DOCSLIB.ORG

Echo Annual Report 2014 Annex 1 – Geographical Fiches

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Echo Annual Report 2014 Annex 1 – Geographical Fiches ECHO ANNUAL REPORT 2014 ANNEX 1 – GEOGRAPHICAL FICHES 1 Table of Contents Afghanistan .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Algeria .................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Bangladesh .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Cameroon ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 Central African Republic ...................................................................................................................................... 9 Central America ................................................................................................................................................. 10 Central Asia ........................................................................................................................................................ 11 Chad ................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Colombia ............................................................................................................................................................ 14 Djibouti .............................................................................................................................................................. 15 Democratic Republic of Congo and refugees in the Great Lakes Region .......................................................... 16 Disaster Risk Reduction and Resilience in the Caribbean ................................................................................. 18 Emergency Response Toolbox ........................................................................................................................... 19 Ethiopia .............................................................................................................................................................. 21 Gambia .............................................................................................................................................................. 22 Haiti ................................................................................................................................................................... 23 India ................................................................................................................................................................... 24 Iraq ..................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Ivory Coast ......................................................................................................................................................... 27 Kenya ................................................................................................................................................................. 28 Libya ................................................................................................................................................................... 29 Mauritania ......................................................................................................................................................... 31 Myanmar ........................................................................................................................................................... 32 Nepal ................................................................................................................................................................. 33 Niger .................................................................................................................................................................. 34 Pacific ................................................................................................................................................................. 35 2 Pakistan ............................................................................................................................................................. 36 Palestine ............................................................................................................................................................ 37 Philippines ......................................................................................................................................................... 39 Sahel, Mali, Nigeria ............................................................................................................................................ 40 DIPECHO in South East Asia ............................................................................................................................... 41 Senegal .............................................................................................................................................................. 42 Somalia .............................................................................................................................................................. 43 Southern Africa and Indian Ocean .................................................................................................................... 45 South America: Emergency Toolbox, Disaster Risk Reduction .......................................................................... 46 South Sudan ....................................................................................................................................................... 48 Sudan ................................................................................................................................................................. 49 Sri Lanka............................................................................................................................................................. 50 Syria ................................................................................................................................................................... 50 Thailand ............................................................................................................................................................. 52 Uganda............................................................................................................................................................... 53 Ukraine .............................................................................................................................................................. 54 Bosnia i Hercegovina and Serbia ....................................................................................................................... 55 Yemen ................................................................................................................................................................ 56 3 2014 in Afghanistan 1) Total budget allocated in 2014: Humanitarian Aid Other Total EUR 31 500 000 EUR 300 000 EUR 31 800 000* *EUR 31 800 000 is the sum of the initial HIP allocation of EUR 28 500 000 plus a top-up of EUR 3 million following devastating floods in spring 2014 and EUR 300 000 allocated to Afghanistan through "EU Children of Peace". 2) Context and type(s) of crisis: Afghanistan is confronted to a complex protracted crisis: The armed conflict mainly affects rural areas in the south, east and south-east regions. There was a large rise in conflict-related deaths and injuries of Afghan civilians in 2014 with 800 000 people living in displacement. Recurrent natural disasters affect the central, northern and north-eastern regions like the major floods of spring 2014. Military operations in Pakistan in 2014 also forced thousands to seek refuge in neighboring Afghan provinces. 3) Sectors of activity/intervention Support to Emergency Healthcare covering trauma care and emergency health services for victims of conflict and to control epidemic outbreaks and emergency vaccination campaigns (measles and polio) was an important sector of intervention. Funding was provided for protection, non-food items (NFI), emergency shelters, food assistance (both in- kind and cash- based), water and sanitation and livelihood opportunities to displaced people, returning Afghan refugees and people affected by natural disasters. DG ECHO focused on advocacy for the respect of humanitarian principles and launched a communication campaign to increase access for humanitarian organizations. Increasing the preparedness and resilience of Afghan communities to recurrent natural hazards continued to be an important component of DG ECHO's programming in Afghanistan. 4) Key Highlights/major initiatives and operations: Emergency Response Mechanism (ERM): In cooperation with existing coordination mechanisms, support is provided to NGOs to build up capacities for enhanced access, emergency needs assessment and response, in order to ensure that timely assistance can be delivered to disaster-affected people or conflict-affected IDPs. Assistance to refugees and returnees: Increasing numbers of returning
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Positioned to Perform Strongly Established in the South EAST Asian Region, Bukit Darah PLC Is a Broadly Diversified Holding Company
    1 POSITIONED TO PERFORM STRONGLY ESTABLISHED IN THE SOUTH EAST ASIAN REGION, BUKIT DARAH PLC IS A BROADLY DIVERSIFIED HOLDING COMPANY. OUR PORTFOLIO IS DIVERSE, INCLUDING OIL PALM PLANTATIONS, OILS AND FATS, BEVERAGE, PORTFOLIO & ASSET MANAGEMENT, REAL ESTATE AND LEISURE. THIS REPORT DESCRIBES A DIFFICULT YEAR ON ALL FRONTS WHICH THE GROUP ADAPTED TO CONSOLIDATE ITS KEY BUSINESSES. NEW HECTARAGES PLANTED, PLANT CAPACITY INCREASED, BRAND PORTFOLIO ADDED TO, SYSTEMS STREAMLINED AND STAFFING OPTIMISED. WE ARE NOW READY AND WELL POSITIONED TO PERFORM. Carson Cumberbatch PLC is a broadly diversified conglomerate with interests in oil palm plantations, oils and fats, beverages, portfolio & asset management, real estate and leisure sectors. Goodhope Asia Holdings Ltd. is an integrated Oil Palm producer with end to end participation in Palm Oil value chain with presence in Indonesia, Malaysia, India and Singapore. ANNUAL REPORT 2014/15 2 SECTOR OVERVIEW BEVERAGE The beverage sector of the Group has roots going back to over 100 years in the brewing industry of Sri Lanka, where sector holding company, Ceylon Beverage Holdings PLC – formerly known as ‘The Ceylon Brewery’- , was the country’s pioneer brewer. It has nurtured its brand ‘Lion’ through times of traditional brewing in the picturesque and cool climes of Nuwara Eliya, to its modern high tech state-of-the-art plant owned by subsidiary and operating company, Lion Brewery Ceylon PLC in Biyagama. The flagship brand “Lion” is also exported to several countries including USA, Canada, Australia, UK, Japan, and the Maldives where the company is the market leader. In addition to its own brands, Lion Brewery (Ceylon) PLC also produces the internationally renowned global brand “Carlsberg”, under license from Carlsberg International Denmark, since 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Violence Against Children in South Asia © Unicef Rosa 2018
    STRUCTURAL VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN IN SOUTH ASIA © UNICEF ROSA 2018 Cover Photo: Bangladesh, Jamalpur: Children and other community members watching an anti-child marriage drama performed by members of an Adolescent Club. © UNICEF/South Asia 2016/Bronstein The material in this report has been commissioned by the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) regional office in South Asia. UNICEF accepts no responsibility for errors. The designations in this work do not imply an opinion on the legal status of any country or territory, or of its authorities, or the delimitation of frontiers. Permission to copy, disseminate or otherwise use information from this publication is granted so long as appropriate acknowledgement is given. The suggested citation is: United Nations Children’s Fund, Structural Violence against Children in South Asia, UNICEF, Kathmandu, 2018. STRUCTURAL VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN IN SOUTH ASIA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS UNICEF would like to acknowledge Parveen from the University of Sheffield, Drs. Taveeshi Gupta with Fiona Samuels Ramya Subrahmanian of Know Violence in for their work in developing this report. The Childhood, and Enakshi Ganguly Thukral report was prepared under the guidance of of HAQ (Centre for Child Rights India). Kendra Gregson with Sheeba Harma of the From UNICEF, staff members representing United Nations Children's Fund Regional the fields of child protection, gender Office in South Asia. and research, provided important inputs informed by specific South Asia country This report benefited from the contribution contexts, programming and current violence of a distinguished reference group: research. In particular, from UNICEF we Susan Bissell of the Global Partnership would like to thank: Ann Rosemary Arnott, to End Violence against Children, Ingrid Roshni Basu, Ramiz Behbudov, Sarah Fitzgerald of United Nations Population Coleman, Shreyasi Jha, Aniruddha Kulkarni, Fund Asia and the Pacific region, Shireen Mary Catherine Maternowska and Eri Jejeebhoy of the Population Council, Ali Mathers Suzuki.
    [Show full text]
  • The Socioecological Significance of Dispersed Farmland Trees in Northern Ethiopia
    Colby College Digital Commons @ Colby Honors Theses Student Research 2016 Missing the Trees for the Forest: The Socioecological Significance of Dispersed Farmland Trees in Northern Ethiopia Jacob A. Wall Colby College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/honorstheses Part of the Environmental Studies Commons, Geographic Information Sciences Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, Other Environmental Sciences Commons, Remote Sensing Commons, Spatial Science Commons, and the Sustainability Commons Colby College theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed or downloaded from this site for the purposes of research and scholarship. Reproduction or distribution for commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the author. Recommended Citation Wall, Jacob A., "Missing the Trees for the Forest: The Socioecological Significance of Dispersed Farmland Trees in Northern Ethiopia" (2016). Honors Theses. Paper 950. https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/honorstheses/950 This Honors Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at Digital Commons @ Colby. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Colby. Missing the Trees for the Forest: The Socioecological Significance of Dispersed Farmland Trees in Northern Ethiopia Jacob A. Wall Environmental Studies Program Colby College Waterville, Maine May 16, 2016 A thesis submitted to the faculty of the Environmental Studies Program in partial fulfillment of the graduation requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts with honors in Environmental Studies. ________________________ _______________________ ____________________ Travis W. Reynolds, Advisor Manny Gimond, Reader Bruce Rueger, Reader i Copyright © 2016 by the Environmental Studies Program, Colby College.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaddafi Supporters Since 2011
    Country Policy and Information Note Libya: Actual or perceived supporters of former President Gaddafi Version 3.0 April 2019 Preface Purpose This note provides country of origin information (COI) and analysis of COI for use by Home Office decision makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims (as set out in the basis of claim section). It is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of a particular subject or theme. It is split into two main sections: (1) analysis and assessment of COI and other evidence; and (2) COI. These are explained in more detail below. Assessment This section analyses the evidence relevant to this note – i.e. the COI section; refugee/human rights laws and policies; and applicable caselaw – by describing this and its inter-relationships, and provides an assessment on whether, in general: • A person is reasonably likely to face a real risk of persecution or serious harm • A person is able to obtain protection from the state (or quasi state bodies) • A person is reasonably able to relocate within a country or territory • Claims are likely to justify granting asylum, humanitarian protection or other form of leave, and • If a claim is refused, it is likely or unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. Decision makers must, however, still consider all claims on an individual basis, taking into account each case’s specific facts. Country of origin information The country information in this note has been carefully selected in accordance with the general principles of COI research as set out in the Common EU [European Union] Guidelines for Processing Country of Origin Information (COI), dated April 2008, and the Austrian Centre for Country of Origin and Asylum Research and Documentation’s (ACCORD), Researching Country Origin Information – Training Manual, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Journalism Is Not a Crime” Violations of Media Freedom in Ethiopia WATCH
    HUMAN RIGHTS “Journalism Is Not a Crime” Violations of Media Freedom in Ethiopia WATCH “Journalism Is Not a Crime” Violations of Media Freedom in Ethiopia Copyright © 2015 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-32279 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org 2 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | JANUARY 2015 JANUARY 2015 978-1-6231-32279 “Journalism Is Not a Crime” Violations of Media Freedoms in Ethiopia Glossary of Abbreviations ................................................................................................... i Map of Ethiopia .................................................................................................................. ii Summary ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017 5 2017 in Numbers
    ALIMA © Adrienne Surprenant ALIMA © Adrienne THE ALLIANCE FOR INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL ACTION ANNUAL REPORT 2017 SOMMAIRE 2 CONTENT A WORD FROM THE PRESIDENT OF ALIMA5 2017 IN NUMBERS 6 PARTNERSHIP MODEL 7 MALNUTRITION 8 OUTBREAK AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE 10 CAPACITY BUILDING 12 MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 14 PROJECTS BY COUNTRY 15 • BURKINA FASO • CAMEROON • CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC • CHAD • DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO • GUINEA • MALI • NIGER • NIGERIA • SOUTH SUDAN ALIMA’S RESEARCH 36 ALIMA GOVERNANCE 38 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 42 ALIMA © John Wessels ALIMA’s innovative “MUAC for Mothers” program teaches families to screen their children for malnutrition using a simple, tri-colored bracelet. In 2017, ALIMA trained more than 330,000 mothers to recognize signs of malnutrition and this method has been adopted by some local governments and is also now being used by UNICEF in Niger, as well as multiple other NGOs. It is critical to note that ALIMA is comprised of five national organizations that include: Keoogo and SOS Médecins in Burkina ALIMA © Malick Welli ALIMA © Malick Faso; Alerte Santé in Chad; AMCP (Medical Alliance Against Malaria) in Mali; and BEFEN (Well-being of Women and Children in Niger). ALIMA’s partnership model allows us to tap into local A WORD FROM THE knowledge and share that expertise across our programs, while PRESIDENT building local capacity. Elsewhere, we put the finishing touches on our newest innovation, the CUBE - a biosecure emergency care unit for outbreaks. The CUBE is a self-contained and easily transportable treatment DEAR FRIENDS, unit for outbreaks of highly-infectious diseases, which reduces the need for cumbersome protective gear in hot and humid We are pleased to share with you ALIMA’s 2017 Annual Report environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia COI Compilation
    BEREICH | EVENTL. ABTEILUNG | WWW.ROTESKREUZ.AT ACCORD - Austrian Centre for Country of Origin & Asylum Research and Documentation Ethiopia: COI Compilation November 2019 This report serves the specific purpose of collating legally relevant information on conditions in countries of origin pertinent to the assessment of claims for asylum. It is not intended to be a general report on human rights conditions. The report is prepared within a specified time frame on the basis of publicly available documents as well as information provided by experts. All sources are cited and fully referenced. This report is not, and does not purport to be, either exhaustive with regard to conditions in the country surveyed, or conclusive as to the merits of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Every effort has been made to compile information from reliable sources; users should refer to the full text of documents cited and assess the credibility, relevance and timeliness of source material with reference to the specific research concerns arising from individual applications. © Austrian Red Cross/ACCORD An electronic version of this report is available on www.ecoi.net. Austrian Red Cross/ACCORD Wiedner Hauptstraße 32 A- 1040 Vienna, Austria Phone: +43 1 58 900 – 582 E-Mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.redcross.at/accord This report was commissioned by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Division of International Protection. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it endorse, its content. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of abbreviations ........................................................................................................................ 4 1 Background information ......................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Geographical information .................................................................................................... 6 1.1.1 Map of Ethiopia ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Privatization in Developing Countries: What Are the Lessons of Recent Experience?
    Saul Estrin and Adeline Pelletier Privatization in developing countries: what are the lessons of recent experience? Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Estrin, Saul and Pelletier, Adeline (2018) Privatization in developing countries: what are the lessons of recent experience? World Bank Research Observer, 33 (1). pp. 65-102. ISSN 0257-3032 DOI: 10.1093/wbro/lkx007 © 2018 The Authors This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/87348/ Available in LSE Research Online: March 2018 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Privatisation in developing countries: What are the lessons of recent experience? Saul Estrin ● Adeline Pelletier This paper reviews the recent empirical evidence on privatisation in developing countries, with particular emphasis on new areas of research such as the distributional impacts of privatisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis of Key Findings from Inter-Agency Humanitarian Evaluations
    Synthesis of key findings from Inter-Agency Humanitarian Evaluations (IAHEs) of the international responses to crises in the Philippines (Typhoon Haiyan), South Sudan and the Central African Republic July 2016 Synthesis Report Cover Photo: Damage behind Eastern Visayas Hospital. Tacloban, Philippines. 11/20/13 Cover Photo Credit: Francisco Guerrero The Synthesis of key findings from Inter-Agency Humanitarian Evaluations (IAHEs) was prepared by James Darcy. This study was commissioned by the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) on behalf of the Inter-Agency Humanitarian Evaluations Steering Group. Members of the Steering Group are ALNAP, FAO, IFRC, OCHA, UNHCR, UNICEF, WFP, WHO. The project was managed by Victoria Saiz-Omenaca, Chief a.i. Evaluation and Oversight Unit, OCHA, and Chair of the Management Group. Management Group members included: Marta Bruno (FAO), Hicham Daoudi (UNFPA), Machiel Salomons (UNHCR), Koorosh Raffi (UNICEF),and Elise Benoit (WFP). Disclaimer The contents and conclusions expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the IAHE Steering Group for Inter-Agency Humanitarian Evaluations, the Management Group, or the United Nations. Responsibility for the opinions expressed in this report rests solely with the author. The designations in this publication do not imply any opinion on the legal status of any country or territory, or of it authorities, or the delimitation of frontiers. About the author James Darcy has more than 20 years of experience of working in the humanitarian sector. As Humanitarian Coordinator at Oxfam GB in the 1990s, he oversaw programmes in East and Central Africa, the Balkans, the Middle East, and South and East Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Use of Targeted Sanctions Can Undermine Peace in South Sudan
    HOW THE USE OF TARGETED SANCTIONS CAN UNDERMINE PEACE IN SOUTH SUDAN BY MATTHEW LERICHE UN PHOTO/LOEY FELIPE The misguided application of targeted sanctions in South the choice to propose further sanctions – only weeks after a Sudan will not support peace; rather, they have the potential peace agreement between the warring parties was resolved – to foster conflict.1 Nor are targeted sanctions the appropriate raises questions regarding these sanctions specifically, and forum to further justice. The following consideration of the the usefulness of targeted sanctions in supporting peace, use of targeted sanctions in the case of South Sudan’s current more generally. internal conflict (2013–2015) and peace process concludes that South Sudan’s President Salva Kiir Mayardit and rather than support peace, as the sanctions presented by the opposition leader Riek Machar (formerly vice president, United States (US), European Union (EU), Canada and, most recently, the United Nations (UN) Security Council purport, they are at best benign, and at worst, present a threat to Above: The United Nations Security Council unanimously sustainable peace. adopts Resolution 2206, imposing sanctions on On 8 September 2015, US, British and French individuals and entities deemed responsible for, or representatives at the UN Security Council circulated a complicit in, actions or policies that threaten the peace, security or stability of South Sudan. The Resolution also proposal, under Resolution 2206, to add targeted sanctions on establishes a Sanctions Committee of the Council to a further two South Sudanese leaders they claim are obstacles monitor compliance, and requests the Secretary-General to peace. Even though Russian and Angolan representatives to create a Panel of Experts to assist the Committee voiced objection, forcing the deferral of the proposal,2 (3 March 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Financial Inclusion in Africa
    WOMEN’S FINANCIAL INCLUSION IN AFRICA Women’s Financial Inclusion in Africa Barriers, Costs and Opportunities By Nomsa Daniels The financial exclusion of women is a global problem with ‘more than 1.3 billion women in the world here is plenty of compelling evidence operating outside the formal financial system’ (Demirguc-Kunt, Klapper & Singer, 2013: 2). This that women are a powerful driver of situation is mirrored in Africa where more than 70 percent of women are financially excluded and Teconomic growth. We know that women where women’s access to finance and financial services is consistently behind that of their male make a significant economic contribution to counterparts (MFW4A, GIZ & New Faces New Voices, 2012). Accelerating women’s financial African economies through their entrepre- inclusion thus requires bold and sustained action to advance women’s economic opportunities neurial activities and involvement in the labour and rights and to ensure that they can meaningfully participate in the economy without undue market. We also know that women are good constraints and barriers that limit their progress. savers and that they plough back most of their income into improving the well-being of their families. To increase their economic opportu- nities, women need a level playing field with a sound educational foundation, more and better jobs, a business and legal climate that supports their economic pursuits, a financial sector that gives them access to affordable financial services tailored to their needs as well as and the recognition of their importance as a market segment which should be cultivated because it makes good business sense.
    [Show full text]
  • Background the Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator (ERC) Manages CERF on Behalf of the UN Secretary-General
    Strategic use of CERF Information Paper Background The Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator (ERC) manages CERF on behalf of the UN Secretary-General. The ERC allocates CERF funds to humanitarian crises based on needs assessments in the field and in order to “promote early action and response to reduce loss of life, enhance response to time- critical requirements and strengthen core elements of humanitarian response in underfunded crises”.1 In the last few years, the ‘strategic use of CERF’ has been pursued so as to maximize the impact of a limited CERF funding in meeting the immediate life-saving needs of affected people, in an increasingly complex operational environment. In each country that applies for a CERF allocation, the Resident Coordinator and Humanitarian Coordinator (RC/HC) leads a process by the (humanitarian) country team to develop submissions that prioritizes essential life-saving activities in a strategic, focused and coherent manner, aiming to achieve specific common objectives – be they in terms of advocacy, creating an enabling environment for humanitarian response, or mobilising resources. The ERC has taken the opportunity of a CERF allocation to highlight a new or emerging crisis, or draw attention to regional implications of a crisis or an underfunded situation. In this sense, CERF funds can act as a catalyst for global advocacy. Below, some examples of strategic use of CERF funds are highlighted. CERF funding in the IASC designated Level 3 emergencies When the Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) declares a Level 3 (L3) emergency for a major crisis requiring system wide response, the CERF plays a key enabling function in terms of funding and advocacy.
    [Show full text]