DOCSLIB.ORG

Mm Arthropod and Nematode Parasites, Parasitoids, And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mm Arthropod and Nematode Parasites, Parasitoids, And ' - mm Arthropod and Nematode Parasites, Parasitoids, and Predators of Acrididae in America North of Mexico Technical Bulletin No. 1460 Agricultural Research Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ryyscji Arthropod and Nematode Parasites, Parasitoids, and Predators of Ácrididae in America North of Mexico >, ai,*' By N. E.|Rp)S^ Technical Bulletin No. 1460 Agricultural Research Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Washington, D.C. Issued March 1973 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington. D.C. 20402 — Price: $2.60 domestic postpaid, or $2.25 GPO Bookstore Stock Number 0100-2624 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I express my sincere thanks to the following indi- viduals: The coleopterists of the Systematic Entomol- ogy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, for checking the nomenclature of the Coleóptera ; George 0. Poinar, Jr., University of California, Berkeley, for his aid with the nematode section ; C. F. W. Muesebeck, U.S. National Museum, Washintgon, D.C., for advice on the Scelio ; A. S. Menke, Systematic Entomology Lab- oratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and R. M. Bohart, Entomology Department, University of Cali- fornia, Davis, for their assistance on the Tachytes; H. W. Prescott, Forest Grove, Oreg., for advice on the Nemestrinidae ; J. E. Henry, Grasshopper Investigation Laboratory, U. S. Department of Agriculture, for life information of Goniopsita oohaga ; W. F. Barr, Depart- ment of Entomology, University of Idaho, and R. L. Lavigne, Department of Entomology, University of Wyoming, for their assistance with the Asilidae. I also give my special appreciation to C. C. Blickenstaff, Grasshopper Investigation Laboratory, U.S. Depart- ment of Agriculture, for his advice and counsel. The maps are reproduced by permission of Denoyer- Geppert©. CONTENTS Pase Key to orders and families of larval parasites and predators.- 4 Key to orders and families of adult parasites and predators - 6 Grasshopper parasites and parasitoids '^ 9 Diptera Anthomyiidae ^ Calliphoridae ^^ Nemestrinidae ^^ Sarcophagidae ^^ Tachinidae ^^ Hymenoptera 77* ' Scelionidae "" Internal parasites °^ Nematoda |^ Mermithidae ^^ Gordiacea ^^ External parasites ^^ Hymenoptera ^^ Sphecidae ^^ Acariña Hyperparasitoids ^^° Hymenoptera ^^^ Bracomdae ^^"^ Chalcidae ^^^ Perilampidae ^^^ Pteromalidae ^^^ Sphecidae . 1^^ Diptera JJJ Calliphoridae ^^^ Predators ^^^ Coleóptera ^^^ Carabidae ^^^ Cicindelidae 1^2 Cantharidae ^'^^ Meloidae ^'^^ Diptera ^12 Anthomyiidae 212 Asilidae 215 Bombyliidae- 241 Chloropidae 248 Therevidae 250 Hymenoptera 253 Formicidae 253 Araneida 259 References 261 Index 286 IV Arthropod and Nematode Parasites, Parasitoids, and Predators of Acrididae in America North of Mexico By N. E. REES, entomologist, Grasshopper Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Bozeman, Mont. This bulletin includes all avail- scriptions in the references listed able information relating to ar- at the end of this bulletin. thropod and nematode parasites The date and page numbers and predators of grasshoppers under the species name in each that occur in the United States section refer to the original de- and Canada. Although the litera- scription. In parentheses preced- ture was the main source of infor- ing the date is the original mation, some data were obtained generic name. Thus from unpublished records of the Blaesoxipha reversa (Aldrich) U.S. Department of Agriculture's (Sarcophaga) 1916: 135-136 Grasshopper Investigations Lab- was described by Aldrich as Sar- oratory at Bozeman, Mont. Parts cophaga reversa on pages 135 and of these records are from near 136 of his 1916 publication. Sacramento, Calif., and are re- Italic numbers in parentheses lated to a period prior to the in the text indicate the source in establishment of the Bozeman the reference list where informa- laboratory. tion is given about the species Each species is treated sepa- under discussion. Thus, for ex- rately. Insofar as possible, ample, (307, p. 233) refers to page information includes accepted 233 of R. W. Smith's 1958 article, nomenclature and synonyms, geo- which contains information on graphical distribution, host spe- Blaesoxipha reversa. This will en- cies, life history and habits, and able the reader to refer only to the descriptions of the egg, larval, pertinent part of an original pupal, and adult stages. The brief article. descriptions of the various stages For brevity, the following are presented only to aid the abbreviations are used: SO = reader in tentative identification. seasonal occurrence (dates given For a more thorough understand- here generally indicate the ing of each species, he is directed earliest appearance of each life to the original or subsequent de- stage in the field but not the dura- TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 1460, U. S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE tion of the stage unless so stated. menclature for the Diptera, and Several widely separated dates Agriculture Monograph 2, "Hy- often indicate several generations menoptera of America North of per year). LOD = length of de- Mexico," 1951, plus its supple- velopment of each stage (these ments, was the source for the are generally the results of lab- Hymenoptera. Later publications oratory investigations). OWS = and personal correspondence were overwintering stage (and location utilized for the accepted nomen- when known). G/Y = generations clature for the Coleóptera, Mer- per year or per given number of mithidae, mites, and spiders. years. SA = stage attacked (the They are also included in the ref- development stage of the prey or erence list. host that is utilized). N/H = Since the information was ob- number per host (number of tained from many sources, several parasites living at one time within points should be stressed. a single host, or the number of (1) Distributional records are prey utilized per day per pred- often few in number or for scat- ator). MOA — method of attack tered locations. It is therefore (method of parasitizing a host or highly probable that many species obtaining prey). AF — food taken listed here occupy broader ranges by the adult parasite or predator than recorded but with gaps cre- and includes plants frequented ated by sites of unfavorable en- that may or may not be eaten. vironment. Therefore the distri- HAB — habitat of the parasite or butional maps are generalized, predator. indicating the Provinces and The term "unknown" indicates States occupied by each species, that I believe no work has been and are not intended to show that conducted on this particular species distribution ends at Prov- phase. The term "not given" ince or State boundaries. means that although no mention (2) Figures given for incidence of an event was located in the of parasitism and prédation may literature, it is probably known be misleading. These generally by those working with that spe- represent the level of parasitism cies and probably conforms to and prédation at a given time and the general statement for the place and do not indicate the total family. The term "not located" effect on the host population. means that I believe the informa- (3) Seasonal occurrence rec- tion to be in print, but it was not ords are as given for the location located in my search. reported and may deviate as much Agriculture Handbook 276, "A as a month in other locations. Catalog of the Diptera of Ameri- (4) The amount of information can North of Mexico," 1965, was available indicates the amount of the main source of accepted no- work conducted on a species, but ARTHROPOD AND NEMATODE PARASITES IN AMERICA it does not present an accurate insects), incomplete descriptions, indication of its effect on grass- and because predators are less hopper populations. An investi- likely to be taken with their prey. gator's interest and location or the Such a key is impractical here. importance of a certain species Generally several references to for other economic reasons is adult descriptions are included at often responsible for where a the end of this bulletin for those study is concentrated. who wish a more complete de- Keys to orders and families are scription. References to articles greatly simplified and designed to that quote original statements are lead the reader to the correct also included, since these may be group. He must then rely on a more easily obtained than the combination of information to ar- original. Even so, not all tax- rive at the correct species. onomic articles have been listed To effectively utilize the para- here because of nonavailability, site larval key, the larvae should superfluous repetition of the sub- be taken from the host. In sim- ject, and, of course, some articles plifying the keys for use by non- may have escaped the literature taxonomists, many details were search. omitted. These details might be In addition to the insects de- needed in separating nonparasitic scribed here, others could be in- species from parasitic ones, but cluded but are only mentioned they can be disregarded if the here. I have observed several reader is certain of the parasitic species of dragonflies taking both nature of the species involved. nymphal and adult grasshoppers. With some species, difficult taxo- At least one hemipteran, probably nomic characters had to be re- Reduviidae, was observed sucking tained and these are diagramed the body juices from an adult at appropriate places in the text. Melanoplus sanguinipes (F.). On In only a few groups are parasite several occasions mosquitoes were larval descriptions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Acridiidae of Minnesota
    Wqt 1lluitttr11ity nf :!alliuur11nta AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION BULLETIN 141 TECHNICAL THE ACRIDIIDAE OF MINNESOTA BY M. P. SOMES DIVISION OF ENTOMOLOGY UNIVERSITY FARM, ST. PAUL. JULY 1914 THE UNIVERSlTY OF l\ll.'\1\ESOTA THE 130ARD OF REGENTS The Hon. B. F. :.JELsox, '\finneapolis, President of the Board - 1916 GEORGE EDGAR VINCENT, Minneapolis Ex Officio The President of the l.:niversity The Hon. ADOLPH 0. EBERHART, Mankato Ex Officio The Governor of the State The Hon. C. G. ScnuLZ, St. Paul l'.x Oflicio The Superintendent of Education The Hon. A. E. RICE, \Villmar 191.3 The Hon. CH.\RLES L. Sol\DfERS, St. Paul - 1915 The Hon. PIERCE Bun.ER, St. Paul 1916 The Hon. FRED B. SNYDER, Minneapolis 1916 The Hon. W. J. J\Lwo, Rochester 1919 The Hon. MILTON M. \NILLIAMS, Little Falls 1919 The Hon. }OIIN G. vVILLIAMS, Duluth 1920 The Hon. GEORGE H. PARTRIDGE, Minneapolis 1920 Tl-IE AGRICULTURAL C0:\1MITTEE The Hon. A. E. RrCE, Chairman The Hon. MILTON M. vVILLIAMS The Hon. C. G. SCHULZ President GEORGE E. VINCENT The Hon. JoHN G. \VrLLIAMS STATION STAFF A. F. VlooDs, M.A., D.Agr., Director J. 0. RANKIN, M.A.. Editor HARRIET 'vV. SEWALL, B.A., Librarian T. J. HORTON, Photographer T. L.' HAECKER, Dairy and Animal Husbandman M. H. REYNOLDS, B.S.A., M.D., D.V.:'d., Veterinarian ANDREW Boss, Agriculturist F. L. WASHBURN, M.A., Entomologist E. M. FREEMAN, Ph.D., Plant Pathologist and Botanist JonN T. STEWART, C.E., Agricultural Engineer R. W. THATCHER, M.A., Agricultural Chemist F. J.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Vision in Band-Winged Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Oedipodinae)
    Spatial vision in band-winged grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Oedipodinae) A Senior Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Department of Organismal Biology and Ecology, Colorado College By Alexander B. Duncan Bachelor of Arts Degree in Organismal Biology and Ecology May, 2017 Approved by: _________________________________________ Dr. Nicholas Brandley Primary Thesis Advisor ________________________________________ Dr. Emilie Gray Secondary Thesis Advisor ABSTRACT Visual acuity, the ability to resolve fine spatial details, can vary dramatically between and within insect species. Body-size, sex, behavior, and ecological niche are all factors that may influence an insect’s acuity. Band-winged grasshoppers (Oedipodinae) are a subfamily of grasshoppers characterized by their colorfully patterned hindwings. Although researchers have anecdotally suggested that this color pattern may attract mates, few studies have examined the visual acuity of these animals, and none have examined its implications on intraspecific signaling. Here, we compare the visual acuity of three bandwing species: Dissosteira carolina, Arphia pseudonietana, and Spharagemon equale. To measure acuity in these species we used a modified radius of curvature estimation (RCE) technique. Visual acuity was significantly coarser 1) in males compared to females, 2) parallel to the horizon compared to the perpendicular, and 3) in S. equale compared to other bandwings. Unlike many insect families, body size within a species did not correlate with visual acuity. To examine the functional implications of these results, we modeled the appearance of different bandwing patterns to conspecifics. These results suggest that hind- wing patterning could only be used as a signal to conspecifics at short distances (<50cm). This study furthers the exploration of behavior and the evolution of visual systems in bandwings.
    [Show full text]
  • Niche Breadth and Feeding in Tropical Grasshoppers
    ar ,? ,* 4 ’ Insect Sci. Applic. Vol. 12, No. 11213, pp. 201-208, 1991 0191-9040/91 $3.00 + 0.00 Printed in Kenya. All rights reserved O 1991 ICIPE-ICIPE Science Press NICHE BREADTH AND FEEDING IN TROPICAL GRASSHOPPERS LE GALL PHILIPPE* ORSTOM, Institut Français de Recherches pour le Développement en Co-operation, _-Laboratoire d’Entomologie Bt 446, UniversitC Paris-Sud Orsay, 914105, Orsay (-./.- (Received 30 October 1990) Abstract-Consumption indices and apparent digestibility are measured for seven species of grasshoppers from Lamto (Ivory Coast), representative of different trophic specialization steps (Le Gall and Gillon, 1989). The consumption indices vary from 0.11 to 0.34 and the apparent digestibility from 30 to 65%. Specialists are not more efficient on their host plant than are generalists on convenient host plants, but some specialists fed on plants which are not convenient for generalists. Anthermus granosus and Eucoptacra spathulacauda feeding on Lippia multiflora is not convenient for a generalist like Eucoptera anguliflava. If feeding efficiency does not seem to be a real selective pressure, it can be an important step in specialization processes, when there is an adaptation to an unusable host plant for polyphagous species. Differences in the constitution of plant parts eaten by the grasshopper play an important role in the digestibility. The differences in the efficiency observed between the two specialists of Lippia are from their differences in feeding behaviour. Key Words: Grasshoppers, Orthoptera, Acrididae, Africa, plant-insects relationships, ecology, digestibility Résumé-Une Btude a été faite sur la consom’mation et la digestibilité apparente chez 7 espèces de sauterelles à Lamto (Côte d’Ivoire) représentant différents elements de spécialisation alimentaire (Le Gall et Gillon, 1989).
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondrial Genomes Resolve the Phylogeny of Adephaga
    1 Mitochondrial genomes resolve the phylogeny 2 of Adephaga (Coleoptera) and confirm tiger 3 beetles (Cicindelidae) as an independent family 4 Alejandro López-López1,2,3 and Alfried P. Vogler1,2 5 1: Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK 6 2: Department of Life Sciences, Silwood Park Campus, Imperial College London, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK 7 3: Departamento de Zoología y Antropología Física, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia, Campus 8 Mare Nostrum, 30100, Murcia, Spain 9 10 Corresponding author: Alejandro López-López ([email protected]) 11 12 Abstract 13 The beetle suborder Adephaga consists of several aquatic (‘Hydradephaga’) and terrestrial 14 (‘Geadephaga’) families whose relationships remain poorly known. In particular, the position 15 of Cicindelidae (tiger beetles) appears problematic, as recent studies have found them either 16 within the Hydradephaga based on mitogenomes, or together with several unlikely relatives 17 in Geadeadephaga based on 18S rRNA genes. We newly sequenced nine mitogenomes of 18 representatives of Cicindelidae and three ground beetles (Carabidae), and conducted 19 phylogenetic analyses together with 29 existing mitogenomes of Adephaga. Our results 20 support a basal split of Geadephaga and Hydradephaga, and reveal Cicindelidae, together 21 with Trachypachidae, as sister to all other Geadephaga, supporting their status as Family. We 22 show that alternative arrangements of basal adephagan relationships coincide with increased 23 rates of evolutionary change and with nucleotide compositional bias, but these confounding 24 factors were overcome by the CAT-Poisson model of PhyloBayes. The mitogenome + 18S 25 rRNA combined matrix supports the same topology only after removal of the hypervariable 26 expansion segments.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016
    Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016 April 1981 Revised, May 1982 2nd revision, April 1983 3rd revision, December 1999 4th revision, May 2011 Prepared for U.S. Department of Commerce Ohio Department of Natural Resources National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Division of Wildlife Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. G Estuarine Reserves Division Columbus, Ohio 1305 East West Highway 43229-6693 Silver Spring, MD 20910 This management plan has been developed in accordance with NOAA regulations, including all provisions for public involvement. It is consistent with the congressional intent of Section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, and the provisions of the Ohio Coastal Management Program. OWC NERR Management Plan, 2011 - 2016 Acknowledgements This management plan was prepared by the staff and Advisory Council of the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve (OWC NERR), in collaboration with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources-Division of Wildlife. Participants in the planning process included: Manager, Frank Lopez; Research Coordinator, Dr. David Klarer; Coastal Training Program Coordinator, Heather Elmer; Education Coordinator, Ann Keefe; Education Specialist Phoebe Van Zoest; and Office Assistant, Gloria Pasterak. Other Reserve staff including Dick Boyer and Marje Bernhardt contributed their expertise to numerous planning meetings. The Reserve is grateful for the input and recommendations provided by members of the Old Woman Creek NERR Advisory Council. The Reserve is appreciative of the review, guidance, and council of Division of Wildlife Executive Administrator Dave Scott and the mapping expertise of Keith Lott and the late Steve Barry.
    [Show full text]
  • (Raats) for Management of Grasshoppers on South Dakota Rangeland, 1997-1999
    Field and Economic Evaluation of Operational Scale Reduced Agent and Reduced Area Treatments (RAATs) for Management of Grasshoppers on South Dakota Rangeland, 1997-1999 R. Nelson Foster1, K. Chris Reuter1, K. Fridley2, D. Kurtenbach2, R. Flakus2, R. Bohls3, B. Radsick4, J. B. Helbig5, A. Wagner2 and L. Jech6 1Phoenix Plant Protection Center United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 3645 E. Wier Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85040 2South Dakota Department of Agriculture 523 E. Capitol Ave. Foss Bldg. Pierre, SD 57501-3182 31123 St. Charles St. Rapid City, SD 57701 4Aircraft and Equipment Operations United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Moore Air Field Mission, TX 5Plant Protection and Quarantine United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service P.O. Box 250 Pierre, SD 57501-0250 611416 West Hidalgo Tolleson, AZ 85353 1 Abstract Strategies that utilize lower than traditional doses of insecticides in combination with swaths of applied insecticide that leave untreated areas between each swath are one way to significantly reduce the cost of controlling grasshoppers on rangeland. By leaving untreated areas, this strategy provides reserves for naturally occurring biological control agents and facilitates an economical integrated management approach for dealing with damaging populations of grasshoppers on rangeland. This three year study was conducted in different locations and years to develop and demonstrate on a large scale operational level, the utility of reduced area / agent treatments (RAATs) for significantly reducing costs to manage damaging populations of grasshoppers. In 1997 these reduced agent/area treatments (RAATs) resulted in about 15% lower mortality than traditional treatments while reducing pesticide use and cost by 60% with malathion and 75% with carbaryl.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthoptera, Acrididae) from Japan
    C 2000 The Japan Mendel Society Cytologia 65:351-358, 2000 C-Banded Karyotypes of Some Podisminae Grasshoppers (Orthoptera, Acrididae) from Japan Alexander G. Bugrov1,*, Elzbieta Warchalowska-Sliwa2, Gen lto3 and Sin-ichi Akimoto3 1 Novosibirsk State University, 630090 Novosibirsk and Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 630091 Novosibirsk, Russia 2 Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, 31-016 Krakow, Poland 3 Hokkaido University, Faculty of Agriculture, Sapporo, 060-8589 Japan Accepted February 24, 2000 Summary C-banding patterns in Japanese grasshoppers belonging to the subfamily Podisminae: Podisma sapporensis Shiraki (2n •‰=23, NF=23), Parapodisma subastris Huang, Parapodisma ten- ryuensis Kobayashi, Parapodisma yamato Tominaga et Storozhenko, Parapodisma mikado (I. Boli- var), Fruhstorferiola okinawaensis (Shiraki) (2n d=21, NF =21), and Sinopodisma punctata Mist- shenko (2nd = 21, all chromosomes are two-armed) were studied. Cytogenetic similarities and differ- ences between particular species are discussed using the C-banding method. Key words Podisminae grasshoppers, Chromosome, Karyotype, C-banding. Karyotypes of 8 species of grasshopper belonging to the subfamily Podisminae have been de- scribed from Japan (Inoue 1985). However, the C-banding technique was not commonly used in the cytogenetic studies of Japanese Podisminae. Nevertheless, it has been used extensively with Or- thoptera to discriminate individual chromosomes and their behaviour during meiosis (Gosalvez et al. 1997). The application of this technique has produced new cytogenetic markers for comparative karyology of Podisminae (Westerman and Hewitt 1985, Bugrov et al. 1994, Bugrov 1995, Bugrov and Sergeev 1997). Moreover, the C-banding method gives information about the rates and features of chromosome evolution in groups of closely related species (Cabrero and Camacho 1986).
    [Show full text]
  • Insects and Molluscs, According to the Procedures Outlined Below
    Bush Blitz – ACT Expedition 26 Nov – 6 Dec 2018 ACT Expedition Bush Blitz Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, Orthoptera, Terrestrial molluscs 26 Nov – 6 Dec 2018 Submitted: 5 April 2019 Debbie Jennings and Olivia Evangelista Nomenclature and taxonomy used in this report is consistent with: The Australian Faunal Directory (AFD) http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/online-resources/fauna/afd/home Page 1 of 43 Bush Blitz – ACT Expedition 26 Nov – 6 Dec 2018 Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................. 2 List of contributors ................................................................................................................... 3 Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 2. Methods .......................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Site selection ............................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Survey techniques ..................................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Methods used at standard survey sites ................................................................... 7 2.3 Identifying
    [Show full text]
  • Orthoptera: Acrididae) from Five Southeastern States
    6: 115-118 Midsouth Entomologist ISSN: 1936-6019 www.midsouthentomologist.org.msstate.edu Report Noteworthy Collections of Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) From Five Southeastern States. JoVonn G. Hill Mississippi Entomological Museum, Department of Molecular Biology, Entomology, and Plant Pathology Mississippi State University, BOX 9775, Mississippi State, Mississippi [email protected] Abstract: Noteworthy collections for nine grasshopper species from Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, and Mississippi are presented along with a statement of their significance. Key Words: Acrididae, Boopedon, Eotettix, Dendrotettix, Melanoplus, Spharagemon Received: 10-X-2013 Accepted: 16-XII-2013 Introduction In a preliminary list of the grasshoppers of the southeastern United States, Hill and Dakin (2011) reported 160 grasshopper species group names and the states in which they occur in. Since then Otte (2012) and Hill (In press) have described seven and two new species of Melanoplus from the region respectively. As part of an ongoing survey of the grasshopper fauna of the southeastern United States, increasingly refined species distribution information is being compiled. In the process, noteworthy collections have been made representing the first documentation of nine species for the first time from five states. These new state records are reported below. An up to date listing for each southeastern state can be found at the Grasshoppers of the Southeastern U.S.A webpage: http://mississippientomologicalmuseum.org.msstate.edu/Researchtaxapages/Orthoptera/Acrididaepages/ Acridid.intro.htm. Results and Discussion Alabama Melanoplus davisi Hebard: Covington Co., 4 mi NNW Red Level, 31º27'44"N 86º38'52"W, 12 September 2013, J.G. Hill, sandhill, (1♂). Melanoplus pygmaeus Davis: Baldwin Co., Bon Secour National Wildlife Refuge, 29 October 2009, J.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Oestroidea) Magdi S
    El-Hawagry Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control (2018) 28:46 Egyptian Journal of https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-018-0042-3 Biological Pest Control RESEARCH Open Access Catalogue of the Tachinidae of Egypt (Diptera: Oestroidea) Magdi S. El-Hawagry Abstract Tachinid flies are an important group of parasitoids in their larval stage, and all their hosts are of the Arthropoda, almost exclusively other insects, including important insect pests in agriculture and forestry. All known Egyptian taxa of the family Tachinidae are systematically catalogued. Synonymies, type localities, type depositories, world distributions by biogeographic realm(s) and country, Egyptian localities, and dates of collection are provided. A total of 72 tachinid species belonging to 42 genera, 15 tribes, and 4 subfamilies has been treated. Keywords: Tachinid flies, Egyptian taxa, World distribution, Egyptian localities, Dates of collection Background agriculture and forestry. They typically parasitize phytopha- Tachinidae are a large and cosmopolitan family of flies gous larvae of Lepidoptera and Coleoptera or nymphs of within the superfamily Oestroidea. It is the second largest Hemiptera and Orthoptera. Consequently, tachinid flies family in the order Diptera (Irwin et al. 2003), with some have been successfully applied in programs of biological 1500 recognized genera (O’Hara 2016) and more than control against different insect pests (Stireman et al. 2006; 8500 described species (O’Hara 2013) worldwide. How- O’Hara 2008 and Cerretti and Tschorsnig 2010). ever, the estimated true diversity of the family is probably No comprehensive taxonomic studies on the family double the number of the currently known species, mak- Tachinidae have been carried out in Egypt before.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Capture and Management of Digital Zoological Names Information Francisco W
    Guidelines for the Capture and Management of Digital Zoological Names Information Francisco W. Welter-Schultes Version 1.1 March 2013 Suggested citation: Welter-Schultes, F.W. (2012). Guidelines for the capture and management of digital zoological names information. Version 1.1 released on March 2013. Copenhagen: Global Biodiversity Information Facility, 126 pp, ISBN: 87-92020-44-5, accessible online at http://www.gbif.org/orc/?doc_id=2784. ISBN: 87-92020-44-5 (10 digits), 978-87-92020-44-4 (13 digits). Persistent URI: http://www.gbif.org/orc/?doc_id=2784. Language: English. Copyright © F. W. Welter-Schultes & Global Biodiversity Information Facility, 2012. Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and opinions presented in this publication are those of the author and do not represent those of GBIF. License: This document is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0. Document Control: Version Description Date of release Author(s) 0.1 First complete draft. January 2012 F. W. Welter- Schultes 0.2 Document re-structured to improve February 2012 F. W. Welter- usability. Available for public Schultes & A. review. González-Talaván 1.0 First public version of the June 2012 F. W. Welter- document. Schultes 1.1 Minor editions March 2013 F. W. Welter- Schultes Cover Credit: GBIF Secretariat, 2012. Image by Levi Szekeres (Romania), obtained by stock.xchng (http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1389360). March 2013 ii Guidelines for the management of digital zoological names information Version 1.1 Table of Contents How to use this book ......................................................................... 1 SECTION I 1. Introduction ................................................................................ 2 1.1. Identifiers and the role of Linnean names ......................................... 2 1.1.1 Identifiers ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Checklist of the Orthopteroid Insects (Blattodea, Mantodea, Phasmatodea,Orthoptera) of Texas
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida March 2001 Preliminary checklist of the orthopteroid insects (Blattodea, Mantodea, Phasmatodea,Orthoptera) of Texas John A. Stidham Garland, TX Thomas A. Stidham University of California, Berkeley, CA Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Stidham, John A. and Stidham, Thomas A., "Preliminary checklist of the orthopteroid insects (Blattodea, Mantodea, Phasmatodea,Orthoptera) of Texas" (2001). Insecta Mundi. 180. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/180 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 15, No. 1, March, 2001 35 Preliminary checklist of the orthopteroid insects (Blattodea, Mantodea, Phasmatodea,Orthoptera) of Texas John A. Stidham 301 Pebble Creek Dr., Garland, TX 75040 and Thomas A. Stidham Department of Integrative Biology, Museum of Paleontology, and Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, Abstract: Texas has one of the most diverse orthopteroid assemblages of any state in the United States, reflecting the varied habitats found in the state. Three hundred and eighty-nine species and 78 subspecies of orthopteroid insects (Blattodea, Mantodea, Phasmatodea, and Orthoptera) have published records for the state of Texas. This is the first such comprehensive checklist for Texas and should aid future work on these groups in this area. Introduction (Flook and Rowell, 1997).
    [Show full text]