Denial Literature: a Fourth Bibliography

    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research York College 2000 Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Fourth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki CUNY York College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/yc_pubs/25 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Fourth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki This bibliography is a supplement to three earlier ones published in the March 1994, Decem- ber 1996, and September 1998 issues of the Bulletin of Bibliography. During the intervening time. Holocaust revisionism has continued to be discussed both in the scholarly literature and in the mainstream press, especially owing to the libel lawsuit filed by David Irving against Deb- orah Lipstadt and Penguin Books. The Holocaust deniers, who prefer to call themselves “revi- sionists” in an attempt to gain scholarly legitimacy, have refused to go away and remain as vocal as ever— Bradley R. Smith has continued to send revisionist advertisements to college newspapers (including free issues of his new publication. The Revisionist), generating public- ity for his cause. Holocaust-denial, which will be used interchangeably with Holocaust revisionism in this bib- liography, is a body of literature that seeks to “prove” that the Jewish Holocaust did not hap- pen. Although individual revisionists may have different motives and beliefs, they all share at least one point: that there was no systematic attempt by Nazi Germany to exterminate Euro- pean Jewry.
  • Lorne Bair Rare Books, ABAA 661 Millwood Avenue, Ste 206 Winchester, Virginia USA 22601

    Lorne Bair Rare Books, ABAA 661 Millwood Avenue, Ste 206 Winchester, Virginia USA 22601

    LORNE BAIR RARE BOOKS CATALOG 26 Lorne Bair Rare Books, ABAA 661 Millwood Avenue, Ste 206 Winchester, Virginia USA 22601 (540) 665-0855 Email: [email protected] Website: www.lornebair.com TERMS All items are offered subject to prior sale. Unless prior arrangements have been made, payment is expected with or- der and may be made by check, money order, credit card (Visa, MasterCard, Discover, American Express), or direct transfer of funds (wire transfer or Paypal). Institutions may be billed. Returns will be accepted for any reason within ten days of receipt. ALL ITEMS are guaranteed to be as described. Any restorations, sophistications, or alterations have been noted. Autograph and manuscript material is guaranteed without conditions or restrictions, and may be returned at any time if shown not to be authentic. DOMESTIC SHIPPING is by USPS Priority Mail at the rate of $9.50 for the first item and $3 for each additional item. Overseas shipping will vary depending upon destination and weight; quotations can be supplied. Alternative carriers may be arranged. WE ARE MEMBERS of the ABAA (Antiquarian Bookseller’s Association of America) and ILAB (International League of Antiquarian Book- sellers) and adhere to those organizations’ strict standards of professionalism and ethics. CONTENTS OF THIS CATALOG _________________ AFRICAN AMERICANA Items 1-35 RADICAL & PROLETARIAN LITERATURE Items 36-97 SOCIAL & PROLETARIAN LITERATURE Items 98-156 ART & PHOTOGRAPHY Items 157-201 INDEX & REFERENCES PART 1: AFRICAN-AMERICAN HISTORY & LITERATURE 1. ANDREWS, Matthew Page Heyward Shepherd, Victim of Violence. [Harper’s Ferry?]: Heyward Shepherd Memorial Association, [1931]. First Edition. Slim 12mo (18.5cm.); original green printed card wrappers, yapp edges; 32pp.; photograph.
  • Holocaust Denial in Australia

    Holocaust Denial in Australia

    ABSTRACT This paper explores the nature of Holocaust denial in Australia. It does so through a study of the beliefs and activities of the three organizations for whom Holocaust denial is a central belief: the Australian League of Rights, the Australian Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and the Adelaide Institute. Their activities, their international ties, and their relationship with the broader racist Right in Australia is considered. The paper concludes by reflecting on the future directions and responses to Holocaust denial. INTRODUCTION The nature of Australian Holocaust denial organizations, their activities, and their place in broader far Right circles is different from denial organizations in other countries. This is explained by the dominant role of the Australian League of Rights in far Right politics, the civil liberties origins of the Australian Civil Liberties Union, the lack of sizeable neo- Nazi groups in Australia, and the dominance of anti-Aboriginal and anti- Asian issues on the far Right agenda. In addition, unlike many European countries where denial is explained as a response to their wartime collaboration with the Nazis, this motive does not exist in Australia which fought against the Nazis and her allies. Although Holocaust denial is a fringe activity in Australia, it has significantly increased over the last two decades with a concomitant growth in collaboration between Australian and overseas Holocaust deniers. This is not just a Jewish concern for Holocaust deniers have become a leading element within the racist Right with whom they share a common worldview. This is because in addition to their antisemitism, Australian Holocaust deniers expound racist and xenophobic policies and views.
  • Civic and Political Status

    Civic and Political Status

    Civic and Political Status CIVIL LIBERTIES HE PERIOD between July 1954 and the autumn of 1955 saw a marked im- Tprovement in the general attitude on civil liberties questions in the United States. Many factors contributed to this. A decreased fear of immi- nent war was accompanied by a calmer approach to internal policies. The absence of any evidence of new Communist penetration, either in govern- ment or in other fields, led to a widespread feeling that the danger from con- spiratorial Communist activity had declined. On the other hand, the pub- licity received by a number of cases in which security procedures had been patently misused led to an increased realization of the dangers arising from measures which departed from the spirit of the Bill of Rights. And there could be little doubt that the clash between Sen. Joseph R. McCarthy and the Army, followed by the report of the Senate Select Committee to Study Censure Charges (Watkins Committee) and the Senate censure vote (AMER- ICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK, 1955 [Vol. 56], p. 184-85), tended to bring the ap- proach generally described as "McCarthyism" into disrepute. Security Program The change was least noticeable in the legislative field, where it took the form of a decrease in new restrictive legislation rather than in the disap- perance of any already on the books. There was, however, a marked altera- tion in both the interests and the behavior of legislative investigating com- mittees. In the executive department, security procedures changed little, and injustices still appeared to be frequent. But when—as increasingly hap- pened—they were brought to public attention, there was a new readiness and even eagerness to remedy them.
  • A Body of Text: Physical Culture and the Marketing of Mobility

    A Body of Text: Physical Culture and the Marketing of Mobility

    A BODY OF TEXT: PHYSICAL CULTURE AND THE MARKETING OF MOBILITY by Andrea Dale Lapin B.A., Douglass College at Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey 1994 M.A., University of Pittsburgh 1998 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH THE KENNETH P. DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Andrea Dale Lapin It was defended on April 15, 2013 and approved by Jonathan Arac, PhD, Andrew W Mellon Professor, Department of English William Scott, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of English Brenton Malin, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Communication Thesis Director: Nancy Glazener, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of English ii Copyright © by Andrea Dale Lapin 2013 iii A BODY OF TEXT: PHYSICAL CULTURE AND THE MARKETING OF MOBILITY Andrea Dale Lapin, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2013 Drawing on Althusserian notions of ideology and Bourdieu’s understanding of bodily hexis, A Body of Text seeks to reframe Physical Culture as an artifact worthy of serious study, more complex and less reactionary than its beefcake-and-sentiment reputation might suggest. This dissertation addresses the story of Physical Culture magazine from three different perspectives, reading the magazine through lenses of media history, medical history and social context, in order to understand the ways in which class operated on and through the body. In contrast to nearly every other publication in the early twentieth century, Physical Culture suggested that class mobility was possible, and that success would naturally follow improvement of body and health.
  • The North American White Supremacist Movement: an Analysis Ofinternet Hate Web Sites

    The North American White Supremacist Movement: an Analysis Ofinternet Hate Web Sites

    wmTE SUPREMACIST HATE ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB "WWW.HATE.ORG" THE NORTH AMERICAN WIDTE SUPREMACIST MOVEMENT: AN ANALYSIS OF INTERNET HATE WEB SITES By ALLISON M. JONES, B.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School ofGraduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment ofthe Requirements for the Degree Master ofArts McMaster University © Copyright by Allison M. Jones, October 1999 MASTER OF ARTS (1999) McMASTER UNIVERSITY (Sociology) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: "www.hate.org" -- The North American White Supremacist Movement: An Analysis ofInternet Hate Web Sites AUTHOR: Allison M. Jones, B.A. (York University) SUPERVISOR: Professor V. Satzewich NUMBER OF PAGES: v, 220 ii Abstract This thesis is a qualitative study ofNorth American white supremacist organisations, and their Internet web sites. Major issues framing the discussion include identity and racism. The thesis takes into consideration Goffman's concepts of'impression management' and 'presentation ofself as they relate to the web site manifestations of 'white power' groups. The purpose ofthe study is to analyse how a sample ofwhite supremacist groups present themselves and their ideologies in the context ofthe World Wide Web, and what elements they use as a part oftheir 'performances', including text, phraseology, and images. Presentation ofselfintersects with racism in that many modern white supremacists use aspects ofthe 'new racism', 'coded language' and'rearticulation' in the attempt to make their fundamentally racist worldview more palatable to the mainstream. Impression management techniques are employed in a complex manner, in either a 'positive' or 'negative' sense. Used positively, methods may be employed to impress the audience with the 'rationality' ofthe arguments and ideas put forth by the web site creators.
  • Spring 2021 Rights Catalogue

    Spring 2021 Rights Catalogue

    SPRING 2021 RIGHTS CATALOGUE Zeitgeist Agency is a unique literary agency founded in 2009 with an international outlook. From our Sydney and Brussels offices, we represent writers from around the world including Australia, USA, UK, Europe, Russia, Turkey and China. Our catalogue includes bestsellers, the finest literary fiction, crime and thrillers, inspiring memoirs and thought-provoking non-fiction. We also represent picture books, middle grade and YA/crossover titles from around the world. We work directly with publishers in UK, Australia/NZ, France, Israel, Nordic region and the Baltic states. In other countries we rely on a network of 15 dedicated co-agents (see full list on the last page). Our passion is to connect writers, publishers and media across the globe. We hope you enjoy what we have to offer. Warm regards, Benython, Sharon and Thomasin Benython Oldfield Founding Director Australia Sharon Galant Level 1, 142 Smith Street Founding Director Europe Summer Hill, Sydney Rue E. Van Driessche 75 NSW, 2130 Australia 1050 Brussels, Belgium +61 2 8060 9715 Thomasin Chinnery +32 479 262 843 [email protected] Agent [email protected] Rue E. Van Driessche 75, 1050 Brussels, Belgium +32 474 055 696 [email protected] 2 FICTION pg. 4 Miss Eliza’s English Kitchen by Annabel Abbs pg. 5 Frieda: The Original Lady Chatterley by Annabel Abbs pg. 6 The Joyce Girl by Annabel Abbs pg. 7 Kukolka by Kristen Loesch pg. 8 Behind Their Backs by Haska Shyyan pg. 9 From Where I Fell by Susan Johnson pg. 10 Fancy Meeting You Here by Ali Berg and Michelle Kalus pg.
  • Election Preparation

    Election Preparation

    3 Election Preparation 3.1 The period between the calling of an election and polling day is a period of intense activity on the part of the AEC, political parties and candidates. This activity includes the formal requirements for calling the election and nominating candidates, as well as publicity and advertising. Notification of an election and election writs 3.2 The AEC raised concerns about a number of formalities, namely: how it is notified of a forthcoming election; its role in preparing election writs; and the method of certifying the names of the successful candidates on the writs.1 3.3 The following outlines the context in which these concerns arise, followed by consideration of the submissions on these points. The role of election writs in an election 3.4 An election writ is a legal document that ‘commands’ an electoral officer to hold an election, and specifies the dates for the close of rolls, the close of nominations, polling day and the return of that writ. 1 Submission (AEC, no. 147), pp. 9-11, Transcript of Evidence, 16 August 2002 (Mr A Becker), pp. EM68-70. 98 3.5 The provisions governing election writs are detailed in sections 12 and 32 of the Constitution, and Part XIII of the Electoral Act. The function of election writs and how they fit in to the stages of an election is described below.2 Determination of an election date 3.6 Under the Constitution, the Governor-General has the power to prorogue the Parliament and dissolve the House of Representatives.3 However, as a matter of convention, the Prime Minister determines when he or she wishes an election to be held, subject to the constitutional requirement that the term of the House of Representatives shall be a maximum of three years.4 It is the convention that the Prime Minister visit the Governor-General to request that an election be held on the date chosen by the Prime Minister.5 In 2001, the Prime Minister visited the Governor-General on Friday, 5 October, and announced the election date the same day.
  • Communism and the Australian Labour Movement 1920-1955

    Communism and the Australian Labour Movement 1920-1955

    Robin Gollan RevolutionariesGollan • and ReformistsRobin Communism has played a central part in Australian political nightmares for over half a century. Yet it has received scant serious attention comparable in scope and perspec­ tive with this work. This book places the Communist Party of Australia firmly in its political context, national and international, from the 1920s to the mid-1950s. It is important in its in­ sights into the general history of Australian radicalism; its contribution to Australian history, especially labour history; and its placing of radical Australian history in a Communism and the Australian Labour world context. It is written from the per­ spective of one who joined the Communist Movement 1920-1955 Party of Australia because it seemed the only party 'committed to the struggle for socialism and against fascism' and who left it because Robin Gollan this 'no longer seemed the case'. Its breadth, perceptiveness, and understanding com­ mend it to all people concerned w ith the con­ tinuing political struggles of the Right, the Left, and the Centre. Robin Gollan RevolutionariesGollan • and ReformistsRobin Communism has played a central part in Australian political nightmares for over half a century. Yet it has received scant serious attention comparable in scope and perspec­ tive with this work. This book places the Communist Party of Australia firmly in its political context, national and international, from the 1920s to the mid-1950s. It is important in its in­ sights into the general history of Australian radicalism; its contribution to Australian history, especially labour history; and its placing of radical Australian history in a Communism and the Australian Labour world context.
  • A Symposium Exploring Community Memory, Meaning and Pluralisation

    A Symposium Exploring Community Memory, Meaning and Pluralisation

    THE AUSTRALIAN SOCIETY OF ARCHIVISTS PRESENTS A SYMPOSIUM EXPLORING COMMUNITY MEMORY, MEANING AND PLURALISATION Thursday 20 October 2011 9.00 to 4.30pm Crystal Palace, Sydney’s Luna Park Milsons Point, Sydney Proudly sponsored by AUSTRALIAN SOCIETY OF ARCHIVISTS INC SYMPOSIUM PROGRAM THE AUSTRALIAN SOCIETY OF ARCHIVISTS PRESENTS ORDER OF PROCEEDINGS 8.00 – 8.50am Registration – venue foyer; tea/coffee 11.30am ‘Archiving the Sydney Opera House: a 2.50pm ‘Untold stories – Canberra’s Centenary drama in more than three acts’ opportunity’ 9.00am Welcome to Country Paul Bentley Dr David Headon 9.05am Symposium welcome, and welcome to SEssioN 2: IcoNic PEoplE 3.30pm Afternoon tea Keynote speaker Pat Jackson (ASA President) 12.00pm ‘Engaging with a national icon: The 3.55pm ‘WikiLeaks and the meaning of archives’ Matthew Flinders experience’ Cassie Findlay and Antony Loewenstein 9.15am Keynote address Paul Brunton Tim Bowden AM 4.25pm Introduction to Professor Nakata 12.30pm ‘Pitching the past – selling history to the Pat Jackson 9.45am Keynote speaker thank-you and welcome to media’ 4.30pm The Loris Williams Memorial Lecture Session 1 speakers Brad Argent Dr Louise Trott (ASA Councillor) Presented by the Australian Society of 1.00pm Questions and responses from the floor Archivists’ Indigenous Issues Special 9.50am SEssioN 1: IcoNic SpacES Interest Group 1.10pm Lunch ‘Are icons made or are they simply Professor Martin Nakata 1.50pm ‘From the Paper panopticon to Facebook promotional artefacts’ 5.00pm Symposium closing address - 21st Century uses
  • NOVEMBER 2012 Jazz History Is Made at Eubie Live!

    NOVEMBER 2012 Jazz History Is Made at Eubie Live!

    NOVEMBER 2012 Jazz History Is Made At Eubie Live! . 1 Joseph Howell: Jazz Clarinet Now . 3 John Coltrane Tribute Concert . 5 Sam King and Company Rule at Jazzway . 6 BALTIMORE JAZZ ALLIANCE Jazz Jam Sessions . 8 WEAA’s CD Pick of the Month . 9 BJA’s Redesigned Website Unveiled . 9 BJA Products and Discounts . 10 Ad Rates and Member Sign-up Form . 11 Cultural Happy Hour at Mark Cottman’s Gallery . 12 VOLUME IX ISSUE XI THE BJA NEWSLETTER WWW.BALTIMOREJAZZ.COM Jazz History Is Made At Eubie Live! he scariest thing about Hugh Masekela is that he almost gave up the trumpet. He had been playing for four years when he first listened to TClifford Brown, a trumpet king in the 1950s, and thought there was no hope for a boy from South Africa to blow a horn the way Brown could. Of course, more than half a century later, Masekela was the reason for more than a hundred people to crowd into the fourth floor of the Eubie Blake Center the evening of Oct. 21st, taking seats in overflow rows made up of metal chairs. He was joined on stage by good friend and legendary Charm City pianist, Larry Willis; the two of them, one trumpet, one piano, played a fifteen-tune set. As Masekela told showgoers early in the night, the music he and Willis were playing was what they had learned in the 1960s and 1970s. The duo first met at the Manhattan School of Music in the first half of the 1960s—where Willis had originally been a voice major singing opera and wearing powdered wigs that made him look like George Washington, so Masekela says.