Euro Crisis...Identity Crisis?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
EURO CRISIS…IDENTITY CRISIS? THE SINGLE CURRENCY AND EUROPEAN IDENTITIES IN GERMANY, IRELAND AND POLAND by CHARLOTTE AMY GALPIN A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Political Science and International Studies School of Government and Society College of Social Sciences University of Birmingham October 2014 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis examines the effect of the Euro crisis on the construction of European identities in three case study countries – Germany, Ireland and Poland. Combining a social constructivist approach to European identities with the constructivist and discursive institutionalist literature on ideational change and crisis, it investigates the extent to which the crisis constituted a ‘critical juncture’ for European identity discourses. Through extensive qualitative frame analysis of political and media discourse at key moments of the crisis, it examines how European identities are constructed through the debates about the crisis. The central argument is that the Euro crisis has had little effect on European identities because actors construct the crisis in their respective national contexts. In doing this, they draw on existing identities and ideas which then ‘endogenises’ the crisis into the existing national discourses. Where identity change is possible, it is subtle rather than a dramatic shift. Nevertheless, this does not mean that the EU has remained completely unified. Because the crisis generally serves to reinforce, rather than challenge, existing identities, attachments to national sovereignty and old national stereotypes have created or reinforced divisions particularly between northern and southern Europe and core and periphery. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisors, Dr. Tim Haughton and Dr. Isabelle Hertner, for their intellectual advice, guidance and feedback on my work as well as for always providing constant reassurance and unfailing encouragement. I am truly indebted to them for the support they have provided during the course of my PhD and particularly during the final year. I must also thank Professor Sarah Colvin, who co-supervised me for the first two years and without whom I would not have had the opportunity to start my PhD in the first place. Sarah was a vital source of advice and encouragement in the critical early stages. In addition, I would also like to thank Professor Thomas Risse, my advisor in Berlin during my two stays at the Free University Berlin, for his invaluable advice, and Professor Pawel Ireneusz Karolewski for his help and feedback during my time at the University of Wrocław. My PhD would not have been possible without the generous financial support I have received from the Institute for German Studies (IGS) and the School of Government and Society at the University of Birmingham, the Studienstiftung des Abgeordnetenhauses von Berlin and the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD). I am also extremely thankful for the supportive intellectual environments at the three universities at which I have been based, presented my work and sought advice. In particular, I am grateful to the IGS and the Department of Political Science and International Studies (POLSIS) at Birmingham, the Willy Brandt Centre (WBZ) for German and European Studies in Wrocław and the Kolleg-Forschergruppe (KfG) - The Transformative Power of Europe at the FU Berlin. In particular, I would like to thank colleagues at the IGS/POLSIS, including Dr. Sara Jones for always being ready with encouragement and advice, as well as members of the POLSIS PhD community, especially Cherry Miller, Josie Graef, Annie Gibney, Fran Avery, Liam Stanley, Laurence Cooley, David Norman, Jonna Nyman, and Ken Searle. I am also extremely grateful to the members of the KfG in Berlin who gave extremely helpful comments on my work. There are a number of people I would like to thank on a personal level for their support. I would like to thank the people in Berlin who made the year there special and provided enormous personal support in the final months, especially Olena Palko, Jonathan Eng, Marion Schumm, Leila Mukhida, and Matthieu Osmont. I would also like to thank the friends who made my time in Birmingham so memorable, especially Cory Hazlehurst, Shaz Rahman and the rest of the Birmingham for Democracy and B29 running groups. Special thanks must go to my two best friends, Lisa Birchall and Matt Benson, who have been a continual source of support, madness and amusement since we began our MAs together. In particular, I am indebted to Lisa’s intellectual input through the many hours of brainstorming and discussion of my work. Finally, I would like to thank my parents for their constant support, encouragement, repeated assistance when moving between countries and, most importantly, for their unconditional belief in my abilities. CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 The Euro Crisis and Identity ............................................................................................................... 1 Why Does Identity Matter? ................................................................................................................. 5 Theoretical and Empirical Contribution .............................................................................................. 9 Structure of the Thesis....................................................................................................................... 10 CHAPTER 2 – THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK: EUROPEAN IDENTITIES AT A TIME OF CRISIS ................... 13 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 14 Identity Change and Crisis – The Problem With Critical Junctures ................................................. 18 Actors, the Public Sphere and ‘Communicative Discourse’ ............................................................. 23 Constructing Crises – The Limited Possibility of Change in European Identities ............................ 28 European Identities in Germany, Ireland and Poland. ....................................................................... 35 Conclusion......................................................................................................................................... 43 CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODS - A COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY APPROACH .................................. 47 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 47 Case Studies and the Comparative Method ....................................................................................... 49 Data Collection .................................................................................................................................. 61 Data Analysis: Approaching Discourse ............................................................................................ 67 Conclusion......................................................................................................................................... 74 CHAPTER 4: HAS GERMANY FALLEN OUT OF LOVE WITH EUROPE? ..................................................... 76 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 76 The Normalisation Thesis and German Ordoliberalism .................................................................... 79 A European Crisis? ........................................................................................................................... 85 European Solidarity and the ‘Good European’ ................................................................................. 91 National, or Northern European? – What Kind of European Union? ............................................. 106 Conclusion....................................................................................................................................... 117 CHAPTER 5: IRISH IDENTITY AND THE UTILITY OF EUROPE................................................................. 120 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 120 Ireland and the Crisis – Domestic or European Factors? ................................................................ 123 A Domestic Crisis – A Crisis of Irish Identity? .............................................................................. 127 Irish Interests and the Utility of Europe .......................................................................................... 137 Irish Sovereignty and the Threat of Europe ...................................................................................