Charterville and the Landscape of Social Reform
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ANNMARIE ADAMS CHARTERVII FEAND THE LANDSCAPE OF SOCIAL REFORM oncernabout the desperateliving ership, it also enabled them to vote. The plan was conditions of industrial workers intended to reduce unemployment in the over- in Britain peaked in the 1830s and 1840s with crowded cities and at the same time offer a viable a severe economic depression and unprecedented alternativeto industrialcapitalism. housing shortages.1 Politicians, authors, and archi- Charterville and the other four Chartist estates tects, among others, used legislation, fiction, and were made possible through the establishment of buildings to illustrate viable alternatives to indus- the National Land Company. As described in a trial capitalism. Their method was to compile evi- handbill of 1847 (Fig. 1), the plan was for sub- dence on social evils and then to suggest reform scribers, mostly factory workers from industrial through an often radical reordering of the human centers, to pay weekly dues toward the purchase of and physical landscape. Embedded within this land being obtained by Feargus O'Connor, the Victorian social manifesto were numerous plans charismatic Irish leader of the movement. As the for utopian communities that offered a critique of handbill promised, the benefits, distributed by lot- existing conditions while at the same time pro- tery, included "good land," a "comfortablehouse," posing alternatives in comprehensible terms. The and a sum of money. A pile of manure was also town of Charterville, located in Oxfordshire, En- supplied at the gate to each property; individual gland, was one such community, the product of leases were for life.4 Feargus O'Connor's Chartist Land Plan of 1842. But Chartism entailed much more than the The relict landscape of Chartervilleremains today Land Plan. As historian Dorothy Thompson has as an important reminder of the difficulty of rec- illustrated, it suggested an entire alternative cul- onciling political intentions with the design of the ture. Between 1838 and 1848 working people cultural landscape. from all over Britain joined forces to end the ex- Charterville was established in 1848 as the third ploitation of wage laborers by industrialistsand to of five Chartist settlements.2It consisted of a school extend voting rights to England's nonlandowning and seventy-eight small stone cottages constructed working class. It was one of the largest mass move- on individual lots of four acres or less along a ments in modern history, with more followers than major road from Minster Lovell to Brize Norton.3 many of the groups that overthrew other Euro- The basic objective of the Chartist Land Plan pean governments in 1848.5 The People's Charter was to give working-class people access to land on of 1838, from which the movement drew its name, which they could live and grow their own food. established the official Chartist program. The Because political power was still tied to landown- group sought universal male suffrage, the aboli- 138 BUILDINGS AND REGIONS 139 am ,. _ 4_ r NATIONAL CHARTERVILLE Source Tithe Apportlonment 1851 ORO Ms d d Minster Lovell LAND COMPANY. par PIOVZIIONALLYBZOITBlZD. SHIRES?1. 68. EACH. The objectof tiis Companyis to enableWorking Men, for a triling sum, to obtain posseuiob of Land and Dwelling. upon such terms, that, by honourableand independentlabour, they ma mintain themseleesand familiesin comfortand respectability. BENEFITSASSURED. A - School ad Meetng Room B- Wesleyan Methodist Chapel The followingare the benefit whichthe Companyguarantees to its memben: C-White Hart Inn HOLDER8OFTWO SLE8-A C OIFORTAILE HOUSE,TWO IOCES OFGOOD LAD, A) ?16. HOLDERSOFTHEE 8HAEI-A 81OUE, THLEE ACES, UID ?11.IO HOLD3EROFFOUR 8gIUE8-A HOUSE, FOUR AGCES, iDL e0. LEASESFOREVER WILL BE GRABNTED TOTHE OCCUPAT8. Thiu ensuring to them the vsaue of everyimprovement they may mahe upon their allotments. The Companyaffords great tfciliLieto those memberwho have the meansof purcehing theirallotment. The eant wiJ be moderte, aa it ill be regulatedby a chargeof S per cent uponthe capitalexpended. The Companyhaving been raeledinto existencefor the benefitof the WoUtwG CLAIsst, the Rules renble the pooret to vail themelres of its adventges, u the Sha may be paid by inotalmenteu low TIlt PiClt 1 will.E. TIEULE OrTE COFANT( iOE 4.) b rA I A cuabe obained of Ms WHEELER,the Secaryc, PR v.TTHE OFFICE, 83,DEAI STREET, 80HO, LODOI, ' J hcee membernmay be enrolled,and ev infrmatin obtaied ?.r- o-f k9 feii..,,,.._,, -, i I".m . - - . - ,, __ _ _- __ _ -14 . _ _ __ , , _#-s , 0 5 10 15 20 Fig. 1. Handbillissued by the National LandCompany in chains To Brnze 1847. (CourtesyOxoniensia and KateTiller) Norton Fig. 2. Siteplan of Chartervilleas it existed in 1851. tion of property qualifications for members of Par- (CourtesyOxoniensia and KateTiller) liament, the payment of members, equal electoral districts, and annual parliaments. At the heart of Chartism lay the belief that access to political the inevitable failure of the movement. power provided the only chance to reform indus- O'Connor purchased three hundred acres of trial society. land near Witney in June 1847 at a cost of more Although the political platform of Chartism ap- than ten thousand pounds sterling.6 The choice of pears radical, the architectural manifestations of site was unfortunate; there was no rail connection the Land Plan at Charterville were surprisingly or nearby market, and the soil was poor. In addi- conservative, reflecting an idyllic image of rural tion, the land was on high terrain, making water life and glorifying the individual. Productive labor difficult to obtain. Three wells supplied the entire occupied a central place in the plan of the Chartist estate. As historian Kate Tiller has said, "Just as cottage, but the site planning and exterior design the Chartists believed in access to the land as a of the buildings recalled times when workers en- God-given right, so their water-supply appropri- joyed little power. The architectureof Charterville ately came direct[ly] from heaven."7 reveals conservative aspects of Chartism that illus- The plan of Charterville (Fig. 2) was laid out trate, perhaps more clearly than other documents, by O'Connor and company director Christopher 140 PERSPECTIVES IN VERNACULAR ARCHITECTURE, IV Doyle.8 They located most of the cottages along the main road from Minster Lovell to Brize Nor- ton; similar lots were defined on two minor, per- pendicular streets. The school and eighteen houses were located on Upper Crescent, in the north, while Bushey Ground on the south was a cul-de- sac. Charterville was immediately popular despite the problems of isolation, limited land, and poor farming conditions. Workers inhabited the cot- tages within fourteen months.9 In the design of Charterville, O'Connor postu- lated a return to a completely agrarian society. He intended tenants to raise their own food and pro- vided no facilities for trade or communal labor. O'Connor warned in his book, A Practical Work on the Management of Small Farms, of the "igno- rant landlords . induced by as ignorant writers to adopt the large farm system." He insisted that two hundred acres farmed by one man would nev- er be as productive as fifty men working on plots of four acres each because of the distances involved in carrying manure and drawing produce. 0 There was much debate over whether four acres could support a family, particularly as many of the in- Fig. 3. O'Connor'splan for a cottage, publishedin 1847. LeedsUni- habitants had no previous farming experience. 1 NorthernStar, February 13, (Courtesy versityLibrary) A diagram of a Charterville cottage published by O'Connor in 1847 shows a three-room house with a row of service spaces in the rear (Fig. 3). A courtyard behind the main block of the house was places-"vulnerable, open, and occupied.'13 surrounded by outbuildings for animals and stor- The prominent position of the kitchen in the age. The plan presented clear functional zoning: cottage plan was consistent with the Chartist em- three main living spaces faced the street, less polite phasis on self-sufficient productive labor. In What domestic labor took place behind this zone, and May Be Done with Three Acres of Land, O'Con- the back of the building housed large-scale agri- nor had promised a weekly yield of 14 pounds of cultural labor. In the front, the large, central kitch- bacon, 1.5 stones of flour, 4.5 stones of potatoes, en stepped out from the main block of the house. 20 duck eggs, 2 pounds of honey, and a further The flanking rooms, intended as bedroom and income of 44 pounds sterling "aftera consumption sitting room, were accorded secondary positions and the best of good living."14 He believed that but were equal relative to the kitchen. Paneled this could be achieved with 157 days' labor. The doors separatedthese three interconnected rooms, large Chartist kitchen became the space where ten- each with its own fireplace. Entry to the house was ants processed the fruits of the land and presum- directly into the kitchen without a vestibule space ably realized the joys of family life and labor. or porch.12 Like Henry Glassie's kitchens of Bal- The builder of the Chartist cottage supplied the lymenone, the kitchens of Chartervillewere public kitchen with a store-cupboard, range, and dresser, BUILDINGS AND REGIONS 141 intending the space for more than cooking and designsfor many ruralhouses employing classical eating.15 Larger than the sitting room, the Char- language,but in his housesthe style was used as a tist kitchen probably acted as the primary space way of expressingthe plan on the exterior. As for family interaction and for entertaining visitors. George Hersey has explained, Loudon saw the Access to other parts of the household came only houseas a kind of "informationalappliance," and through the kitchen, and thus the space served as a he matchedspecific meanings to elementsof build- central circulation area mediating between private ings, suggestingthat windows, doors, chimneys, and public spaces, much like the central passage in and porchesacted as "signifiers,"communicating other house forms.