DOCSLIB.ORG

DNVGL-RU-HSLC-Pt5ch8 Naval Landing Craft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DNVGL-RU-HSLC-Pt5ch8 Naval Landing Craft RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION High speed and light craft Edition December 2015 Part 5 Ship types Chapter 8 Naval landing craft The content of this service document is the subject of intellectual property rights reserved by DNV GL AS ("DNV GL"). The user accepts that it is prohibited by anyone else but DNV GL and/or its licensees to offer and/or perform classification, certification and/or verification services, including the issuance of certificates and/or declarations of conformity, wholly or partly, on the basis of and/or pursuant to this document whether free of charge or chargeable, without DNV GL's prior written consent. DNV GL is not responsible for the consequences arising from any use of this document by others. The electronic pdf version of this document, available free of charge from http://www.dnvgl.com, is the officially binding version. DNV GL AS FOREWORD DNV GL rules for classification contain procedural and technical requirements related to obtaining and retaining a class certificate. The rules represent all requirements adopted by the Society as basis for classification. © DNV GL AS December 2015 Any comments may be sent by e-mail to [email protected] If any person suffers loss or damage which is proved to have been caused by any negligent act or omission of DNV GL, then DNV GL shall pay compensation to such person for his proved direct loss or damage. However, the compensation shall not exceed an amount equal to ten times the fee charged for the service in question, provided that the maximum compensation shall never exceed USD 2 million. In this provision "DNV GL" shall mean DNV GL AS, its direct and indirect owners as well as all its affiliates, subsidiaries, directors, officers, employees, agents and any other acting on behalf of DNV GL. CURRENT – CHANGES t n e r This is a new document. r u The rules enter into force 1 July 2016. c - s e g n a h C 8 r e t p a h C 5 t r a P Rules for classification: High speed and light craft — DNVGL-RU-HSLC-Pt5Ch8. Edition December 2015 Page 3 Naval landing craft DNV GL AS s t CONTENTS n e t n Current – changes...................................................................................................... 3 o C Section 1 General regulations.................................................................................... 7 8 1 Classification...........................................................................................7 r 1.1 Application.......................................................................................... 7 e t 1.2 Definitions........................................................................................... 7 p a 1.3 Class notation......................................................................................7 h 1.4 Service area restriction.........................................................................8 C 1.5 Basis for structural design.....................................................................8 5 t 1.6 Documentation.....................................................................................8 r 2 Deviations from the rules....................................................................... 9 a P 2.1 General...............................................................................................9 Section 2 Arrangements........................................................................................... 10 1 Arrangements....................................................................................... 10 1.1 Cargo securing...................................................................................10 1.2 Personnel protection........................................................................... 10 Section 3 Open sea operations.................................................................................11 1 Design Loads........................................................................................ 11 1.1 Design accelerations........................................................................... 11 1.2 Design loads......................................................................................11 2 Structural strength............................................................................... 11 2.1 Foundations....................................................................................... 11 2.2 Deck structure................................................................................... 11 3 Stability, watertight and weathertight integrity....................................12 3.1 General............................................................................................. 12 3.2 Drainage capacity on exposed deck for open landing crafts...................... 12 3.3 Accumulated water on deck of closed landing craft................................. 12 3.4 Minimum reserve buoyancy................................................................. 12 3.5 Weathertight and watertight integrity....................................................12 3.6 Intact stability................................................................................... 12 3.7 Damage stability................................................................................ 13 3.8 Survival criteria..................................................................................13 4 Piping systems......................................................................................13 4.1 Fuel capacity..................................................................................... 13 Rules for classification: High speed and light craft — DNVGL-RU-HSLC-Pt5Ch8. Edition December 2015 Page 4 Naval landing craft DNV GL AS 5 Fire safety............................................................................................ 13 s 5.1 General............................................................................................. 13 t n 5.2 Means of escape................................................................................ 14 e t 5.3 Classification of space, use and structural fire protection......................... 14 n o 5.4 Material requirements and arrangements...............................................14 C 5.5 Ventilation......................................................................................... 14 8 5.6 Fire detection systems........................................................................ 15 r 5.7 Fire extinguishing system....................................................................15 e t 5.8 Fire pumps and fire main.................................................................... 15 p 5.9 Miscellaneous.....................................................................................16 a h 6 Safe evacuation.................................................................................... 16 C 6.1 General............................................................................................. 16 5 t 6.2 Safety equipment............................................................................... 16 r 6.3 Personal lifesaving equipment.............................................................. 17 a P 6.4 Survival craft..................................................................................... 17 6.5 Operational readiness, maintenance and inspection.................................17 6.6 Alarm system.................................................................................... 17 6.7 Instructions and muster lists............................................................... 17 Section 4 Beaching operations................................................................................. 18 1 Special considerations for beaching operations.................................... 18 1.1 General............................................................................................. 18 2 Structural strength............................................................................... 18 2.1 General............................................................................................. 18 2.2 Plating.............................................................................................. 18 2.3 Bottom stiffeners................................................................................18 2.4 Structural strength - girders and web frames.........................................19 2.5 Weld connections............................................................................... 19 2.6 Rubbing strakes................................................................................. 19 2.7 Ramp structure.................................................................................. 20 2.8 Sea loads on aft structure...................................................................20 2.9 Push-out and pull-out strength............................................................ 21 2.10 Air intakes....................................................................................... 22 3 Piping systems......................................................................................22 3.1 General............................................................................................. 22 3.2 Sea cooling water and sea inlets..........................................................22 3.3 Fuel tanks......................................................................................... 22 4 Machinery............................................................................................. 22 4.1 Protection of propellers, waterjets and rudders.......................................22
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ma2014-8 Marine Accident Investigation Report
    MA2014-8 MARINE ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT August 29, 2014 The objective of the investigation conducted by the Japan Transport Safety Board in accordance with the Act for Establishment of the Japan Transport Safety Board is to determine the causes of an accident and damage incidental to such an accident, thereby preventing future accidents and reducing damage. It is not the purpose of the investigation to apportion blame or liability. Norihiro Goto Chairman, Japan Transport Safety Board Note: This report is a translation of the Japanese original investigation report. The text in Japanese shall prevail in the interpretation of the report. MARINE ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT Vessel type and name: Container ship BAI CHAY BRIDGE IMO number: 9463346 Gross tonnage: 44,234 tons Vessel type and name: Fishing vessel SEIHOU MARU No. 18 Fishing vessel registration number: KO2-6268 Gross tonnage: 18 tons Accident type: Collision Date and time: At around 23:12 (JST) on January 23, 2013 Location: On a true bearing of approximately 116º and at a distance of 11.4 nautical miles from the Katsuura Lighthouse, Katsuura City, Chiba Prefecture (Approximately 35°03.3'N 140°31.6'E) August 7, 2014 Adopted by the Japan Transport Safety Board Chairman Norihiro Goto Member Tetuo Yokoyama Member Kuniaki Syouji Member Toshiyuki Ishikawa Member Mina Nemoto SYNOPSIS < Summary of the Accident > On January 23, 2013, the container ship BAI CHAY BRIDGE with the master, third officer and 21 other crewmembers on board was proceeding southwestward to Keihin Port, and the fishing vessel SEIHOU MARU No. 18 with the skipper and five other crewmembers on board was proceeding north-northeastward to Choshi Port.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FEASIBLITY of the OVER-THE-HORIZON AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT for U.S. NAVY and MARINE CORPS FORCES a Thesis Presented To
    THE FEASIBLITY OF THE OVER-THE-HORIZON AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT FOR U.S. NAVY AND MARINE CORPS FORCES A thesis presented to the Faculty of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff Colege in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE STEPHEN L. GOERTZEN, LCDR, USN B.S., U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland, 1982 Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 1993 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. MASTER OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Name of Candidate: LCDR Stephen L. Goertzen, USN Thesis Title: The Feasibility of the Over-the-Horizon Amphibious Assault for the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps Forces Approved by: u , Thesis Committee Chaiman LTCOL W. A. Sp , Member Accepted this 4th day of June 1993 by: , Director, Graduate Degree Philip J. Brookes, Ph.D. Programs The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the student author and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College or any other governmental agency. (References to this study should include the foregoing statement.) ABSTRACT THE FEASIBILITY OF THE OVER-THE-HORIZON AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT FOR U.S. NAVY AND MARINE CORPS FORCES: An analysis of the doctrine, equipment, and technology contributing to the feasibility of the over-the-horizon amphibious assault. By Lieutenant Commander Stephen L. Goertzen, USN, 128 pages. This study is an analysis of the tactics,techniques, procedures, doctrine, equipment, and technology utilized in over-the-horizon amphibious assaults. The study examines the issues surrounding current feasibility of the assault, as well as future feasibility of the assault.
    [Show full text]
  • DNVGL-RU-SHIP Pt.5 Ch.12 Fishing Vessels
    RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION Ships Edition July 2017 Amended July 2018 Part 5 Ship types Chapter 12 Fishing vessels The content of this service document is the subject of intellectual property rights reserved by DNV GL AS ("DNV GL"). The user accepts that it is prohibited by anyone else but DNV GL and/or its licensees to offer and/or perform classification, certification and/or verification services, including the issuance of certificates and/or declarations of conformity, wholly or partly, on the basis of and/or pursuant to this document whether free of charge or chargeable, without DNV GL's prior written consent. DNV GL is not responsible for the consequences arising from any use of this document by others. The electronic pdf version of this document, available free of charge from http://www.dnvgl.com, is the officially binding version. DNV GL AS FOREWORD DNV GL rules for classification contain procedural and technical requirements related to obtaining and retaining a class certificate. The rules represent all requirements adopted by the Society as basis for classification. © DNV GL AS July 2017 Any comments may be sent by e-mail to [email protected] If any person suffers loss or damage which is proved to have been caused by any negligent act or omission of DNV GL, then DNV GL shall pay compensation to such person for his proved direct loss or damage. However, the compensation shall not exceed an amount equal to ten times the fee charged for the service in question, provided that the maximum compensation shall never exceed USD 2 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress
    Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress September 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL32665 Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The current and planned size and composition of the Navy, the annual rate of Navy ship procurement, the prospective affordability of the Navy’s shipbuilding plans, and the capacity of the U.S. shipbuilding industry to execute the Navy’s shipbuilding plans have been oversight matters for the congressional defense committees for many years. In December 2016, the Navy released a force-structure goal that calls for achieving and maintaining a fleet of 355 ships of certain types and numbers. The 355-ship goal was made U.S. policy by Section 1025 of the FY2018 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 2810/P.L. 115- 91 of December 12, 2017). The Navy and the Department of Defense (DOD) have been working since 2019 to develop a successor for the 355-ship force-level goal. The new goal is expected to introduce a new, more distributed fleet architecture featuring a smaller proportion of larger ships, a larger proportion of smaller ships, and a new third tier of large unmanned vehicles (UVs). On June 17, 2021, the Navy released a long-range Navy shipbuilding document that presents the Biden Administration’s emerging successor to the 355-ship force-level goal. The document calls for a Navy with a more distributed fleet architecture, including 321 to 372 manned ships and 77 to 140 large UVs. A September 2021 Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report estimates that the fleet envisioned in the document would cost an average of between $25.3 billion and $32.7 billion per year in constant FY2021 dollars to procure.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Postgraduate School Thesis
    NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS A STUDY OF THE RUSSIAN ACQUISITION OF THE FRENCH MISTRAL AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT WARSHIPS by Patrick Thomas Baker June 2011 Thesis Advisor: Mikhail Tsypkin Second Reader: Douglas Porch Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2011 Master‘s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS A Study of the Russian Acquisition of the French Mistral Amphibious Assault Warships 6. AUTHOR(S) Patrick Thomas Baker 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ghost Ship on the Delaware
    The Ghost Ship on the Delaware By Steven Ujifusa For PlanPhilly Thousands pass by the Ghost Ship on the Delaware River every day. They speed past it on Columbus Boulevard, I-95, and the Walt Whitman Bridge. They glance at it while shopping at IKEA. For some, it is just another eyesore on Philadelphia’s desolate waterfront, no different from the moldering old cruisers and troop transports moored in the South Philadelphia Navy Yard. The Ghost Ship on the Delaware. www.ssunitedstatesconservancy.org Some may pull over to the side of the road and take a closer look through a barbed wire fence. They then realize that the Ghost Ship is of a different pedigree than an old troop transport. Its two finned funnels, painted in faded red, white and blue, are dramatically raked back. Its superstructure is low and streamlined, lacking the balconies and large picture windows that make today’s cruise ships look like floating condominiums. Its hull is yacht-like, defined by a thrusting prow and gracefully rounded stern. Looking across the river to Camden, one might see that the hull of the Ghost Ship bears more than a passing resemblance to the low-slung, sweeping one of the battleship U.S.S. New Jersey. This ship is imposing without being ponderous, sleek but still dignified. Even though her engines fell silent almost forty years ago, she still appears to be thrusting ahead at forty knots into the gray seas of the North Atlantic. Finally, if one takes the time to look at the bow of the Ghost Ship, it is clear that she has no ordinary name.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Light Amphibious Warship (LAW) Program: Background and Issues for Congress
    Navy Light Amphibious Warship (LAW) Program: Background and Issues for Congress Updated July 22, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46374 SUMMARY R46374 Navy Light Amphibious Warship (LAW) July 22, 2020 Program: Background and Issues for Congress Ronald O'Rourke The Navy’s new Light Amphibious Warship (LAW) program envisions procuring a class of 28 to Specialist in Naval Affairs 30 new amphibious ships to support the Marine Corps, particularly in implementing a new Marine Corps operational concept called Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations (EABO). The Navy’s proposed FY2021 budget requests $30 million in research and development funding for initial industry studies and concept design work on the ship. The Navy envisions procuring the ships on an expedited schedule, with the first LAWs potentially being procured in FY2023 and a total of 28 notionally being procured by FY2026. The EABO concept was developed with an eye toward potential conflict scenarios with China in the Western Pacific. Under the concept, the Marine Corps envisions, among other things, having reinforced-platoon-sized Marine Corps units maneuver around the theater, moving from island to island, to fire anti-ship cruise missiles (ASCMs) and perform other missions so as to contribute, alongside Navy and other U.S. military forces, to U.S. operations to counter and deny sea control to Chinese forces. The LAW ships would be instrumental to these operations, with LAWs embarking, transporting, landing, and subsequently reembarking these small Marine Corps units. As conceived by the Navy and Marine Corps, LAWs would be much smaller and individually much less expensive to procure and operate than the Navy’s current amphibious ships.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthur Henry Nions D-Day Landings in Normandy June 6Th 1944 I Joined
    Arthur Henry Nions D-Day Landings In Normandy June 6th 1944 I joined H.M.S. Empire Battleaxe on the 22 December 1943 in Glasgow, Scotland. We then carried out invasion exercises near Cromarty in the north of Scotland. We then sailed to Southampton after all the training. Three days before we left for the invasion we were sealed to ship, which means no shore leave. At 9pm on the 4th May 1944, we set sail from Southampton for the invasion of France. The weather was very rough with heavy seas and we were ordered to return to port. At 9pm on the 5th June 1944, we once again sailed from Southampton harbour towards the French coast. In our flotilla were H.M.S. Glenearn, flotilla leader, Empire Battleaxe, second in line (commodore ship), Empire Broadsword and Empire Cutlass. All these ships in our flotilla were (L.S.I.’s), which stood for Landing Ship Infantry. The ships carried 16 L.C.A. (landing craft assault) and 2 L.C.P. (landing craft personnel). We carried on board Royal Marine Commando’s and infantry troops. We arrived off Gold beachhead before daylight on the 6th June, as one of the missions of the marines were to clear the beaches of mines and obstructions before landing our troops. As daylight broke over the beachhead, the sight of the masses of ships and landing craft was unbelievable, if not actually seen. We disembarked the Royal Marines into the landing craft; they went into the beach first to clear mines and obstructions. After that, all of the ships in our sector began loading the landing craft with troops; the sea was swarming with ships and landing craft of all types, carrying tanks and soldiers.
    [Show full text]
  • Interviewee: Marvin J. Perrett, USCGR World War II U
    U.S. Coast Guard Oral History Program Interviewee: Marvin J. Perrett, USCGR World War II U. S. Coast Guard Veteran Interviewer: Scott Price, Deputy Historian Date of Interview: 18 June 2003 Place: U. S. Coast Guard Headquarters, Washington, D.C. Marvin Perrett joined the U.S. Coast Guard during World War II and served aboard the Coast Guard-manned attack transport USS Bayfield (APA-33) as a coxswain of one of the Bayfield's landing craft. He was a veteran of the invasions of Normandy, Southern France, Iwo Jima and Okinawa and he even survived the "Exercise Tiger" debacle prior to the Normandy invasion. Although each of these events has received extensive coverage, his story, and the story of the thousands of young men who manned the boats that landed troops on enemy beaches, is little- known. It seems that the men who transported the troops to the beach were often been overlooked by historians, writers, and film producers. Yet, as Mr. Perret points out, without them, how would any invasion have happened? 1 Mr. Perrett's oral history is comprehensive. He describes his decision to join the Coast Guard and he then delves into the extensive training he received and how he was picked to be the sailor in charge of a landing craft. He also describes, in detail, this craft he sailed through enemy fire during the invasions he took part in. The boat he commanded was the ubiquitous LCVP, or "Landing Craft, Vehicle / Personnel. It was made primarily of wood by the famous company Higgins Industries in New Orleans.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibious Operations
    Joint Publication 3-02 OF TH NT E E A W E' L L D R I S E F E N M H D T M T Y R • A P E A C D I U • R N E I T M E A D F S O TAT E S Amphibious Operations 4 January 2019 PREFACE 1. Scope This publication provides fundamental principles and guidance for planning, conducting, and assessing amphibious operations. 2. Purpose This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS). It sets forth joint doctrine to govern the activities and performance of the Armed Forces of the United States in joint operations, and it provides considerations for military interaction with governmental and nongovernmental agencies, multinational forces, and other interorganizational partners. It provides military guidance for the exercise of authority by combatant commanders and other joint force commanders (JFCs), and prescribes joint doctrine for operations and training. It provides military guidance for use by the Armed Forces in preparing and executing their plans and orders. It is not the intent of this publication to restrict the authority of the JFC from organizing the force and executing the mission in a manner the JFC deems most appropriate to ensure unity of effort in the accomplishment of objectives. 3. Application a. Joint doctrine established in this publication applies to the Joint Staff, commanders of combatant commands, subordinate unified commands, joint task forces, subordinate components of these commands, the Services, and combat support agencies. b. This doctrine constitutes official advice concerning the enclosed subject matter; however, the judgment of the commander is paramount in all situations.
    [Show full text]
  • Apostle Islands National Lakeshore Alternatives Analysis for LCM Replacement
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Apostle Islands National Lakeshore Bayfield, WI Apostle Islands National Lakeshore Alternatives Analysis for LCM Replacement PMIS No. 161124 October 1, 2014 Contents List of Tables ..........................................................................................................ii List of Figures .........................................................................................................ii Executive Summary ...............................................................................................1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 1 Transportation Options .................................................................................................... 1 Results............................................................................................................................. 1 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ...........................................................................................................3 Background ............................................................................................................4 Missions ..................................................................................................................5 Toilet and Septic System Pumping ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Navy and Coast Guard Ships Associated with Service in Vietnam and Exposure to Herbicide Agents
    Navy and Coast Guard Ships Associated with Service in Vietnam and Exposure to Herbicide Agents Background This ships list is intended to provide VA regional offices with a resource for determining whether a particular US Navy or Coast Guard Veteran of the Vietnam era is eligible for the presumption of Agent Orange herbicide exposure based on operations of the Veteran’s ship. According to 38 CFR § 3.307(a)(6)(iii), eligibility for the presumption of Agent Orange exposure requires that a Veteran’s military service involved “duty or visitation in the Republic of Vietnam” between January 9, 1962 and May 7, 1975. This includes service within the country of Vietnam itself or aboard a ship that operated on the inland waterways of Vietnam. However, this does not include service aboard a large ocean- going ship that operated only on the offshore waters of Vietnam, unless evidence shows that a Veteran went ashore. Inland waterways include rivers, canals, estuaries, and deltas. They do not include open deep-water bays and harbors such as those at Da Nang Harbor, Qui Nhon Bay Harbor, Nha Trang Harbor, Cam Ranh Bay Harbor, Vung Tau Harbor, or Ganh Rai Bay. These are considered to be part of the offshore waters of Vietnam because of their deep-water anchorage capabilities and open access to the South China Sea. In order to promote consistent application of the term “inland waterways”, VA has determined that Ganh Rai Bay and Qui Nhon Bay Harbor are no longer considered to be inland waterways, but rather are considered open water bays.
    [Show full text]