DOCSLIB.ORG

The Development and Extension of Leon Trotsky's Theory of Permanent Revolution" Was Originally Published As a Four-Part Series in the SUU.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

International Communist League Pamphlet il ':'·"·i:~:f\:h"'" I International Communisf~e~gues:: Ine Down With Executi,veOffic:IJs of the Capitalist State! .. ............ AUSTRAlIA ... A$2 BRITAIN ... £1.50 CANADA ... CDN$2 IRELAND ... €1.50 SOUTH AFRICA ... R4 USA ... US$2 II, !Ii lill Ii - lilll - iii.. Introduction This pamphlet consists of three articles from the press of the Interna­ tional Communist League (Fourth Internationalist) and our American sec­ tion, the Spartacist League/U.S. "The Development and Extension of Leon Trotsky's Theory of Permanent Revolution" was originally published as a four-part series in the SUU.S. press (Workers Vanguard Nos. 901-904, 26 October-7 December 2007). It has also been published in Spanish in the press of our Mexican section, the Grupo Espartaquista de Mexico (Espartaco No. 29, April 2008). "Rearming Bolshevism-A Trotskyist Critique of Germany 1923 and the Comintern" was published in Sparta­ Gist ([English-language edition] No. 56, Spring 2001). Spartacist is the ICL's theoretical and documentary repository, published in English, Span­ ish, French and German. "Down With Executive Offices of the Capitalist State!" published here in slightly edited form consists of sections from the Spartacist article, "Maintaining a Revolutionary Program in the Post­ Soviet Period" (Spartacist[English-language edition] No. 60, Autumn 2007), which reported on the most recent international conference of the ICL. We also publish here (reprinted from the same issue of Spartacist) an excerpt dealing with the question of executive offices from the main docu­ ment adopted at that conference. These articles together constitute an introduction to the historically founded principles and program of Trotskyism, the continuity of revolu­ tionary Marxism in our time. Because they illustrate core elements of our program, built on the fight for complete and unconditional independence of the proletariat from all the parties and agencies of the capitalist class enemy, they illuminate the political gulf between the ICL and all the opportunists·who falsely claim to be Marxists and to represent the historic interests of the working class. The understanding that the revolutionary working class cannot reform the capitalist state to serve its own interests but must smash that state power and create its own state-a workers state-is fundamental to our outlook. In contrast, our political oppo­ nents on the left practice what Trotsky described as "the actual training of the masses to become imbued with the inviolability of the bourgeois state" (Lessons of October, 1924). Spartaclst Publishing Co., Box 1377 GPO, New York, NY 10116 • April 2008 Cover graphic: Bolshevik slogans were prominent among banners celebrating May Day in Petrograd, 1917. Among those pictured: "For the Arming of the People/Long Live the International," "Russian Social Democratic Labor Party [Bolsheviks] of Kronstadt Proletarians." Inset: Leon Trotsky in Moscow shortly after the Russian Revolution. Cover credits: Novosti (main photo). Basil Blackwell Inc. (inset) --- 3 The Development, and Extension of leon Trotsk1'sTheory of Penrtane .t Revolution This month marks the 90th Just before Results and anniversary of the Russian Prospects appeared, the 1905 Revolution led by the Bol­ Russian Revolution had shak­ shevik Party of V. I. Lenin en the tsarist empire to its and Leon Trotsky. The Octo­ foundations and brought to ber Revolution was the defin­ the fore an intense debate over ing event of the 20th century. the future course of revolu­ tionary developments. Rus­ sia was an imperialist power PART ONE but also the weakest link in the imperialist chain, saddled Spurred especially by the car­ with an absolutist monarchy, nage of World War I, the work­ an encrusted landed aristoc­ ing class took state power, racy and a huge Russian Or­ establishing the dictatorship thodox state church. of the proletariat. In doing so, The young, vibrant bour­ the multinational proletariat geoisies of 17th-century Eng­ of Russia not only liberated land and 18th-century France itself from capitalist exploi­ had stood at the head of the tation but also led the peas­ urban and rural populace in antry, national minorities and bourgeois-democratic revo­ all the oppressed in driving Leon Trotsky in jail in aftermath of 1905 Revolution. lutions that swept away simi­ out feudal tyranny and impe­ Trotsky's 1906 Our Revolution (top inset) included lar feudal-derived fetters on rialist bondage. Results and Prospects, which explained theory of modern capitalist develop­ The young workers state . permanent revolution and was republished under ment and would give rise carried out an agrarian revo­ title shown (bottom inset) in Moscow in 1921. to an industrial proletariat. lution and recognized the right But the late-emerging Rus­ of self-determination of all nations in what had been the tsar­ sian bourgeoisie-subordinated to foreign industrialists and ist prison house of peoples. The soviet regime took Russia bankers, tied by a thousand threads to the aristocracy-was out of the interimperialist world war and inspired class­ weak and cowardly, fearful that it, too, would be swept away conscious workers in other countries to try to follow the should the worker and peasant masses rise up against the Bolshevik example. The Third (Communist) International, tsarist autocracy. which held its inaugural congress in Moscow in 1919, was Addressing this contradiction, Trotsky argued, as he later founded to lead the proletariat internationally in the struggle summarized in the August 1939 article "Three Conceptions for socialist revolution. of the Russian Revolution" (also known as ''Three Concepts"): The October Revolution was a stunning confirmation of "The complete victory of the democratic revolution in Russia is the theory and perspective of permanent revolution devel­ inconceivable otherwise than in the form of the dictatorship of oped by Trotsky. In his 1906 work Results and Prospects, the proletariat basing itself on the peasantry. The dictatorship of Trotsky projected that because Russia, despite its economic the proletariat, which will inescapably place on the order of the day not only democratic but also socialist tasks, will at the same backwardness, was already part of a world capitalist econ­ time provide a mighty impulse to the international socialist revo­ omy that was ripe for socialism, the workers could come to lution. Only the victory of the proletariat in the West will shield power there before an extended period of capitalist develop­ Russia from bourgeois restoration and secure for her the pos­ ment. Indeed, the workers would have .to come to power if sibility of bringing the socialist construction to its conclusion." Russia was to be liberated from its feudal past. At the heart As the Bolsheviks anticipated, the October Revolution of the Bolsheviks' success in 1917 was the coming together inspired proletarian upheavals in Europe, particularly Ger­ of Trotsky's program of permanent revolution with Lenin's many, as well as anti-colonial and national liberation strug­ single-minded struggle to build a programmatically steeled gles in Asia and elsewhere. But despite the revolutionary fer­ and tested vanguard party against all manner of reconcilia­ ment, the proletariat did not come to power in any of the tion with the capitalist order. advanced capitalist countries of the West. Russia, bled white 4 Combined and uneven development in Mexico: GM plant in Matamoros (left), peasants plowing cornfield using horses and wooden Implements in the state of Mexico, May 2007. by imperialist war and the bloody Civil War that erupted a few capitalism extended its tentacles into ever more remote months after the Bolsheviks took power, remained isolated. regions of the globe. This was seen decisively in China, Conditions of great material scarcity produced strong objec­ where a young urban proletariat had emerged in the years tive pressures toward bureaucratism. The failure to consum­ during and after World War I. But unlike the Bolshevik Revo­ mate an exceptional opportunity for socialist revolution in lution, the Chinese Revolution of 1925-27 went down to Germany in 1923 allowed a restabilization of the world capi­ bloody defeat. The crucial reason, as we will detail later in talist order and led to profound demoralization among Soviet this article, is that the proletariat was subordinated to the workers. This facilitated a political counterrevolution and the bourgeoisie instead of fighting for power in its own name and rise of a privileged bureaucratic caste around Joseph Stalin. leading the mass of the peasantry. Drawing the lessons of that In late 1924, Stalin promulgated the dogma of "socialism defeat, in The Third International After Lenin (1928) and The in one country." This flouted the Marxist understanding that Permanent Revolution (1930), Trotsky generalized the the­ socialism-a classless society of material abundance--could ory of permanent revolution to all countries of belated capi­ only be built on the basis of the most modem technology and talist development in the imperialist epoch. an international division of labor, requiring proletarian revo­ The validity of this revolutionary perspective has been lutions in at least a number of the most advanced capitalist repeatedly demonstrated in the decades since. Dozens of for­ countries. Stalin and his henchmen suppressed proletarian mer colonies have achieved independent statehood, including democracy and, over the years, transformed
Recommended publications
  • Reichman on Linden, 'Western Marxism and the Soviet Union: a Survey of Critial Theories and Debates Since 1917'

    Reichman on Linden, 'Western Marxism and the Soviet Union: a Survey of Critial Theories and Debates Since 1917'

    H-Russia Reichman on Linden, 'Western Marxism and the Soviet Union: A Survey of Critial Theories and Debates since 1917' Review published on Monday, November 10, 2008 Marcel van der Linden. Western Marxism and the Soviet Union: A Survey of Critial Theories and Debates since 1917. Leiden: Brill, 2007. ix + 380 pp. $139.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-90-04-15875-7. Reviewed by Henry Reichman Published on H-Russia (November, 2008) Commissioned by Nellie H. Ohr A Fading Tradition This is a revised, corrected, updated, and expanded version of a work that began as a PhD dissertation and was originally published in Dutch in 1989 and again in German in 1992. Marcel van der Linden, a labor historian at Amsterdam University and executive editor of theInternational Review of Social History, summarizes an extraordinarily broad range of Western Marxist thinkers in an effort to understand how Marxists who were politically independent of the Soviet Union "theoretically interpreted developments in the Soviet Union" (p. 4). Noting that "in the history of ideas Marxist theories have not received the attention they deserve" (p. 2) and that "the 'Russian Question' was an absolutely central problem for Marxism in the twentieth century" (p. 1), van der Linden seeks simultaneously to shed light on both the Soviet experience and "the historical development of Marxist thought" (p. 1), succeeding perhaps more in the latter goal than the former. The book opens with a brief introduction, which postulates that the development of Western Marxist thinking about the Soviet Union was shaped by three "contextual clusters:" 1) "The general theory of the forms of society (modes of production) and their succession" adopted by differing Marxist thinkers; 2) the changing "perception of stability and dynamism of Western capitalism"; and 3) the various ways "in which the stability and dynamism of Soviet society was perceived" (pp.
  • Colloquium Paper January 12, 1984 STALINISM VERSUS

    Colloquium Paper January 12, 1984 STALINISM VERSUS

    Colloquium Paper January 12, 1984 STALINISM VERSUS BOLSHEVISM? A Reconsideration by Robert C. Tucker Princeton University with comment by Peter Reddaway London School of Economics and Political Science Fellows Kennan Institute for Advanced Russian Studies Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Draft paper not for publication or quotation without written permission from the authors. STALINISM VERSUS BOLSHEVISM? A Reconsideration Although not of ten openly debated~ the issue I propose to address is probably the deepest and most divisive in Soviet studies. There is good ground for Stephen Cohen's characterization of it as a "quintessential his­ torical and interpretive question"! because it transcends most of the others and has to do with the whole of Russia's historical development since the Bolshevik Revolution. He formulates it as the question of the relationship "between Bolshevism and Stalinism.'' Since the very existence of something properly called Stalinism is at issue here, I prefer a somewhat different mode of formulation. There are two (and curiously, only two) basically opposed positions on the course of development that Soviet Russia took starting around 1929 when Stalin, having ousted his opponents on the Left and the Right, achieved primacy, although not yet autocratic primacy, within the Soviet regime. The first position, Which may be seen as the orthodox one, sees that course of development as the fulfillment, under new conditions, of Lenin's Bolshevism. All the main actions taken by the Soviet regime under Stalin's leadership were, in other words, the fulfillment of what had been prefigured in Leninism (as Lenin's Bolshevism came to be called after Lenin died).
  • Leon Trotsky Three Concepts of the Russian Revolution 1

    Leon Trotsky Three Concepts of the Russian Revolution 1

    Leon Trotsky Three Concepts of the Russian Revolution 1 The Revolution of 1905 came to be not only the “general rehearsal” of 1917 but also the laboratory in which all the fundamental groupings of Russian political life were worked out and all the tendencies and shadings inside Russian Marxism were projected. At the core of the arguments and divergences was, needless to say, the question concerning the historical nature of the Russian Revolution and its future course of development. That conflict of concepts and prognoses has no direct bearing on the biography of Stalin, who did not participate in it in his own right. The few propagandist articles he wrote on that subject are utterly devoid of theoretical interest. Scores of Bolsheviks who plied the pen popularised the same thoughts, and did it considerably better. Any critical exposition of Bolshevism’s revolutionary concepts naturally belongs in a biography of Lenin. But theories have their own fate. Although during the period of the First Revolution [1905] and subsequently, as late as 1923, at the time when the revolutionary doctrines were elaborated and applied, Stalin had no independent position whatever, a sudden change occurred in 1924, which opened an epoch of bureaucratic reaction and radical transvaluation of the past. The film of the revolution was unwound in reverse order. Old doctrines were subjected either to a new evaluation or a new interpretation. Thus, rather unexpectedly at first glance, attention was focused on the concept of “permanent revolution” as the prime source of all the fallacies of “Trotskyism”. For many years to come criticism of that concept formed the main content of all the theoretical – sit venio verbo – writings of Stalin and his collaborators.
  • The Personal, the Political, and Permanent Revolution: Ernest Mandel and the Conflicted Legacies of Trotskyism*

    The Personal, the Political, and Permanent Revolution: Ernest Mandel and the Conflicted Legacies of Trotskyism*

    IRSH 55 (2010), pp. 117–132 doi:10.1017/S0020859009990642 r 2010 Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis REVIEW ESSAY The Personal, the Political, and Permanent Revolution: Ernest Mandel and the Conflicted Legacies of Trotskyism* B RYAN D. PALMER Canadian Studies, Trent University, Traill College E-mail: [email protected] JAN WILLEM STUTJE. Ernest Mandel: A Rebel’s Dream Deferred. Verso, London [etc.] 2009. 460 pp. $34.95. Biographies of revolutionary Marxists should not be written by the faint of heart. The difficulties are daunting. Which revolutionary tradition is to be given pride of place? Of many Marxisms, which will be extolled, which exposed? What balance will be struck between the personal and the political, a dilemma that cannot be avoided by those who rightly place analytic weight on the public life of organizations and causes and yet understand, as well, how private experience affects not only the individual but the movements, ideas, and developments he or she influenced. Social history’s accent on the particular and its elaboration of context, political biography’s attention to structures, institutions, and debates central to an individual’s life, and intellectual history’s close examination of central ideas and the complexities of their refinement present a trilogy of challenge for any historian who aspires to write the life of someone who was both in history and dedicated to making his- tory. Ernest Mandel was just such a someone, an exceedingly important and troublingly complex figure. * The author thanks Tom Reid, Murray Smith, and Paul Le Blanc for reading an earlier draft of this review, and offering suggestions for revision.
  • Socialism in One Country” Promoting National Identity Based on Class Identification

    Socialism in One Country” Promoting National Identity Based on Class Identification

    “Socialism in One Country” Promoting National Identity Based on Class Identification IVAN SZPAKOWSKI The Russian Empire of the Romanovs spanned thousands of miles from the Baltic to the Pacific, with a population of millions drawn from dozens of ethnic groups. Following the Russian Civil War, the Bolsheviks inherited the problem of holding together such a heterogeneous body. At the same time, they were forced to uphold Marxist ideology demanding worldwide revolution of the proletariat while facing the reality that despite the turmoil following the First World War no such revolution was forthcoming. In 1924 the rising Joseph Stalin, along with Nikolai Bukharin, devised the theory of “Socialism in One Country” which would become the solution to many of these problems facing the Bolsheviks. First of all, it proclaimed the ability of socialism to succeed in the Soviet Union alone, without foreign aid. Additionally, it marked a change from Lenin’s policy of self-determination for the Soviet Union’s constituent nations to Stalin’s policy of a compulsory unitary state. These non-Russian ethnics were systematically and firmly incorporated into the Soviet Union by the promotion of a proletariat class mentality. The development of the theory and policy of “Socialism in One Country” thus served to forge the unitary national identity of the Soviet Union around the concept of common Soviet class identity. The examination of this policy’s role in building a new form of national identity is dependant on a variety of sources, grouped into several subject areas. First, the origin of the term “Socialism in One Country,” its original meaning and its interpretation can be found in the speeches and writings of prominent contemporary communist leaders, chief among them: Stalin and Trotsky.
  • Terrorism and Communism

    Terrorism and Communism

    Routledge Revivals Terrorism and Communism First published in English in 1920, this is a reissue of Karl Kautsky's seminal work dealing with the origins and history of the forces at work in revolutionary epochs, which offers path breaking insights into the development of civilisation. The opening chapters, dealing with eighteenth century France, are of special interest to the student of the French revolution. The section devoted to the Commune of Paris offers a stimulating and provocative description of this famous government of the working class. The reissue of this controversial and extraordinary work will be welcomed by all those interested in the history of Communism in particular and the theory and history of revolution in general. Terrorism and Communism A Contribution to the Natural History of Revolution Karl Kautsky Translated by W. H. Kerridge First published in 1920 by George Allen & Unwin This edition first published in 2011 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 4RN Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Publisher’s Note The publisher has gone to great lengths to ensure the quality of this reprint but points out that some imperfections in the original copies may be apparent.
  • The Bolshevil{S and the Chinese Revolution 1919-1927 Chinese Worlds

    The Bolshevil{S and the Chinese Revolution 1919-1927 Chinese Worlds

    The Bolshevil{s and the Chinese Revolution 1919-1927 Chinese Worlds Chinese Worlds publishes high-quality scholarship, research monographs, and source collections on Chinese history and society from 1900 into the next century. "Worlds" signals the ethnic, cultural, and political multiformity and regional diversity of China, the cycles of unity and division through which China's modern history has passed, and recent research trends toward regional studies and local issues. It also signals that Chineseness is not contained within territorial borders ­ overseas Chinese communities in all countries and regions are also "Chinese worlds". The editors see them as part of a political, economic, social, and cultural continuum that spans the Chinese mainland, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macau, South­ East Asia, and the world. The focus of Chinese Worlds is on modern politics and society and history. It includes both history in its broader sweep and specialist monographs on Chinese politics, anthropology, political economy, sociology, education, and the social­ science aspects of culture and religions. The Literary Field of New Fourth Artny Twentieth-Century China Communist Resistance along the Edited by Michel Hockx Yangtze and the Huai, 1938-1941 Gregor Benton Chinese Business in Malaysia Accumulation, Ascendance, A Road is Made Accommodation Communism in Shanghai 1920-1927 Edmund Terence Gomez Steve Smith Internal and International Migration The Bolsheviks and the Chinese Chinese Perspectives Revolution 1919-1927 Edited by Frank N Pieke and Hein Mallee
  • Battle for Workers Rights in Australia by Aggie Mccallum

    Battle for Workers Rights in Australia by Aggie Mccallum

    Socialist Fight Issue No. 5 Winter 2010-11 Price: Concessions: 50p, Waged: £2.00 Only a United Anti-cuts Campaign based on strikes and occupations will defeat the Coalition assault Contents Page 2: Editorial: Only a United Anti-cuts Campaign based on strikes and occupations will defeat the Coalition assault. Page 5: Three days in the life of an Unemployed Workers Centre. Page 6: Ireland on the Rack: Defend the welfare state, de- fend the Republican Prisoners By AJ Byrne. Page 7: After the Irish bailout: The financial wolf pack tar- gets new victims By Nick Beams. Page 8: Ireland: The Creepy Millionaires’ Budget By Michael Taft. Page 9: Jimmy Reid: “It cannae be Lenin — he’s deid” Obitu- ary By Tony Fox. Page 12: The Jerry Hicks Campaign: Good Trot, Bad Trot and Trot in the Middle By Gerry Downing. Page 14: Obama’s America: The Furlough—Intent and Im- pact By Jake Cooper. Page 16: Mumia Abu-Jamal, on Pennsylvania's death row for 29 years By Dave Lindorfff. Page 18: Class Struggle in Zimbabwe by Ady, RIL - FI (Zimbabwe). Page 20: Trotskyist Turn in Nepal? By Rajesh Tyagi (New Wave). Page 20: Comment on the above By Ret Marut. Page 21: Women's Oppression: Two opposing views of the sex industry. Page 24: Letters pages. Page 28: Dubstep rebellion - the British banlieue comes to Millbank By Paul Mason Page 29: The Recession and Theories of Imperialism: It has to be Lenin! By Ret Marut. Page 31: Debating the Thermidor: “Me No Dirty Commie” By Gerry Downing. Page 33: Ark Tribe….Battle for Workers Rights in Australia By Aggie McCallum.
  • Salgado Munoz, Manuel (2019) Origins of Permanent Revolution Theory: the Formation of Marxism As a Tradition (1865-1895) and 'The First Trotsky'

    Salgado Munoz, Manuel (2019) Origins of Permanent Revolution Theory: the Formation of Marxism As a Tradition (1865-1895) and 'The First Trotsky'

    Salgado Munoz, Manuel (2019) Origins of permanent revolution theory: the formation of Marxism as a tradition (1865-1895) and 'the first Trotsky'. Introductory dimensions. MRes thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/74328/ Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Origins of permanent revolution theory: the formation of Marxism as a tradition (1865-1895) and 'the first Trotsky'. Introductory dimensions Full name of Author: Manuel Salgado Munoz Any qualifications: Sociologist Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements of the Degree of Master of Research School of Social & Political Sciences, Sociology Supervisor: Neil Davidson University of Glasgow March-April 2019 Abstract Investigating the period of emergence of Marxism as a tradition between 1865 and 1895, this work examines some key questions elucidating Trotsky's theoretical developments during the first decade of the XXth century. Emphasizing the role of such authors like Plekhanov, Johann Baptists von Schweitzer, Lenin and Zetkin in the developing of a 'Classical Marxism' that served as the foundation of the first formulation of Trotsky's theory of permanent revolution, it treats three introductory dimensions of this larger problematic: primitive communism and its feminist implications, the debate on the relations between the productive forces and the relations of production, and the first apprehensions of Marx's economic mature works.
  • The British Radical Literary Tradition As the Seminal Force in the Development of Adult Education, Its Australian Context, and the Life and Work of Eric Lambert

    The British Radical Literary Tradition As the Seminal Force in the Development of Adult Education, Its Australian Context, and the Life and Work of Eric Lambert

    Writing Revolution: The British Radical Literary Tradition as the Seminal Force in the Development of Adult Education, its Australian Context, and the Life and Work of Eric Lambert Author Merlyn, Teri Published 2004 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School School of Vocational, Technology and Arts Education DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/3245 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/367384 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Writing Revolution: The British Radical Literary tradition as the Seminal Force in the Development of Adult Education, its Australian Context, and the Life and Work of Eric Lambert By Teri Merlyn BA, Grad.Dip.Cont.Ed. Volume One School of Vocational, Technology and Arts Education Griffith University Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Date:……………………………………………………………………… Abstract This thesis tells the story of an historical tradition of radical literacy and literature that is defined as the British radical literary tradition. It takes the meaning of literature at its broadest understanding and identifies the literary and educational relations of what E P Thompson terms ‘the making of the English working class’ through its struggle for literacy and freedom. The study traces the developing dialectic of literary radicalism and the emergent hegemony of capitalism through the dissemination of radical ideas in literature and a groundswell of public literacy. The proposed radical tradition is defined by the oppositional stance of its participants, from the radical intellectual’s critical texts to the striving for literacy and access to literature by working class people.
  • Chronology of Stalin's Life

    Chronology of Stalin's Life

    Chronology of Stalin's Life ('Old Style' to February 1918) 1879 9 Dec Born in Gori. 1888 Sept Enters clerical elementary school in Gori. 1894 Sept Enters theological seminary in Tbilisi. 1899 May Expelled from seminary. 1900 Apr Addresses worker demonstration near Tbilisi. 1902 Apr Arrested in Batumi following worker demonstration of which he was an organizer. 1903 July-Aug Appearance of Lenin's Bolshevik faction at the Second Congress of the Russian Social-Democratic Workers' Party (Stalin not present). 1904 Jan Escapes from place of exile in Siberia and returns to underground revolutionary work in Transcaucasia. 1905 Revolution, reaching peak in Oct-Dec. threatens the survival of the tsarist government. Stalin marries Ekaterina Svanidze. Dec Attends Bolshevik conference. also attended by Lenin, in Tammerfors, Finland. 1906 Apr Attends 'Unity' congress of party in Stockholm. 1907 Mar Birth of first child, Yakov. Apr Publishes first substantial piece of writing, 'Anarchism or Socialism?' Apr-May Attends party congress in London. Jun Moves operations to Baku. Oct Death of his wife, Ekaterina. 1908 Mar Arrested in Baku. 317 318 Chronology of Stalin's Life 1909 June Escapes from place of exile, Solvychegodsk, returns to underground in Baku. 1910 Mar Arrested and jailed. Oct Returned to exile in Solvychegodsk. 1911 June Police permit his legal residence in Vologda. Sept Illegally goes to St Petersburg but is arrested and returned to Vologda. 1912 Jan Bolshevik conference in Prague at which Lenin attempts to establish his control of party; Stalin not present but soon after is co-opted to new Central Committee. Apr Illegally moves to St Petersburg, but is arrested there.
  • Marxism, Prefigurative Communism, and the Problem of Workers' Control

    Marxism, Prefigurative Communism, and the Problem of Workers' Control

    The Anarchist Library Anti-Copyright Marxism, Prefigurative Communism, and the Problem of Workers’ Control Carl Boggs Carl Boggs Marxism, Prefigurative Communism, and the Problem of Workers’ Control 1977 Boggs, Carl. 1977. “Marxism, Prefigurative Communism, and the Problem of Workers’ Control”. Radical America 11 (November), 100; cf. Boggs Jr., Carl. Revolutionary Process, Political Strategy, and the Dilemma of Power. Theory & Society 4,No. 3 (Fall), 3. Republished in Class Against Class www.oocities.org. Republished again in libcom.org. theanarchistlibrary.org 1977 hegemonic, with the party-state directing the process of revolution- ary transformation from above. An alternative schema would reverse this relationship by assert- ing the prefigurative over the Jacobin. For the party is essentially an instrumental agency preoccupied with concrete political tasks rather than the cultural objectives of changing everyday life and abolishing the capitalist division of labor; it tends naturally to be an agency of domination rather than of prefiguration. Since emancipa- tory goals can be fully carried out only through locs1 structures, it is these organs — rather than the party-state — that must shape the revolutionary process. Centralised structures would not be super- imposed upon mass struggles, but would emerge out of these strug- gles as coordinating mechanisms. Only popular institutions in ev- ery sphere of daily existence, where democratic impulses can be most completely realized, can fight off the repressive incursions of bureaucratic centralism and activate collective involvement that is the life-force of revolutionary practice. 39 between economics and politics is estab1ished in each case: the corparativist councils have restricted decision-making within Specific enterprises but have little or no impact on societal-wide public policy.