DOCSLIB.ORG

Varieties of Vegetables with Resistance to Disease.1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Varieties of Vegetables with Resistance to Disease.1 Archival copy: for current recommendations see http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu or your local extension office. PPP-63 Varieties of Vegetables with Resistance to Disease.1 P.D. Roberts and K.L. Pernezny.2 A list of vegetable varieties with resistance was compiled for bean, broccoli, carrot, cabbage, cucumber, lettuce, melons, pepper, squash, sweet corn, tomato, and watermelon. This information was obtained from the seed companies, primarily through catalogues. The seed company or sales representatives should be contacted for further information on specific varieties such as horticultural characteristics or type of resistance. A key to abbreviations of virus disease is included at the top of Table1. Entries with an * are tolerant and more information may be obtained from the seed company. 1. This document is PPP-63, one of a series of the Plant Pathology Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Publication Date: August 2001. Revised: December 2003. Please visit the EDIS Web site at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. 2. Pamela D. Roberts, Assistance Professor, Plant Pathology Department, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, Immokalee, and Kenneth L. Pernezny, Assistant Professor, Plant Pathology Department, Everglades Research and Education Center; Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32611. The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A. & M. University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Larry Arrington, Dean Archival copy: for current recommendations see http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu or your local extension office. Varieties of Vegetables with Resistance to Disease. 2 Table 1. VEGETABLE SEED COMPANY VARIETY DISEASE RESISTANCE OR TOLERANCE Beans Asgrow Brio Bean Common Mosaic Virus Bronco Bean Common Mosaic Virus Carlo Bean Common Mosaic Virus Cloudburst Bean Common Mosaic Virus Etna Bean Common Mosaic Virus Eureka Bean Common Mosaic Virus Goldmine Bean Common Mosaic Virus, Intermediate Resistance to Halo Blight Goldrush Bean Common Mosaic Virus Impact Bean Common Mosaic Virus Klondyke Bean Common Mosaic Virus Labrador Bean Common Mosaic Virus, Anthracnose Lodi Bean Common Mosaic Virus Magnum Bean Common Mosaic Virus Matador Bean Common Mosaic Virus Opus Bean Common Mosaic Virus, Intermediate Resistance to one or more Races of Bean Rust Podsquad Bean Common Mosaic Virus Rushmore Bean Common Mosaic Virus Stallion Bean Common Mosaic Virus, Intermediate Resistance to Halo Blight Storm Bean Common Mosaic Virus, one or more Races of Bean Rust Strike Bean Common Mosaic Virus Tema Bean Common Mosaic Virus Volcano Bean Common Mosaic Virus Zodiak Bean Common Mosaic Virus Harris Moran Seed Beeline Bean Common Mosaic Virus Company Daytona Bean Common Mosaic Virus Delinel (French) Bean Common Mosaic Virus, Anthracnose Derby Bean Common Mosaic Virus Envy Bean Common Mosaic Virus Espada Bean Common Mosaic, Halo Blight, Anthracose, Brown Spot Gator Green 15 Bean Common Mosaic Virus Golden Rod Wax Bean Common Mosaic Virus Archival copy: for current recommendations see http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu or your local extension office. Varieties of Vegetables with Resistance to Disease. 3 Table 1. Golden Sands (Wax) Bean Common Mosaic Virus Hialeah Bean Common Mosaic Virus, Brown Spot HM 5991 Bean Common Mosaic Virus, Halo Blight Hystyle Bean Common Mosaic Virus, Brown Spot Marseille (French) Bean Common Mosaic Virus, Halo Blight, Anthracnose Minuette Bean Common Mosaic, Halo Blight, Anthracose, Brown Spot Normandie (French) Bean Common Mosaic Virus, Halo Blight Nugget (Wax) Bean Common Mosaic Virus Pierre (French) Bean Common Mosaic Virus Probe Bean Common Mosaic Virus, Aphanomyces Root Rot, Brown Spot Prosperity Bean Common Mosaic Virus, Brown Spot Rapids Bean Common Mosaic Virus, Brown Spot Rocdor (Wax) Bean Common Mosaic Virus, Anthracnose Sable Bean Common Mosaic Virus, Halo Blight, Anthracnose Savannah Bean Common Mosaic Virus, Anthracnose Shade Bean Common Mosaic Virus Slenderella Bean Common Mosaic Virus, Halo Blight, Anthracnose Sonota Bean Common Mosaic Virus Symphony Bean Common Mosaic Virus Tenderlake Bean Common Mosaic Virus Trueblue Bean Common Mosaic Virus Vald'or (Wax) Bean Common Mosaic Virus Rogers Seeds Benchmark Several Races of Bean Common Mosaic Bush KY 125 Several Races of Bean Common Mosaic Calgreen Several Races of Bean Common Mosaic Goldkist (wax bean) Several Races of Bean Common Mosaic Indy Gold (wax bean) Several Races of Bean Common Mosaic Jade Several Races of Bean Common Mosaic, rust Kentucky Blue (pole bean) Bean Common Mosaic Race 1, rust Landmark Several Races of Bean Common Mosaic Mirada Several Races of Bean Common Mosaic Seville Several Races of Bean Common Mosaic Teseo Several Races of Bean Common Mosaic, Anthracnose Broccoli Rogers Seeds Everest Downy Mildew Archival copy: for current recommendations see http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu or your local extension office. Varieties of Vegetables with Resistance to Disease. 4 Table 1. Windsor Downy Mildew Sakata Seeds Arcadia Downy Mildew Decathlon Downy Mildew Nomad Downy Mildew Patriot Downy Mildew Sultan Downy Mildew Triathlon Downy Mildew CarRot Asgrow Caro-Choice Intermediate Resistance to Alternaria Leaf Blight Caropak Intermediate Resistance to Alternaria Leaf Blight Caro-Pride Intermediate Resistance to Alternaria Leaf Blight Cellobunch Intermediate Resistance to Alternaria Leaf Blight ConVerticillium Wilt Intermediate Resistance to Alternaria Leaf Blight Cumberland Intermediate Resistance to Alternaria Leaf Blight Eclipse Intermediate Resistance to Alternaria Leaf Blight First Class Intermediate Resistance to Alternaria Leaf Blight Heritage Intermediate Resistance to Alternaria Leaf Blight Premium Intermediate Resistance to Alternaria Leaf Blight PRot Intermediate Resistance to Alternaria Leaf Blight Snakpak Intermediate Resistance to Alternaria Leaf Blight Cabbage Abbott & Cobb Blue Vantage Fusarium Yellows, Black Rot, Black Speck, Tipburn Solid Blue #780 Fusarium Yellows, Black Rot, Black Speck, Tipburn Solid Blue #790 Fusarium Yellows, Black Rot Vantage Point Fusarium Yellows, Black Rot, Black Speck, Tipburn Asgrow Blue Bayou Intermediately Resistance to Fusarium Yellows, Black Rot Blue Dynasty Intermediately Resistance to Fusarium Yellows, Black Rot Red Dynasty Black Rot Harris Moran Seed Blue Pack Fusarium Yellows, Black Rot Company Blue Thunder Fusarium Yellows, Black Rot Bravo Fusarium Yellows, Black Rot Cardinal (Red) Fusarium Yellows Fortress Fusarium Yellows, Black Rot Gourmet Fusarium Yellows Heads Up Fusarium Yellows Archival copy: for current recommendations see http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu or your local extension office. Varieties of Vegetables with Resistance to Disease. 5 Table 1. Little Rock Y.R. Fusarium Yellows Market Prize Fusarium Yellows Talisman Fusarium Yellows, Black Rot*, Alternaria* Rogers Seeds Augusta Fusarium Yellows Dynamo Fusarium Yellows Green Boy Fusarium Yellows, Black Speck Izalco Fusarium Yellows, Black Rot*, Black Speck Pennant Fusarium Yellows, Tipburn Quisto Fusarium Yellows, Black Rot Rio Verde Fusarium Yellows, Black Speck Sakata Seeds Charmant Fusarium Yellows 1, Tipburn Emblem Fusarium Yellows 1, Black Rot Green Boy Fusarium Yellows 1, Tipburn Pacifica Fusarium Yellows 1, Black Rot Polaris Fusarium Yellows 1 Red Jewel (red) Tipburn Rookie (red) Tipburn Savoy King Tipburn Supreme Vantage Fusarium Yellows 1, Tipburn Sure Vantage Tipburn Cucumber Asgrow Cyclone Anthracnose Race 1(Intermediate Resistance), Cucumber Mosaic Virus, Downy Mildew, Powdery Mildew (Intermediate Resistance), Scab, Zucchini Yellow Mosaic Virus Discover M Anthracnose Race 1(Intermediate Resistance), Angular Leaf Spot(Intermediate Resistance), Cucumber Mosaic Virus (Intermediate Resistance), Downy Mildew, Powdery Mildew (Intermediate Resistance), Scab Excel M Anthracnose Race 1(Intermediate Resistance), Angular Leaf Spot(Intermediate Resistance), Cucumber Mosaic Virus (Intermediate Resistance), Downy Mildew (Intermediate Resistance), Powdery Mildew (Intermediate Resistance), Scab Francipak Anthracnose Race 1(Intermediate Resistance), Angular Leaf Spot(Intermediate Resistance), Cucumber Mosaic Virus (Intermediate Resistance), Downy Mildew (Intermediate Resistance), Powdery Mildew (Intermediate Resistance), Scab Lightning Cucumber Mosaic Virus, Downy Mildew (Intermediate Resistance), Powdery Mildew (Intermediate Resistance), Scab, Zucchini Yellow Mosaic Virus (Intermediate Resistance) Archival copy: for current recommendations see http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu or your local extension office. Varieties of Vegetables with Resistance to Disease. 6 Table 1. Meteor Anthracnose Race 1(Intermediate Resistance), Angular Leaf Spot(Intermediate Resistance), Cucumber Mosaic Virus (Intermediate Resistance), Downy Mildew, Powdery Mildew , Scab, Target Leaf Spot Sprint 440 Anthracnose Race 1(Intermediate Resistance), Angular Leaf Spot(Intermediate Resistance), Cucumber Mosaic Virus (Intermediate Resistance), Downy Mildew (Intermediate Resistance),
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Handling of Apple Transport Techniques and Efficiency Vibration, Damage and Bruising Texture, Firmness and Quality
    Centre of Excellence AGROPHYSICS for Applied Physics in Sustainable Agriculture Handling of Apple transport techniques and efficiency vibration, damage and bruising texture, firmness and quality Bohdan Dobrzañski, jr. Jacek Rabcewicz Rafa³ Rybczyñski B. Dobrzañski Institute of Agrophysics Polish Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence AGROPHYSICS for Applied Physics in Sustainable Agriculture Handling of Apple transport techniques and efficiency vibration, damage and bruising texture, firmness and quality Bohdan Dobrzañski, jr. Jacek Rabcewicz Rafa³ Rybczyñski B. Dobrzañski Institute of Agrophysics Polish Academy of Sciences PUBLISHED BY: B. DOBRZAŃSKI INSTITUTE OF AGROPHYSICS OF POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ACTIVITIES OF WP9 IN THE CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE AGROPHYSICS CONTRACT NO: QLAM-2001-00428 CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE FOR APPLIED PHYSICS IN SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE WITH THE th ACRONYM AGROPHYSICS IS FOUNDED UNDER 5 EU FRAMEWORK FOR RESEARCH, TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION ACTIVITIES GENERAL SUPERVISOR OF THE CENTRE: PROF. DR. RYSZARD T. WALCZAK, MEMBER OF POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES PROJECT COORDINATOR: DR. ENG. ANDRZEJ STĘPNIEWSKI WP9: PHYSICAL METHODS OF EVALUATION OF FRUIT AND VEGETABLE QUALITY LEADER OF WP9: PROF. DR. ENG. BOHDAN DOBRZAŃSKI, JR. REVIEWED BY PROF. DR. ENG. JÓZEF KOWALCZUK TRANSLATED (EXCEPT CHAPTERS: 1, 2, 6-9) BY M.SC. TOMASZ BYLICA THE RESULTS OF STUDY PRESENTED IN THE MONOGRAPH ARE SUPPORTED BY: THE STATE COMMITTEE FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH UNDER GRANT NO. 5 P06F 012 19 AND ORDERED PROJECT NO. PBZ-51-02 RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF POMOLOGY AND FLORICULTURE B. DOBRZAŃSKI INSTITUTE OF AGROPHYSICS OF POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ©Copyright by BOHDAN DOBRZAŃSKI INSTITUTE OF AGROPHYSICS OF POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES LUBLIN 2006 ISBN 83-89969-55-6 ST 1 EDITION - ISBN 83-89969-55-6 (IN ENGLISH) 180 COPIES, PRINTED SHEETS (16.8) PRINTED ON ACID-FREE PAPER IN POLAND BY: ALF-GRAF, UL.
    [Show full text]
  • INF03 Reduce Lists of Apple Varieites
    ECE/TRADE/C/WP.7/GE.1/2009/INF.3 Specialized Section on Standardization of Fresh Fruit and Vegetables Fifty-fifth session Geneva, 4 - 8 May 2009 Items 4(a) of the provisional agenda REVISION OF UNECE STANDARDS Proposals on the list of apple varieties This note has been put together by the secretariat following the decision taken by the Specialized Section at its fifty-fourth session to collect information from countries on varieties that are important in international trade. Replies have been received from the following countries: Canada, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Slovakia, South Africa, Sweden, Switzerland and the USA. This note also includes the documents compiled for the same purpose and submitted to the fifty-second session of the Specialized Section. I. Documents submitted to the 52nd session of the Specialized Section A. UNECE Standard for Apples – List of Varieties At the last meeting the 51 st session of the Specialized Section GE.1 the delegation of the United Kingdom offered to coordinate efforts to simplify the list of apple varieties. The aim was to see what the result would be if we only include the most important varieties that are produced and traded. The list is designed to help distinguish apple varieties by colour groups, size and russeting it is not exhaustive, non-listed varieties can still be marketed. The idea should not be to list every variety grown in every country. The UK asked for views on what were considered to be the most important top thirty varieties. Eight countries sent their views, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, USA, Slovakia, Germany Finland and the Czech Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Analysis of a Major International Collection of Cultivated Apple Varieties Reveals Previously Unknown Historic Heteroploid and Inbred Relationships
    Genetic analysis of a major international collection of cultivated apple varieties reveals previously unknown historic heteroploid and inbred relationships Article Published Version Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY) Open Access Ordidge, M., Kirdwichai, P., Baksh, M. F., Venison, E. P., Gibbings, J. G. and Dunwell, J. M. (2018) Genetic analysis of a major international collection of cultivated apple varieties reveals previously unknown historic heteroploid and inbred relationships. PLoS ONE, 13 (9). e0202405. ISSN 1932-6203 doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202405 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/78594/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202405 Publisher: Public Library of Science All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online Genetic analysis of a major international collection of cultivated apple varieties reveals previously unknown historic heteroploid and inbred relationships Article Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY) Ordidge, M., Kirdwichai, P., Baksh, M. F., Venison, E. P., Gibbings, J. G. and Dunwell, J. M. (2018) Genetic analysis of a major international collection of cultivated apple varieties reveals previously unknown historic heteroploid and inbred relationships. PLOS ONE, 13 (9).
    [Show full text]
  • Delinquent Current Year Real Property
    Delinquent Current Year Real Property Tax as of February 1, 2021 PRIMARY OWNER SECONDARY OWNER PARCEL ID TOTAL DUE SITUS ADDRESS 11 WESTVIEW LLC 964972494700000 1,550.02 11 WESTVIEW RD ASHEVILLE NC 1115 INVESTMENTS LLC 962826247600000 1,784.57 424 DEAVERVIEW RD ASHEVILLE NC 120 BROADWAY STREET LLC 061935493200000 630.62 99999 BROADWAY ST BLACK MOUNTAIN NC 13:22 LEGACIES LLC 967741958700000 2,609.06 48 WESTSIDE VILLAGE RD UNINCORPORATED 131 BROADWAY LLC 061935599200000 2,856.73 131 BROADWAY ST BLACK MOUNTAIN NC 1430 MERRIMON AVENUE LLC 973095178600000 2,759.07 1430 MERRIMON AVE ASHEVILLE NC 146 ROBERTS LLC 964807218300000 19,180.16 146 ROBERTS ST ASHEVILLE NC 146 ROBERTS LLC 964806195600000 17.24 179 ROBERTS ST ASHEVILLE NC 161 LOGAN LLC 964784681600000 1,447.39 617 BROOKSHIRE ST ASHEVILLE NC 18 BRENNAN BROKE ME LLC 962964621500000 2,410.41 18 BRENNAN BROOK DR UNINCORPORATED 180 HOLDINGS LLC 963816782800000 12.94 99999 MAURICET LN ASHEVILLE NC 233 RIVERSIDE LLC 963889237500000 17,355.27 350 RIVERSIDE DR ASHEVILLE NC 27 DEER RUN DRIVE LLC 965505559900000 2,393.79 27 DEER RUN DR ASHEVILLE NC 28 HUNTER DRIVE REVOCABLE TRUST 962421184100000 478.17 28 HUNTER DR UNINCORPORATED 29 PAGE AVE LLC 964930087300000 12,618.97 29 PAGE AVE ASHEVILLE NC 299 OLD HIGHWAY 20 LLC 971182306200000 2,670.65 17 STONE OWL TRL UNINCORPORATED 2M HOME INVESTMENTS LLC 970141443400000 881.74 71 GRAY FOX DR UNINCORPORATED 311 ASHEVILLE CONDO LLC 9648623059C0311 2,608.52 311 BOWLING PARK RD ASHEVILLE NC 325 HAYWOOD CHECK THE DEED! LLC 963864649400000 2,288.38 325 HAYWOOD
    [Show full text]
  • Standardized Parent Company Names for TRI Reporting
    Standardized Parent Company Names for TRI Reporting This alphabetized list of TRI Reporting Year (RY) 2011 Parent Company names is provided here as a reference for facilities filing their RY 2012 reports using paper forms. For RY 2012, the Agency is emphasizing the importance of accurate names for Parent Companies. Your facility may or may not have a Parent Company. Also, if you do have a Parent Company, please note that it is not necessarily listed here. Instructions Search for your standardized company name by pressing the CTRL+F keys. If your Parent Company is on this list, please write the name exactly as spelled and abbreviated here in Section 5.1 of the appropriate TRI Reporting Form. If your Parent Company is not on this list, please clearly write out the name of your parent company. In either case, please use ALL CAPITAL letters and DO NOT use periods. Please consult the most recent TRI Reporting Forms and Instructions (http://www.epa.gov/tri/report/index.htm) if you need additional information on reporting for reporting Parent Company names. Find your standardized company name on the alphabetical list below, or search for a name by pressing the CTRL+F keys Standardized Parent Company Names 3A COMPOSITES USA INC 3F CHIMICA AMERICAS INC 3G MERMET CORP 3M CO 5N PLUS INC A & A MANUFACTURING CO INC A & A READY MIX INC A & E CUSTOM TRUCK A & E INC A FINKL & SONS CO A G SIMPSON AUTOMOTIVE INC A KEY 3 CASTING CO A MATRIX METALS CO LLC A O SMITH CORP A RAYMOND TINNERMAN MANUFACTURING INC A SCHULMAN INC A TEICHERT & SON INC A TO Z DRYING
    [Show full text]
  • Founding Clones, Inbreeding, Coancestry, and Status Number of Modern Apple Cultivars
    J. AMER. SOC. HORT. SCI. 121(5):773–782. 1996. Founding Clones, Inbreeding, Coancestry, and Status Number of Modern Apple Cultivars Dominique A.M. Noiton The Horticulture and Food Research Institute of New Zealand Ltd, Havelock North Research Center, Havelock North, New Zealand Peter A. Alspach The Horticulture and Food Research Institute of New Zealand Ltd, Riwaka Research Center, Motueka, New Zealand Additional index words. breeding, genetic diversity, Malus ×domestica Abstract. Pedigrees of apple (Malus ×domestica Borkh.) cultivars were used to study worldwide genetic diversity among clones used in modern apple breeding. The most frequent founding clones were ‘Cox’s Orange Pippin’, ‘Golden Delicious’, ‘Red Delicious’, ‘Jonathan’, and ‘McIntosh’. Coefficients of coancestry between 50 mainstream cultivars and these clones averaged 0.03, 0.12, 0.07, 0.06, and 0.02, respectively, but they were frequently as high as 0.25 with certain pairings. Among a group of 27 cultivars carrying the Vf gene for scab resistance, coefficients of coancestry with the five founding clones were of the same order. Although few of the cultivars sampled were substantially inbred, inbreeding could reach serious levels in their future offspring if current breeding practices are continued. The status effective number was 8 for the mainstream group and 7 for the Vf-carrier clones. This indicates clearly that apple breeders are operating with a population of greatly reduced genetic diversity. Careful consideration of pedigrees and increased size of the genetic base are needed in future apple breeding strategies. The domestic apple (Malus ×domestica), one of the world’s floribunda 821 x ‘Rome Beauty’.
    [Show full text]
  • Apple Pollination Groups
    Flowering times of apples RHS Pollination Groups To ensure good pollination and therefore a good crop, it is essential to grow two or more different cultivars from the same Flowering Group or adjacent Flowering Groups. Some cultivars are triploid – they have sterile pollen and need two other cultivars for good pollination; therefore, always grow at least two other non- triploid cultivars with each one. Key AGM = RHS Award of Garden Merit * Incompatible with each other ** Incompatible with each other *** ‘Golden Delicious’ may be ineffective on ‘Crispin’ (syn. ‘Mutsu’) Flowering Group 1 Very early; pollinated by groups 1 & 2 ‘Gravenstein’ (triploid) ‘Lord Suffield’ ‘Manks Codlin’ ‘Red Astrachan’ ‘Stark Earliest’ (syn. ‘Scarlet Pimpernel’) ‘Vista Bella’ Flowering Group 2 Pollinated by groups 1,2 & 3 ‘Adams's Pearmain’ ‘Alkmene’ AGM (syn. ‘Early Windsor’) ‘Baker's Delicious’ ‘Beauty of Bath’ (partial tip bearer) ‘Beauty of Blackmoor’ ‘Ben's Red’ ‘Bismarck’ ‘Bolero’ (syn. ‘Tuscan’) ‘Cheddar Cross’ ‘Christmas Pearmain’ ‘Devonshire Quarrenden’ ‘Egremont Russet’ AGM ‘George Cave’ (tip bearer) ‘George Neal’ AGM ‘Golden Spire’ ‘Idared’ AGM ‘Irish Peach’ (tip bearer) ‘Kerry Pippin’ ‘Keswick Codling’ ‘Laxton's Early Crimson’ ‘Lord Lambourne’ AGM (partial tip bearer) ‘Maidstone Favourite’ ‘Margil’ ‘Mclntosh’ ‘Red Melba’ ‘Merton Charm’ ‘Michaelmas Red’ ‘Norfolk Beauty’ ‘Owen Thomas’ ‘Reverend W. Wilks’ ‘Ribston Pippin’ AGM (triploid, partial tip bearer) ‘Ross Nonpareil’ ‘Saint Edmund's Pippin’ AGM (partial tip bearer) ‘Striped Beefing’ ‘Warner's King’ AGM (triploid) ‘Washington’ (triploid) ‘White Transparent’ Flowering Group 3 Pollinated by groups 2, 3 & 4 ‘Acme’ ‘Alexander’ (syn. ‘Emperor Alexander’) ‘Allington Pippin’ ‘Arthur Turner’ AGM ‘Barnack Orange’ ‘Baumann's Reinette’ ‘Belle de Boskoop’ AGM (triploid) ‘Belle de Pontoise’ ‘Blenheim Orange’ AGM (triploid, partial tip bearer) ‘Bountiful’ ‘Bowden's Seedling’ ‘Bramley's Seedling’ AGM (triploid, partial tip bearer) ‘Brownlees Russett’ ‘Charles Ross’ AGM ‘Cox's Orange Pippin’ */** ‘Crispin’ (syn.
    [Show full text]
  • Applied to the Buying-In Prices for Fruit and Vegetables 1 . in Annex VIII, The
    24 . 6 . 89 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 177/37 COMMISSION REGULATION ( EEC) No 1822/89 of 23 June 1989 amending Regulation ( EEC) No 3587/86 fixing the conversion factors to be applied to the buying-in prices for fruit and vegetables THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES , grapes produced with a view to the obligatory distillation of wine made from table grapes ; Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, Whereas the Management Committee for Fruit and Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1035/72 Vegetables has not delivered an opinion within the time of 18 May 1972 on the common organization of the limit set by its chairman, market in fruit and vegetables ('), as last amended by Regulation ( EEC) No 1 1 19/89 (2), and in particular Article HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION : 16 (4) thereof, Whereas Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3587/86 (J), Article 1 as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 2040/88 (4), fixes the conversion factors permitting the calculation of the Regulation (EEC) No 3587/86 is hereby amended as prices at which products with characteristics different follows : from those of products used for the fixing of the basic 1 . In Annex VIII, the list of varieties of large pears is and buying-in prices are bought in ; replaced by the list set out in Annex I hereto . Whereas Commission Regulation ( EEC) No 920/89 (5) lays down quality standards for citrus fruit, apples and 2. The first indent of point (b) in Annexe IX is replaced pears ; whereas the provisions of Regulation (EEC) No by the following : 3587/86 should accordingly by adapted to those II .
    [Show full text]
  • 2013-2014 Citizen Survey
    Jupiter, FL Key Findings March 2014 About The NCS • Community Livability • Community Residents Characteristics • Governance Private • Participation sector Communities are partnerships among… Community- based organizations Government 2 Facets of Community Livability Safety Mobility Community Engagement Natural Quality of Environment Community Overall Education and Built Enrichment Environment Recreation and Wellness Economy 3 The NCS & Jupiter • Participant in The NCS since 2009 • 2009, 2011, 2013 • Random sample of 3,000 households in 2013 • Mail with web option • 745 returned surveys; 27% response rate • ±4% margin of error 4 National and Florida Benchmark Comparisons 5 Geographic Areas of Jupiter Four subareas 1. CRA and coastal communities 2. Northern Loxahatchee River/Riverside Drive communities/Central Jupiter & charter neighborhoods 3. Western communities & The Shores/Heights, Hamptons, Indian Creek and Loxahatchee Club 4. Abacoa/Admirals' Cove & Bears Club 6 Key Finding #1 Jupiter residents continue to enjoy a high quality of life 7 Jupiter Overall 94% Excellent or Good Place to live 97% Quality of Life Overall image 91% Excellent 51% Overall Poor 90% 1% appearance Neighborhood 89% Fair Place to raise 5% 89% children Place to retire 88% Good 43% Percent excellent or good = National benchmark comparison = Florida benchmark comparison 8 Strong Economy Place to visit 90% Ratings for all characteristics above the national benchmark Overall economic 80% health Place to work 73% Percent excellent or good 9 Current and Future Downtown
    [Show full text]
  • Fruit Trees & Soft Fruit
    Our helpful guide to FRUIT TREES & SOFT FRUIT APPLE ‘Egremont Russet’ AGM All your requirements for your orchard or fruit garden. ‘Adam’s Permain’ Dessert. A 19th C. variety. Bright red nutty aromatic Dessert. Small/medium golden russet fruit with a Potted fruit trees for planting all year round and bare-rooted apple. Pick October. Use until March. Hardy and sweet and nutty flavour. Upright grower producing disease resistant. Pollination Group 2. good crops. Pick late Sept. Use October/December. for planting during the dormant season. These include a range 6 Pollination Group 2. of local apple varieties. We also have potted soft fruit bushes ‘Blue Moon’ ‘Fiesta’ AGM including Gooseberries, Blackcurrants, Red and White Currants, Apple (Starline). Purple-Blue fruit, crisp and sweet/ sharp harvest August to September. Self-fertile and Dessert with medium-large fruits with a ‘Cox’ type Blueberries, Raspberries, Blackberry and Tayberry. disease resistant. Columnar habit. flavour that is almost as good. Crop heavy and reliable. Pick early October keeps until February. ‘Bountiful’ Disease resistance fair. Pollination Group 3. Cooking. Large green and red sweet fruit. Compact growth makes this a good choice for small gardens. ‘Greenfinch’ Heavy cropper. Good pollinator. Pick late Sept. Use Apple (Starline). Heavy cropping with large green, FRUIT TREE ROOTSTOCKS, TREE SIZES Sept/Jan. Pollination Group 2. crisp, slightly acidic apples. Harvest September to AND POLLINATION October. Self-fertile and disease resistant. Columnar ‘Bramley’s Seedling’ AGM habit. Great for restricted spaces. To keep fruit tree sizes under control for most Ideally, trees should be from the same or adjoining Cooking.
    [Show full text]
  • Fruit and Vegetable Show Schedule 2021
    The RHS Fruit and Vegetable Show Schedules 2021 Summer Fruit and Vegetable Competition 21-25 July 2021 RHS Flower Show Tatton Park Autumn Fruit and Vegetable Competition 1-3 October 2021 RHS Garden Hyde Hall As part of Taste of Autumn Late Fruit and Vegetable Competition 28-31 October 2021 RHS Garden Harlow Carr Judged under the Rules and Regulations of the RHS Horticultural Show Handbook, 8th Edition, unless otherwise stated in the schedule Please note: This schedule is available as a hard copy by request. All requests should go to Georgina Barter. email: [email protected] tel: 020 7821 3142 You can also print sections of this document by selecting ‘print custom range’ and entering a page selection, e.g. 1-5 CONTENTS Regulations for competitive exhibits Regulations 3 Admission 7 Cups, Trophies and Prizes 8 Classified list of gooseberries 9 List of dessert and cooking cultivars of apples, pears and plums 10 Constitution of dishes - fruit 15 Constitution of dishes - vegetables 16 Summer Fruit and Vegetable Competition Timetable 19 Classes 20 Autumn Fruit and Vegetable Competition Timetable 25 Classes 26 Late Fruit and Vegetable Competition Timetable 36 Classes 37 RHS Fruit Group information 43 Show schedule meeting Chairman: Mr C Spires Vice-Chairman: Mr R M Williams MBE Mr D Allison, Mr J Arbury, Mr R H Bailey, Mr A Baggaley Dr P R Dawson, Mr G M Edwards, Mr I Mace, Mr B Newman, Mr D Thornton, Secretary: Mrs G Barter 2 REGULATIONS FOR COMPETITIVE EXHIBITS Exhibitors 1. Eligibility of competitors - Subject to the conditions laid down elsewhere in the Schedule, the competitive classes are open to all whether Members of the Society or not.
    [Show full text]
  • Most Recent Item 2015-2016 Citizen Survey
    1 Jupiter, FL Key Findings 2016 The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA About The NCS . Community Livability Residents . Community Characteristics . Governance Private Communities Community- based sector are partnerships . Participation among... organizations Government 2 Facets of Community Livability Recreation Safety Mobility Economy Quality of and Wellness Community Overall Education Natural Built Community and Environment Environment Engagement Enrichment 3 The NCS & Jupiter . Participant in The NCS since 2009 . 2009, 2011, 2013, 2015 . Scientific sample of 2,600 households . 547 returned surveys; 24% response rate . ±4% margin of error Expanded Online Geographic sample option comparisons Custom Presentation benchmarks 4 Geographic Areas Four Areas 1. CRA and coastal communities 2. Northern Loxahatchee River/Riverside Drive communities/Central Jupiter & charter neighborhoods 3. Western communities & The Shores/Heights, Hamptons, Indian Creek and Loxahatchee Club 4. Abacoa/Admirals' Cove & Bears Club 5 National and Florida Benchmark Comparisons 6 2015 National Benchmark Comparisons 24 received higher 106 3 received similar ratings received ratings lower ratings 7 2015 Florida Benchmark Comparisons 65 received higher 67 1 received similar ratings received ratings lower ratings 8 2015 Ratings Compared to 2013 11 received higher 115 7 received similar ratings received ratings lower ratings 9 Legend Key Focus Areas Higher than national benchmark Similar to national benchmark Lower than national benchmark Most important
    [Show full text]