Coastal Adaptation and Protection Grants Past Grants Awarded Coastal Adaptation and Protection Grants (2020/2021) Total: $1,056,540

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Coastal Adaptation and Protection Grants Past Grants Awarded Coastal Adaptation and Protection Grants (2020/2021) Total: $1,056,540 Coastal Adaptation and Protection Grants Past grants awarded Coastal Adaptation and Protection Grants (2020/2021) Total: $1,056,540 Recipient Project Description Grant City of Cockburn Cockburn Sound coastal Hydrographic survey and beach $48,500 survey scanning from Bathers Beach to Cape Peron City of Fremantle Port Beach coastal adaptation Sand nourishment investigation $13,385.50 detailed design and report detailed design and final report update City of Fremantle & Port, Leighton and Mosman Collection of site and remote time $18,750 Town of Mosman beaches coastal monitoring lapse photos, beach surveys, Park program – 2020/2021 data sediment samples and storm collection monitoring City of Joondalup Coastal monitoring program Collection of site photos, time lapse $18,518.50 2020-2021 photos, shoreline movement and beach profile surveys of City’s coastline City of Joondalup Sand bypassing program Sand bypassing from Sorrento $75,000 2020-21 Beach to Hillarys Beach City of Rockingham Coastal survey – Cape Peron Hydrographic survey and beach $37,437.50 to Singleton scanning from Cape Peron to Singleton City of Wanneroo Aerial survey of beaches and Aerial laser scan survey of the $21,711 coastal structures City’s coastline and coastal structures City of Wanneroo Beach renourishment sand Investigate future sand $20,000 sourcing feasibility study nourishment sources, understand the associated potential environmental impacts and approval requirements City of Wanneroo Quinns Beach and Yanchep Sand nourishment $150,000 Lagoon sand re-nourishment Peron Naturaliste Regional coastal monitoring Review of PNP coastal data and $30,000 Partnership (PNP) program – review and analysis methodology Page 1 of 19 Shire of Broome Shoreline monitoring of Beach surveys and collection of $12,500 and Nyamba Buru Broome townsite site photos Yawuru Shire of Esperance Esperance Bay coordinated Sand nourishment trial utilising $300,000 dredging and sand back pumped dredged material passing trial Shire of Gingin Condition assessment of Coastal structure inspection, $13,450 Ledge Point and Guilderton maintenance options and cost Groynes estimate Shire of Gingin Gingin coastal erosion Obtain oblique aerial imagery, $19,835 hotspots monitoring project vertical aerial imagery and complete photogrammetry analysis Shire of Murray Coastal Hazard Risk Coastal hazard assessment for $50,000 Management and Adaptation Peel Harvey Estuary Planning Town of Port Protecting Hedland – coastal Detail design and construction of $227,452.50 Hedland seawalls project – West End seawall at West End Page 2 of 19 Coastal Adaptation and Protection Grants (2019/2020) Total: $1,056,540 Recipient Project Description Grant City of Albany Emu Point to Middleton Beach Beach monitoring and coastal $53,480 coastal adaptation and protection zone data collection strategy City of Busselton Beach monitoring (Year 7) Collection of beach profile $51,000 surveys, aerial and site photos, and detailed aerial survey from Geographe Bay to Cape Naturaliste City of Fremantle Port Beach coastal adaptation Detail design of preferred $50,000 option design coastal adaptation option with community and stakeholder’s consultation City of Fremantle & Port, Leighton and Mosman Collection of site and remote $12,500 Town of Mosman beaches coastal monitoring time lapse photos, beach Park program (Year 2) surveys, sediment samples and storm monitoring City of Greater Wave and current data collection Wave and current measurement $31,270 Geraldton at Sunset Beach off Sunset Beach for six months by two instruments City of Joondalup Coastal monitoring program Collection of site photos, remote $24,450 2019-2020 time lapse photos, shoreline movement and beach profile surveys City of Joondalup Sand bypassing 2019-2020 Sand bypassing from Sorrento $75,000 Beach to Hillarys Beach City of Rockingham Coastal monitoring Coastal data collection including $32,500 beach surveys City of Rockingham Point Peron spur groyne Review of data associated with $37,500 modification and upgrades Point Peron spur groyne and prepare concept and detail design for the groyne upgrade City of Wanneroo Provision of aerial survey services Aerial LiDAR survey of the City’s $21,600 for beaches and coastal coastline and coastal structures structures City of Wanneroo Quinns Beach long term coastal Extension of Quinns Beach $300,000 management stage 2 – extension groyne 3 by 15m, beach of Groyne 3 and beach renourishment works, dune renourishment rehabilitation and clean up City of Wanneroo Quinns Beach and Yanchep Sand nourishment at Quinns $88,785 Lagoon renourishment Beach and Yanchep Lagoon Page 3 of 19 Peron Naturaliste ‘CoastSnap’ community Implementation of first $35,150 Partnership (PNP) monitoring and analysis ‘CoastSnap’ project in WA at nine locations between Rockingham and Busselton Shire of Broome Town Beach geotechnical and Geotechnical investigation $30,000 erodibility study followed by development of coastal adaptation options Shire of Broome Shoreline monitoring of Broome Shoreline monitoring of Broome $12,000 and Nyamba Buru townsite townsite Yawuru (NBY) Shire of Esperance Esperance Bay sand Annual sand nourishment along $150,000 renourishment Norseman Road Shire of Gingin Shire of Gingin coastal inundation Coastal inundation investigation $29,305 study and impact assessment on Shire of Gingin’s coastal townsites Shire of Shark Bay Denham coastal monitoring Photo monitoring, beach survey $11,000 and documentation of active coastal management activities. Town of Cottesloe Coastal monitoring to improve Continuation of coastal data $11,000 understanding of long-term collection including beach coastal change (Year 6) surveys, remote photo monitoring and data analysis Page 4 of 19 Coastal Adaptation and Protection Grants (2018/2019) Total: $1,056,540 Recipient Project Description Grant City of Albany Emu Point to Middleton Beach Beach monitoring and coastal zone $60,163 coastal adaptation and data collection protection strategy City of Busselton Beach monitoring (year 6) Collection of beach profile surveys, $26,000 aerial photos and site photos at Geographe Bay City of Busselton Sand nourishment (year 6) Sand nourishment along Geographe $55,000 Bay City of Busselton Maintenance of Craig Street Maintenance of Craig Street coastal $125,000 groyne and seawall protection structure City of Busselton Broadwater Beach Coastal Relocation of vulnerable public $75,000 Adaptation assets and shoreline stabilisation investigation City of Cockburn North Coogee (Rollinson Rd) Sand nourishment north of $47,500 beach nourishment Catherine Point groyne City of Fremantle Port Beach asset condition Investigation and assessment of $40,000 assessment, analysis and coastal protection structures, development of maintenance/management program, management/maintenance adaptation options program. City of Fremantle Port, Leighton and Mosman Coastal and photo monitoring. Data $25,000 & Town of beaches coastal monitoring register to collate and acquire long- Mosman Park program establishment and term information Year 1 data collection City of Greater Whitehill Road sand Sand nourishment at Whitehill Road $52,658 Geraldton nourishment Foreshore City of Joondalup Sand Bypassing 2018-19 Sand bypassing from Sorrento $75,000 Beach to Hillarys Beach City of Joondalup Coastal monitoring program Collection of site photos, time lapse $14,600 2018-19 photos, shoreline movement and beach profile surveys at City coastal line City of Mandurah Mandurah AWACs and wave Documentation and analysis of $20,000 buoy data collection review and oceanographic datasets collected analysis 2013-2018 from 2013 to 2018 City of Stirling Adaptation plan and defensive Investigation of adaptation options $60,000 works at Mettams Pool, Trigg for public infrastructures City of Wanneroo Quinns Beach renourishment Sand nourishment at Quinns Beach $125,000 Page 5 of 19 Shire of Coastline dynamics, coastal Shoreline and coastal geophysical $40,000 Ashburton infrastructure impacts, and surveys, sediment collection and erosion hotspots along the shoreline movement analysis Ashburton coast Shire of Broome Shoreline monitoring of Broome Shoreline monitoring of Broome $14,750 and Nyamba townsite townsite Buru Yawuru (NBY) Shire of Broome Geotechnical investigation and Geotechnical investigation to $40,000 adaptation design improve understanding of the presence of rock formations under the main dune system Shire of Denmark Ocean Beach and Peaceful Bay Coastal monitoring and $25,000 coastal monitoring and geotechnical survey investigation Shire of Esperance Bay sand Sand nourishment along Norseman $110,000 Esperance renourishment Road Shire of Preparation of a coastal hazard Coastal hazard assessment at $10,020 Northampton assessment Horrocks Town of Coastal monitoring to improve Continuation of the collection of $15,849 Cottesloe understanding of long-term beach surveys, remote photo coastal change (Year 5) and monitoring and data analysis post storm monitoring Page 6 of 19 Coastal Adaptation and Protection Grants (2017/2018) Total: $756,540 Recipient Project Description Grant City of Albany Emu Point to Middleton Beach Beach monitoring, coastal zone $65,128 Coastal Adaptation and Protection data collection and coastal Strategy protection structures maintenance City of Busselton Beach Monitoring (Year 5) Collection of beach profile $26,000 surveys, aerial photos and site photos at Geographe Bay City of Joondalup Coastal Monitoring Program Collection of beach profile $18,700 2017-18 surveys, remote and site
Recommended publications
  • Gascoyne FAST FACTS 2017
    Gascoyne FAST FACTS 2017 Population As illustrated in figure 1, since 2001 the Gascoyne has exhibited significant depopulation, experiencing a net 4.3% decrease. Although there has been notable population growth between the With a population of approximately 10,000 people in 2015, the years 2007 and 2014 (6.1%), the Gascoyne has experienced a Gascoyne has the lowest estimated resident population of all the recent 0.2% population decrease between 2014 and 2015. regions in Western Australia. 10600 7000 10400 6000 10200 5000 10000 9800 4000 9600 3000 2005 9400 9200 2000 2015 9000 Population 1000 8800 Population 0 Carnarvon Exmouth Shark Bay Upper Gascoyne Year Local Government Area Figure 2: Estimated Resident Population for the Gascoyne’s Local Government Figure 1: Estimated Gascoyne Resident Population 2001 – 2015 (source: Australian Areas (source: ABS). Bureau of Statistics (ABS)). Gascoyne Fast Facts 2017 1 Age Structure The Shire of Carnarvon is the most populated of the Gascoyne’s 4 local government areas with a population of just over 6,000 in 2015. 10.00 9.00 As displayed in figure 2, the population in the Shire of Carnarvon has 8.00 remained fairly static between 2005 and 2015. 7.00 6.00 5.00 The greatest local population increase from 2005 to 2015 was 4.00 in the Shire of Exmouth (15.9%). 3.00 The local government area experiencing the greatest 2.00 Population (%) Population 1.00 population decrease from 2005 to 2015 was the Shire of 0.00 Upper Gascoyne (-20.5%). Shark Bay has experienced recent (2014 – 2015) population growth (1.4%), greater than the growth for Western Australia Age Cohort (1.3%) for the same time period.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of Western Australia Department of Environment Regulation
    Government of Western Australia Department of Environment Regulation NOTIFICATION OF APPLICATIONS RECEIVED FOR CLEARING PERMITS AND AMENDMENTS AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC SUBMISSIONS AND/OR REGISTRATIONS OF INTEREST Applications for clearing permits with a 7 day submission period 1. Shire of Quairading, Area Permit, Lot 29205 on Deposited Plan 219610 (Reserve 30628), Quairading, Shire of Quairading, walkway, 0.04ha, (CPS 6838/1) Applications for clearing permits with a 21 day submission period 1. EF Rzemek, Area Permit, Lot 3444 on Deposited Plan 205127, Muckenburra, Shire of Gingin, horticulture, 12ha, (CPS 6815/1) 2. R & R Jordan Pty Ltd ATR R & R Jordan Superannuation Fund, Area Permit, Lot 51 on Plan 10545, Barragup, Shire of Murray, grazing and pasture, 1ha, (CPS 6817) 3. GA and AV Haythornthwaite, Area Permit, Lot 401 on Deposited Plan 137888, Merivale, Shire of Esperance, pasture, 77.038ha, (CPS 6826/1) 4. Shire of Manjimup, Area Permit, Hospital Avenue road reserve (PIN 11422036) and Lot 350 on Deposited Plan 407139, Pemberton, Shire of Manjimup, road construction and fire hazard reduction, 0.149ha, (CPS 6830/1) 5. Kerygma Pty. Ltd, Area Permit, Lot 2656 on Deposited Plan 153480, Yallingup, City of Busselton, existing dam expansion, 0.325ha, (CPS 6839/1) Submissions for applications for clearing permits are to be made within the time frame specified. Submissions may be forwarded to Clearing Regulation, Locked Bag 33, Cloisters Square WA 6850, or email to [email protected]. Further information is available through the website ftp.dec.wa.gov.au/Permit or telephone (08) 9333 7469. NOTIFICATION OF DECISIONS AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC APPEAL Clearing permits granted 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Perth Freight Link: Facts and Fiction Prepared by Peter Newman and Philip Jennings for the Beeliar Group – Professors for Environmental Responsibility
    For Release 8 Feb 2017 The Perth Freight Link: Facts and Fiction Prepared by Peter Newman and Philip Jennings for The Beeliar Group – Professors for Environmental Responsibility The supporters of Roe 8 and the Perth Freight Link (PFL) have been spreading misinformation and half truths about the developments. Their aim is to discredit alternatives by the selective use of the facts. This analysis of the Roe 8 and PFL myths provides a more complete picture. Myth 1: The PFL has been on the books for 60 years and no one objected until recently. The PFL was a Prime Minister Abbott “Captain’s Call” presented to the former Transport Minister, Dean Nalder, at a meeting in Canberra in early 2015, along with similar highly controversial roads in Melbourne and Sydney. The Melbourne East-West Link was rejected by the Victorian people at their last election. It is extremely unusual to have a road project proposed by a Commonwealth politician and it has disrupted all planning processes since it was dropped on Perth without any history or warning. The PFL is still a vague proposal and the detailed design has never been released publicly or assessed by the EPA. Roe 8 was included in the Metropolitan Region Scheme in 1963 without any public consultation or environmental impact assessment as part of a ring road bringing traffic to the coast between North Coogee and South Beach and then north to Fremantle. The Cockburn Wetlands Study of 1975 first suggested that the road should not proceed. The first environmental assessment was carried out by the EPA in 1978 and it recommended in its System Six report in 1980 that a new route be found because the proposed route was environmentally unacceptable.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Land and Groundwater for Horticulture from Gingin to Augusta
    Research Library Resource management technical reports Natural resources research 1-1-1999 Coastal land and groundwater for horticulture from Gingin to Augusta Dennis Van Gool Werner Runge Follow this and additional works at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/rmtr Part of the Agriculture Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Soil Science Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Van Gool, D, and Runge, W. (1999), Coastal land and groundwater for horticulture from Gingin to Augusta. Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia, Perth. Report 188. This report is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural resources research at Research Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Resource management technical reports by an authorized administrator of Research Library. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. ISSN 0729-3135 May 1999 Coastal Land and Groundwater for Horticulture from Gingin to Augusta Dennis van Gool and Werner Runge Resource Management Technical Report No. 188 LAND AND GROUNDWATER FOR HORTICULTURE Information for Readers and Contributors Scientists who wish to publish the results of their investigations have access to a large number of journals. However, for a variety of reasons the editors of most of these journals are unwilling to accept articles that are lengthy or contain information that is preliminary in nature. Nevertheless, much material of this type is of interest and value to other scientists, administrators or planners and should be published. The Resource Management Technical Report series is an avenue for the dissemination of preliminary or lengthy material relevant the management of natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Number of Total Fire Ban Declarations Per Fire Season
    NUMBER OF TOTAL FIRE BAN DECLARATIONS PER FIRE SEASON LOCAL GOVERNMENT 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Christmas Island 2 1 0 0 1 0 City of Albany 2 1 2 3 10 1 City of Armadale 11 4 0 5 17 18 City of Bayswater 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Belmont 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Bunbury 7 1 0 2 5 7 City of Busselton 6 1 0 2 5 7 City of Canning 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Cockburn 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Fremantle 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Gosnells 11 4 0 5 17 18 City of Greater Geraldton 4 6 3 14 19 20 City of Joondalup 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Kalamunda 11 4 0 5 18 18 City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder 2 8 10 14 20 9 City of Karratha 1 1 2 7 10 2 City of Kwinana 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Mandurah 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Melville 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Nedlands 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Perth 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Rockingham 11 1 0 1 7 6 City of South Perth 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Stirling 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Subiaco 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Swan 11 4 0 5 18 22 City of Vincent 9 1 0 1 7 6 City of Wanneroo 10 1 0 1 8 10 Cocos (Keeling) Islands 2 1 0 0 1 0 Indian Ocean Territories 2 1 0 0 1 0 Shire of Ashburton 1 2 4 11 11 3 Shire of Augusta Margaret River 7 1 0 0 6 3 Shire of Beverley 3 2 1 2 15 14 Shire of Boddington 6 3 1 0 7 11 Shire of Boyup Brook 6 3 0 1 6 7 Shire of Bridgetown- 6 3 0 1 6 7 Greenbushes Shire of Brookton 4 3 1 0 8 15 Shire of Broome 1 0 2 0 9 0 DFES – TOTAL FIRE BANS DECLARED PER YEAR PER LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA Page 1 of 4 NUMBER OF TOTAL FIRE BAN DECLARATIONS PER FIRE SEASON LOCAL GOVERNMENT 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Shire of Broomehill-Tambellup
    [Show full text]
  • ECM 5553401 V1 North Coogee Foreshore Management Plan
    NORTH COOGEE FORESHORE MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by: Ecoscape (Australia) Pty Ltd Document Status Reviewer Approved for Issue Rev. No. Author Name Signature Name Signature Date 1 DK,MW, SB DK 2 DK,MW, SB MW 3 DK,MW, SB AW MW 4 MW DK DK 27/3/07 5 MW DK DK 4/5/07 6 MW 4/5/07 FINAL DRAFT MW DK FINAL MW DK DK 20/11/07 FINAL rev 1 PJ MW MW 19/06/08 FINAL rev 2 PJ MW MW 27/06/08 FINAL rev 3 PJ MW MW 26/03/09 5638-1338-07R March, 2009 Document Set ID: 5553401 Version: 1, Version Date: 03/02/2017 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT FOR: North Coogee Foreshore Management Plan Copyright © 1987-2009 Ecoscape (Australia) Pty Ltd ABN 70 070 128 675 Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), the whole or any part of this report may not be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owner, Ecoscape (Australia) Pty Ltd. This includes microcopying, photocopying or recording of any parts of the report. Neither may the information contained in this report be reproduced, transmitted or stored electronically in any form, such as in a retrieval system, without the specific written permission of Ecoscape (Australia) Pty Ltd. Limitations Statement This report has been exclusively drafted for the needs of STOCKLAND & LANDCORP in conjunction with the CITY OF COCKBURN. No express or implied warranties are made by Ecoscape (Australia) Pty Ltd regarding the research findings and data contained in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • South West Country Zone Minutes 24 April 2020
    South West Country Zone Minutes 24 April 2020 Minutes South West Country Zone – 24 April 2020 Page 1 Table of Contents 1. OPENING AND WELCOME ..................................................................................... 3 2. ATTENDANCE AND APOLOGIES ........................................................................... 3 3. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST ............................................................................. 4 4. ANNOUNCEMENTS ................................................................................................. 4 5. GUEST SPEAKERS / DEPUTATIONS ..................................................................... 5 5.1 Bunbury Geographe Economic Alliance ...................................................................... 5 6. MINUTES .................................................................................................................. 5 6.1 Confirmation of Minutes from the South West Country Zone meeting held Friday 28 February 2020 (Attachment 1) .................................................................................... 5 6.2 Business Arising from the Minutes of the South West Country Zone Meeting Friday 28 February 2020 ............................................................................................................ 5 7. ZONE BUSINESS ..................................................................................................... 6 7.1 Payments to Volunteers Impacted by Emergency Events ........................................... 6 7.2 South West Electoral
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Local Government Policy Awards Showcase
    10th Anniversary THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT POLICY AWARDS Children • Environment • Health 2020 Showcase Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries Images courtesy of PHAIWA. This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from PHAIWA. To obtain further copies of this publication you can contact the following: PHAIWA GPO Box U1987 Perth WA 6845 Phone: (08) 9266 2489 Email: [email protected] Web: www.phaiwa.org.au Note the document may be accessed electronically from www.phaiwa.org.au © October 2020 Public Health Advocacy Institute of WA It can be cited as Public Health Advocacy Institute of Western Australia (2020). 10th Anniversary - The Local Government Policy Awards Children Environment Health 2020 Showcase. Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia. Acknowledgements PHAIWA would like to thank The Minister for Local Government; Heritage; Culture and the Arts, Healthway, the WA Local Government Association, the Commissioner for Children and Young People WA and Cancer Council WA for their support and financial contributions towards the development and implementation of the Local Government Policy Awards. PHAIWA would like to make a special acknowledgment to Healthway for their 10 years of continued support of the project. Thank you to the Local Government’s City of Mandurah, Shire of Harvey, City of Kalamunda and Shire of Kondinin who have provided the cover images. Finally, PHAIWA would like to sincerely
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Research
    RESIDENTIAL RESEARCH Greater Perth higher density residential development site sales tallied $213.36 million in the year ending 31 August 2015. Despite a slowdown in residential $20.50 million; both projects being development sites sales across Greater marketed in 2015. Other recent major site In the past year, by value, 64.6% Perth, the construction phase is active sales, with potential for higher density in of Greater Perth development with many projects kicking-off earlier Greater Perth, have been listed in Table 1 sites were sold to foreign than scheduled due to the majority of on page 4. investors. apartments selling off-the-plan in the Inner and Middle Suburbs regions. Over the two years to the end of August 2015, the Inner Suburbs region recorded Foreign investors have a the highest volume of residential proposed $1.32 billion Sales Volume worth of development site sales at $275.79 million, residential developments in the whilst the Perth CBD saw $32.90 million pipeline in WA. Sales turnover of major sites, likely for higher density development in Greater in sales. The Middle Suburbs region, Perth, grew substantially over the three resulted in sales in the order of $147.11 Lone person households are years to 31 August 2014 to stand at million over the same time. projected to have the highest $322.23 million, as shown in Figure 1. growth at 3.0% per annum over However, the twelve months to the end There are significant infrastructure the next twenty years of August 2015, recorded $213.36 million projects currently under construction that worth of transacted sales, reflecting the will greatly benefit not only these regions, weaker buyer sentiment in the wider but the Greater Perth area, including Strong pipeline of committed Perth property market.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission of Form BA20 Notice of Consent to the Department of Housing
    Submission of Form BA20 Notice of Consent to the Department of Housing The following contact details should be used in relation to obtaining written consent from the Department of Housing as the adjoining property owner along a shared property boundary. 1. Where the Department of Housing property is occupied or construction has been completed the attached list of suburbs should be used to identify the Regional Office responsible for that suburb. The Notice of Consent Form BA20 and relevant documentation should be submitted to the Regional Manager using the details provided for that particular office. 2. Where construction has not yet commenced on the Department of Housing property or where construction is still in progress then the Notice of Consent Form BA20 and relevant documentation should be submitted to the Manager Professional Services using the details provided. NOTE – Approval will be delayed if the Notice of Consent Form BA20 and relevant documentation is not submitted to the correct processing area.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Australia
    WESTERN AUSTRALIA LAW AND JUSTICE FOUNDATION COLLABORATIVE PLANNING RESOURCE – JURISDICTIONAL DATA 2015 The Law and Justice Foundation of New South Wales (LJF) Collaborative Planning Resource (CPR) is intended to support the planning of legal assistance services by Australian jurisdictions. In 2015 this resource will be delivered in two parts: The LJF Collaborative Planning Resource – Service Planning (CPR-SP) summarises the research evidence on legal need and access to justice and the implications for planning legal service delivery. The geographical location of legal services, while important, is only one key aspect of planning and delivering effective legal assistance services to those most in need. Recognising the variation between different priority groups and the overlap between them, services can be targeted at identified client groups; timely to client’s experience; appropriate to varying legal need and capability; and joined-up as part of a holistic response. i Service design is likely to vary accordingly. For instance, reaching hard to find groups through other (often non-legal) services with which they have regular contact. The CPR-SP also provides useful information for designing appropriate legal services for specific priority demographic groups: ‘who’ priority clients are, ‘what’ types of services are appropriate to their legal needs and capabilities, and ‘how’ these services might be delivered. The LJF Collaborative Planning Resource – Jurisdictional Data (CPR-JD) brings together three sets of information relevant to making decisions about legal assistance provision: • The geographic distribution of the Commonwealth’s priority groups for services • The prevalence of experiencing legal problems for each priority group • The geographic distribution of those most likely to be in need of legal assistance services for financial or other reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E: Case Studies E Adoption Guidelines for Stormwater Biofiltration Systems Appendix E – Case Studies | 2
    Adoption Guidelines for Stormwater Biofiltration Systems Appendix E: Case studies E Adoption Guidelines for Stormwater Biofiltration Systems Appendix E – Case studies | 2 Monash University stormwater harvesting system This project was undertaken by FAWB and Monash University’s Water Conservation Committee to capture and treat stormwater runoff from a multi-level carpark (4500 2m ) on the Clayton campus of Monash University. The treated water is then used to irrigate an adjacent sports ground and there is an existing ornamental pond to store the treated water. The system is small relative to its catchment area and as a result overflow occurs frequently. This is not particularly problematic for harvesting (because the water is always pre-treated in two sedimentation tanks, where heavy metal concentrations are reduced, and high nutrient levels are not detrimental for this irrigation application) and, since overflows discharge to the storage pond, load reductions will still be achieved, provided overflow from the pond to the conventional stormwater drainage system is minimised. This can be achieved by keeping the pond slightly drawn down. The system has the following elements: • Surface area 45 m2, ponding depth 25 cm and filter depth of 70 cm. • 50 cm loamy sand above a 10 cm transition and 10 cm drainage layer Fully lined to prevent exfiltration • Densely planted with indigenous plants to a.) maximise the volume of treated water (plants help to maintain infiltration capacity) and b.) maximise pollutant removal. The system is currently being renewed with new media compositions, different plant species selection and layout. ©2015 – CRC for Water Sensitive Cities www.watersensitivecities.org.au | [email protected] Adoption Guidelines for Stormwater Biofiltration Systems Appendix E – Case studies | 3 Little Stringybark Creek biofiltration project This project was undertaken as part of a large-scale catchment retrofit project to restore the Little Stringybark Creek by reducing the impacts from stormwater runoff.
    [Show full text]