Simran Shah Singh IB/05/09 Group-2 (Finance) FOUNDATION of APPLE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Simran Shah Singh IB/05/09 Group-2 (Finance) FOUNDATION of APPLE Apple Inc. Simran Shah Singh IB/05/09 Group-2 (finance) FOUNDATION OF APPLE Apple was established on April 1, 1976, by Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak and Ronald Wayne to sell the Apple I personal computer kit, a computer single handedly designed by Wozniak. The kits were hand-built by Wozniak and first shown to the public at the Homebrew Computer Club. The Apple I was sold as another board (with CPU, RAM, and basic textual-video chips), which is less than what is today considered a complete personal computer. The Apple I went on sale in July 1976 and was market-priced at $666.66 ($2,690 in 2013 dollars, adjusted for inflation). Apple was incorporated January 3, 1977, without Wayne, who sold his share of the company back to Jobs and Wozniak for $800. Multi-millionaire Mike Markkula provided essential business expertise and funding of $250,000 during the incorporation of Apple. During the first five years of operations, revenues doubled every four months, an average growth rate of 700%. The Apple II, also invented by Wozniak, was introduced on April 16, 1977, at the first West Coast Computer Faire. It differed from its major rivals, the TRS- 80 and Commodore PET, due to its character cell-based color graphics and an open architecture. While early models used ordinary cassette tapes as storage devices, they were superseded by the introduction of a 5 1/4 inch floppy disk drive and interface, the Disk II. The Apple II was chosen to be the desktop platform for the first "killer app" of the business world, VisiCalc, a spreadsheet program. VisiCalc created a business market for the Apple II and gave home users compatibility with the office, an additional reason to buy an Apple II. Apple was a distant third place to Commodore and Tandy until VisiCalc came along. By the end of the 1970s, Apple had a staff of computer designers and a production line. The company introduced the Apple III in May 1980 in an attempt to compete with IBM and Microsoft in the business and corporate computing market. Jobs and several Apple employees, including Jef Raskin, visited Xerox PARC in December 1979 to see the Xerox Alto. Xerox granted Apple engineers three days of access to the PARC facilities in return for the option to buy 100,000 shares (800,000 split-adjusted shares) of Apple at the pre-IPO price of $10 a share. Jobs was immediately convinced that all future computers would use a graphical user interface (GUI), and development of a GUI began for the Apple Lisa. On December 12, 1980, Apple went public at $22 per share, generating more capital than any IPO since Ford Motor Company in 1956 and instantly creating more millionaires (about 300) than any company in history. 1981–85: Lisa and Macintosh Apple's "1984" television ad, set in adystopian future modeled after the George Orwell novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, set the tone for the introduction of the Macintosh. Apple began working on the Apple Lisa in 1978. In 1982, Jobs was pushed from the Lisa team due to infighting. Jobs took over Jef Raskin's low-cost-computer project, the Macintosh. A race broke out between the Lisa team and the Macintosh team over which product would ship first. Lisa won the race in 1983 and became the first personal computer sold to the public with a GUI, but was a commercial failure due to its high price tag and limited software titles. The first Macintosh, released in 1984 In 1984, Apple next launched the Macintosh. Its debut was announced by the now famous $1.5 million television commercial "1984". It was directed by Ridley Scott and was aired during the third quarter of Super Bowl XVIII on January 22, 1984. It is now hailed as a watershed event for Apple's success and a "masterpiece". The Macintosh initially sold well, but follow-up sales were not strong due to its high price and limited range of software titles. The Macintosh was the first personal computer to be sold without a programming language at all. The machine's fortunes changed with the introduction of the LaserWriter, the first PostScript laser printer to be sold at a reasonable price, and PageMaker, an early desktop publishing package. It has been suggested that the combination of these three products was responsible for the creation of the desktop publishing market. The Mac was particularly powerful in the desktop publishing market due to its advanced graphics capabilities, which had necessarily been built in to create the intuitive Macintosh GUI. In 1985 a power struggle developed between Jobs and CEO John Sculley, who had been hired two years earlier. The Apple board of directors instructed Sculley to "contain" Jobs and limit his ability to launch expensive forays into untested products. Rather than submit to Sculley's direction, Jobs attempted to oust him from his leadership role at Apple. Sculley found out that Jobs had been attempting to organize a coup and called a board meeting at which Apple's board of directors sided with Sculley and removed Jobs from his managerial duties. Jobs resigned from Apple and founded NeXT Inc. the same year. 1986–97: Decline See also: Timeline of Apple II family and Timeline of Macintosh models The Macintosh Portable was Apple's first "portable" Macintosh computer, released in 1989. The Macintosh Portable was introduced in 1989 and was designed to be just as powerful as a desktop Macintosh, but weighed a bulky 7.5 kilograms (17 lb) with a 12-hour battery life. After the Macintosh Portable, Apple introduced the PowerBook in 1991. The same year, Apple introduced System 7, a major upgrade to the operating system which added color to the interface and introduced new networking capabilities. It remained the architectural basis for Mac OS until 2001. The success of the PowerBook and other products brought increasing revenue. For some time, Apple was doing incredibly well, introducing fresh new products and generating increasing profits in the process. The magazine MacAddict named the period between 1989 and 1991 as the "first golden age" of the Macintosh. Following the success of the Macintosh LC, Apple introduced the Centris line, a low-end Quadra, and the ill-fated Performa line that was sold with an overwhelming number of configurations and software bundles to avoid competing with the various consumer outlets such as Sears, Price Club, and Wal- Mart (the primary dealers for these models). Consumers ended up confused and did not understand the difference between models. During this time Apple experimented with a number of other failed consumer targeted products including digital cameras, portable CD audio players, speakers, video consoles, and TV appliances. Enormous resources were also invested in the problem-plagued Newton division based on John Sculley's unrealistic market forecasts. Ultimately, none of these products helped, as Apple's market share and stock prices continued to slide. Apple saw the Apple II series as too expensive to produce, while taking away sales from the low end Macintosh. In 1990, Apple released the Macintosh LC with a single expansion slot for the Apple II Card to migrate Apple II users to the Macintosh platform. Apple stopped selling the Apple II in 1993. Microsoft continued to gain market share with Windows focusing on delivering software to cheap commodity personal computers while Apple was delivering a richly engineered, but expensive, experience. Apple relied on high profit margins and never developed a clear response. Instead, they sued Microsoft for using a graphical user interface similar to the Apple Lisa in Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation. The lawsuit dragged on for years before it was finally dismissed. At the same time, a series of major product flops and missed deadlines sullied Apple's reputation, and Sculley was replaced as CEO by Michael Spindler. The Newton was Apple's first foray into the PDA markets, as well as one of the first in the industry. Despite being a financial flop at the time of its release, it helped pave the way for the Palm Pilot and Apple's own iPhone and iPad in the future. By the early 1990s, Apple was developing alternative platforms to the Macintosh, such as the A/UX. Apple had also begun to experiment in providing a Mac-only online portal which they called e-World, developed in collaboration with America Online and designed as a Mac-friendly alternative to other online services such as CompuServe. The Macintosh platform was itself becoming outdated because it was not built for multitasking, and several important software routines were programmed directly into the hardware. In addition, Apple was facing competition from OS/2 and UNIX vendors such as Sun Microsystems. The Macintosh would need to be replaced by a new platform, or reworked to run on more powerful hardware. In 1994, Apple allied with IBM and Motorola in the AIM alliance. The goal was to create a new computing platform (the PowerPC Reference Platform), which would use IBM and Motorola hardware coupled with Apple's software. The AIM alliance hoped that PReP's performance and Apple's software would leave the PC far behind, thus countering Microsoft. The same year, Apple introduced the Power Macintosh, the first of many Apple computers to use Motorola's PowerPC processor. In 1996, Michael Spindler was replaced by Gil Amelio as CEO. Gil Amelio made many changes at Apple, including extensive layoffs. After numerous failed attempts to improve Mac OS, first with the Taligent project, then later with Copland and Gershwin, Amelio chose to purchase NeXT and its NeXTSTEP operating system, bringing Steve Jobs back to Apple as an advisor.
Recommended publications
  • Apple Inc AAPL (NAS) | QQQ
    Morningstar Equity Research Apple Inc AAPL (NAS) | QQQ Last Price Fair Value Consider Buy Consider Sell Uncertainty Economic Moat™ Moat Trend™ Stewardship Morningstar Credit Rating Industry Group 541.65 USD 570.00 USD 342.00 USD 883.50 USD High Narrow Positive Standard AA- Computer Hardware Apple will have to fend off increased competition from Vital Statistics Android-based competitors in the years ahead. Market Cap (USD Mil) 483,146 52-Week High (USD) 575.13 52-Week Low (USD) 385.10 Brian Colello, CPA Investment Thesis 28 Jan 2014 52-Week Total Return % 29.1 Senior Analyst [email protected] We believe Apple's strength lies in its experience and expertise in YTD Total Return % -2.9 +1 (312) 384-3742 Last Fiscal Year End 30 Sep 2013 integrating hardware, software, services, and third-party 5-Yr Forward Revenue CAGR % 3.2 applications into differentiated devices that allow Apple to capture 5-Yr Forward EPS CAGR % 1.2 a premium on hardware sales. Although Apple has a sterling brand, Price/Fair Value 0.95 robust product pipeline, and ample opportunity to gain share in its Valuation Summary and Forecasts The primary analyst covering this company various end markets, short product life cycles and intense does not own its stock. Fiscal Year: 2012 2013 2014(E) 2015(E) competition will prevent the firm from resting on its laurels or Price/Earnings 15.1 12.0 12.6 12.2 Research as of 10 Mar 2014 carving out a wide economic moat, in our opinion. EV/EBITDA 10.2 7.3 7.5 7.5 Estimates as of 31 Jan 2014 EV/EBIT 10.8 8.3 8.7 9.2 Pricing data through 01 Apr 2014 Rating updated as of 01 Apr 2014 We believe Apple has developed a narrow economic moat, thanks Free Cash Flow Yield % 6.8 10.6 9.3 8.9 Dividend Yield % 0.4 2.5 2.4 2.4 to switching costs related to a variety of attributes around the iOS Currency amounts expressed with "$" are in U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Apple Strategy Teardown
    Apple Strategy Teardown The maverick of personal computing is looking for its next big thing in spaces like healthcare, AR, and autonomous cars, all while keeping its lead in consumer hardware. With an uphill battle in AI, slowing growth in smartphones, and its fingers in so many pies, can Apple reinvent itself for a third time? In many ways, Apple remains a company made in the image of Steve Jobs: iconoclastic and fiercely product focused. But today, Apple is at a crossroads. Under CEO Tim Cook, Apple’s ability to seize on emerging technology raises many new questions. Primarily, what’s next for Apple? Looking for the next wave, Apple is clearly expanding into augmented reality and wearables with the Apple Watch AirPods wireless headphones. Though delayed, Apple’s HomePod speaker system is poised to expand Siri’s footprint into the home and serve as a competitor to Amazon’s blockbuster Echo device and accompanying virtual assistant Alexa. But the next “big one” — a success and growth driver on the scale of the iPhone — has not yet been determined. Will it be augmented reality, healthcare, wearables? Or something else entirely? Apple is famously secretive, and a cloud of hearsay and gossip surrounds the company’s every move. Apple is believed to be working on augmented reality headsets, connected car software, transformative healthcare devices and apps, as well as smart home tech, and new machine learning applications. We dug through Apple’s trove of patents, acquisitions, earnings calls, recent product releases, and organizational structure for concrete hints at how the company will approach its next self-reinvention.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Company Says a Mask Fooled Face ID on Iphone X 15 November 2017, by Tim Johnson, Mcclatchy Washington Bureau
    Security company says a mask fooled Face ID on iPhone X 15 November 2017, by Tim Johnson, Mcclatchy Washington Bureau biometrics to verify users of computers and other devices and allow them to make purchases and sign into apps with a simple action. Motorola introduced fingerprint readers on a smartphone in 2011, and Apple followed in 2013 with Touch ID on its iPhones. Most major smartphone makers now use such sensors. Face recognition is the next iteration of biometric identification. At a presentation announcing iPhone X's face recognition capabilities Sept. 12, nearly two months before its Nov. 3 release, Apple Senior Vice President Phil Schiller said engineering teams developed artificial intelligence to help the product distinguish between real owners and masks. "They have even gone and worked with professional mask makers and makeup artists in Less than a week after the Apple iPhone X went Hollywood to protect against these attempts to beat on the market, a cybersecurity firm said it had Face ID," Schiller said. already defeated the new phone's vaunted face recognition system using a $150 mask made on a Apple says the iPhone X uses infrared imaging and 3-D printer. a depth map of a user's face with 30,000 invisible dots to ensure identity. It says chances that a "Apple Face ID is not an effective security random person could grab the phone and unlock it measure," a Vietnam-based cybersecurity firm, are one in a million, and that the phone recognizes Bkav, said in a statement and video on its website.
    [Show full text]
  • Defendant Apple Inc.'S Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions Of
    Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 410 Filed 04/08/21 Page 1 of 325 1 THEODORE J. BOUTROUS JR., SBN 132099 MARK A. PERRY, SBN 212532 [email protected] [email protected] 2 RICHARD J. DOREN, SBN 124666 CYNTHIA E. RICHMAN (D.C. Bar No. [email protected] 492089; pro hac vice) 3 DANIEL G. SWANSON, SBN 116556 [email protected] [email protected] GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 4 JAY P. SRINIVASAN, SBN 181471 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. [email protected] Washington, DC 20036 5 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Telephone: 202.955.8500 333 South Grand Avenue Facsimile: 202.467.0539 6 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: 213.229.7000 ETHAN DETTMER, SBN 196046 7 Facsimile: 213.229.7520 [email protected] ELI M. LAZARUS, SBN 284082 8 VERONICA S. MOYÉ (Texas Bar No. [email protected] 24000092; pro hac vice) GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 9 [email protected] 555 Mission Street GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP San Francisco, CA 94105 10 2100 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1100 Telephone: 415.393.8200 Dallas, TX 75201 Facsimile: 415.393.8306 11 Telephone: 214.698.3100 Facsimile: 214.571.2900 Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. 12 13 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 OAKLAND DIVISION 18 19 EPIC GAMES, INC., Case No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR 20 Plaintiff, Counter- DEFENDANT APPLE INC.’S PROPOSED defendant FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 21 OF LAW v. 22 APPLE INC., The Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers 23 Defendant, 24 Counterclaimant. Trial: May 3, 2021 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP DEFENDANT APPLE INC.’S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, 4:20-cv-05640- YGR Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 410 Filed 04/08/21 Page 2 of 325 1 Apple Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Thiel Adopts New Core Curriculum
    Culture Active SI & WL Shock Resident Beloit College Schedules Page 6 Directors Mindset List Page 5 Page 4 Page 4 THE THIELENSIAN the student-run newspaper of Thiel College in Greenville, PA Volume 133 Issue 1 Friday, September 19, 2014 Conference Thiel Adopts New Core Curriculum for SGA by Kristina Cotton, [email protected] by Bri Tiedeman, At Thiel this semester, would have gotten in the be more beneficial for stu- forth to find worth in it. formation out there…with [email protected] a new core curriculum is history of western humani- dents, than the old one, When asked to explain presentation intensive cours- being exercised. There is ties” Professor Brenda DelMaramo said “it’s hard and comment on the new es, you will be picking up a shift from classes that DelMaramo, of the English to predict.” She mentioned core curriculum, Allen Mor- skills along the way,” Mor- study the western humani- department, said. that there are many variables rill, director of the Langen- rill observed. ties to seminar-style classes She pointed out that in the that involve the student’s at- heim Library, emphasized He is very excited for the with varying class subjects, old core classes that re- titude and level of motiva- that the courses in this new research and preparation from Stephen King to Myths volved around the history of tion. curriculum will help stu- that these new courses will Exposed. western humanities, there But DelMaramo conclud- dents develop necessary entail. For the library itself, “The [Seminar] structure was a unifying factor: the ed that education, in any communication skills for the Morrill predicts that there gives more freedom to syllabus and textbooks used case, can have tremendous workforce.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: Where Have All the Processors Gone?
    The Synergist: How to Lead Your Team to Predictable Success Case Study: Where Have All The Processors Gone? It’s hard to find a good, single, stand alone case study for a Processor. It’s not that they are less common than Visionaries or Operators. It’s just that by the very nature of who they are, they eschew the limelight. They prefer to work behind the scenes making sure the systems and processes are in place to allow good organizations to become great organizations. They care little about seeking public praise or adulation. You don’t often see a Processor striding up and down the stage at the annual company retreat, representing the business at a charity event or giving interviews to the local news station. Instead you’ll be more likely to find them making sure that what the company does today is repeatable, consistent and scalable tomorrow and into the future. In many ways they are the unsung hero of our three natural styles. That’s not to say there aren’t examples of them out in the wild. And it’s not to say that at times we wouldn’t want a Processor in charge. We shouldn’t conflate the cult of the Visionary or the get it done mentality of the Operator with good leadership. Yes, quite often, particularly during the early stages of a company’s growth we need a good V or O in charge. But there are occasions when we need the structured, methodical thinking of a P to put in place the systems and processes needed to stable the ship and get us sailing in the right direction again.
    [Show full text]
  • Hello, Courage. That's What Tim Cook Says Matters Most
    | Hello, Courage. That’s what Tim Cook says matters most to him as Apple’s CEO. “Do you have the courage to admit that you’re wrong? And do you change?” he asks rhetorically, in reference to the company’s infamous flops like the Power Mac G4 “Cube” and the iTunes social network Ping. Then last week, Apple’s Phil Schiller cited courage as the guiding light in the decision to remove the headphone jack from the latest iPhone model. Below, we discuss the bold move to drop an industry standard and what it means for consumers and business leaders alike. Also in this Download: holding algorithms accountable, finding a voice, creating products from pollution, and biking into the future. Andrew Benett Global Chief Executive Officer Havas Creative Group What: Apple killed the headphone jack with the newly announced iPhone 7. So What: This is yet another example of Apple showing (rather than asking) people what they want—in this case, an improved listening experience and a nudge toward a wireless future. While change can be hard, the time has come to move on from a technology that's nearly 140 years old. To bring your industry into the future, start by looking critically at your products and services to see what both you and your customers are simply accepting as the status quo. What: Until very recently, LinkedIn’s algorithm appeared to favor men. Meanwhile, Facebook has had to address its own bias issue. So What: Have you ever been frustrated by surge pricing? Algorithms are increasingly shaping our life experiences, and consumers have a right to know how brands are subtly (and not so subtly) influencing them.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan's KDDI to Sell New Iphone in Japan 5 October 2011
    Japan's KDDI to sell new iPhone in Japan 5 October 2011 on September 22 when they dived more than 12 percent after a press report that KDDI has snagged the rights to sell Apple's new iPhone. KDDI shares lost 0.71 percent to 554,000 yen against 624,000 on September 22. Apple shares slipped on Wall Street Tuesday as it unveiled the new iPhone 4 but not the transformative new model many had been expecting. The iPhone 4S features a speedier processor, a Apple's Senior Vice President of Worldwide product built-in "personal assistant" that responds to voice marketing Phil Schiller introduces the new iPhone 4S at commands and a more powerful camera, but it was the company headquarters October 4, 2011 in Cupertino, California. Apple confirmed Wednesday that not the revamped next-generation iPhone 5 many Japan's second largest mobile carrier KDDI would sell its Apple fans had hoped for. latest iPhone in the country, ending rival Softbank's exclusive hold on the popular smartphone. (c) 2011 AFP Apple confirmed Wednesday that Japan's second largest mobile carrier KDDI would sell its latest iPhone in the country, ending rival Softbank's exclusive hold on the popular smartphone. Apple, which unveiled an updated version of the iPhone 4 in the United States on Tuesday, said on its Japanese unit's website that KDDI phone stores as well as Softbank outlets will start selling the new model on October 14. It is the same launch day for the United States, Australia, Canada, France, Germany, and Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • Wearable Technology: Protecting IP Rights and Minimizing Infringement Risks Leveraging Utility Patents, Design Patents, Trademarks and Trade Dress to Safeguard IP
    Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Wearable Technology: Protecting IP Rights and Minimizing Infringement Risks Leveraging Utility Patents, Design Patents, Trademarks and Trade Dress to Safeguard IP TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 2016 1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific Today’s faculty features: John M. Augustyn, Shareholder, Leydig Voit & Mayer, Chicago Rod S. Berman, Partner, Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell, Los Angeles The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10. Tips for Optimal Quality FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY Sound Quality If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection. If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial 1-866-570-7602 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail [email protected] immediately so we can address the problem. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. Viewing Quality To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again. Continuing Education Credits FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY In order for us to process your continuing education credit, you must confirm your participation in this webinar by completing and submitting the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation after the webinar.
    [Show full text]
  • Fistful of Dreams
    Page 1 Friday BEAUTY: Prada launches BEAUTY: limited edition Kristin Davis fragrance, page 9. men’s collections/fall ’09 fronts Ahava’s new body line, page 11. PARIS For more, see WWD.com. Women’s Wear Daily • The Retailers’ Daily Newspaper • January 23, 2009 • $3.00 Beauty s MEN'S: Paris shows WwDFRIdAY kick off with Dries van Noten, Louis Vuitton, Yves Saint Laurent Fistful of Dreams and more, pages 6-7. Diesel hopes to pack a punch in the fragrance market this spring with its first solo men’s offering, Only the Brave. The scent, which will be rolled out by L’Oréal in Germany in late March, France in mid-April and everywhere else in May, features a bottle modeled after Diesel founder Renzo Rosso’s own hand. Sources estimate it could do at least $50 million at retail globally in its first year on counter. For more, see page 9. Balancing the Books: Jones’ $810M Charge Could Signal a Trend By Evan Clark If Jones Apparel Group’s $810 million noncash writedown for goodwill and trademarks is any guide, accountants might exact an even bigger toll on fourth-quarter profits than stingy consumers. Jones said Thursday that the aftertax charge, related mostly to its acquisitions of Nine West and Maxwell Shoe Co., and retail weakness would result in losses of $10.07 to $10.11 a share for the quarter, down from losses of $1.01 a year ago. And Jones isn’t alone. Fashion companies of all stripes could post far steeper losses than weak sales would dictate as they write down goodwill.
    [Show full text]
  • 14.06.15NYT Tim Cook-Making Apple His
    Tim Cook, Making Apple His Own By Matt Richtel and Brian X. Chen NYT 6/15/14 http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/15/technology/tim-cook-making-apple-his- own.html?module=Search&mabReward=relbias%3As%2C%5B%22RI%3A6%22% 2C%22RI%3A18%22%5D Tim Cook, Apple’s chief executiVe, was an adolescent boy in a small Alabama town in the early 1970s when he saw something he couldn’t forget. Bicycling home on a new 10-speed, he passed a large cross in flames in front of a house — one that he knew belonged to a black family. Around the cross were Klansmen, dressed in white cloaks and hoods, chanting racial slurs. Mr. Cook heard glass break, maybe someone throwing something through a window. He yelled, “Stop!” One of the men lifted his conical hood, and Mr. Cook recognized a deacon from a local church (not Mr. Cook’s). Startled, he pedaled away. “This image was permanently imprinted in my brain, and it would change my life foreVer,” Mr. Cook said of the burning cross, in a speech he gaVe last December. In the speech, he said his new awareness made him feel that no matter what you do in life, human rights and dignity are Values that need to be acted upon. And then came the segue: His company, Apple, is one that belieVed deeply in “adVancing humanity.” Mr. Cook, who is 53, took oVer leadership of Apple nearly three years ago, after the death of SteVe Jobs, the company’s revered founder. Like Walt Disney and Henry ford, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Apple's Next Big Challenge: Making Siri Smarter 10 June 2016, by Brandon Bailey
    Apple's next big challenge: Making Siri smarter 10 June 2016, by Brandon Bailey battleground. Apple, Google, Facebook and others are racing to create digital services that consumers will find indispensable for shopping, chatting, controlling other appliances and simply getting through their daily lives. And while Siri has gained new abilities over the years, some experts believe Apple still lags in the AI race, hindered in part by its unwillingness to pry too deeply into your personal information. "Google Now has kind of eaten their lunch," said Chris Monberg, co-founder of Boomtrain, a startup that makes artificial intelligence software used by online retailers. Monberg argues that Google's proactive digital assistant provides more useful In this June 10, 2013, file photo, Eddy Cue, Apple senior reminders, recommendations and tips on local vice president of internet software and services, talking weather or traffic, largely because it reads his email about the new voices of Siri virtual assistant during the and other data from his Android phone and keynote address of the Apple Worldwide Developers crunches it with sophisticated algorithms on Conference in San Francisco. Apple's Siri made a big Google's powerful servers. splash when the wisecracking digital assistant debuted in 2011. But as its competitors jockey to build intelligent "chat bots" and voice-controlled home systems capable Amazon's Echo home speaker likewise has its fans; of more challenging artificial-intelligence feats, Siri at it recognizes informal voice commands and can times no longer seems cutting edge. On Monday, June order flowers, pizza or a ride to the airport.
    [Show full text]