DOCSLIB.ORG

Twenty-Five Years After Chornobyl Accident: Safety for the Future»

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Twenty-Five Years After Chornobyl Accident: Safety for the Future» Ministry of Ukraine of Emergencies All-Ukrainian Scientific Research Institute for Civil Defense of population and territories from technogenic and natural emergences. «Twenty-five Years after Chornobyl Accident: Safety for the Future» National Report of Ukraine Кyiv 2011 УДК 621.311.25:621.039.586](477.41-21) ББК 31.47(4Укр-4Киї)-08 Д22 To compile the National Report materials of the following organizations were used: Ministry of Ukraine of Emergencies, Ministry of Energy and coal-mining industry of Ukraine, Ministry of Public health of Ukraine, State Nuclear regulatory inspection of Ukraine, Committee on Environmental Policy, Use of Natural Resources and Elimination of Consequences of Chornobyl Disaster at Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, National Academy of medical sciences of Ukraine, National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, National Commission on Radiological Protection of Ukraine. The materials included in the report were compiled by: Abramenko I.V. (3.3.3); Bazyka D.A. (3.3; 7.5.1); Baklan V.A. (8.2); Balashov L.S. (2.1.3); Bakhanova Ye.V. (3.1.1); Bebeshko V.G. (3); Belousova L.P. (7.3.2); Bilyj Д.O. (3.3.1); Bogdanova T.I. (3.2.4); Bondarenko G.M. (2.1.3); Borysyuk M.M. (7; 8); Boyuk L.T. (7.2.4); Buzunov V.O. (3.2); Vasylenko V.V. (3.1.3); Vdovenko V.Yu. (3.2.3); Vynograds’ka V.D. (2.2.3); Voznyuk V.M. (7.2.1.); Voytsekhovytch О.V. (2.1.1; 2.2.2); Voytchulene Yu.S. (3.2.1); Galkina S.G.Г. (3.3.1); Garger E.K. (2.1.1); Giryj V.A. (2.1.1); Glygalo V.M. (7.4); Gramotkin I.I. (5); Grygorash О.V. (7.3.4); Grodzinsky D.M. (2.2.1); Gudzenko N.A. (3.2.1); Gudkov I. M. (7.2.4); Davydov M.M. (2.2.4); Davydchyuk S.V. (2.1.1); Dolin V.V. (2.1.3, 2.2.1); Dutov O.I. (2.1.2; 7.2.1); Dyagil I.S. (3.3.1); Evdin O.M. (8.3); Zhdanova N.M. (2.1.3); Zajvenko V.V. (7.2.5); Ivanova V.E. (8.2; 8.3); Ivanov Yu.O. (2.1.3); Ilyk A.A. (5); Ishchenko A.V. (4.2; 7.2.2; 7.5.1); Yoshchenko V.I. (2.2.1); Kalynenko L.V. (7.2.3); Kanivets V.V. (2.1.1); Kashparov V.O. (2.1.3; 2.2; 2.3); Kilotchits’ka T.P. (7.3.4); Kireev S.I. (2.1.1; 2.1.2); Kymakovs’ka N.O. (2.2.1); Klyuchnikov O.O. (1; 5; 5.1); Kovalenko O.M. (3.2.4; 3.3.1); Kovalyukh M.M. (2.1.3); Kovgan L.M. (3.1.3); Kolimasov I. M. (2.1.1); Koltunov B.G. (6.1); Kondratyuk S.Ya. (2.1.3); Konoplyts’ka Т.О. (4.4.1); Korhagin P.O. (6); Kosovets O.O. (2.1.1); Kochkin K.A. (7.3.1); Kravets V.A. (7.3.2); Kravchenko O.S. (4.3); Krasnikova L.I. (3.2.1); Krasnov V.O. (1; 5.1); Krasnov V.P.. (2.2.4); Kutlakhmedov Yu.O. (2.1.4); Kuchma M.D. (7.2.1); Kushka V.M. (7.3.3); Lazarev M.M. (2.2.3); Landin V.P. (2.1.2; 2.2.4; 7.2.1); Laptev G.V. (2.1.1); Likhtaryov I.A. (3.1); Loganovsky K.M. (3.4.1); Los’ I.P. (6.2); Masyuk S.V. (3.1.3); Matvienko A.P. (4.2); Medun V.D. (7.3.2); Myshkovs’ka A.A. (7.2.2); Mozhar A.O. (7.2.1); Molchanov M.V. (8.3.3); Nasvit O,I, (7.1); Nechaev S.Yu. (5.1.5); Nikolaeva G.M. (6.2); Ol’khovik Yu.A. (7.3.2); Omeliyanets M.I. (4.4); Omeliyanets S.M. (1.4; 4.4; 7); Omelyashko R.A. (7.5.3.); Orlov O.O. (2.2.4); Perepelyatnikov G.P. (2.2.3; 2.3; 8.3); Perepelyatnikova L.V. (7.5); Polyakova I.O. (6.3); Popova E.I. (7.3.1); Poyarkov V.O. (8; 8.1); Prister B.S. (2); Prykashchikova K.E. (3.2.2); Prysyazhnyuk A.E. (3.2.5); Pushkaryov O.V. (2.1.3); Rybakova E.O. (7.5); Rybchyuk A.N. (7.3.2); Romanenko A.Yu. (3.2.5); Rud’ko V.M. (1; 5.1); Savushchik M.P. (2.2.4); Sayenko Yu.I. (4); Sarkisova E.O. (3.4.4); Seida V.O. (1; 5.2); Skakun V.O. (7.5); Skvortsov V.V. (6.1); Skripkin V.V. (2.1.3); Sobotovytch E.V. (2.1.3; 6); Sova S.I. (7.2.3); Stepanova E.I. (3.2.3); Sushko V.O. (3.4.3; 5.1.5); Sushko T.V. (7.3.4); Tal’ko V.V. (3.3.3); Tabachny L.Ya. (2.1; 7.2.1); Tkachenko N.V. (7.2.1); Tokarevsky V.V. (6.2; 6.3); Tron’ko M.D. (3.2.4); Uyazdovs’ka O.V. (7.2.5); Fedirko P.A. (3.3.2); Khodorivs’ka N.V. (4.2; 4.3.1); Kholosha V.I. (1; 4.1; 5; 7); Tsuprikov V.A. (3.2.1); Chabanyuk V.S. (2.1.1); Chepurny M.I. (3.1.3); Chumak A.A. (3; 7.5.1); Chumak V.V. (3.1.1, 3.1.2); Chupryna S.V. (8.3.2); Shvaiko L.I.(3.4.3); Shvalya S.M. (3; 7.2.2); Shevchenko O.L. (2.1.3); Shestopalov V.M. (2.1.1; 2.1.3; 2.2.2; 6); Shybetsky Yu.O. (6.2); Shmidt L.B. (7.3.1; 7.3.3); Shteynberg M.O. (1.1); Shcherbin V.M. (1; 5; 5.1); Yanovych L.A. (3.4.1). Final version was made by the editorial board: Baloga V.I. (Editor-in-chief), Kholosha V.I. (assistant editor-in chief), Evdin O.M. ((assistant editor-in chief), Perepelyatnikov G.P. (executive secretary), Borysyuk M.M., Ishchenko A.V., Makarovs’ka O.A., Omeliyanets S.M., Serdyuk A.M., Sova S.I., Tabachny L.Ya., Tokarevsky V.V., Khalimon G.V., Shestopalov V.M. Editorial-technical group: Perepelyatnykova L.V., Blazhchuk K.V., Bukovs’ka V.S., Ivanova T.M., Il’ina N.E, Kalynenko L.V., Kashtan G.M., Kymakovs’ka N.O., Rudens’ka G.A.. Co-ordinating organisation: All-Ukrainian Scientific Research Institute for Civil Defense of population and territories from technogenic and natural emergencies (ME of Ukraine). Twenty-five Years after Chornobyl Accident: Safety for the Д22 Future. – K.: KIM. – 328 p. ISBN 978-966-1547-64-2 Scientific report sums up the work on overcoming the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster during 25 years and contains recommendations and conclusions regarding the safety of nuclear power engineering for the future. The authors of chapters are responsible for presentation and reliability of materials УДК 621.311.25:621.039.586](477.41-21) ББК 31.47(4Укр-4Киї)-08 ISBN 978-966-1547-64-2 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. CHERNOBYL CATASTROPHE. IMPLEMENTATION OF FIRST-PRIORITY MEASURES ON MITIGATING ITS CONSEQUENCES .............. 12 1.1. Reasons and scale of the accident at ChNPP ........................................................................... 12 1.2. Measures on limiting radioactive substance releases into the environment............................. 19 1.3. Activities on population protection.......................................................................................... 21 1.4. Establishment of state management system on overcoming the consequences of the Chernobyl catastrophe.................................................................................................... 25 1.5. Shelter Object construction...................................................................................................... 32 2. RADIOECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES. RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINATION DYNAMICS OF TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS AND PROTECTIVE MEASURES EFFICIENCY ............................................................................................................................... 36 2.1. General characteristics of radioactive contamination in atmosphere, soil, surface water and groundwater ................................................................................................ 36 2.1.1. Scales and characteristics of the area contamination by Chernobyl fallout radionuclides................................................................................ 36 2.1.2. Radiation monitoring system for the environment......................................................... 50 2.1.3. Recovery of ecosystems affected by radioactive contamination.................................... 52 2.1.4. Environmental regulation issue ..................................................................................... 56 2.2. Formation of radiation conditions and economic activities in the areas contaminated as a result of the СhNPP accident .................................................. 59 2.2.1. Radiobiological effects of ionizing radiation impact on biota....................................... 59 2.2.2. Addressing water supply problems in population centres.............................................. 63 2.2.3. Farming in radioactively contaminated areas ................................................................ 64 2.2.4. Solving of radioecological problems of forestry............................................................ 78 2.3. Main tasks and expected future development of agriculture on radioactively contaminated territories ................................................................................ 83 3. RADIOLOGICAL AND HEALTH CONSEQUENCES OF CHERNOBYL DISASTER .................................................................................................. 85 3.1. Irradiation doses....................................................................................................................... 85 3.1.1. Radiation doses of clean-up workers of the accident. Retrospective dose reconstruction of clean-up workers of the accident......................... 85 3.1.2. Dosimetry of evacuees ................................................................................................... 94 3.1.3. Population irradiation doses ........................................................................................ 102 3.2. The population health and strategy for its conservation in remote post-accident period ............................................................................................... 110 3.2.1. The health state of the Chernobyl NPP accident clean-up workers.............................. 111 3.2.2. Health state of evacuated in infancy at the time of the accident .................................. 120 3.2.3. Health Effects of the Chernobyl disaster in various contingents of the affected child population.................................................................................... 121 3.2.4. Diseases of thyroid gland ............................................................................................. 130 3 3.2.5. Epidemiological studies of health of the population living in contaminated territories............................................................................................ 136 3.3. Early and long-term effects associated with irradiation ........................................................ 149 3.3.1. Acute radiation syndrome............................................................................................. 149 3.3.2. Radiation cataracts and other eye pathology ...............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anthropogenic Transformation of Hydrological Regime of the Dnieper River
    Manuscript Number: 2701 Indian Journal of Ecology (2018) 45(3): 445-453 NAAS Rating: 4.96 Anthropogenic Transformation of Hydrological Regime of The Dnieper River Vitalii Ivanovich Pichura, Daria Sergeevna Malchykova1, Pavel Aleksandrovich Ukrainskij2, Iryna Aleksandrovna Shakhman and Anastasiia Nikolaevna Bystriantseva1 Kherson State Agricultural University, Ukraine, 73006, Kherson, Stritens'ka str. 23, 1Kherson State University, Ukraine, 7300 0, Kherson, Universitets'ka str. 27, 2Belgorod State National Research University, Russian Federation, 308015, Belgorod, 85 Pobedy Str. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Problems of rational water use and water quality assessment are the priorities of many states, especially in the basins of transboundary rivers. Creation and functioning of the cascade of Dnieper reservoirs led to a radical transformation of the hydrological regime of the Dnieper River. As a result, there occurred a significant deterioration of the physical, chemical and biological characteristics of surface water quality, increase of its trophic state, reduction of the efficiency and stability of the aquatic ecosystem of the Dnieper basin, which is largely determined by anthropogenic factors. As a result of interpretation the series of space images (August, 1986-2016) of the satellites Landsat- 5, Landsat- 7 and Landsat-8 with a spatial resolution of 30 meters, the spatio-temporal trend of changes in physical (water transparency), hydrochemical (general phosphorus concentration in water), biological (chlorophyll-a) properties of water areas of reservoirs was determined. In studies trophic state index developed by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection was used to classify all types of water surface, including rivers. It is established that the value of trophic state index in reservoirs is distributed unevenly from 26.5 to 56.5.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 27 September 2019
    United Nations A/74/461 General Assembly Distr.: General 27 September 2019 Original: English . Seventy-fourth session Agenda item 71 (d) Strengthening of the coordination of humanitarian and disaster relief assistance of the United Nations, including special economic assistance: strengthening of international cooperation and coordination of efforts to study, mitigate and minimize the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster Persistent legacy of the Chernobyl disaster Report of the Secretary-General Summary The present report is submitted in accordance with General Assembly resolution 71/125 on the persistent legacy of the Chernobyl disaster and provides an update on the progress made in the implementation of all aspects of the resolution. The report provides an overview of the recovery and development activities undertaken by the agencies, funds and programmes of the United Nations system and other international actors to address the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster. The United Nations system remains committed to promoting the principle of leaving no one behind and ensuring that the governmental efforts to support the affected regions are aimed at achieving the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals. 19-16688 (E) 041019 151019 *1916688* A/74/461 I. General situation 1. Since the Chernobyl nuclear plant accident on 26 April 1986, the United Nations, along with the Governments of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine, has been leading the recovery and development efforts to support the affected regions. While extensive humanitarian work was conducted immediately after the accident, additional recovery and rehabilitation activities were conducted in the following years to secure the area, limit the exposure of the population, provide medical follow-up to those affected and study the health consequences of the incident.
    [Show full text]
  • Present and Future Environmental Impact of the Chernobyl Accident
    IAEA-TECDOC-1240 Present and future environmental impact of the Chernobyl accident Study monitored by an International Advisory Committee under the project management of the Institut de protection et de sûreté nucléaire (IPSN), France August 2001 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Waste Safety Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria PRESENT AND FUTURE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THE CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT IAEA, VIENNA, 2001 IAEA-TECDOC-1240 ISSN 1011–4289 © IAEA, 2001 Printed by the IAEA in Austria August 2001 FOREWORD The environmental impact of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident has been extensively investigated by scientists in the countries affected and by international organizations. Assessment of the environmental contamination and the resulting radiation exposure of the population was an important part of the International Chernobyl Project in 1990–1991. This project was designed to assess the measures that the then USSR Government had taken to enable people to live safely in contaminated areas, and to evaluate the measures taken to safeguard human health there. It was organized by the IAEA under the auspices of an International Advisory Committee with the participation of the Commission of the European Communities (CEC), the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the International Labour Organisation (ILO), the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). The IAEA has also been engaged in further studies in this area through projects such as the one on validation of environmental model predictions (VAMP) and through its technical co-operation programme.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chernobyl Liquidator Medal—An Educational Essay
    Article Chernobyl’s Lesser Known Design Flaw: The Chernobyl Liquidator Medal—An Educational Essay Michael McIntire * and John Luczaj Department of Natural & Applied Sciences, University of Wisconsin–Green Bay, Green Bay, WI 54311, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-920-465-5131 Received: 26 June 2019; Accepted: 7 August 2019; Published: 9 August 2019 Abstract: The honorary Chernobyl Liquidator Medal depicts pathways of alpha, gamma, and beta rays over a drop of blood, signifying the human health impacts of the Chernobyl accident. A relativistic analysis of the trajectories depicted on the Chernobyl Liquidator Medal is conducted assuming static uniform magnetic and electric fields. The parametric trajectories are determined using the energies of alpha (α) and beta (β) particles relevant to the Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident and compared with the trajectories depicted on the liquidator medal. For minimum alpha particle velocity of 0.0512c, the beta particle trajectory depicted on the medal is highly unlikely to have come from a naturally occurring nuclear decay process. The parametric equations are used to determine the necessary beta energies to reproduce the depicted trajectories. This article documents the unfortunate misrepresentation of a famous scientific experiment on an honorary medal and illustrates the importance of better communication between artists and scientists. Keywords: Chernobyl; liquidator; medal; radiation; trajectories; physics; design 1. Introduction 1.1. The Chernobyl Power Station Accident and the Liquidators With near universal acceptance of global climate change by today’s scientific community, coupled with a looming energy shortage as carbon-based fuels become increasingly limited, there has been a revitalization of nuclear energy throughout much of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment International 146 (2021) 106282
    Environment International 146 (2021) 106282 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Environment International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/envint Current radiological situation in areas of Ukraine contaminated by the Chornobyl accident: Part 2. Strontium-90 transfer to culinary grains and forest woods from soils of Ivankiv district I. Labunskaa’*, S. Levchukb, V. Kashparov b,c, D. Holiakab, L. Yoschenkob, D. Santilloa, P. Johnston a a Greenpeace Research Laboratories, Innovation Centre Phase 2, Rennes Drive, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK b Ukrainian Institute of Agricultural Radiology (UIAR) of National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Mashinobudivnykiv str.7, Chabany, Kyiv Region 08162, Ukraine c CERAD CoE Environmental Radioactivity/Department of Environmental Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1432 Aas, Norway ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Handling Editor: Olga Kalantzi Some of the highest 90Sr activity concentrations recorded beyond the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone occur in the Ivankiv district of Ukraine, located approximately 50 km south of the power plant, an area which nonetheless Keywords: remains important for agricultural production. Although characterized by soils with low exchangeable calcium 90Sr values, which can enhance the bioavailability of certain radionuclides, information on the transfer of 90Sr to food Grain contamination crops and trees in the region has remained limited to date. Analysis of 116 grain samples (wheat, rye, oat, barley Wood contamination or Triticale) collected from fields in 13 settlements in the region between 2011 and 2019 revealed 90Sr and 137Cs The Chernobyl accident Effective dose activity concentrations above Ukrainian limits in almost half of those samples, with annual averages exceeding Transfer factor this limit in four of those nine years (most recently in 2018) and with no clear evidence for a declining trend over time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 1992, No.26
    www.ukrweekly.com Published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc.ic, a, fraternal non-profit association! ramian V Vol. LX No. 26 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY0, JUNE 28, 1992 50 cents Orthodox Churches Kravchuk, Yeltsin conclude accord at Dagomys summit by Marta Kolomayets Underscoring their commitment to signed by the two presidents, as well as Kiev Press Bureau the development of the democratic their Supreme Council chairmen, Ivan announce union process, the two sides agreed they will Pliushch of Ukraine and Ruslan Khas- by Marta Kolomayets DAGOMYS, Russia - "The agree­ "build their relations as friendly states bulatov of Russia, and Ukrainian Prime Kiev Press Bureau ment in Dagomys marks a radical turn and will immediately start working out Minister Vitold Fokin and acting Rus­ KIEV — As The Weekly was going to in relations between two great states, a large-scale political agreements which sian Prime Minister Yegor Gaidar. press, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church change which must lead our relations to would reflect the new qualities of rela­ The Crimea, another difficult issue in faction led by Metropolitan Filaret and a full-fledged and equal inter-state tions between them." Ukrainian-Russian relations was offi­ the Ukrainian Autocephalous Ortho­ level," Ukrainian President Leonid But several political breakthroughs cially not on the agenda of the one-day dox Church, which is headed by Metro­ Kravchuk told a press conference after came at the one-day meeting held at this summit, but according to Mr. Khasbu- politan Antoniy of Sicheslav and the conclusion of the first Ukrainian- beach resort, where the Black Sea is an latov, the topic was discussed in various Pereyaslav in the absence of Mstyslav I, Russian summit in Dagomys, a resort inviting front yard and the Caucasus circles.
    [Show full text]
  • Chornobyl Center for Nuclear Safety, Radioactive Waste and Radioecology the Report Prepared in a Framework of GEF UNEP Project &
    Chornobyl Center for Nuclear Safety, Radioactive Waste and Radioecology The report prepared in a framework of GEF UNEP Project "Project entitled "Conserving, Enhancing and Managing Carbon Stocks and Biodiversity in the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone" (Project ID: 4634; IMIS: GFL/5060-2711-4C40) Revision and optimization of the systems of routine and scientific radiological monitoring of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems in the ChEZ Slavutich - 2016 1 Analysis by Prof. V. Kashparov Director of UIAR of NUBiP of Ukraine Dr S. Levchuk Head of the Laboratory of UIAR of NUBiP of Ukraine Dr. V. Protsak Senior Researcher of UIAR of NUBiP of Ukraine Dr D. Golyaka Researcher of UIAR of NUBiP of Ukraine Dr V. Morozova Researcher of UIAR of NUBiP of Ukraine M. Zhurba Researcher of UIAR of NUBiP of Ukraine This report, publications discussed, and conclusions made are solely the responsibility of the au- thors 2 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 System of the radioecological monitoring in the territory of Ukraine alienated after the Chernobyl accident 8 2. Exclusion Zone....................................................................................................................................... 11 2.1 Natural facilities11 2.2 Industrial (technical) facilities 12 2.2.1 Facilities at the ChNPP industrial site.....................................................................................12 2.2.2 Facilities
    [Show full text]
  • Egzemplarz Bezpłatny (PDF)
    Turystyka historyczna Tom 2 Turystyka historyczna Tom 2 pod redakcją Zbigniewa Hojki i Krzysztofa Nowaka Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego • Katowice 2020 Recenzenci Tomasz Przerwa Tadeusz Siwek Rada Naukowa Andriej Kharuk (Lviv), Eugeniusz Kłosek (Wrocław), Rastislav Kožiak (Banská Bystrica), Magdalena Nowak (Gdańsk), Dariusz Rolnik (Katowice), Jan Rychlík (Praha), Henryk Walczak (Szczecin), Aleš Zářický (Ostrava) Rada Redakcyjna Piotr Boroń, Maciej Fic, Wacław Gojniczek, Zbigniew Hojka, Joanna Januszewska‑Jurkiewicz, Lech Krzyżanowski, Dorota Malczewska‑Pawelec, Krzysztof Nowak, Aleksandra Skrzypietz Spis treści Wprowadzenie (Zbigniew Hojka, Krzysztof Nowak) 7 I. Z dziejów podróżowania i turystyki Ewa Wala Rozwój turystyki w Karpatach Wschodnich do 1914 roku (w świetle przewodników i „Pamiętników Towarzystwa Tatrzańskiego”) 11 II. Z dziejów ruchu pątniczego Vladyslav Rozhkov Cudami słynąca Matka Boża Latyczowska – Pani Podola, Wołynia i Lublina 49 III. Na współczesnych szlakach historii Wiesław Kaczanowicz Vindolanda – z badań nad historią rzymskiej Brytanii 63 Zbigniew Bereszyński Turystyczne walory zabytków budownictwa obronnego na Górnym Śląsku 82 Ariel Ciechański, Judyta Kurowska‑Ciechańska Parowozownia Skierniewice jako element inspiracji turystów historią kolei 106 Krzysztof Nowak Turystyka historyczna na pograniczach – pozytywna energia Czerniowiec 118 6 Spis treści Iwona Fischer Szlakiem postaci historycznej – alternatywna trasa turystyczna w mieście z nad- miarem zabytków (na przykładzie Krakowa, licznych w tym mieście szlaków znanych osób, a w szczególności szlaku śladami Ignacego Jana Paderew- skiego) 135 Maciej Miezian Nowa Huta – fragment Górnego Śląska na terenie Małopolski 149 Maja Murawska Cmentarz jako produkt turystyczny na przykładzie cmentarzy mennonickich na Żuławach 162 Mariusz Solarz Fort Skotniki na szlaku Twierdzy Kraków. Działalność Centrum Dokumentacji Zsyłek, Wypędzeń i Przesiedleń 172 Adrian Rams Obóz dwóch totalitaryzmów. Jaworzno 1943–1956 jako miejsce pamięci.
    [Show full text]
  • Science C Author(S) 2020
    Discussions https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2019-174 Earth System Preprint. Discussion started: 23 January 2020 Science c Author(s) 2020. CC BY 4.0 License. Open Access Open Data 1 Spatial radionuclide deposition data from the 60 km area around the 2 Chernobyl nuclear power plant: results from a sampling survey in 1987. 3 4 Valery Kashparov1,3, Sviatoslav Levchuk1, Marina Zhurba1, Valentyn Protsak1, Nicholas A. 5 Beresford2, and Jacqueline S. Chaplow2 6 7 1 Ukrainian Institute of Agricultural Radiology of National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of 8 Ukraine, Mashinobudivnykiv str.7, Chabany, Kyiv region, 08162 Ukraine 9 2 UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster, 10 LA1 4AP, UK 11 3 CERAD CoE Environmental Radioactivity/Department of Environmental Sciences, Norwegian University of 12 Life Sciences, 1432 Aas, Norway 13 Correspondence to: Jacqueline S. Chaplow ([email protected]) 14 Abstract. The dataset “Spatial radionuclide deposition data from the 60 km area around the 15 Chernobyl nuclear power plant: results from a sampling survey in 1987” is the latest in a series of data 16 to be published by the Environmental Information Data Centre (EIDC) describing samples collected 17 and analysed following the Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident in 1986. The data result from a 18 survey carried out by the Ukrainian Institute of Agricultural Radiology (UIAR) in April and May 19 1987 and include information on sample sites, dose rate, radionuclide (zirconium-95, niobium-95, 20 ruthenium-106, caesium-134, caesium-137 and cerium-144) deposition, and exchangeable caesium- 21 134 and 137.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction of the Protective Shelter for the Chernobyl Nuclear Reactor Faces Schedule Delays, Potential Cost Increases, and Technical Uncertainties
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Ranking Member, GAO Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, House of Representatives July 2007 NUCLEAR SAFETY Construction of the Protective Shelter for the Chernobyl Nuclear Reactor Faces Schedule Delays, Potential Cost Increases, and Technical Uncertainties GAO-07-923 July 2007 NUCLEAR SAFETY Accountability Integrity Reliability Highlights Construction of the Protective Shelter for Highlights of GAO-07-923, a report to the the Chernobyl Nuclear Reactor Faces Ranking Member, Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs, Schedule Delays, Potential Cost Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, House of Representatives Increases, and Technical Uncertainties Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found In 1986, an explosion at the Although two of three construction components—site preparation and Chernobyl nuclear power plant in stabilization of the existing shelter—are nearly finished, construction of the Ukraine destroyed the reactor new shelter has fallen about 7 years behind schedule. Over the past couple building and released massive of years, the main reason for schedule slippage has been the failure to award amounts of radioactive a construction contract. The lack of a contract is partly the result of a contamination. A temporary lengthy disagreement between Ukraine and the European Bank for shelter was built over the damaged reactor to prevent further Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). In late 2006, the Chernobyl contamination. The United States nuclear power plant director told GAO that the donors should not make any is a major donor to an international additional contributions to the project until contracting issues were project to build a new shelter to resolved.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine
    Syracuse University SURFACE Religion College of Arts and Sciences 2005 Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine Samuel D. Gruber United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/rel Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Gruber, Samuel D., "Jewish Cemeteries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine" (2005). Full list of publications from School of Architecture. Paper 94. http://surface.syr.edu/arc/94 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religion by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JEWISH CEMETERIES, SYNAGOGUES, AND MASS GRAVE SITES IN UKRAINE United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Staff: Fayetteville, NY Jeffrey L. Farrow Michael B. Levy Executive Director Washington, DC Samuel Gruber Rachmiel
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES For map and other editors For international use Ukraine Kyiv “Kartographia” 2011 TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP AND OTHER EDITORS, FOR INTERNATIONAL USE UKRAINE State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prepared by Nina Syvak, Valerii Ponomarenko, Olha Khodzinska, Iryna Lakeichuk Scientific Consultant Iryna Rudenko Reviewed by Nataliia Kizilowa Translated by Olha Khodzinska Editor Lesia Veklych ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ © Kartographia, 2011 ISBN 978-966-475-839-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................ 5 2 The Ukrainian Language............................................ 5 2.1 General Remarks.............................................. 5 2.2 The Ukrainian Alphabet and Romanization of the Ukrainian Alphabet ............................... 6 2.3 Pronunciation of Ukrainian Geographical Names............................................................... 9 2.4 Stress .............................................................. 11 3 Spelling Rules for the Ukrainian Geographical Names....................................................................... 11 4 Spelling of Generic Terms ....................................... 13 5 Place Names in Minority Languages
    [Show full text]