Code Review Guide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Code Review Guide CODE REVIEW GUIDE 3.0 RELEASE Project leaders: Mr. John Doe and Jane Doe Creative Commons (CC) Attribution Free Version at: https://www.owasp.org 1 2 F I 1 Forward - Eoin Keary Introduction How to use the Code Review Guide 7 8 10 2 Secure Code Review 11 Framework Specific Configuration: Jetty 16 2.1 Why does code have vulnerabilities? 12 Framework Specific Configuration: JBoss AS 17 2.2 What is secure code review? 13 Framework Specific Configuration: Oracle WebLogic 18 2.3 What is the difference between code review and secure code review? 13 Programmatic Configuration: JEE 18 2.4 Determining the scale of a secure source code review? 14 Microsoft IIS 20 2.5 We can’t hack ourselves secure 15 Framework Specific Configuration: Microsoft IIS 40 2.6 Coupling source code review and penetration testing 19 Programmatic Configuration: Microsoft IIS 43 2.7 Implicit advantages of code review to development practices 20 2.8 Technical aspects of secure code review 21 2.9 Code reviews and regulatory compliance 22 5 A1 3 Injection 51 Injection 52 Blind SQL Injection 53 Methodology 25 Parameterized SQL Queries 53 3.1 Factors to Consider when Developing a Code Review Process 25 Safe String Concatenation? 53 3.2 Integrating Code Reviews in the S-SDLC 26 Using Flexible Parameterized Statements 54 3.3 When to Code Review 27 PHP SQL Injection 55 3.4 Security Code Review for Agile and Waterfall Development 28 JAVA SQL Injection 56 3.5 A Risk Based Approach to Code Review 29 .NET Sql Injection 56 3.6 Code Review Preparation 31 Parameter collections 57 3.7 Code Review Discovery and Gathering the Information 32 3.8 Static Code Analysis 35 3.9 Application Threat Modeling 39 4.3.2. Step 1: Decompose the Application 39 5 A2 5.4.3. Step 2: Determine and rank threats 42 5.4.4. Step 3: Determine countermeasures and mitigation 45 Broken Authentication And Session Management 3.10 Metrics and Code Review 45 60 A2 Broken Authentication 3.11 Crawling Code 49 60 Forgot Password 62 CAPTCHA 63 Out-of-Band Communication 64 4 A2 Session Management 66 .Net ASPX web.confi 67 Java web.xml 68 Reviewing by Framework 9 PHP.INI 68 Apache Struts 10 .Net ASPX 68 Java Enterprise Edition Declarative Configuration 10 Java 68 JEE Annotations 11 PHP 68 Framework Specific Configuration: Apache Tomcat 15 Session Attacks 69 3 Session Hijacking 69 4.5 Framework Specific Configuration: Jetty 84 Session Fixation 69 4.6 Framework Specific Configuration: JBoss AS 86 Session Elevation 70 4.7 Framework Specific Configuration: Oracle WebLogic 86 Server-Side Defenses for Session Management 70 4.8 Programmatic Configuration: JEE 86 .NET ASPX 70 4.9 Microsoft IIS 89 Java 70 4.10 Framework Specific Configuration: Microsoft IIS 90 PHP.INI 70 4.11 Programmatic Configuration: Microsoft IIS 93 4.12 Further IIS Configurations 94 4.13 Strongly Named Assemblies 102 4.15 Round Tripping A3 105 5 4.16 .NET Authentication Controls 107 Cross-Site Scripting (Xss) 71 Use Microsft’s Anti-XSS library 72 5 A6 .NET ASPX 72 .NET MVC 72 JavaScript and JavaScript Frameworks 72 Sensitive Data Exposure 112 1.1 Cryptographic Controls 112 1.1.1 Description 112 1.1.2 What to Review: Protection in Transit A4 112 5 1.1.3 What to Review: Protection at Rest 115 1.1.4 References 121 1.1.5 Encryption, Hashing & Salting 121 Insecure Direct Object Reference 74 1.1.6 References 124 SQL Injection 74 1.2 Reducing the attack surface 125 HTTP POST requests 74 1.2.1 Description 125 Indirect Reference Maps 75 1.2.2 What to Review 125 Data Binding Technique 75 1.2.3 References 126 Secure Design Recommendation: 76 Review Criteria 76 What the Code Reviewer needs to do: 76 Binding issues in MVC .NET 76 5 A7 A.K.A Over-Posting A.K.A Mass assignments 76 Corresponding view (HTML) 76 Recommendations 77 Missing Function Level Access Control 127 1.3.1 Authorization 127 1.3.2 Description 127 1.3.3 What to Review A5 129 5 1.4 From Access Control Cheat Sheet 131 Security Misconfiguration 78 4.1 Apache Struts 78 4.2 Java Enterprise Edition Declarative Configuration 79 4.3 JEE Annotations 83 4.4 Framework Specific Configuration: Apache Tomcat 84 4 5 A8 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) 133 5.5.4 What to Review: Potentially Vulnerable Code 156 2.1 Description 133 5.5.5 What to Review: Error Handling in IIS 158 2.2 What to Review 134 5.5.6 What to Review: Error Handling in Apache 160 2.3 References 139 5.6 What to Review: Leading Practice for Error Handling 161 5.6.1 What to Review: The Order of Catching Exceptions 162 5.6.2 What to Review: Releasing resources and good housekeeping 163 5.6.3 References A9 164 5 5.7 Reviewing Security alerts 164 5.7.1 Description 164 5.7.2 What to Review 166 Using Components With Known Vulnerabilities 140 5.7.3 References 167 3.1 Description 140 5.8 Review for active defense 167 3.2 What to Review 140 5.9 Description 167 3.3 References 141 5.10 What to Review 168 5.11 References 169 5.12 Race Conditions 169 5 A10 5.13 Description 170 5.14 What to Review 170 5.14.1 References 171 5.15 Buffer Overruns 171 Unvalidated Redirects And Forwards 142 5.15.1 Description 171 4.1 Description 142 5.15.2 What to Review: Buffer Overruns 172 4.2 What to Review 143 5.15.3 What to Review: Format Function Overruns 173 4.3 References 145 5.15.4 What to Review: Integer Overflows 174 5. AX - General 145 5.16 References 176 5.1 HTML5 145 5.1.1 Description 145 5.1.2 What to Review: Web Messaging 145 5.1.3 What to Review: Cross Origin Resource Sharing 146 6 5.1.4 What to Review: WebSockets 147 5.1.5 What to Review: Server-Sent Events 148 5.2 Same Origin Policy 148 Code Review Do’s And Dont’s 178 5.2.1 Description 149 Code Review Do’s And Dont’s 178 5.3 What to Review 150 5.4 Reviewing Logging code 150 5.4.1 Description 150 5.4.2 What to Review 151 7 5.4.3 References 152 5.5 Error Handling 152 5.5.1 Description 153 Apendix 180 5.5.2 What to Review 154 7.1 Contributors 180 5.5.3 What to Review: Failing Securely 155 5 SDLC Diagrams - 184 184 Code Review Checklist - 191 191 6 F Code Review Guide Foreword - By Eoin Keary 7 Foreword by Eoin Keary, OWASP Global Board The OWASP Code Review guide was originally born from the OWASP Testing Guide. Initially code review was covered in the Testing Guide, as it seemed like a good idea at the time. However, the topic of security code review is too big and evolved into its own stand-alone guide. I started the Code Review Project in 2006. This current edi- tion was started in April 2013 via the OWASP Project Reboot initiative and a grant from the United States Department of Homeland Security. The OWASP Code Review team consists of a small, but tal- ented, group of volunteers who should really get out more often. The volunteers have experience and a drive for the best practices in secure code review in a variety of organi- zations, from small start-ups to some of the largest software development organizations in the world. It is common knowledge that more secure software can be produced and developed in a more cost effective way when bugs are detected early on in the systems development lifecycle. Organizations with a proper code review function integrated into the software development lifecycle (SDLC) produced remarkably better code from a security stand- point. To put it simply “We can’t hack ourselves secure”. At- tackers have more time to find vulnerabilities on a system than the time allocated to a defender. Hacking our way se- cure amounts to an uneven battlefield, asymmetric warfare, and a losing battle. By necessity, this guide does not cover all programming lan- guages. It mainly focuses on C#/.NET and Java, but includes C/C++, PHP and other languages where possible. However, the techniques advocated in the book can be easily adapted to almost any code environment. Fortunately (or unfortu- nately), the security flaws in web applications are remark- ably consistent across programming languages. Eoin Keary, OWASP Board Member, April 19, 2013 8 Introduction - Contents I INTRODUCTION Welcome to the second edition of the OWASP Code Review Guide Project. The second edition brings the successful OWASP Code Review Guide up to date with current threats and countermeasures. This ver- sion also includes new content reflecting the OWASP communities’ experiences of secure code review best practices. C CONTENTS The Second Edition of the Code Review Guide has been developed to advise software developers and management on the best practices in secure code review, and how it can be used within a secure soft- ware development life-cycle (S-SDLC). The guide begins with sections that introduce the reader to secure code review and how it can be introduced into a company’s S-SDLC. It then concentrates on specific technical subjects and provides examples of what a reviewer should look for when reviewing technical code. Specifically the guide covers: Overview This section introduces the reader to secure code review and the advantages it can bring to a devel- opment organization.
Recommended publications
  • A Programmer's Guide to C
    Download from Wow! eBook <www.wowebook.com> For your convenience Apress has placed some of the front matter material after the index. Please use the Bookmarks and Contents at a Glance links to access them. Contents at a Glance Preface ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� xxv About the Author ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� xxvii About the Technical Reviewer ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������� xxix Acknowledgments ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� xxxi Introduction ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� xxxiii ■■Chapter 1: C# and the .NET Runtime and Libraries �����������������������������������������������������1 ■■Chapter 2: C# QuickStart and Developing in C# ����������������������������������������������������������3 ■■Chapter 3: Classes 101 ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������11 ■■Chapter 4: Base Classes and Inheritance ������������������������������������������������������������������19 ■■Chapter 5: Exception Handling ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������33 ■■Chapter 6: Member Accessibility and Overloading ���������������������������������������������������47 ■■Chapter 7: Other Class Details �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������57
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Step Scanning in ZAP Handling Sequences in OWASP ZAP
    M.Sc. Thesis Master of Science in Engineering Multi-step scanning in ZAP Handling sequences in OWASP ZAP Lars Kristensen (s072662) Stefan Østergaard Pedersen (s072653) Kongens Lyngby 2014 DTU Compute Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science Technical University of Denmark Matematiktorvet Building 303B 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark Phone +45 4525 3031 [email protected] www.compute.dtu.dk Summary English This report presents a solution for scanning sequences of HTTP requests in the open source penetration testing tool, Zed Attack Proxy or ZAP. The report documents the analysis, design and implementation phases of the project, as well as explain how the different test scenarios were set up and used for verification of the functionality devel- oped in this project. The proposed solution will serve as a proof-of-concept, before being integrated with the publically available version of the application. Dansk Denne rapport præsenterer en løsning der gør det muligt at skanne HTTP fore- spørgsler i open source værktøjet til penetrationstest, Zed Attack Proxy eller ZAP. Rapporten dokumenterer faserne for analyse, design og implementering af løsningen, samt hvordan forskellige test scenarier blev opstillet og anvendt til at verificere funk- tionaliteten udviklet i dette projekt. Den foreslåede løsning vil fungere som et proof- of-concept, før det integreres med den offentligt tilgængelige version af applikationen. ii Preface This thesis was prepared at the department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science at the Technical University of Denmark in fulfilment of the requirements for acquiring a M.Sc. degree in respectivly Computer Science and Engineering, and in Digital Media Engineering. Kongens Lyngby, September 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Code Review Guide
    CODE REVIEW GUIDE 2.0 RELEASE Project leaders: Larry Conklin and Gary Robinson Creative Commons (CC) Attribution Free Version at: https://www.owasp.org 1 F I 1 Forward - Eoin Keary Introduction How to use the Code Review Guide 7 8 10 2 Secure Code Review 11 Framework Specific Configuration: Jetty 16 2.1 Why does code have vulnerabilities? 12 Framework Specific Configuration: JBoss AS 17 2.2 What is secure code review? 13 Framework Specific Configuration: Oracle WebLogic 18 2.3 What is the difference between code review and secure code review? 13 Programmatic Configuration: JEE 18 2.4 Determining the scale of a secure source code review? 14 Microsoft IIS 20 2.5 We can’t hack ourselves secure 15 Framework Specific Configuration: Microsoft IIS 40 2.6 Coupling source code review and penetration testing 19 Programmatic Configuration: Microsoft IIS 43 2.7 Implicit advantages of code review to development practices 20 2.8 Technical aspects of secure code review 21 2.9 Code reviews and regulatory compliance 22 5 A1 3 Injection 51 Injection 52 Blind SQL Injection 53 Methodology 25 Parameterized SQL Queries 53 3.1 Factors to Consider when Developing a Code Review Process 25 Safe String Concatenation? 53 3.2 Integrating Code Reviews in the S-SDLC 26 Using Flexible Parameterized Statements 54 3.3 When to Code Review 27 PHP SQL Injection 55 3.4 Security Code Review for Agile and Waterfall Development 28 JAVA SQL Injection 56 3.5 A Risk Based Approach to Code Review 29 .NET Sql Injection 56 3.6 Code Review Preparation 31 Parameter collections 57 3.7 Code Review Discovery and Gathering the Information 32 3.8 Static Code Analysis 35 3.9 Application Threat Modeling 39 4.3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • WEB SERVICES TESTING in This Pentest Magazine We Prepared Special Combination of Topics Which, for Sure, Will Interest You
    ��������� ������������������ �������������������� �������������� ������������� ������������ ������������ ������� � � � � � � � � � �� ����������������� ���� ������������������������������������ ������ ����������������� �������� ��������� ���������������������� ��������������������� � ���������������� �� ��������������������� ����������������������������� ������������ pwnplug - Dave-ad3-203x293mm.indd 1 1/5/12 3:32 PM EDITOR’S NOTE Dear Readers! WEB SERVICES TESTING In this Pentest Magazine we prepared special combination of topics which, for sure, will interest you. Security Assessment of web 06 Services Let’s take a closer look on what you can find there. By Rudra Peram In the section Web services testing If you go to page 6, you’ll find there Rudra Peram, who Web services which are designed primarily for is a Software Security Analyst and has over 10 years of systems to interact with each other and are not experience in the field of Information Technology focusing on Web Application Security, Application Development and intended to be consumed directly by human beings. Software. In his article entitled: Security Assessment of This assumption has severe consequences in several Web Services he will guide us, among other things, through areas: developers are not as security conscious when several ways of attacking web services. In the next article,Jan will lead us,with examples, through developing web services. Negative testing of these popular web services with which we meet daily. For example services and Security teams are not focusing on these social networks. Jan will finish his voyage on storage files in web cloud. services either. The level of maturity of automated Right next to the Jan’s article you will find something security testing tools for web services is not helping which gives you an overview in testing web services. In this the situation either. article Malhotra will show you several forms of web services testing and will explain why and how we should test them.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultimate C#, .Net Interview Q&AE-Book
    Register your resume: www.terrafirmajobs.com _________________________________________________ www.terrafirmajobs.com Ultimate C#, .Net Interview Q&AE-book Free E-books available with Terra Firma Java Interview Q&A Terra Firma’s Interview Kit Are you stressed at your Desk Restore the rhythm of your life IT Resume writing tips Heart-Care Tips To get these free e-books, email to: [email protected] with the title of the e-book. Copy Right Note You are permitted to freely distribute/print the unmodified version of this issue/e-book/article. We are not attempting to obtain commercial benefit from the valuable work of the authors and the Editor/Publisher claims the ‘fair use’ of copyrighted material. If you think that by publishing a particular material, your copyright has been violated, please let us know. The Editor/Publisher is not responsible for statements or opinions expressed herein nor do such statements necessarily express the views of Editor/Publisher. 1 More Career Tips: http://www.terrafirmajobs.com/ITpros/IT_resources.asp?id=4 ______________________________________________________________________________ Register your resume: www.terrafirmajobs.com _________________________________________________ Index Chapter Name Page 1) C# interview Questions and Answers. 4 1.1) Advance C# interview Questions 2) General Questions 17 2.1 ) General Questions 2.2 ) Methods and Property 2.3) Assembly Questions 2.4) XML Documentation Question 2.5) Debugging and Testing 3) ADO.net and Database Question 26 4) C#, DOT NET, XML, IIS Interview Questions 28 4.1 ) Framework. 4.2 ) COM 4.3 ) OOPS 4.4 ) C# Language Features 4.5 ) Access Specifier 4.6 ) Constructor / Destructor 4.7 ) ADO.net 4.8 ) ASP.net 4.8.1) Session.
    [Show full text]
  • Інформаційна Система Аналізу Та Розподілу Задач Для Компанії ―Apptimized Operations‖»
    МІНІСТЕРСТВО ОСВІТИ ТА НАУКИ УКРАЇНИ СУМСЬКИЙ ДЕРЖАВНИЙ УНІВЕРСИТЕТ ФАКУЛЬТЕТ ЕЛЕКТРОНІКИ ТА ІНФОРМАЦІЙНИХ ТЕХНОЛОГІЙ КАФЕДРА КОМП’ЮТЕРНИХ НАУК СЕКЦІЯ ІНФОРМАЦІЙНИХ ТЕХНОЛОГІЙ ПРОЕКТУВАННЯ КВАЛІФІКАЦІЙНА РОБОТА МАГІСТРА на тему: «Інформаційна система аналізу та розподілу задач для компанії ―Apptimized Operations‖» за освітньою програмою 8.122.00.02 «Інформаційні технології проектування» Виконавець роботи: студент групи ІТ.м.п-71 Будник Олександр Сергійович Кваліфікаційну роботу захищено на засіданні ЕК з оцінкою « » грудня 2018 р. Науковий керівник к.т.н., доц., Гайдабрус Б.В. (підпис) Голова комісії к.т.н. Дорошенко С. О. (підпис) Засвідчую, що у цій дипломній роботі немає запозичень з праць інших авторів без відповідних посилань. Студент _________________ (підпис) Суми-2018 Сумський державний університет Факультет електроніки та інформаційних технологій Кафедра комп’ютерних наук Секція інформаційних технологій проектування Спеціальністьго 122 «Комп’ютерні науки» Освітньо-професійна програма «Інформаційні технології проектування» ЗАТВЕРДЖУЮ Зав. секцією ІТП В. В. Шендрик « » 2018 р. ЗАВДАННЯ на кваліфікаційну роботу магістра студентові Будник Олександр Сергійович (прізвище, ім’я, по батькові) 1 Тема проекту Інформаційна система аналізу та розподілу робочих задач для компанії ―Apptimized Operations‖ затверджена наказом по університету від «20» листопада 2018 р. №2458-III 2 Термін здачі студентом закінченого проекту «_12__» ___грудня___ 2018 р. 3 Вхідні дані до проекту Для розробки продукту даного проекту – інформаційної системи аналізу
    [Show full text]
  • Securing Devops — Detection of Vulnerabilities in CD Pipelines
    Institute of Software Technology Reliable Software Systems University of Stuttgart Universitätsstraße 38 D–70569 Stuttgart Masterarbeit Securing DevOps — Detection of vulnerabilities in CD pipelines Christina Paule Course of Study: Softwaretechnik Examiner: Dr.-Ing. André van Hoorn Supervisors: Thomas Düllmann, M.Sc., University of Stuttgart Andreas Falk, Managing Consultant, NovaTec Consulting GmbH Andreas Reinhardt, Senior Consultant, NovaTec Consulting GmbH Commenced: October 19, 2017 Completed: April 19, 2018 Abstract Nowadays more and more companies implement the DevOps approach. DevOps was developed to enable more efficient collaboration between development (dev) and opera- tion (ops) teams. An important reason why companies use the DevOps approach is that they aspire to continuously deliver applications using agile methods. The continuous delivery (CD) process can be achieved with the aid of the DevOps approach, of which the CD pipeline is an elementary component. Because of the fact, that a new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) will enter into force in the European Union in May 2018, many companies are looking at how they can increase the security level of their applications. The regulation requires that companies which process personal data have to secure their applications. An attacker can gain access to personal data if there are vulnerabilities in applications. This problem can be applied to CD pipelines. If CD pipelines have vulnerabilities then an exploitation of vulnerabilities can lead to a damage of the CD pipeline and the delivery process. One example is that the network can be scanned by running injected malicious unit tests. This can have a negative effect on the image of the company which operates and uses CD pipelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing​ ​Security​ ​Of​ ​Html5:​ ​Automated Scanning
    Escola Tècnica Superior d’Enginyeria Informàtica ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Universitat Politècnica de València ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Testing security of html5: automated ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ scanning vulnerabilities ​ ​ Trabajo Fin de Máster ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Máster Universitario en Ingeniería Informática ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Autor: Javier Gil Pascual ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Tutor: Jose Ismael Ripoll Ripoll ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Hugo Jonker (externo) ​ ​ ​ ​ 2016-2017 Testing security of HTML5: detecting and mitigating vulnerabilities ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 2 Resumen HTML5 tiene varios nuevos componentes como XHR-Level2, DOM, Storage. Con esta introducción de nuevas tecnologías, HTML5 también lleva consigo potenciales riesgos de seguridad. Algunos originados de los elementos del estándar en sí, otros de la implementación particular del estándar en cada navegador, y otros del cuidado que pongan los desarrolladores a la hora de escribir código. En esta tesis vamos hablas de estas nuevas estrategias de ataque y posibles amenazas. También cubriremos cómo detectar estas vulnerabilidad automatizando el proceso. Esta tesis describe una serie de vulnerabilidad web, sobre las que hemos construido unos test para probar las capacidad de algunas herramientas de pentesting. Basándonos en los resultados observados, discutiremos futuros resultados. ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Palabras clave: HTML5, pentesting, web, seguridad. ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Abstract HTML5 has several new components like XHR-Level2, DOM, Storage. With any major introduction of new features, HTML5 also brings with it potential security vulnerabilities. It allows crafting stealth attack vectors and adding risk to end client. Some originate from elements of the standard itself, some from implementations of the standard in each browser, and some from the care that developers do (or do not) take in building their HTML5 code. In this thesis we are going to talk about this new attack surface and possible threats. We are also going to cover how to automatically detect these possible vulnerabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • VSM Cover Snipe
    0808vsm_RdrsChoice_C2_final 8/14/08 11:55 AM Page 1 SPECIAL SECTION: 2008 BUYERS GUIDE 2008 Buyers Guide Readers Choice Awards 4 Product Listings 6 Third-Party Tools Put the “Rapid” in RAD 2 Project3 7/10/08 1:32 PM Page 1 Project3 7/10/08 1:33 PM Page 2 0808vsm_BGEdNote_2.final 7/24/08 2:05 PM Page 2 Editor’s Note THIRD-PARTY TOOLS BY PATRICK MEADER PUT THE “RAPID” IN RAD editor in chief Welcome to the Visual Studio Magazine 2008 Buyers Guide supplement! Every year, the editors of Visual Studio Magazine survey include anything that covers DVD- or online-based training. the third-party market of tools and services for Visual Studio We think K-Source is intriguing for several reasons, not least and compile a list of relevant products in areas that are of the because it brings the notion of suites of controls that have most interest to Visual Studio developers. This year we com- proven so popular in the VS market to the area of training. K- piled a list of more than 400 products and services across 22 cat- Source gives you the ability to package together a wide range egories (these begin on p.6).Note that you won’t see any prod- of online training subjects for your entire development team ucts from Microsoft listed in the categories; this is a survey of (see VSM’s review of K-Source on p.12 of the August issue). third-party solution providers, which by definition excludes The listings in the print version of this supplement provide Microsoft’s offerings.When compiling the list,we allow a prod- the product name,company,and a Web site for each of the prod- uct to be listed in only one category.In cases where a product fits ucts within a given category.You can find a more detailed version more than one category (and this is frequently the case), we of these listings at VisualStudioMagazine.com (Locator+ attempt to choose the closest category fit for that product.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Analysis of the Automated Penetration Testing Tools
    Comparative Analysis of the Automated Penetration Testing Tools MSc Internship Cybersecurity Mandar Prashant Shah Student ID: x18139469 School of Computing National College of Ireland Supervisor: Dr. Muhammad Iqbal National College of Ireland MSc Project Submission Sheet School of Computing Student Name: Mandar Prashant Shah Student ID: X18139469 Programme: MSc Cybersecurity Year: 2019 Module: Internship Thesis Supervisor: Dr Muhammad Iqbal Submission Due Date: 08/01/2020 Project Title: Comparative analysis of the automated penetration testing tools Word Count: 8573 Page Count 25 I hereby certify that the information contained in this (my submission) is information pertaining to research I conducted for this project. All information other than my own contribution will be fully referenced and listed in the relevant bibliography section at the rear of the project. ALL internet material must be referenced in the bibliography section. Students are required to use the Referencing Standard specified in the report template. To use other author's written or electronic work is illegal (plagiarism) and may result in disciplinary action. I agree to an electronic copy of my thesis being made publicly available on NORMA the National College of Ireland’s Institutional Repository for consultation. Signature: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Date: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS AND CHECKLIST Attach a completed copy of this sheet to each project (including multiple □ copies) Attach a Moodle submission receipt of the online project □ submission, to each project (including multiple copies). You must ensure that you retain a HARD COPY of the project, □ both for your own reference and in case a project is lost or mislaid. It is not sufficient to keep a copy on computer.
    [Show full text]
  • < Day Day up > Visual Studio Hacks by James Avery
    < Day Day Up > Visual Studio Hacks By James Avery ............................................... Publisher: O'Reilly Pub Date: March 2005 ISBN: 0-596-00847-3 Pages: 500 Table of Contents | Index | Examples | Errata This hands-on guide is designed for developers who want to go far beyond the obvious features of Visual Studio--the most powerful, feature-rich Integrated Development Environment (IDE) on the market today. It takes the reader on a detailed tour through code editor hacks, all manners of customization, even external tools such as PowerToys. Full of valuable tips, tools, and tricks. < Day Day Up > < Day Day Up > Visual Studio Hacks By James Avery ............................................... Publisher: O'Reilly Pub Date: March 2005 ISBN: 0-596-00847-3 Pages: 500 Table of Contents | Index | Examples | Errata Copyright credits Credits About the Author Contributors Acknowledgments Preface Preface Why Visual Studio Hacks? How to Use This Book An Important Note About Keyboard Shortcuts How This Book Is Organized Conventions Using Code Examples Safari Enabled How to Contact Us Got a Hack? Chapter 1. Master Projects and Solutions Section 1.1. Hacks 1-5 Hack 1. Manage Projects and Solutions Hack 2. Master Assembly and Project References Hack 3. Organize Projects and Solutions Hack 4. Hack the Project and Solution Files Hack 5. Remove SourceSafe Bindings Chapter 2. Master the Editor Section 2.1. Hacks 6-15 Hack 6. Master the Clipboard Hack 7. Make Pasting into Visual Studio Easier Hack 8. Master IntelliSense Hack 9. Master Regions Hack 10. Add Guidelines to the Text Editor Hack 11. Select the Best Editor Hack 12. Customize Syntax Coloring Hack 13.
    [Show full text]
  • 24 DEADLY SINS of SOFTWARE SECURITY Programming Flaws and How to Fix Them
    REVIEWS FOR 24 DEADLY SINS OF SOFTWARE SECURITY “We are still paying for the security sins of the past and we are doomed to failure if we don’t learn from our history of poorly written software. From some of the most respected authors in the industry, this hard-hitting book is a must-read for any software developer or security zealot. Repeat after me–‘Thou shall not commit these sins!’” —George Kurtz, co-author of all six editions of Hacking Exposed and senior vice-president and general manager, Risk and Compliance Business Unit, McAfee Security “This little gem of a book provides advice on how to avoid 24 serious problems in your programs—and how to check to see if they are present in others. Their presentation is simple, straightforward, and thorough. They explain why these are sins and what can be done about them. This is an essential book for every programmer, regardless of the language they use. It will be a welcome addition to my bookshelf, and to my teaching material. Well done!” —Matt Bishop, Department of Computer Science, University of California at Davis “The authors have demonstrated once again why they’re the ‘who’s who’ of software security. The 24 Deadly Sins of Software Security is a tour de force for developers, security pros, project managers, and anyone who is a stakeholder in the development of quality, reliable, and thoughtfully-secured code. The book graphically illustrates the most common and dangerous mistakes in multiple languages (C++, C#, Java, Ruby, Python, Perl, PHP, and more) and numerous known-good practices for mitigating these vulnerabilities and ‘redeeming’ past sins.
    [Show full text]