Orthoptera, Acrididae) from Japan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Orthoptera, Acrididae) from Japan C 2000 The Japan Mendel Society Cytologia 65:351-358, 2000 C-Banded Karyotypes of Some Podisminae Grasshoppers (Orthoptera, Acrididae) from Japan Alexander G. Bugrov1,*, Elzbieta Warchalowska-Sliwa2, Gen lto3 and Sin-ichi Akimoto3 1 Novosibirsk State University, 630090 Novosibirsk and Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 630091 Novosibirsk, Russia 2 Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, 31-016 Krakow, Poland 3 Hokkaido University, Faculty of Agriculture, Sapporo, 060-8589 Japan Accepted February 24, 2000 Summary C-banding patterns in Japanese grasshoppers belonging to the subfamily Podisminae: Podisma sapporensis Shiraki (2n •‰=23, NF=23), Parapodisma subastris Huang, Parapodisma ten- ryuensis Kobayashi, Parapodisma yamato Tominaga et Storozhenko, Parapodisma mikado (I. Boli- var), Fruhstorferiola okinawaensis (Shiraki) (2n d=21, NF =21), and Sinopodisma punctata Mist- shenko (2nd = 21, all chromosomes are two-armed) were studied. Cytogenetic similarities and differ- ences between particular species are discussed using the C-banding method. Key words Podisminae grasshoppers, Chromosome, Karyotype, C-banding. Karyotypes of 8 species of grasshopper belonging to the subfamily Podisminae have been de- scribed from Japan (Inoue 1985). However, the C-banding technique was not commonly used in the cytogenetic studies of Japanese Podisminae. Nevertheless, it has been used extensively with Or- thoptera to discriminate individual chromosomes and their behaviour during meiosis (Gosalvez et al. 1997). The application of this technique has produced new cytogenetic markers for comparative karyology of Podisminae (Westerman and Hewitt 1985, Bugrov et al. 1994, Bugrov 1995, Bugrov and Sergeev 1997). Moreover, the C-banding method gives information about the rates and features of chromosome evolution in groups of closely related species (Cabrero and Camacho 1986). It is important especially for the groups with geographically limited areas of distribution as, for exam- ple, the genus Parapodisma Mistshenko. The aim of the present work was to study unknown karyotypes and C-banding features of some Podisminae species from Japan. Material and methods Seven species of Podisminae belonging to the fauna of Japan were studied (Table 1) . Male insects were injected with 0.1% colchicine for 1.5-2 h. The testes were fixed in glacial acetic alcohol (1 : 3), and kept in 70% ethanol. Air dried preparations were made by squashing the testicles in 45% acetic acid and freezing them in dry ice. They were then stained with C-banding by treating with 0.2 N HCl for 15-20 min, immersed in a saturated solution of Ba(OH)2 at 61•Ž for 3-5 min, rinsed in water, immersed in 2•~ SSC at 61•Ž for 60 min , rinsed, air-dried, and stained with 2% Giemsa. Each portion of the eggs was stored in a separate Petri dish with moist sand and kept in an in- cubator at room temperature. After 15-20 days of incubation, the eggs were placed in a solution of 0.05% colchicine in insect saline and the tops of the nonmicropylar end were removed . They were then incubated at 30•Ž for 1.5-2 h. The embryos were then dissected out of the eggs into 0.9% * Corresponding author . 352 A. G. Bugrov et al. Cytologia 65 Table 1. List of taxa and collection localities sodium citrate solution for 20-30 min at room temperature prior to fixation in glacial acetic alcohol (1 : 3) and air-dried squashed preparations were made. They were stained using the C-method simi- lar to that for testicles, with minor modifications. Results Podisma sapporensis Shiraki. The chromosome complement of P. sapporensis from the popu- lation under study consists of 2n d= 23. All autosomes are acrocentric and can be divided into 3 size groups: 2 long (L1, L2), 6 medium (M3—M8), and 3 short (S9—S11). The size of the acrocentric X chromosome is approximately similar to the M4 pair. The paracentromeric C-blocks occur in all chromosomes of the complement, their size varying among autosome pairs. The M4 and M9 pairs of autosomes were characterised by the presence of distal C-bands. Additionally, the S9 pair of auto- somes has an interstitial C-band between the paracentromeric and telomeric C-blocks (Fig. la). In a few males the X chromosome has in addition to the centromeric C-band a minute interstitial C-band near the paracentromeric one (Fig. lb). In the prophase of meiosis the long autosomes form 2-4 chiasmata, medium-1-2, and the short autosome only one chiasma. The mean frequency of chias- mata on a cell is .X=17.64 (-±1.18). Parapodisma subastris Huang. 2n •‰=21. All chromosomes are acrocentric. They may be di- vided into three size groups; 2 long (L1, L2), 7 medium (M3—M9) and 1 short (S10). The size of the acrocentric X chromosome is approximately similar to the M4 pair. The paracentromeric C-blocks occur in all the chromosomes of the complement. The chromosomes of the M4 pair have a minute telomeric C-block. The autosomes of the M6 pair have a thick telomeric C-block and interstitial C- band in heteromorphic state near the telomeric one (Fig. 2). In the prophase of meiosis the long au- tosomes form 2-3 chiasmata, medium-1-2, but the short bivalent only one. The mean frequency of chiasmata on a cell is 12.90 (•}1.00). Parapodisma yamato Tominaga of Storozhenko. 2n d=21. All chromosomes are acrocentric. They may be divided into three size groups: 2 long (L1, L2), 7 medium (M3—M9), and 1 short (S10). The size of the acrocentric X chromosome is approximately similar to that of the M4 pair. The para- centrometric C-blocks occur in all the chromosomes of the complement. The chromosomes of the M5 pair revealed telomeric C-blocks. In the prophase of meiosis the large telomeric C-blocks in the M6 pair of autosomes seem to become double (Fig. 3) similarly to P tenryuensis (see below). In the prophase of meiosis the long autosomes form 2-3 chiasmata, medium-1-2, and short bivalent only one. The mean frequency of chiasmata on a cell is X=13.06 (•} 1.08). Parapodisma tenryuensis Kobayashi. 2n •‰= 21. In 4 males all chromosomes are acrocentric. They amy be divided into 3 size groups: 2 long (L1, L2), 7 medium (M3—M9), and 1 short (S10). The size of the acrocentric X chromosome is approximately similar to that of the M4 pair. The paracen- tromeric C-blocks occur in all the chromosomes of the complement. The L1 pair of chromosomes 2000 C-banded karyotypes of Podisminae grasshoppers 353 Figs. 1-4. I a, b. Podisma sapporensis. Diakinesis. a) M4 with distal C-band (thin arrow) additionally, S9 with interstitial C-band (thick arrow). b) X chromosome with minute intercalar C-band near paracen- tromeric one (thick arrow). 2. Parapodisma subastris. Diakinesis. M4 with minute telomeric C-block (thin arrow), M6 with thick telomeric C-block (thin arrow) and interstitial C-band in heteromorphic state near the telomeric one (thick arrow). 3. Parapodisma yamato. Diakinesis. M5 and M6 with telomeric C- bloks (thin arrows). 4a-d. Parapodisma tentyuenis. a) Diakinesis. L1 with minute telomeric C-block and M6 with thick C-block (arrows). b) Metaphase II. M7 acrocentric with minute interstitial C-band (thick arrow). c) Heteromorphic M7 bivalent (thin arrow). d) Metaphase II with acrocentric (on the right) and metacentric (on the left) M7 bivalent (thin arrows). Bar equals 10 um. 354 A. G. Bugrov et al. Cytologia 65 has a minute telomeric C-block. In the prophase of meiosis the large telomeric C-blocks in the M6 pair of autosomes seem to become double (Fig. 4a). In metaphase II a clearly visible euchromat- ic zone contrasts sharply with the telomeric and near telomeric interstitial C-block in this chro- mosome. The M, pair is acrocentric with a large centromeric C-block and minute interstitial one (Fig. 4b). In the prophase of meiosis the long au- tosomes form 2-3 chiasmata, medium-1-2, and short bivalent only one. The mean frequency of chiasmata on a cell is x=13.78 (•}1.06). One male demonstrated chromosome het- eromorphism in the M7 pair. At prophase I the M7 bivalent consists of one acrocentric homo- logue with the large centromeric C-block and a minute interstitial one. The other homologue in this bivalent is of the same size, metacentric with very small centromeric and telomeric C-blocks in one of the arms. This heteromorphic bivalent forms only one terminal or subterminal chiasma (Fig. 4c). At first anaphase the M7 bivalent un- dergoes divisions as in other autosomes. At sec- ond metaphase the cells with the acrocentric M7 and cells with the metacentric M7 were clearly seen (Fig. 4d). Parapodisma mikado (I. Bolivar). 2n d = 21. The karyological analysis was performed on neuroblast mitosis of embryos. The chromosome complement 2n =21, with all acrocentrics, possi- bly shows the male karyotype (2n d=21, Fig. 5a). They may be divided into 3 size groups: 2 long (L1, L2), 7 medium (M3—M9), and 1 short (S10). The size of the acrocentric X chromosome is approximately similar to the M5 pair. The paracentromeric C-blocks occur in all the chro- mosomes of the complement. The M5 chromo- Figs. 5-6. 5a-c. Parapodisma mikado. a) C-banded karyotype, b) mitotic metaphase. M5 pair with large inter- some pair has a small paracentromeric C-block, stitial C-bands near paracentromeric and telomeric regions a large interstitial one near the telomeric region (thick arrow). c) Thin C-bands between paracentromeric and a telomeric C-block (Fig. 5a, b). In addition, and thick interstitial C-blocks (thick arrows).
Recommended publications
  • Orthoptera: Acrididae) from Five Southeastern States
    6: 115-118 Midsouth Entomologist ISSN: 1936-6019 www.midsouthentomologist.org.msstate.edu Report Noteworthy Collections of Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) From Five Southeastern States. JoVonn G. Hill Mississippi Entomological Museum, Department of Molecular Biology, Entomology, and Plant Pathology Mississippi State University, BOX 9775, Mississippi State, Mississippi [email protected] Abstract: Noteworthy collections for nine grasshopper species from Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, and Mississippi are presented along with a statement of their significance. Key Words: Acrididae, Boopedon, Eotettix, Dendrotettix, Melanoplus, Spharagemon Received: 10-X-2013 Accepted: 16-XII-2013 Introduction In a preliminary list of the grasshoppers of the southeastern United States, Hill and Dakin (2011) reported 160 grasshopper species group names and the states in which they occur in. Since then Otte (2012) and Hill (In press) have described seven and two new species of Melanoplus from the region respectively. As part of an ongoing survey of the grasshopper fauna of the southeastern United States, increasingly refined species distribution information is being compiled. In the process, noteworthy collections have been made representing the first documentation of nine species for the first time from five states. These new state records are reported below. An up to date listing for each southeastern state can be found at the Grasshoppers of the Southeastern U.S.A webpage: http://mississippientomologicalmuseum.org.msstate.edu/Researchtaxapages/Orthoptera/Acrididaepages/ Acridid.intro.htm. Results and Discussion Alabama Melanoplus davisi Hebard: Covington Co., 4 mi NNW Red Level, 31º27'44"N 86º38'52"W, 12 September 2013, J.G. Hill, sandhill, (1♂). Melanoplus pygmaeus Davis: Baldwin Co., Bon Secour National Wildlife Refuge, 29 October 2009, J.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies of North America
    Insects of Western North America 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 2 Insects of Western North America. 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa by Boris C. Kondratieff, Luke Myers, and Whitney S. Cranshaw C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 August 22, 2011 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity. Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 3 Cover Photo Credits: Whitney S. Cranshaw. Females of the blow fly Cochliomyia macellaria (Fab.) laying eggs on an animal carcass on Fort Sill, Oklahoma. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523-1177. Copyrighted 2011 4 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................7 SUMMARY AND MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin's Strategy for Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need
    Prepared by Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources with Assistance from Conservation Partners Natural Resources Board Approved August 2005 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Acceptance September 2005 Wisconsin’s Strategy for Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need Governor Jim Doyle Natural Resources Board Gerald M. O’Brien, Chair Howard D. Poulson, Vice-Chair Jonathan P Ela, Secretary Herbert F. Behnke Christine L. Thomas John W. Welter Stephen D. Willet Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Scott Hassett, Secretary Laurie Osterndorf, Division Administrator, Land Paul DeLong, Division Administrator, Forestry Todd Ambs, Division Administrator, Water Amy Smith, Division Administrator, Enforcement and Science Recommended Citation: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 2005. Wisconsin's Strategy for Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need. Madison, WI. “When one tugs at a single thing in nature, he finds it attached to the rest of the world.” – John Muir The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources provides equal opportunity in its employment, programs, services, and functions under an Affirmative Action Plan. If you have any questions, please write to Equal Opportunity Office, Department of Interior, Washington D.C. 20240. This publication can be made available in alternative formats (large print, Braille, audio-tape, etc.) upon request. Please contact the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Endangered Resources, PO Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707 or call (608) 266-7012 for copies of this report. Pub-ER-641 2005
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated List of the Dermaptera, Dictyoptera, Phasmatoptera, And
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 1 Number 9 -- An Annotated List of the Dermaptera, Dictyoptera, Phasmatoptera, and Orthoptera of Michigan Number 9 -- An Article 1 Annotated List of the Dermaptera, Dictyoptera, Phasmatoptera, and Orthoptera of Michigan December 1968 An Annotated List of the Dermaptera, Dictyoptera, Phasmatoptera, and Orthoptera of Michigan Irving J. Cantrall University of Michigan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Cantrall, Irving J. 1968. "An Annotated List of the Dermaptera, Dictyoptera, Phasmatoptera, and Orthoptera of Michigan," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 1 (9) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol1/iss9/1 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Cantrall: An Annotated List of the Dermaptera, Dictyoptera, Phasmatoptera, 1968 THE MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGIST 299 AN ANNOTATED LIST OF THE DERMAPTERA, DICTYOPTERA, PHASMATOPTERA, AND ORTHOPTERA OF MICHIGAN* Irving J. Cantrall Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 The only publication to date dealing exclusively with the Orthoptera and Dermaptera of Michigan is that of Pettit and McDaniel (1918). In the fifty years since their paper, several factors have combined to increase by nearly one-third the number of orthopterous and dermapterous taxa known for the state. These have been better understanding of the taxonomy of some groups, more extensive collecting, the establishment over the past several years of five advents, and the unquestioned northerly extension during the past two or three decades of the ranges of several species previously known to occur to the south in Ohio and Indiana.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020 Hickory Nut Gorge Green Salamander (Aneides caryaensis) Photo by Austin Patton 2014 Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020 Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate. The list is published periodically, generally every two years.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol 25 No. 1.Indd
    THE NEWSLETTER OF THE ORTHOPTERISTS’ SOCIETY MetalepteaM e t - VOl. 25, NO. 1 March 2005 Documentation of INSIDE THIS ISSUE 06 Infestation by the Grasshop- per Dendrotettix quercus in east Texas 02 Society News Welcome back from the Ninth by Dr. John R. Hilliard International Meeting of the Or- & Dr. John G. Himes thopterists’ Society Address Changes 08 Reports Appreciation for Orthopterology: A New Contributions Survey by N. Grubbs & 03 JOR 13 (1) Mailed M. Niedzlek-Feaver Entomology: press release Membership Orthopterists’ Society 11 04 2003 Financial We welcome these new Report members to the Society. 06 Research 12 Board Members Fashionable Grasshopper Marking by Jean-François Voisin metaleptea 02 WELCOME BACK from the bit)? In truth, the survey took a good part of the summer, Ninth International Meeting of the Orthop- but Nat enjoyed reading some of the papers treating some of the more “untraditional” topics and certainly developed terists’ Society an appreciation for what Orthopteritsts do. Please consider submitting similar material (book review, etc.) I am sure Back from Canmore! I am very envious as I at the last will be of interest to the membership. For example, have minute could not make the trip. Take time to extend the perfect picture of one Orthop feeding on another? It your experience by visiting the meeting website and en- belongs here. I am very sorry I did not have my camera joying the pictures that will be published there. I know the night I watched an Atlanticus testaceus female busily that those of use who could not make the trip will visit munching on the backside of a Neoconocephalus ensiger often.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies of North America
    Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. Part 3 Chapter 1 Survey of Spiders (Arachnida, Araneae) of Fort Sill, Comanche Co., Oklahoma Chapter 2 Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. III. Arachnida: Ixodidae, Scorpiones, Hexapoda: Ephemeroptera, Hemiptera, Homoptera, Coleoptera, Neuroptera, Trichoptera, Lepidoptera, and Diptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University 1 Cover Photo Credits: The Black and Yellow Argiope, Argiope aurantia Lucas, (Photo by P.E. Cushing), a robber fly Efferia texana (Banks) (Photo by C. Riley Nelson). ISBN 1084-8819 Information about the availability of this publication and others in the series may be obtained from Managing Editor, C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Ddiversity, Department of Bbioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1177 2 Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. III Edited by Paul A. Opler Chapter 1 Survey of Spiders (Arachnida, Araneae) of Fort Sill, Comanche Co., Oklahoma by Paula E. Cushing and Maren Francis Department of Zoology, Denver Museum of Nature and Science Denver, Colorado 80205 Chapter 2 Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. III. Arachnida: Ixodidae, Scorpiones, Hexapoda: Ephemeroptera, Hemiptera, Homoptera, Coleoptera, Neuroptera, Trichoptera, Lepidoptera, and Diptera by Boris C. Kondratieff, Jason P. Schmidt, Paul A. Opler, and Matthew C. Garhart C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 January 2005 Contributions of the C.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Population Increases and Related
    Haack and Petrice: Historical Agrilus outbreaks in the Lake States 2019 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 21 Historical Population Increases and Related Inciting Factors of Agrilus anxius, Agrilus bilineatus, and Agrilus granulatus liragus (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in the Lake States (Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin) Robert A. Haack and Toby R. Petrice USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 3101 Technology Blvd., Suite F, Lansing, MI 48910 e-mail: [email protected] (emeritus) and [email protected] Abstract Three native species of tree-infesting Agrilus (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) have regularly reached outbreak levels in the Lake States (Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin), including A. anxius Gory (bronze birch borer), A. bilineatus (Weber) (twolined chestnut borer), and A. granulatus liragus Barter & Brown (bronze poplar borer). The main host trees for these Agrilus are species of Betula for A. anxius, Castanea and Quercus for A. bilineatus, and Populus for A. granulatus liragus. Based on 197 annual forest health reports for Michigan (1950–2017, 66 years), Minnesota (1950–2017, 64 years), and Wisconsin (1951–2017, 67 years), A. bilineatus was the most often reported Agrilus species in all three states (men- tioned in 90 annual reports), with A. anxius second (71 reports) and A. granulatus liragus third (21 reports). Drought was the most commonly reported inciting factor for outbreaks of all three Agrilus species, with defoliation events ranking second. The top two defoliators reported as inciting outbreaks of each species were, in decreasing order, Fenusa pumila Leach (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae; birch leafminer) tied with Malacosoma disstria Hübner (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae; forest tent caterpillar) for A. anxius; M. disstria and Alsophila pometaria (Harris) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae; fall cankerworm) for A.
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta: Orthoptera: Caelifera: Acrididae) I
    Molecular Phylogeny of Melanoplinae (INSECTA: ORTHOPTERA: CAELIFERA: ACRIDIDAE) I. Chintauan-Marquier To cite this version: I. Chintauan-Marquier. Molecular Phylogeny of Melanoplinae (INSECTA: ORTHOPTERA: CAELIF- ERA: ACRIDIDAE). Ecologie, Environnement. Université de Grenoble, 2010. Français. tel- 00580813 HAL Id: tel-00580813 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00580813 Submitted on 29 Mar 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 THÈSE Pour obtenir le grade de DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE GRENOBLE Spécialité Biodiversité – Ėcologie - Environnement Arrêté ministériel : 7 août 2006 Présentée et soutenue publiquement par CHINTAUAN-OANCEA MARQUIER IOANA-CRISTINA le 15 décembre 2010 PHYLOGĖNIE MOLĖCULAIRE DES MELANOPLINAE (INSECTA: ORTHOPTERA: CAELIFERA: ACRIDIDAE) Thèse dirigée par Pompanon François Thèse préparée au sein du Laboratoire d’Ėcologie Alpine UMR UJF-USavoie- CNRS 5553 dans l’Ėcole Doctorale Chimie et Sciences du Vivant JURY Civilité/Nom/Prénom Fonction et lieu de la fonction Rôle Mme. Desutter-Grandcolas Laure Professeur, Musée National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris Rapporteur M. Douzery Emmanuel Professeur, Université de Montpellier 2 Rapporteur M. Nichols A. Richard Professeur, Queen Mary University of London, UK Examinateur M. Pérez Serge Directeur de Recherche CNRS, ESRF Grenoble Examinateur M.
    [Show full text]
  • Mm Arthropod and Nematode Parasites, Parasitoids, And
    ' - mm Arthropod and Nematode Parasites, Parasitoids, and Predators of Acrididae in America North of Mexico Technical Bulletin No. 1460 Agricultural Research Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ryyscji Arthropod and Nematode Parasites, Parasitoids, and Predators of Ácrididae in America North of Mexico >, ai,*' By N. E.|Rp)S^ Technical Bulletin No. 1460 Agricultural Research Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Washington, D.C. Issued March 1973 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington. D.C. 20402 — Price: $2.60 domestic postpaid, or $2.25 GPO Bookstore Stock Number 0100-2624 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I express my sincere thanks to the following indi- viduals: The coleopterists of the Systematic Entomol- ogy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, for checking the nomenclature of the Coleóptera ; George 0. Poinar, Jr., University of California, Berkeley, for his aid with the nematode section ; C. F. W. Muesebeck, U.S. National Museum, Washintgon, D.C., for advice on the Scelio ; A. S. Menke, Systematic Entomology Lab- oratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and R. M. Bohart, Entomology Department, University of Cali- fornia, Davis, for their assistance on the Tachytes; H. W. Prescott, Forest Grove, Oreg., for advice on the Nemestrinidae ; J. E. Henry, Grasshopper Investigation Laboratory, U. S. Department of Agriculture, for life information of Goniopsita oohaga ; W. F. Barr, Depart- ment of Entomology, University of Idaho, and R. L. Lavigne, Department of Entomology, University of Wyoming, for their assistance with the Asilidae. I also give my special appreciation to C. C. Blickenstaff, Grasshopper Investigation Laboratory, U.S. Depart- ment of Agriculture, for his advice and counsel.
    [Show full text]
  • Acridoidea: Acrididae: Melanoplinae)
    THE VALUE OF CYTOLOGY IN TAXONOMY WITH PAltTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE PODISMINI (ACRIDOIDEA: ACRIDIDAE: MELANOPLINAE) V. R. VICKERY Lyman Entomological Museum apd Researcb Laboratory Macdonald College, MCGill University`., St¿. Amne de Bellóvue, Qué. HOA ICO M.].D. White, working in the United States in the 1940's and early 1950's and subsequently in Australia from 1954 to the present, has been thp main driving force in promotio:n. of use of cytology in :;ystematics, particularly of Orthoptera, Use of cytology in systematics of the group is not new; Mcclung (1908, 1914) and others stu_dÉed chromosomes of Orthoptera and Robertson (1916) deve]oped a rather good trea,tise on many species of Orthoptera® More recently, White has carried out a very comprehensive survey ot the Morabine grasshoppers of Australia (Orthoptera: Eumastacidae) which enabled-Key (1976) to complete the work on generic and suprageneric classification of the group. Forty genera are now recognized in the Morabinae (36 of which were new) and 33 new species were described® One of the more interesting aspects of this work is that karyotypic characters were used in a numeT'ical a,nalysis, together with dimensional and meristic characters and those of the phallic complex. White (1970) stated that the Eumastacoidea showed a greater diversity of karyoty- pes than the Acridoidea, each subfarnily of the former usually showing a different typical karyotype. Karyotypes are ueful ri tlHmselves and it is becoming rather common to see ka,ryotypes or even more often the number of male diploid chromosome complement listed in species descriptions. In fact, karyotype can be used in precisely the same way as shape of the genitalia as ¿t `taxonomic character.
    [Show full text]
  • VI.6 Relative Importance of Rangeland Grasshoppers in Western North America: a Numerical Ranking from the Literature
    VI.6 Relative Importance of Rangeland Grasshoppers in Western North America: A Numerical Ranking From the Literature Richard J. Dysart Introduction is important to point out that these estimates represent merely the opinions of those involved, not conclusive There are about 400 species of grasshoppers found in the proof. By including a large number of articles and au- 17 Western States (Pfadt 1988). However, only a small thors that cover most of the literature on the subject, I percentage of these species ever become abundant hope that the resulting compilation will be a consensus enough to cause economic concern. The problem for any from the literature, without introduction of bias on my rangeland entomologist is how to arrange these species part. into meaningful groups for purposes of making manage- ment decisions. The assessment of the economic status This review is restricted to grasshoppers found in 17 of a particular grasshopper species is difficult because of Western United States (Arizona, California, Colorado, variations in food availability and host selectivity. Idaho, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mulkern et al. (1964) reported that the degree of selectiv- Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South ity is inherent in the grasshopper species but the expres- Dakota, Texas, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming) plus sion of selectivity is determined by the habitat. To add to the 4 western provinces of Canada (Alberta, British the complexity, grasshopper preferences may change Columbia, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan). Furthermore, with plant maturity during the growing season (Fielding only grasshoppers belonging to the family Acrididae are and Brusven 1992). Because of their known food habits included here, even though many research papers and capacity for survival, about two dozen grasshopper reviewed mentioned species from other families of species generally are considered as pests, and a few other Orthoptera.
    [Show full text]